Adaptation of MBMS Architecture and Protocols for SDMB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adaptation of MBMS Architecture and Protocols for SDMB Adaptation of MBMS Architecture and Protocols for SDMB *V. Y. H. Kueh, hB. Martin, jO. Peyrusse, iM. Cole, kE. Bourdin, hC. Selier, *B. G. Evans, jY. Bertrand, kD. Braun *University of Surrey, iLogicaCMG - UK; hAlcatel Space, jMotorola Toulouse SAS, kErcom - France Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Although achieving maximum hardware/software reuse on the network side and at the terminal side is the main design The Satellite Digital Multimedia Broadcast (SDMB) aim of the SDMB system, there are some differences system implements a satellite based broadcast layer to foreseen with respect to UMTS in general, and MBMS in enhance the 3G and beyond 3G systems in the efficient particular, due to the specific requirements and delivery of the Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service characteristics of SDMB to implement its specific features. (MBMS). Designed to accommodate 3G standardised Hence this paper describes these differences and the handsets with low cost impact and no form factor adaptations made in SDMB with respect to MBMS, modifications, the SDMB system is based on the 3GPP whereby their impact on the MBMS architecture and standardised technology and utilizes the IMT2000 protocols and procedures as defined in 3GPP is also frequency band. This paper describes the differences and highlighted. The work presented here is based on the the adaptations made in SDMB with respect to MBMS, current output from the IST MAESTRO (Mobile and highlights their impact on the MBMS architecture and Applications & sErvices based on Satellite and Terrestrial protocols. inteRwOrking) integrated project [3]. Keywords – MBMS, SDMB, UMTS, WCDMA The paper is organised as follows. In section II, after I INTRODUCTION briefly illustrating the overall SDMB architecture, the respective SDMB entities and components are described in Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (MBMS) is more detail with regard to their modifications and/or add- currently under standardization in various groups within ons with the impact foreseen to the MBMS architecture. the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) with the first This is followed by a description of the differences in phase set to be finalised as part of the Release 6 standard SDMB with respect to the MBMS protocols and [1]. By enhancing the UMTS system with broadcast and procedures and their expected impact. Section IV multicast mode capability, the main aim of MBMS is to concludes the paper. efficiently support, in terms of radio and network resources, simultaneous distribution of identical rich II IMPACT OF SDMB ON MBMS ARCHITECTURE multimedia content (streaming and download-and-play The SDMB system architecture is depicted in Figure 1, type services) to large user groups. whereby the satellite link is unidirectional, with the To complement this effort, a hybrid mobile satellite interactive link provided by the standard terrestrial 2G/3G broadcast system, also known as the Satellite Digital mobile network (note that a direct satellite return link is Multimedia Broadcast (SDMB) system [2], has been envisaged in the future evolution of the SDMB system). defined to provide a dependable and cost effective The system is compliant with the broadcast mode of the broadband transmission capacity for multimedia services 3GPP defined MBMS standard, allowing the support of such as mobile TV and video services for mobile services open services platforms as defined in the Open Mobile over a pan-European coverage. In addition to utilizing the Alliance (OMA). 3GPP standardised technology (where possible), the Example of umbrella cells coverage SDMB system makes use of IMT2000 satellite frequency over Europe bands and high power geostationary (GEO) satellite(s) Satellite High power IMT2000 distribution link Geo- combined with terrestrials gap-fillers in order to mobile stationary satellite band satellite accommodate low cost 3G handsets with outdoor as well (S-band) 3G Air interface as indoor reception. Based on this concept of a hybrid FSS (Ka) Direct link frequency satellite/terrestrial architecture, SDMB takes advantage of band Terrestrial Indirect link the natural assets of satellite systems, while ensuring Repeaters Hub based (IMR) on 3G equipment maximum interoperability with terrestrial UMTS (T- 2G/3G standard UMTS) standards in order to encourage multimedia usage Interactive link Content providers take-up in Europe and contribute to the successful 3G handset 2G/3G Mobile Network Content + satellite Network deployment of 3G. Such hybrid architectures have proven features to be business-successful in USA, as demonstrated by the 2G/3G Base MBMS Broadcast/Multicast station Service Centre popular XM Radio/Sirius mobile satellite broadcasting systems. Figure 1: SDMB system architecture and its interworking with terrestrial network Each of the SDMB entities and components shown in re-combine it. The cost of either change is expected to be Figure 1 is described in more detail in the following minimal. subsections. B. Intermediate