2021 Abstracts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2021 Abstracts 2021 WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA HYDROLOGY CONFERENCE Program and Abstracts April 21–22, 2021 Virtual conference 2021 Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference This program and abstracts book has been produced in conjunction with the virtual 2021 Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference (19th annual). This document provides summaries of the presentations made during the conference, and gives attendees contact information for the presenters for additional questions or collaboration following the conference. The purpose of the Western South Dakota Hydrology Conference is to bring together researchers from Federal, State, University, local government, and private organizations and provide a forum to discuss topics dealing with water, energy, and environmental issues in western South Dakota and the entire upper Great Plains region. This meeting provides an opportunity for hydrologists, geologists, engineers, scientists, geographers, students, and other interested individuals to exchange ideas, discuss mutual problems, and summarize results of studies. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have contributed to this meeting. The presenters are thanked for their contributions and moderators are thanked for their help in streamlining the presentations. The organizing agencies are thanked for support: National Weather Service, RESPEC, South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, U.S. Geological Survey, and West Dakota Water Development District. The chairpersons for this meeting were Melissa Smith (National Weather Service), Lacy Pomarleau (RESPEC), Joanne Noyes (South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources), Scott Kenner (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Liangping Li (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), J. Foster Sawyer (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Arden Davis (South Dakota School of Mines and Technology), Galen Hoogestraat (U.S. Geological Survey), Dan Driscoll (West Dakota Water Development District), and Mark Anderson (U.S. Geological Survey / South Dakota School of Mines and Technology). The West Dakota Water Development District and RESPEC are thanked for being executive sponsors of this conference. Thanks also to sponsors: Citizens' Climate Education, Banner Associates Inc., Black Hills Clean Water Alliance, HDR Engineering Inc., and LRE Water. 2 Promoting sustainability through innovative solutions Featuring world-class scientific and academic leadership, RESPEC is the premier provider of water, environmental, and natural resources engineering and technology in North America. We help clients adapt to the dynamically changing present and prepare for water demands of the future. 2021 WESTERN SOUTH DAKOTA HYDROLOGY CONFERENCE PROGRAM Session 1 – 8:00 – 10:00 AM, Wednesday 4/21/2021 Galen Hoogestraat and Mark Anderson, 8:00 – 8:10 AM Welcome and announcements USGS Brian Walsh, Public Affairs Director, SD 8:10 – 8:30 AM SD Department of Agriculture / DENR Merger Update DANR Overview of West Dakota Water Development District stormwater Dan Driscoll, West Dakota Water 8:30 – 8:50 AM inventory and erosion control projects Development District Pilot Project for an Inventory of Impervious Areas and Green Spaces 8:50 – 9:10 AM Jason Phillips, SDSMT and TerraSite Design that may have Potential for Future Stormwater Mitigation Measures Hydrogeology and Dewatering Scenarios for Summerset, South 9:10 – 9:30 AM Bill Eldridge and Todd Anderson, USGS Dakota Improving the City of Spearfish’s FEMA Floodplain Mapping with 2D 9:30 – 9:50 AM Amber Lefers, AE2S Hydraulic Modeling 9:50 – 10:00 AM BREAK – Sponsor recognition Session 2 – 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM, Wednesday 4/21/2021 Jon Zufelt and Dennis Reep, HDR 10:00 – 10:30 AM Ice-affected flow analyses in the Lower Heart River Levee System Engineering Water-Quality Assessment of the Heart River Basin, North Dakota, 10:30 – 10:50 AM Wyatt Tatge, USGS 1970-2019 The LaPrele Dam Project, Douglas, WY: Project History, Investigation Peter Rausch, RESPEC, and Cory Foreman, 10:50 – 11:20 AM and Design Options HDR Engineering An update of surface and subsurface geological mapping, Mike Wiles, Erin Dundas, and Sierra Heimel 11:20 – 11:40 AM potentiometric map, and flow directions in the Madison aquifer Jewel Cave National Monument at Jewel Cave National Monument Modeling transport and retention of graphene oxide in biochar media Md Sazadul Hasan, Venkataramana 11:40 – 12:00 PM under subsurface aquatic environment Gadhamshetty, and Mengistu Geza, SDSMT 4 Session 3 – 8:00 – 10:00 AM, Thursday 4/22/2021 8:00 – 8:05 AM Welcome and announcements Lacy Pomarleau, RESPEC Tim Cowman