DOCSLIB.ORG

VA0025101 Attachment 9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VA0025101 Attachment 9 H.L. Mooney Advanced Water Reclamation Facility (AWRF) VA0025101 Attachment 9 10. Disposal in a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill. (Complete Question 10 if sewage sludge from your facility is placed on a municipal solid waste landfill. Provide the following information for each municipal solid waste landfill on which sewage sludge from your facility is placed. If sewage sludge is placed on more than one municipal solid waste landfill, attach additional pages as necessary.) a. Landfill name: Atlantic Waste Disposal Inc. Sussex County b. Contact person: Rich Nolan Title: District Manager Phone: ( 804 ) 834 8300 Contact is: Landfill Owner X Landfill Operator c. Mailing address. Street or P.O. Box: 3474 Atlantic Lane City or Town: Waverly State: VA Zip: 23890 d. Landfill location. Street or Route #: 3474 Atlantic Lane County: Sussex County City or Town: Waverly State: VA Zip: 23890 e. Total dry metric tons per 365-day period of sewage sludge placed in this municipal solid waste landfill: 484.7 dry metric tons f. List, on this form or an attachment, the numbers of all federal, state or local permits that regulate the operation of this municipal solid waste landfill: Permit Number: Type of Permit: SWP 562 DEQ - MSW PRO - 51278 Air Permit g. Does sewage sludge meet applicable requirements in the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulation, 9 VAC 20-80-10 et seq., concerning the quality of materials disposed in a municipal solid waste landfill? X Yes No h. Does the municipal solid waste landfill comply with all applicable criteria set forth in the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulation, 9 VAC 20-80-10 et seq.? X Yes No i. Will the vehicle bed or other container used to transport sewage sludge to the municipal solid waste landfill be watertight and covered? _X_ Yes No Show the haul route(s) on a location map or briefly describe the route below and indicate the days of the week and time of the day sewage sludge will be transported. Route Description is on next page. Hauling was performed Monday to Friday during daylight hours. Atlantic Waste Driving directions to 3474 Atlantic Ln, Waverly, VA 23890 1851 Rippon Blvd Woodbridge, VA 22191 1. Head north 400 ft 2. Turn right toward Rippon Blvd 463 ft 3. Turn left toward Rippon Blvd 0.1 mi 4. Take the 1st left onto Rippon Blvd 1.0 mi 5. Continue onto Dale Blvd 0.8 mi 6. Take the I-95 S ramp to Richmond 0.4 mi 7. Keep left at the fork, follow signs for Rest Area 0.6 mi 8. Keep left at the fork, follow signs for I-95 S and merge onto I-95 S 70.3 mi 9. Take exit 84A on the left to merge onto I-295 S toward Rocky Mt NC/Richmond International 41.2 mi 10. Take exit 3A to merge onto US-460 E/County Dr toward Norfolk Continue to follow US-460 E 13.0 mi 11. Turn right onto VA-602/Cabin Point Rd 1.8 mi 12. Turn left onto Atlantic Ln Destination will be on the right 0.1 mi 3474 Atlantic Ln Waverly, VA 23890 10. Disposal in a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill. (Complete Question 10 if sewage sludge from your facility is placed on a municipal solid waste landfill. Provide the following information for each municipal solid waste landfill on which sewage sludge from your facility is placed. If sewage sludge is placed on more than one municipal solid waste landfill, attach additional pages as necessary.) a. Landfill name: Waste Management of VA, Inc. Charles City County Landfill b. Contact person: Don Jennings Title: Director, Public Works Phone: ( 804 ) 966 7210 Contact is: X Landfill Owner Landfill Operator c. Mailing address. Street or P.O. Box: 8000 Chambers Rd City or Town: Charles City State: VA Zip: 23030 d. Landfill location. Street or Route #: 8000 Chambers Road County: Charles City County City or Town: Charles City State: VA Zip: 23030 e. Total dry metric tons per 365-day period of sewage sludge placed in this municipal solid waste landfill: 0 dry metric tons f. List, on this form or an attachment, the numbers of all federal, state or local permits that regulate the operation of this municipal solid waste landfill: Permit Number: Type of Permit: SWP 531 DEQ - MSW g. Does sewage sludge meet applicable requirements in the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulation, 9 VAC 20-80-10 et seq., concerning the quality of materials disposed in a municipal solid waste landfill? X Yes No h. Does the municipal solid waste landfill comply with all applicable criteria set forth in the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulation, 9 VAC 20-80-10 et seq.? X Yes No i. Will the vehicle bed or other container used to transport sewage sludge to the municipal solid waste landfill be watertight and covered? _X_ Yes No Show the haul route(s) on a location map or briefly describe the route below and indicate the days of the week and time of the day sewage sludge will be transported. Route Description is on next page. Hauling was performed