DOCSLIB.ORG

The Penobscot Expedition: Commodore Saltonstall and Themassachuse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Penobscot Expedition: Commodore Saltonstall and Themassachuse Naval War College Review Volume 56 Article 18 Number 3 Summer 2003 The eP nobscot Expedition: Commodore Saltonstall and theMassachusetts Conspiracy of 1779 James B. Goodman Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Goodman, James B. (2003) "The eP nobscot Expedition: Commodore Saltonstall and theMassachusetts onC spiracy of 1779," Naval War College Review: Vol. 56 : No. 3 , Article 18. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol56/iss3/18 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEWS 171 Goodman: The Penobscot Expedition: Commodore Saltonstall and theMassachuse attack out to three hundred miles from inherited Stalin’s schemes and built up naval bases, and to limit Soviet Kuznetsov’s fleet, extensive deploy- land-based air support. In 1946, ments did not replace deeply held Kuznetsov’s close associate Admiral positional and defensive assumptions. Vladimir Alafuzov developed a posi- Had Stalin’s “oceanic” fleet actually tional scheme of supremacy under been built, whether a shift of orienta- land-based air cover up to one hun- tion by him or his admirals toward dred miles from naval bases, and con- “global naval power” would have oc- ditional sea control by large surface curred remains undemonstrated and vessels with limited air support in a problematic. “far zone” out to three hundred miles. WILLARD C. FRANK, JR. This fell short of command of the ex- Old Dominion University panses of the Barents, Baltic, and Black Seas or of most of the Sea of Japan. Only submarines with long endurance could operate in the open ocean, but Stalin preferred medium submarines, Buker, George E. The Penobscot Expedition: Com- conceived for operations in near seas modore Saltonstall and the Massachusetts Conspir- against an amphibious threat. The pro- acy of 1779. Annapolis, Md.: Naval Institute Press, jected battleships would have had an 2002. 195pp. $32.95 operational radius only half that of In the various history books on the their contemporaries in oceanic na- American Revolution, the Penobscot vies. Only current Italian battleships, expedition is rarely mentioned in any also designed for near seas, had such detail, being overshadowed by the more limited autonomy. To operate across widely known and successful battles the open ocean was a ludicrous con- and campaigns. Perhaps this is due to cept to Stalin in 1945, arguing for a the dismal outcome of this early joint defensive posture for at least ten to fif- amphibious operation and to the desire teen years to come. Stalin’s projected by some, especially Massachusetts poli- “large sea and oceanic navy,” to use ticians of the time, to forget what had the Soviet term, was likely created for happened. a hoped-for more robust traditional This hastily conceived expedition was strategic defensive in contiguous seas. launched from Boston in July 1779. The The evidence in this book, if not its expedition was given the task of ex- title, lends support to Herrick’s judg- pelling the mounting British military ment of a Stalinist strategy of limited presence on coastal Maine, centered command of the near seas. To suggest around Penobscot Bay, but specifically that it was “the first step on the road at Castine. The expedition set off with to global naval power,” as does series full expectation of success on the part editor Holger Herwig in the preface, of the Massachusetts political leader- would require Stalin and his navy to ship. But from the beginning, the force demonstrate a conceptual leap for assembled was hampered by inadequate which neither had shown a proclivity. leadership, divided command author- Mind-sets resist change. Even in the ity, poor training and support, and a navy of Admiral Sergei Gorshkov, who Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2003 1 172 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Naval War College Review, Vol. 56 [2003], No. 3, Art. 18 significant lack of understanding of the loss of almost forty ships, recrimina- tactical situation. In this book, George tions were made against various leaders, Buker, a retired Navy commander, pro- including allegations against naval force fessor of history, and an accomplished commander Captain Dudley Saltonstall author, provides a significant account of responsibility for the overall result; of this much overlooked effort by the and against Paul Revere, an icon of the combined forces of the Massachusetts Revolutionary War who served in the and Maine militia, Continental Navy expedition as a lieutanant colonel in and Marines, and various privateer charge of the artillery, of unsoldierly groups. Buker also provides an interest- conduct. In the end, it was Captain ing glimpse of the internal politics and Saltonstall who bore the brunt of the personalities of the colonies, especially smear campaign by Massachusetts poli- in Massachusetts during the American