Impacts of Sedimentation on Missouri River Reservoirs and Free- 8:05 – 8:30 AM South Dakota DANR; Geological Survey Flowing Segments Program Analysis of Potential Alternative Operations for Pactola and Deerfield David Waterman and Rosemary Squillace, 8:30 – 8:50 AM Reservoirs SDSMT Hydraulic Analysis of Fish Habitat Restoration of Rapid Creek Anne Winckel, SDSMT and RESPEC, and 8:50 – 9:10 AM Downstream of Pactola Reservoir Scott Kenner, SDSMT Examining the Influence of Climate Change on Stream Yield in the Lucas Graunke, Lisa Kunza, William 9:10 – 9:30 AM Black Hills of South Dakota Capehart, and Mengistu Nisrani, SDSMT Characterization of Factors Affecting Groundwater Levels in and near 9:30 – 9:50 AM the Rosebud Indian Reservation and the Former Lake Traverse Indian Kristen Valseth, USGS Reservation, 1956-2017 9:50 – 10:00 AM BREAK – Sponsor recognition Session 4 – 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM, Thursday 4/22/2021 Mesonet Monitoring of Soil Moisture and Snowpack Monitoring in the Nathan Edwards, South Dakota State 10:00 – 10:20 AM Upper Missouri River Basin University – South Dakota Mesonet 10:20 – 10:50 AM From the Ground Up - Managing Water for Quality and Quantity John McMaine, South Dakota State University Fleford Redoloza, Tanja Williamson, and 10:50 – 11:10 AM Image Segmentation of Tile Drainage Systems Using U-Nets Alex Headman, USGS Investigation of Muskingum Routing parameters in natural channel in Vida Atashi and Yeo Lim, University of North 11:10 – 11:30 AM North Dakotan river under snowmelt-induced flooding conditions Dakota 11:30 – 12:00 PM Improving Water quality with the Scenario Application Manager (SAM) Seth Kenner, RESPEC 5 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 21, 2021 SESSION 1 8:00 – 10:00 A.M. 6 SD DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE / DENR MERGER UPDATE Brian Walsh Public Affairs Director, SD Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources [email protected] OVERVIEW OF WEST DAKOTA WATER DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT "STORMWATER-INVENTORY" AND "EROSION-CONTROL" PROJECTS Dan Driscoll Area 3 Director, West Dakota Water Development District [email protected] During 2020 the West Dakota Water Development District implemented two projects that aim to improve water-quality and ecological conditions in Rapid Creek. Rapid Creek often fails to meet designated water-quality standards for total suspended solids during periods of urban stormwater runoff, which is widely recognized as a common cause for exceedance of water-quality standards. Both projects were implemented as partnerships with the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at South Dakota Mines. The stormwater-inventory project, which has essentially been completed, was implemented as a pilot-level effort within 3 of Rapid City’s 27 named urban drainage basins. The primary goal was to develop methods for identifying non-residential properties where future improvements in stormwater management might be accomplished with minimal effort and cost. Such properties typically were developed before the advent of modern stormwater best management practices. Good candidates for future improvements might include properties with relatively large impervious surfaces and available green space well suited for stormwater mitigation. The erosion-control project also was implemented as a pilot-level effort and has a purpose of testing methods for slope stabilization through revegetation in challenging settings where highly erosive soils are present. The end goal is to achieve water-quality improvement by reducing erosion and associated sedimentation within the downstream receiving water body. The project area consists of about 2 acres of exposed weathered shale on a steep slope on the west side of the South Dakota Mines campus. Many other large areas with actively eroding shales exist within the South Dakota Mines campus and on slopes surrounding the “Star Village” and “Hillcrest” housing units to the west, where future erosion-control projects might be considered. 7 PILOT PROJECT FOR AN INVENTORY OF IMPERVIOUS AREAS AND GREEN SPACES THAT MAY HAVE POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES Jason Phillips South Dakota Mines and TerraSite Design [email protected] [email protected] Urban stormwater runoff is a detrimental factor to the water quality and ecology of Rapid Creek within the urban/suburban corridor. It also contributes to increased flash flooding because existing infrastructure can’t handle the increased runoff generated from the increased impervious land cover. The use of modern stormwater best management practices (BMPs), that incorporate green infrastructure (GI), can be quite effective in mitigating detrimental effects of stormwater runoff; however, much of Rapid City’s urbanization occurred before the advent of effective stormwater BMPs. A comprehensive large scale program to “retrofit” all areas within the Rapid City vicinity lacking adequate stormwater infrastructure
