DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of the Numerous Benefits Versus the Biosecurity Concerns of Conotoxin Research Bjørn-Yoshimoto, Walden E.; Ramiro, Iris Bea L.; Yandell, Mark; Mcintosh, J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of the Numerous Benefits Versus the Biosecurity Concerns of Conotoxin Research Bjørn-Yoshimoto, Walden E.; Ramiro, Iris Bea L.; Yandell, Mark; Mcintosh, J Curses or Cures A Review of the Numerous Benefits Versus the Biosecurity Concerns of Conotoxin Research Bjørn-Yoshimoto, Walden E.; Ramiro, Iris Bea L.; Yandell, Mark; McIntosh, J. Michael; Olivera, Baldomero M.; Ellgaard, Lars; Safavi-Hemami, Helena Published in: Biomedicines DOI: 10.3390/BIOMEDICINES8080235 Publication date: 2020 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Bjørn-Yoshimoto, W. E., Ramiro, I. B. L., Yandell, M., McIntosh, J. M., Olivera, B. M., Ellgaard, L., & Safavi- Hemami, H. (2020). Curses or Cures: A Review of the Numerous Benefits Versus the Biosecurity Concerns of Conotoxin Research. Biomedicines, 8(8), [235]. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOMEDICINES8080235 Download date: 29. sep.. 2021 biomedicines Review Curses or Cures: A Review of the Numerous Benefits Versus the Biosecurity Concerns of Conotoxin Research Walden E. Bjørn-Yoshimoto 1 , Iris Bea L. Ramiro 1 , Mark Yandell 2,3, J. Michael McIntosh 4,5,6, Baldomero M. Olivera 4, Lars Ellgaard 7 and Helena Safavi-Hemami 1,4,8,* 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; [email protected] (W.E.B.-Y.); [email protected] (I.B.L.R.) 2 Eccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; [email protected] 3 Utah Center for Genetic Discovery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA 4 School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; [email protected] (J.M.M.); [email protected] (B.M.O.) 5 George E. Whalen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA 6 Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA 7 Department of Biology, Linderstrøm-Lang Centre for Protein Science, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; [email protected] 8 Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 19 July 2020; Published: 22 July 2020 Abstract: Conotoxins form a diverse group of peptide toxins found in the venom of predatory marine cone snails. Decades of conotoxin research have provided numerous measurable scientific and societal benefits. These include their use as a drug, diagnostic agent, drug leads, and research tools in neuroscience, pharmacology, biochemistry, structural biology, and molecular evolution. Human envenomations by cone snails are rare but can be fatal. Death by envenomation is likely caused by a small set of toxins that induce muscle paralysis of the diaphragm, resulting in respiratory arrest. The potency of these toxins led to concerns regarding the potential development and use of conotoxins as biological weapons. To address this, various regulatory measures have been introduced that limit the use and access of conotoxins within the research community. Some of these regulations apply to all of the 200,000 conotoxins predicted to exist in nature of which less than 0.05% are ≈ estimated to have any significant toxicity in humans. In this review we provide an overview of the many benefits of conotoxin research, and contrast these to the perceived biosecurity concerns of conotoxins and research thereof. Keywords: conotoxin; conopeptide; cone snail; venom; envenomations; fatalities; drugs; biosecurity; biomedicine 1. Introduction This article is divided into four sections. In the introductory section we provide an overview of the definition and classification of conotoxins, their chemical and pharmacological diversity, and a brief history of the methodologies used for conotoxin discovery. In the second section we highlight measurable scientific and societal benefits of conotoxin research with a view toward the future. The third section addresses biosecurity concerns and past and current regulations of conotoxins. In this section we discuss fatalities resulting from cone snail envenomations, toxicity data of selected Biomedicines 2020, 8, 235; doi:10.3390/biomedicines8080235 www.mdpi.com/journal/biomedicines Biomedicines 2020, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 23 Biomedicines 2020, 8, 235 2 of 22 section we discuss fatalities resulting from cone snail envenomations, toxicity data of selected conotoxins,conotoxins, the the potential potential misuse misuse of conotoxins of conotoxins as biological as biological weapons, weapons, and their an fictionald their usefictional as murder use as weaponsmurder in weapons the literature in the and literature popular and media. popular In the me concludingdia. In the remarks, concluding we assess remarks, the e ffweectiveness assess the andeffectiveness justification and of regulations justification and of suggest regulations revisions and of suggest some current revisions regulatory of some measures. current regulatory measures. 