DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey M2 Associates Inc. 56 Country Acres Drive Hampton, New Jersey 08827 (908) 238-0827 EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY,NEW JERSEY NOVEMBER 8, 2005 Prepared for: Greenwich Township Planning Board 321 Greenwich Street Stewartsville, New Jersey 08886 Prepared by: Matthew J. Mulhall, P.G. M2 Associates Inc. 56 Country Acres Drive Hampton, New Jersey 08827 (908) 238-0827 EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY,NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 5 LOCATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 POPULATION DENSITY.................................................................................................... 6 PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE ............................................................................................ 6 TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ 6 SURFACE WATER .......................................................................................................... 7 Watersheds............................................................................................................. 7 Stream Classifications........................................................................................... 8 SOILS ......................................................................................................................... 10 BEDROCK.................................................................................................................... 13 STRUCTURE................................................................................................................. 16 Secondary Porosity ............................................................................................. 16 Faults .................................................................................................................... 17 GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 19 STORAGE AND TRANSMISSION CAPABILITY.................................................................... 19 PRECAMBRIAN IGNEOUS AND METAMORPHIC ROCKS/HARDYSTON QUARTZITE................. 19 Location ................................................................................................................ 19 Poor Ranking........................................................................................................ 20 Fractures............................................................................................................... 21 Yields/Depths ....................................................................................................... 21 Specific Capacities .............................................................................................. 22 Summary............................................................................................................... 22 CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN CARBONATE ROCKS................................................................ 23 LOCATION ................................................................................................................... 23 Fractures/Solution Openings .............................................................................. 23 Easily Contaminated............................................................................................ 23 Yields .................................................................................................................... 24 Depths................................................................................................................... 24 Specific Capacities .............................................................................................. 25 Public Community Wells ..................................................................................... 25 Summary............................................................................................................... 25 Reservoir Capacity............................................................................................... 26 HYDROGEOLOGIC ZONES ............................................................................................. 26 AQUIFER RECHARGE.................................................................................................... 27 Hydrologic Cycle.................................................................................................. 27 ii WATER BALANCE............................................................................................. 27 PRECIPITATION ................................................................................................ 29 SURFACE-WATER RUNOFF ............................................................................ 30 EVAPOTRANSPIRATION .................................................................................. 32 GROUNDWATER RUNOFF............................................................................... 33 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 35 Groundwater Recharge........................................................................................ 36 GROUNDWATER............................................................................................... 36 BASEFLOW........................................................................................................ 36 HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION.......................................................................... 37 POSTEN (1984) METHOD................................................................................. 38 7Q10/MA7CD10 ................................................................................................. 39 NJGS MODIFIED METHOD............................................................................... 40 AQUIFER VERSUS “GROUNDWATER” RECHARGE .................................................. 40 SOIL RECHARGE RATES..................................................................................... 41 Groundwater Recharge Rates............................................................................. 42 PRECAMBRIAN IGNEOUS AND METAMORPHIC ZONE ................................ 42 CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN CARBONATE ROCK ZONE ................................... 43 WATER SUPPLY.......................................................................................................... 44 DEMAND ..................................................................................................................... 44 DEPENDABLE YIELD..................................................................................................... 44 Definition............................................................................................................... 44 Maintainable Yield................................................................................................ 45 Planning Threshold.............................................................................................. 