DOCSLIB.ORG

Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 16/04/2013, 14.00

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 16/04/2013, 14.00 Public Document Pack Corporate Scrutiny Committee Agenda Date: Tuesday, 16th April, 2013 Time: 2.00 pm Venue: Committee Suite 1,2 & 3, Westfields, Middlewich Road, Sandbach CW11 1HZ The agenda is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 is taken in the presence of the public and press. Part 2 items will be considered in the absence of the public and press for the reasons indicated on the agenda and at the foot of each report. PART 1 – MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED WITH THE PUBLIC AND PRESS PRESENT 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Minutes of Previous meeting (Pages 1 - 4) To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 12 March 2013. 3. Declarations of Interest To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any disclosable pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests in any item on the agenda. 4. Declaration of Party Whip To provide an opportunity for Members to declare the existence of a party whip in relation to any item on the agenda. For any apologies or requests for further information, or to give notice of a question to be asked by a member of the public Contact : Mark Nedderman Tel: 01270 686459 E-Mail: [email protected] 5. Public Speaking Time/Open Session A total period of 15 minutes is allocated for members of the public to make a statement(s) on any matter that falls within the remit of the Committee. Individual members of the public may speak for up to 5 minutes, but the Chairman will decide how the period of time allocated for public speaking will be apportioned, where there are a number of speakers. Note: In order for officers to undertake any background research, it would be helpful if members of the public contacted the Scrutiny officer listed at the foot of the agenda, at least one working day before the meeting to provide brief details of the matter to be covered. 6. Children and Adults Safeguarding Issues (Pages 5 - 12) To receive presentations from Kate Rose Principal Children's Safeguarding Manager on: • The implications off new statutory guidance for safeguarding children and young people • The work of the safeguarding unit. 7. Section 106 Progress report (Pages 13 - 38) To receive a report of the Section 106 Monitoring Officer. 8. School Examination Data (Pages 39 - 104) To consider the 2012 Annual Education Report. 9. Work Programme Progress Report (Pages 105 - 112) To consider a report of the Borough Solicitor. 10. Budget Savings To consider identifying potential items from within the 2013/14 budget which are considered to be sensitive, critical and difficult to achieve with a view to scrutinising those issues in more detail throughout the new civic year. Page 1 Agenda Item 2 CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL Minutes of a meeting of the Corporate Scrutiny Committee held on Tuesday, 12th March, 2013 at Committee Suite 1,2 & 3, Westfields, Middlewich Road, Sandbach CW11 1HZ PRESENT Councillor S Wilkinson (Chairman) Councillor P Edwards (Vice-Chairman) Councillors S Corcoran, H Davenport, R West, S Hogben and McCann Apologies Councillor D Newton and Jill Kelly 17 ALSO PRESENT Councillor Peter Raynes – Finance Portfolio Holder Councillor Rhoda Bailey – Cabinet Support Member Councillor Phil Hoyland – Chairman Children and Families PDG Councillor David Neilson – Chairman Care Leavers Task and Finish Group 18 OFFICERS PRESENT Julie Lewis – Principle Manager Cared for Children Dominic Oakeshott – Head of Business Management and Challenge Mark Nedderman – Senior Scrutiny Officer 19 MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING RESOLVED – That the minutes of the meeting held on 21 February 2013 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. 20 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 21 DECLARATION OF PARTY WHIP There were no declarations of the existence of a party whip. 22 PUBLIC SPEAKING TIME/OPEN SESSION There were no members of the public present who wished to make a statement. 