1.1. Conotoxin Definition, Classification, and Discovery 1.1. Conotoxin Definition, Classification, and Discovery Venomous cone snails comprise a large and diverse lineage of marine gastropods within the family ofVenomous Conidae (superfamilycone snails comprise Conoidea) a large [1–4]. and Based diverse on molecular lineage of phylogenetic marine gastropods data, cone within snails the canfamily be grouped of Conidae into (superfamily57 distinct clades Conoidea) (or subgenera) [1–4]. Based [5], on all molecular of which usephylogenetic venom for data, prey cone capture snails ≈ (examplescan be grouped shown in into Figure ≈571 distinct). clades (or subgenera) [5], all of which use venom for prey capture (examples shown in Figure 1). FigureFigure 1. Shells1. Shells of of selected selected cone cone snail snail species species from from nine nine subgenera subgenera (for (for subgenus subgenus classification classification see see [5]). [5]). TopTop row: row: fish-hunting fish-hunting cone cone snails snails (from (from left left to right:to right:Conus Conus geographus geographus(Gastridium (Gastridium), Conus), Conus magus magusand and ConusConus consors consors(Pionoconus (Pionoconus), Conus), Conus purpurascens purpurascens(Chelyconus (Chelyconus)), middle)), middle row: row: snail-hunting snail-hunting cone cone snails snails (Conus(Conus marmoreus marmoreus(Conus (Conus), Conus), Conus textile textileand andConus Conus ammiralis ammiralis (Cylinder (Cylinder), Conus), Conus omaria omaria(Darioconus (Darioconus)), )), bottombottom row: row: worm-hunting worm-hunting species species (Conus (Conus imperialis imperialisand andConus Conus regius regius(Stephanoconus (Stephanoconus), Conus), Conus pulicarius pulicarius (Puncticulis(Puncticulis), Conus), Conus mustelinus mustelinus(Rhizoconus (Rhizoconus)). Shells)). Shells not not to scale.to scale. In the most basic sense, a conotoxin is a toxin identified from any of the 1000 living cone In the most basic sense, a conotoxin is a toxin identified from any of the ≈1000≈ living cone snails. snails. The majority of conotoxins are gene-derived peptides that are synthesized at the ribosome The majority of conotoxins are gene-derived peptides that are synthesized at the ribosome and and further processed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus of the secretory cells further processed in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus of the secretory cells of the venom gland. Small molecules of non-peptidic nature have also been isolated from cone snail venom. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 235 3 of 22 of the venom gland. Small molecules of non-peptidic nature have also been isolated from cone snail venom. These have traditionally not been defined as “conotoxins”, but instead named according to their characteristic chemical structures (for example [6,7]). Cone snail small molecules have not been subject to regulation and will therefore not be further discussed in this review. The majority of conotoxins identified to date contain disulfide bonds that are formed between cysteine residues to confer structural stability and resistance against proteolytic degradation [8]. However, not all conotoxins contain cysteines and it has been suggested that conotoxins should be classified into those that are cysteine-rich (i.e., containing more than one disulfide bond) and those that are cysteine-poor (i.e., containing only one or no disulfide bonds). The term “conopeptide” was suggested to describe the latter group. However, this distinction has not received traction in the field and both terms conotoxin and conopeptide are now being used interchangeably [9]. Three biochemical and pharmacological features have been used to broadly classify conotoxins into distinct groups: their pharmacological target and activity (typically designated by a Greek letter), their cysteine framework (designated by Roman numerals) and their gene superfamily (designated by Latin letters). For example, conotoxins αA-GI and αM-MIIIJ both target the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) as represented by the Greek letter α but their genes and cysteine frameworks do not share any homology; one belongs to the A gene superfamily and has a type I cysteine framework while the other belongs to the M gene superfamily and has a type III cysteine framework. To date, more than 10 distinct pharmacological classes, 50 gene superfamilies, and 28 cysteine frameworks have been described [10], and more are likely to be discovered in the future. The five best studied pharmacological classes of conotoxins all target ion channels expressed in the nervous and locomotor systems: α (inhibitors of nAChR), ! (inhibitors of voltage-gated calcium
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cone Collector N°23
    THE CONE COLLECTOR #23 October 2013 THE Note from CONE the Editor COLLECTOR Dear friends, Editor The Cone scene is moving fast, with new papers being pub- António Monteiro lished on a regular basis, many of them containing descrip- tions of new species or studies of complex groups of species that Layout have baffled us for many years. A couple of books are also in André Poremski the making and they should prove of great interest to anyone Contributors interested in Cones. David P. Berschauer Pierre Escoubas Our bulletin aims at keeping everybody informed of the latest William J. Fenzan developments in the area, keeping a record of newly published R. Michael Filmer taxa and presenting our readers a wide range of articles with Michel Jolivet much and often exciting information. As always, I thank our Bernardino Monteiro many friends who contribute with texts, photos, information, Leo G. Ros comments, etc., helping us to make each new number so inter- Benito José Muñoz Sánchez David Touitou esting and valuable. Allan Vargas Jordy Wendriks The 3rd International Cone Meeting is also on the move. Do Alessandro Zanzi remember to mark it in your diaries for September 2014 (defi- nite date still to be announced) and to plan your trip to Ma- drid. This new event will undoubtedly be a huge success, just like the two former meetings in Stuttgart and La Rochelle. You will enjoy it and of course your presence is indispensable! For now, enjoy the new issue of TCC and be sure to let us have your opinions, views, comments, criticism… and even praise, if you feel so inclined.