ticians to shift the blame. Revolution. He further provides a com- In the final chapters, and through the plementary argument that the Massa- lens of history, Buker argues that in- chusetts political authorities, when deed a conspiracy by the Massachusetts confronted with the dismal failure of politicians, through their committee of the expedition, set in motion an inquiry inquiry, manipulated the results of their that may have been a conspiracy of po- investigation and attempted to influ- litical self-interest. ence the outcome of the court-martial The book appears well researched, with of Saltonstall by Continental Navy au- significant endnotes and bibliography. thorities. Their efforts ensured the de- Reading almost like a novel, it tells the sired results of exonerating their native story of the Penobscot expedition in son, militia general Solomon Lovell, great detail and addresses the issues that and provided the justification needed to led up to its failure and the resulting in- assess the Continental government for a quiry. In appropriately titled chapters portion of the monetary cost. Buker, Buker provides a historical overview however, provides technical and tactical leading up to the expedition, including reasons that may have led to the failure the British policy, orders for military of the expedition. Further, he indicates operations along coastal Maine, and, that only Captain Saltonstall fully ap- of course, the colonial response to the preciated the tactical and operational threat to the extended territory of circumstances, as well as the limited ca- Massachusetts, now the state of Maine. pability of his resources and ships in the As expected, the majority of the book confined waters around Penobscot Bay. deals with the actual operations, from These considerations were evidently ex- outfitting and the order of battle to the cluded or ignored by the politicians in assaults and resulting siege at Castine, their single-minded desire to find a to the hasty retreat and then rout of co- scapegoat for the failure. lonial forces when superior Royal Navy Overall, this is a fine historical account- forces arrived, and finally to the sequel, ing of this chapter in American history. in which the expedition’s personnel My one large criticism is that the one walked back to Massachusetts from simple map provided is inadequate for Maine after burning their ships. After a full understanding of the operations. the failure of the expedition and the This reviewer has the benefit of having https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol56/iss3/18 2 BOOK REVIEWS 173 Goodman: The Penobscot Expedition: Commodore Saltonstall and theMassachuse been stationed in Castine, Maine, and is attack, endures brutal weather, and cre- geographically aware of the area; I have ates an increasingly difficult political walked the earthen ramparts of Fort situation for senior national security George and the various other entrench- leaders who believe the Pepperdogs are ments around Castine. It would have risking diplomatic solutions. There is at been most helpful to the general reader one point the suggestion that even the had additional detailed military maps murder of one Marine would not be been included with each phase of the worth upsetting diplomatic peace ini- expedition. Well placed photographs of tiatives. The Pepperdogs make political the area would have further added to matters worse by leaving a path of de- the historical understanding of the struction while ignoring direct orders events, as would photos of the various to end their chase. earthworks, trenches, the defensive Setbacks are many, but perseverance canal, and Fort George, which all still and tactical teamwork always (well, al- exist as historical landmarks. most always) gets them out of tight JAMES B. GOODMAN spots. One remembers those great mo- Commander, U.S. Navy ments when the cavalry arrived and Naval War College everyone cheered. But this team is dif- ferent from the cavalry; the Pepperdogs take performance-enhancing drugs and rarely need to rest. One team member creates an Internet website that pro- West, Bing. The Pepperdogs. New York: Simon & vides the public with real-time informa- Schuster, 2002. 365pp. $25 tion on their progress and problems. The Pepperdogs ranks with The Hunt for The public cheers them on, reducing Red October. It is a work of fiction con- the policy-making flexibility of political structed around reality, brimming with leaders. West skillfully introduces the action and genuine insight into the Internet as a source of potential direct emerging warfighting capabilities of the information from individuals in the new ground soldier. West develops his battle to the public. That information story around a Marine reconnaissance would have obvious constraining effects team. That team, the “Pepperdogs,” is on future national security decision- made up of six reservists of varying ci- making latitude and would yield differ- vilian backgrounds; all have extraordi- ent perspectives on progress and nary courage, physical and mental problems.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fourteenth Colony: Florida and the American Revolution in the South
