DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report – 1999

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report – 1999 Tributary Reservoir Regulation Activities 2003 Annual Report (August 2002 - July 2003) Cunningham Dam and Reservoir Omaha, Nebraska Water Control and Water Quality Section Hydrologic Engineering Branch Engineering Division Omaha District December 2003 2003 ANNUAL REPORT TRIBUTARY RESERVOIR REGULATION ACTIVITIES (AUGUST 2002 – JULY 2003) NORTHWEST DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION...................................................................................1-1 CHAPTER 2 – RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT..........................................2-1 a. Reservoirs with Flood Control Storage ..............................................................2-1 b. Reservoirs without Flood Control Storage .........................................................2-2 CHAPTER 3 – TRIBUTARY RUNOFF AND FLOODS .................................................3-1 a. General Hydrologic Conditions ..........................................................................3-1 i. Long-Term Trends ..................................................................................3-1 ii. Rocky Mountain Snow Conditions...........................................................3-1 b. Significant Weather Events, August 2002 through July 2003 ............................3-5 i. Late Summer 2002..................................................................................3-5 ii. Fall 2002 .................................................................................................3-5 iii. Winter of 2002-2003................................................................................3-6 iv. Spring 2003.............................................................................................3-8 v. Summer 2003..........................................................................................3-9 c. Runoff into Tributary Reservoirs ......................................................................3-12 CHAPTER 4 – RESERVOIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS ...................................................4-1 a. Flood Damages Prevented ................................................................................4-1 b. Recreation Usage..............................................................................................4-6 CHAPTER 5 – RESERVOIR OPERATIONS................................................................5-1 a. Previous Year Operations..................................................................................5-2 i. Corps of Engineers Lakes.......................................................................5-2 ii. Bureau of Reclamation Dams.................................................................5-2 b. Proposed Operations.........................................................................................5-3 i. Corps of Engineers .................................................................................5-3 (1) Colorado..........................................................................................5-3 (2) Nebraska.........................................................................................5-3 (3) North Dakota...................................................................................5-3 (4) South Dakota ..................................................................................5-4 ii. Bureau of Reclamation............................................................................5-4 (1) Canyon Ferry ..................................................................................5-4 (2) Tiber (Lake Elwell) ..........................................................................5-5 (3) Yellowtail.........................................................................................5-5 (4) Others .............................................................................................5-5 i CHAPTER 6 – MAJOR REGULATION ISSUES...........................................................6-1 a. Water Quality.....................................................................................................6-1 b. Downstream Channel Capacity .........................................................................6-2 c. Releases for Purposes other than Authorized Project Functions.......................6-3 d. Potential Hazardous Conditions.........................................................................6-3 e. Dam Safety Issues.............................................................................................6-3 i. Corps of Engineers Dams.......................................................................6-3 (1) Cherry Creek Dam...........................................................................6-3 (2) Cold Brook Dam ..............................................................................6-4 (3) Salt Creek Dams..............................................................................6-4 ii. Bureau of Reclamation Dams.................................................................6-4 (1) Clark Canyon Dam ..........................................................................6-4 (2) Canyon Ferry Dam ..........................................................................6-4 (3) Tiber Dam........................................................................................6-4 (4) Boysen Dam ....................................................................................6-4 (5) Yellowtail Dam .................................................................................6-4 (6) Heart Butte Dam..............................................................................6-5 (7) Jamestown Dam ..............................................................................6-5 (8) Keyhole Dam ...................................................................................6-5 (9) Pactola Dam ....................................................................................6-5 (10) Shadehill Dam .................................................................................6-5 (11) Glendo Dam.....................................................................................6-5 CHAPTER 7 – WATER CONTROL MANUALS............................................................7-1 a. Current Manual Status.......................................................................................7-1 b. Work Priorities ...................................................................................................7-1 CHAPTER 8 – DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES......................8-1 a. Water Control Data Collection ...........................................................................8-1 i. Sources...................................................................................................8-1 ii. Storage ...................................................................................................8-1 iii. Data Collection Equipment......................................................................8-1 b. Cooperative Hydrologic Programs.....................................................................8-2 c. Water Quality.....................................................................................................8-2 d. Sediment............................................................................................................8-5 i. Bed and Suspended Sediment Sampling................................................8-5 ii. Sedimentation Surveys ...........................................................................8-5 CHAPTER 9 – WATER CONTROL INITIATIVES.........................................................9-1 a. Water Control Initiatives.....................................................................................9-1 i. Missouri River Region Water Control Data System Master Plan.............9-1 ii. Geographical Information System (GIS) .................................................9-1 b. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Applications..........................9-1 c. Personnel...........................................................................................................9-1 d. Training..............................................................................................................9-2 ii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 2-1 Corps of Engineers Tributary Reservoirs, Omaha District......................... 2-1 2-2 Bureau of Reclamation Tributary Reservoirs, Omaha District ................... 2-2 3-1 Mountain Snowpack Moisture as a Percent of Normal.............................. 3-2 3-2 Recorded and Annual Precip for Various Locations.................................. 3-6 3-3 Runoff Amounts and Peak Pool Levels ................................................... 3-12 3-4 Provisional 2003 Water Year Peak Stages and Discharges.................... 3-13 4-1 Omaha District Projects Flood Damages Prevented FY 2002 - Local and Mainstem Reductions............................................... 4-1 4-2 Bureau of Reclamation Projects Flood Damages Prevented FY02 - Local and Mainstem Reductions.................................................... 4-5 4-3 Flood Damages Prevented by State, Omaha District, FY 2002................. 4-6 4-4 Recreation Visitation Hours ....................................................................... 4-6 5-1 Tributary Reservoir Flood Control Operation (2002 Water Year)............... 5-1 5-2 Utilization of Exclusive Flood Control Zone Omaha District Tributary Projects.............................................................. 5-2 6-1 Water Quality Issues and Concerns .........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Floods in North and South Dakota Frequency and Magnitude
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS IN NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA FREQUENCY AND MAGNITUDE By John A. McCabe and Orlo A. Crosby Prepared in cooperation with the NORTH DAKOTA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AND THE SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Open-file report Bismarck, North Dakota May 1959 DEC 15 1967 PREFACE This report was prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the North Dakota State Highway Department and the South Dakota Department of Highways. The work was performed under the supervision of H. M. Erskine. District Engineer, Surface Water Branch. Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey. The authors were assisted by R. E. West. Advice and review were furnished by the Floods Section. Surface Water Branch, Washington. D. C. The streamflow records used in this report were collected and compiled by the U. S. Geological Survey co­ operating with the following agencies: the North Dakota State Engineer and State Water Conservation Commission; pthe South Dakota State Engineer, State Geologist. State Fish and Game Commission, and State Water Resources Commission; the Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army; the Department of State; the Bureau of Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; the Soil Conservation Service, Department of Agriculture; and others. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract. .................. 1 Gaging-station records--Continued Introduction ................. 1 Red River of the North basin--Continued Description of the area .......... 1 Sheyenne River at West Fargo, Physiography ............ 1 N. Dak. (13). ........... 41 Climate ............... 1 Maple River at Mapleton, N. Dak. (14) . 42 Causes of floods ............. 1 Rush River at Amenia, N.
