DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Instructions for The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Instructions for The FIELD INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE URBAN INVENTORY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 2017 FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS RESOURCE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION USDA FOREST SERVICE Note to User: URBAN FIA Field Guide 7.1 is based on the National CORE Field Guide, Version 7.1. Data elements are national CORE unless indicated as follows: • National CORE data elements that end in “+U” (e.g., x.x+U) have had values,codes, or text added, changed, or adjusted from the CORE program. Any additional URBAN FIA text for a national CORE data element is hi-lighted or shown as an "Urban Note". • All URBAN FIA data elements end in “U” (e.g., x.xU). The text for an URBAN FIA data element is not hi- lighted and does not have a corresponding variable in CORE. • URBAN FIA electronic file notes: • national CORE data elements that are not applicable in URBAN FIA are formatted as light gray or light gray hidden text. • hyperlink cross-references are included for various sections, figures, and tables. *National CORE data elements retain their national CORE field guide data element/variable number but may not retain their national CORE field guide location or sequence within the guide. pg.3 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION . 11 SECTION 1.1 URBAN OVERVIEW. .11 SECTION 1.2 FIELD GUIDE LAYOUT . 12 SECTION 1.3 UNITS OF MEASURE . 12 CHAPTER 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION . 13 SECTION 2.1 PLOT SETUP . 15 SECTION 2.2 PLOT INTEGRITY . 15 SECTION 2.3 PLOT MONUMENTATION . 15 ITEM 2.3.0.1 MONUMENT TYPE (CORE 0.3.1U) . 15 ITEM 2.3.0.2 MONUMENT NUMBER (CORE 0.3.2U) . 16 ITEM 2.3.0.3 SUBPLOT / MICROPLOT NUMBER (CORE 0.3.3U) . 16 ITEM 2.3.0.4 SUBPLOT / MICROPLOT OFFSET POINT (CORE 0.3.4U). 16 ITEM 2.3.0.5 WITNESS OBJECT / SP / RP TYPE (CORE 0.3.5U) . 17 ITEM 2.3.0.6 WITNESS OBJECT / SP / RP SPECIES (CORE 0.3.6U) . 17 ITEM 2.3.0.7 OBJECT DESCRIPTION (CORE 0.3.7U) . 17 ITEM 2.3.0.8 MONUMENT AZIMUTH (CORE 0.3.8U) . 17 ITEM 2.3.0.9 MONUMENT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (CORE 0.3.9U) . 18 ITEM 2.3.0.10 MONUMENT DBH / DRC (CORE 0.3.10U). 18 CHAPTER 3 PLOT LEVEL DATA. 19 ITEM 3.0.0.1 CYCLE (CORE 1.0.1U) . 19 ITEM 3.0.0.2 SUB-CYCLE (CORE 1.0.2U). 19 ITEM 3.0.0.3 STATE (CORE 1.1) . 19 ITEM 3.0.0.4 COUNTY (CORE 1.2) . 19 ITEM 3.0.0.5 PLOT NUMBER (CORE 1.3). 20 ITEM 3.0.0.6 URBAN PLOT STATUS (CORE 1.4+U) . 20 ITEM 3.0.0.7 URBAN PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON (CORE 1.7+U). 20 ITEM 3.0.0.8 SAMPLE KIND (CORE 1.10+U) . 21 ITEM 3.0.0.9 PREVIOUS PLOT NUMBER (URBAN OPTIONAL) (CORE 1.11) . 21 SECTION 3.1 CURRENT DATE . 21 ITEM 3.1.0.1 YEAR (CORE 1.13.1) . 21 ITEM 3.1.0.2 MONTH (CORE 1.13.2). 22 ITEM 3.1.0.3 DAY (CORE 1.13.3) . 22 ITEM 3.1.0.4 DECLINATION (URBAN OPTIONAL) (CORE 1.14) . 22 ITEM 3.1.0.5 HORIZONTAL DISTANCE TO IMPROVED ROAD (CORE 1.15+U) . 22 ITEM 3.1.0.6 WATER ON PLOT (CORE 1.16+U) . 23 ITEM 3.1.0.7 QA STATUS (CORE 1.17) . 23 ITEM 3.1.0.8 CREW NUMBER (CORE 1.18) . 24 Table of Contents Table SECTION 3.2 GPS COORDINATES . 24 SUBSECTION 3.2.1 GPS UNIT SETTINGS, DATUM, AND COORDINATE SYSTEM . .24 SUBSECTION 3.2.2 REALTIME PLOT CENTER GPS COORDINATES . .24 ITEM 3.2.2.1 SURVEY GRADE GPS SUBPLOT ROVER FILES COLLECTED (PNW) . 24 ITEM 3.2.2.2 GPS UNIT (CORE 1.19.3). 25 ITEM 3.2.2.3 GPS SERIAL NUMBER (CORE 1.19.4) . .25 ITEM 3.2.2.4 GPS ENTRY METHOD (CORE 1.19.5) . 25 ITEM 3.2.2.5 GPS DATUM (CORE 1.19.6) . 25 ITEM 3.2.2.6 COORDINATE SYSTEM (CORE 1.19.7) . 25 pg.4 ITEM 3.2.2.7 GPS LOCATION TYPE (PNW) . 26 ITEM 3.2.2.8 UTM ZONE (URBAN OPTIONAL) (CORE1.19.10). 26 ITEM 3.2.2.9 EASTING (X) UTM (URBAN OPTIONAL) (CORE 1.19.11) . 26 ITEM 3.2.2.10 NORTHING (Y) UTM (URBAN OPTIONAL) (CORE 1.19.12). 26 SUBSECTION 3.2.3 CORRECTION FOR "OFFSET" GPS LOCATION . .27 ITEM 3.2.3.1 AZIMUTH TO PLOT CENTER (CORE 1.19.14) . 27 ITEM 3.2.3.2 DISTANCE TO PLOT CENTER (CORE 1.19.15) . 27 ITEM 3.2.3.3 COORDINATE DIFFERENCE (CORE 1.19.15.1U) . 27 ITEM 3.2.3.4 GPS ELEVATION (CORE 1.19.16). 27 ITEM 3.2.3.5 GPS ERROR (CORE 1.19.17) . 28 ITEM 3.2.3.6 NUMBER OF READINGS (CORE 1.19.18) . 