2015 South Dakota Drought Mitigation Plan 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2015 South Dakota Drought Mitigation Plan 2015 SOUTH DAKOTA DROUGHT MITIGATION PLAN November 2015 Prepared by the South Dakota Drought Task Force In partnership with the South Dakota Office of Emergency Management Department of Public Safety South Dakota Drought Mitigation Plan November 2015 Prepared by the South Dakota Drought Task Force In partnership with the South Dakota Office of Emergency Management Department of Public Safety With professional planning assistance from Amec Foster Wheeler, Inc. Table of Contents 1 PREREQUISITE .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Adoption ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 2 PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Description of the Planning Process ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Coordination among Agencies .................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Program Integration .................................................................................................... 2-8 3 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Identifying the Drought Hazard .................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Drought Hazard Profile ............................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Vulnerability by Sector Overview ............................................................................ 3-16 3.4 Water Resources........................................................................................................ 3-16 3.5 Health and Socioeconomic Sector ............................................................................ 3-52 3.6 Agricultural Sector .................................................................................................... 3-76 3.7 Wildfire Sector ........................................................................................................ 3-106 3.8 Wildlife Sector ........................................................................................................ 3-134 3.9 Tourism Sector ........................................................................................................ 3-156 4 MITIGATION STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Hazard Mitigation Goals ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 State Drought Mitigation Capability Assessment ....................................................... 4-2 4.3 Mitigation Actions ...................................................................................................... 4-7 4.4 Funding Sources ........................................................................................................ 4-14 5 PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCESS ................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Monitoring, Evaluation and Updating the Plan........................................................... 5-1 5.2 Monitoring Progress of Mitigation Activities ............................................................. 5-3 State of South Dakota i Drought Mitigation Plan November 2015 Appendices Appendix A – Planning Process Documentation Appendix B – Stakeholder and Public Participation Plan Appendix C – References Appendix D –Public Survey Results State of South Dakota ii Drought Mitigation Plan November 2015 Executive Summary The South Dakota Drought Mitigation Plan (Plan) was developed to provide a strategy for the State of South Dakota to reduce the impacts of drought-related water shortages over the short and long term. There are two major components of the plan: the mitigation strategy and vulnerability assessment. The Plan was prepared in coordination with the State’s Drought Task Force, which is comprised of various state agencies and co-chaired by the Departments of Agriculture and Department of Public Safety, Office of Emergency Management. Included is a description of the process used to prepare the Plan and a profile of the drought hazard in South Dakota, including the nature of impacts and probability of occurrence. A drought vulnerability assessment discusses the past and potential impacts to six sectors that include agriculture, health and socioeconomic, tourism, water resources, wildland fire, and wildlife. The vulnerability assessment is covered in detail in Chapter 3. The mitigation strategy outlines the goals of the Plan and specific action items intended to meet those goals. Many of these mitigation actions can occur during drought and non-drought times. A capability assessment describes the State’s pre- and post-disaster plans, policies, and procedures in place that already help manage and reduce drought impacts. The Plan describes funding sources that can be used to implement local mitigation projects and plans and a description of the process for implementation, monitoring and evaluating the Plan. State of South Dakota iii Drought Mitigation Plan November 2015 1 PREREQUISITE The Drought Mitigation Plan (hereto referred to as the Plan or Drought Plan) was developed, reviewed and approved by the South Dakota Office of Emergency Management (OEM) and Drought Task Force (DTF) by direction of the Office of the Governor. This Plan is a hazard-specific annex to the State of South Dakota Hazard Mitigation Plan and as such was prepared to be in alignment with the associated requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA or DMA 2000) (Public Law 106-390) and the implementing regulations set forth by the Interim Final Rule published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002 (44 CFR §201.6) and finalized on October 31, 2007. Hereafter, these requirements and regulations will be referred to collectively as the DMA. The State of South Dakota assures it will comply with all applicable federal statutes and regulations in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding in compliance with 44 CFR Part 13.11(c). This Plan’s update cycle will align with that of the South Dakota HMP. State of South Dakota 1-1 Drought Mitigation Plan November 2015 2 PLANNING PROCESS 2.1 Description of the Planning Process This section details the planning process conducted during 2014-2015 to develop the Drought Mitigation Plan. The State of South Dakota experienced a short-lived but severe drought in 2012 that extended into 2013. One of the outcomes of this drought was a recognition of the importance of having a long term drought mitigation planning strategy, based on a sector–driven vulnerability assessment. A structured plan development process based on multi-agency collaboration was utilized to produce this document. 