DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Instructions for the Urban Inventory of San

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Instructions for the Urban Inventory of San FIELD INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE URBAN INVENTORY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA & PORTLAND, OREGON 2018 FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS RESOURCE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION USDA FOREST SERVICE Note to User: URBAN FIA Field Guide 7.2 is based on the National CORE Field Guide, Version 7.2. Data elements are national CORE unless indicated as follows: • National CORE data elements that end in “+U” (e.g., x.x+U) have had values,codes, or text added, changed, or adjusted from the CORE program. Any additional URBAN FIA text for a national CORE data element is hi-lighted or shown as an "Urban Note". • All URBAN FIA data elements end in “U” (e.g., x.xU). The text for an URBAN FIA data element is not hi- lighted and does not have a corresponding variable in CORE. • URBAN FIA electronic file notes: • national CORE data elements that are not applicable in URBAN FIA are formatted as light gray or light gray hidden text. • hyperlink cross-references are included for various sections, figures, and tables. *National CORE data elements retain their national CORE field guide data element/variable number but may not retain their national CORE field guide location or sequence within the guide. pg.3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION . 11 SECTION 1.1 URBAN OVERVIEW. .11 SECTION 1.2 FIELD GUIDE LAYOUT . 12 SECTION 1.3 UNITS OF MEASURE . 12 CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION . 13 SECTION 2.1 PLOT SETUP . 15 SECTION 2.2 PLOT INTEGRITY . 15 SECTION 2.3 PLOT MONUMENTATION . 15 ITEM 2.3.0.1 MONUMENT TYPE (CORE 0.3.1U) . 15 ITEM 2.3.0.2 MONUMENT NUMBER (CORE 0.3.2U) . 16 ITEM 2.3.0.3 SUBPLOT / MICROPLOT NUMBER (CORE 0.3.3U) . 16 ITEM 2.3.0.4 SUBPLOT / MICROPLOT OFFSET POINT (CORE 0.3.4U). 16 ITEM 2.3.0.5 WITNESS OBJECT / SP / RP TYPE (CORE 0.3.5U) . 17 ITEM 2.3.0.6 WITNESS OBJECT / SP / RP SPECIES (CORE 0.3.6U) . 17 ITEM 2.3.0.7 OBJECT DESCRIPTION (CORE 0.3.7U) . 17 ITEM 2.3.0.8 MONUMENT AZIMUTH (CORE 0.3.8U) . 17 ITEM 2.3.0.9 MONUMENT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (CORE 0.3.9U) . 18 ITEM 2.3.0.10 MONUMENT DBH / DRC (CORE 0.3.10U). 18 CHAPTER 3 PLOT LEVEL DATA. 19 ITEM 3.0.0.1 CYCLE (CORE 1.0.1U) . 19 ITEM 3.0.0.2 SUB-CYCLE (CORE 1.0.2U). 19 ITEM 3.0.0.3 STATE (CORE 1.1) . 19 ITEM 3.0.0.4 COUNTY (CORE 1.2) . 19 ITEM 3.0.0.5 PLOT NUMBER (CORE 1.3). 20 ITEM 3.0.0.6 URBAN PLOT STATUS (CORE 1.4+U) . 20 ITEM 3.0.0.7 URBAN PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON (CORE 1.7+U). 20 ITEM 3.0.0.8 SAMPLE KIND (CORE 1.10+U) . 21 ITEM 3.0.0.9 PREVIOUS PLOT NUMBER (URBAN OPTIONAL COLLECTED IN NRS, PNW, SRS) (CORE 1.11) . 21 SECTION 3.1 CURRENT DATE . 21 ITEM 3.1.0.1 YEAR (CORE 1.13.1) . 21 ITEM 3.1.0.2 MONTH (CORE 1.13.2). 22 ITEM 3.1.0.3 DAY (CORE 1.13.3) . 22 ITEM 3.1.0.4 DECLINATION (URBAN OPTIONAL COLLECTED IN PNW) (CORE 1.14). 22 ITEM 3.1.0.5 HORIZONTAL DISTANCE TO IMPROVED ROAD (CORE 1.15+U) . 22 ITEM 3.1.0.6 WATER ON PLOT (CORE 1.16+U) . 23 ITEM 3.1.0.7 QA STATUS (CORE 1.17) . 23 ITEM 3.1.0.8 CREW NUMBER (CORE 1.18) . 23 of Contents Table SECTION 3.2 GPS COORDINATES . 24 SUBSECTION 3.2.1 GPS UNIT SETTINGS, DATUM, AND COORDINATE SYSTEM . .24 SUBSECTION 3.2.2 REALTIME PLOT CENTER GPS COORDINATES . .24 ITEM 3.2.2.1 SURVEY GRADE GPS SUBPLOT ROVER FILES COLLECTED (PNW) . 