National United States of America
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report
l 122 EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL ASPECTS OPEN FILE REPORT 92-2 EARTHQUAKES AND Ludwin, R. S.; Malone, S. D.; Crosson, R. EARTHQUAKES AND SEISMOLOGY - LEGAL S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Washington SEISMOLOGY - 1946 EVENT ASPECTS eanhquak:es, 1985. Clague, J. J., 1989, Research on eanh- Ludwin, R. S.; Qamar, A. I., 1991, Reeval Perkins, J. B.; Moy, Kenneth, 1989, Llabil quak:e-induced ground failures in south uation of the 19th century Washington ity of local government for earthquake western British Columbia [abstract). and Oregon eanhquake catalog using hazards and losses-A guide to the law Evans, S. G., 1989, The 1946 Mount Colo original accounts-The moderate sized and its impacts in the States of Califor nel Foster rock avalanches and auoci earthquake of May l, 1882 [abstract). nia, Alaska, Utah, and Washington; ated displacement wave, Vancouver Is Final repon. Maley, Richard, 1986, Strong motion accel land, British Columbia. erograph stations in Oregon and Wash Hasegawa, H. S.; Rogers, G. C., 1978, EARTHQUAKES AND ington (April 1986). Appendix C Quantification of the magnitude 7.3, SEISMOLOGY - NETWORKS Malone, S. D., 1991, The HAWK seismic British Columbia earthquake of June 23, AND CATALOGS data acquisition and analysis system 1946. [abstract). Berg, J. W., Jr.; Baker, C. D., 1963, Oregon Hodgson, E. A., 1946, British Columbia eanhquak:es, 1841 through 1958 [ab Milne, W. G., 1953, Seismological investi earthquake, June 23, 1946. gations in British Columbia (abstract). stract). Hodgson, J. H.; Milne, W. G., 1951, Direc Chan, W.W., 1988, Network and array anal Munro, P. S.; Halliday, R. J.; Shannon, W. -
Floods in North and South Dakota Frequency and Magnitude
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS IN NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA FREQUENCY AND MAGNITUDE By John A. McCabe and Orlo A. Crosby Prepared in cooperation with the NORTH DAKOTA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT AND THE SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Open-file report Bismarck, North Dakota May 1959 DEC 15 1967 PREFACE This report was prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the North Dakota State Highway Department and the South Dakota Department of Highways. The work was performed under the supervision of H. M. Erskine. District Engineer, Surface Water Branch. Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey. The authors were assisted by R. E. West. Advice and review were furnished by the Floods Section. Surface Water Branch, Washington. D. C. The streamflow records used in this report were collected and compiled by the U. S. Geological Survey co operating with the following agencies: the North Dakota State Engineer and State Water Conservation Commission; pthe South Dakota State Engineer, State Geologist. State Fish and Game Commission, and State Water Resources Commission; the Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army; the Department of State; the Bureau of Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; the Soil Conservation Service, Department of Agriculture; and others. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract. .................. 1 Gaging-station records--Continued Introduction ................. 1 Red River of the North basin--Continued Description of the area .......... 1 Sheyenne River at West Fargo, Physiography ............ 1 N. Dak. (13). ........... 41 Climate ............... 1 Maple River at Mapleton, N. Dak. (14) . 42 Causes of floods ............. 1 Rush River at Amenia, N. -
Section 5.4.3: Risk Assessment – Flood
SECTION 5.4.3: RISK ASSESSMENT – FLOOD 5.4.3 FLOOD This section provides a profile and vulnerability assessment for the flood hazard. HAZARD PROFILE This section provides hazard profile information including description, extent, location, previous occurrences and losses and the probability of future occurrences. Description Floods are one of the most common natural hazards in the U.S. They can develop slowly over a period of days or develop quickly, with disastrous effects that can be local (impacting a neighborhood or community) or regional (affecting entire river basins, coastlines and multiple counties or states) (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA], 2006). Most communities in the U.S. have experienced some kind of flooding, after spring rains, heavy thunderstorms, coastal storms, or winter snow thaws (George Washington University, 2001). Floods are the most frequent and costly natural hazards in New York State in terms of human hardship and economic loss, particularly to communities that lie within flood prone areas or flood plains of a major water source. The FEMA definition for flooding is “a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of two or more acres of normally dry land area or of two or more properties from the overflow of inland or tidal waters or the rapid accumulation of runoff of surface waters from any source (FEMA, Date Unknown).” The New York State Disaster Preparedness Commission (NYSDPC) and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) indicates that flooding could originate from one -