23 CARE LEAVERS TASK AND FINISH REPORT Page 2 The Committee considered a report of the Borough Solicitor relating to a report of a task and finish group set up by the former Childrens and families Scrutiny Committee which explored whether the Council was doing all it could to help young people in care to make a successful transition into adulthood. Councillor David Neilson, Chairman of the Care Leavers Task and Finish Group attended the meeting and introduced the report. RESOLVED – (a) That the report of the Task/Finish group be welcomed and supported; (b) That the recommendations of the Group contained in the report be endorsed, and referred to Cabinet for consideration and necessary action, including referral of any matters considered appropriate to the Children’s and Families Policy Development group for further investigation. (c) That the appreciation of the Committee be placed on record for the endeavours of Mark Grimshaw Scrutiny officer in supporting the work of the Task and Finish group. 24 WORK PROGRAMME PROGRESS REPORT The Committee considered a report of the Borough Solicitor regarding the 2012/13 work programme. The Chairman informed the Committee that he had reviewed the current work programme and had noted that in the main, the work programme consisted of matters handed to the committee from committees that had existed under the Council’s previous scrutiny arrangements. He suggested that due to the spread in the role of the committee it would have to be extremely discerning in its choice of work programme items and would therefore have to focus its attention on a small number of high level, but important matters. He therefore proposed that the current list should be reduced to more manageable levels. He also had noted that in February 2013, the Committee had considered a report on the conclusions of a peer review of the Council’s arrangements for the safeguarding of children, which had taken place between 3 and 7 December 2012. The Committee was informed that this review had now been superseded by an Ofsted inspection which was currently underway in respect of the Council’s child protection arrangements. All of this led the Chairman to conclude that the committee should, as an important area of council services, include safeguarding of both children’s and adults services, and proposed that the Committee should consider adding a standard item on all future agendas, to consider updates on safeguarding issues. The Committee then reviewed the schedule attached to the report and recommended that the following changes be made: Page 3 • Libraries Strategy – Defer any scrutiny activity until such time as the new library arrangements have been in place for 6 months • Car park management task and finish review, update – delete and monitor performance through the quarterly performance reports; • Christmas Bins collection - delete and monitor performance through the quarterly performance reports; • Report on project slippages – capital programme - delete and monitor performance through the quarterly performance reports; • Children’s/Adults ICT update - Defer any scrutiny activity until such time as the new ICT arrangements have been in place for 12 months; • Regulation 33 Visits – to be reported upon quarterly; • New Item – Review of Ofsted report and improvement plan on child protection and safeguarding arrangements • New item – The effectiveness of the new Management Restructure; • New Item – BeWilderwood; • New Item – The impact on schools of the new Ofsted framework; • New Item – Impact of Academy provisions in respect of primary schools. RESOLVED – (a) That the report be received; (b) That the changes listed above be approved; (c) That the Chairman and Vice Chairman be requested to review the revised work programme prior to the next meeting and to allocate, wherever possible, indicative dates for completion; (d) That the review children’s and adults safeguarding issues be included as a standard item on all future agendas for this committee. 25 BUDGET SAVINGS The Committee considered selecting items which had been identified in the approved 2013/14 budget as being the most sensitive, critical and difficult to achieve. The Chairman asked members of the committee to think about potential items to be included under this heading in order that further consideration of specific suggestions could be considered at the next meeting of the committee. The Finance Portfolio Holder suggested the committee might wish to concentrate in the following areas: • Adult Social Care – where costs were increasing Page 4 • Leisure Services • Public Health • Value For Money RESOLVED- That this matter be considered further