Monday to Friday during daylight hours. Driving directions to Charles City County Landfill 1851 Rippon Blvd Woodbridge, VA 22191 1. Head north 400 ft 2. Turn right toward Rippon Blvd 463 ft 3. Turn left toward Rippon Blvd 0.1 mi 4. Take the 1st left onto Rippon Blvd 1.0 mi 5. Continue onto Dale Blvd 0.8 mi 6. Take the I-95 S ramp to Richmond 0.4 mi 7. Keep left at the fork, follow signs for Rest Area 0.6 mi 8. Keep left at the fork, follow signs for I-95 S and merge onto I-95 S 70.3 mi 9. Take exit 84A on the left to merge onto I-295 S toward Rocky Mt NC/Richmond International 14.8 mi 10. Take exit 28A to merge onto I-64 E toward Norfolk/VA Beach 4.7 mi 11. Take exit 205 for VA-33 W toward VA-249 E/US-60/Bottoms Bridge/Quinton 0.3 mi 12. Keep right at the fork, follow signs for Virginia 33 W and merge onto VA-33 W 0.3 mi 13. Turn left onto US-60 E/Pocahontas Trail 4.0 mi 14. Turn right onto VA-106 S/VA-609 S/Roxbury Rd 1.3 mi 15. Turn left onto VA-609 S/Barnetts Rd 2.3 mi 16. Turn right onto Chambers Rd Destination will be on the left 151 ft Charles City County Landfill 8000 Chambers Rd Charles City, VA 23030 10. Disposal in a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill. (Complete Question 10 if sewage sludge from your facility is placed on a municipal solid waste landfill. Provide the following information for each municipal solid waste landfill on which sewage sludge from your facility is placed. If sewage sludge is placed on more than one municipal solid waste landfill, attach additional pages as necessary.) a. Landfill name: King George Landfill & Recycling Center b. Contact person: Jeff Jenkins Title: Manager Phone: ( 540 ) 775 3176 Contact is: Landfill Owner X Landfill Operator c. Mailing address. Street or P.O. Box: 10376 Bullock Dr. City or Town: King George State: VA Zip: 22485 d. Landfill location. Street or Route #: 10376 Bullock Dr County: King George City or Town: King George State: VA Zip: 22485 e. Total dry metric tons per 365-day period of sewage sludge placed in this municipal solid waste landfill: 0 dry metric tons f. List, on this form or an attachment, the numbers of all federal, state or local permits that regulate the operation of this municipal solid waste landfill: Permit Number: Type of Permit: SWP 586 DEQ -MSW g. Does sewage sludge meet applicable requirements in the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulation, 9 VAC 20-80-10 et seq., concerning the quality of materials disposed in a municipal solid waste landfill? X Yes No h. Does the municipal solid waste landfill comply with all applicable criteria set forth in the Virginia Solid Waste Management Regulation, 9 VAC 20-80-10 et seq.? X Yes No i. Will the vehicle bed or other container used to transport sewage sludge to the municipal solid waste landfill be watertight and covered? _X Yes No Show the haul route(s) on a location map or briefly describe the route below and indicate the days of the week and time of the day sewage sludge will be transported. Route Description is on next page. Hauling was performed Monday to Friday during daylight hours. King George Landfill & Recycling Center Driving directions to 10376 Bullock Dr, King George, VA 22485 1851 Rippon Blvd Woodbridge, VA 22191 1. Head north 400 ft 2. Turn right toward Rippon Blvd 463 ft 3. Turn left toward Rippon Blvd 0.1 mi 4. Take the 1st left onto Rippon Blvd 1.0 mi 5. Continue onto Dale Blvd 0.8 mi 6. Take the I-95 S ramp to Richmond 0.4 mi 7. Keep left at the fork, follow signs for Rest Area 0.6 mi 8. Keep left at the fork, follow signs for I-95 S and merge onto I-95 S 22.4 mi 9. Take exit 133A to merge onto US-17 BUS S/Warrenton Rd toward Falmouth 2.1 mi 10. Turn right onto Cambridge St 295 ft 11. Take the 1st right onto W Cambridge St 0.2 mi 12. Continue onto King St 436 ft 13. Continue onto Co Rd 607/River Rd 1.3 mi 14.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples
    SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors PREFACE Population growth, rapid urbanisation, more water intense consumption patterns and climate change are intensifying the pressure on freshwater resources. The increasing scarcity of water, combined with other factors such as energy and fertilizers, is driving millions of farmers and other entrepreneurs to make use of wastewater. Wastewater reuse is an excellent example that naturally explains the importance of integrated management of water, soil and waste, which we define as the Nexus While the information in this book are generally believed to be true and accurate at the approach. The process begins in the waste sector, but the selection of date of publication, the editors and the publisher cannot accept any legal responsibility for the correct management model can make it relevant and important to any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, expressed or the water and soil as well. Over 20 million hectares of land are currently implied, with respect to the material contained herein. known to be irrigated with wastewater. This is interesting, but the The opinions expressed in this book are those of the Case Authors. Their inclusion in this alarming fact is that a greater percentage of this practice is not based book does not imply endorsement by the United Nations University. on any scientific criterion that ensures the “safe use” of wastewater. In order to address the technical, institutional, and policy challenges of safe water reuse, developing countries and countries in transition need clear institutional arrangements and more skilled human resources, United Nations University Institute for Integrated with a sound understanding of the opportunities and potential risks of Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources wastewater use.