Guidebook for the 32Nd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guidebook for the 32Nd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania GUIDEBOOK - 32nJ f itfJ Conft>itnct Of Ptnn~~f v4ni4 Gtof o~t~t~ East Stroudsburg, Pa . September 29 and 30, 1967 ... - -..: ... 'kmied, $/atu {}~ SWUte4f - p~ q~,gWUJelf r .J:.::~: ...;,;.· .. Guidebook for·the 32nd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists ' -~ GEOLOGY IN TIIE REGION OF TIIE DELAWARE TO LEHIGH WATER GAPS September 29 and 30, 1967 ! ' I Hosts: U. S. Geological Survey and Pennsylvania Geological Survey Tl ' J -~ _: By Jack B. Epstein and Anita G. Epstein U. S. Geological Survey, Beltsville, Md., and Washington, D. C. i .::..1I t --, . iI -J Cover Design: Jack B. Epstein Guidebook distributed by: Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey Depa rtrrent of En vi ronrrenta 1 Resources Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 --··' i Publication authorized by the Director, U. S. Geological Survey -CONTENTS I l- Introduction ..................................................... Early hist.ory •.•.••.• , • , ••••• , •• , ••••• , , , • , •••• , , • , • , •••• , • • • • • • • 4 Stratigraphy •.•. , ••••• , .•••••••••••• , • , ••••.••••• , , ••••• , • • • • • • • • • 13 Geographic and tectonic environments of deposition ••••••••••• 13 Structural geology .•.•.•••••••••••• , •••••••• , ••••••• , , • . • • • • • • • • • • 19 L,___ ; 25 ''nle Taconic orogeny in eastern Pennsylvania ...................... r , ....., ! 32 Geomorphology .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Glac ia 1 geology •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.• • • • • 34 .. -.'' 37 i.Ui...1 Road log--First day .............................................. 38 Stop 1 ....................................................... 46 Stop 2 ........................................................ 50 Stop 3 ....................................................... Stop 4 . , • ,· ..•.•..••••• , •. ,,.,,, •.•• ,,., ••••••• , ••• , •• ,, •• , •. , 53 57 Stop 5 ...................... " . .. ...................... 62 Stop 6 .................................... -· ................. 66 Road log--Second day ............................................. 66 Stop l ........................................................ ' , 69 Stop 2 ........................................................ 76 ' ___ _J" Stop 3 ......•.•..........•........•....•••.• ........ ....... 76 Stop 4 ...................................... ............. 79 Stop 5 ························································· 81 Stop.6 ....................................................... 85 References cited ................................................. 90 ............. ' ............................ l: .• .I Reprint (Epstein, 1966) iii I I J ILLUSTRATIONS ... Page Figure 1. Index map of eastern Pennsylva~ia ................... 3 2. Generalized geologic map of field-trip area . .. 5 . _J 3. Phys iograp hie diagram of field-trip area ............ 6 4. Stratigraphic section of Shawangunk Conglomerate, Bloomsburg Red Beds, and Poxono Island Formation rt of White (1882) in field-trip area • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • 15 fJ 5. Stratigraphic section of Poxono Island Formation J of White (1882) through Buttermilk Falls Limestone of Willard (1938) in field-trip area ........................................ •..... 17 6. Geologic structure section in eastern part of field-trip area •.••••.•.••• ,· ..•..•••••••..•••.• '.i• 23 7. Geologic structure section in western part of field-trip area •..•.••.••.•••••.••.••••••••••.••. 24 J 8. Stereographic projections of cleavage .••••.•••••••• 30 9. Geologic section through Blue Mountain east of Little Gap .................................. " .... 33 10. Diagrammatic sketch of Wisconsin glacier in Lake Sciota •••.•••.••••.•.•.•••••••••••••.•.•••.•• 36 11. Topographic map and geologic section of esker and delta, stop 1, first day ...................... 39 12. -Diagrammatic geologic section through Stony Ridge at Little Gap .............................. 43 13.. Diagrammatic geologic section of Penn Big Bed Slate Company quarry, stop 2, first day •••••••.••• 46 iv 1,, U'.·· ··. I I -..:.-· Page i -~ 49 ' Figure 1/~. Geologic section east of Lehigh Gap •••••••·····~·· r .-·~ j ' 15. Diagrammatic geologic section through the -L• Shawangunk-Martinsburg contact at Lehigh Gap, stop 3, first day • • • • • . • . • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . 49 16. Diagrammatic sketch of hedding and cleavages -L_J in Shawangunk Cong1d111erate, stop 3, first day 51 ' r I 17. Diagrammatic sketch of normal fault in Shawangunk I _,1_: Conglomerate, stop 3, first day ................ .. 51 :; ·, -~ ! _G,.,;1 18. Diagrammatic sketch of wedges and bedding-plane ·dips in Bloomsburg Red Beds, stop 4, first day 54 n.. , ~ 19. Geologic section through Blue Mountain near Pennsylvania Turnpike Extension .•.•.•••.•••••.