Module Repeater (IMR) A. User equipment (UE) The IMR receives signal from the space segment and re- The UE is a 3GPP compliant dual mode GSM/UMTS amplifies it. Basically, IMRs will be deployed in terminal, with frequency band extension. It is able to urban/suburban areas, to offer deep indoor coverage and perform parallel idle mode, i.e. maintaining either GSM increase throughput where the satellite signal is not 100% activity or UMTS activity during SDMB reception. The available. They can be co-located with T-UMTS Node Bs. basic type does not have a dedicated receiver for SDMB The SDMB architecture allows the deployment of several and is then required to switch from UMTS terrestrial to types of IMRs : SDMB satellite reception. The enhanced type has a dedicated reception chain for SDMB and is then able to Frequency conversion repeater: receives the SDMB receive SDMB data flow without interruption. signal from the SDMB satellite in High Density Fixed Satellite Systems (HDFSS) frequency bands, amplifies One of the goals of the SDMB system is to have the lowest and retransmits in Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) possible cost impact on the UE, starting with an UE that is band. Tx antenna gain is typically 15 dB (sectored compliant with the UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access antenna), total Tx power ranges from 30 to 35 dBm. Network (UTRAN) standards. This implies that the UE must have little hardware and software changes to be able On-channel repeater: receives the SDMB carriers from to receive contents through the SDMB system. So SDMB the SDMB satellite in MSS band, amplifies them and re-uses as much as possible the existing protocols and air retransmit them on the same frequency slot(s). Tx interfaces defined in UTRAN. antenna gain is typically 15 dB (sectored antenna), while total Tx power is 30 dBm. Due to required Nevertheless remaining adaptations of the UE are needed. isolation between Rx and Tx antenna, this solution One element of SDMB with regards to MBMS is the use of targets limited coverage such as in-building, tunnel, the downlink only: during the attach procedure and the and underground. transfer of data for SDMB, in order to save current drain in the UE, no uplink transfer to the satellite is recommended. Node B-based repeater: receives the SDMB signal One possible solution is to use the 3G terrestrial networks from the SDMB satellite in HDFSS frequency bands, to perform a “classical” (as defined in 3GPP) attachment amplifies and retransmits in MSS band. Tx antenna procedure, then handover to the satellite in order to receive gain is typically 15 dB (sectored antenna), while total the data transfer from the SDMB system. The drawback to Tx power is up to 43 dBm. It is built with 3GPP this solution is the need for cooperation between terrestrial standardised Node B. IMR is managed by the Radio and satellite operators. An alternative solution would be to Network Controller (RNC) of the Hub for radio modify the attachment procedure to avoid the terminal resource allocation and transmission synchronisation. sending information to the satellite and thus receive It is under the control of the RNC of the Hub, via Iub directly all the required information to establish a data interface over the satellite radio link. This link is transfer. unidirectional, thus adaptation of Iub protocols must be implemented. This type of IMR can be integrated During the data transfer, the UE should not send a request inside a T-UMTS Node B. for missing blocks to the satellite directly. This could be avoided by using the terrestrial networks (through requests IMRs are equipped with O&M modules and a wireline/less for missing packets at higher level, IP for instance) or by modem for site supervision and equipment monitoring. using techniques such as data carousels or adapted Forward Error Correction (FEC) algorithm. When IMRs repeat the satellite signal with the same scrambling code, UE Rake receiver maximum window Another change is due to the difference in the channel length introduces high synchronisation constraints on IMR propagation properties between the satellite and terrestrial signal transmission and also fixes IMR coverage radius networks. To ensure optimum reception quality for SDMB, limitations. more fingers (12) should be allowed for the recombination The 3rd type of IMR, Node B based repeater, will of the signal compared to the number of fingers used in the terrestrial environment (usually up to 8). Since mobile eventually allow implementation of signal repetition with a manufacturers mainly implement rake receivers by using a scrambling code different from the one on the satellite signal. In this way, soft and/or selective combining as hardware accelerator, this would imply a hardware change in the UE to increase the number of fingers. specified by 3GPP can be introduced in SDMB. Another advantage is the re-use of 3GPP flexibility such as The last constraint considered herein is the need of a wider enlarged UE reception window, thus decreasing window for re-combining the received signals at the rake synchronisation constraints on the IMR signal receiver level in the case of SDMB.