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota 2016 Integrated Section 305(B) Water Quality Assessment Report and Section 303(D) List of Waters Needing Total Maximum Daily Loads
    North Dakota 2016 Integrated Section 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report and Section 303(d) List of Waters Needing Total Maximum Daily Loads Submitted to the US EPA January 23, 2017 Approved February 21, 2017 North Dakota 2016 Integrated Section 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report and Section 303(d) List of Waters Needing Total Maximum Daily Loads Doug Burgum, Governor Arvy Smith and L. David Glatt, Co-acting State Health Officer North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality Gold Seal Center, 4th Floor 918 East Divide Ave. Bismarck, North Dakota 58501-1947 701.328.5210 . Cover Photograph Photograph of Gravel Lake located in the Turtle Mountain region of the state (Rolette County). Gravel Lake was sampled by the North Dakota Department of Health in 2012 as part of the US EPA sponsored National Lakes Assessment. i CONTENTS PART I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. I-1 PART II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. II-1 A. Section 305(b) Water Quality Assessment Report .......................................................... II-1 B. Section 303(d) TMDL List of Water Quality-limited Waters.......................................... II-1 PART III. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... III-1 A. Atlas ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Abstracts
    2021 WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA HYDROLOGY CONFERENCE Program and Abstracts April 21–22, 2021 Virtual conference 2021 Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference This program and abstracts book has been produced in conjunction with the virtual 2021 Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference (19th annual). This document provides summaries of the presentations made during the conference, and gives attendees contact information for the presenters for additional questions or collaboration following the conference. The purpose of the Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference is to bring together researchers from Federal, State, University, local government, and private organizations and provide a forum to discuss topics dealing with water, energy, and environmental issues in western South Dakota and the entire upper Great Plains region. This meeting provides an opportunity for hydrologists, geologists, engineers, scientists, geographers, students, and other interested individuals to exchange ideas, discuss mutual problems, and summarize results of studies. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have contributed to this meeting. The presenters are thanked for their contributions and moderators are thanked for their help in streamlining the presentations. The organizing agencies are thanked for support: National Weather Service, RESPEC, South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, U.S. Geological Survey, and West Dakota Water Development District. The chairpersons for this meeting were Melissa Smith (National Weather Service), Lacy Pomarleau (RESPEC), Joanne Noyes (South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources), Scott Kenner (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Liangping Li (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), J. Foster Sawyer (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Arden Davis (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Galen Hoogestraat (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Elwell (Tiber Dam)
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2013 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2014 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2013 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING, AND THE DAKOTAS INTRODUCTION RESERVOIRS UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MONTANA AREA OFFICE SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS DURING WY 2013 ........................................................................................................................ 1 FLOOD BENEFITS...................................................................................................................... 12 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2013 .............................................................. 14 Clark Canyon Reservoir ............................................................................................................ 14 Canyon Ferry Lake and Powerplant ......................................................................................... 21 Helena Valley Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 32 Sun River Project ...................................................................................................................... 34 Gibson Reservoir .................................................................................................................. 34 Pishkun Reservoir ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 390 DISCHARGE at PARTIAL-RECORD STATIONS As
    390 DISCHARGE AT PARTIAL-RECORD STATIONS As the number of streams on which streamflow information is likely to be desired far exceeds the number of stream-gaging stations feasible to operate at one time, the Geological Survey collects limited streamflow data at sites other than stream-gaging stations. When limited streamflow data are collected on a systematic basis over a period of years for use in hydrologic analyses, the site at which the data are collected is called a partial-record station. Data collected at these partial-record stations are usable in low-flow or floodflow analyses, depending on the type of data collected. Crest-stage partial-record stations The following table contains annual maximum discharges for crest-stage stations. A crest-stage gage is a device which will register the peak stage occurring between inspections of the gage. A stage-discharge relation for each gage is developed from discharge measurements made by indirect measurements of peak flow or by current meter. The date of the maximum discharge is not always certain but is usually determined by comparison with nearby continuous-record stations, weather records, or local inquiry. Only the maximum discharge and gage height for each water year are given. Information on some lower floods may have been obtained but is not published herein. The years given in the period of record represent water years for which the annual maximum has been determined. Stations that are noted with “METWARN” are part of a flood-warning system for Rapid City and surrounding area and are equipped with real- time satellite data-collection platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • 107 Part 208—Flood Control Regulations
