DOCSLIB.ORG

EXTRACT from the WARRANT BOOKS of the PAYMASTER GENERAL Quebec 1 January 1780 Final Warrant to Captain Walter Butler Being an Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EXTRACT from the WARRANT BOOKS of the PAYMASTER GENERAL Quebec 1 January 1780 Final Warrant to Captain Walter Butler Being an Al EXTRACT FROM THE WARRANT BOOKS OF THE PAYMASTER GENERAL Quebec 1 January 1780 Final Warrant to Captain Walter Butler being an allowance made to the Corps of Rangers under the command of Major John Butler for the year 1778 and is in consideration of the great fatigues and being subject from the nature of the service to many losses which the remoteness of their situation renders very expensive .................................................................................................................... £469 5 0 _________________________ British Library. Sloane and Additional Manuscripts, Add MSS 21754, Abstract of Warrants for the Extraordinary Service of the Army, 1778-1784; National Archives of Canada, Haldimand Collection, microfilm reel A-678. ************************* GENERAL FREDERICK HALDIMAND TO LORD GEORGE GERMAIN Quebec 26 January 1780 In the case of Colonel Johnson, I must assure Your Lordship that I have not the least reason, nor do I by any means wish to hurt him, yet I think it indispensably my duty to acquaint you that he is not possessed of either abilities, temper, or the necessary talents to conduct a department of such importance as he is at the head of, and if His Majesty should think proper to annex a high rank to that employment, Mr Johnson is in every respect, but particularly as an Officer, a very unfit person to be entrusted with the power it will give him. In some of his letters to me and by his declarations, I find he takes to himself a great share of the merit of the conduct which has been observed by the Five Nations in the present conduct, which in fact he has not the smallest claim to any part of, having left his duty in '75 (when the Province was invaded) instead of remaining in the Indian Country where his presence was at that period indispensably necessary. By which, his Department was thrown into the last confusion, from which it was secured by the unwearied attention, application and judicious conduct of Major Butler, his Deputy, who returned from Quebec to Niagara for that purpose and who so far from being in any shape assisted by Colonel Johnson, never heard from him until July '77. So to Major Butler, with the aid of the late Colonel Caldwell and the Officers who succeeded him in the command at Niagara, together with the activity of Joseph Brant, whatever has been accomplished with and by the Five Nations is entirely due. _________________________ National Archives of Canada. Colonial Office Records, Q 17-1. * Comment: Haldimand is referring to Colonel Guy Johnson, not Sir John Johnson. ********************* MAJOR GENERAL PHILIP SCHUYLER TO COLONEL GUY JOHNSON Albany 7 January 1780 Your dispatch of the 7th December last was delivered to me this morning. The address as far as it concerns myself I should have considered with perfect indifference to the sovereign authority of the United States whose offices I have the honour to be. It is disrespectful and nothing but the cause of humanity could have justified me in breaking the seal. The Indians who have made war on these States in violation of their most solemn treaties are very far from deserving the encomiums you hazard in their favour. They have not, it is true, destroyed or carried away all the inhabitants who have had the misfortune to fall into their hands, but that after the unexampled ravages and barbarities they have without provocation perpetrated an Officer in high confidence of what you are pleased to term a generous nation should speak of the clemency and tenderness of those Indians, is not a little surprising. You will pardon a reflection which you have drawn forth by awakening a sense of calamities never to be remembered without horrors. I do not mean to enter into altercation. On what principle it is that the Indians expect equivalent for any of the citizens of those States whom they did not carry into captivity, I am ignorant; and you have not been pleased to explain some of the unhappy sufferers at Cherry Valley were left there by the Commanding Officers of the party who burned that village and an equivalent was afterwards claimed for them by Captain Butler in your Service. Such a claim would not have been supported on any principle whatever unused to favour and clemency from an enemy. The Officer Commanding in this Department did not avail himself of the obvious objectives to their claim, but as I am informed, complied with it on the first application an equal number of persons residing here and whose relations had removed to Canada permission to retire thither. Many have availed themselves of the indulgence, and others who set out late in the season on their journey were retarded only by the severity of the weather. The Indians expect, nevertheless, that their people should be restored to them as a condition of their continuing humanity towards their prisoners which you seem to think they have generally exercised. You, Sir, will