DOCSLIB.ORG

Species List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species List The species collected in your Malaise trap are listed below. They are organized by group and are listed in the order of the 'Species Image Library'. ‘New’ refers to species that are brand new to our DNA barcode library. 'Rare' refers to species that were only collected in your trap out of all 67 that were deployed for the program. BIN Group (Scientific Name) Species Common Name Scientific Name New Rare BOLD:AAB5726 Spiders (Araneae) Grass spider Agelenopsis potteri BOLD:AAD6926 Spiders (Araneae) Ghost spider Anyphaena pectorosa BOLD:AAH0002 Spiders (Araneae) Sheetweb spider Tapinocyba hortensis BOLD:AAN9005 Spiders (Araneae) Running crab spider Philodromus minutus BOLD:ACX7149 Spiders (Araneae) Running crab spider Philodromus minutus BOLD:AAI4346 Harvestmen (Opiliones) Harvestman Phalangiidae BOLD:AAU6970 Beetles (Coleoptera) Checkered beetle Enoclerus nigripes BOLD:AAH0130 Beetles (Coleoptera) Clover weevil Sitona hispidulus BOLD:ACP9027 Beetles (Coleoptera) Click beetle Aeolus BOLD:AAN6154 Beetles (Coleoptera) Minute brown scavenger beetle Melanophthalma inermis BOLD:AAN6148 Beetles (Coleoptera) False metallic wood-boring beetle Trixagus carinicollis BOLD:AAU6966 Beetles (Coleoptera) False metallic wood-boring beetle Trixagus BOLD:ABW2869 Beetles (Coleoptera) False metallic wood-boring beetle Trixagus BOLD:AAG9897 Earwigs (Dermaptera) European earwig Forficula auricularia-A BOLD:AAG2513 Flies (Diptera) Root maggot fly Eustalomyia BOLD:AAH2351 Flies (Diptera) Robber fly Machimus sadyates BOLD:AAN5137 Flies (Diptera) March fly Penthetria heteroptera BOLD:AAH3662 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:ACB1079 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:ADD4190 Flies (Diptera) Midge Chironomus BOLD:ACC4669 Flies (Diptera) Midge Orthocladiinae BOLD:ABZ3875 Flies (Diptera) Frit fly Oscinella BOLD:AAN5533 Flies (Diptera) Longlegged fly Dolichopodidae BOLD:ABA0755 Flies (Diptera) Vinegar fly Drosophilidae BOLD:AAE1978 Flies (Diptera) Heleomyzid fly Suillia BOLD:AAG1711 Flies (Diptera) Muscid fly Helina depuncta BOLD:ABV9015 Flies (Diptera) Fungus gnat Cordyla BOLD:AAU8534 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Megaselia pulicaria complex BOLD:AAG3274 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Megaselia rufipes BOLD:AAM9355 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Megaselia BOLD:AAN8693 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Megaselia BOLD:ACL7859 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Phalacrotophora halictorum BOLD:AAG3236 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Phorinae BOLD:AAZ5592 Flies (Diptera) Moth fly Psychodinae BOLD:AAH7142 Flies (Diptera) Flesh fly Oxysarcodexia BOLD:AAG6743 Flies (Diptera) Flesh fly Sarcophaga BOLD:AAD0853 Flies (Diptera) Dung fly Scathophaga BOLD:AAY6412 Flies (Diptera) Dark-winged fungus gnat Bradysia urticae BOLD:AAN6447 Flies (Diptera) Dark-winged fungus gnat Corynoptera perpusilla BOLD:ACD1218 Flies (Diptera) Dark-winged fungus gnat Leptosciarella scutellata BOLD:ABA6409 Flies (Diptera) Dark-winged fungus gnat Sciaridae BOLD:AAC9839 Flies (Diptera) Soldier fly Ptecticus trivittatus BOLD:AAE7386 Flies (Diptera) Crane fly Tipula paludosa BOLD:AAJ5015 True bugs (Hemiptera) Acanaloniid planthopper Acanalonia conica BOLD:AAZ8500 True bugs (Hemiptera) Whitefly Aleyrodidae BOLD:ACJ3864 True bugs (Hemiptera) Aphid Anoecia BOLD:ACF1270 True bugs (Hemiptera) Aphid Nearctaphis crataegifoliae BOLD:AAN8243 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Balclutha abdominalis BOLD:AAO4039 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Osbornellus BOLD:AAZ2090 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Dikraneura BOLD:ABZ4247 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Empoasca BOLD:ACF5026 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Empoasca BOLD:ACV5620 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Empoasca BOLD:AAZ8496 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Eratoneura flexibilis BOLD:AAN8287 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Erythridula wysongi BOLD:AAZ0166 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Erythroneura BOLD:ACC8165 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Forcipata BOLD:AAE6245 True bugs (Hemiptera) Scentless plant bug Arhyssus BOLD:AAR9127 True bugs (Hemiptera) Lace bug Corythucha BOLD:AAA2368 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Small carpenter bee Ceratina BOLD:ACF3747 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Braconid wasp Asobara BOLD:ACD3088 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Braconid wasp Dinotrema BOLD:AAD6802 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Braconid wasp Aphidius BOLD:ACF4030 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Braconid wasp Aphidiinae BOLD:AAZ9744 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Braconid wasp Blacus stelfoxi BOLD:AAN8193 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Braconid wasp Macrocentrus BOLD:ACL8016 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Cuckoo wasp Chrysis cembricola BOLD:ACJ7166 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Rover ant Brachymyrmex BOLD:AAA9461 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Carpenter ant Camponotus BOLD:AAA1467 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Wood ant Formica BOLD:AAC8341 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Yellow meadow ant Lasius flavus BOLD:AAC1302 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) False honey ant Prenolepis imparis BOLD:AAC2392 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ant Myrmecina americana BOLD:ACF3099 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ant Myrmecina americana BOLD:AAA1840 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ant Myrmica