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 208.10 PART 208—FLOOD CONTROL sponsible for the efficient operation REGULATIONS and maintenance of all of the struc- tures and facilities during flood periods Sec. and for continuous inspection and 208.10 Local flood protection works; mainte- maintenance of the project works dur- nance and operation of structures and fa- ing periods of low water, all without cilities. cost to the United States. 208.11 Regulations for use of storage allo- (3) A reserve supply of materials cated for flood control or navigation and/ or project operation at reservoirs subject needed during a flood emergency shall to prescription of rules and regulations be kept on hand at all times. by the Secretary of the Army in the in- (4) No encroachment or trespass terest of flood control and navigation. which will adversely affect the effi- 208.19 Marshall Ford Dam and Reservoir cient operation or maintenance of the (Mansfield Dam and Lake Travis), Colo- project works shall be permitted upon rado River, Tex. 208.22 Twin Buttes Dam and Reservoir, Mid- the rights-of-way for the protective fa- dle and South Concho Rivers, Tex. cilities. 208.25 Pensacola Dam and Reservoir, Grand (5) No improvement shall be passed (Neosho) River, Okla. over, under, or through the walls, lev- 208.26 Altus Dam and Reservoir, North Fork ees, improved channels or floodways, Red River, Okla. nor shall any excavation or construc- 208.27 Fort Cobb Dam and Reservoir, Pond (Cobb) Creek, Oklahoma. tion be permitted within the limits of 208.28 Foss Dam and Reservoir, Washita the project right-of-way, nor shall any River, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • 41:07:03:03. Daily, Possession, and Length Limit Restrictions on Special Management Waters -- Additional Restrictions Described
    41:07:03:03. Daily, possession, and length limit restrictions on special management waters -- Additional restrictions described. Daily limit, possession limit, length limit, and additional restrictions on special management waters are described as follows: (1) Catfish may be taken without limit on the Grand, Moreau, Cheyenne, Belle Fourche, Bad, White, and Little Missouri Rivers; and in the inland waters of the Missouri River and its impoundments; (2) In the waters of Lake Alvin and Nine Mile Creek from the Lake Alvin Dam to the Sioux River in Lincoln County, Lake Campbell in Campbell County, Murdo City Lake, Murdo Railroad Lake, and Richland Dam in Jones County, Sheridan Lake in Pennington County, Lake Hiddenwood in Walworth County, Lake Menno in Hutchinson County, Lake Mitchell in Davison County, Firesteel Creek above Lake Mitchell to Davison County Road No. 12 (Loomis Oil), Wilmarth Lake in Aurora County, Marindahl Lake and Lake Yankton in Yankton County, Tripp Lake in Hutchinson County, Rosehill Lake and Jones Lake in Hand County, Durkee Lake and Curlew Lake in Meade County, Burke Lake in Gregory County, Simon Lake in Potter County, Corsica Lake in Douglas County, Richmond Lake in Brown County, Lake Henry and East and West Heritage GPA ponds in Bon Homme County, and McCook Lake in Union County, New Underwood Lake in Pennington County, Stockade Lake and Bismarck Lake in Custer County, the minimum length limit for largemouth and smallmouth bass is 15 inches; (3) In New Wall Dam in Pennington County, Newell Lake in Butte County, and
    [Show full text]
  • Boysen Reservoir and Powerplant
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2015 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2016 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2015 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING, AND THE DAKOTAS INTRODUCTION RESERVOIRS UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MONTANA AREA OFFICE SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS DURING WY 2015 ........................................................................................................................ 1 FLOOD BENEFITS ...................................................................................................................... 13 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2015 .............................................................. 15 Clark Canyon Reservoir ............................................................................................................ 15 Canyon Ferry Lake and Powerplant .......................................................................................... 21 Helena Valley Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 32 Sun River Project ...................................................................................................................... 34 Gibson Reservoir ................................................................................................................... 34 Pishkun Reservoir ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 South Dakota Drought Mitigation Plan 2015
    SOUTH DAKOTA DROUGHT MITIGATION PLAN November 2015 Prepared by the South Dakota Drought Task Force In partnership with the South Dakota Office of Emergency Management Department of Public Safety South Dakota Drought Mitigation Plan November 2015 Prepared by the South Dakota Drought Task Force In partnership with the South Dakota Office of Emergency Management Department of Public Safety With professional planning assistance from Amec Foster Wheeler, Inc. Table of Contents 1 PREREQUISITE .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Adoption ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 2 PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Description of the Planning Process ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Coordination among Agencies .................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Program Integration .................................................................................................... 2-8 3 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Identifying the Drought Hazard .................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Drought Hazard Profile ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of 1950
    Floods of 1950 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1137 This water-supply paper was printed as separate chapters, A-I UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1954 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director CONTENTS [The letters in parentheses preceding the titles are those used to designate |e papers for separate publication] Page (A) Missouri River basin floods of April-May 1950 in North and outh Dakota, by R. E. Oltman and others___________ __ 1 (B) Floods of 1950 in the Red River of the North and Winnipeg liver basins__________________________________. __ 115 (C) Flood of August 1950 in the Waimea area, Kauai, Hawaii, by t. K. Chun____________________________________ .__ 327 (D) Floods of May-July 1950 in southeastern Nebrasko_______. __ 351 (B) Floods of 1950 in southwestern Oregon and northwestern Calif nia_ 413 (F) Floods of November-December 1950 in the Central Valley Rsin, California_______________________________. __ 505 (G) Floods of 1950 in the upper Mississippi River and Lake Su >rior basins in Minnesota______________________ ____ 791 (H) Floods of November-December 1950 in western Nevada _ 897 (I) Summary of floods in the United States during 1950___ __. __ 957 Missouri River Basin Floods of April-May 1950 in North and South Dakota By R. E. OLTMAN and others FLOODS OF 1950 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1137-A Prepared in cooperation with the North Dakota State Water Conservation Commission, the South Dakota State Engineer, the Corps of Engineers, United States Army, and the United States Bureau of Reclamation UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1951 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L.