    [Show full text]
  • BAST1986050004005.Pdf
    BASTERIA, 50: 93-150, 1986 Alphabetical revision of the (sub)species in recent Conidae. 9. ebraeus to extraordinarius with the description of Conus elegans ramalhoi, nov. subspecies H.E. Coomans R.G. Moolenbeek& E. Wils Institute of Taxonomic Zoology (Zoological Museum) University of Amsterdam INTRODUCTION In this ninth part of the revision all names of recent Conus taxa beginning with the letter e are discussed. Amongst these are several nominal species of tent-cones with a C.of close-set lines, the shell a darker pattern consisting very giving appearance (e.g. C. C. The elisae, euetrios, eumitus). phenomenon was also mentioned for C. castaneo- fasciatus, C. cholmondeleyi and C. dactylosus in former issues. This occurs in populations where with normal also that consider them specimens a tent-pattern are found, so we as colour formae. The effect is known shells in which of white opposite too, areas are present, leaving 'islands' with the tent-pattern (e.g. C. bitleri, C. castrensis, C. concatenatus and C. episco- These colour formae. patus). are also art. Because of a change in the rules of the ICZN (3rd edition, 1985: 73-74), there has risen a disagreement about the concept of the "type series". In cases where a museum type-lot consists of more than one specimen, although the original author(s) did not indicate that more than one shell was used for the description, we will designate the single originally mentioned and/or figured specimen as the "lectotype". Never- theless a number of taxonomists will consider that "lectotype" as the holotype, and disregard the remaining shells in the lot as type material.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse
    National Institute on Drug Abuse RESEARCH MONOGRAPH SERIES Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse 136 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Public Health Service • National Institutes of Health Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse Editor: Lynda Erinoff, Ph.D. NIDA Research Monograph 136 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based on the papers and discussions from a technical review on “Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse” held on May 20-21, 1991, in Bethesda, MD. The technical review was sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). COPYRIGHT STATUS NIDA has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other material in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors. Citation of the source is appreciated. Opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official policy of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or any other part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The U.S. Government does not endorse or favor any specific commercial product or company.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Gastéropodes Venimeux De La Famille Des Conidés Rencontrés En
    *£%: h^, ^^j f.'^*.."^- Document Technique No. 144 C-4KV LES GASTEROPODES VENIMEUX DE LA FAMILLE DES CONIDES RENCONTRES EN NOUVELLE-CALEDONIE René Sarrameçna i, COMMISSION DU PACIFIQUE SUD DOCUMENT TECHNIQUE No. 144 LES GASTEROPODES VENIMEUX DE LA FAMILLE DES CONIDES RENCONTRES EN NOUVELLE-CALEDONIE par René SARRAMEGNA Diplômé de l'Ecole Supérieure de Biologie — Paris Assistant à l'Institut PASTEUR de Nouméa VOLUME I APPAREIL VENIMEUX ET VENIN Travaux effectués à l'Institut PASTEUR de Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie COMMISSION DU PACIFIQUE SUD NOUMEA, NOUVELLE-CALEDONIE JUILLET 1964 PREFACE La Commission du Pacifique Sud, dans le programme de sa Section "Santé", possède un chapitre intitulé "Aide à la Recherche". Les crédits en sont destinés à apporter une participation à des recherches appliquées qui auraient une valeur prati­ que pour plusieurs territoires de la région. C'est ainsi qu'en octobre 1962 il fut décidé de satisfaire à une demande reçue de l'Institut PASTEUR de Nouméa. Le Directeur de cet organisme désirait effec­ tuer des études sur des venins de Conidés, mollusques responsables de plusieurs cas de décès en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Le travail fut confié à M. SARRAMEGNA, Assistant au laboratoire de l'Institut PASTEUR. Les insulaires du Pacifique Sud connaissent depuis toujours le danger de mani­ puler certains cônes venimeux. Les nouveaux venus, par contre, doivent être instruits de ce danger; c'est là un des buts de la présente publication. L'auteur y décrit les gastéropodes et leur appareil venimeux. Un second volume, en prépara­ tion, traitera des tests de toxicité effectués sur les venins des Conidés avec, com­ me application pratique, la préparation d'un sérum anti-venimeux.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hawaiian Species of Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda)1