at the April meeting The meeting commenced at 2.00 pm and concluded at 3.40 pm Councillor S Wilkinson (Chairman) Working Together to Safeguard Children (2013) Page 5 Nigel Moorhouse – Head of Early Intervention & Prevention Agenda Item6 Kate Rose – Manager Children and Adult Safeguarding Introduction l Core legal requirements on individuals and organisations to keep children safe l 1999 – 2013 l 390 pages to 97 Page 6 l Baby Peter Connelly l Prf. E Munro l Emphasis away from process to focus on needs of the child – child first l Be aware l Share information l Professional judgement Local Context l 2000 referrals for help and intervention per year l 375 cared for children l 175 child protection plans l 1500 children in need, Page 7 l 500 CAFs l 3000 Initial & Core statutory assessments l New single statutory assessment by 45 days, shift practice from process to quality of planning and review, greater flexibility. Key issues l Organisational responsibilities – S.11 (Children Act 2004) - across Local Authority services
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Home to School Transport Review Task and Finish Group- Minority Report
    Overview and Scrutiny Review Children and Families Scrutiny Committee Children and Families Scrutiny Committee Minority Report of Councillor Louise Brown September 2011 to December 2011 Home to School Transport Review Task and Finish Group- Minority Report 1 Acknowledgements I wish to offer my thanks to all the officers who have acted as witnesses and in particular, to Mark Grimshaw, Scrutiny Officer. I also wish to offer my thanks to Councillor Frank Keegan for his financial numerical expertise. I do not dispute that the majority report is what the majority of members of the Task and Finish Group proposed but I wish to exercise my right to produce a minority report. In particular, I am concerned that the conclusions failed to fully consider or examine all of the evidence. Firstly, partially due to the limited time available and secondly due to the perspective adopted. Foreword I commend this minority report to the Cabinet and Council and request that it be given full and fair consideration. Councillor Dr Louise Brown Member of the Task and Finish Group on Home to School Transport 2 1. Introduction 1.1. My reason for writing this minority report1 is to simply offer the Children and Families Committee, Cabinet and Council, the opportunity to consider an alternative course of action. 1.2. The recommendations in this minority report are based upon what may be perceived as a best “value for money” approach which seeks to maintain the existing home to school transport. It does so by positively suggesting options which could well result in real “efficiency” savings without the negative and detrimental impact of cutting services without really fully knowing or understanding what the social, environmental and financial impact will be to service users.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames
    [Show full text]
  • Headmaster's Report
    Headmaster’s Report he past year has been a troubled provision is described as excellent Ring Round the Moon; the Spring Term one for schools. We have been which, again, is a tribute to the dedica- production was the musical The Bak- Thorrified by massacre and mur- tion of the staff. And, in the responses er’s Wife at Cumberland Street; whilst der and we have read and heard much to the statement in the questionnaire the Summer Term saw Our Day Out at of the breakdown of discipline and the sent by the inspectors to the parents, Fence Avenue. All these plays were enforced closure of schools by disrup- “My child is happy at school”, 97% fully co-educational and it is clear that tive pupils. answered positively. That, of course, is this is an area where the full Founda- We have seen also, sadly, a series of not good enough, but it is heartening. tion comes together most successfully. “knee-jerk” responses which offer, at This year also saw the first class of The structure for music in the school best, palliatives but certainly not solu- girls, who entered the school when the now also provides for boys and girls to tions to complex and deep-rooted prob- Girls’ Division opened in 1993, take develop their talents in separate groups lems in society. Beneath all this, their first public examinations. They and to come together when they reach however, we have sensed a yearning had been a credit to the school in so a higher standard. With over 400 pupils for established values and moral stand- many ways and duly completed their now taking music lessons, the range ards.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Times All Schools
