DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse National Institute on Drug Abuse RESEARCH MONOGRAPH SERIES Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse 136 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • Public Health Service • National Institutes of Health Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse Editor: Lynda Erinoff, Ph.D. NIDA Research Monograph 136 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service National Institutes of Health National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based on the papers and discussions from a technical review on “Assessing Neurotoxicity of Drugs of Abuse” held on May 20-21, 1991, in Bethesda, MD. The technical review was sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). COPYRIGHT STATUS NIDA has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other material in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors. Citation of the source is appreciated. Opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official policy of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or any other part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The U.S. Government does not endorse or favor any specific commercial product or company. Trade, proprietary, or company names appearing in this publication are used only because they are considered essential in the context of the studies reported herein. The chapters by Jensen and colleagues and Boyes were reviewed in accordance with US. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication: mention of trade names or commercial products in these chapters does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. NIDA Research Monographs are indexed in the “Index Medicus.” They are selectively included in the coverage of “American Statistics Index,” “BioSciences Information Service,” “Chemical Abstracts,” “Current Contents,” “Psychological Abstracts,” and “Psychopharmacology Abstracts.” National Institute on Drug Abuse NIH Publication No. 93-3644 Printed 1993 Contents Page Preface . v Lynda Erinoff Neurobehavioral Methods Used in Neurotoxicology. 1 Hugh A. Tilson Behavioral Consequences of Partial Monoamine Depletion in the CNS After Methamphetamine-Like Drugs: The Conflict Between Pharmacology and Toxicology. 34 Lewis S. Seiden, William L. Woolverton, Stanley A. Lorens, Joseph E.G. Williams, Rebecca L. Corwin, Norio Hata, Mary Olimski Strategies for Detecting Subclinical Monoamine Depletions in Humans . 53 Una D. McCann and George A. Ricaurte Sensory Evoked Potentials: Measures of Neurotoxicity . 63 William K. Boyes Silver Staining as a Tool for Neurotoxic Assessment . 101 Carlos A. Beltramino, José de Olmos, Ferenc Gallyas, Lennart Heimer, and Lászó Záborszky Mapping Toxicant-Induced Nervous System Damage With a Cupric Silver Stain: A Quantitative Analysis of Neural Degeneration Induced by 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine . 133 Karl F. Jensen, Jeanene Olin, Najwa Haykal-Coates, James O’Callaghan, Diane B. Miller, and José S. de Olmos iii Reactions of 5-HT Neurons to Drugs of Abuse: Neurotoxicity and Plasticity. .155 Mary Ann Wilson, Laura A. Mamounas, Kenneth H. Fasman, Karen J. Axt, and Mark E. Molliver Quantification of Reactive Gliosis as an Approach to Neurotoxicity Assessment. 188 James P. O’Callaghan and Diane B. Miller Pharmacokinetic Approaches to the Study of Drug Action and Toxicity. 213 Arthur K. Cho, Masayuki Hiramatsu, Yoshito Kumagai, and Nita Patel Mechanisms Mediating Biogenic Amine Deficits Induced by Amphetamine and Its Congeners. .226 James W. Gibb, Michel Johnson, Donna M. Stone, and Glen R. Hanson Neurotoxicity and Drugs of Abuse: Cannabinoid Interaction With Brain Glucocorticoid Receptors . .242 Philip W. Landfield and J. Charles Eldridge Nitric Oxide as a Mediator of Neurotoxicity . 253 Ted M. Dawson, Valina L. Dawson, and Solomon H. Snyder List of NIDA Research Monographs . 