47 Available Dependable Yield................................................................................. 47 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................ 48 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 55 TABLES 1. Watersheds, Subwatersheds, Streams, and Surface-Water Classifications in Greenwich Township. 2. Types, Slopes, Approximate Areas, and Septic Limitations of Soils in Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. 3. Normal Rainfall and Mean Temperature For Greenwich Township As Determined from Measurements Recorded by National Climatic Data Center. 4. Soil Recharge Calculations Made with NJDEP Model DGS02-06 for Soil Types in Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. 5. Normal and Drought Condition Recharge Rates for Hydrogeologic Zones. iii 6. Dependable Yields for Hydrogeologic Zones. 7. Recharge Volumes and Dependable Yields for Hydrogeologic Zones. FIGURES 1. Location of Greenwich Township and Warren County, New Jersey. 2. Location of Highlands Water Protection & Planning Act Zones in Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. 3. Water Purveyors and Regulated Wells in Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. 4. Watersheds in Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. 5. Subwatersheds and Stream Classifications in Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. 6. Soils Beneath Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. 7. Bedrock Geology Beneath Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. 8. Hydrogeologic Zones within Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. APPENDIX A. Summary Table of Well Record Details for Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey. EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY,NEW JERSEY INTRODUCTION Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey retained M2 Associates in May 2005 to conduct an evaluation of the groundwater resources of the Township. The location of Greenwich Township and Warren County in New Jersey are shown
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Resources of Oley Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania Were Studied by the U.S
    WATER RESOURCES OF OLEY TOWNSHIP, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA By Gary N. Paulachok and Charles R. Wood U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4065 Prepared in cooperation with the OLEY TOWNSHIP SUPERVISORS Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 4th Floor, Federal Building Federal Center P.O. Box 1107 Box 25425 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1107 Denver, Colorado 80225 ii CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................ 1 Introduction............................................................ 2 Purpose and scope................................................... 2 Description of area................................................. 2 Physical and cultural setting.................................. 2 Climate and precipitation...................................... 4 Geologic setting............................................... 5 Water supply and wastewater treatment............................... 6 We11-numbering system............................................... 7 Geologic names and aquifer codes.................................... 7 Acknowledgments..................................................... 8 Surface-water resources................................................. 8 Drainage basins and streamflow.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Warren County Transportation Plan
    Technical Memorandum 2: Needs Assessment Warren County Transportation Plan Tech Memo 2.1 Previous Studies Tech Memo 2.2 Equity Assessment Tech Memo 2.3 WikiMap Tech Memo 2.4 Data Assessment JANUARY 2021 Technical Memorandum 2.1: Previous Studies Warren County Transportation Plan SEPTEMBER 2020 Technical Memorandum 2.1 Previous Studies Contents Warren County Transportation Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 Liberty Township Master Plan ................................................................................................................. 3 Warren County Strategic Growth Plan-Transportation Technical Study .................................................... 3 Knowlton Township Master Plan Reexamination Report .......................................................................... 3 Washington Borough Downtown Redevelopment Plan ............................................................................ 4 Phillipsburg Walkable Community Workshop Report ............................................................................... 4 Morris/Warren County Rail Corridor Study .............................................................................................. 4 Phillipsburg Master Plan Reexamination Report ...................................................................................... 4 New Jersey Statewide Freight Plan .......................................................................................................... 5 Plan 2045:
    [Show full text]
  • 40Th NYSGA Annual Meeting 1968
    NEW YORK STATE GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION GUIDEBOOK TO FIELD EXCURSIONS 40TH ANNUAL MEETING 1968 AT QUEENS COLLEGE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YO_RK FLUSHING, NEW YORK GUIDEBOOK to Field Excursions at the 40th Annual Meeting of the New York State Geological Association May 1968 Robert M. Finks, Editor Host: Department of Geology Queens College of The City University of New York Copies of this guidebook may be purchased from the Permanent Secretary, New York State Geological Association. Address Prof. Philip Hewitt, Department of Geology, State University College at Brockport, N. Y. 2 The organizer of the field trips described in this volume, and of the meeting at which they were given, is Professor Walter S. Newman President, NYSGA, 1968 3 CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Eugene A. Alexandrov, Queens College G. D. Bennett, U. S. Geological Survey Robert M. Finks, Queens College Leo M. Hall, University of Massachusetts David H. Krinsley, Queens College David J. Leveson, Brooklyn College James P. Minard, U. S. Geological Survey Walter S. Newman, Queens College James P. Owens, U. S. Geological Survey F. J. Pearson, U. S. Geological Survey N. M. Perlmutter, U. S. Geological Survey Nicholas M. Ratcliffe, City College E. Lynn Savage, Brooklyn College Carl K. Seyfert, Buffalo State University College Leslie A. Sirkin, Adelphi University Norman F. Sohl, U. S. Geological Survey David L. Thurber, Queens College Franklyn B. Van Houten, Princeton University 4 PREFACE The papers brought together in this Guidebook merit comparative reading at leisure, for they often bring to bear upon problems of the local geology many independent lines of evidence. Some matters that come immediately to mind out of personal interest are: (1) The relation of the New York City Group to the unmetamorphosed Cambro­ Ordovician sequence (Trips A, C, E, H).
