DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resources Report for the Great Miami River Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resources Report for the Great Miami River Watershed 2011-29 2011 WATER RESOURCES REPORT FOR THE GREAT MIAMI RIVER WATERSHED Summary This report summarizes the overall state of water resources in the Great Miami River Watershed for 2011, with an emphasis on the buried valley aquifer and water quantity and quality data. The Miami Conservancy District (MCD) operates and maintains an extensive hydrologic monitoring system. By tracking trends in precipitation, runoff, and groundwater levels, changes to the balance of the hydrologic system of the watershed are assessed. Water quality data also is collected in both surface and groundwater to track annual trends, establish a baseline for future studies, and verify nutrient reductions from landowner incentive programs. WATER QUANTITY The year 2011 was a record setting year with regards to annual precipitation. In 2011 MCD recorded record high annual precipitation within the Great Miami River Watershed. The 2011 mean annual precipitation was 58.89 inches, 19.84 inches above the long-term mean annual precipitation. The above normal precipitation contributed to above normal runoff in the Great Miami River and its tributary streams. The total annual runoff for the Great Miami River Watershed upstream of Hamilton was 29.83 inches, 16.61 inches above the long-term mean annual runoff. The year 2011 was an above normal year for groundwater storage in the Great Miami River buried valley aquifer system. The annual groundwater recharge to aquifers is estimated from stream gaging records for the Great Miami River Watershed. Groundwater recharge in 2011 was estimated to be 15.54 inches, 7.46 inches above the long-term mean annual groundwater recharge. The groundwater elevation levels measured in MCD observation wells reflect that the aquifers in the Great Miami River Watershed received most of their recharge in three major pulses occurring in late February/early March; late April/early May; and late November/early December. Groundwater levels in the major aquifers began the year at near normal levels, climbed to above normal levels, and finished the year at above normal levels. The water budget computed by MCD for the Great Miami River Watershed is a simple analysis using water inflows and outflows to the watershed. The computed 2011 water budget shows net water storage in the aquifers and soils of the watershed. Over the long term, the net water storage in the Great Miami River Watershed is near zero and water inflows and outflows are in balance. WATER QUALITY MCD collects data on nutrients in surface water to track annual trends, establish a baseline for future studies, and verify nutrient reductions from landowner incentive programs. In 2011, surface water quality continued to be impacted by excessive nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Nutrients are the primary pollutant issue in rivers and streams in Ohio (Ohio EPA, 2011). Excessive nutrients can lead to eutrophic conditions locally and contribute to the hypoxia problem in the Gulf of Mexico. Nutrients in the Great Miami River Watershed originate from both point and nonpoint sources. MCD collects data on emerging contaminant compounds which likely originated from private and municipal wastewater treatment systems. During 2011, data was collected on 21 emerging contaminant compounds in rivers, headwater streams, and the buried valley aquifer. Seventeen of the compounds were detected in one or more of the water samples. Analysis of surface water also reflects that the Great Miami River Watershed is impacted by fecal contaminants under all flow conditions and particularly during high flow events. Fecal indicator bacteria concentrations tend to be lowest during the summer and fall seasons when low flow conditions prevail. During 2011 groundwater samples were also collected to analyze the presence or absence of pollutants in the buried valley aquifer. The results show that water in the aquifer continues to be of high quality. Groundwater quality consistently meets nearly all the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) standards for drinking water. However, arsenic was detected in three samples at concentrations above the drinking water maximum contaminant levels. Arsenic is thought to be naturally occurring and probably not indicative of a human source. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Great Miami River Watershed .................................................................................................... 1 Buried Valley Aquifer................................................................................................................. 1 MCD’s Water Resource Monitoring Program ............................................................................ 1 Hydrogeologic Setting ................................................................................................................ 4 WATER QUANTITY .............................................................................................................................. 7 A. The Water Cycle .................................................................................................................... 7 B. Precipitation Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 7 2011 DATA ............................................................................................................................................. 9 2011 Precipitation in the Great Miami River Watershed ........................................................ 9 C. Monitoring Runoff, Streamflow, and Groundwater Recharge ............................................. 11 2011 Runoff in the Great Miami River Watershed ............................................................... 