Theorizing Pianistic Experience: Tradition, Instrument, Performer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Theorizing Pianistic Experience: Tradition, Instrument, Performer Victoria Tzotzkova Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Victoria Tzotzkova All rights reserved ABSTRACT Theorizing Pianistic Experience: Tradition, Instrument, Performer Victoria Tzotzkova This dissertation theorizes expressive sound in piano performance. It views the act of obtaining a desired sound as an act of subtly adjusting to continually changing conditions of sound production. It takes a performer’s perspective, focusing on the personal experience of sound, as it is being created in performance. Considered on a fine scale, the sound of a piano performance is continually evolving, contingent on the acoustic environment, the characteristics of an instrument, and other circumstantial factors with which a pianist works in performance. Although the focus is on real-time performing experience, in the act of any particular performance, a pianist relies on robust previous experience. This dissertation particularly considers the dynamic, interactive loop of the conception, the making, and the hearing of sound in piano performance. The continued re-enaction of this loop is considered as grounding a specifically pianistic cognitive ability which draws on both the haptic and auditory experience of sound at the piano. My approach to piano playing is rooted in work in critical ethnography as well as theories of cognitive function. These two seemingly disparate areas of enquiry share important common ground in their treatment of conceptualization and experience as mutually definitive. An underlying theme throughout this research is the dynamic interplay between theoretical understanding and lived experience. The focus, however, is consistently on piano playing, seen as the act of engendering artistically charged sound through the interaction with a complex and versatile musical instrument, the acoustics of sound and space, and the expressive possibilities of personal experience. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i List of Figures ii Acknowledgements iii Dedication iv Introduction: Approaching the Topic of Sound in Piano Performance 1 Chapter I: A Living Tradition: Concepts and Practices of Classical Music Piano Performance 11 Chapter II: The Instrument: Physical and Experiential Views on the Piano and Its Sound 57 Chapter III: A Performer at the Piano: Intersecting Physical World and Personal Experience 96 Concluding Remarks: Sound, Pianos, and Experience 167 Bibliography 175 i LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Hammer velocity (V sub-0) and key depressing time (T sub-s) for different values of force (assumed to be constant during the time T sub-s). Reproduced from Fletcher, Neville H. , and Thomas D. Rossing. The Physics of Musical Instruments [in English]. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 1998. 62 Figure 2. Front view of a piano key, marking the area of greatest control over sound quality. Reproduced from personal lesson notebooks with piano pedagogue Rosetta Goodkind, 1991-1995. 84 Figure 3. Two diagrams of the action mechanism for a single piano key. (A) At rest, and (B) during acceleration. Reproduced from Askenfelt, Anders. Five Lectures on the Acoustics of the Piano [in English]. Publications Issued by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music,; No. 64; Variation: Kungl. Musikaliska Akademiens Skriftserie ;; Nr 64. Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music, 1990. 87 ii Figure 4. Opening three measures of Debussy’s Des pas sur la neige. Paris: Durand, 1913. 99 Figure 5. Measures 12-15 of Debussy’s Des pas sur la neige. 105 Figure 6. Measures 12-15 of Debussy’s Des pas sur la neige: The low C in mm. 14-15 is part of two different musical gestures: the two- note rhythmic gestures which recur throughout the piece (boxed in blue), and the three-note chromatic descent which articulates the mid-point of the piece (boxed in red). My drawing. 106 Figure 7. Opening four measures of Debussy’s Ce qu’a vu le vent d’Ouest. Paris: Durand, 1913. 111 Figure 8. Studio setup for Pilot Study 2: Acoustic sound is picked up, routed through the computer, and played back in real-time; output levels of processed sound are kept low throughout. My drawing. 125 Figure 9. Graphic images comparing the sound of the first chord in two performances of Morton Feldman’s Last Pieces. Even for chords chosen for maximal similarity in voicing (relative dynamic level between the notes comprising the chord) and overall dynamic level, both the sine wave representation (A and B) and the spectral iii profile representation (A1 and B1) show detectable differences. My diagrams. 128 Figure 10. Decay patterns for different partials of a complex sound triggered by playing the lowest C (f = 32.7) on a grand piano. Reproduced from Fletcher, Neville H., E. D. Blackham, and R. Stratton. "Quality of Piano Tones." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34 (1962): 749-61. 137 Figure 11. A cyclical diagram of the processes involved in zvukoizvlechenie. The diagram represents the continual feed-back between the conception, realization, and hearing of sound in the act of piano playing. My drawing. 