Geologic Map of South Dakota
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA M. Michael Rounds, Governor DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Steven M. Pirner, Secretary DIVISION OF FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE David Templeton, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Derric L. Iles, State Geologist Geologic Map of South Dakota James E. Martin, J. Foster Sawyer, Mark D. Fahrenbach, Dennis W. Tomhave, Layne D. Schulz 2004 References to Accompany General Map 10 Agnew, A.F., 1957, Areal geology of the White River quadrangle: South Dakota Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map, scale 1:62,500. ____1963, Geology of the Mission quadrangle: South Dakota Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map, scale 1:62,500. Agnew, A.F., and Tychsen, P.C., 1965, A guide to the stratigraphy of South Dakota: South Dakota Geological Survey Bulletin 14, 195 p. Alkhazmi, R.A., 1973, Structural analysis of the Precambrian rocks of the Park Dome area, Custer County, Black Hills of South Dakota: Rapid City, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, M.S. thesis, 92 p. Anna, L.O., 1973, Geology of the Kirk Hill area, Lawrence-Meade Counties, South Dakota: Rapid City, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, M.S. thesis, 47 p. Atkinson, R.D., 1976, Geology of the Pony Gulch area near Mystic, South Dakota: Rapid City, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, M.S. thesis, 21 p. Baird, J.D., 1957, Geology of the Alcester quadrangle, South Dakota–Iowa: Vermillion, University of South Dakota, M.A. thesis, 136 p. Baker, C.L., 1948, The Pennington-Haakon County central boundary area with general discussion of its surroundings: South Dakota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 64, 29 p. -
Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft Environmental Assessment
Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft Environmental Assessment U.S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration DOE/EA-2016 July 2016 Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft Environmental Assessment Butte County, South Dakota U.S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration DOE/EA-2016 July 2016 Willow Creek Wind Energy Facility Draft EA Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Western’s Purpose and Need ............................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Wind Quarry’s Goals and Objectives .................................................................. 1-3 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND NO ACTION ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Western’s Proposed Action.................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 Willow Creek Wind Farm ..................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Project Life Cycle ................................................................................. 2-6 2.2 No Action Alternative .......................................................................................... 2-6 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Land Cover and Land Use .................................................................................. -
North Pacific Research Board Project Final Report
NORTH PACIFIC RESEARCH BOARD PROJECT FINAL REPORT Synthesis of Marine Biology and Oceanography of Southeast Alaska NPRB Project 406 Final Report Ginny L. Eckert1, Tom Weingartner2, Lisa Eisner3, Jan Straley4, Gordon Kruse5, and John Piatt6 1 Biology Program, University of Alaska Southeast, and School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 11120 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801, (907) 796-6450, [email protected] 2 Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks, P.O. Box 757220, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220, (907) 474-7993, [email protected] 3 Auke Bay Lab, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 17109 Pt. Lena Loop Rd., Juneau, AK 99801, (907) 789-6602, [email protected] 4 University of Alaska Southeast, 1332 Seward Ave., Sitka, AK 99835, (907) 774-7779, [email protected] 5 School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 11120 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801, (907) 796-2052, [email protected] 6 Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK, 360-774-0516, [email protected] August 2007 ABSTRACT This project directly responds to NPRB specific project needs, “Bring Southeast Alaska scientific background up to the status of other Alaskan waters by completing a synthesis of biological and oceanographic information”. This project successfully convened a workshop on March 30-31, 2005 at the University of Alaska Southeast to bring together representatives from different marine science disciplines and organizations to synthesize information on the marine biology and oceanography of Southeast Alaska. Thirty-eight individuals participated, including representatives of the University of Alaska and state and national agencies. -