13 How Runoff is Computed ..................................................................................................... 13 Surface Runoff ...................................................................................................................... 13 Base Flow.............................................................................................................................. 14 Trends in Annual Runoff ...................................................................................................... 14 2011 Flow in the Great Miami River at Hamilton ................................................................ 15 2011 Groundwater Recharge in the Great Miami River Watershed ..................................... 17 How Groundwater Recharge is Estimated ............................................................................ 17 D. Monitoring Aquifer Storage ................................................................................................. 19 2011 Groundwater Levels ..................................................................................................... 19 2011 Groundwater Storage ................................................................................................... 21 2011 Estimated Water Budget for the Great Miami River Watershed ................................. 22 2011 Water Quantity Summary ............................................................................................ 25 WATER QUALITY ............................................................................................................................... 27 A. Nutrients ............................................................................................................................... 27 Nutrient Criteria .................................................................................................................... 27 Nitrogen ................................................................................................................................ 28 Phosphorus ............................................................................................................................ 28 Annual Nutrient Loads .......................................................................................................... 28 Annual Nutrient Yields ......................................................................................................... 30 B. Emerging Contaminants ....................................................................................................... 32 C. Microbial Source Tracking of Fecal Contaminants ............................................................. 34 D. Groundwater Quality Assessment ........................................................................................ 36 E. Exceedances of National Drinking Water Standards ........................................................... 38 F. Major Ions ............................................................................................................................. 38 G. Nutrients ............................................................................................................................... 39 H. Trace Metals ......................................................................................................................... 39 I. Semi-volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) ....................................................................... 39 J. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) .................................................................................. 39 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................... 40 REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Miami Slaughterhouse
    The Miami Slaughterhouse In the 1780’s, a Squirrel could reach Cincinnati from Pittsburg and never touch the ground. In part because of this heavy tree canopy, the land between the Little Miami River and the Great Miami River was known to have some of the richest farm land ever seen. The land between the Miami’s was a special hunting ground for the Indians. They would not give it up without a fight. In 1966, while researching a high school term paper, I found a diary written by Mary Covalt called “Reminiscences of Early Days about the construction and defense of Covalt Station primarily set during the years 1789 until 1795. “ My story tonight is about ordinary men and women coming down the Ohio River to settle in the land between the Little Miami and Great Miami Rivers. The Covalts who came down the Ohio and built Covalt Station in the area now known as Terrace Park were my ancestors. Mary Covalt’s diary along with other letters and personal accounts gives us the chance to use a zoom lens to focus on how life was lived was during this period. This story takes place in the Old Northwest Territory, and more specifically in the Ohio Territory and very specifically in the land between the two Miami Rivers. Not many of us would want to personally experience the sacrifices made to develop this land. Innocently, these pioneers came to a place that would embroil them in a life and death struggle for the next five years. These five years in the Old Northwest Territory would settle once and for all if America’s future growth would be west of the Allegany Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulphate Balance of Lakes and Shallow Groundwater in the Vasavere Buried Valley, Northeast Estonia