••• 54 20. Columnar section at stop 5, fir.st day ............. 58 21. Geologic map and section at stop 5, first day 59 22. Diagranm1atic sketch of cascade folds, stop 5, fi.rs t day . • . • . • . • • • . 60 j 23. Sketch of view north of Cherry Ridge . .. .. .. .. .. .. 61 I \ .;, .. -1 2li·.. Stratigraphic column at stop 6, first day .. .. • . • .. 63 25. Geologic section at stop 6, first day 64 -~ 26. Diagrmmnatic sketch of overturned anticline at stop 6, first day .....••.............•.•.•.••.••• 64 27. Sketcl1 of biohermul <rnd nonbiohermal facies in Coeymans Formation, stop 2, second day • • • . • • . • 70 28. Geologic section at Tocks Island damsite ••.••.. , • • 71 29. Ceo logic section through Godfrey Ridge, stop 4, second day ....................................... 77 v Page Figure 30. Diagrammatic geologic section showing fanning of cleavage in Port Ewen Shale, stop 4, second day- •.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••• 78 J 31. Geologic map of.Delaware Water Gap area, stop 6, }1 second day •••••••••.••.•.••••.•••..• _, • • . • . • • • . • . • 82 ·U P_··.Ll TABLES n.·. Page .y Table 1. Description of rock units in Kittatinny Mountain r].._·· and Godfrey Ridge ................................ 10 •\:- 2. Description of rock units in Blue Mountain and 1 Cherry, Chestnut, and Stony Ridges • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 12 - 3. Li thotec tonic uni ts • • . • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • 20 J j I.: ts"] f i ..J. vi J u 1 INTRODUCTION ;,,; This field conference will demonstrate the interrelationship of r-·: -U the stratigraphy, structure, geomorphology, glacial geology, and eco~omic geology of Middle Ordovician through part of the Middle Devonian strata ,r7' i. 1 _)\ and overlying surficial deposits in the area between the Delaware and Lehigh Rivers in eastern Pennsylvania. Rocks north and south of this area were seen on two previous fi~ld trips,. The 26th Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, in 1961, dealt with the rocks.in the Great Valley and Reading Prong to the south. The 28th Field Conference concerned the geology north and west of Stroudsburg, Pa., and included rocks generally younger than Lower Devonian. r11:_':1 .l;;:Y Data for this field trip have been gathered by (1) nearly completed bedrock and surficial mapping of all or parts of eight 7lii-minute quadrangles by J. B. Epstein, U. S. Geological Survey (Stroudsburg, East Stroudsburg, Portland, Saylorsburg, Wind Gap, Kunkletown, Palmerton, and Lehighton-- the last five being done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Geological. Survey), and (2) stratigraphic studies of Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian rocks of northeastern Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and southeastern- I I --,;.-J most New York by Epstein and others (1967). In addition, we have benefited from discussions and exchange of data with several coworkers, including A. A. Drake, Jr., U. s. Geological Survey, and J. D. Glaeser, J. F. Wietrzychowski, and W. D. Seven of the Pennsylvania Geological Survey. D. G. Parrillo and A. J. Depman of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers have supplied the ?ata concerning the engineering geology of the Tocks Island damsite which will be discussed at stop 2, second day. They have also made available cores from the damsfte which will be seen at the lunch stop on the second day. D. W. Kohls supplied the road-log description of The ! I •1....i \ 2 .j New Jersey Zinc Company operations at Palmerton. Much of the work is still incomplete, and some of the conclusions presented in this guidebook should be regarded as tentative. We will examine the probable facies relationships and correlations __.' between rocks in the eastern and western sections of the area and consider the environmental conditions under which these strata were deposited. The rock stratigraphic units have been grouped into four successive lithofacies, r "·1··i".. .; each of which displays a different style of d~formation. Folds produced in these rocks are disharmonic, and it is believed that each rock sequence is set off from sequences above and below by a decollement, or zone of r1 detachment. Movement was northwest into the Appalachian basin, primarily l..1 by gravitational sliding, aided by direct~d tectonic forces. The contact u between the Shawangunk Conglomerate of Silurian age and Martinsburg " Formation of Ordovician age, believed by most workers to be an angular unconformity, may also be one zone of detachment. The deformational effects of the Middle to Late Ordovician Taconic orogeny may not be as J intense in this area as some geologists believe. rt Y. Erosion of the folded heterogeneous bedrock in this part of the Appalachians has produced linear ridges and valleys. This topography had a profound effect on the manner of retreat of the Pleistocene glaciers. ... ·.··]'.· We shall demonstrate that during the Wisconsin Glaciation a moraine-dammed