Recommended publications
  • Lake Elwell (Tiber Dam)
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2013 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2014 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2013 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING, AND THE DAKOTAS INTRODUCTION RESERVOIRS UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MONTANA AREA OFFICE SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS DURING WY 2013 ........................................................................................................................ 1 FLOOD BENEFITS...................................................................................................................... 12 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2013 .............................................................. 14 Clark Canyon Reservoir ............................................................................................................ 14 Canyon Ferry Lake and Powerplant ......................................................................................... 21 Helena Valley Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 32 Sun River Project ...................................................................................................................... 34 Gibson Reservoir .................................................................................................................. 34 Pishkun Reservoir ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 390 DISCHARGE at PARTIAL-RECORD STATIONS As
    390 DISCHARGE AT PARTIAL-RECORD STATIONS As the number of streams on which streamflow information is likely to be desired far exceeds the number of stream-gaging stations feasible to operate at one time, the Geological Survey collects limited streamflow data at sites other than stream-gaging stations. When limited streamflow data are collected on a systematic basis over a period of years for use in hydrologic analyses, the site at which the data are collected is called a partial-record station. Data collected at these partial-record stations are usable in low-flow or floodflow analyses, depending on the type of data collected. Crest-stage partial-record stations The following table contains annual maximum discharges for crest-stage stations. A crest-stage gage is a device which will register the peak stage occurring between inspections of the gage. A stage-discharge relation for each gage is developed from discharge measurements made by indirect measurements of peak flow or by current meter. The date of the maximum discharge is not always certain but is usually determined by comparison with nearby continuous-record stations, weather records, or local inquiry. Only the maximum discharge and gage height for each water year are given. Information on some lower floods may have been obtained but is not published herein. The years given in the period of record represent water years for which the annual maximum has been determined. Stations that are noted with “METWARN” are part of a flood-warning system for Rapid City and surrounding area and are equipped with real- time satellite data-collection platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • 107 Part 208—Flood Control Regulations
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 208.10 PART 208—FLOOD CONTROL sponsible for the efficient operation REGULATIONS and maintenance of all of the struc- tures and facilities during flood periods Sec. and for continuous inspection and 208.10 Local flood protection works; mainte- maintenance of the project works dur- nance and operation of structures and fa- ing periods of low water, all without cilities. cost to the United States. 208.11 Regulations for use of storage allo- (3) A reserve supply of materials cated for flood control or navigation and/ or project operation at reservoirs subject needed during a flood emergency shall to prescription of rules and regulations be kept on hand at all times. by the Secretary of the Army in the in- (4) No encroachment or trespass terest of flood control and navigation. which will adversely affect the effi- 208.19 Marshall Ford Dam and Reservoir cient operation or maintenance of the (Mansfield Dam and Lake Travis), Colo- project works shall be permitted upon rado River, Tex. 208.22 Twin Buttes Dam and Reservoir, Mid- the rights-of-way for the protective fa- dle and South Concho Rivers, Tex. cilities. 208.25 Pensacola Dam and Reservoir, Grand (5) No improvement shall be passed (Neosho) River, Okla. over, under, or through the walls, lev- 208.26 Altus Dam and Reservoir, North Fork ees, improved channels or floodways, Red River, Okla. nor shall any excavation or construc- 208.27 Fort Cobb Dam and Reservoir, Pond (Cobb) Creek, Oklahoma. tion be permitted within the limits of 208.28 Foss Dam and Reservoir, Washita the project right-of-way, nor shall any River, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • 41:07:03:03. Daily, Possession, and Length Limit Restrictions on Special Management Waters -- Additional Restrictions Described