    Financial Times All Schools - March 2010 Based on 2009 A level results FT Rank 08 Rank FT FT Rank 09 Rank FT 07 Rank FT School Town School type score FT candidate level Points/A 09 exams) (core 09 entry level A Points/core 08 entry level A Points/core candidates Number of 09 exmas) (all 09 only level A taking Pupils 09 candidates) level % girls (A 09 entries/candidate level A Core 09 entries/candidate level A All 09 exams) (all Points/candidate 08 exams) (all Points/candidate 09 (Points/cand) rank Gov/DCSF 08 (Points/cand) rank Gov/DCSF 07 (Points/cand) rank Gov/DCSF exams) method (all 09 - FT Rank exams) method (all 08 - FT Rank exams) method (all 07 - FT Rank 09 subjects) (core grade/entry A % 08 subjects) (core grade/entry A % 09 subjects) (core AB/candidate No 09 AB rank AAB % cands at least 09 subjects) (core AAB % cands at least 08 subjects) (core Bedfordshire Bedford College Bedford Other 388 201 202 373 72 78 1.9 2.5 586 576 14 10 0.6 3 5 351 229 285 Bedford High School (IB) Bedford Ind 1.99 562 243 245 120 96 100 2.3 2.8 878 900 440 371 406 410 385 315 51 47 1.7 374 28 32 282 407 329 Bedford Modern School Bedford Ind 2.43 591 248 241 139 139 14 2.4 3.1 858 827 527 669 596 221 341 336 49 39 1.9 284 29 19 260 219 178 Bedford School (IB) Bedford Ind 2.55 655 241 241 142 94 0 2.7 3.2 946 906 239 352 324 311 404 285 45 44 2.0 252 31 32 768 Biddenham Up Sch & Sp Coll Bedford Comp 389 210 209 110 109 57 1.9 2.6 677 676 941 21 21 0.8 6 6 Cardinal Newman Cath Sch Luton Comp 342 205 201 95 83 57 1.7 2.6 666 672 16 14 0.6 5 1 Cedars Upper
    [Show full text]
  • School Name POSTCODE AUCL Eligible If Taken GCSE's at This
    School Name POSTCODE AUCL Eligible if taken GCSE's at this AUCL Eligible if taken A-levels at school this school City of London School for Girls EC2Y 8BB No No City of London School EC4V 3AL No No Haverstock School NW3 2BQ Yes Yes Parliament Hill School NW5 1RL No Yes Regent High School NW1 1RX Yes Yes Hampstead School NW2 3RT Yes Yes Acland Burghley School NW5 1UJ No Yes The Camden School for Girls NW5 2DB No No Maria Fidelis Catholic School FCJ NW1 1LY Yes Yes William Ellis School NW5 1RN Yes Yes La Sainte Union Catholic Secondary NW5 1RP No Yes School St Margaret's School NW3 7SR No No University College School NW3 6XH No No North Bridge House Senior School NW3 5UD No No South Hampstead High School NW3 5SS No No Fine Arts College NW3 4YD No No Camden Centre for Learning (CCfL) NW1 8DP Yes No Special School Swiss Cottage School - Development NW8 6HX No No & Research Centre Saint Mary Magdalene Church of SE18 5PW No No England All Through School Eltham Hill School SE9 5EE No Yes Plumstead Manor School SE18 1QF Yes Yes Thomas Tallis School SE3 9PX No Yes The John Roan School SE3 7QR Yes Yes St Ursula's Convent School SE10 8HN No No Riverston School SE12 8UF No No Colfe's School SE12 8AW No No Moatbridge School SE9 5LX Yes No Haggerston School E2 8LS Yes Yes Stoke Newington School and Sixth N16 9EX No No Form Our Lady's Catholic High School N16 5AF No Yes The Urswick School - A Church of E9 6NR Yes Yes England Secondary School Cardinal Pole Catholic School E9 6LG No No Yesodey Hatorah School N16 5AE No No Bnois Jerusalem Girls School N16
    [Show full text]
  • DIUS Register Final Version
    Register of Education and Training Providers as last maintained by the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills on the 30 March 2009 College Name Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Postcode Telephone Email 12 training 1 Sherwood Place, 153 Sherwood DrivBletchley, Milton Keynes Bucks MK3 6RT 0845 605 1212 [email protected] 16 Plus Team Ltd Oakridge Chambers 1 - 3 Oakridge Road BROMLEY BR1 5QW 1st Choice Training and Assessment Centre Ltd 8th Floor, Hannibal House Elephant & Castle London SE1 6TE 020 7277 0979 1st Great Western Train Co 1st Floor High Street Station Swansea SA1 1NU 01792 632238 2 Sisters Premier Division Ltd Ram Boulevard Foxhills Industrial Estate SCUNTHORPE DN15 8QW 21st Century I.T 78a Rushey Green Catford London SE6 4HW 020 8690 0252 [email protected] 2C Limited 7th Floor Lombard House 145 Great Charles Street BIRMINGHAM B3 