Influence of Seasonal Weather Variations on Fuel Status for Some Shrubs Typical of Mediterranean Basin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
P1.16 INFLUENCE OF SEASONAL WEATHER VARIATIONS ON FUEL STATUS FOR SOME SHRUBS TYPICAL OF MEDITERRANEAN BASIN Grazia Pellizzaro1*, Andrea Ventura1, Pierpaolo Zara1 1CNR – IBIMET, Institute of Biometeorology, Sassari, Italy 1. INTRODUCTION Therefore, the knowledge of seasonal variation of ignitability and vegetation moisture The term flammability refers to the ability of content could contribute to identify critical a particular fuel to ignite and sustain fire. periods of high fire risk in Mediterranean maquis Although there is not an accepted standard for ecosystems. flammability vegetation measurement, most The main objectives of this work were (i) to methods are based on measuring the “ignition describe the seasonal pattern of live fine fuel delay time” (ID time) or time to ignition, which is moisture content (LFMC) and ignitability values the time required for the fuel to start ignition in for some Mediterranean shrubs, and (ii) to presence of a constant heat source (Trabaud, evaluate the influence of weather seasonality, on 1976; Valette, 1990; Dimitrakopoulos and LFMC variation. Papaioannou, 2001). Ignitability of living vegetation is influenced by several factors 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS including structural properties, chemical properties and moisture content. The moisture The study was carried out in a natural content of living plant is a critical parameter reserve located in North Western Sardinia, Italy affecting fire ignition (Van Wagner, 1977; (40° 36’ N; 8° 09’ E, 30 m a.s.l.). The climate is Chandler et al., 1983; Carlson and Burgan, Mediterranean with a water deficit from May 2003). Depending on the moisture content, through September and precipitation mainly living vegetation may act as a heat source or a concentrated in autumn and winter. The mean heat sink, either contributing to the energy of fire annual rainfall is 640 mm and the mean annual or retarding fire propagation and intensity (Pyne air temperature is 16.8 °C. The soils are Luvi et al., 1996; Ralph and Nelson, 2001). and Litosoils, neutral, with depth rarely Evergreen sclerophyll shrubland is a exceeding 0.2-0.3 m. The study area is covered prominent feature of Mediterranean Basin. by Mediterranean maquis and gariga, developed Moreover, Mediterranean shrub species are an after a fire event occurred in middle 1970s. A important component of the understorey detailed site vegetation description has been vegetation that constitutes the surface fuels reported in previous works (Pellizzaro et al., primarily responsible for the ignition and the 2003). spread of wildland fires in Mediterranean forests ID time and LFMC were measured from (Dimitrakopoulos and Bemmerzouk, 2003). In October 2003 to October 2004, monthly or bi- Mediterranean areas, where climate is monthly, on four dominant species of the study characterized by variable winter precipitation area that are very common in the Western and prolonged summer drought, vegetation has Mediterranean Basin: Cistus monspeliensis L., flammable structure and chemistry that allow live Phillyrea angustifolia L., Pistacia lentiscus L., fuels to propagate wildfire. Moreover, a and Rosmarinus officinalis L. decrease in vegetation moisture, due to a Samples of live fine fuel, consisting of seasonal decrease of soil water availability, can terminal portions of twigs were collected from determine severe fire danger when combined outer crown. Phenological observations were with high meteorological risk (i.e. strong summer made at the moment of sampling. Ignitability wind) (Dennison et al., 2003). test was performed using a standard epiradiator of 500 W constant nominal power with a pilot *Corresponding author address: flame located 0.04 m above the center of the Grazia Pellizzaro, CNR-IBIMET, Institute of disk, according to the methodology described by Biometeorology, Sassari. Via Funtana di Lu Valette (1990). For each species, a total of 45 Colbu 4/A, 07100 Sassari, ITALY; samples were prepared. According to the e-mail: [email protected] method proposed by Valette (1990), species were classified as low or moderately flammable Hernando Lara et al., 1994; Dimitrakopoulos and when ID time values were higher than 27 s, as Papaioannou, 2001). Water must be vaporized flammable when ID time values ranged between before the fuel can be ignited, so that higher 17 and 26, and very or extremely flammable moisture content means a higher quantity of when ID time values were smaller than 17 s. heat needed to reach the temperature