28 ITEM 3.2.3.7 GPS FILE NAME (CORE OPTIONAL 1.19.19). 28 ITEM 3.2.3.8 PLOT NOTES (CORE 1.21) . 28 ITEM 3.2.3.9 SAFETY (CORE 1.21.1U) . 29 ITEM 3.2.3.10 SAFETY DESCRIPTION (CORE 1.21.1.1U). 29 ITEM 3.2.3.11 INVASIVE PLANT SAMPLING STATUS (CORE 1.23+U) . 29 ITEM 3.2.3.12 INVASIVE PLANT SPECIMEN COLLECTION RULE (CORE 1.24) . 30 CHAPTER 4 CONDITION CLASS . 31 SECTION 4.1 DETERMINATION OF CONDITION CLASS . 31 SECTION 4.2 CONDITION CLASS STATUS DEFINITIONS . 31 SECTION 4.3 CONDITION CLASS ATTRIBUTES . 35 SUBSECTION 4.3.1 FOREST LAND . .35 SUBSECTION 4.3.2 URBAN NONFOREST LAND . .36 SECTION 4.4 DELINEATING CONDITION CLASSES DIFFERING IN CONDITION CLASS STATUS . 36 ITEM 4.4.0.1 CONDITION CLASS NUMBER (CORE 2.4.1) . 39 ITEM 4.4.0.2 URBAN CONDITION CLASS STATUS (CORE 2.4.2+U) . 39 ITEM 4.4.0.3 URBAN CONDITION NONSAMPLED REASON (CORE 2.4.3+U). 39 SECTION 4.5 DELINEATING CONDITION CLASSES WITHIN ACCESSIBLE FOREST LAND . 40 ITEM 4.5.0.1 URBAN RESERVED STATUS (CORE 2.5.1+U) . 43 ITEM 4.5.0.2 URBAN OWNER GROUP (CORE 2.5.2 +U) . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Caterpillars – the Threat
    Caterpillars – The threat •Plant health •Site conditions •Abundance of pest •Client Concerns •Regulatory Concerns Pesticides for Caterpillars Biologicals Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) Spinosad (Conserve, Fertilome etc) Insect Growth Regulators Diflubenzuron = Dimilin Fenoxycarb = Precision Tebufenozide = Confirm Pyriproxifen = Distance Neem, Azadirachtin Pyrethroids- Rescue Treatments Bifenthrin (Talstar) Cyfluthrin (Decathalon) Deltamethrin (Deltagard) Fluvalinate (Mavrik) Lamda -Cyhalothrin (Scimitar, Battle) Permethrin (Astro, Spectracide) Oldies but goodies… Carbaryl (Sevin) Acephate (Orthene) Tips For Bagworms, Fall Webworms and other large caterpillars Most pesticides kill caterpillars that are <1” long Spinosad kills largest stages, Pyrethroids are second best Pyrethroids are contact insecticides and useful for killing FWW blown out of webs. Caterpillar Pests- How much injury do they inflict? •Types- Exposed, Concealed •Abundance – Solitary, or Gregarious? •Host Range – What do they eat? •Number of Generations /Year •Abundance of Natural Enemies Concealed Defoliators Mimosa webworm Fall webworm Eastern tent caterpillar Bagworm Leaf crumpler Mimosa Webworm Damage Close-up of webbed branch Webs and Frass of Mimosa Webworm Caterpillar Mimosa Webworm Caterpillar (Late Stage) Overwintering Stage (Pupa) Mimosa Webworm Adult Fall Webworm Fall webworm caterpillar Adult Fall Webworm Adult and Egg Mass of Fall Webworm Eastern Tent Caterpillar Webs on Trees Close-up of Eastern Tent Caterpillar Egg Mass of Eastern Tent
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Forests 2014
    United States Department of Agriculture Michigan Forests 2014 Forest Service Northern Resource Bulletin Publication Date Research Station NRS-110 April 2017 Abstract The eighth inventory of Michigan’s forests, completed in 2014, describes more than 20.3 million acres of forest land. The data in this report are based on visits to 4,289 forested plots from 2009 to 2014. Timberland accounts for 95 percent of this forest land, and 62 percent is privately owned. The sugar maple/beech/yellow birch forest type accounts for 19 percent of the State’s forest land, followed by aspen (12 percent) and white oak/red oak/hickory (7 percent). Balsam fir, red maple, and sugar maple are the three most common species by number of trees. Growing-stock volume on timberland has continued to increase and now totals about 30.2 billion cubic feet (ft3). The associated net growth, harvest removals, and mortality totaled 674, 313, and 303 million ft3/ year, respectively. In addition to information on forest attributes, this report includes data on forest health, land use change, family forest owners, timber-product outputs, and future forests. Detailed information on forest inventory methods, data quality estimates, and important resource statistics can be found online at https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-RB-110. Acknowledgments We thank the field crew for their hard work and dedication while collecting the information that is the basis for this report. Special thanks also go to Mark Hatfield, Paul Sowers, John Vissage, Barry Wilson, Barb O’Connell, Charles Barnett, and Dale Gormanson who also contributed to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Spore Prints