3LP 0121 200 1112 2C Ltd Victoria House 287a Duke Street, Fenton Stoke on Trent ST4 3NT 2nd City Academy City Gate 25 Moat Lane Digbeth, Birmingham B5 5BD 0121 622 2212 2XL Training Limited 662 High Road Tottenham London N17 0AB 020 8493 0047 [email protected] 360 GSP College Trident Business Centre 89 Bickersteth Road London SW17 9SH 020 8672 4151 / 084 3E'S Enterprises (Trading) Ltd Po Box 1017 Cooks Lane BIRMINGHAM B37 6NZ 5 E College of London Selby Centre Selby Road London N17 8JL 020 8885 3456 5Cs Training 1st Floor Kingston Court Walsall Road CANNOCK WS11 0HG 01543 572241 6S Consulting Limited c/o 67 OCEAN WHARF 60 WESTFERRY ROAD LONDON E14 8JS 7city Learning Ltd 4 Chiswell
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 03/05/2011, 10.00
    Public Document Pack Cabinet Agenda Date: Tuesday, 3rd May, 2011 Time: 10.00 am Venue: The Tatton Room - Town Hall, Macclesfield SK10 1DX The agenda is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 is taken in the presence of the public and press. Part 2 items will be considered in the absence of the public and press for the reasons indicated on the agenda and at the foot of each report. PART 1 – MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED WITH THE PUBLIC AND PRESS PRESENT 1. Apologies for Absence To note any apologies for absence. 2. Declarations of Interest To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any personal and/or prejudicial interests in any item on the agenda. 3. Public Speaking Time/Open Session In accordance with Procedure Rules Nos.11 and 35 a total period of 10 minutes is allocated for members of the public to address the Committee on any matter relevant to the work of the Committee. Individual members of the public may speak for up to 5 minutes but the Chairman will decide how the period of time allocated for public speaking will be apportioned where there are a number of speakers. In order for an informed answer to be given, where a member of the public wishes to ask a question of a Cabinet Member three clear working days notice must be given and the question must be submitted in writing at the time of notification. It is not required to give notice of the intention to make use of public speaking provision but, as a matter of courtesy, a period of 24 hours notice is encouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Institution Code Institution Title a and a Co, Nepal
    Institution code Institution title 49957 A and A Co, Nepal 37428 A C E R, Manchester 48313 A C Wales Athens, Greece 12126 A M R T C ‐ Vi Form, London Se5 75186 A P V Baker, Peterborough 16538 A School Without Walls, Kensington 75106 A T S Community Employment, Kent 68404 A2z Management Ltd, Salford 48524 Aalborg University 45313 Aalen University of Applied Science 48604 Aalesund College, Norway 15144 Abacus College, Oxford 16106 Abacus Tutors, Brent 89618 Abbey C B S, Eire 14099 Abbey Christian Brothers Grammar Sc 16664 Abbey College, Cambridge 11214 Abbey College, Cambridgeshire 16307 Abbey College, Manchester 11733 Abbey College, Westminster 15779 Abbey College, Worcestershire 89420 Abbey Community College, Eire 89146 Abbey Community College, Ferrybank 89213 Abbey Community College, Rep 10291 Abbey Gate College, Cheshire 13487 Abbey Grange C of E High School Hum 13324 Abbey High School, Worcestershire 16288 Abbey School, Kent 10062 Abbey School, Reading 16425 Abbey Tutorial College, Birmingham 89357 Abbey Vocational School, Eire 12017 Abbey Wood School, Greenwich 13586 Abbeydale Grange School 16540 Abbeyfield School, Chippenham 26348 Abbeylands School, Surrey 12674 Abbot Beyne School, Burton 12694 Abbots Bromley School For Girls, St 25961 Abbot's Hill School, Hertfordshire 12243 Abbotsfield & Swakeleys Sixth Form, 12280 Abbotsfield School, Uxbridge 12732 Abbotsholme School, Staffordshire 10690 Abbs Cross School, Essex 89864 Abc Tuition Centre, Eire 37183 Abercynon Community Educ Centre, Wa 11716 Aberdare Boys School, Rhondda Cynon 10756 Aberdare College of Fe, Rhondda Cyn 10757 Aberdare Girls Comp School, Rhondda 79089 Aberdare Opportunity Shop, Wales 13655 Aberdeen College, Aberdeen 13656 Aberdeen Grammar School, Aberdeen Institution code Institution title 16291 Aberdeen Technical College, Aberdee 79931 Aberdeen Training Centre, Scotland 36576 Abergavenny Careers 26444 Abersychan Comprehensive School, To 26447 Abertillery Comprehensive School, B 95244 Aberystwyth Coll of F.