Recommended publications
  • Advances in Satellite Technologies- ISRO Initiatives
    Advances in Satellite Technologies- ISRO Initiatives Sumitesh Sarkar Space Applications Centre (ISRO) March 27, 2019 National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies - Mach 27, 2019 Advance Technology : Key Areas Migration from Broadcast/VSAT centric to Data-centric Payload design - HTS . Multi-beam coverage in Ku and Ka-band ensuring Frequency Reuse and enhanced Payload performance . Increased Payload Hardware – need for miniaturization . Addressing new applications like Mobile backhauling, In-Flight Connectivity etc. Special focus on unserved/underserved regions within India Use of Higher frequency bands – Ku to Ka to Q/V band . Migration to higher frequency bands – ‘User ‘ as well as ‘Feeder’ links . More interference free Spectrum . Constraints of available technologies Redefining MSS with enhanced capabilities . Multi-beam High power transponders in S-band - enabling SDMB services National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies - Mach 27, 2019 2 Evolution in On-board Antenna Technology Single Circular beam Shaped Beam Multibeam(HTS) (Dual Gridded Reflector) National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies - Mach 27, 2019 Technology Trends – Active Low power RF Circuits MMIC SOC 9mm X 6mm Ka-band (In test) 100mmx40mm 70mmx60mm x25mm x22mm based based MMIC die in pac. pac. MMIC Chip MMIC LTCC pac. Qualified (In BB test) 100mmx100mm x25mm Gen In production by industry nd MIC based MIC 2 RF Technologies RF 170mmx100mmx35mm MIC MIC based 200mmx180mmx100mm (2RF sec.) 1stgen. INSAT-2A to INSAT-2D INSAT-3 and 4 Series GSAT-5 GSAT-7/11 Future technologies Payload Generation National Workshop on Advances in Satellite Technologies - Mach 27, 2019 High Throughput Satellite : GSAT-11 Features: .
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on Behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1
    Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1 1 AT&T, a member of SIA, does not necessarily endorse all conclusions of this study. Page 1 of 75 Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents ................................................................................................ 1 2. Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 4 2.1. What the satellite industry does for the U.S. today ............................................... 4 2.2. What the satellite industry offers going forward ................................................... 4 2.3. Innovation in the satellite industry ........................................................................ 5 3. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2. Spectrum Basics ...................................................................................................... 8 3.3. Satellite Industry Segments .................................................................................... 9 3.3.1. Satellite Communications ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • L-Shaped Monopole Antenna with Modified Partial Ground Plane for Multiband Operation
    International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8 Issue-10, August 2019 L-Shaped Monopole Antenna with Modified Partial Ground Plane for Multiband Operation Prachi Pandey, Neelesh Agrawal, Mukesh Kumar, Navendu Nitin, Anil Kumar Abstract- In this paper a design of L-shaped monopole In [4] a meandered T-shaped monopole is proposed for antenna (LMA) with modified partial ground plane for multiband 2.45/5.2/5.8 GHz LAN operations with a long and a short operation is presented. The `dimension of proposed antenna is arm strip extended from the feedline. A compact improved 40× 47 mm2 with 1.6 height using Teflon substrate having T-Form monopole antenna [5] using two asymmetric dielectric constant 2.1. The ground plane is amended by inserting horizontal strips has been designed to achieve multiband an anti-symmetric horizontal L-slots. Single band to multiband behaviour is accomplished by applying two horizontal L-slots on operation. In [6] a C-shaped monopole antenna is designed partial ground plane of LMA. Both the slots are antisymmetric to having a shorted parasitic strip to obtain two separate Y-axis. The parametric study has also been done which is impedance bandwidth. Frequency agility, improved gain and responsible for antenna behaviour. The operating frequency beam forming can be attained by applying additional bands of designed antenna are 2.35-2.91GHz,3.24-3.51GHz dielectric layers. But additional layers increase the weight of ,4.31-5.30GHz and 5.90-6.31GHz which is suitable for Bluetooth the antenna which is again undesirable in wireless (2.4GHZ),WLAN (2.4GHz,5.2GHz), WiMAX (2.3GHz, 2.5GHz, environment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Layman's Interpretation Guide L-Band and C-Band Synthetic