274 iv Preface This monograph is the result of a technical review meeting that was held May 20-21, 1991. The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) supports neurotoxicity research as part of its mandate to explore the consequences of drug abuse. This research has provided important data on the neurotoxicity of several abuse substances, such as amphetamine and its congeners; tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive component of marijuana; and phencyclidine. These NIDA-supported studies also have served to further public health on a broader scale by leading to the development of new methodologies for studying neurotoxicity and by elucidating general principles that will guide future research in neurotoxicology. During the course of the technical review meeting, a consensus was reached that no one technique could be used to define a neurotoxic effect but, rather, that confluent data from a variety of tests are needed to establish neurotoxicity. A variety of different methodologies were presented, although by no means all those being employed in the field. In general, the methodologies could be divided into those for screening or hazard identification and those for characterizing neurotoxicity, including studies of mechanism of action. Screens for evaluating large numbers of compounds are of great value to regulatory scientists and are useful in the drug abuse field to evaluate new drugs of abuse. Several presentations focused on screening methodologies based on behavior, neurophysiology, neuroanatomy, or neurochemistry. Other presentations focused on different methodologies designed to study underlying mechanisms of neurotoxicity. A knowledge of the basic mechanisms of neurotoxicity may help researchers understand some of the effects of drugs of abuse and may provide useful models for studying neurodegenerative diseases. At the meeting, Dr. John Olney presented a paper on MK801 neurotoxicity, but time constraints prevented him from writing a chapter for this monograph. To get a sense of the content of Dr. Olney’s talk, I recommend the paper by Olney, J.W.; LaBruyere, J.; Wang, G.; Wozniak, D.F.; Price, M.T.; and Sesma, M.A., “NMDA antagonist neurotoxicity: Mechanism and prevention,” Science, 254, 1515-1518, 1991. In addition to presenting different methodologies, Dr. Olney and colleagues pointed out the importance of understanding the neural circuitry mediating neurotoxic effects. V A number of neurotoxicologists and neuroscientists who did not present papers were active participants in this meeting and contributed to the lively discussion following each talk. Unfortunately, there is no roster of meeting participants, so I cannot thank each person individually. In transcribing the discussion, where possible I have identified the questioner. Several participants were identified by name on the tape, and they are Tom Sobotka, Ph.D., and Nate Appel, Ph.D., of the US. Food and Drug Administration; Diane Miller, Ph.D., of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and Rona Ramsay, Ph.D., of the University of California, San Francisco. I think the discussions were exceedingly valuable, and they have been included following each chapter. Because of taping failure, the discussions following the presentations by Dr. O’Callaghan and Dr. Cho were lost. I hope that the readers of this monograph get some sense of the enthusiasm of the participants and of the spirited discussions that took place on the state of the science. All the authors have provided superb chapters that should stimulate readers to think about the methodological issues raised in this monograph. AUTHOR Lynda Erinoff, Ph.D. Project Officer Neurosciences Research Branch Division of Basic Research National Institute on Drug Abuse Parklawn Building, Room 1DA-31 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 vi Neurobehavioral Methods Used in Neurotoxicology Hugh A. Tilson INTRODUCTION Neurotoxicity has been defined as any adverse effect on the structure or function of the central and/or peripheral nervous systems produced by a biological, chemical, or physical agent (Tilson 1990a). Historically, toxicity has been defined in anatomical or structural terms (Weiss 1988). It is now generally accepted that neurotoxic effects can be identified and characterized at one of many levels of organization of the nervous system, including the chemical, anatomical, physiological, and neurobehavioral levels. Recently, there has been an increased reliance on neurobehavioral indices of neurotoxicity to detect and characterize neurotoxicity (Weiss and Laties 1975; Zbinden et al. 1983; Annau 1986; Tilson 1987, l990b; Cory-Slechta 1989). It has been suggested that because behavior is the net result of integrated sensory, motor, and cognitive function occurring in the nervous system, chemical- induced changes in behavior may be a relatively sensitive indicator of nervous system dysfunction (National Academy of Sciences 1975). In some cases, the dose-effect curve for neurobehavioral measures may lie to the left of other endpoints of toxicity. As pointed out by Weiss (l988), neurobehavioral assessments are important because it is often the case that one of the earliest indications of exposure to neurotoxicants is subtle behavioral impairment such as paresthesias or short-term memory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interview with Pierre Pichot