do well to put them in mind of the treatment the Mohawks received at our hands when they were seized near Lake George in the very act of joining what were once your Army. Let them also be reminded that the same lenity and forbearance have been experienced by such of the Senecas, Cayugas and Onondagas as were in our power, and that we have even permitted the Cayugas, to whom you particularly refer, to proceed as far as Oneida, in the prospect that the exchange I had proposed in my last letter to Colonel Butler would have been accomplished. This is a lesson which should have taught them for the honour of the Nation for whose generosity you are an advocate and for the sake of that humanity which you seem to approve. While they act under your superintendence, every private and national consideration calls upon you to inculcate principles of humanity and to restrain them from cruelties to prisoners. It is not from any dread of their poser that these suggestions are dictated. The barbarities they may commit upon individuals will be deplored and condemned by all mankind, and they accent proof that the just resentments of an injured people can reach the most corners of their wilderness. Mrs Butler will be permitted to proceed to Canada with her family whenever proper assurances are given that Mrs Campbell and hers will have the like indulgence. Two of Mrs Mcdonell's and Mrs Fraser have solicited to return to New York or Canada with their families. Their wishes will be complied with whenever I am advised that the families who have been carried into captivity from these States will be liberated. ______________________ United States. Papers of the Continental Congress, Microfilm Group M247, Roll 173:499-502. * Comment: This is also in the Haldimand Papers, Add MSS 21779, but the date given is 23 January 1780. ********************** CAPTAIN WALTER BUTLER TO CAPTAIN ROBERT MATHEWS Montreal 2 February 1780 I return you my thanks for your kind favour and must express my gratitude to His Excellency for his attention to the release of my father's family. Give me leave to add that as the General has expressed a desire to serve me, I must likewise acknowledge the obligation I am under to him, therefore, and will wait for his commands in anything he will please to point out for me. I mentioned Captain McDonell the distress of several men having families (whom I discharged last spring as having too large families) for the want of provisions; likewise that several men still in the Rangers as having families were sent down from Niagara in order to ease the garrison in the articles of provision. Flour is so high a price that they can't afford to purchase it. I have a man of the name of Pencil, who served formerly in the Royal Americans. He has an old mother who is upwards of seventy, who he is obliged to attend constantly. He says if he was allowed a little provision for her, he could make out to save as much from his pay would pay for some family taking charge of her; but otherwise he will be lost to the Service. He is a man of good character and very fit for the service he is in. Pray, when will the express go off for Niagara? If the General thinks proper, had not Captain Dame best be sent? He expresses a desire to go and for my part I think it would be the best thing he could do. I have paid a good deal of money for him, but must stop my hand for a while. I am with my respects to Captain Pearke. _________________________ British Library. Sloane and Additional Manuscripts, Add MSS 21765, Correspondence with Officers at Niagara, 1777-1784; National Archives of Canada, Haldimand Collection, microfilm reel number A-682. ************************* FREDERICK MACKENZIE, DEPUTY ADJUTANT GENERAL, TO SIR HENRY CLINTON New York 4 February 1780 General Tryon desires you will be so good as to order provisions to be issued to Mr Jacob Kemble of Colonel Butler's Rangers with other people of that Corps. _________________________ National Archives of Canada. American Manuscripts in the Royal Institute of Great Britain, British Headquarters Papers. Document 2556. EXTRACT: CAPTAIN ROBERT MATHEWS TO CAPTAIN MCALPIN Quebec 7 February 1780 Captain Butler, having represented to His Excellency the distress which several men late of Major Butler's Corps labour under for want of provisions, who were discharged and sent from Niagara to lessen the consumption of provisions at that place, having large families, who are now at Montreal, and likewise the case of one Pencil, a Ranger whose mother is helpless, upwards of seventy years old, not being able to abandon her, he requests she may be allowed a little provision, which would enable him to place her in some family where she might be taken care of, that he may return to his duty, His Excellency desires you will make enquiry into these matters and afford them such assistance as they stand in need of, upon the same footing as other Loyalists.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edward Wall, a Loyalist in Conflict by Peter C