    41:07:03:03. Daily, possession, and length limit restrictions on special management waters -- Additional restrictions described. Daily limit, possession limit, length limit, and additional restrictions on special management waters are described as follows: (1) Catfish may be taken without limit on the Grand, Moreau, Cheyenne, Belle Fourche, Bad, White, and Little Missouri Rivers; and in the inland waters of the Missouri River and its impoundments; (2) In the waters of Lake Alvin and Nine Mile Creek from the Lake Alvin Dam to the Sioux River in Lincoln County, Lake Campbell in Campbell County, Murdo City Lake, Murdo Railroad Lake, and Richland Dam in Jones County, Sheridan Lake in Pennington County, Lake Hiddenwood in Walworth County, Lake Menno in Hutchinson County, Lake Mitchell in Davison County, Firesteel Creek above Lake Mitchell to Davison County Road No. 12 (Loomis Oil), Wilmarth Lake in Aurora County, Marindahl Lake and Lake Yankton in Yankton County, Tripp Lake in Hutchinson County, Rosehill Lake and Jones Lake in Hand County, Durkee Lake and Curlew Lake in Meade County, Burke Lake in Gregory County, Simon Lake in Potter County, Corsica Lake in Douglas County, Richmond Lake in Brown County, Lake Henry and East and West Heritage GPA ponds in Bon Homme County, and McCook Lake in Union County, New Underwood Lake in Pennington County, Stockade Lake and Bismarck Lake in Custer County, the minimum length limit for largemouth and smallmouth bass is 15 inches; (3) In New Wall Dam in Pennington County, Newell Lake in Butte County, and
    [Show full text]
  • Boysen Reservoir and Powerplant
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2015 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2016 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2015 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING, AND THE DAKOTAS INTRODUCTION RESERVOIRS UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MONTANA AREA OFFICE SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS DURING WY 2015 ........................................................................................................................ 1 FLOOD BENEFITS ...................................................................................................................... 13 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2015 .............................................................. 15 Clark Canyon Reservoir ............................................................................................................ 15 Canyon Ferry Lake and Powerplant .......................................................................................... 21 Helena Valley Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 32 Sun River Project ...................................................................................................................... 34 Gibson Reservoir ................................................................................................................... 34 Pishkun Reservoir ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 South Dakota Drought Mitigation Plan 2015
    SOUTH DAKOTA DROUGHT MITIGATION PLAN November 2015 Prepared by the South Dakota Drought Task Force In partnership with the South Dakota Office of Emergency Management Department of Public Safety South Dakota Drought Mitigation Plan November 2015 Prepared by the South Dakota Drought Task Force In partnership with the South Dakota Office of Emergency Management Department of Public Safety With professional planning assistance from Amec Foster Wheeler, Inc. Table of Contents 1 PREREQUISITE .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Adoption ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 2 PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Description of the Planning Process ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Coordination among Agencies .................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Program Integration .................................................................................................... 2-8 3 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT .................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Identifying the Drought Hazard .................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Drought Hazard Profile ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 06-02-1972 Rapid City SD – Carter – Tank – Summers -3 Ffs Flood Rescue Dam Fail