    SPORE PRINTS BULLETIN OF THE PUGET SOUND MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY Number 473 June 2011 OLDEST, ODDEST FUNGI FINALLY “The big message here is that most fungi and most fungal diversity PHOTOGRAPHED Susan Milius reside in fungi that have neither been collected nor cultivated,” Science News, May 12, 2011 says John W. Taylor of the University of California, Berkeley. Exeter team member Meredith Jones spotted the hard-to-detect organisms by marking them with fluorescent tags. The trick re- vealed fungal cells attached to algal cells as if parasitizing them. M. Jones One of the big questions about early fungi is whether they might have arisen from “some kind of parasitic ancestor like Rozella,” says Rytas Vilgalys of Duke University. Interesting, yes. But loosening the definition of fungi to include organisms without chitin walls could wreak havoc in the concept of that group, objects Robert Lücking of the Field Museum in Chicago. “I would actually conclude, based on the evidence, that these are not fungi,” he says. Instead, they might be near rela- tives—an almost-fungus. Two fungal cells, possibly from an ancient lineage, each show a curvy, taillike flagellum (red) during a mobile stage in their life cycle. IS MUTATED FUNGUS KILLING AMERICAN BATS? Andy Coghlan Images of little dots, some wriggling a skinny tail, give scientists New Scientist, May 24, 2011 a first glimpse of a vast swath of the oldest, and perhaps oddest, fungal group alive today. A fungus blamed for killing more than a mil- The first views suggest that, unlike any other fungi known, these lion bats in the US since 2006 has been found might live as essentially naked cells without the rigid cell wall to differ only slightly from an apparently that supposedly defines a fungus, says Tom Richards of the Natu- harmless European version.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Classification of Trametes
    TAXON 60 (6) • December 2011: 1567–1583 Justo & Hibbett • Phylogenetic classification of Trametes SYSTEMATICS AND PHYLOGENY Phylogenetic classification of Trametes (Basidiomycota, Polyporales) based on a five-marker dataset Alfredo Justo & David S. Hibbett Clark University, Biology Department, 950 Main St., Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Alfredo Justo, [email protected] Abstract: The phylogeny of Trametes and related genera was studied using molecular data from ribosomal markers (nLSU, ITS) and protein-coding genes (RPB1, RPB2, TEF1-alpha) and consequences for the taxonomy and nomenclature of this group were considered. Separate datasets with rDNA data only, single datasets for each of the protein-coding genes, and a combined five-marker dataset were analyzed. Molecular analyses recover a strongly supported trametoid clade that includes most of Trametes species (including the type T. suaveolens, the T. versicolor group, and mainly tropical species such as T. maxima and T. cubensis) together with species of Lenzites and Pycnoporus and Coriolopsis polyzona. Our data confirm the positions of Trametes cervina (= Trametopsis cervina) in the phlebioid clade and of Trametes trogii (= Coriolopsis trogii) outside the trametoid clade, closely related to Coriolopsis gallica. The genus Coriolopsis, as currently defined, is polyphyletic, with the type species as part of the trametoid clade and at least two additional lineages occurring in the core polyporoid clade. In view of these results the use of a single generic name (Trametes) for the trametoid clade is considered to be the best taxonomic and nomenclatural option as the morphological concept of Trametes would remain almost unchanged, few new nomenclatural combinations would be necessary, and the classification of additional species (i.e., not yet described and/or sampled for mo- lecular data) in Trametes based on morphological characters alone will still be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest and Diseases in Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) J