24 ITEM 3.2.2.2 GPS UNIT (CORE 1.19.3). 24 ITEM 3.2.2.3 GPS SERIAL NUMBER (CORE 1.19.4) . .25 ITEM 3.2.2.4 GPS ENTRY METHOD (CORE 1.19.5) . 25 ITEM 3.2.2.5 GPS DATUM (CORE 1.19.6) . 25 pg.4 ITEM 3.2.2.6 COORDINATE SYSTEM (CORE 1.19.7) . 25 ITEM 3.2.2.7 UTM ZONE (URBAN OPTIONAL COLLECTED IN PNW) (CORE1.19.10) . 26 ITEM 3.2.2.8 EASTING (X) UTM (URBAN OPTIONAL COLLECTED IN PNW) (CORE 1.19.11) . 26 ITEM 3.2.2.9 NORTHING (Y) UTM (URBAN OPTIONAL COLLECTED IN PNW) (CORE 1.19.12) . 26 SUBSECTION 3.2.3 CORRECTION FOR "OFFSET" GPS LOCATION . .27 ITEM 3.2.3.1 AZIMUTH TO PLOT CENTER (CORE 1.19.14) . 27 ITEM 3.2.3.2 DISTANCE TO PLOT CENTER (CORE 1.19.15) . 27 ITEM 3.2.3.3 COORDINATE DIFFERENCE (CORE 1.19.15.1U) . 27 ITEM 3.2.3.4 GPS ELEVATION (CORE 1.19.16). 27 ITEM 3.2.3.5 GPS ERROR (CORE 1.19.17) . 28 ITEM 3.2.3.6 NUMBER OF READINGS (CORE 1.19.18) . 28 ITEM 3.2.3.7 GPS FILE NAME (CORE OPTIONAL 1.19.19). 28 ITEM 3.2.3.8 PLOT NOTES (CORE 1.21) . 28 ITEM 3.2.3.9 SAFETY (CORE 1.21.1U) . 29 ITEM 3.2.3.10 SAFETY DESCRIPTION (CORE 1.21.1.1U). 29 ITEM 3.2.3.11 INVASIVE PLANT SAMPLING STATUS (CORE 1.23+U) . 29 ITEM 3.2.3.12 INVASIVE PLANT SPECIMEN COLLECTION RULE (CORE 1.24) . 30 CHAPTER 4 CONDITION CLASS . 31 SECTION 4.1 DETERMINATION OF CONDITION CLASS . 31 SECTION 4.2 CONDITION CLASS STATUS DEFINITIONS . 32 SUBSECTION 4.2.1 FOREST LAND . .36 SUBSECTION 4.2.2 URBAN NONFOREST LAND . .36 SECTION 4.3 DELINEATING CONDITION CLASSES DIFFERING IN CONDITION CLASS STATUS . 37 ITEM 4.3.0.1 CONDITION CLASS NUMBER (CORE 2.4.1) . 39 ITEM 4.3.0.2 URBAN CONDITION CLASS STATUS (CORE 2.4.2+U) . 39 ITEM 4.3.0.3 URBAN CONDITION NONSAMPLED REASON (CORE 2.4.3+U). 40 SECTION 4.4 DELINEATING CONDITION CLASSES WITHIN ACCESSIBLE FOREST LAND . 41 ITEM 4.4.0.1 URBAN RESERVED STATUS (CORE 2.5.1+U) . 44 ITEM 4.4.0.2 URBAN OWNER GROUP (CORE 2.5.2 +U) . 44 ITEM 4.4.0.3 FOREST TYPE (CORE 2.5.3). 44 ITEM 4.4.0.4 STAND SIZE CLASS (CORE 2.5.4).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Caterpillars – the Threat
    Caterpillars – The threat •Plant health •Site conditions •Abundance of pest •Client Concerns •Regulatory Concerns Pesticides for Caterpillars Biologicals Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) Spinosad (Conserve, Fertilome etc) Insect Growth Regulators Diflubenzuron = Dimilin Fenoxycarb = Precision Tebufenozide = Confirm Pyriproxifen = Distance Neem, Azadirachtin Pyrethroids- Rescue Treatments Bifenthrin (Talstar) Cyfluthrin (Decathalon) Deltamethrin (Deltagard) Fluvalinate (Mavrik) Lamda -Cyhalothrin (Scimitar, Battle) Permethrin (Astro, Spectracide) Oldies but goodies… Carbaryl (Sevin) Acephate (Orthene) Tips For Bagworms, Fall Webworms and other large caterpillars Most pesticides kill caterpillars that are <1” long Spinosad kills largest stages, Pyrethroids are second best Pyrethroids are contact insecticides and useful for killing FWW blown out of webs. Caterpillar Pests- How much injury do they inflict? •Types- Exposed, Concealed •Abundance – Solitary, or Gregarious? •Host Range – What do they eat? •Number of Generations /Year •Abundance of Natural Enemies Concealed Defoliators Mimosa webworm Fall webworm Eastern tent caterpillar Bagworm Leaf crumpler Mimosa Webworm Damage Close-up of webbed branch Webs and Frass of Mimosa Webworm Caterpillar Mimosa Webworm Caterpillar (Late Stage) Overwintering Stage (Pupa) Mimosa Webworm Adult Fall Webworm Fall webworm caterpillar Adult Fall Webworm Adult and Egg Mass of Fall Webworm Eastern Tent Caterpillar Webs on Trees Close-up of Eastern Tent Caterpillar Egg Mass of Eastern Tent