    Edward Wall, a loyalist in Conflict by Peter C. Betz 178 Noonan Road, Fort Johnson, N.Y. 12070 . Tne author WQufd like to acknowledge. tlze res~~tth fLSSistan~e Of . Mt. Gavin K. Watt, PresUient of the Museum of Applied Milit4ry Mr. Peter C. Betz, a History alU/Lt. Col. William Smy, no,ted Butler's :Rtmgers authority, · native of ...bf>tlz of whom provided information not locally available, as well as Amsterdam . e_<!itorial and very patient cmnputer assistance provided by.Mr. Micha.el NY, grew Johnson. · . .. .. · .. .. up in the Mohawk Th~ - author aL<.Jo wishes to ack~owledge the influence of the late Col Valley, · Charles B, Briggs, past Superintendent ofJohnson Hall State Historic received his Site) who iii the J960's and early 70's was the first area historimi to · BA in acknowledge; research and lecture on the livf!"s, hard~hips and English and History sacrifices of the Loyalist.<;. from the University tic assertions dating back no further than tcr-as-tyrant, a characterization, no doubt of Vermont the writings of factually-liberal nine­ sometimes correct in Simms' own era. in 1965 and his Masters teenth century Ameri c<in historians such But on what primary documentation ol Library as Jcptha R. Simms, w ho in his 1882 Simms claims any authority for applying and Information Science at SUNY, Albany in opus, Frontiersmen of New York de­ this later stereotype to Edw<1rd Wall he 1966. Always interested in New York State scribes Wall as the first man to "use the does not say, si mply because there i s history, he wrote a weekly local history birch", and tells us that, "Wall was a se­ none.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Magazine
    THE WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Volume 56 January 1973 Number 1 THE PREVOSTS OF THE ROYAL AMERICANS Edward G. Williams peldom in recorded history has there been a group of people who O surpassed in adaptability the Swiss soldiers who entered the Britisharmy in the middle of the eighteenth century expressly to serve in America against the French. Among the company of officers there stands out a family of three brothers and one nephew, all of whom were exceptional in every phase of military life and personal conduct. The brothers Prevost (pronounced Prevo) left an imprint upon the annals of the British army that would be the envy of many a family historian, and nowhere does greater interest attach to their activities than in Pennsylvania west of the Susquehanna River. In fact, there are few parts of western Europe and fewer sections of the English- speaking colonies on this side of the Atlantic Ocean where interest does not attach to their mutifaceted affairs. Ubiquity was the one attribute common to the whole group, and cosmopolitanism, linked with urbanity, was the prime quality that characterized them all. In words of modern expression, "they got around" and "they belonged" in whatever locality, situation, or society they found themselves. Certain members of the family crossed and re- crossed the ocean almost as though modern air travel existed. Two of the Prevosts married American wives, which focused upon the hus- bands an ephemeral kind of fame. Along with Henry Bouquet and Frederick Haldimand, each of the Prevosts placed his individual imprint upon the memorial records of the Royal American Regiment, the King's Royal Rifle Corps of the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • American Revolution End Notes
    American Revolution End Notes 1 This article was written by Frank J Rafalko, Chief 12 Letter from George Washington to Governor Jonathan Community Training Branch, National Trumball, November 15, 1775 in which Washington Counterintelligence Center inserted the resolve of Congress he received from John Hancock regarding Church 2 Thomas Hutchinson came from a prominent New England family In 1737, despite his familys 13 This article was written by Frank J Rafalko, Chief, admonishment to him about going into politics, he was Community Training Branch, National elected to the Massachusetts House of Representative Counterintelligence Center He later served as Chief Justice of the colony and then royal governor 14 Col Jacobus Swartwout (d1826), commander of the 3 Francis Bernard was the nephew of Lord Barrington, 2d Dutchess County Regiment of Minute Men the secretary of state for war in London Barrington arranged for Bernard to be appointed as royal governor 15 Johnathan Fowler of New Jersey, but after two years Bernard move to Massachusetts to become royal governor there He was 16 James Kip recalled to London in 1769 17 This article was written by Dan Lovelace, National 4 Dr Benjamin Church Counterintelligence Center 5 AJ Langguth, Patriots The Men Who Started the 18 Carl Van Dorens description of Benedict Arnold in his American Revolution, Simon and Schuster, New York, Secret History of the American Revolution 1988, p 311 19 This article is copyrighted by Eric Evans Rafalko and 6 Edmund R Thompson, ed, Secret New England Spies used with his
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Sides: Political and Social Divisions in the Niagara Area from 1780 to 1845