of ignition Moreover, four samples of 5 grams were (Pyne et al. 1996). dried in a oven for 24 hours at 104 °C to determine live fine fuel moisture content (LFMC) Table 1 – Regression statistics of ID time versus for each species. LFMC was expressed as LFMC. Regression model percentage of dry weight. During the whole period of experimentation, y = α + βx meteorological variables were recorded by an Species α β R2 Sign. automatic weather station located in the study site, and the soil moisture content at 0.2 m deep Cistus monspeliensis 8.70 0.09 0.73 ** was monitored by TDR probes (Campbell, CS Rosmarinus officinalis 5.61 0.13 0.85 *** 615). Cumulated values of the daily precipitation Phillyrea angustifolia 1.52 0.17 0.72 ** over different periods before sampling date (15, Pistacia lentiscus 1.78 0.20 0.94 *** 30, 60, and 90 days) were calculated. In * p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤0.01; ***p ≤0.001 addition, a Canopy Drought Stress Index (CDSI) (Baldocchi, 1997) was calculated. CDSI is defined as the ratio between the cumulative Although the seasonal behavior of time to precipitation (ΣP) and cumulative reference ignition was very close to that one observed for evapotranspiration (ΣETo) over a period of time. fuel moisture content for all the studied species, ETo was estimated using the Hargreaves the seasonal trend and the range of LFMC and equation (1975). ID time values were very different. The results of the ignitability test were Cistus and Rosmarinus showed the highest subjected to regression analysis in order to seasonal variability on LFMC and ID time describe for each species the relations between (Fig 1). The lower LFMC and ID time values time to ignition and seasonal variation of fuel were recorded in summer, whereas a clear moisture content. A one way ANOVAs with increase of values was observed in autumn measured plant parameters (LFMC and ID time) when rainfall occurred. The highest LFMC and as dependent variable, and date of sampling as ID time values were observed in winter and independent factor, was performed to test the spring. Cistus and Rosmarinus LFMC values effect of season. Finally, correlation analysis were highly correlated with ΣP or CDSI when was performed in order to test the significance of period of 15, 30 or 60 days before sampling linear relationships between (i) LFMC and ΣP or were considered (table 2). Significant CDSI, calculated over different period before correlations were also observed between LFMC sampling; (ii) between LFMC and soil moisture and soil moisture content values or mean value content values and (iii) between LFMC and the of maximum air temperature calculated over 10 mean value of daily maximum air temperature days before sampling (table 3). Pistacia calculated over 10 days before sampling. lentiscus and Phillyrea angustifolia showed low LFMC and ID time seasonal variability (Fig. 1). 3. RESULTS and DISCUSSION These species showed values of LFMC and ID time almost constant during the cold period, Highly significant relations between LFMC whereas small decreases were observed in late and time to ignition were observed for all species summer. In late spring an increase of LFMC and the moisture content variation accounted for values was observed for Phillyrea angustifolia most of the variance in the time to ignition values when the plants were in resprouting phase. (table 1). These results confirm what other authors reported about the relationship between live fine fuel moisture and ignitability in Mediterranean species (Trabaud, 1976; Bunting et al., 1983; 300 45 b Cistus monspeliensis 40 Cistus monspeliensis 250 b c ce 35 a ) 200 30 e (s ) ac ac ac (% 25 150 me cd MC a ti 20 d ID LF 100 15 d d d 10 50 ad 5 300 45 l t 3 c b y n l t 4 3 c b y Ronsmariunus ofpficina4lis 40 0 e e a Rosmu arinuJu s opfficinalis0 0 e e a u J e 0 t_ D F M J e t_ 250 t_ D F M J S t_ c S c c O b O Oc Oc 35 ) ab ) ab 200 bc 30 a be e (s (% ac 25 c 150 me ae ae i MC c t 20 ID LF 100 a 15 d d 10 50 5 300 45 l 3 c y l t 4 3 c b y Phnillyrea angustt ifoli4a 40 0 e b a Phnillyreua angpustifo0lia 0 e e a u Ju p 0 _ e Ju J e _ 250 _ D F M J e _ t D F M S t ct S ct c c O O 35O O ) 200 (s ) 30 % ( 25 150 me ti a MC c 20 ab ab a ab a a bc ab bd ad ab ID bc LF 100 e 15 c 10 50 5 300 45 l t 3 c b y n l t 4 3 c b y Pisn taciau lentiscp us4 40 0 e e a uPistacJuia lentiscusp 0 0 e e a u J e 0 t_ D F M J e t_ 250 t_ D F M J S t_ c S c c O O Oc O 35 ) 200 30 a (% 25 ab ab ab 150 b me (s ) ab b b ab ti b MC ab ab ac ac c ac 20 ID LF 100 15 10 50 5 0 0 l t 3 c b y n l t 4 3 c b y n u p 4 0 e e a u Ju p 0 0 e e a u J e 0 t_ D F M J e t_ t_ D F M J t_ c S c c S O O O Oc Figure 1.