    [Show full text]
  • JPAS-11-Reduced.Pdf
    PROCEEDINGS I OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VOLUME XI 1 9 3 7 I HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 1937 I CONTENTS PAGE Minutes of the 1936 Summer Meeting ,_....... - ...... ., .. _,_, ___, ___ ............ _.......................................... 5 Minutes of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting ............. - ................... - ........ - ........... - .......................... -... 6 Government Aid Proj()cts in Biology, Homer C. Will and Pressley L. Crummy ......... 13 The Osteology of a 'l'eratological Goose, Marcus H. Green ........................ ................................. ... 18 The Stereids in the Petioles of Nymphea Advcna, Marcus H. Green and Warren S. Buck ....... _ - ...-- ... - ....... - ...................... - ............................. ,....................... _ ............................. -.... 20 The Respiratory Metabolism in the Larvae of the Tobacco Homworm (Phlege- OFFICERS thontius Sexta), Cla1·ence A. Horn .... -...................................................... .............. .. ... ........... ... .. ............... 22 Devonian Nomenclatmc in P ennsylvania, Bradford Willard ..................- ....... _.,,_.,,,. ......... _ 26 1937-38 The Amphibians and Reptiles of Bedford County, Pennsylvania, Thomas H. Knepp 35 ReminisceiiCes of Dr. S. S. Haldeman, George N. C. Henschen ........ _....................................... 36 Notes on Cave Ve1·tebrates, Chnrles E. Mohr ...... _ .. _.. - .. - ......................................... _,..... 38 p 1·esident ..~ : ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geologic Map of the Chester Quadrangle, Morris County, New
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Prepared in cooperation with the BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CHESTER QUADRANGLE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (TRANQUILITY) MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL AND WATER SURVEY NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM OPEN FILE MAP OFM 120 (DOVER) o 74 45' 42'30'' (STANHOPE) 40' 74 o 37'30'' ¹ o ¹ 40 52'30'' ¹ 40 o 52'30'' INTRODUCTION Folds M ¹ ECONOMIC RESOURCES New Jersey Highlands REFERENCES CITED 51 83 EXPLANATION OF MAP SYMBOLS ¹ Ypg U ¹ Sg Folds in Paleozoic rocks of the area postdate the development of bedding and formed during 67 64 Diabase dikes (Neoproterozoic) (Volkert and Puffer, 1995) – Light gray- or brown- Yk ¹ Zd D 53 27 63 ¹ The Chester 7.5-minute quadrangle is situated in the southwest part of Morris County, in the the Taconian and Alleghanian orogenies at about 450 Ma and 250 Ma, respectively. Folds in rocks of 71 ¹ Mesoproterozoic rocks in the Chester quadrangle host economic deposits of iron 82 ish-gray-weathering, dark-greenish-gray, aphanitic to fine-grained dikes. Composed Barnett, S.G., III, 1976, Geology of the Paleozoic rocks of the Green Pond outlier: New Jersey Contact - Dotted where concealed ¹ ? New Jersey Highlands physiographic province. Although the bedrock geology of the quadrangle has been the Green Pond Mountain Region and Valley and Ridge are characterized by a broad, open and upright, ¹ U ore (magnetite) mined predominantly during the 19th century, with most of the important Yd 66 U principally of plagioclase (labradorite to andesine), augite, and ilmenite and (or) Geological Survey Geologic Report Series No.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geologic Map of the Stanhope Quadrangle Morris And
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Prepared in cooperation with the BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE STANHOPE QUADRANGLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES, NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL AND WATER SURVEY NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM OPEN FILE MAP OFM 124 (NEWTON WEST) (FRANKLIN) 74°45’ 42’30” (NEWTON EAST) 40’ 74°37’30” 41°00’ 41°00’ 75 _l 40 65 M 39 24 71 78 Yp 62 64 72 82 A _h 43 U M 41 58 D Ybh Yk Yps 35 44 Ybs 82 72 Ybh 60 _ 60 a 38 56 61 83 T Granite and related rocks of the Byram and Lake Hopatcong Intrusive Suites are widespread and O_bl L CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS REFERENCES CITED 70 70 67 79 U 24 81 61 Ym Ybh 80 abundant in the map area where they intrude rocks of the Losee Suite and supracrustal rocks. The A 49 66 DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS Barnett, S.G., III, 1970, Upper Cayugan and Helderbergian stratigraphy of southeastern New York and F Ya 64 82 Stanhope quadrangle is designated as the type section (location in the Highlands where the rocks are Ybh 76 56 70 Yfw Ya Green Pond Mountain Region northern New Jersey: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 81, p. 2375-2402. M 61 Ybs GREEN POND MOUNTAIN REGION best exposed) for both suites that together comprise the Vernon Supersuite (Volkert and Drake, 1998). 31 Ym Ybh Ya Baum, J.L., 1967, The Tranquility prospect, Sussex County, New Jersey: New Jersey Zinc Company, 54 78 Byram and Lake Hopatcong rocks form a complete differentiation series that includes monzonite and Dkec Kanouse Sandstone, Esopus Formation and Connelly Conglomerate, undivided (Lower Devo- 20 30 Yb unpublished inter-office correspondence on file in the office of the New Jersey Geological 22 17 Ybh 57 Ym 70 nian) 84 Ybs Dkec syenite, quartz monzonite and quartz syenite, granite, and alaskite.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 CFR Ch. I (4–1–20 Edition) § 9.161
    Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury Pt. 9 or the quantity in which to purchase 9.34 Finger Lakes. them for sale to consumers. 9.35 Edna Valley. (b) The industry member obligates 9.36 McDowell Valley. the retailer to participate in the pro- 9.37 California Shenandoah Valley. 9.38 Cienega Valley. motion to obtain the industry mem- 9.39 Paicines. ber’s product. 9.40 Leelanau Peninsula. (c) The retailer has a continuing obli- 9.41 Lancaster Valley. gation to purchase or otherwise pro- 9.42 Cole Ranch. mote the industry member’s product. 9.43 Rocky Knob. (d) The retailer has a commitment 9.44 Solano County Green Valley. not to terminate its relationship with 9.45 Suisun Valley. 9.46 Livermore Valley. the industry member with respect to 9.47 Hudson River Region. purchase of the industry member’s 9.48 Monticello. products. 9.49 Central Delaware Valley. (e) The practice involves the industry 9.50 Temecula Valley. member in the day-to-day operations of 9.51 Isle St. George. the retailer. For example, the industry 9.52 Chalk Hill. member controls the retailer’s deci- 9.53 Alexander Valley. 9.54 Santa Ynez Valley. sions on which brand of products to 9.55 Bell Mountain. purchase, the pricing of products, or 9.56 San Lucas. the manner in which the products will 9.57 Green Valley of Russian River Valley. be displayed on the retailer’s premises. 9.58 Carmel Valley. (f) The practice is discriminatory in 9.59 Arroyo Seco. that it is not offered to all retailers in 9.60 Shenandoah Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Morristown National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service US Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Morristown National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2014/841 ON THE COVER Cannon at Fort Nonsense overlooking Morristown. Photograph by Jared Kofsky (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported [CC BY-SA 3.0] license) available at: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fort_Nonsense_of_Morristown.JPG (accessed 12 August 2014) THIS PAGE Split-rail fence at Jockey Hollow in the winter. Photograph by Daniel Beards, available at: http://albums.phanfare.com/isolated/CUUsqZbg/1/6144461_7039483 (accessed 12 August 2014) Morristown National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2014/841 Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 August 2014 US Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Impracticability Evaluation for the Rodale Manufacturing Site Emmaus, Pennsylvania
    TECHNICAL REPORT Uollvw ^ Technical Impracticability Evaluation for the Rodale Manufacturing Site Emmaus, Pennsylvania Square D Company Palatine, Illinois September 1999 13BI 6723 Towpath Road, P.O. Box 66 Syracuse, New York, 13214-0066 (315)446-9120 AR300787 Table of Contents Section 1. .....1-1 1.1 General ....................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Purpose for Tl Evaluation .......................... 1-1 1.2 Report Organization .............................. 1-1 Section 2. .....2-1 2.1 General ....................................... 2-1 2.2 Site Background and History ....................... 2-1 2.3 Physical Setting of the Site ......................... 2-3 2.3.1 Topography and Ground Cover ................ ..... 2-3 2.3.2 Geology ....................................... 2-4 2.3.3 Hydrogeology ................................... 2-7 2.4 Types and General Distribution of Chemicals of Concern ....................................... 2-8 Section 3. Site-Specific ARARs for Which Waiver Is Requested .........3-1 r \ Section 4. .....4-1 Section 5. 5-1 5.1 Source of Dissolved VOCs and DNAPL ............... 5-1 5.2 Site Geology and Hydrogeology ..................... 5-1 5.2.1 General Hydraulic Gradients and Row Directions ....^8 5.2.2 Transmissh/ity and Hydraulic Conductivity ........ .... 5-7 5.2.3 Stratigraphic, Structural and Hydraulic Conductivity Heterogeneity .................... ....5-8 5.3 Migration and Exposure ...........................5-8 5.3.1 Source Areas and Source Materials .............. ....5-8 5.3.2 Probable DNAPL Zone Boundaries .............. 5-9 5.3.3 Solute Transport ................................ 5-10 5.3.3.1 Nature and Extent of Ground-Water VOC Plume ... 5-10 5.3.3.2 Estimated Dissolved, Sorted, and DNAPL VOC Mass ...................... « ........;•..... 5.11 5.3.3.3 Impact of Matrix Diffusion on Contaminant Fate f and Transport ........