    1 Taking sides: political and social divisions in the Niagara area from 1780 to 1845. Sir William Johnson John Johnson It began with Sir William Johnsonʼs favoritism. Johnson came from Ireland to run the large estate of his Uncle, Admiral Warren, in the Mohawk Valley. He was given an army command in the French and Indian War and credited with winning the Battle of Lake George in 1755 and the Battle of Fort Niagara in 1759. He was made Superintendent of Indian Affairs and had many children by Iroquois ladies and some with Europeans. He had his son John and his two daughters by an indentured servant, a German girl; one daughter married his nephew Guy Johnson and the other married Daniel Claus. John Johnson, sent to England to refine him, to wear off the rustic edges of a frontiersman, was made a baronet by King George III who admired his fatherʼs accomplishments. Sir William Johnsonʼs longest attachment was to Molly Brant by whom he had eight children. Mollyʼs brother Joseph, was part of Sir Williamʼs household from time to time and well known to the Johnson clan and to the Butlers. Sir William Johnson, however, depended upon a neighbor in the Mohawk Valley John Butler as an aide in the Indian Department and also in the battles with the French when Butler was his second in command. Butler, the son of the army commander at Fort Hunter where the Mohawk and Schoharie Rivers meet, spoke Indian languages and 2 knew Indian customs well. Of his children, the most famous or notorious to Americans for his escapades in the Revolutionary War was Walter, a charismatic historical figure.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders of George Washington to General John Sullivan, at Head-Quarters May 31, 1779
    Orders of George Washington to General John Sullivan, at Head-Quarters May 31, 1779 The Expedition you are appointed to command is to be directed against the hostile tribes of the Six Nations of Indians, with their associates and adherents. The immediate objects are the total destruction and devastation of their settlements, and the capture of as many prisoners of every age and sex as possible. It will be essential to ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more. I would recommend, that some post in the center of the Indian Country, should be occupied with all expedition, with a sufficient quantity of provisions whence parties should be detached to lay waste all the settlements around, with instructions to do it in the most effectual manner, that the country may not be merely overrun, but destroyed. But you will not by any means listen to any overture of peace before the total ruinment of their settlements is effected. Our future security will be in their inability to injure us and in the terror with which the severity of the chastisement they receive will inspire them.[4] The 1779 Sullivan Campaign A Little-Known Offensive Strategic To The War Breaks The Indian Nations' Power by Stanley J. Adamiak The 1779 Sullivan Campaign emerged as one of the larger of the Continental Army's offensives during the American Revolution, yet remains relatively unknown.1 It was an act of reprisal to break the Iroquois Confederation, a Native American political and military alliance that included the Seneca, Cayuga, Mohawk, Onondaga, 0neida, and Tuscarora tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2021 "Savage and Bloody Footsteps Through the Valley" : The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination William R. Tharp Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/6707 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Savage and Bloody Footsteps Through the Valley” The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Virginia Commonwealth University By. William R. Tharp Dr. Carolyn Eastman, Advisor Associate Professor, Department of History Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia 14 May 2021 Tharp 1 © William R. Tharp 2021 All Rights Reserved Tharp 2 Abstract Along the banks of the Susquehanna River in early July 1778, a force of about 600 Loyalist and Native American raiders won a lopsided victory against 400 overwhelmed Patriot militiamen and regulars in the Wyoming Valley of Pennsylvania. While not well-known today, this battle—the Battle of Wyoming—had profound effects on the Revolutionary War and American culture and politics. Quite familiar to early Americans, this battle’s remembrance influenced the formation of national identity and informed Americans’ perceptions of their past and present over the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Canada, New York, and the Iroquois Six Nations, 1783-1815 Author(S): Alan Taylor Reviewed Work(S): Source: Journal of the Early Republic, Vol
    Society for Historians of the Early American Republic The Divided Ground: Upper Canada, New York, and the Iroquois Six Nations, 1783-1815 Author(s): Alan Taylor Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Spring, 2002), pp. 55-75 Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press on behalf of the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3124858 . Accessed: 02/11/2011 18:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Pennsylvania Press and Society for Historians of the Early American Republic are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Early Republic. http://www.jstor.org THE DIVIDED GROUND: UPPER CANADA, NEW YORK, AND THE IROQUOIS SIX NATIONS, 1783-1815 AlanTaylor In recentyears, historians have paid increasing attention to bordersand borderlandsas fluidsites of bothnational formation and local contestation. At theirperipheries, nations and empires assert their power and define their identitywith no certainty of success.Nation-making and border-making are inseparablyintertwined. Nations and empires, however, often reap defiance frompeoples uneasily bisected by theimposed boundaries. This process of border-making(and border-defiance)has been especiallytangled in the Americaswhere empires and republicsprojected their ambitions onto a geographyoccupied and defined by Indians.Imperial or nationalvisions ran up against the tangled complexities of interdependentpeoples, both native and invader.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Perspectives on Its Purpose from Published Accounts Preston E