    THE FOURTEENTH COLONY: FLORIDA AND THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION IN THE SOUTH By ROGER C. SMITH A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 © 2011 Roger C. Smith 2 To my mother, who generated my fascination for all things historical 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Jon Sensbach and Jessica Harland-Jacobs for their patience and edification throughout the entire writing process. I would also like to thank Ida Altman, Jack Davis, and Richmond Brown for holding my feet to the path and making me a better historian. I owe a special debt to Jim Cusack, John Nemmers, and the rest of the staff at the P.K. Yonge Library of Florida History and Special Collections at the University of Florida for introducing me to this topic and allowing me the freedom to haunt their facilities and guide me through so many stages of my research. I would be sorely remiss if I did not thank Steve Noll for his efforts in promoting the University of Florida’s history honors program, Phi Alpha Theta; without which I may never have met Jim Cusick. Most recently I have been humbled by the outpouring of appreciation and friendship from the wonderful people of St. Augustine, Florida, particularly the National Association of Colonial Dames, the ladies of the Women’s Exchange, and my colleagues at the St. Augustine Lighthouse and Museum and the First America Foundation, who have all become cherished advocates of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 34159 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS AVIATION SAFETY and NOISE Millions of People Around Major Airports
    November 29, 1979 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 34159 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS AVIATION SAFETY AND NOISE millions of people around major airports. It On October 22 the Senate passed H.R 2440, would also weaken the incentives for replace­ striking the provisions of the House ini­ REDUCTION ACT ment of aircraft with new technology air­ tiated b111 and substituting for them the planes that could offer even more noise relief provisions of S. 413, the Senate "noise bill". to the millions of Americans who are ex­ I am advised the Senate has already ap­ HON. NORMAN Y. M!NETA posed daily to unacceptable levels of aircraft pointed conferees in anticipation of a con­ OF CALIFORNLA noise. ference on H.R. 2440. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 3. By authorizing some $300 mi111on in In expressing the Administration's opposi­ excess of the President's budget for FY 1980, tion to H.R. 3942, I outlined a number of Thursday, November 29, 1979 an increase which ls unwarranted, the bill objectionable features of the b1ll. The pro­ e Mr. MINETA. Mr. Speaker, I ha;ve would be infiationary. In any event, as you visions of H.R. 2440, as passed by the Senate, asked the White House for a clear sig­ know, the House already acted to establish a.ire comparable in many respects to those an obligations limit on the airport devel­ undesirable fiseal and environmental provi­ nal that legislation rolling back the fieet opment program for 1980 at a level which is sions of H.R. 3942 to which we are opposed; noise rule would be vetoed.
    [Show full text]
  • David Library of the American Revolution Guide to Microform Holdings
    DAVID LIBRARY OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GUIDE TO MICROFORM HOLDINGS Adams, Samuel (1722-1803). Papers, 1635-1826. 5 reels. Includes papers and correspondence of the Massachusetts patriot, organizer of resistance to British rule, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and Revolutionary statesman. Includes calendar on final reel. Originals are in the New York Public Library. [FILM 674] Adams, Dr. Samuel. Diaries, 1758-1819. 2 reels. Diaries, letters, and anatomy commonplace book of the Massachusetts physician who served in the Continental Artillery during the Revolution. Originals are in the New York Public Library. [FILM 380] Alexander, William (1726-1783). Selected papers, 1767-1782. 1 reel. William Alexander, also known as “Lord Sterling,” first served as colonel of the 1st NJ Regiment. In 1776 he was appointed brigadier general and took command of the defense of New York City as well as serving as an advisor to General Washington. He was promoted to major- general in 1777. Papers consist of correspondence, military orders and reports, and bulletins to the Continental Congress. Originals are in the New York Historical Society. [FILM 404] American Army (Continental, militia, volunteer). See: United States. National Archives. Compiled Service Records of Soldiers Who Served in the American Army During the Revolutionary War. United States. National Archives. General Index to the Compiled Military Service Records of Revolutionary War Soldiers. United States. National Archives. Records of the Adjutant General’s Office. United States. National Archives. Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty and Warrant Application Files. United States. National Archives. Revolutionary War Rolls. 1775-1783. American Periodicals Series I. 33 reels. Accompanied by a guide.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chapter in Penobscot History