Recommended publications
  • Water Resources of Oley Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania Were Studied by the U.S
    WATER RESOURCES OF OLEY TOWNSHIP, BERKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA By Gary N. Paulachok and Charles R. Wood U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 87-4065 Prepared in cooperation with the OLEY TOWNSHIP SUPERVISORS Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section 4th Floor, Federal Building Federal Center P.O. Box 1107 Box 25425 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1107 Denver, Colorado 80225 ii CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................ 1 Introduction............................................................ 2 Purpose and scope................................................... 2 Description of area................................................. 2 Physical and cultural setting.................................. 2 Climate and precipitation...................................... 4 Geologic setting............................................... 5 Water supply and wastewater treatment............................... 6 We11-numbering system............................................... 7 Geologic names and aquifer codes.................................... 7 Acknowledgments..................................................... 8 Surface-water resources................................................. 8 Drainage basins and streamflow.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The County of Warren and the Appalachian Trail Conservancy Will Be Hosting a Public Outreach Meeting on Wednesday March 23Rd from 10:00 A.M
    The County of Warren and the Appalachian Trail Conservancy will be hosting a public outreach meeting on Wednesday March 23rd from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Warren County Library Headquarters located at 2 Shotwell Drive in Belvidere, NJ, 07823. Please join us to learn how Warren County can become an official Appalachian Trail Community, the benefits of this official designation, and how you can be involved. Spanning 2,190 miles across 14 states, the Appalachian Trail draws 3 million visitors each year. While only about 13 miles of this exceptional trail pass through Warren County, our section along the scenic Kittatinny Ridge boasts: . Natural attractions like the Delaware River, Mount Tammany, Dunnfield Creek, Sunfish Pond, Catfish Pond, Mt. Mohican, and more; . Passage through New Jersey’s Worthington State Forest and the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, which draws up to 5 million visitors per year; . Nearby sites of interest like Turtle Beach, Old Mine Road, Millbrook Village; and the Mohican Outdoor Center. This program will not only help promote Warren County as a natural gateway to the popular Appalachian Trail and the entire Delaware River region, but it will help connect visitors to our inviting communities, our charming downtowns and villages, our farmers and farm markets, as well as all of our other local businesses. This is a wonderful opportunity to connect with the celebrated Appalachian Trail, but we need help from community members like you. We hope you will join us! Harpers Ferry, West Virginia Appalachian Trail Community™ A Designation Program of the Appalachian Trail Conservancy The Appalachian Trail Conservancy (ATC) mission is to preserve and manage the Appalachian Trail – ensuring that its vast natural beauty and priceless cultural heritage can be shared and enjoyed today, tomorrow, and for centuries to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulphate Balance of Lakes and Shallow Groundwater in the Vasavere Buried Valley, Northeast Estonia
    SULPHATE BALANCE OF LAKES AND SHALLOW GROUNDWATER IN THE VASAVERE BURIED VALLEY, NORTHEAST ESTONIA K. ERG Department of Mining Tallinn Technical University 82 Kopli St., 10412 Tallinn Estonia Phone: 620 38 53 Fax: 620 36 96 E-mail:[email protected] Groundwater constitutes an important component of many water resource systems, supplying water for domestic use, for industry, and for agriculture. Management of a groundwater system, an aquifer, means making such decisions as to the total quantity of water to be withdrawn annually, the location of wells for pumping and for artificial recharge and their rates, and control conditions at aquifer boundaries. Not less important are decisions related to groundwater quality. In fact, the quantity and quality problems cannot be separated. In many parts of country, with the increased withdrawal of groundwater, the quality of groundwater has been continuously deteriorating. In recent years the attention has been focused on groundwater contamination by mine water. A most important part of modelling procedure is a thorough understanding of the system, and the processes that take place in it. It is important to identify those parts of the system’s behaviour that are relevant to the considered problem, while other parts may be neglected. On the basis of this understanding, summarised as a conceptual model of the given problem, a numerical model is constructed. A groundwater flow model of the Quaternary aquifer, in eastern part of oil shale deposit area, in Vasavere buried valley, was constructed by using the conceptual model. The infiltration of contaminants grows and the Quaternary aquifer is polluted by sulphate in a large area of Vasavere buried valley.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Breccia Gashes of the Durham Coast. Lebour.G.A