    SOME PERSPECTIVES ON ITS PURPOSE FROM PUBLISHED ACCOUNTS PRESTON E. PIERCE ONTARIO COUNTY HISTORIAN DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS, ARCHIVES AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ERVICES CANANDAIGUA, NEW YORK 2019 (REPRINTED, UPDATED, AND REVISED 2005, 1985) 1 Front cover image: Sullivan monument erected at the entrance to City Pier on Lake Shore Drive, Canandaigua. Sullivan-Clinton Sesquicentennial Commission, 1929. Bronze tablet was a common feature of all monuments erected by the Commission. Image from original postcard negative, circa 1929, in possession of the author. Above: Sullivan-Clinton Sesquicentennial Commission tablet erected at Kashong (Yates County), Rt. 14, south of Geneva near the Ontario County boundary. 1929. Image by the author. 2004 2 Gen. John Sullivan. Image from Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Revolution. v. I. 1860. p. 272. 3 Sullivan-Clinton Campaign monument (front and back) erected in 1929 in Honeoye. Moved several times, it commemorates the location of Ft. Cummings, a temporary base established by Sullivan as he began the final leg of his march to the Genesee River. Images by the author. Forward 4 1979 marked the 200th anniversary of the Sullivan-Clinton expedition against those Iroquois nations that allied themselves with Britain and the Loyalists during the American Revolution. It is a little-understood (more often misunderstood) military incursion with diplomatic, economic, and decided geo-political consequences. Unfortunately, most people, including most municipal historians, know little about the expedition beyond what is recorded on roadside markers. In 1929, during the sesquicentennial celebrations of the American Revolution, the states of New York and Pennsylvania established a special commission that produced a booklet, sponsored local pageants, and erected many commemorative tablets in both states.
    [Show full text]
  • Alden T Vaughan FRONTIER BANDITTI and the INDIANS: THE
    Alden T Vaughan COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY FRONTIER BANDITTI AND THE INDIANS: THE PAXTON BOYS' LEGACY, 1763-1775 QN September 13, 1766, Secretary of State for the Southern 0 }Department, Lord Shelburne, addressed a circular letter to the governors of Britain's North American colonies. "His Majesty's Super- intendents for Indian Affairs," he wrote with evident consternation, report "that the most unprovoked violences and Murthers have lately been committed on the Indians . .. whose Tribes are at present in Peace and Amity with His Majesty's Provinces, and that the offenders have not yet been discovered and brought to Justice." The danger was imminent and immense. In conjunction with frequent encroachments on Indian lands and sharp practices by colonists engaged in the Indian trade, recent crimes against friendly Indians threatened to embroil British America in a massive Indian war. Through Shelburne's letter, King George commanded his governors "to remedy and prevent those Evils, which are as contrary to the Rules of good Policy as of Justice and Equity."' Pennsylvania was one of the most culpable colonies.2 Until the 1750s, William Penn's American province had enjoyed unparalleled peace with its Indian inhabitants; when abuses of Indians occasionally occurred, colonial authorities had generally administered impartial justice.3 That idyllic picture changed dramatically in the mid 1750s. The French and Indian War brought several years of frontier carnage that returned, after a brief lapse, during Pontiac's uprising of 1763. Although peace was soon restored, interracial harmony was not. Frontier frustrations and racial antagonism reached a symbolic climax in December 1763 when a band of Lancaster County ruffians slaugh- tered twenty friendly Indians and attempted, several weeks later, to I 2 PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY wreak the same vigilante violence on 140 Christian Indians sheltered in Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • Oriskany:Aplace of Great Sadness Amohawk Valley Battelfield Ethnography