    The Rebirth of a Nation? A Chapter in Penobscot History NICHOLAS N. SMITH Brunswick, Maine THE EARLIEST PERIOD The first treaty of peace between the Maine Indians and the English came to a successful close in 1676 (Williamson 1832.1:519), and it was quickly followed by a second with other Indians further upriver. On 28 April 1678, the Androscoggin, Kennebec, Saco and Penobscot went to Casco Bay and signed a peace treaty with commissioners from Massachusetts. By 1752 no fewer than 13 treaties were signed between Maine Indians negotiating with commissioners representing the Colony of Massachu­ setts, who in turn represented the English Crown. In 1754, George II of England, defining Indian tribes as "independent nations under the protec­ tion of the Crown," declared that henceforth only the Crown itself would make treaties with Indians. In 1701 Maine Indians signed the Great Peace of Montreal (Havard [1992]: 138); in short, the French, too, recognized the Maine tribes as sov­ ereign entities with treaty-making powers. In 1776 the colonies declared their independence, terminating the Crown's regulation of treaties with Maine Indians; beween 1754 and 1776 no treaties had been made between the Penobscot and England. On 19 July 1776 the Penobscot, Passamaquoddy, Maliseet and Micmac Indi­ ans acknowledged the independence of the American colonies, when a delegation from the tribes went to George Washington's headquarters to declare their allegiance to him and offered to fight for his cause. John Allan, given a Colonel's rank, was the agent for the Passamaquoddy, Maliseet and Micmac, but refused to work with the Penobscot, ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Security Maine After Penobscot
    Maine History Volume 21 Number 3 Article 2 1-1-1982 The Search for Security Maine after Penobscot James S. Leamon Bates College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Leamon, James S.. "The Search for Security Maine after Penobscot." Maine History 21, 3 (1982): 119-154. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal/vol21/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JAMES S. LEAMON T he Search for Security Maine after Penobscot The Penobscot campaign of 1779 made little impact on the military outcome of the American Revolution. The focus of military action was shifting to the southern states when the British seized Bagaduce (Castine) at the mouth of the Penobscot River and defeated the expedition dispatched by Massachusetts to drive them out.1 For people in the District of Maine, however, the Penobscot defeat represented a calamity of the first order. During the rest of the war, they had to contend with a garrison of regular British troops in their midst. To Bagaduce flocked loyalists who, with a vigor sharpened by vengeance, joined the regulars in plundering the coast. Active loyalist participation injected a new note of personal vindictiveness in what now became a civil war. Amid internal dissension and a growing sense of isolation and despair, unified defense collapsed throughout the District.
    [Show full text]
  • The Excavation of the Privateer Defence David C
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 12 1983 Symposium on Archaeology of the Revolutionary War Period Held at New Windsor Article 9 Cantonment State Historic Site, New Windsor, New York 1983 The Excavation of the Privateer Defence David C. Switzer Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Switzer, David C. (1983) "The Excavation of the Privateer Defence," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 12 12, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol12/iss1/9 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol12/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. 43 Due to a combination of factors such as The Excavation of the poor planning, poor leadership, ill-trained Privateer Defence and poorly equipped militia, and over confidence soon to be replaced by low morale, by David C. Switzer the expedition failed to interrupt the British activities. The arrival of a small Royal Navy INTRODUCTION squadron of five vessels under the command of Admiral Sir George Collier broke the siege During the early morning hours of that had been initiated by the American force. August 14, 1779, a vessel sank in an inlet The troops were evacuated, and, pursued by the immediately west of Penobscot River on the British, the American fleet retreated up the coast of Maine. The vessel was a Revolutionary War privateer, the 16-gun brig Penobscot River on August 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • B I C K E R S T a F F's Books, Maps &C