    PEST AND DISEASES IN MANGO (MANGIFERA INDICA L.) J. González-Fernández, J.I. Hormaza IHSM la Mayora CSIC-UMA, 29750 Algarrobo, Malaga, Spain EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In this work, we review the most important pests and diseases that affect mango production worldwide as well as the main measures implemented to control them. Pests and diseases are the main factors that can impact sustainable mango fruit production in the tropics and subtropics worldwide. Commercial cultivation of mango, characterized by expansion to new areas, changing crop management, replacement of varieties and increased chemical interventions, has altered significantly the pest and disease community structure in this crop in the different mango producing regions. In addition, climate change is inducing the emergence of new pests and, whereas globalization and trade liberalization have created wide opportunities for mango commercialization growth, at the same time, this can result in faster dispersion of pests and diseases among different mango growing areas if proper sanitary measures are not implemented. This review covers different topics related to pests and diseases in mango. First, a thorough description of the main pests and diseases that affect mango is provided. Second, the different approaches used in different mango producing countries for chemical and biological control are described. Third, recommendations for appropriate mango management techiques that include integrated pest and disease management, reduction in the use of chemicals and the implementation of a good monitoring and surveillance system to help control the main pests and diseases, are also discussed. Finally, the current knowledge on agrohomeopathy and Korean Natural Farming is analyzed and recommendations on future lines of research to optimize mango pest and disease control are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Juglans Nigra Juglandaceae L
    Juglans nigra L. Juglandaceae LOCAL NAMES English (walnut,American walnut,eastern black walnut,black walnut); French (noyer noir); German (schwarze Walnuß); Portuguese (nogueira- preta); Spanish (nogal negro,nogal Americano) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Black walnut is a deciduous tree that grows to a height of 46 m but ordinarily grows to around 25 m and up to 102 cm dbh. Black walnut develops a long, smooth trunk and a small rounded crown. In the open, the trunk forks low with a few ascending and spreading coarse branches. (Robert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA NRCS. The root system usually consists of a deep taproot and several wide- 1995. Northeast wetland flora: Field office spreading lateral roots. guide to plant species) Leaves alternate, pinnately compound, 30-70 cm long, up to 23 leaflets, leaflets are up to 13 cm long, serrated, dark green with a yellow fall colour in autumn and emits a pleasant sweet though resinous smell when crushed or bruised. Flowers monoecious, male flowers catkins, small scaley, cone-like buds; female flowers up to 8-flowered spikes. Fruit a drupe-like nut surrounded by a fleshy, indehiscent exocarp. The nut has a rough, furrowed, hard shell that protects the edible seed. Fruits Bark (Robert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA NRCS. 1995. Northeast wetland flora: Field office produced in clusters of 2-3 and borne on the terminals of the current guide to plant species) season's growth. The seed is sweet, oily and high in protein. The bitter tasting bark on young trees is dark and scaly becoming darker with rounded intersecting ridges on maturity. BIOLOGY Flowers begin to appear mid-April in the south and progressively later until early June in the northern part of the natural range.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalist April 2013 1082
    April 2013 Volume 138 Number 1082 Yorkshire Union The Naturalist Vol. 138 No. 1082 April 2013 Contents Page Editorial 1 John Newbould: President of the YNU 2012-2013 2 Aqua�c plants in Yorkshire canals R. Goulder 4 An interes�ng plant gall on Gorse Derek Parkinson 16 Andricus gemmeus – a new gall for Yorkshire Tom Higginbo�om 17 A provisional Vascular Plant Red Data List for VC63 ‐ an evalua�on of current status 18 G.T.D. Wilmore The Gledhow Valley Woods Nest Box Scheme Mar�n Calvert 31 Onset of Summer Plumage in Black‐headed Gulls at Doncaster Lakeside, based on 35 field observa�ons January to March 2012* Colin A. Howes and John A. Porter Notes on Sowerby’s Beaked