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND THE HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRY PIERRE PICHOT Could we begin with your recollections of the 1955 Paris meeting, which was effectively the first world wide meeting on chlorpromazine. The meeting was organised in Paris by Jean Delay. It was supported by Specia, the pharmaceutical firm which had produced chlorpromazine, which was a branch of the Rhone Poulenc Group. For the first time people engaged in what was called psychopharmacology came together. They came from many countries, including the United States. The efficacy of the drug and the mechanism of action were discussed. However, at that time the biochemistry of the brain, as it exists now, was unknown. It was only at the beginning of the 60s, that we began to speak of the role of the neurotransmitters in the action of both neuroleptic drugs and antidepressants and of their potential abnormalities in the disease process. So in practice 1955 was only a meeting on therapy with chlorpromazine. I have always been very much impressed by the fact that chlorpromazine, which had been introduced only 3 years before, was already used all over the world. Theoretical ideas take usually a very long time to travel from one country to another, and sometimes they never make it. I quote always, the case of Karl Jaspers’ General Psychopathology, which is considered in the German speaking world as one of the basic books of psychiatry. This was published in 1913 but appeared in English translation only in 1963, 50 years later and, even then, a paper published in the American Journal of Psychiatry wrote ingenuously that, until this publication, many psychiatrists in the United States had not realised that Jaspers was not only a philosopher, but also a psychiatrist.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicology Mechanisms Underlying the Neurotoxicity Induced by Glyphosate-Based Herbicide in Immature Rat Hippocampus
    Toxicology 320 (2014) 34–45 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Toxicology j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicol Mechanisms underlying the neurotoxicity induced by glyphosate-based herbicide in immature rat hippocampus: Involvement of glutamate excitotoxicity Daiane Cattani, Vera Lúcia de Liz Oliveira Cavalli, Carla Elise Heinz Rieg, Juliana Tonietto Domingues, Tharine Dal-Cim, Carla Inês Tasca, ∗ Fátima Regina Mena Barreto Silva, Ariane Zamoner Departamento de Bioquímica, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil a r a t i b s c l t r e a i n f o c t Article history: Previous studies demonstrate that glyphosate exposure is associated with oxidative damage and neu- Received 23 August 2013 rotoxicity. Therefore, the mechanism of glyphosate-induced neurotoxic effects needs to be determined. Received in revised form 12 February 2014 ® The aim of this study was to investigate whether Roundup (a glyphosate-based herbicide) leads to Accepted 6 March 2014 neurotoxicity in hippocampus of immature rats following acute (30 min) and chronic (pregnancy and Available online 15 March 2014 lactation) pesticide exposure. Maternal exposure to pesticide was undertaken by treating dams orally ® with 1% Roundup (0.38% glyphosate) during pregnancy and lactation (till 15-day-old). Hippocampal Keywords: ® slices from 15 day old rats were acutely exposed to Roundup (0.00005–0.1%) during 30 min and experi- Glyphosate 45 2+ Calcium ments were carried out to determine whether glyphosate affects Ca influx and cell viability. Moreover, 14 we investigated the pesticide effects on oxidative stress parameters, C-␣-methyl-amino-isobutyric acid Glutamatergic excitotoxicity 14 Oxidative stress ( C-MeAIB) accumulation, as well as glutamate uptake, release and metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • Crews Lab Discovers Inflammatory Mechanisms Underlying Alcohol