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Korscheltellus Gracilis, a Root Feeder Associated with Spruce-Fir Decline William E
    BIOECOLOGY OF THE CONIFER SWIFT MOTH, KORSCHELTELLUS GRACILIS, A ROOT FEEDER ASSOCIATED WITH SPRUCE-FIR DECLINE WILLIAM E. WALLNER1 DAVID L. WAGNER2 BRUCE L. PARKER3 and DONALD R. TOB13 'USDA Forest Service Northeastern Forest Experiment Station 51 Mill Pond Road Hamden, CT 06514 U.S.A. 2~niversityof Connecticut Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Storrs, CT 06268 U.S.A. 3~niversityof Vermont Department of Plant and Soil Science Burlington, VT 05401 U.S.A. INTRODUCTION During the past two decades, the decline of red spruce, Picea nrbens Sargent, and balsam fir, Abies bahamea (L), at high elevations (900-1200 m) in eastern North America has evoked concern about the effects of anthropogenic deposition upon terrestrial ecosystems. In many high-elevation forests across New England, as many as 50 percent of the standing red spruce are dead (Hertel et al. 1987). Wood cores indicate that growth has been severely curtailed since the 1960s (Hornbeck and Smith 19s). Although acid rain is most commonly invoked as the principal causal agent of this decline, there is yet little hard evidence to support this claim (Johnson and Siccama 1983, Pitelka and Rayno1 1989). A wide array of anthropogenic pollutants in combination with natural stress factors are probably involved. Above-ground portions of declining trees appear relatively pest free, and SO do the roots except for observations of a few soil-inhabiting arthropods. The most prevalent among those few was a subterranean lepidopteran polyphage, Korscheltelhcs gracilis Grote, found to be extremely abundant in these declining forests (Tobi et al. 1989, Wagner et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimmerman Pine Moth Phil Pellitteri, UW Insect Diagnostic Lab
    XHT1164 Provided to you by: Zimmerman Pine Moth Phil Pellitteri, UW Insect Diagnostic Lab Zimmerman pine moth (Dioryctria zimmermani) was first detected in the US in 1879, and has subsequently been found and is established throughout the northern US east of the Rocky Mountains. Austrian and Scots pines are preferred hosts of Zimmerman pine moth. However Eastern white and mugo pines are also attacked. Symptoms of Zimmerman pine moth. Tunneling by larvae in branch whorls leads to formation of masses of pitch (left). Sap from feeding sites often runs down branches and trunks (right). Left photo courtesy of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Archive, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Bugwood.org Appearance: Adult Zimmerman pine moths are midsized with gray and red- brown wings, marked with zigzag lines. Larvae are generally dirty white to light grey and up to one inch long. They can only be found in pitch masses, under bark or in new shoots. Symptoms and Effects: Zimmerman pine moth larvae tunnel into new growth causing shoot dieback, or into whorl areas causing masses of pitch to form at the wound site. Repeated attacks by the larvae cause a weakening at the area of the infestation and make the branches and trunk susceptible to breakage. Life Cycle: Zimmerman pine moth has a one-year life cycle and spends the winter as a young caterpillar underneath bark scales of infested trees. In mid to late April, larvae become active and they migrate to the base of branches or shoots and burrow inside. Larvae continue to feed into July and then pupate within a chamber in a mass of pitch.