    [Show full text]
  • DFE Number Institution Name 2024104 Haverstock School
    University of Kent's Institution Contextual Flag All schools on this list meet the requirements for the University of Kent's Institution Contextual Flag. The Institution Contextual Flag is given to all institutions whose data indicates that they perform in the bottom 40% nationally for KS5 results reported by the Department for Education each year. We use the average point school per entry and where data is not available, we use KS4 result, if available. In order to make this more reliable we look at data over a three year period to see if they are low performing for at least two out of the last three years. In cases where an Institution is flagged, but subsequently closes, the flag will be retained and the institution will continue to appear on the list. We use the Institution supplied by you in your UCAS application (the UCAS centre or Last Institution) to identify whether it has a Contextual Flag. Please note: independent schools are not included, neither do we have data from government agencies in Scotland and Northern Ireland and therefore these cannot be given a flag. Similarly, there may be schools or colleges which have recently changed name, status or have merged and this has resulted in no data being reported by the Department of Education , in these instances we will not be able to assess the Institution for a Contextual Flag.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2019 Entry
    Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2019 Entry Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. UCAS School Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Code School Name Post Code Code Indicator Indicator 9314901 12474 16-19 Abingdon OX14 1JB N/A Yes 9336207 19110 3 Dimensions TA20 3AJ N/A N/A 9316007 15144 Abacus College OX3 9AX
    [Show full text]
  • DFE Number Institution Name 2024104 Haverstock School
    University of Kent's Institution Contextual Flag All schools on this list meet the requirements for the University of Kent's Institution Contextual Flag. The Institution Contextual Flag is given to all institutions whose data indicates that they perform in the bottom 40% nationally for KS5 results reported by the Department for Education each year. We use the average point school per entry and where data is not available, we use KS4 result, if available. In order to make this more reliable we look at data over a three year period to see if they are low performing for at least two out of the last three years. In cases where an Institution is flagged, but subsequently closes, the flag will be retained and the institution will continue to appear on the list. We use the Institution supplied by you in your UCAS application (the UCAS centre or Last Institution) to identify whether it has a Contextual Flag. Please note: independent schools are not included, neither do we have data from government agencies in Scotland and Northern Ireland and therefore these cannot be given a flag. Similarly, there may be schools or colleges which have recently changed name, status or have merged and this has resulted in no data being reported by the Department of Education , in these instances we will not be able to assess the Institution for a Contextual Flag.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference List Sand-Filled/Sand-Dressed Synthetic Grass Sports Pitches
    REFERENCE LIST SAND-FILLED/SAND-DRESSED SYNTHETIC GRASS SPORTS PITCHES Installation Synthetic Carpet Shockpad Contracts Currently Underway Herne Bay High School, Kent Stadium 25 Existing Highfield Priory School, Preston Premier 20 None Wick Joint Campus, Wick Stadium 25 None St Catherine’s Care Home, St Helens Premier 10 Global 15mm Prefab Kenton College, Nairobi, Kenya Premier 10 National 15mm Insitu Installed 2015 Golborne Sports & Social Club, Warrington (resurface) Premier 10 National Existing Archbishop Blanch School, Liverpool Premier 20 15mm Insitu Teddington Sports Centre, Middlesex (reconstruction) Lano 15mm Insitu Installed 2014 Driffield Leisure Centre, East Riding of Yorkshire (resurface) Premier 10 National 15mm Insitu Priestnall School, Stockport (resurface) Premier 20P 15mm Insitu Bohunt School, Hampshire (resurface) Premier 20P Existing Taunton Vale Sports Club, Somerset (reconstruction) Greenfields 15mm Insitu Holly Lodge Girls’ College, Liverpool Stadium 25 15mm Insitu Groby Community College, Leicestershire (resurface) Stadium 25 LSR Existing Ormiston Sandwell Community Academy, Oldbury (resurface) Stadium 25 Existing Installed 2013 Crewe Vagrants Sports Club Ltd, Crewe Premier 10 National Exisiting Holland Park School, London Stadium 25 LSR 15mm Insitu Barton Moss Secure Unit, Salford Premier 10 Global None Great Sankey Primary School, Warrington Stadium 25 15mm Insitu Port Glasgow Shared Campus Stadium 25 15mm Insitu Oasis Hadley Academy, Enfield Stadium 25 15mm Insitu Pg 1 REFERENCE LIST SAND-FILLED/SAND-DRESSED
    [Show full text]