    06-02-1972 Rapid City SD – Carter – Tank – Summers -3 FFs Flood Rescue Dam Fail RAPID CITY FIRE DEPT. https://penningtoncountyemergency.wordpress.com/2015/06/09/remembering- the-flood-of-1972/ Then: 1972 Fire Chief Ken Johnson 71 responding personnel 3 Sub-stations, (Stations 3, 4, & 7) 3 Firefighters lost in the flood, Capt. George Carter, Lt. Henry “Hank” Tank, George “Ike” Sumners Now: 2012 https://penningtoncountyemergency.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/newspaper- june-26-pd-and-fd1.jpg PSDiver Magazine www.PSDiver.com Page 1 https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1241&dat=19720612&id=Rm9TAAAAIBAJ&sjid=8IUDAAAAIB AJ&pg=5474,5031249&hl=en PSDiver Magazine www.PSDiver.com Page 2 Historical Vignette: The Rapid City Flood, June 1972 http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Media/Fact-Sheets/Fact-Sheet-Article- View/Article/581806/historical-vignette-the-rapid-city-flood-june-1972/ The Rapid City Flood, June 1972 The citizens of Rapid City, South Dakota, thought of their visitors and themselves when they won Works Progress Administration funding in the 1930's to build Canyon Lake Dam on Rapid Creek. The 1,000-foot-long dam was built on the edge of the city. With a 70-foot base and 30-foot crown, the 20-foot-high dam backed up a 40-acre lake for recreation. The lake was great for fishing and boating, but the dam's 3.5-foot free-board was inadequate for containment of any substantial flood. Courtesy Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., Rapid City. Graphic Restoration by Al Barrus As Rapid City grew, so did the need for drinking water.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2017 Summary of Actual
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2017 Summary of Actual Operations U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2017 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING AND THE DAKOTAS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... iv MONTANA AREA OFFICE WY 2017 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 October through December ......................................................................................................... 1 January through March ............................................................................................................... 8 April through June .................................................................................................................... 10 July through September ............................................................................................................ 13 FLOOD BENEFITS...................................................................................................................... 16 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2017 .............................................................. 19 Clark Canyon Reservoir ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, Dod § 208.11
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 208.11 § 208.11 Regulations for use of storage the interest of flood control and navi- allocated for flood control or navi- gation as follows: gation and/or project operation at reservoirs subject to prescription of The operation and maintenance of the rules and regulations by the Sec- dams shall be subject to reasonable rules and retary of the Army in the interest of regulations of the Secretary of the Army in flood control and navigation. the interest of flood control and navigation. NOTE: This Regulation will also be applica- (a) Purpose. This regulation pre- ble to dam and reservoir projects operated scribes the responsibilities and general under provisions of future legislative acts procedures for regulating reservoir wherein the Secretary of the Army is di- projects capable of regulation for flood rected to prescribe rules and regulations in the interest of flood control and navigation. control or navigation and the use of The Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of storage allocated for such purposes and Engineers, is designated the duly authorized provided on the basis of flood control representative of the Secretary of the Army and navigation, except projects owned to exercise the authority set out in the Con- and operated by the Corps of Engi- gressional Acts. This Regulation will nor- neers; the International Boundary and mally be implemented by letters of under- Water Commission, United States and standing between the Corps of Engineers and project owner and will incorporate the provi- Mexico; and those under the jurisdic- sions of such letters of understanding prior tion of the International Joint Com- to the time construction renders the project mission, United States, and Canada, capable of significant impoundment of and the Columbia River Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Valley Project History