    [Show full text]
  • Shade Tree Borers No
    I N S E C T S E R I E S TREES & SHRUBS Shade Tree Borers no. 5.530 by W.S. Cranshaw and D.A. Leatherman 1 Shade tree borers are insects that develop underneath the bark of woody plants. Most of these insects can attack only dying trees, felled logs or trees under stress. Stress to woody plants may be the result of mechanical injury, recent transplanting, overwatering or drought. These borers often are incorrectly blamed Quick Facts... for damage caused by a pre-existing condition or injury. Certain borers, in particular the “clear-wing borers,” are capable of damaging apparently healthy trees. Shade tree borers are insects that develop underneath the Life History and Habits bark of trees and shrubs. Certain A large number of beetles and moths develop as wood borers in their beetles and moths are the most immature (larval) stage. When full-grown, typically in one to two years, the adult common borers. stages cut a hole through the bark and emerge. Many of the adult borers, particularly the longhorned beetles and Most shade tree borers can metallic wood borers, feed on pollen, tender bark or leaves but do not cause any successfully attack only trees significant injury. The adult stage is mostly spent flying to new host trees, mating that are injured or stressed. and laying eggs. Eggs of most shade tree borers are laid on the bark, usually within small Shade tree borer development cracks. Longhorned beetles and horntails deposit their eggs underneath bark. takes from one to three years to Eggs typically hatch within one to two weeks, and the newly emerged complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Names Working-2008Jan
    correct scientific Final Final submission Subfa name (if different WFI common ESC common ESA common Submitted to Submitted to Accepted Assigned to: ID Order Family mily WFI scientific name from WFI) name name name CABI name info? WFIWC: ESA/ESC: Name GROUP 000: Official common name in ESA and ESC are COMPLETED and is same as that in WFI (take off list) need change? bronze poplar bronze poplar bronze poplar 1026-Bup Coleoptera Buprestidae Agrilus liragus Barter and Brown Agrilus granulatus borer borer borer poplar-and-willow poplar-and-willow poplar-and-willow Coleoptera Curculionidae Cryptorhynchus [Sternochetus] lapathi (L.) borer borer borer Coleoptera Curculionidae Nemocestes incomptus (Horn) woods weevil woods weevil wood weevil cooley spruce gall adelgid; douglas fir adelges; sitka Cooley spruce Cooley spruce Cooley spruce spruce gall aphid; gall aphid gall aphid gall aphid spruce gall aphid, Homoptera Adelgidae Adelges cooleyi (Gillette) (adelgid) (adelgid) (adelgid) blue GROUP 00: One of the names in ESA, ESC or WFI differs (Decide by case; likely change highlighted name) ponderosa pine ponderosa pine approved 1989 Lepidoptera Pyralidae Dioryctria auranticella (Grote) pine coneworm coneworm coneworm rough strawberry rough strawberry rough strawberry rough strawberry root weevil; rough Coleoptera Curculionidae Otiorhynchus rugosostriatus (Goeze) root weevil weevil root weevil strawberry weevil western conifer western conifer- western conifer- western conifer- approved 1989 Hemiptera Coreidae Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann seed
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalist April 2013 1082
    April 2013 Volume 138 Number 1082 Yorkshire Union The Naturalist Vol. 138 No. 1082 April 2013 Contents Page Editorial 1 John Newbould: President of the YNU 2012-2013 2 Aqua�c plants in Yorkshire canals R. Goulder 4 An interes�ng plant gall on Gorse Derek Parkinson 16 Andricus gemmeus – a new gall for Yorkshire Tom Higginbo�om 17 A provisional Vascular Plant Red Data List for VC63 ‐ an evalua�on of current status 18 G.T.D. Wilmore The Gledhow Valley Woods Nest Box Scheme Mar�n Calvert 31 Onset of Summer Plumage in Black‐headed Gulls at Doncaster Lakeside, based on 35 field observa�ons January to March 2012* Colin A. Howes and John A. Porter Notes on Sowerby’s Beaked Whale strandings on the Yorkshire coast* 38 D.E. Whi�aker Seals at Teesmouth: a historical review Colin A. Howes and Robert Woods 42 Rosemary Beetle Chrysolina americana ‐ a new beetle record for Mid‐west Yorkshire 49 G. Boyd Field Note ‐ Rhododendron lea�opper in VC64 Mark Darwell and John Bowers 50 Recording in VC65 July 2012 John Newbould, Adrian Norris and Bill Ely 52 Botanical Report for 2012 Phyl Abbo� 62 YNU Excursions 2013 70 Project: The Yorkshire Flat Hedgehog Survey Colin A. Howes 78 Project: Parasi�sm of Coleophora serratella Derek Parkinson 79 YNU Calendar April ‐ August 2013 80 Book review: p77 YNU No�ce: p79 An asterix* indicates a peer‐reviewed paper Front cover: Hound’s‐tongue Cynoglossum officinale, one of the rare na�ve plants proposed for VC63’s Red Data List of plants (see p21).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Invasive Potential of an Exotic Scale Insect Associated with Annual Christmas Tree Harvest and Distribution in the Southeastern U.S