    research alcohol actions on brain, liver, pancreas, fetus, the The Director’s Column endocrine system and the immune system, has contributed Thanks for your gifts to our Center! to Crews’ insights. Alternatively, I suspect that he A. Leslie Morrow, Ph.D. assembled this diverse group of researchers to study alcohol Dean’’’ s Club Ms. Carolyn S. Corn Mr. and Mrs. Ben Madore Associate Director, actions across so many systems of the body for the very Ms. Harriet W. Crisp Bowles Center for (annual gifts of $5000 and above) Ms. Regina J. Mahon purpose of discovering how the complex systemic and Mr. and Mrs. Ray Damerell Alcohol Studies Dr. William Maixner molecular roles of alcohol go awry in the disease of Center Line James A. Bowles Mr. Lewis A. Dancy Mrs. Melissa M. Mann Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies alcoholism. Mr. John N. Howard, Jr. Mr. F. E. Danielus Mr. and Mrs. H. J. McCarthy School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Mr. and Mrs. Robert F. Schaecher Mr. Stephen M. Dean and Ms. Patricia L. Ms. Michelle McCarthy This integration of research across systems, organs, brain Ms. Ann Lewallen Spencer Amend Mr. and Mrs. Robert H. McConville, Jr. Dr. Fulton Crews’ brilliance can be attributed in part to regions, human development and the progression to Our mission is to conduct, coordinate, and promote basic and clinical research on the causes, prevention, and treatment of alcoholism and alcoholic disease. Tennessee Medical Foundation Ms. Elizabeth L. Deaver Mr. and Mrs. Loyce L. McCormick his understanding that human beings are not just a alcoholism is the hallmark of research in the Bowles Center Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Multiple Sites of Action of Ibogaine
    ——Chapter 6—— CHARACTERIZATION OF MULTIPLE SITES OF ACTION OF IBOGAINE Henry Sershen, Audrey Hashim, And Abel Lajtha Nathan Kline Institute Orangeburg, New York 10962 I. Introduction.................................................................................................................. II. Issues Related to Ibogaine in the Treatment of Drug Dependence............................. A. Dopamine as a Primary Site of Drug-Mediated Responses .................................. B. Ibogaine or Its Metabolite and Acute versus Long-Term Effect........................... C. Single or Multiple Sites of Action of Ibogaine ..................................................... III. Effect of Ibogaine on Drug-Induced Behavior............................................................ IV. Binding Site Activity ................................................................................................... A. Relevant Site of Action.......................................................................................... V. Functional Activity ...................................................................................................... VI. Stimulant Drug Actions/Behaviors.............................................................................. VII. Current Non-Ibogaine Drug Treatment Protocols ....................................................... VIII. Conclusions.................................................................................................................. References...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Neurotoxin Β-N-Methylamino-L-Alanine (BMAA)
    The neurotoxin β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) Sources, bioaccumulation and extraction procedures Sandra Ferreira Lage ©Sandra Ferreira Lage, Stockholm University 2016 Cover image: Cyanobacteria, diatoms and dinoflagellates microscopic pictures taken by Sandra Ferreira Lage ISBN 978-91-7649-455-4 Printed in Sweden by Holmbergs, Malmö 2016 Distributor: Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University “Sinto mais longe o passado, sinto a saudade mais perto.” Fernando Pessoa, 1914. Abstract β-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) is a neurotoxin linked to neurodegeneration, which is manifested in the devastating human diseases amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. This neurotoxin is known to be produced by almost all tested species within the cyanobacterial phylum including free living as well as the symbiotic strains. The global distribution of the BMAA producers ranges from a terrestrial ecosystem on the Island of Guam in the Pacific Ocean to an aquatic ecosystem in Northern Europe, the Baltic Sea, where annually massive surface blooms occur. BMAA had been shown to accumulate in the Baltic Sea food web, with highest levels in the bottom dwelling fish-species as well as in mollusks. One of the aims of this thesis was to test the bottom-dwelling bioaccumulation hy- pothesis by using a larger number of samples allowing a statistical evaluation. Hence, a large set of fish individuals from the lake Finjasjön, were caught and the BMAA concentrations in different tissues were related to the season of catching, fish gender, total weight and species. The results reveal that fish total weight and fish species were positively correlated with BMAA concentration in the fish brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Occurrence of the Cyanotoxins BMAA, DABA and Anatoxin-A in Nebraska Reservoirs, Fish, and Aquatic Plants