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 Sewage Sludge Incineration
    2.2 Sewage Sludge Incineration There are approximately 170 sewage sludge incineration (SSI) plants in operation in the United States. Three main types of incinerators are used: multiple hearth, fluidized bed, and electric infrared. Some sludge is co-fired with municipal solid waste in combustors based on refuse combustion technology (see Section 2.1). Refuse co-fired with sludge in combustors based on sludge incinerating technology is limited to multiple hearth incinerators only. Over 80 percent of the identified operating sludge incinerators are of the multiple hearth design. About 15 percent are fluidized bed combustors and 3 percent are electric. The remaining combustors co-fire refuse with sludge. Most sludge incinerators are located in the Eastern United States, though there are a significant number on the West Coast. New York has the largest number of facilities with 33. Pennsylvania and Michigan have the next-largest numbers of facilities with 21 and 19 sites, respectively. Sewage sludge incinerator emissions are currently regulated under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart O and 40 CFR Part 61, Subparts C and E. Subpart O in Part 60 establishes a New Source Performance Standard for particulate matter. Subparts C and E of Part 61--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)--establish emission limits for beryllium and mercury, respectively. In 1989, technical standards for the use and disposal of sewage sludge were proposed as 40 CFR Part 503, under authority of Section 405 of the Clean Water Act. Subpart G of this proposed Part 503 proposes to establish national emission limits for arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and total hydrocarbons from sewage sludge incinerators.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Recovery from Sewage Sludge: the Case Study of Croatia
    energies Article Energy Recovery from Sewage Sludge: The Case Study of Croatia Dinko Đurđevi´c 1,* , Paolo Blecich 2 and Željko Juri´c 1 1 Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 April 2019; Accepted: 16 May 2019; Published: 20 May 2019 Abstract: Croatia produced 21,366 tonnes of dry matter (DM) sewage sludge (SS) in 2016, a quantity expected to surpass 100,000 tonnes DM by 2024. Annual production rates for future wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) in Croatia are estimated at 5.8–7.3 Nm3/people equivalent (PE) for biogas and 20–25 kgDM/PE of sewage sludge. Biogas can be converted into 12–16 kWhel/PE of electricity and 19–24 kWhth/PE of heat, which is sufficient for 30–40% of electrical and 80–100% of thermal autonomy. The WWTP autonomy can be increased using energy recovery from sewage sludge incineration by 60% for electricity and 100% of thermal energy (10–13 kWhel/PE and 30–38 kWhth/PE). However, energy for sewage sludge drying exceeds energy recovery, unless solar drying is performed. 2 The annual solar drying potential is estimated between 450–750 kgDM/m of solar drying surface. The lower heating value of dried sewage sludge is 2–3 kWh/kgDM and this energy can be used for assisting sludge drying or for energy generation and supply to WWTPs. Sewage sludge can be considered a renewable energy source and its incineration generates substantially lower greenhouse gases emissions than energy generation from fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture Safe Use of Safe Wastewater in Agriculture Proceedings No
    A UN-Water project with the following members and partners: UNU-INWEH Proceedings of the UN-Water project on the Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture Wastewater Safe of Use Proceedings No. 11 No. Proceedings | UNW-DPC Publication SeriesUNW-DPC Coordinated by the UN-Water Decade Programme on Capacity Development (UNW-DPC) Editors: Jens Liebe, Reza Ardakanian Editors: Jens Liebe, Reza Ardakanian (UNW-DPC) Compiling Assistant: Henrik Bours (UNW-DPC) Graphic Design: Katja Cloud (UNW-DPC) Copy Editor: Lis Mullin Bernhardt (UNW-DPC) Cover Photo: Untited Nations University/UNW-DPC UN-Water Decade Programme on Capacity Development (UNW-DPC) United Nations University UN Campus Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1 53113 Bonn Germany Tel +49-228-815-0652 Fax +49-228-815-0655 www.unwater.unu.edu [email protected] All rights reserved. Publication does not imply endorsement. This publication was printed and bound in Germany on FSC certified paper. Proceedings Series No. 11 Published by UNW-DPC, Bonn, Germany August 2013 © UNW-DPC, 2013 Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the agencies cooperating in this project. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the UN, UNW-DPC or UNU concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise indicated, the ideas and opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily represent the views of their employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sewage (Wastewater) Treatment*