    SULPHATE BALANCE OF LAKES AND SHALLOW GROUNDWATER IN THE VASAVERE BURIED VALLEY, NORTHEAST ESTONIA K. ERG Department of Mining Tallinn Technical University 82 Kopli St., 10412 Tallinn Estonia Phone: 620 38 53 Fax: 620 36 96 E-mail:[email protected] Groundwater constitutes an important component of many water resource systems, supplying water for domestic use, for industry, and for agriculture. Management of a groundwater system, an aquifer, means making such decisions as to the total quantity of water to be withdrawn annually, the location of wells for pumping and for artificial recharge and their rates, and control conditions at aquifer boundaries. Not less important are decisions related to groundwater quality. In fact, the quantity and quality problems cannot be separated. In many parts of country, with the increased withdrawal of groundwater, the quality of groundwater has been continuously deteriorating. In recent years the attention has been focused on groundwater contamination by mine water. A most important part of modelling procedure is a thorough understanding of the system, and the processes that take place in it. It is important to identify those parts of the system’s behaviour that are relevant to the considered problem, while other parts may be neglected. On the basis of this understanding, summarised as a conceptual model of the given problem, a numerical model is constructed. A groundwater flow model of the Quaternary aquifer, in eastern part of oil shale deposit area, in Vasavere buried valley, was constructed by using the conceptual model. The infiltration of contaminants grows and the Quaternary aquifer is polluted by sulphate in a large area of Vasavere buried valley.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Breccia Gashes of the Durham Coast. Lebour.G.A
    Durham E-Theses Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast Westgate, W. A. How to cite: Westgate, W. A. (1957) Some aspects of the geomorphology of the Durham coast, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8519/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. SOME ASPECTS OF THE G-EOMQRPHOLO GY OP THE DUHHAM COAST W.A. Westgate, B.Sc. Submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Durham. February, 1957. Itmm?, not ** > \ i3i (i) This research was carried out whilst I was in receipt of a Nature Conservancy Research Studentship "between July 1953 and July 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Valleys of the New England Coast As Related to Fluctuations of Sea Level
    Bedrock Valleys of the New England Coast as Related to Fluctuations of Sea Level By JOSEPH E. UPSON and CHARLES W. SPENCER SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 454-M Depths to bedrock in coastal valleys of New England, and nature of sedimentary Jill resulting from sea-level fluctuations in Pleistocene and Recent time UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication, as follows: Upson, Joseph Edwin, 1910- Bedrock valleys of the New England coast as related to fluctuations of sea level, by Joseph E. Upson and Charles W. Spencer. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964. iv, 42 p. illus., maps, diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 454-M) Shorter contributions to general geology. Bibliography: p. 39-41. (Continued on next card) Upson, Joseph Edwin, 1910- Bedrock valleys of the New England coast as related to fluctuations of sea level. 1964. (Card 2) l.Geology, Stratigraphic Pleistocene. 2.Geology, Stratigraphic Recent. S.Geology New England. I.Spencer, Charles Winthrop, 1930-joint author. ILTitle. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Configuration and depth of bedrock valleys, etc. Con. Page Abstract.__________________________________________ Ml Buried valleys of the Boston area. _ _______________
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A. Darke County
    MIAMI VALLEY REGION AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Appendix A. Darke County A.1 DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Darke County is located in the northwest portion of the Miami Valley Region as shown in Figure A-1 and encompasses approximately 600 square miles, or 26% of the planning area. Figure A-1. Darke County Location Map Land use within Darke County is predominately rural, with over 80% of the land used for agricultural production. Darke County has the second highest concentration of animal feeding operations (AFOs) in Ohio. The County is characterized by small villages and wide open spaces. There are also several natural open spaces along stream corridors designated for recreational use and wildlife preservation. A.1.1 Communities in Darke County Although Darke County includes several communities, it is not heavily populated. The most recent 20-year projections indicate that the population in Darke is expected to remain constant. Although the population projections indicate overall growth in Darke County over the next 20 years, the population within the Stillwater River watershed in the county is not anticipated to change significantly. The administrative boundaries within this area are listed in Table A-1. Table A-1. Administrative Boundaries within Darke County Townships Incorporated Communities Adams Neave Liberty Ansonia Greenville Versailles Allen Patterson Mississinawa Arcanum North Star Wayne Lakes Brown Richland Wayne Bradford (portion) Osgood Yorkshire Franklin Van Buren York Burkettsville/New Weston Rossburg Greenville Wabash Washington Gettysburg Union City Jackson 74 MIAMI VALLEY REGION AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Watershed groups that are active in Darke County are listed in Table A-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithostratigraphic Characterization of a Buried Bedrock Valley Using Airborne and Surface Geophysics