    Toxins 2014, 6, 488-508; doi:10.3390/toxins6020488 OPEN ACCESS toxins ISSN 2072-6651 www.mdpi.com/journal/toxins Article Co-occurrence of the Cyanotoxins BMAA, DABA and Anatoxin-a in Nebraska Reservoirs, Fish, and Aquatic Plants Maitham Ahmed Al-Sammak 1,3, Kyle D. Hoagland 2, David Cassada 3 and Daniel D. Snow 3,* 1 Environmental Health, Occupational Health, & Toxicology, Tropical Biological Researches Unit, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Nebraska Water Center and School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-402-472-7539; Fax: +1-402-472-9599. Received: 12 November 2013; in revised form: 19 December 2013 / Accepted: 17 January 2014 / Published: 28 January 2014 Abstract: Several groups of microorganisms are capable of producing toxins in aquatic environments. Cyanobacteria are prevalent blue green algae in freshwater systems, and many species produce cyanotoxins which include a variety of chemical irritants, hepatotoxins and neurotoxins. Production and occurrence of potent neurotoxic cyanotoxins β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA), 2,4-diaminobutyric acid dihydrochloride (DABA), and anatoxin-a are especially critical with environmental implications to public and animal health. Biomagnification, though not well understood in aquatic systems, is potentially relevant to both human and animal health effects. Because little is known regarding their presence in fresh water, we investigated the occurrence and potential for bioaccumulation of cyanotoxins in several Nebraska reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosafety Level 1 and Rdna Training
    Biosafety Level 1and rDNA Training Office of Biological Safety Biosafety Level 1 and rDNA Training • Difference between Risk Group and Biosafety Level • NIH and UC policy on recombinant DNA • Work conducted at Biosafety Level 1 • UC Code of Conduct for researchers Biosafety Level 1 and rDNA Training What is the difference between risk group and biosafety level? Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • Risk Groups: Assigned to infectious organisms by global agencies (NIH, CDC, WHO, etc.) • In US, only assigned to human pathogens (NIH) • Biosafety Level (BSL): How the organisms are managed/contained (increasing levels of protection) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • RG1: Not associated with disease in healthy adults (non‐pathogenic E. coli; S. cerevisiae) • RG2: Cause diseases not usually serious and are often treatable (S. aureus; Legionella; Toxoplasma gondii) • RG3: Serious diseases that may be treatable (Y. pestis; B. anthracis; Rickettsia rickettsii; HIV) • RG4: Serious diseases with no treatment/cure (Hemorrhagic fever viruses, e.g., Ebola; no bacteria) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐1: Usually corresponds to RG1 – Good microbiological technique – No additional safety equipment required for biological work (may still need chemical/radiation protection) – Ability to destroy recombinant organisms (even if they are RG1) Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐2: Same as BSL‐1, PLUS… – Biohazard signs – Protective clothing (lab coat, gloves, eye protection, etc.) – Biosafety cabinet (BSC) for aerosols is recommended but not always required – Negative airflow into room is recommended, but not always required Risk Groups vs Biosafety Level • BSL‐3: Same as BSL‐2, PLUS… – Specialized clothing (respiratory protection, Tyvek, etc.) – Directional air flow is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Widespread and Differential Neurotoxicity In