    The Hawaiian Species of Conus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) 1 ALAN J. KOHN2 IN THECOURSE OF a comparative ecological currents are factors which could plausibly study of gastropod mollus ks of the genus effect the isolation necessary for geographic Conus in Hawaii (Ko hn, 1959), some 2,400 speciation . specimens of 25 species were examined. Un­ Of the 33 species of Conus considered in certainty ofthe correct names to be applied to this paper to be valid constituents of the some of these species prompted the taxo­ Hawaiian fauna, about 20 occur in shallow nomic study reported here. Many workers water on marine benches and coral reefs and have contributed to the systematics of the in bays. Of these, only one species, C. ab­ genus Conus; nevertheless, both nomencla­ breviatusReeve, is considered to be endemic to torial and biological questions have persisted the Hawaiian archipelago . Less is known of concerning the correct names of a number of the species more characteristic of deeper water species that occur in the Hawaiian archi­ habitats. Some, known at present only from pelago, here considered to extend from Kure dredging? about the Hawaiian Islands, may (Ocean) Island (28.25° N. , 178.26° W.) to the in the future prove to occur elsewhere as island of Hawaii (20.00° N. , 155.30° W.). well, when adequate sampling methods are extended to other parts of the Indo-West FAUNAL AFFINITY Pacific region. As is characteristic of the marine fauna of ECOLOGY the Hawaiian Islands, the affinities of Conus are with the Indo-Pacific center of distribu­ Since the ecology of Conus has been dis­ tion .
    [Show full text]
  • 45–60 (2018) a Survey of Marine Mollusc Diversity in The
    Phuket mar. biol. Cent. Res. Bull. 75: 45–60 (2018) 3 A SURVEY OF MARINE MOLLUSC DIVERSITY IN THE SOUTHERN MERGUI ARCHIPELAGO, MYANMAR Kitithorn Sanpanich1* and Teerapong Duangdee2 1 Institute of Marine Science, Burapha University, Tumbon Saensook, Amphur Moengchonburi, Chonburi 20131 Thailand 2 Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University 50, Paholyothin Road, Chaturachak, Bangkhen District, Bangkok, 10900 Thailand and Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food, Kasetsart University Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900 Thailand (CASAF, NRU-KU, Thailand) *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT: A coral reef ecosystem assessment and biodiversity survey of the Southern Mergui Archipelago, Myanmar was conducted during 3–10 February 2014 and 21–30 January 2015. Marine molluscs were surveyed at 42 stations: 41 by SCUBA and one intertidal beach survey. A total of 279 species of marine molluscs in three classes were recorded: 181 species of gastropods in 53 families, 97 species of bivalves in 26 families and a single species of cephalopod (Sepia pharaonis Ehrenberg, 1831). A mean of 21.8 species was recorded per site. The range was from 4 to 96 species. The highest diversity site was at Kyun Philar Island. The most widespread species were the pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758) (33 sites), muricid Chicoreus ramosus (Linnaeus, 1758) (21 stations), turbinid Astralium rhodostomum (Lamarck, 1822) (19 sites) and the wing shell Pteria penguin (Röding, 1798) (16 sites). Data from this study were compared with molluscan studies from the Gulf of Thailand, the Andaman Sea sites in Thailand and Singapore. Fifty-eight mollusc species in Myanmar were not found in the other areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosafety Level 1 and Rdna Training
    Biosafety Level 1and rDNA Training Office of Biological Safety Biosafety Level 1 and rDNA Training • Difference between Risk Group and Biosafety Level • NIH and UC policy on recombinant DNA • Work conducted at Biosafety Level 1 • UC Code of Conduct for researchers Biosafety Level 1 and rDNA Training What is the difference between risk group and biosafety level? Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • Risk Groups: Assigned to infectious organisms by global agencies (NIH, CDC, WHO, etc.) • In US, only assigned to human pathogens (NIH) • Biosafety Level (BSL): How the organisms are managed/contained (increasing levels of protection) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • RG1: Not associated with disease in healthy adults (non‐pathogenic E. coli; S. cerevisiae) • RG2: Cause diseases not usually serious and are often treatable (S. aureus; Legionella; Toxoplasma gondii) • RG3: Serious diseases that may be treatable (Y. pestis; B. anthracis; Rickettsia rickettsii; HIV) • RG4: Serious diseases with no treatment/cure (Hemorrhagic fever viruses, e.g., Ebola; no bacteria) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐1: Usually corresponds to RG1 – Good microbiological technique – No additional safety equipment required for biological work (may still need chemical/radiation protection) – Ability to destroy recombinant organisms (even if they are RG1) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐2: Same as BSL‐1, PLUS… – Biohazard signs – Protective clothing (lab coat, gloves, eye protection, etc.) – Biosafety cabinet (BSC) for aerosols is recommended but not always required – Negative airflow into room is recommended, but not always required Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐3: Same as BSL‐2, PLUS… – Specialized clothing (respiratory protection, Tyvek, etc.) – Directional air flow is required.