    Lithostratigraphic Characterization of a Buried Bedrock Valley Using Airborne and Surface Geophysics by Oliver Conway-White A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Engineering Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Oliver R. Conway-White, May, 2020 ABSTRACT LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A BURIED BEDROCK VALLEY USING AIRBORNE AND SURFACE GEOPHYSICS Oliver Conway-White Advisor: University of Guelph, 2020 Dr. Beth Parker A helicopter-borne frequency-domain electromagnetic instrument was used to investigate the lithostratigraphic architecture of a buried bedrock valley near Elora, Ontario. The resulting airborne electrical resistivity model was evaluated against co-located high-resolution ground- based electrical resistivity, seismic refraction, and gravity surveys across two sections of the valley. Results were interpreted using published geological datasets including continuous core, geophysical logs, and an existing regional Quaternary geologic model. A comparison between the local geophysically-based model and the regional Quaternary model shows that an airborne electromagnetic survey can markedly improve characterization of bedrock valley morphology and Quaternary architecture. These results provide confidence in regional-scale interpretations of airborne electromagnetic data for the purpose of delineating lithostratigraphic boundaries. Such data would provide valuable insight into the placement of boreholes for additional and complementary characterization at the borehole scale, leading to delineation of hydrostratigraphic boundaries. In combination, these data will inform 3-D groundwater flow models. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank Dr. Colby Steelman who was the lead on assisting me with this thesis. While paperwork may have prevented him from being officially on my committee, we all know he went above and beyond as my ‘scientific’ advisor.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Multiple Glacial Advances and Ice Loading from a Buried Valley in Southern Manhattan INTRODUCTION DRILLING PROCEDUR
    Evidence for Multiple Glacial Advances and Ice Loading From a Buried Valley in Southern Manhattan Cheryl J. Moss, Mueser Rutledge Consulting Engineers, 14 Penn Plaza, New York, NY 10122 ([email protected]) Charles Merguerian, Geology Department, 114 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549 ([email protected]; [email protected]) INTRODUCTION Our field and subsurface studies of glacial strata from construction sites and borings indicate that the glacial history of the New York City area is complex. The Ronkonkoma and Harbor Hill terminal moraines are evidence that the area has experienced more than one glacial advance. There is more to the story, however, than simply ice advance, retreat, repeat. Many locations in New York City display seemingly simple stratigraphy, such as thick layers of till over bedrock or 100’ of outwash sands. Most sites aren’t as obviously complex as one offering multiple tills intercalated with outwash and varved strata. When characteristics other than soil type are taken into consideration, however, stratigraphic differences sometimes appear. A change in color or mineralogy, for instance, might indicate ice coming from another direction. A change in engineering properties can also contribute to the art of unraveling glacial history. A site in lower Manhattan near the Brooklyn Bridge occupies a bedrock valley filled with a variety of interlayered glacial drift. These varied strata mandate that multiple waves of ice have passed over the area. Changes in the compactness of the soil with depth, as measured by the Standard Penetration Test, provide additional evidence of ice loading. This paper will demonstrate that patterns in strata and SPT values can be used to determine which layers at a site have been ice loaded.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans, Europeans, and the Raid on Pickawillany
    ABSTRACT “THE LAND BELONGS TO NEITHER ONE”: NATIVE AMERICANS, EUROPEANS, AND THE RAID ON PICKAWILLANY In 1752, the Miami settlement at Pickawillany was attacked by a force of Ottawa and Chippewa warriors under the command of a métis soldier from Canada. This raid, and the events that precipitated it, is ideally suited to act as a case study of the role of Native American peoples in the Ohio Country during the first half of the eighteenth century. Natives negotiated their roles and borders with their British and French neighbors, and chose alliances with the European power that offered the greatest advantage. Europeans were alternately leaders, partners, conquerors and traders with the Natives, and exercised varying levels and types of control over the Ohio Country. Throughout the period, each of the three groups engaged in a struggle to define their roles in regards to each other, and to define the borders between them. Pickawillany offers insights into this negotiation. It demonstrates how Natives were not passive victims, but active, vital agents who acted in their own interest. The events of the raid feature a number of individuals who were cultural brokers, intermediaries between the groups who played a central, but tenuous, role in negotiations. It also exhibits the power of ritual violence, a discourse of torture and maiming that communicated meanings to friends and rivals alike, and whose implications shaped the history of the period and perceptions of Natives. Luke Aaron Fleeman Martinez May 2011 “THE LAND BELONGS TO NEITHER ONE”:
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Analysis and Evolution of Buried Tunnel Valleys in Northeast Alberta, Canada