Communities Investing in the Future One Happy Camper at a Time
COMMUNITIES INVESTING IN THE FUTURE ONE HAPPY CAMPER AT A TIME To date, the Foundation for Jewish Camp partners with 41 communities* including Foundation for Jewish Camp the PJ Library, in addition 253 West 35th Street to four national camp move- 4th Floor ments and over 30 camps New York, NY 10001 to offer the One Happy tel 646-278-4546 Camper program. fax 646-278-4501 *as of September 1, 2015 www.jewishcamp.org Dear Friend of Jewish Camp, Jewish summer camps provide extraordinary laboratories for Jewish Foundation for Jewish Camp was created in 1998 as a public education, expression, and growth. Though appearing as fun and foundation dedicated to Jewish overnight camp, thanks to the games, camps create intentional and purposeful communities with leadership and vision of Robert and Elisa Spungen Bildner. robust and diverse ways for young children, teens, young adults, Over the past 18 years, the Foundation for Jewish Camp has parents, and staff to connect to Jewish life in a powerful and professionalized the field, expanded access to and intensified meaningful way. demand for camp and offered professional development programs for camp staff, elevating the level of programming at North Simply stated, Jewish camp works. To secure stronger Jewish American camps across the Jewish spectrum. communities in the future, we must invest in strengthening Jewish camps today. With your hard work and partnership, we aspire to ensure that every Jewish child benefits from immersive Jewish Today, the Foundation for Jewish Camp serves over 155 Jewish summer experiences. summer camps, close to 80,000 campers and 11,000 counselors across North America every summer. -
Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C
Imagining Outer Space Also by Alexander C. T. Geppert FLEETING CITIES Imperial Expositions in Fin-de-Siècle Europe Co-Edited EUROPEAN EGO-HISTORIES Historiography and the Self, 1970–2000 ORTE DES OKKULTEN ESPOSIZIONI IN EUROPA TRA OTTO E NOVECENTO Spazi, organizzazione, rappresentazioni ORTSGESPRÄCHE Raum und Kommunikation im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert NEW DANGEROUS LIAISONS Discourses on Europe and Love in the Twentieth Century WUNDER Poetik und Politik des Staunens im 20. Jahrhundert Imagining Outer Space European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century Edited by Alexander C. T. Geppert Emmy Noether Research Group Director Freie Universität Berlin Editorial matter, selection and introduction © Alexander C. T. Geppert 2012 Chapter 6 (by Michael J. Neufeld) © the Smithsonian Institution 2012 All remaining chapters © their respective authors 2012 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2012 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. -
Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019
Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019 South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Wildlife Division Gene Galinat Greg Simpson Bill Miller Jake Davis Michelle Bucholz John Carreiro Dylan Jones Stan Michals Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams, 2015-2019 Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 II. Resource Descriptions ........................................................................................................... 4 Black Hills Fish Management Area ...................................................................................... 4 III. Management of Black Hills Fish Management Area Stream Fisheries ...................... 7 Classification of Trout Streams ............................................................................................. 7 Regulations .............................................................................................................................. 7 Stocking .................................................................................................................................... 8 Fish Surveys ............................................................................................................................ 8 Angler Surveys ........................................................................................................................ 9 Habitat and Angler Access ................................................................................................... -
Expedition Black Hills Option B1