    [Show full text]
  • (Approx) Mixed Micro Shells (22G Bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22G Bag Provides Hours of Fun; Some Interesting Foraminifera Also Included
    Special Price £ US$ Family Genus, species Country Quality Size Remarks w/o Photo Date added Category characteristic (€) (approx) (approx) Mixed micro shells (22g bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22g bag provides hours of fun; some interesting Foraminifera also included. 17/06/21 Mixed micro shells Ischnochitonidae Callistochiton pulchrior Panama F+++ 89mm € 1,80 £1,55 $2,10 21/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Chaetopleura lurida Panama F+++ 2022mm € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Hairy girdles, beautifully preserved. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 30mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 27.9mm € 2,80 £2,42 $3,27 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Stenoplax limaciformis Panama F+++ 16mm+ € 6,50 £5,61 $7,60 Uncommon. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Philippines F+++ 25mm+ € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Hairy margins, beautifully preserved. 04/08/17 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Australia F+++ 25mm+ € 2,60 £2,25 $3,04 02/06/18 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 41mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 32mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 44mm+ € 5,00 £4,32 $5,85 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F++ 35mm € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 29mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography of Coral Reef Shore Gastropods in the Philippines
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274311543 Biogeography of Coral Reef Shore Gastropods in the Philippines Thesis · April 2004 CITATIONS READS 0 100 1 author: Benjamin Vallejo University of the Philippines Diliman 28 PUBLICATIONS 88 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: History of Philippine Science in the colonial period View project Available from: Benjamin Vallejo Retrieved on: 10 November 2016 Biogeography of Coral Reef Shore Gastropods in the Philippines Thesis submitted by Benjamin VALLEJO, JR, B.Sc (UPV, Philippines), M.Sc. (UPD, Philippines) in September 2003 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Marine Biology within the School of Marine Biology and Aquaculture James Cook University ABSTRACT The aim of this thesis is to describe the distribution of coral reef and shore gastropods in the Philippines, using the species rich taxa, Nerita, Clypeomorus, Muricidae, Littorinidae, Conus and Oliva. These taxa represent the major gastropod groups in the intertidal and shallow water ecosystems of the Philippines. This distribution is described with reference to the McManus (1985) basin isolation hypothesis of species diversity in Southeast Asia. I examine species-area relationships, range sizes and shapes, major ecological factors that may affect these relationships and ranges, and a phylogeny of one taxon. Range shape and orientation is largely determined by geography. Large ranges are typical of mid-intertidal herbivorous species. Triangualar shaped or narrow ranges are typical of carnivorous taxa. Narrow, overlapping distributions are more common in the central Philippines. The frequency of range sizesin the Philippines has the right skew typical of tropical high diversity systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosafety Manual 2017
    Biosafety Manual 2017 Revised 6/2017 Policy Statement It is the policy of Northern Arizona University (NAU) to provide a safe working environment. The primary responsibility for insuring safe conduct and conditions in the laboratory resides with the principal investigator. The Office of Biological Safety is committed to providing up-to-date information, training, and monitoring to the research and biomedical community concerning the safe conduct of biological, recombinant, and acute toxin research and the handling of biological materials in accordance with all pertinent local, state and federal regulations, guidelines, and laws. To that end, this manual is a resource, to be used in conjunction with the CDC and NIH guidelines, the NAU Select Agent Program, Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL), and other