    A Layman’s Interpretation Guide to L-band and C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar data Version 2.0 15 November, 2018 Table of Contents 1 About this guide .................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Briefly about Synthetic Aperture Radar ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 The radar wavelength .................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Polarisation ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Radar backscatter ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.3.1 Sigma-nought .................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.3.2 Gamma-nought ............................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Backscatter mechanisms .............................................................................................................. 4 2.4.1 Direct backscatter ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.4.2 Forward scattering ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Communications
    Satellite Communications Ashaad Rambharos CSE, Intelsat 1 Satellite Example IS904 • General Satellite Information • Spacecraft Type: Three-Axis Stabilized • Orbital Location: 60.0 ° East Longitude • Orbital Control: +/- 0.05 ° • Launch: 23 February 2002 2 IS904 Coverage maps 3 General Satellite Information cont • Payload: Up to 34 x 72 MHz C-Band transponders * • Up to 11 x 36 MHz C-Band transponders * • 2 x 41 MHz C-Band transponders • Up to 2 x 77 MHz Ku-Band transponders • Up to 6 x 72 MHz Ku-Band transponders • Up to 8 x 36 MHz Ku-Band transponders • Frequency Bands: • C-Band: Uplink 5850 – 6425 MHz • Downlink 3625 – 4200 MHz • Ku-Band: Uplink 14.00 – 14.50 GHz • Downlink 10.95 – 11.20 GHz (Band A) and • Downlink 11.45 – 11.70 GHz (Band B) • Beacons: • 3947.5 or 3948 MHz 3952 or 3952.5 MHz • 11198 MHz 11452 MHz 4 Intelsat 904 C-Band Payload • Number of Transponders: • Up to 34 x 72 MHz * • Up to 11 x 36 MHz * • 2 x 41 MHz • Transponder Bandwidth: • 72 MHz with 8 MHz Guard Bands • 36 MHz with 4 MHz Guard Bands • 41 MHz with 4 MHz Guard Bands • Polarization: Circular: LHCP and RHCP • SFD (at Beam Reference Contour): -67.0 to -89.0 dBW/m² • Input Attenuators: 22 dB in 2 dB steps • 5 Intelsat 904 C-Band Payload cont • G/T: > -11.2 dB/K typical for GA, GB > -7.4 dB/K typical for WH > -5.1 dB/K typical for EH > 0.0 dB/K typical for NWZ > -1.5 dB/K typical for NEZ, SEZ > -3.5 dB/K typical for MEZ > -5.0 dB/K typical for SWZ > -4.5 dB/K typical for CEZ (combined NEZ/SEZ) • EIRP: > 31.0 dBW typical for GA, GB > 40.1 dBW typical for Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations and Strategies for Maximizing C-Band Deployment
    Considerations and Strategies for Maximizing C-band Deployment Solutions and Best Practices Contents Abstract . 3 Introduction . 3 Beamforming. 4 Site Architecture ............................................................. 6 Coexistence with FSS. 7 Supply Power ................................................................ 8 Small Cells. 8 Fronthaul and Backhaul ...................................................... 10 Summary. 11 2 Considerations and Strategies for Maximizing C-band Deployment - Solutions and Best Practices Abstract The recently concluded C-band auction has created new opportunities to help mobile operators address the ever- growing need for network capacity, spectral efficiency and a migration path to 5G and beyond. As with all mobile technology innovations, the benefits the new C-band spectrum provides will depend on how operators plan for and implement it into their existing legacy networks. There are a number of key challenges, including the integration of advanced beamforming technologies, the rise of massive and multi-user MIMO, site architecture issues, potential interference with fixed satellite services and use with small cells, to name a few. This white paper provides a wide- angle perspective of some of the major challenges facing operators as they consider the strategies for deploying new C-band capabilities. It also shines a light on some of the innovative developments from leading network OEMs like CommScope. Introduction As we begin 2021, the first commercial 5G networks are well in 46 major markets in late 2021. The remaining 180 MHz over a year into operation. During the past year, 5G activities (3.8–3.98 GHz) will be added nationwide in a second phase on a have accelerated and now outpace the growth rate of all past timeline to be agreed upon by the parties in each market.