    [Show full text]
  • 06-02-1972 Rapid City SD – Carter – Tank – Summers -3 Ffs Flood Rescue Dam Fail
    06-02-1972 Rapid City SD – Carter – Tank – Summers -3 FFs Flood Rescue Dam Fail RAPID CITY FIRE DEPT. https://penningtoncountyemergency.wordpress.com/2015/06/09/remembering- the-flood-of-1972/ Then: 1972 Fire Chief Ken Johnson 71 responding personnel 3 Sub-stations, (Stations 3, 4, & 7) 3 Firefighters lost in the flood, Capt. George Carter, Lt. Henry “Hank” Tank, George “Ike” Sumners Now: 2012 https://penningtoncountyemergency.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/newspaper- june-26-pd-and-fd1.jpg PSDiver Magazine www.PSDiver.com Page 1 https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1241&dat=19720612&id=Rm9TAAAAIBAJ&sjid=8IUDAAAAIB AJ&pg=5474,5031249&hl=en PSDiver Magazine www.PSDiver.com Page 2 Historical Vignette: The Rapid City Flood, June 1972 http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Media/Fact-Sheets/Fact-Sheet-Article- View/Article/581806/historical-vignette-the-rapid-city-flood-june-1972/ The Rapid City Flood, June 1972 The citizens of Rapid City, South Dakota, thought of their visitors and themselves when they won Works Progress Administration funding in the 1930's to build Canyon Lake Dam on Rapid Creek. The 1,000-foot-long dam was built on the edge of the city. With a 70-foot base and 30-foot crown, the 20-foot-high dam backed up a 40-acre lake for recreation. The lake was great for fishing and boating, but the dam's 3.5-foot free-board was inadequate for containment of any substantial flood. Courtesy Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Rapid City. Graphic Restoration by Al Barrus As Rapid City grew, so did the need for drinking water.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish And
    Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Fisheries Mitigation Programs Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service May 28,2002 Table of Contents Introduction Definition of Terms General Authorities Recommendations to Facilitate Full Cost Recovery Recommendations for Administrative Actions Recommendations for Legislation Current Fisheries Mitigation Programs Overview Description of Fisheries Mitigation Programs Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tennessee Valley Authority National Marine Fisheries Service Bonneville Power Administration Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Department of Agriculture Appendix I Recent Directives and Recommendations for Fisheries Mitigation Programs 75 Appendix I1 List of Hatcheries involved in Mitigation and State Location 77 Appendix I11 List of Species Raised for Mitigation Programs 78 INTRODUCTION The predecessor of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), the U.S. Commission on Fish and Fisheries, was formed in 1871 to protect and enhance fisheries which were being depleted by a growing Nation. Since that time, the Service's Fisheries Program, including the National Fish Hatchery System (NFHS), has been involved in, among other things, mitigating the losses of fish habitats, fish populations, and fishing opportunities. The U.S. Congress and the Courts have provided laws, appropriations, and orders which have authorized the construction and operation of dams, and other water diversion projects. The construction and operation of these Federal water resource development projects have had impacts on many water systems and their respective fish populations. The construction and operation of these projects have resulted in the need to build and operate fish hatcheries to provide direct mitigation (e.g., provide disease-free fish eggs or fish for stocking) for waters impaired by Federal water resource development projects.
    [Show full text]