155 Figure 12. Ulric Neisser’s “perceptual cycles,” modeling perception as a dynamic, exploratory act. Reproduced from Neisser, Ulric. Cognition and Reality : Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology [in English]. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1976. 158 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have been involved in the process of this dissertation work and have contributed to it at different stages and in different ways. First of all, I would like to thank my principal advisor, Professor George Lewis for his support throughout the process. I would also like to thank the internal members of my dissertation committee, Professor Brad Garton for his warm support of a key project at the Computer Music Center, and Professor Ellie Hisama for her insightful guidance at important junctures. My work has also benefitted from the continual involvement of Professor Joseph Dubiel, with whom I started work on this research, as well as Professor Lydia Goehr, Professor Boris Gasparov, Professor Marion Guck, Professor Mark Graham, Professor David Cohen, Professor Ellen Gray. My gratitude to friends and colleagues for insight, support, and involvement at different stages, especially to Marlon Feld, Ashley Nail, AJ Johnson, Carl Bettendorf, Olaf Post, Marie-Christine Nizzi, Sampo Haapamaki, Cathy Cox, Lisa Margulis, Smaranda Muresan. I would also like to thank Gabriela Kumar for her unfailing support with all logistical matters. Heartfelt gratitude to my family for their unconditional support and love. v DEDICATION To the memory of my principal teacher Ms. Rosetta Goodkind (1917-2011) who opened up worlds of experience for me vi 1 INTRODUCTION: APPROACHING THE TOPIC OF SOUND IN PIANO PERFORMANCE Sound and Act This dissertation views piano playing as an accomplished cognitive ability. It explores a particular approach to piano playing, which is focused on sound. The goal of the research is to offer a multi-faceted and distinctly nuanced account of the act of artistic piano playing. The main focus is on how pianists achieve a rich variety of artistically charged sound qualities during a performance. While this focus on sound is clearly not characteristic of all available approaches to artistic piano playing, it is a definitive characteristic of a significant body of experiential accounts by eminent figures in the world of piano performance, performers and pedagogues alike.1 This focus brings about some significant questions and requires some fundamental shifts in habitual modes of describing not only piano performance but also musical sound. One of the fundamental themes of this research is the relation of sound and experience. Throughout this work, sound and experience are treated as essentially inextricably intertwined aspects of a continual, dynamic interaction. When addressing possibilities of sound quality (e.g. mournful, shrill, pastoral, grandiose, hushed, singing, etc.), experience has to be taken into account. The possibilities for variations in sound 1 Some figures discussed at different points in this work include Heinrich Neuhaus, Walter Gieseking, Joseph Hofmann, Catherine Goodson, Alfred Brendel, Charles Rosen, Philip Lasser. 2 quality during performance cannot be exhaustively addressed apart from the experience of a person engaged with the sound. Artistically charged sound emerges in a personal interaction with sound in performance. My research into piano performance, with its focus on the ability to draw out a rich variety of sound qualities, is fundamentally indebted to theoretical work in cognition that treats cognitive function as a dynamic, interactive process. Such work approaches existence in general in terms of tight-knit, dynamic interactions between an organism and its environment. Enaction, a theory developed by a team of researchers headed by Francisco Varela in the 1980s, describes cognition as a continually dynamic process in which an organism explores as well as acts on different features of its surroundings2. This theory circumvents the notion of describing an organism itself or the environment itself, as well as the problem of determining which aspects of experience belong on which side of such a split. Instead, the theory focuses on the organism’s active being in its environment, offering a dynamic vision of existence. Enaction proposes a view of existence in terms of experience, and treats experience as continually active dynamic process. I concentrate on sound from a performer’s position, from the position of a person actively interacting with sound and the instrument, which presents particular possibilities for bringing the sound into being. Playing music at the piano is treated as a non-replicable act, an act during which a pianist is continually engaged in multi-layered “negotiations” with both the instrument and the sound as it is being made in each unique moment and 2 A key text articulating the theory of enaction is Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch, The Embodied Mind : Cognitive Science and Human Experience (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1991).