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Ethnography Program Northeast Region ORISKANY:APLACE OF GREAT SADNESS AMOHAWK VALLEY BATTELFIELD ETHNOGRAPHY FORT STANWIX NATIONAL MONUMENT SPECIAL ETHNOGRAPHIC REPORT ORISKANY: A PLACE OF GREAT SADNESS A Mohawk Valley Battlefield Ethnography by Joy Bilharz, Ph.D. With assistance from Trish Rae Fort Stanwix National Monument Special Ethnographic Report Northeast Region Ethnography Program National Park Service Boston, MA February 2009 The title of this report was provided by a Mohawk elder during an interview conducted for this project. It is used because it so eloquently summarizes the feelings of all the Indians consulted. Cover Photo: View of Oriskany Battlefield with the 1884 monument to the rebels and their allies. 1996. Photograph by Joy Bilharz. ExEcuTivE SuMMARy The Mohawk Valley Battlefield Ethnography Project was designed to document the relationships between contemporary Indian peoples and the events that occurred in central New York during the mid to late eighteenth century. The particular focus was Fort Stanwix, located near the Oneida Carry, which linked the Mohawk and St. Lawrence Rivers via Wood Creek, and the Oriskany Battlefield. Because of its strategic location, Fort Stanwix was the site of several critical treaties between the British and the Iroquois and, following the American Revolution, between the latter and the United States. This region was the homeland of the Six Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy whose neutrality or military support was desired by both the British and the rebels during the Revolution. The Battle of Oriskany, 6 August 1777, occurred as the Tryon County militia, aided by Oneida warriors, was marching to relieve the British siege of Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSSA Bulletin 131-132 2017-2018
    David R. Starbuck, Editor ISSN 1046-2368 The New York State Archaeological Association2018 Officers Lisa Marie Anselmi, President David Moyer, Vice President Gail Merian, Secretary Ann Morton, Treasurer The views expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the publisher. Published by the New York State Archaeological Association. Subscription by membership in NYSAA. For membership information write: President Lisa Anselmi, [email protected]; 716 878-6520 Back numbers may be obtained from [email protected]; 716 878-6520 Or downloaded from the NYSAA website http://nysarchaeology.org/nysaa/ Entire articles or excerpts may be reprinted upon notification to the NYSAA. Manuscripts should be submitted to Dr. David Starbuck, P.O. Box 492, Chestertown, NY 12817. If you are thinking of submitting an item for publication, please note that manuscripts will be returned for correction if manuscript guidelines (this issue) are not followed. Authors may request peer review. All manuscripts submitted are subject to editorial correction or excision where such correction or excision does not alter substance or intent. Layout and Printing Mechanical Prep, Publishing Help by Dennis Howe, Concord, New Hampshire Printed by Speedy Printing, Concord, New Hampshire. Copyright ©2018 by the New York State Archaeological Association Front Cover Photographs The collage of photographs on the front cover are taken from several of the articles in this issue of The Bulletin, which are devoted to the growth and development of the New York State Archaeological Association (NYSAA) over the last hundred years. The collage is a small representation of the many men and women from diverse disciplines who made major archaeological discoveries, established scientific approaches to archaeological studies, and contributed to the formation of NYSAA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loyalists Preschool/Elementary Area
    HOME ABOUT LEARN SERVICES AND PUBLICATIONS CONTACT US HELP SITE MAP FRANÇAIS Search Username •••••••• You are in the Students - You Are Here: Elementary Curriculum>Elementary Social Sciences>Cycle 3>The Loyalists Preschool/Elementary area. (Click to change area.) Elementary Curriculum Preschool Education Arts Education Personal Development Languages Elementary Social Sciences Program Information About the Project Supplementary Resources Cycle 1 During and following the American Revolution (1775-1783), an estimated 50,000 American colonists who Cycle 2 remained loyal to the British Crown sought refuge in the remaining provinces of British North America, now Cycle 3 The Loyalists part of Canada. While most of the Loyalists who came to present-day Quebec eventually relocated to what Overview (after 1791) became Upper Canada, a significant number remained in what became Lower Canada, where Curricular Fit they settled in various areas, particularly in the Eastern Townships and the south coast of Gaspé, and Background made notable contributions to the development of the Province as a whole. Their descendants are many information and include both English-speaking and French-speaking Quebecers. Learning Activities Materials The Loyalists website was designed for Elementary Cycle 2 and 3 Geography, History and Citizenship Additional Resources Kids' Zone Education. We have provided resources to help you guide your students as they travel through time 1820s exploring the lives of Loyalists who left the Thirteen Colonies and settled in present-day Canada from 1776- Community Info. 1792. For a detailed description of the site, see the Overview section. For more information on links to the Math, Science & Technology Social Sciences program, see the Curricular Fit section.
    [Show full text]