    Sewage (Wastewater) Treatment* Sewage, or wastewater, includes all the water Primary Sewage Treatment from a household that is used for washing and toilet The usual first step in sewage treatment is called wastes. Rainwater flowing into street drains and primary sewage treatment (Figure 2). In this proc- some industrial wastes enter the sewage system in ess, large floating materials in incoming wastewater many cities. Sewage is mostly water and contains are screened out, the sewage is allowed to flow little particulate matter, perhaps only 0.03%. Even so, through settling chambers to remove sand and similar in large cities the solid portion of sewage can total gritty material, skimmers remove floating oil and more than 1000 tons of solid material per day. grease, and floating debris is shredded and ground. Until environmental awareness intensified, a After this step, the sewage passes through sedimenta- surprising number of large American cities had only tion tanks, where more solid matter settles out. Sew- a rudimentary sewage treatment system or no system age solids collecting on the bottom are called at all. Raw sewage, untreated or nearly so, was sim- sludge—at this stage, primary sludge. About 40– ply discharged into rivers or oceans. A flowing, well- 60% of suspended solids are removed from sewage aerated stream is capable of considerable self- by this settling treatment, and flocculating chemicals purification. Therefore, until expanding populations that increase the removal of solids are sometimes and their wastes exceeded this capability, this casual added at this stage. Biological activity is not particu- treatment of municipal wastes did not cause prob- larly important in primary treatment, although some lems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of Urban Stormwater Pollution
    THE CAUSES OF URBAN STORMWATER POLLUTION Some Things To Think About Runoff pollution occurs every time rain or snowmelt flows across the ground and picks up contaminants. It occurs on farms or other agricultural sites, where the water carries away fertilizers, pesticides, and sediment from cropland or pastureland. It occurs during forestry operations (particularly along timber roads), where the water carries away sediment, and the nutrients and other materials associated with that sediment, from land which no longer has enough living vegetation to hold soil in place. This information, however, focuses on runoff pollution from developed areas, which occurs when stormwater carries away a wide variety of contaminants as it runs across rooftops, roads, parking lots, baseball diamonds, construction sites, golf courses, lawns, and other surfaces in our City. The oily sheen on rainwater in roadside gutters is but one common example of urban runoff pollution. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) now considers pollution from all diffuse sources, including urban stormwater pollution, to be the most important source of contamination in our nation's waters. 1 While polluted runoff from agricultural sources may be an even more important source of water pollution than urban runoff, urban runoff is still a critical source of contamination, particularly for waters near cities -- and thus near most people. EPA ranks urban runoff and storm-sewer discharges as the second most prevalent source of water quality impairment in our nation's estuaries, and the fourth most prevalent source of impairment of our lakes. Most of the U.S. population lives in urban and coastal areas where the water resources are highly vulnerable to and are often severely degraded by urban runoff.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Anaerobic Digestion for Municipal Solid Waste