    Quaternary Science Reviews 65 (2013) 53e72 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Morphological analysis and evolution of buried tunnel valleys in northeast Alberta, Canada N. Atkinson*, L.D. Andriashek, S.R. Slattery Alberta Geological Survey, Energy Resources Conservation Board, Twin Atria Building, 4th Floor, 4999-98 Ave. Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3, Canada article info abstract Article history: Tunnel valleys are large elongated depressions eroded into unconsolidated sediments and bedrock. Received 9 August 2012 Tunnel valleys are believed to have been efficient drainage pathways for large volumes of subglacial Received in revised form meltwater, and reflect the interplay between groundwater flow and variations in the hydraulic con- 26 November 2012 ductivity of the substrate, and basal meltwater production and associated water pressure variations at Accepted 28 November 2012 the ice-bed interface. Tunnel valleys are therefore an important component of the subglacial hydrological Available online 12 February 2013 system. Three-dimensional modelling of geophysical and lithological data has revealed numerous buried Keywords: Tunnel valleys valleys eroded into the bedrock unconformity in northeast Alberta, many of which are interpreted to be Subglacial drainage tunnel valleys. Due to the very high data density used in this modelling, the morphology, orientation and Sedimentary architecture internal architecture of several of these tunnel valleys have been determined. The northeast Alberta buried tunnel valleys are similar to the open tunnel valleys described along the former margins of the southern Laurentide Ice Sheet. They have high depth to width ratios, with un- dulating, low gradient longitudinal profiles. Many valleys start and end abruptly, and occur as solitary, straight to slightly sinuous incisions, or form widespread anastomosing networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Benthic Macroinvertebrate In
    Monitoring water quality of urban stormwater runoff to receiving river systems in Dayton, Ohio: Wet-weather sampling, site selection, and assessment of MS4 drainage areas By Kevin W. Custer, Eric B. Borth and Ryan W. McEwan Department of Biology University of Dayton 300 College Park Dr. Dayton, Ohio 45469 ___________________________________________ For The City of Dayton Department of Water Division of Environmental Management Final Report 31-December-2016 City of Dayton MS4 monitoring - 2016 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 5 1.0 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................. 6 2.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS ........................................................................................... 7 2.1 WET-WEATHER SAMPLING DESIGN ......................................................................................... 7 2.2 WET-WEATHER SITES ............................................................................................................. 7 2.3 WATER SAMPLING .................................................................................................................. 8 2.4 PRECIPITATION ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 QA/QC .................................................................................................................................. 9 3.0
    [Show full text]
  • Taylorsville Metropark
    Old Springfield Road PARK FEATURES TAYLORSVILLE BUCKEYE & NORTH METROPARK Buckeye & North COUNTRY TRAILS Country Trails S The Buckeye and North Country Trails join the Great u l l i Miami River Bikeway at Old Springfield Road and v a n follow it south through the park. The Buckeye Trail R o completely encircles Ohio and is more than 1,400 a d miles long. The North Country Scenic Trail extends into seven states and will be the longest continuous hiking trail in the United States when completed. Both trails provide long-distance hiking and link historical and scenic features of the state and surrounding areas. MIAMI-ERIE CANAL Running parallel to the Great Miami River through Taylorsville was the Miami-Erie Canal. This hand dug “big ditch,” completed in 1845, took 20 years to construct. A great achievement for its day, it opened the state for commerce by connecting the Ohio River at Cincinnati to Lake Erie at Toledo with a navigable channel. Remnants of the canal can still be found on the north and south sides of the dam. Five hundred Trails are open year-round, but during periods of high feet north of the dam stands the foundation of an water, trails along river may be muddy or impassable. aqueduct. These impressive structures were large, Visit metroparks.org/alerts for park closure information. water-filled bridges over rivers that allowed canal boats to cross. Color-Coded Hiking Trails TRAIL TADMOR white trail = 0.3 miles Follow the Great Miami River Bikeway north of the K E Y green trail = 0.4 miles dam about 1.25 miles to the site of Tadmor.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Ohio Trail
    Along The Ohio Trail A Short History of Ohio Lands Dear Ohioan, Meet Simon, your trail guide through Ohio’s history! As the 17th state in the Union, Ohio has a unique history that I hope you will find interesting and worth exploring. As you read Along the Ohio Trail, you will learn about Ohio’s geography, what the first Ohioan’s were like, how Ohio was discovered, and other fun facts that made Ohio the place you call home. Enjoy the adventure in learning more about our great state! Sincerely, Keith Faber Ohio Auditor of State Along the Ohio Trail Table of Contents page Ohio Geography . .1 Prehistoric Ohio . .8 Native Americans, Explorers, and Traders . .17 Ohio Land Claims 1770-1785 . .27 The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 . .37 Settling the Ohio Lands 1787-1800 . .42 Ohio Statehood 1800-1812 . .61 Ohio and the Nation 1800-1900 . .73 Ohio’s Lands Today . .81 The Origin of Ohio’s County Names . .82 Bibliography . .85 Glossary . .86 Additional Reading . .88 Did you know that Ohio is Hi! I’m Simon and almost the same distance I’ll be your trail across as it is up and down guide as we learn (about 200 miles)? Our about the land we call Ohio. state is shaped in an unusual way. Some people think it looks like a flag waving in the wind. Others say it looks like a heart. The shape is mostly caused by the Ohio River on the east and south and Lake Erie in the north. It is the 35th largest state in the U.S.
    [Show full text]