    Durham E-Theses Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast Westgate, W. A. How to cite: Westgate, W. A. (1957) Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8519/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. SOME ASPECTS OF THE G-EOMQRPHOLO GY OP THE DUHHAM COAST W.A. Westgate, B.Sc. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Durham. February, 1957. Itmm?, not ** > \ i3i (i) This research was carried out whilst I was in receipt of a Nature Conservancy Research Studentship "between July 1953 and July 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Valleys of the New England Coast As Related to Fluctuations of Sea Level
    Bedrock Valleys of the New England Coast as Related to Fluctuations of Sea Level By JOSEPH E. UPSON and CHARLES W. SPENCER SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 454-M Depths to bedrock in coastal valleys of New England, and nature of sedimentary Jill resulting from sea-level fluctuations in Pleistocene and Recent time UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication, as follows: Upson, Joseph Edwin, 1910- Bedrock valleys of the New England coast as related to fluctuations of sea level, by Joseph E. Upson and Charles W. Spencer. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964. iv, 42 p. illus., maps, diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 454-M) Shorter contributions to general geology. Bibliography: p. 39-41. (Continued on next card) Upson, Joseph Edwin, 1910- Bedrock valleys of the New England coast as related to fluctuations of sea level. 1964. (Card 2) l.Geology, Stratigraphic Pleistocene. 2.Geology, Stratigraphic Recent. S.Geology New England. I.Spencer, Charles Winthrop, 1930-joint author. ILTitle. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Configuration and depth of bedrock valleys, etc. Con. Page Abstract.__________________________________________ Ml Buried valleys of the Boston area. _ _______________
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Water Gap U.S
    National Park Service Delaware Water Gap U.S. Department of the Interior National Recreation Area Summer/Fall 2015 Guide to the Gap N A YEARS A T E I 50 1965-2015 R O A N N AL IO RECREAT Your National Park Celebrates 50 Years! The Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area was established by a park for the people. Today, visitors roam a landscape carved by uplift, Congress on September 1, 1965, to preserve the natural, culture, and scenic erosion, and glacial activity that is marked by hemlock and rhododendron- resources of the Delaware River Valley and provide opportunities for laced ravines, rumbling waterfalls, fertile floodplains and is rich with recreation, education, and enjoyment to the most densely populated region archaeological evidence and historic narratives. This haven for natural of the nation. Sprung out of the Tocks Island Dam controversy, the last and cultural stories is your place, your park, and we invite you to celebrate 50 years has solidified Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area as with us in 2015. The River, the Valley, and You . 2 Events. 4 Delaware River . 6 Park Trails . 8. Fees and Passes . 2 Park Map and Visitor Centers . 3 Are you curious about the natural and cultural Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area From ridgetop to riverside, vistas to ravines, Activities and Events in 2015 . 4 history of the area? Would you like to see includes nearly 40 miles of the free-flowing from easy to extreme, more than 100 Delaware River Water Trail . 6 artisans at work? Want to experience what it Middle Delaware River Scenic and Recreational miles of trail offer something for every mood.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithostratigraphic Characterization of a Buried Bedrock Valley Using Airborne and Surface Geophysics