    Neurotoxicity Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s12640-021-00330-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Widespread and Diferential Neurotoxicity in Venoms from the Bitis Genus of Viperid Snakes Nicholas J. Youngman1 · Richard J. Harris1 · Tam M. Huynh2 · Kristian Coster3 · Eric Sundman3 · Ralph Braun4 · Arno Naude5 · Wayne C. Hodgson2 · Bryan G. Fry1 Received: 24 November 2020 / Revised: 2 January 2021 / Accepted: 5 January 2021 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Research into the neurotoxic activity of venoms from species within the snake family Viperidae is relatively neglected com- pared with snakes in the Elapidae family. Previous studies into venoms from the Bitis genus of vipers have identifed the pres- ence of presynaptic phospholipase A2 neurotoxins in B. atropos and B. caudalis, as well as a postsynaptic phospholipase A2 in B. arietans. Yet, no studies have investigated how widespread neurotoxicity is across the Bitis genus or if they exhibit prey selectivity of their neurotoxins. Utilising a biolayer interferometry assay, we were able to assess the binding of crude venom from 14 species of Bitis to the neuromuscular α-1 nAChR orthosteric site across a wide range of vertebrate taxa mimotopes. Postsynaptic binding was seen for venoms from B. arietans, B. armata, B. atropos, B. caudalis, B. cornuta, B. peringueyi and B. rubida. To further explore the types of neurotoxins present, venoms from the representatives B. armata, B. caudalis, B. cornuta and B. rubida were additionally tested in the chick biventer cervicis nerve muscle preparation, which showed presynaptic and postsynaptic activity for B.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Approaches to Modifying Quinolinic Acid Striatal Lesions in Rats
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1988, B(10): 3901-3908 Systemic Approaches to Modifying Quinolinic Acid Striatal Lesions in Rats M. Flint Beal, Neil W. Kowall, Kenton J. Swartz, Robert J. Ferrante, and Joseph B. Martin Neurology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114 Quinolinic acid (QA) is an endogenous excitotoxin present mammalian brain, is an excitotoxin which producesaxon-spar- in mammalian brain that reproduces many of the histologic ing striatal lesions. We found that this compound produced a and neurochemical features of Huntington’s disease (HD). more exact model of HD than kainic acid, sincethe lesionswere In the present study we have examined the ability of a variety accompaniedby a relative sparingof somatostatin-neuropeptide of systemically administered compounds to modify striatal Y neurons (Beal et al., 1986a). QA neurotoxicity. Lesions were assessed by measurements If an excitotoxin is involved in the pathogenesisof HD, then of the intrinsic striatal neurotransmitters substance P, so- agentsthat modify excitotoxin lesionsin vivo could potentially matostatin, neuropeptide Y, and GABA. Histologic exami- be efficacious as therapeutic agents in HD. The best form of nation was performed with Nissl stains. The antioxidants therapy from a practical standpoint would be a drug that could ascorbic acid, beta-carotene, and alpha-tocopherol admin- be administered systemically, preferably by an oral route. In the istered S.C. for 3 d prior to striatal QA lesions had no sig- presentstudy we have therefore examined the ability of a variety nificant effect. Other drugs were administered i.p. l/2 hr prior of systemically administered drugs to modify QA striatal neu- to QA striatal lesions.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosafety Manual 2017
    Biosafety Manual 2017 Revised 6/2017 Policy Statement It is the policy of Northern Arizona University (NAU) to provide a safe working environment. The primary responsibility for insuring safe conduct and conditions in the laboratory resides with the principal investigator. The Office of Biological Safety is committed to providing up-to-date information, training, and monitoring to the research and biomedical community concerning the safe conduct of biological, recombinant, and acute toxin research and the handling of biological materials in accordance with all pertinent local, state and federal regulations, guidelines, and laws. To that end, this manual is a resource, to be used in conjunction with the CDC and NIH guidelines, the NAU Select Agent Program, Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL), and other resource materials. Introduction This Biological Safety Manual is intended for use as a guidance document for researchers and clinicians who work with biological materials. It should be used in conjunction with the Laboratory-Specific Safety Manual, which provides more general safety information. These manuals describe policies and procedures that are required for the safe conduct of research at NAU. The NAU Personnel Policy on Safety 5.03 also provides guidance for safety in the workplace. Responsibilities In the academic research/teaching setting, the principal investigator (PI) is responsible for ensuring that all members of the laboratory are familiar with safe research practices. In the clinical laboratory setting, the faculty member who supervises the laboratory is responsible for safety practices. Lab managers, supervisors, technicians and others who provide supervisory roles in laboratories and clinical settings are responsible for overseeing the safety practices in laboratories and reporting any problems, accidents, and spills to the appropriate faculty member.