    Rapid Valley Project Christopher J. McCune Bureau of Reclamation 2001 Table of Contents The Rapid Valley Project........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History .....................................................9 Post-Construction History................................................15 Settlement of the Project .................................................20 Uses of Project Water ...................................................20 Conclusion............................................................21 About The Author ............................................................21 Bibliography ................................................................22 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................22 Government Documents .................................................22 Books ................................................................22 Newspapers ...........................................................23 Journal Articles ........................................................23 Websites..............................................................23 Index ......................................................................24 1 The Rapid Valley Project As the 20th century progressed, the Bureau of Reclamation began focusing
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT of AX Evapomtiobi Flap for Tlic STATE of \NO?IING for PURPOSES of ESTIMATING EVAPORATION and EVAPOTRRNSPIRATION Larr
    DEVELOPMENT OF AX EVAPOMTIObi FlAP FOR TlIC STATE OF \NO?IING FOR PURPOSES OF ESTIMATING EVAPORATION AND EVAPOTRRNSPIRATION bY Larry Eugene Lewis A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and The Graduate School oE the University of Vyoming in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the degree of IIas ter of Science University of \Jyoming Laramie, Wyoming Play, 1975 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my appreciation to my wife, Melanie, with- out whose support and understanding I would never have been able to complete my graduate studies. I would also like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. Victor Hasfurther for his invaluable guidance and time. My thanks also to Mr. Paul Rechard for his many suggestions and guidance, and to Dr. Robert Burman, the third member of my Graduate Committee. Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of the Interior, Contract No. R-805185-01-0, acting by and through the Wyoming Water Resources Research Institute. Lewis, Larry E., -_ Devclojment of an Evaporation Nap for the State of b&orning for Purposes of Estimating Evaporation arid Evapotranspiration, N.S., Department of Civil Engin- eering, >lay 1978. Thesis directed by Dr. Victor Hasfurther. This thesis uses May through September Class A pan evaporation values to develop Average Annual Class A pan evaporation, and Average Annual Lake Evaporation maps for the State of IJyominp,. These maps arc then available for use in estimating evaporation and seasonal evapo- transpiration values for water resource studies in the State of Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Index a B C Index
    INDEX INDEX 481 A Big Sioux River, at Klondike, IA . 422 Aberdeen, Foot Creek near . 300–301, 457 at Lake Kampeska, near Watertown . 401 Moccasin Creek at . 298–299, 457 at North Cliff Avenue, at Sioux Falls. 362–372, 464 Access to USGS water data . 23 at North Sioux City, IA . 429 Akron, IA, Big Sioux River at . 378–380, 465 at Watertown . 336–337, 461 Angostura Dam, Cheyenne River below . 72–73, 433 below diversion, at Sioux Falls . 403 Angostura Reservoir near Hot Springs . 70 below wastewater effluent, near Brookings . 470 Annie Creek near Lead . 150–151, 444 below wastewater effluent, near Watertown . 470 Antelope Creek, near Langford (James River Basin) . 398, 457 below wastewater wetland, near Volga . 470 near Mission (Niobrara River Basin) . 397, 455 below Watertown . 340–341, 462 Ashton, James River at . 304–305, 458 diversion at North Drive, at Sioux Falls. 471 Aurora Center, East Fork Platte Creek near . 397, 454 downstream Sioux Falls wastewater discharge, Avon, Choteau Creek near . 397, 455 at Sioux Falls . 471 near Brandon . 421 B near Broken Kettle, IA . 428 Bad River, near Fort Pierre. 206–210 near Brookings . 346–347, 463 near Midland. 204, 449 near Bruce . 344–345, 462 Battle Creek, above Keystone. 387, 435 near Canton . 423 at Hermosa . 88–89, 436 near Castlewood . 342–343, 462 below Hermosa. 90–91, 436 near Dell Rapids . 348–356, 463 near Keystone . 84–85, 435 near Florence . 330–331, 461 Beadle County, ground-water levels in. 472 near Renner . 471 Bear Butte Creek, near Deadwood . 190–191, 448 near Richland .
    [Show full text]