    Lithostratigraphic Characterization of a Buried Bedrock Valley Using Airborne and Surface Geophysics by Oliver Conway-White A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Engineering Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Oliver R. Conway-White, May, 2020 ABSTRACT LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A BURIED BEDROCK VALLEY USING AIRBORNE AND SURFACE GEOPHYSICS Oliver Conway-White Advisor: University of Guelph, 2020 Dr. Beth Parker A helicopter-borne frequency-domain electromagnetic instrument was used to investigate the lithostratigraphic architecture of a buried bedrock valley near Elora, Ontario. The resulting airborne electrical resistivity model was evaluated against co-located high-resolution ground- based electrical resistivity, seismic refraction, and gravity surveys across two sections of the valley. Results were interpreted using published geological datasets including continuous core, geophysical logs, and an existing regional Quaternary geologic model. A comparison between the local geophysically-based model and the regional Quaternary model shows that an airborne electromagnetic survey can markedly improve characterization of bedrock valley morphology and Quaternary architecture. These results provide confidence in regional-scale interpretations of airborne electromagnetic data for the purpose of delineating lithostratigraphic boundaries. Such data would provide valuable insight into the placement of boreholes for additional and complementary characterization at the borehole scale, leading to delineation of hydrostratigraphic boundaries. In combination, these data will inform 3-D groundwater flow models. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank Dr. Colby Steelman who was the lead on assisting me with this thesis. While paperwork may have prevented him from being officially on my committee, we all know he went above and beyond as my ‘scientific’ advisor.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Multiple Glacial Advances and Ice Loading from a Buried Valley in Southern Manhattan INTRODUCTION DRILLING PROCEDUR
    Evidence for Multiple Glacial Advances and Ice Loading From a Buried Valley in Southern Manhattan Cheryl J. Moss, Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers, 14 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10122 ([email protected]) Charles Merguerian, Geology Department, 114 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549 ([email protected]; [email protected]) INTRODUCTION Our field and subsurface studies of glacial strata from construction sites and borings indicate that the glacial history of the New York City area is complex. The Ronkonkoma and Harbor Hill terminal moraines are evidence that the area has experienced more than one glacial advance. There is more to the story, however, than simply ice advance, retreat, repeat. Many locations in New York City display seemingly simple stratigraphy, such as thick layers of till over bedrock or 100’ of outwash sands. Most sites aren’t as obviously complex as one offering multiple tills intercalated with outwash and varved strata. When characteristics other than soil type are taken into consideration, however, stratigraphic differences sometimes appear. A change in color or mineralogy, for instance, might indicate ice coming from another direction. A change in engineering properties can also contribute to the art of unraveling glacial history. A site in lower Manhattan near the Brooklyn Bridge occupies a bedrock valley filled with a variety of interlayered glacial drift. These varied strata mandate that multiple waves of ice have passed over the area. Changes in the compactness of the soil with depth, as measured by the Standard Penetration Test, provide additional evidence of ice loading. This paper will demonstrate that patterns in strata and SPT values can be used to determine which layers at a site have been ice loaded.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Water Gap
    Delaware Water Gap NATIONAL RECREATION AREA PENNSYLVANIA . NEW JERSEY WHERE TO STAY Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, completed facilities are not yet in operation at terrace at the foot of Mount Minsi near the lower authorized by Congress in 1965, will preserve a a particular site, plan to return when you can end of the parking area, there is an unobstructed Food, lodging, gasoline, souvenirs, and other large and relatively unspoiled area astride the visit in safety and comfort. view across the river. Exhibits at the terrace ex­ items are available in towns and communities river boundary of Pennsylvania and New Jersey. plain how this mountain range was formed and from Port Jervis, N. Y., at the upper end of the Within easy driving range of several large metro- help you to understand rock formations visible national recreation area, to Portland, Pa., a few KITTATINNY POINT is on the New Jersey side politan areas, it will provide facilities and in the side of Mount Tammany. These million-year- miles below the proposed dam. No camping or of the Water Gap between Int. 80 and the Dela­ services for many types of recreational activities old rocks are constantly being changed by the picnicking facilities are available in the area ware River. A parking overlook is at the foot of and for interpretation of the area's scenic, forces of erosion. Alternate freezing and thawing this season, but they are available in nearby Mount Tammany on the opposite side of the scientific, and historical values. The forest cover of water in the crevices and plants forcing their State and private developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Analysis and Evolution of Buried Tunnel Valleys in Northeast Alberta, Canada