resource materials. Introduction This Biological Safety Manual is intended for use as a guidance document for researchers and clinicians who work with biological materials. It should be used in conjunction with the Laboratory-Specific Safety Manual, which provides more general safety information. These manuals describe policies and procedures that are required for the safe conduct of research at NAU. The NAU Personnel Policy on Safety 5.03 also provides guidance for safety in the workplace. Responsibilities In the academic research/teaching setting, the principal investigator (PI) is responsible for ensuring that all members of the laboratory are familiar with safe research practices. In the clinical laboratory setting, the faculty member who supervises the laboratory is responsible for safety practices. Lab managers, supervisors, technicians and others who provide supervisory roles in laboratories and clinical settings are responsible for overseeing the safety practices in laboratories and reporting any problems, accidents, and spills to the appropriate faculty member.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: PATTERNS IN
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: PATTERNS IN DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION OF BENTHIC MOLLUSCS ALONG A DEPTH GRADIENT IN THE BAHAMAS Michael Joseph Dowgiallo, Doctor of Philosophy, 2004 Dissertation directed by: Professor Marjorie L. Reaka-Kudla Department of Biology, UMCP Species richness and abundance of benthic bivalve and gastropod molluscs was determined over a depth gradient of 5 - 244 m at Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas by deploying replicate benthic collectors at five sites at 5 m, 14 m, 46 m, 153 m, and 244 m for six months beginning in December 1993. A total of 773 individual molluscs comprising at least 72 taxa were retrieved from the collectors. Analysis of the molluscan fauna that colonized the collectors showed overwhelmingly higher abundance and diversity at the 5 m, 14 m, and 46 m sites as compared to the deeper sites at 153 m and 244 m. Irradiance, temperature, and habitat heterogeneity all declined with depth, coincident with declines in the abundance and diversity of the molluscs. Herbivorous modes of feeding predominated (52%) and carnivorous modes of feeding were common (44%) over the range of depths studied at Lee Stocking Island, but mode of feeding did not change significantly over depth. One bivalve and one gastropod species showed a significant decline in body size with increasing depth. Analysis of data for 960 species of gastropod molluscs from the Western Atlantic Gastropod Database of the Academy of Natural Sciences (ANS) that have ranges including the Bahamas showed a positive correlation between body size of species of gastropods and their geographic ranges. There was also a positive correlation between depth range and the size of the geographic range.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LISTING of PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS Guido T
    August 2017 Guido T. Poppe A LISTING OF PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS - V1.00 THE LISTING OF PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS Guido T. Poppe INTRODUCTION The publication of Philippine Marine Mollusks, Volumes 1 to 4 has been a revelation to the conchological community. Apart from being the delight of collectors, the PMM started a new way of layout and publishing - followed today by many authors. Internet technology has allowed more than 50 experts worldwide to work on the collection that forms the base of the 4 PMM books. This expertise, together with modern means of identification has allowed a quality in determinations which is unique in books covering a geographical area. Our Volume 1 was published only 9 years ago: in 2008. Since that time “a lot” has changed. Finally, after almost two decades, the digital world has been embraced by the scientific community, and a new generation of young scientists appeared, well acquainted with text processors, internet communication and digital photographic skills. Museums all over the planet start putting the holotypes online – a still ongoing process – which saves taxonomists from huge confusion and “guessing” about how animals look like. Initiatives as Biodiversity Heritage Library made accessible huge libraries to many thousands of biologists who, without that, were not able to publish properly. The process of all these technological revolutions is ongoing and improves taxonomy and nomenclature in a way which is unprecedented. All this caused an acceleration in the nomenclatural field: both in quantity and in quality of expertise and fieldwork. The above changes are not without huge problematics. Many studies are carried out on the wide diversity of these problems and even books are written on the subject.
    [Show full text]