    [Show full text]
  • Physiography, Topography and Geology
    3: PHYSIOGRAPHY, TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY A. Physiography New Jersey can be divided into four regions, known as physiographic provinces, which are areas with similar sequences of rock types, geologic structures and a common geologic history (see Figure 3a). The northwestern section of New Jersey is part of the Valley and Ridge Province, which is characterized by long, parallel ridges and valleys formed by folded and faulted limestones, shales and sandstones of early and middle Paleozoic age. Erosion-resistant sandstone and siltstone bedrock lie beneath the ridges of the Appalachian Mountains while shale and limestone underlie the valleys. Bordering the Valley and Ridge Province to the southeast, the Highlands Province consists of metamorphic rocks of Precambrian age. The granites and gneisses are resistant to erosion and create a hilly upland with deep, steep-sided valleys carved by streams. These folds are seen in the northern half of Holland Township (see Figure 3a). The Highlands Province is separated from the Piedmont Province by a series of major faults which cross Holland Township and reach the Delaware River near Church Road (see Figure 3a). The Piedmont Province is characterized by gently rolling hills. The rocks of the Piedmont are of Late Triassic and Early Jurassic age. As sediments eroded from adjacent uplands, and were deposited along rivers and lakes within the basin, they became compacted and cemented to form conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone and shale. Diabase is a rock formed by the cooling of magma at some depth in the crust (i.e. the magma did not erupt at the surface), while basalt formed when the magma was extruded onto the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Package for Green Acres Pprogram, June 2005
    NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION GREEN ACRES PROGRAM JUNE 2005 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Funding Round 2006A Grants and Loans to Local Governments and Nonprofit Organizations for Open Space Acquisition and Park Development Recommended for Funding to the Garden State Preservation Trust Richard J. Codey Bradley M. Campbell Acting Governor Commissioner 1 The Green Acres Mission To achieve, in partnership with others, a system of interconnected open spaces, whose protection will preserve and enhance New Jersey's natural environment and its historic, scenic, and recreational resources for public use and enjoyment. General Overview The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Green Acres Program was created in 1961 to meet New Jersey's growing recreation and conservation needs. Together with public and private partners, Green Acres has protected more than 568,000 acres of open space and provided hundreds of outdoor recreational facilities in communities around the State. The total acres of protected open space and farmland across the State has exceeded 1.2 million acres. The protection of New Jersey’s environmentally sensitive open space, vital water resources, and significant natural and historic resources is critical to the quality of life enjoyed by all New Jerseyans. Preserved open space protects our water supply, protects sensitive habitats for endangered and threatened species, promotes smart growth, and provides a place for public recreation and connection with community and nature. Quality open space and attractive recreational facilities in cities, suburbs, and other developed communities throughout New Jersey help to improve the quality of life for residents and visitors and help to create an environment where people want to live and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehigh County Has Yielded a Fairly Large Variety of Minerals, Some
    Census of Lehigh Cow@ farms Item 1940 1939 Number of farms ............................. 2,074 2,325 Full owners ...... \ .......................... 1,488 1,731 Part owners ............................... 192 74 Managers ................................. 31 74 All tenants ............................... 363 446 Value of farms (land and buildings) .......... .$13,709,179 $21,81)6,2’91 All land in farms, acres ....................... 152,385 160’,314 Aver,age acre,age per farm ..................... 73.5 69.0 Horses and colts .............................. 3,381 5,O,l6 Cattle ........................................ 9,823 lo,,611 Hogs and pigs ................................. 9,522 12,841 Corn for ,a11 purposes, acres .................... 18,616 18,315 Corn for grain, acres ......................... 17,640’ 17,480 bushels ....................... 543,785 60’7,238 Wheat threshed, acres ........................ 20,128 25,542 bushels ...................... 400’,112 464,416 Oats threshed, acres .......................... 11,031 U&133 bushels ........................ 262,398 271,853 Oats cut ,and fed unthreshed, .acres ............. 419 439 Barley threshed, acres ........................ 2,530 1,276 bushels ...................... 77,531 23,869 Rye threshed, ,acres ........................... 974 2,706 bushels ......................... 13,741 42,635 Mixed grains threshed, ,acres .................. 190 189 bushels ............... 4,673 5@9 Irish potatoes, acres .......................... 12,626 13,560, bushels ........................ 1,483,067 1,681,211 All hay, and sorgums for forage, acres ....... 25,654 24,729 tons ........ 26,0~0’6 331650 MINERALOGY By BENJAI~IN L. MILLER Lehigh County has yielded a fairly large variety of minerals, some- what less than some of the counties of the southeastern portion of the State, but far more than the northern, central and western counties. The variety is due largely to the different types of rock present in the county.
    [Show full text]