    [Show full text]
  • An Elementary Approach Towards Satellite Communication
    AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI AN ELEMENTARY APPROACH TOWARDS SATELLITE COMMUNICATION WRITERS Prof. Dr. Hari Krishnan GOPAKUMAR Prof. Dr. Ashok JAMMI Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co. Publications: 06/2021 APRIL-2021 Publisher Certificate No: 36934 E-ISBN: 978-605-7594-89-1 Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co. Publications All kinds of publication rights of this scientific book belong to GÜVEN PLUS GROUP CONSULTANCY INC. CO. PUBLICATIONS. Without the written permission of the publisher, the whole or part of the book cannot be printed, broadcast, reproduced or distributed electronically, mechanically or by photocopying. The responsibility for all information and content in this Book, visuals, graphics, direct quotations and responsibility for ethics / institutional permission belongs to the respective authors. In case of any legal negativity, the institutions that support the preparation of the book, especially GÜVEN PLUS GROUP CONSULTANCY INC. CO. PUBLISHING, the institution (s) responsible for the editing and design of the book, and the book editors and other person (s) do not accept any “material and moral” liability and legal responsibility and cannot be taken under legal obligation. We reserve our rights in this respect as GÜVEN GROUP CONSULTANCY “PUBLISHING” INC. CO. in material and moral aspects. In any legal problem/situation TURKEY/ISTANBUL courts are authorized. This work, prepared and published by Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc. Co., has ISO: 10002: 2014- 14001: 2004-9001: 2008-18001: 2007 certificates. This work is a branded work by the TPI “Turkish Patent Institute” with the registration number “Güven Plus Group Consultancy Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Raytheon Missile Systems Application to Renew WF2XLI File No: 0036-EX-CR-2017
    Raytheon Missile Systems Application to Renew WF2XLI File No: 0036-EX-CR-2017 Explanation of Experiments and Need for Experimental License for use of Several Frequency Bands for Lab and Factory Missile Communications Testing Overview: Raytheon Missile Systems builds and sells missiles to the US military. As a part of the engineering development and production process, RMS tests communications systems in its products to make sure they meet customer specifications. Currently, RMS holds a license for operations in Tucson, Arizona and Camden, Arkansas, WF2XLI, for the ongoing operations it is requesting to renew. The ongoing experimental operations are for testing command and control systems in the lab and for factory missile communications testing. The four radio systems are used in the field by Raytheon’s customers for Range Safety. The four radio systems used for testing are the Flight Terminate Receiver (UHF), the L- band telemetry transmitter, the S-Band telemetry transmitter, and the C-Band transponder. These systems must be tested and retested as part of the production process for the Range Flight Safety System. This license uses the systems installed on missiles that will be tested at government ranges. Prior to delivery of the product to the customer, the product must be tested as part of engineering development and production testing. The actual missile flight testing is conducted at government test and training ranges using federal frequency assignments. Since the lab and production testing is ongoing at Raytheon’s facilities, and because some of the work being done is actually internal to Raytheon as part of independent research and development, it is necessary to renew this experimental authorization to allow for the proper, licensed operation of the missile during development and production testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite and Terrestrial Hybrid Networks
    RTT TECHNOLOGY TOPIC July 2007 Satellite and terrestrial hybrid networks In this month's Technology Topic we analyze how the dynamics of the satellite business are changing and what this means for the global cellular operator and terrestrial broadcasting community. In particular we study the impact of hybrid satellite terrestrial systems on present cellular and terrestrial broadcast business models. Dual mode networks that combine satellite and GSM cellular services already exist. Thuraya, a network operator servicing the United Arab Emirates and ACeS servicing Asia are two present examples. Hybrid satellite/terrestrial systems are different in that they use terrestrial repeaters to combine the wide area coverage capabilities of satellites with the urban coverage and in building capabilities provided from terrestrial networks. These may or may not be associated with existing cellular or terrestrial broadcast networks. The terrestrial repeaters are described in the US as Ancillary Terrestrial Components (ATC) and in Europe and Asia as Ground Based Components. In China the networks are described as Satellite and Terrestrial Interactive Multi Service Infrastructure (STiMI). Hybrid networks are already used in the US to deliver audio broadcasting for in car and more recently in flight entertainment. Widespread deployments of these systems are planned both for audio and TV broadcasting and for two way cellular service provision. These deployments exploit already allocated L Band and S Band spectrum in US and rest of the world markets. Some of this spectrum has been gifted to the operators. Typically these allocations are not owned by traditional terrestrial cellular or terrestrial broadcast service providers. As such they represent a competitive threat and by implication a collaborative opportunity for the cellular network operator and traditional terrestrial broadcast community.