Whale strandings on the Yorkshire coast* 38 D.E. Whi�aker Seals at Teesmouth: a historical review Colin A. Howes and Robert Woods 42 Rosemary Beetle Chrysolina americana ‐ a new beetle record for Mid‐west Yorkshire 49 G. Boyd Field Note ‐ Rhododendron lea�opper in VC64 Mark Darwell and John Bowers 50 Recording in VC65 July 2012 John Newbould, Adrian Norris and Bill Ely 52 Botanical Report for 2012 Phyl Abbo� 62 YNU Excursions 2013 70 Project: The Yorkshire Flat Hedgehog Survey Colin A. Howes 78 Project: Parasi�sm of Coleophora serratella Derek Parkinson 79 YNU Calendar April ‐ August 2013 80 Book review: p77 YNU No�ce: p79 An asterix* indicates a peer‐reviewed paper Front cover: Hound’s‐tongue Cynoglossum officinale, one of the rare na�ve plants proposed for VC63’s Red Data List of plants (see p21).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and Evolutionary Correlates of Novel Secondary Sexual Structures
    Zootaxa 3729 (1): 001–062 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3729.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CA0C1355-FF3E-4C67-8F48-544B2166AF2A ZOOTAXA 3729 Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures JASON J. DOMBROSKIE1,2,3 & FELIX A. H. SPERLING2 1Cornell University, Comstock Hall, Department of Entomology, Ithaca, NY, USA, 14853-2601. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, T6G 2E9 3Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by J. Brown: 2 Sept. 2013; published: 25 Oct. 2013 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 JASON J. DOMBROSKIE & FELIX A. H. SPERLING Phylogeny of the tribe Archipini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Tortricinae) and evolutionary correlates of novel secondary sexual structures (Zootaxa 3729) 62 pp.; 30 cm. 25 Oct. 2013 ISBN 978-1-77557-288-6 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-289-3 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2013 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2013 Magnolia Press 2 · Zootaxa 3729 (1) © 2013 Magnolia Press DOMBROSKIE & SPERLING Table of contents Abstract . 3 Material and methods . 6 Results . 18 Discussion . 23 Conclusions . 33 Acknowledgements . 33 Literature cited . 34 APPENDIX 1. 38 APPENDIX 2. 44 Additional References for Appendices 1 & 2 . 49 APPENDIX 3. 51 APPENDIX 4. 52 APPENDIX 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) W
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Technical Bulletins Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station 5-1-1972 TB55: Food Lists of Hippodamia (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) W. L. Vaundell R. H. Storch Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/aes_techbulletin Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Vaundell, W.L. and R.H. Storch. 1972. Food lists of Hippodamia (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Life Sciences and Agriculture Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 55. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Technical Bulletins by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Food Lists of Hippodamia (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) W.L. Vaundell R.H. Storch UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT ORONO LIFE SCIENCES AND AGRICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION MAY 1972 ABSTRACT Food lists for Hippodamia Iredecimpunctata (Linnaeus) and the genus Hippodamia as reported in the literature are given. A complete list of citations is included. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors are indebted to Dr. G. W. Simpson (Life Sciences Agriculture Experiment Station) for critically reading the manus and to Drs. M. E. MacGillivray (Canada Department of Agricull and G. W. Simpson for assistance in the nomenclature of the Aphid Research reported herein was supported by Hatch Funds. Food List of Hippodamia (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) W. L. Vaundell1 and R. H. Storch The larval and adult coccinellids of the subfamily Coccinellinae, except for the Psylloborini, are predaceous (Arnett, 1960). The possi­ ble use of lady beetles to aid in the control of arthropod pests has had cosmopolitan consideration, for example, Britton 1914, Lipa and Sem'yanov 1967, Rojas 1967, and Sacharov 1915.
    [Show full text]