    Global Methane Initiative Overview of Anaerobic Digestion for Municipal Solid Waste Updated: October 2016 1 About This Presentation . Introduces the process of anaerobic digestion (AD) for municipal solid waste (MSW) . Provides an overview of anaerobic digestion microbiology . Helps you understand how you might benefit from AD . Guides you through the key areas to consider when developing an AD project . Reviews the status of AD globally and provides selected case studies Using Bookmarks to Navigate This presentation contains bookmarks to help you navigate. Using the panel on the left, click the bookmark to jump to the slide. For Chrome users, the bookmarks can be viewed by clicking on the bookmark icon ( ) at the top right of the screen. 2 Global Methane Initiative GMI is a voluntary, multilateral partnership that aims to reduce global methane emissions and to advance the abatement, recovery and use of methane as a valuable clean energy source. OBJECTIVES BENEFITS . Reduce anthropogenic methane . Decline in methane concentrations emissions and advance the and methane utilization will result recovery and use of methane in: while: – Sustainability – Enhancing economic growth – Energy security – Promoting energy security – Health and safety – Improving local air quality – Profitability and public health. 3 GMI Partners . Grew from 14 to 42 Partner governments, plus the European Commission . Accounts for nearly 70% of global anthropogenic methane emissions 4 Main Menu 1. Introduction – what is AD and why should it interest me? Click here for an introduction to AD 2. Is AD suitable for me? Click here for more info about the potential for AD 3. Step-by-step guide Click here for detailed information about the key issues to consider when developing an AD project 4.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW of TURBIDITY: Information for Regulators and Water Suppliers
    WHO/FWC/WSH/17.01 WATER QUALITY AND HEALTH - TECHNICAL BRIEF TECHNICAL REVIEW OF TURBIDITY: Information for regulators and water suppliers 1. Summary This technical brief provides information on the uses and significance of turbidity in drinking-water and is intended for regulators and operators of drinking-water supplies. Turbidity is an extremely useful indicator that can yield valuable information quickly, relatively cheaply and on an ongoing basis. Measurement of turbidity is applicable in a variety of settings, from low-resource small systems all the way through to large and sophisticated water treatment plants. Turbidity, which is caused by suspended chemical and biological particles, can have both water safety and aesthetic implications for drinking-water supplies. Turbidity itself does not always represent a direct risk to public health; however, it can indicate the presence of pathogenic microorganisms and be an effective indicator of hazardous events throughout the water supply system, from catchment to point of use. For example, high turbidity in source waters can harbour microbial pathogens, which can be attached to particles and impair disinfection; high turbidity in filtered water can indicate poor removal of pathogens; and an increase in turbidity in distribution systems can indicate sloughing of biofilms and oxide scales or ingress of contaminants through faults such as mains breaks. Turbidity can be easily, accurately and rapidly measured, and is commonly used for operational monitoring of control measures included in water safety plans (WSPs), the recommended approach to managing drinking-water quality in the WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (WHO, 2017). It can be used as a basis for choosing between alternative source waters and for assessing the performance of a number of control measures, including coagulation and clarification, filtration, disinfection and management of distribution systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Failure to Capture and Treat Wastewater
    U.S. OPERATING COPPER MINES: FAILURE TO CAPTURE & TREAT WASTEWATER BY BONNIE GESTRING, MAY 2019 In 2012, Earthworks released a report documenting the failure to capture and treat mine wastewater at U.S. operating copper mines accounting for 89% of U.S. copper production.1 The report found that 92% failed to capture and control mine wastewater, resulting in significant water quality impacts. This is an update to that effort. We reviewed government and industry documents for fifteen operating open-pit copper mines, representing 99% of U.S. copper production in 2015 – the most recent data on copper production available from the U.S. Geological Survey (see Table 1). Our research found similar results: 14 out of 15 (93%) failed to capture and control wastewater, resulting in significant water quality impacts (see TaBle 2). These unauthorized wastewater releases occurred from a number of different sources including uncontrolled seepage from tailings impoundments, waste rock piles, open pits, or other mine facilities, or failure of water treatment facilities, pipeline failures or other accidental releases. TABLE 1: Copper production from top 15 (as of 2015) U.S. open-pit copper mines (most recent data availaBle from USGS).2 MINE PRODUCTION (metric tons) Morenci 481,000 Chino 142,000 Safford 91,600 Bagdad 95,300 Bingham Canyon 92,000 Sierrita 85,700 Ray 75,100 Pinto Valley 60,400 Mission CompleX 68,300 Robinson 56,800 Tyrone 38,100 Continental pit 31,000 PhoeniX 21,100 Miami 19,500 Silver Bell 19,300 Total (99% of U.S. production) 1,377,000 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions from Waste Incineration
    Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories EMISSIONS FROM WASTE INCINERATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This paper was written by Mr. Bernt Johnke (Germany) and reviewed by Robert Hoppaus (IPCC/OECD/IEA), Eugene Lee (US), Bill Irving (USEPA), T. Martinsen (IPCC/OECD/IEA), and K. Mareckova (IPCC/OECD/IEA). ABSTRACT The incineration of municipal waste involves the generation of climate-relevant emissions. These are mainly emissions of CO2 (carbon dioxide) as well as N2O (nitrous oxide), NOx ( oxides of nitrogen) NH3 (ammonia) and organic C, measured as total carbon. CH4 (methane) is not generated in waste incineration during normal operation. It only arises in particular, exceptional, cases and to a small extent (from waste remaining in the waste bunker), so that in quantitative terms CH4 is not to be regarded as climate-relevant. CO2 constitutes the chief climate-relevant emission of waste incineration and is considerably higher, by not less than 102, than the other emissions. Formulas (1) and (2) are to be used for the purpose of compiling an inventory of greenhouse gas emissions, taking the following into account: The incineration of 1 Mg of municipal waste in MSW incinerators is associated with the production/release of about 0.7 to 1.2 Mg of carbon dioxide (CO2 output). The proportion of carbon of biogenic origin is usually in the range of 33 to 50 percent. The climate-relevant CO2 emissions from waste incineration are determined by the proportion of waste whose carbon compounds are assumed to be of fossil origin. The allocation to fossil or biogenic carbon has a crucial influence on the calculated amounts of climate-relevant CO2 emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Illegal Dumping Onto Land Or Into Water
    2. Illegal Dumping Onto Land or Into Water Texas Health & Safety Code Chap 365 Violations Limits to Dumping on Your Own Land Litter Abatement Act From Section 365.012 From Section 365.012 Key Definitions (a) A person commits an offense if the person disposes or allows or permits (l) This section does not apply to an individual's disposal of litter or other solid the disposal of litter or other solid waste at a place that is not an approved waste if: From Section 365.011 solid waste site, including a place on or within 300 feet of a public highway, (1) the litter or waste is generated on land the individual owns; on a right-of-way, on other public or private property, or into inland or coastal (2) the litter or waste is not generated as a result of an activity "Approved solid waste site" means: water of the state. related to a commercial purpose; (A) a solid waste site permitted or registered by the Texas Natural Resource (3) the disposal occurs on land the individual owns; and Conservation Commission; (b) A person commits an offense if the person receives litter or other solid (4) the disposal is not for a commercial purpose. (B) a solid waste site licensed by a county under Chapter 361; or waste for disposal at a place that is not an approved solid waste site, (C) a designated collection area for ultimate disposal at a permitted or regardless of whether the litter or other solid waste or the land on which the Break for Farmers licensed municipal solid waste site.
    [Show full text]
  • Sewage Sludge.01.Qxd
    ash-handling systems and then disposed at landfills. Sludge Incineration Multiple Hearth Furnace Ash from fluidized-bed units is very fine and can be Cost and Technical Feasibility removed with periodic sand changes and continuous Cooling ncineration is a sludge disposal option that Air Discharge scrubbing of the exhaust. Ash disposal is regulated hen considering whether or not to incinerate I involves the firing of sewage sludge at high under solid waste disposal regulations. Beneficial use Wsludge, or which incineration technology to temperatures in an enclosed structure. This process of this ash is actively being investigated. use, cost is always a major consideration. A sludge reduces the sludge to a mass of ash that is less than incinerator is a very mechanized and capital-intensive 20 percent of its original volume. EPA and the states Air Pollution Control Equipment investment that must be managed with a high level of generally support the beneficial use of sludge. Many Sewage expertise and attention to maintenance. Sludge urban sewage treatment facilities produce large Gas Inlet The incineration option is a long-term commitment volumes of sludge and have limited available space Exhaust n general, air pollution control devices are used to for sludge management. They are likely to see I either remove small particles and metals in the that is most cost-effective for large volume wastewater incineration as their most viable option. exhaust gas or to further decompose organics. Devices treatment systems or as a regional solution. In such as wet scrubbers and dry and wet electrostatic evaluating this option, communities must consider Sludge incineration eliminates some environmental precipitators are used to remove metals.
    [Show full text]