    Trees, Forests and People 2 (2020) 100013 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Trees, Forests and People journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tfp Evaluating the invasive potential of an exotic scale insect associated with annual Christmas tree harvest and distribution in the southeastern U.S. Adam G. Dale a,∗, Travis Birdsell b, Jill Sidebottom c a University of Florida, Entomology and Nematology Department, Gainesville, FL 32611 b North Carolina State University, NC Cooperative Extension, Ashe County, NC c North Carolina State University, College of Natural Resources, Mountain Horticultural Crops Research and Extension Center, Mills River, NC 28759 a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Keywords: The movement of invasive species is a global threat to ecosystems and economies. Scale insects (Hemiptera: Forest entomology Coccoidea) are particularly well-suited to avoid detection, invade new habitats, and escape control efforts. In Fiorinia externa countries that celebrate Christmas, the annual movement of Christmas trees has in at least one instance been Elongate hemlock scale associated with the invasion of a scale insect pest and subsequent devastation of indigenous forest species. In the Conifers eastern United States, except for Florida, Fiorinia externa is a well-established exotic scale insect pest of keystone Fraser fir hemlock species and Fraser fir Christmas trees. Annually, several hundred thousand Fraser firs are harvested and shipped into Florida, USA for sale to homeowners and businesses. There is concern that this insect may disperse from Christmas trees and establish on Florida conifers of economic and conservation interest. Here, we investigate the invasive potential of F.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • Program Book
    NORTH CENTRAL BRANCH Entomological Society of America 59th Annual Meeting March 28-31, 2004 President Rob Wiedenmann The Fairmont Kansas City At the Plaza 401 Ward Parkway Kansas City, MO 64112 Contents Meeting Logistics ................................................................ 2 2003-2004 Officers and Committees, ESA-NCB .............. 4 2004 North Central Branch Award Recipients ................ 8 Program ............................................................................. 13 Sunday, March 28, 2004 Afternoon ...............................................................13 Evening ..................................................................13 Monday, March 29, 2004 Morning..................................................................14 Afternoon ...............................................................23 Evening ..................................................................42 Tuesday, March 30, 2004 Morning..................................................................43 Afternoon ...............................................................63 Evening ..................................................................67 Wednesday, March 31, 2004 Morning..................................................................68 Afternoon ...............................................................72 Author Index ..............................................................73 Taxonomic Index........................................................84 Key Word Index.........................................................88
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
    Chapter 1 Introduction Chapterl Page 1 1.1 Introduction Chir pine scientifically known as Pinus roxburghii (family Coniferae) is one of the six Pinus species of India and the most widely occurring. It is also known as Himalayan long needle pine, long leaved Indian pine, Indian chir pine, chir or chil. Chir pine (Pinus roxburghii), is the dominant species native of the inter-ranges and principal valleys of the Himalaya. It begins from Afghanistan in the west and ends in Bhutan in the east and extends through countries like Pakistan, India and Nepal. In India its natural forests are found in Jammu and Kashmir, Haryana, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh, parts of Sikkim, West Bengal and Arunachal Pradesh. The total area under chir forests is estimated to be 8, 90,000 hectares which occurs between 450 m to 2300 m altitude. It forms pure forests in its habitat but in its upper and lower limits occurs mixed with other conifers and broad leaved species, though rarely, in its upper limits it is found in association with deodar, kail, ban oak, burans (Rhododendron) etc., and in the lower limits with sal, sain, khair, harada, bahera, amla, jamun etc. Besides Chir pine other indigenous pines which are present in Indian subcontinent are P. gerardiana, P. wallichiana, P.kesiya, P.bhutanica, and P.merkusii (Ginwal et.al, 2009), all belong to family Abitaceae or Pinaceae of order coniferals. Classification of Genus Pinus : Kingdom : Plantae Division : Pinophyta Class : Pinopsida Order : Pinales / Coniferals Family : Pinacea/Abitaceae Genus : Pinus The pines have been traced back in the geological history to Jurassic period (150 million years) reaching their climax in the tertiary period (60 million years).
    [Show full text]