    B I C K E R S T A F F’s Books, Maps &c. Fine Americana: Books, Periodicals, Maps & Views November, 2016 B I C K E R S T A F F’s Books, Maps &c. Six Old Colony Lane, Scarborough, (District of) Maine 04074 USA Telephone: 207-883-1119 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.bickerstaffs.com Account of the Boston Tea Party and a Very Scarce Boston Map in a Dublin Magazine, 1774 1. [American Revolution.] [Boston Map.] The Gentleman's and London Magazine: or, Monthly Chronologer. MDCCLXXIV. [1774]. Dublin: Printed by John Exshaw. 800 pp. plus indices. Quarter calf over very worn marbled boards. Red spine label with gilt title. Considerable erosion along joints. Lacking endpapers. Lacking most plates and with several leaves partially loosened from the text block. Despite the title, this Magazine was published in Dublin. It is the volume of twelve issues plus indices for the year 1774. There is considerable reporting of the American unrest, including "Thoughts of a Traveller upon our American Disputes" (pp. 789-794). An account of the closing of the port of Boston as of June 1notes that the day was observed as one of mourning "at Harvard in Connecticut [sic]" with bells ringing, the town-house draped in black and shops closed. Most significant, however, is a nice report on the Boston tea party and the events leading to it (pp. 84-85). Finally, an extremely uncommon map of Boston remains bound into the volume in the June, 1774 issue (opposite p. 358). Titled A New and Accurate Plan of the Town of Boston, in New England, the map is clearly based on a very similar map that appeared in the May, 1774 issue of the London-based Universal Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Penobscot Indian Dispossession Between 1808 and 1835 Jacques Ferland
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Maine Maine History Volume 43 Article 3 Number 2 Reconstructing Maine's Wabanaki History 8-1-2007 Tribal Dissent or White Aggression?: Interpreting Penobscot Indian Dispossession Between 1808 and 1835 Jacques Ferland Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mainehistoryjournal Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ferland, Jacques. "Tribal Dissent or White Aggression?: Interpreting Penobscot Indian Dispossession Between 1808 and 1835." Maine History 43, 2 (2007): 124-170. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal/vol43/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. John Neptune served as Lieutenant-Governor of the Penobscot Nation for over fifty years. He, along with Tribal Governor John Attean, presided over the tribe during a period of turmoil in Penobscot history — a time marked by land dis- possession and subsequent tribal division in the first part of the nineteenth cen- tury. The portrait was painted by Obadiah Dickinson in 1836 and hung in the Blaine House for many years. Courtesy of the Maine Arts Commission. TRIBAL DISSENT OR WHITE AGGRESSION?: INTERPRETING PENOBSCOT INDIAN DISPOSSES- SION BETWEEN 1808 AND 1835. BY JACQUES FERLAND “I now come to the time when our Tribe was separated into two fac- tions[,] the old and the new Party. I am sorry to speak of it as it was very detrimental to our tribe as there was but few of us the remnant of a once powerful tribe.” So spoke Penobscot tribal leader John Attean, re- calling the 1834-1835 breach in tribal politics that shook the edifice of community and cohesion among the Penobscot people.
    [Show full text]
  • King Philip's War in Maine
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 1-1970 King Philip's War in Maine John O. Noble Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Noble, John O. Jr., "King Philip's War in Maine" (1970). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3256. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3256 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KING PHILIP’S WAR IN MAINE By JOHN O. NOBLE, JR. A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) The Graduate School University of Maine Orono January, 1970 KING PHILIP'S WAR IN MAINE By John 0. Noble, Jr. An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History). January, 1970 A study was made of the Indian war in Maine, which started in the late summer of 1675 and continued until the spring of *1678 The causes and consequences of the war are presented as they relate to the situation on the Northern colonial frontier (Maine), and as they contrast to the war and social situation in southern New England. The two major campaigns of the war in Maine are examined in detail. Three political questions are discussed as related to the war: (1) the legal control of Maine (2) the support of the war effort by the United Colonies of New England; and (3) the pacification effort of Massachusetts and New York to subdue the Maine Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • Centerpiece of Research on the Penobscot Experimental Forest: the U.S