2.1.1 Drought Planning Process The process established for this planning effort is based on the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 planning and update requirements and the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) associated guidance for state hazard mitigation plans. The DTF followed FEMA’s recommended four-step mitigation planning process: 1. Identify and organize available resources 2. Identify hazards and assess risk 3. Develop a mitigation strategy and mitigation plan 4. Implement the Plan and monitor progress The approach also incorporated the following ten step drought planning process developed by Dr. Donald A. Wilhite with the National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC): 1. Appoint a Drought Task Force 2. State the purpose and objectives of the drought preparedness plan 3. Seek stakeholder participation and resolve conflict 4. Inventory resources and identify groups at risk 5. Prepare/write the drought preparedness plan 6. Identify research needs and fill institutional gaps 7. Integrate science and policy (Legislation) 8. Publicize the drought preparedness plan and build public awareness 9. Develop education programs 10. Evaluate and revise drought preparedness plan 2.1.2 Relationship to the State Hazard Mitigation Plan This Plan is considered a drought specific annex to the State of South Dakota Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP). The South Dakota statewide mitigation planning program is designed to coordinate the efforts of many state agencies and organizations in mitigation planning and programming on an ongoing basis. It is also intended to actively promote and coordinate State of South Dakota 2-1 Drought Mitigation Plan November 2015 mitigation planning and programming by local jurisdictions. OEM is the lead agency for the State of South Dakota HMP umbrella document. The original umbrella document was updated in 2007, 2011, and 2013. As the lead agency, OEM regularly coordinates with other agencies on concurrent state planning and risk management efforts. OEM in collaboration with the DTF took the lead on the development of the Drought Plan in 2014-2015, utilizing funding obtained from a FEMA Pre Disaster Mitigation (PDM) planning grant. A consulting firm (AMEC Environment and Infrastructure, subsequently renamed Amec Foster Wheeler heretofore referenced as Amec) was utilized to assist with the development of the Plan, including conducting a detailed vulnerability assessment and facilitation of the mitigation strategy with the DTF. 2.1.3 Drought Task Force The development, implementation, and maintenance
Recommended publications
  • Browse the Canton Magazine
    Welcome to LiveC - Workanton! - Play - Stay! Visit us online at www.CantonSD.org Canton ~ Home • Work • Play Th e Canton Chamber of Commerce, citizens, businesses and the Sioux Valley News welcome you to Canton, a town where you can live, work and play! We invite you to take a few minutes and read through the Canton Visitor and New Resident guide to learn about Canton, South Dakota and the great services, parks, amenities and fun things to do while you are here. Canton, a town of 3,100, is home to hundreds of businesses, a school district that consistently ranks above average in educational markers, a growing and updated infrastructure to support growth and as county seat of Lincoln County, Canton plays an important role in providing services, entertainment, employment and education to residents, visitors and businesses. Th e city of Canton was organized in 1861 when permanent sett lers fi rst came to Canton. Canton is one of the oldest communities in the Dakota Territory. Th e name Canton was business. Th e railroads are still in use today and continue to be critical to chosen because it was believed the town site was located agricultural in Canton. Th e original depot building has been restored and is directly opposite of Canton, China, and organizers thought home to the Canton Visitor Center and Chamber offi ce. Th e center is open the Chinese spelling meant Gateway. Canton was known Monday through Th ursday from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. as Gate City for many years. In 1868, many Norwegian In 2018 a Performing Arts Center, Th e Canton Barn, a wedding destination immigrant families moved to Canton to sett le, which more with a very unique country sett ing, Gate City Events Center and Rental House, than doubled the population of Lincoln County.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Abstracts
    2021 WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA HYDROLOGY CONFERENCE Program and Abstracts April 21–22, 2021 Virtual conference 2021 Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference This program and abstracts book has been produced in conjunction with the virtual 2021 Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference (19th annual). This document provides summaries of the presentations made during the conference, and gives attendees contact information for the presenters for additional questions or collaboration following the conference. The purpose of the Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference is to bring together researchers from Federal, State, University, local government, and private organizations and provide a forum to discuss topics dealing with water, energy, and environmental issues in western South Dakota and the entire upper Great Plains region. This meeting provides an opportunity for hydrologists, geologists, engineers, scientists, geographers, students, and other interested individuals to exchange ideas, discuss mutual problems, and summarize results of studies. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have contributed to this meeting. The presenters are thanked for their contributions and moderators are thanked for their help in streamlining the presentations. The organizing agencies are thanked for support: National Weather Service, RESPEC, South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, U.S. Geological Survey, and West Dakota Water Development District. The chairpersons for this meeting were Melissa Smith (National Weather Service), Lacy Pomarleau (RESPEC), Joanne Noyes (South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources), Scott Kenner (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Liangping Li (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), J. Foster Sawyer (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Arden Davis (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Galen Hoogestraat (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species Through Southeastern
    Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crop Species through Southeastern and Midwestern United States June and July 2007 Glassy Mountain, South Carolina Participants: Kim E. Hummer, Research Leader, Curator, USDA ARS NCGR 33447 Peoria Road, Corvallis, Oregon 97333-2521 phone 541.738.4201 [email protected] Chad E. Finn, Research Geneticist, USDA ARS HCRL, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, Oregon 97330 phone 541.738.4037 [email protected] Michael Dossett Graduate Student, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR 97330 phone 541.738.4038 [email protected] Plant Collecting Expedition for Berry Crops through the Southeastern and Midwestern United States, June and July 2007 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements:................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 4 Part I – Southeastern United States ...................................................................................... 5 Summary.............................................................................................................................. 5 Travelog May-June 2007.................................................................................................... 6 Conclusions for part 1 .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Elwell (Tiber Dam)
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2013 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2014 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2013 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING, AND THE DAKOTAS INTRODUCTION RESERVOIRS UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MONTANA AREA OFFICE SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS DURING WY 2013 ........................................................................................................................ 1 FLOOD BENEFITS...................................................................................................................... 12 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2013 .............................................................. 14 Clark Canyon Reservoir ............................................................................................................ 14 Canyon Ferry Lake and Powerplant ......................................................................................... 21 Helena Valley Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 32 Sun River Project ...................................................................................................................... 34 Gibson Reservoir .................................................................................................................. 34 Pishkun Reservoir ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A 20-Day Inspirational Itinerary
    StateA 20-day inspirational Parks itinerary N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ® MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA WYOMING SOUTH DAKOTA IDAHO COLORADO ITINERARY OVERVIEW TOTAL TRIP*: 4,336 MILES/6,978 KM | 78 HOURS DRIVING ARRIVAL GATEWAY: Denver (DEN) DAY 1: Wyoming (Curt Gowdy) DAY 2: Wyoming (Bear River) DAY 3: Idaho (Bear Lake) DAY 4: Idaho (City of Rocks | Castle Rocks) DAY 5: Idaho (Thousand Springs | Bruneau Dunes) DAY 6: Idaho (Harriman) DAY 7: Montana (Bannack) DAY 8: Montana (Lewis & Clark Caverns | Missouri Headwaters | Madison Buffalo Jump) DAY 9: Montana (Chief Plenty Coups | Pictograph Cave) DAY 10: Montana (Makoshika) DAY 11: North Dakota (Little Missouri State Park) DAY 12: North Dakota (Fort Abraham Lincoln) DAY 13: North Dakota (Lake Sakakawea | Fort Stevenson) DAY 14: North Dakota (Fort Ransom) DAY 15: South Dakota (Palisades) DAY 16: South Dakota (Lewis & Clark Recreation Area) DAY 17: South Dakota (Custer State Park) DAY 18: South Dakota (Custer State Park) DAY 19: Wyoming (Hot Springs State Park) DAY 20: Wyoming (Guernsey State Park | Quebec 01 Missile Alert Facility) DEPARTURE GATEWAY: Denver (DEN) *Drive times and distances are approximate and meant for inspiration only DAY 1: WYOMING CURT GOWDY STATE PARK ACTIVITIES: Recently named as an “Epic” trail system by the International Mountain Bicycling Association, the foothills of the Laramie Mountains offer a stunning setting for any kind of outdoor enthusiast. Separating Cheyenne and Laramie, Curt Gowdy State Park was named for the native Wyomingite and noted sportscaster. The area features granite towers, rocky soils and timbered slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Or Woodland? Reconstructing Past Plant Communities at Good Earth State Park Via Soil Core and Tree Ring Analysis
    Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science, Vol. 94 (2015) 227 PRAIRIE OR WOODLAND? RECONSTRUCTING PAST PLANT COMMUNITIES AT GOOD EARTH STATE PARK VIA SOIL CORE AND TREE RING ANALYSIS Craig N. Spencer1*, Mason D. VanEssen1, Elizabeth A. Renner1, and W. Carter Johnson2 1Biology Department Augustana University Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57197 2Department of Natural Resource Management South Dakota State University Brookings, SD 57007 *Corresponding author email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The hills and ravines of oodG Earth State Park, located in southeastern South Dakota, currently support extensive woodlands interspersed with small upland prairies. Analysis of stable carbon isotopes from soil cores suggests that the prairies were much more extensive in the past and that the woodlands have expanded in recent years. Soil carbon isotope values (δ13C) from forested ravines and upland prairie sites show a strong C4 native grass signature, around -16‰ at the deeper depths, suggesting widespread prairie dominance throughout the park in the past. At the forested sites, δ13C values decreased significantly towards the soil surface reaching average values from -23 to -25‰. Such values are characteristic of C3 woody plants, providing evidence that over time, woodlands have replaced the native prairies. By contrast, soil cores from the few remaining upland prairie sites showed consistent δ13C values from top to bottom, around -16‰, suggesting these sites have remained dominated by prairies for many years. Tree core samples taken from the larger bur oaks (Quercus macrocarpa) at Good Earth yielded maximum ages of approximately 125 years. The apparent absence of older trees in the park is consistent with the stable isotope analysis suggesting that the woodlands at Good Earth have appeared rather recently.