    Quaternary Science Reviews 65 (2013) 53e72 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Morphological analysis and evolution of buried tunnel valleys in northeast Alberta, Canada N. Atkinson*, L.D. Andriashek, S.R. Slattery Alberta Geological Survey, Energy Resources Conservation Board, Twin Atria Building, 4th Floor, 4999-98 Ave. Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3, Canada article info abstract Article history: Tunnel valleys are large elongated depressions eroded into unconsolidated sediments and bedrock. Received 9 August 2012 Tunnel valleys are believed to have been efficient drainage pathways for large volumes of subglacial Received in revised form meltwater, and reflect the interplay between groundwater flow and variations in the hydraulic con- 26 November 2012 ductivity of the substrate, and basal meltwater production and associated water pressure variations at Accepted 28 November 2012 the ice-bed interface. Tunnel valleys are therefore an important component of the subglacial hydrological Available online 12 February 2013 system. Three-dimensional modelling of geophysical and lithological data has revealed numerous buried Keywords: Tunnel valleys valleys eroded into the bedrock unconformity in northeast Alberta, many of which are interpreted to be Subglacial drainage tunnel valleys. Due to the very high data density used in this modelling, the morphology, orientation and Sedimentary architecture internal architecture of several of these tunnel valleys have been determined. The northeast Alberta buried tunnel valleys are similar to the open tunnel valleys described along the former margins of the southern Laurentide Ice Sheet. They have high depth to width ratios, with un- dulating, low gradient longitudinal profiles. Many valleys start and end abruptly, and occur as solitary, straight to slightly sinuous incisions, or form widespread anastomosing networks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Warren County Transportation Plan
    Technical Memorandum 2: Needs Assessment Warren County Transportation Plan Tech Memo 2.1 Previous Studies Tech Memo 2.2 Equity Assessment Tech Memo 2.3 WikiMap Tech Memo 2.4 Data Assessment JANUARY 2021 Technical Memorandum 2.1: Previous Studies Warren County Transportation Plan SEPTEMBER 2020 Technical Memorandum 2.1 Previous Studies Contents Warren County Transportation Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 Liberty Township Master Plan ................................................................................................................. 3 Warren County Strategic Growth Plan-Transportation Technical Study .................................................... 3 Knowlton Township Master Plan Reexamination Report .......................................................................... 3 Washington Borough Downtown Redevelopment Plan ............................................................................ 4 Phillipsburg Walkable Community Workshop Report ............................................................................... 4 Morris/Warren County Rail Corridor Study .............................................................................................. 4 Phillipsburg Master Plan Reexamination Report ...................................................................................... 4 New Jersey Statewide Freight Plan .......................................................................................................... 5 Plan 2045:
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey
    Evaluation of Groundwater Resources of Greenwich Township, Warren County, New Jersey M2 Associates Inc. 56 Country Acres Drive Hampton, New Jersey 08827 (908) 238-0827 EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY,NEW JERSEY NOVEMBER 8, 2005 Prepared for: Greenwich Township Planning Board 321 Greenwich Street Stewartsville, New Jersey 08886 Prepared by: Matthew J. Mulhall, P.G. M2 Associates Inc. 56 Country Acres Drive Hampton, New Jersey 08827 (908) 238-0827 EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF GREENWICH TOWNSHIP, WARREN COUNTY,NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 5 LOCATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 POPULATION DENSITY.................................................................................................... 6 PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE ............................................................................................ 6 TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ 6 SURFACE WATER .......................................................................................................... 7 Watersheds............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]