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Radio Frequency Interference Studies at C-Band Using a Digital Receiver
    Airborne Radio Frequency Interference Studies at C-band using a Digital Receiver J. T. Johnson, A. J. Gasiewski∗, G. A. Hampson, S. W. Ellingson†, R. Krishnamachari, and M. Klein∗ Dept. of Electrical Engineering and ElectroScience Laboratory The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210, USA Email: [email protected] ∗ NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory R/ET1, Room 3B-157, 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80305-3328, USA Email: [email protected] †Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech 340 Whittemore Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA Email: [email protected] Abstract— An airborne system for observing radio frequency this digital receiver is capable of providing highly detailed interference at C-band is described. The digital receiver included information on RFI properties as well as implementing some has the capability of providing high temporal and spectral reso- simple RFI mitigation strategies. lution of interference, as well as implementing simple mitigation strategies. Plans for observations with the system are discussed. The next section of the paper provides a brief discussion of RFI issues for traditional microwave radiometers, while I. INTRODUCTION Section III describes a basic block diagram of the system The absence of a protected portion of the spectrum at C- developed. Section IV then provides more information on the band [1] makes radio frequency interference (RFI) a major digital receiver, and Section V describes preliminary plans for concern for C-band microwave radiometry. The C-band chan- flights and experiments. nel of the AMSR-E radiometer on the AQUA satellite has already shown a major corruption of data over a large percent- II.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Paper on Interference with Satellite Communications
    Position Paper on Interference in C-band by Terrestrial Wireless Applications to Satellite Applications Adopted by International Associations of the Satellite Communications Industry Position Statement: National administrations should recognize the potential for massive disruptions to C band satellite communications, radar systems and domestic microwave links, if spectrum is inappropriately allocated to, and frequencies inappropriately assigned for, terrestrial wireless applications in the C- band (specifically 3.4 – 4.2 GHz). Executive summary: Satellite communications technology in the C band is used for broadcasting television signals, Internet delivery, data communication, voice telephony and aviation systems. The satellite systems that operate in the 3.4-4.2 GHz band (C band) are suffering substantial interference, to the point of system failure, in places where national administrations are allowing Broadband Wireless Access systems like wi-fi and wi-max to share the same spectrum bands already being used to provide satellite services. The same will happen if 3G and the planned 4G mobile systems (also referred to as IMT systems) are allowed to use the frequencies used in the C band for satellite downlink services as is being contemplated by some administrations in the context of WRC-07 agenda item 1.4. To eliminate this harmful interference, operators of satellite earth stations and users of satellite communications services have united to communicate their positions and technical requirements to national and international telecommunications regulators. Regulators and radio frequency managers need to allocate spectrum in ways that recognize the reality of harmful interference and validate the right of incumbent operators to operate, and their customers to enjoy their services, without disruption by new users.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultra-Wideband WDM Optical Network Optimization
    hv photonics Article Ultra-Wideband WDM Optical Network Optimization Stanisław Kozdrowski 1,* , Mateusz Zotkiewicz˙ 1 and Sławomir Sujecki 2,3 1 Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electronics, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 George Green Institute, the University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; [email protected] 3 Telecommunications and Teleinformatics Department, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 December 2019; Accepted: 13 January 2020; Published: 21 January 2020 Abstract: Ultra-wideband wavelength division multiplexed networks enable operators to use more effectively the bandwidth offered by a single fiber pair and thus make significant savings, both in operational and capital expenditures. The main objective of this study is to minimize optical node resources, such as transponders, multiplexers and wavelength selective switches, needed to provide and maintain high quality of network services, in ultra-wideband wavelength division multiplexed networks, at low cost. A model based on integer programming is proposed, which includes a detailed description of optical network nodal resources. The developed optimization tools are used to study the ultra-wideband wavelength division multiplexed network performance when compared with the traditional C-band wavelength division multiplexed networks. The analysis is carried out for realistic networks of different dimensions and traffic demand sets. Keywords: ultra-Wideband WDM system design; optical network optimization; CDC-F technology; optical node model; network congestion; Linear Programming (LP); Integer Programming (IP) 1. Introduction Optical networks based on Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM) technology that operate within the C-band are near the limit of their capacity.
    [Show full text]