    [Show full text]
  • 390 DISCHARGE at PARTIAL-RECORD STATIONS As
    390 DISCHARGE AT PARTIAL-RECORD STATIONS As the number of streams on which streamflow information is likely to be desired far exceeds the number of stream-gaging stations feasible to operate at one time, the Geological Survey collects limited streamflow data at sites other than stream-gaging stations. When limited streamflow data are collected on a systematic basis over a period of years for use in hydrologic analyses, the site at which the data are collected is called a partial-record station. Data collected at these partial-record stations are usable in low-flow or floodflow analyses, depending on the type of data collected. Crest-stage partial-record stations The following table contains annual maximum discharges for crest-stage stations. A crest-stage gage is a device which will register the peak stage occurring between inspections of the gage. A stage-discharge relation for each gage is developed from discharge measurements made by indirect measurements of peak flow or by current meter. The date of the maximum discharge is not always certain but is usually determined by comparison with nearby continuous-record stations, weather records, or local inquiry. Only the maximum discharge and gage height for each water year are given. Information on some lower floods may have been obtained but is not published herein. The years given in the period of record represent water years for which the annual maximum has been determined. Stations that are noted with “METWARN” are part of a flood-warning system for Rapid City and surrounding area and are equipped with real- time satellite data-collection platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota
    Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 262 Pleistocene Geology of Eastern South Dakota By RICHARD FOSTER FLINT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 262 Prepared as part of the program of the Department of the Interior *Jfor the development-L of*J the Missouri River basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $3 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract_ _ _____-_-_________________--_--____---__ 1 Pre- Wisconsin nonglacial deposits, ______________ 41 Scope and purpose of study._________________________ 2 Stratigraphic sequence in Nebraska and Iowa_ 42 Field work and acknowledgments._______-_____-_----_ 3 Stream deposits. _____________________ 42 Earlier studies____________________________________ 4 Loess sheets _ _ ______________________ 43 Geography.________________________________________ 5 Weathering profiles. __________________ 44 Topography and drainage______________________ 5 Stream deposits in South Dakota ___________ 45 Minnesota River-Red River lowland. _________ 5 Sand and gravel- _____________________ 45 Coteau des Prairies.________________________ 6 Distribution and thickness. ________ 45 Surface expression._____________________ 6 Physical character. _______________ 45 General geology._______________________ 7 Description by localities ___________ 46 Subdivisions. ________-___--_-_-_-______ 9 Conditions of deposition ___________ 50 James River lowland.__________-__-___-_--__ 9 Age and correlation_______________ 51 General features._________-____--_-__-__ 9 Clayey silt. __________________________ 52 Lake Dakota plain____________________ 10 Loveland loess in South Dakota. ___________ 52 James River highlands...-------.-.---.- 11 Weathering profiles and buried soils. ________ 53 Coteau du Missouri..___________--_-_-__-___ 12 Synthesis of pre- Wisconsin stratigraphy.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor Daugaard From: James D
    To: Governor Daugaard From: James D. Hagen, Secretary Department of Tourism Date: November 8, 2011 RE: October 2011 Monthly Status Report By the Numbers For September 2011 over September 2010: • Information Requests – up 31.8% • Web Traffic – up 100.6% (we saw a large increase in web traffic around the time of our monthly Travelsmart e-newsletter) • Tourism Tax (1%) – down 13.4% • Tourism Tax (.5%) – down 19.2% • Gaming Tax – down 5.8% • Hotel Occupancy – down 0.1% • Hotel Overnights – up 0.7% • Hotel Rates – up 2.4% • Domestic Media Circulation – 453,660 and Publicity Value - $5,097 (does not include Buffalo Roundup coverage) Media & Industry Relations Fulfilled information requests and/or gave interviews to Merle Rosenstein, Canadian