Medicine Mountain Scout Ranch 24201 Bobcat Road Custer, South Dakota 57730 Expedition: Black Hills Option B1 - 3 Day Program Destinations Include: • Mammoth Site • Black Elk Peak (Formerly Harney Peak) • Wind Cave National Park • Sylvan Lake • Mount Rushmore • Crazy Horse Memorial & Laser Light Show • 1880 Train • The Alpine Inn If after reading this overview, you have any questions, please contact our friendly team at 605-342-2824 or send an email to [email protected]. EXPEDITION: BLACK HILLS Key Info: Option Number B1 Tour Length Monday - Wednesday or Wednesday - Friday (3 days) Cost Per Person $380.00 (estimated - Call for exact pricing) Day 1 Destinations in this Option 6:45AM Breakfast in Campsite 8:00AM Depart Camp Mammoth Site 9:30AM Mammoth Site For centuries the bones lay buried, until 12:00PM Sack Lunch at Mammoth Site discovered by chance in 1974 during excavating 1:00PM Wind Cave National Park for a housing development, when earth moving 5:00PM Dinner in Campsite equipment exposed South Dakota’s greatest 7:00PM - 9:00PM Open Program at Camp fossil treasure. Fortunately, through the work of Day 2 local citizens, the Mammoth Site was preserved. 6:45AM Breakfast in Campsite Today it is the world’s largest Columbian 8:00AM Depart Camp mammoth exhibit, and a world-renown 9:00AM Mount Rushmore research center for Pleistocene. 12:00PM Sack Lunch at Mount Rushmore 1:15PM 1880 Train Wind Cave National Park 5:00PM Dinner in Campsite A hidden world beneath the prairie… 7:00PM - 9:00PM Open Program at Camp Bison, elk, and other wildlife roam the rolling Day 3 prairie grasslands and forested hillsides of one 6:45AM Breakfast in Campsite of America’s oldest national parks. -
Black Elk Peak Mobile Scanning Customers & Services Definitive Elevation Bringing the Goods TRUE ELEVATION BLACK ELK PEAK » JERRY PENRY, PS
MAY 2017 AROUND THE BEND Survey Economics Black Elk Peak Mobile Scanning Customers & services Definitive elevation Bringing the goods TRUE ELEVATION BLACK ELK PEAK » JERRY PENRY, PS Displayed with permission • The American Surveyor • May 2017 • Copyright 2017 Cheves Media • www.Amerisurv.com lack Elk Peak, located in the Black Hills region of South Dakota, is the state’s highest natural point. It is frequently referred to as the highest summit in the United States east of the Rocky BMountains. Two other peaks, Guadalupe Peak in Texas and Sierra Blanca Peak in New Mexico, are higher and also east of the Continental Divide, but they are P. Tuttle used a Green’s mercury barometer, one of the considered south of the Rockies. best instruments of the time to determine elevations on The famed Black Elk Peak was known as Harney high peaks. Tuttle coordinated his measurements with Peak as early as 1855 in honor of General William S. simultaneous readings at the Union Pacific Railroad Harney. This designation lasted for more than 160 depot in Cheyenne, Wyo. The difference between the two years, but the peak was renamed Black Elk Peak on barometer readings, when added to the known sea level August 11, 2016, by the U. S. Board of Geographic elevation at Cheyenne, resulted in elevations of 7369.4’ Names to honor medicine man Black Elk of the Oglala and 7368.4’, varying greatly from the 9700’ elevation Lakota (Sioux). The two names are synonymously used previously obtained by Ludlow. in this article as the same peak. The elevation results of the Newton-Jenney The first attempt to accurately measure the elevation of Expedition were not published until 1880 due to the Black Elk Peak was in 1874 during the Custer Expedition. -
Go for Lunar Landing Conference Report
CONFERENCE REPORT Sponsored by: REPORT OF THE GO FOR LUNAR LANDING: FROM TERMINAL DESCENT TO TOUCHDOWN CONFERENCE March 4-5, 2008 Fiesta Inn, Tempe, AZ Sponsors: Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary Institute University of Arizona Report Editors: William Gregory Wayne Ottinger Mark Robinson Harrison Schmitt Samuel J. Lawrence, Executive Editor Organizing Committee: William Gregory, Co-Chair, Honeywell International Wayne Ottinger, Co-Chair, NASA and Bell Aerosystems, retired Roberto Fufaro, University of Arizona Kip Hodges, Arizona State University Samuel J. Lawrence, Arizona State University Wendell Mendell, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Clive Neal, University of Notre Dame Charles Oman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Rice, Arizona State University Mark Robinson, Arizona State University Cindy Ryan, Arizona State University Harrison H. Schmitt, NASA, retired Rick Shangraw, Arizona State University Camelia Skiba, Arizona State University Nicolé A. Staab, Arizona State University i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 Notes...............................................................................................................................3 THE APOLLO EXPERIENCE............................................................................................4 Panelists...........................................................................................................................4