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluorine-18-FPH for PET Imaging of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
    32. Holman BL. Hcllman RS. Goldsmith SJ, et al. Biodislribution. dosimetry. and clinical 34. Suess E, Huck S, Reither H, Hortnagl H, Angelberger P. Uptake mechanism of evaluation of technetium-99m-ethyl cystcinate dimer in normal subjects and in patients technetium-99m-d. I-HMPAO in cell cultures of the dissociated postnatal rat cerebel with chronic cerebral infarction. J NucíMed 1989:30:1018-1024. lum. J NucíMed 1992:33:108-114. 33. Andersen AR. Technetium-99m-HMPAO: basic kinetic studies of a tracer of cerebral 35. Moretti JL, Caglar M, Weinmann P. Cerebral perfusion imaging tracers for SPECT: blood flow. Cerehrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1989:1:288-318. which one to choose? J NucíMed 1995:36:359-363. Fluorine-18-FPH for PET Imaging of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Andrew Horti, Ursula Scheffel, Marigo Stathis, Paige Finley, Hayden T. Ravert, Edythe D. London and Robert F. Dannais Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland; and Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland studied extensively. Molecular biological techniques have been Visualization of central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) applied in determining the amino acid sequences of the subunits with modern PET or SPECT imaging techniques has been ham that compose the receptor (1-3), autoradiographic techniques pered by the lack of a radioligand with suitable in vivo binding characteristics (i.e., high target-to-nontarget ratios and kinetics have been used to delineate the anatomical distribution of appropriate for the half-life of the tracer and imaging modality used). nAChRs in brain (4-7} and metabolic mapping studies have This paper describes in vivo binding, kinetics and pharmacology of demonstrated that the specific binding sites labeled in brain a highly potent 18F-labeled analog of epibatidine, (±)-exo-2-(2- with specific radioligands are coupled to functional activity (8).
    [Show full text]
  • Anew Drug Design Strategy in the Liht of Molecular Hybridization Concept
    www.ijcrt.org © 2020 IJCRT | Volume 8, Issue 12 December 2020 | ISSN: 2320-2882 “Drug Design strategy and chemical process maximization in the light of Molecular Hybridization Concept.” Subhasis Basu, Ph D Registration No: VB 1198 of 2018-2019. Department Of Chemistry, Visva-Bharati University A Draft Thesis is submitted for the partial fulfilment of PhD in Chemistry Thesis/Degree proceeding. DECLARATION I Certify that a. The Work contained in this thesis is original and has been done by me under the guidance of my supervisor. b. The work has not been submitted to any other Institute for any degree or diploma. c. I have followed the guidelines provided by the Institute in preparing the thesis. d. I have conformed to the norms and guidelines given in the Ethical Code of Conduct of the Institute. e. Whenever I have used materials (data, theoretical analysis, figures and text) from other sources, I have given due credit to them by citing them in the text of the thesis and giving their details in the references. Further, I have taken permission from the copyright owners of the sources, whenever necessary. IJCRT2012039 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org 284 www.ijcrt.org © 2020 IJCRT | Volume 8, Issue 12 December 2020 | ISSN: 2320-2882 f. Whenever I have quoted written materials from other sources I have put them under quotation marks and given due credit to the sources by citing them and giving required details in the references. (Subhasis Basu) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This preface is to extend an appreciation to all those individuals who with their generous co- operation guided us in every aspect to make this design and drawing successful.
    [Show full text]