Traveller, regarding what’s new in South Dakota for their November issue; Matt Poe, Packaged Travel Insider, for article on South Dakota – what’s new, group-friendly businesses, etc. for part of an advertising spread we’re doing; Barbara Soderlin, Rapid City Journal, on shoulder season; Huffington Post regarding some of the best small towns in America – included information on Spearfish, Hill City, Watertown, and Brookings; Randy Mink, Leisure Group Travel, for article on the state; and general inquiries from MediaSD.com and others. Press Releases – To in-state media (posted to www.MediaSD.com and the State News Web): South Dakota’s Great Places series – Sica Hollow State Park and George S. Mickelson Trail; Gearing up for Rooster Rush; and Communities Partnering with Tourism to Promote Pheasant Hunting. Posted one visitor industry release to MediaSD.com – Mount Rushmore National Memorial Announces Cancellation of Fireworks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Spring Wild Turkey Regulations
    2019 SPRING WILD TURKEY REGULATIONS TURN IN POACHERS - TIPS Hotline 1-888-OVERBAG (1-888-683-7224) It is important that you read and understand all regulations before your hunt. The GENERAL RESTRICTIONS following regulations apply to taking, possessing, transporting and storing big game during - No one may hunt big game on interstate highways or controlled access facilities. established seasons. Questions on specific regulations should be directed to the South - No one may discharge a firearm, muzzleloader, crossbow or bow and arrow at Dakota Game, Fish and Parks. any big game animal, except turkey to be taken with a shotgun using shotshells or THE LICENSE with a bow and arrow, from within the right-of-way of an improved public highway. The big game license is an “all-in-one” form. The lower portion is the tag and - No one may hunt big game, except turkey as described above, on a section the upper portion is the license with general information about the licensee. A line or other highway if the right-of-way has been commonly used by the public licensee must carry both portions while hunting the specified season. A licensee for vehicular travel as demonstrated by the existence of a well-worn trail or if an may not take more big game than is allowed by the license or kill a big game intentional alteration has been made to the right-of-way to enhance the natural animal not specifically authorized by the license. The license and tag may not be terrain’s utility for vehicular travel or to permit vehicular travel where it was not transferred and the license must be in the licensee’s possession while hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • 107 Part 208—Flood Control Regulations
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 208.10 PART 208—FLOOD CONTROL sponsible for the efficient operation REGULATIONS and maintenance of all of the struc- tures and facilities during flood periods Sec. and for continuous inspection and 208.10 Local flood protection works; mainte- maintenance of the project works dur- nance and operation of structures and fa- ing periods of low water, all without cilities. cost to the United States. 208.11 Regulations for use of storage allo- (3) A reserve supply of materials cated for flood control or navigation and/ or project operation at reservoirs subject needed during a flood emergency shall to prescription of rules and regulations be kept on hand at all times. by the Secretary of the Army in the in- (4) No encroachment or trespass terest of flood control and navigation. which will adversely affect the effi- 208.19 Marshall Ford Dam and Reservoir cient operation or maintenance of the (Mansfield Dam and Lake Travis), Colo- project works shall be permitted upon rado River, Tex. 208.22 Twin Buttes Dam and Reservoir, Mid- the rights-of-way for the protective fa- dle and South Concho Rivers, Tex. cilities. 208.25 Pensacola Dam and Reservoir, Grand (5) No improvement shall be passed (Neosho) River, Okla. over, under, or through the walls, lev- 208.26 Altus Dam and Reservoir, North Fork ees, improved channels or floodways, Red River, Okla. nor shall any excavation or construc- 208.27 Fort Cobb Dam and Reservoir, Pond (Cobb) Creek, Oklahoma. tion be permitted within the limits of 208.28 Foss Dam and Reservoir, Washita the project right-of-way, nor shall any River, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]