    CENTERPIECE OF RESEARCH ON THE PENOBSCOT EXPERIMENTAL FOREST: THE U.S. FOREST SERVICE LONG-TERM SILVICULTURAL STUDY John C. Brissette and Laura S. Kenefic Abstract.—Established between 1952 and 1957, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service experiment comparing several silvicultural treatments is not only the centerpiece of research on the Penobscot Experimental Forest in Maine, it is also one of the longest-running, replicated studies of how management techniques influence forest dynamics in North America. Ten treatments representing even- and uneven- aged silvicultural systems and exploitative cutting are replicated twice on operational- scale experimental units averaging 21 acres in size. Treatments are applied uniformly to experimental units in accordance with prescriptions designed to direct both stand structure and composition. In some treatments harvests are scheduled at intervals (e.g., 5, 10, or 20 years); in others, harvests are triggered by stand conditions. Each experimental unit, or compartment (most recently termed management unit), has an average of 18 permanent sample plots (PSPs) for measuring attributes of trees ≥0.5 inches in diameter at breast height. Tree regeneration and other vegetation are measured on multiple subplots within each PSP. Measurements are taken before and after harvests and, in many treatments, at intervals between harvests. Over the past 60 years, this long-term experiment and associated short-term studies have generated fundamental knowledge about forest ecosystems and silvicultural guidelines for the northern conifer forest type, and, in a more general sense, have contributed to our understanding of mixed-species forest science and management. INTRODUCTION research has proceeded on the PEF with periodic harvests and regular re-measurement of treatment Between 1952 and 1957 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Canadian Sources Related to Southern Revolutionary War
    Research Project for Southern Revolutionary War National Parks National Parks Service Solicitation Number: 500010388 GUIDE TO CANADIAN SOURCES RELATED TO SOUTHERN REVOLUTIONARY WAR NATIONAL PARKS by Donald E. Graves Ensign Heritage Consulting PO Box 282 Carleton Place, Ontario Canada, K7C 3P4 in conjunction with REEP INC. PO Box 2524 Leesburg, VA 20177 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND GUIDE TO CONTENTS OF STUDY 1A: Object of Study 1 1B: Summary of Survey of Relevant Primary Sources in Canada 1 1C: Expanding the Scope of the Study 3 1D: Criteria for the Inclusion of Material 3 1E: Special Interest Groups (1): The Southern Loyalists 4 1F: Special Interest Groups (2): Native Americans 7 1G: Special Interest Groups (3): African-American Loyalists 7 1H: Special Interest Groups (4): Women Loyalists 8 1I: Military Units that Fought in the South 9 1J: A Guide to the Component Parts of this Study 9 PART 2: SURVEY OF ARCHIVAL SOURCES IN CANADA Introduction 11 Ontario Queen's University Archives, Kingston 11 University of Western Ontario, London 11 National Archives of Canada, Ottawa 11 National Library of Canada, Ottawa 27 Archives of Ontario, Toronto 28 Metropolitan Toronto Reference Library 29 Quebec Archives Nationales de Quebec, Montreal 30 McCord Museum / McGill University Archives, Montreal 30 Archives de l'Universite de Montreal 30 New Brunswick 32 Provincial Archives of New Brunswick, Fredericton 32 Harriet Irving Memorial Library, Fredericton 32 University of New Brunswick Archives, Fredericton 32 New Brunswick Museum Archives,
    [Show full text]
  • Basketry of the Wabanaki Indians
    Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_10220-2 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 Basketry of the Wabanaki Indians Jennifer S. Neptunea* and Lisa K. Neumanb* aMaine Indian Basketmakers Alliance, Indian Island, ME, USA bThe University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA The Wabanaki The Wabanaki (People of the Dawn Land) are living Algonquian-speaking indigenous Native North Americans whose traditional homelands comprise what is today northern New England in the United States as well as Southeastern Quebec and the Canadian maritime provinces of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island. In the United States, there are five federally recognized Wabanaki tribes, all of which reside in the state of Maine: the Penobscot Nation (with a reservation in Penobscot County, Maine), the Passamaquoddy Tribe at Pleasant Point or Sipayik (with a reservation in Washington County, Maine), the Passamaquoddy Tribe at Indian Township (also with a reservation in Washington County, Maine), the Houlton Band of Maliseet (in Aroostook County, Maine), and the Aroostook Band of Micmac (also in Aroostook County, Maine). The Wabanaki also own trust lands (property with federal status owned by the tribe or tribal members) and fee lands (taxable property owned by tribal members but for which a tribe regulates use) in other parts of the state of Maine (Fig. 1). As of 2014, there were approximately 8,000 people on the membership rolls of the five Wabanaki tribes in Maine, with a far greater number in Canada. A note here on terminology is important to avoid confusion.
    [Show full text]