BOLD:AAB2708 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Metallic green bee Agapostemon BOLD:AAG7794 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Lissonota coracina BOLD:ABZ4363 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Cymodusa distincta BOLD:ABZ4364 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Cymodusa distincta BOLD:ACF3458 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Cryptus BOLD:AAG7710 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Cryptinae BOLD:AAW0431 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Cryptinae BOLD:AAU8205 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Picrostigeus debilis BOLD:AAN8152 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Chalcid wasp Perilampus BOLD:AAN7538 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Spider wasp Auplopus nigrellus BOLD:AAC5428 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Potter wasp Ancistrocerus adiabatus BOLD:AAA6508 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Paper wasp Polistes BOLD:AAA3654 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Snout moth Crambus BOLD:AAA2087 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) American Idia Idia americalis BOLD:AAA4222 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Green cloverworm moth Hypena scabra BOLD:ACF0067 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Swordsman Dart Agrotis gladiaria BOLD:ABZ1938 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Venerable dart moth Agrotis venerabilis BOLD:AAA5081 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Bronzed cutworm moth Nephelodes minians BOLD:AAA4532 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Owlet moth Spodoptera frugiperda sp. 2 BOLD:AAA4426 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Owlet moth Sunira bicolorago BOLD:AAA2224 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Cabbage white butterfly Pieris rapae BOLD:ACF0478 Grasshoppers & Crickets (Orthoptera) Spur-throated grasshopper Melanoplus BOLD:AAM8931 Barklice, booklice and other lice (Psocodea) Outer barklouse Ectopsocus meridionalis.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024
    Bisley Road Cemetery, Stroud Local Nature Reserve Management Plan 2020 – 2024 Prepared for Stroud Town Council CONTENTS 1 VISION STATEMENT 2 POLICY STATEMENTS 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION 3.1 General background information 3.1.1 Location and site boundaries Map 1 Site Location 3.1.2 Tenure Map 2 Schedule Plan 3.1.3 Management/organisational infrastructure 3.1.4 Site infrastructure 3.1.5 Map coverage 3.2 Environmental information 3.2.1 Physical 3.2.2 Biological 3.2.2.1 Habitats Map 3 Compartment Map – Old Cemetery Map 4 Compartment Map – New Cemetery 3.2.2.2 Flora 3.2.2.3 Fauna 3.3 Cultural 3.3.1 Past land use 3.3.2 Present land use 3.3.3 Past management for nature conservation 3.3.4 Present legal status 4 NATURE CONSERVATION FEATURES OF INTEREST 4.1 Identification and confirmation of conservation features 4.2 Objectives 4.2.1 Unimproved grassland 4.2.1.1 Summary description 4.2.1.2 Management objectives 4.2.1.3 Performance indicators 4.2.1.4 Conservation status 4.2.1.5 Rationale 4.2.1.6 Management projects 4.2.2 Trees and Woodland 4.2.2.1 Summary description 4.2.2.2 Management objectives 4.2.2.3 Performance indicators 4.2.2.4 Conservation status 4.2.2.5 Rationale 4.2.2.6 Management projects 4.2.3 Lichens 4.2.3.1 Summary description 4.2.3.2 Management objectives 4.2.3.3 Performance indicators 4.2.3.4 Conservation status 4.2.3.5 Rationale 4.2.3.6 Management projects 4.3 Rationale & Proposals per compartment Bisley Rd Cemetery Mgmt Plan 2020-2024 2 5 HISTORIC INTEREST 5.1 Confirmation of conservation features 5.2 Objectives 5.3 Rationale 6 STAKEHOLDERS 6.1 Evaluation 6.2 Management projects 7 ACCESS / TOURISM 7.1 Evaluation 7.2 Management objectives 8 INTERPRETATION 8.1 Evaluation 8.2 Management Projects 9 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES 9.1 Operational objectives 9.2 Management projects 10 WORK PLAN Appendix 1 Species List Bisley Rd Cemetery Mgmt Plan 2020-2024 3 1 VISION STATEMENT Stroud Town Council are committed to conserving Stroud Cemetery to: • Enable the people of Stroud to always have a place of peace and quiet reflection and recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Folk Taxonomy, Nomenclature, Medicinal and Other Uses, Folklore, and Nature Conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3
    Ulicsni et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2016) 12:47 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0118-7 RESEARCH Open Access Folk knowledge of invertebrates in Central Europe - folk taxonomy, nomenclature, medicinal and other uses, folklore, and nature conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3 Abstract Background: There is scarce information about European folk knowledge of wild invertebrate fauna. We have documented such folk knowledge in three regions, in Romania, Slovakia and Croatia. We provide a list of folk taxa, and discuss folk biological classification and nomenclature, salient features, uses, related proverbs and sayings, and conservation. Methods: We collected data among Hungarian-speaking people practising small-scale, traditional agriculture. We studied “all” invertebrate species (species groups) potentially occurring in the vicinity of the settlements. We used photos, held semi-structured interviews, and conducted picture sorting. Results: We documented 208 invertebrate folk taxa. Many species were known which have, to our knowledge, no economic significance. 36 % of the species were known to at least half of the informants. Knowledge reliability was high, although informants were sometimes prone to exaggeration. 93 % of folk taxa had their own individual names, and 90 % of the taxa were embedded in the folk taxonomy. Twenty four species were of direct use to humans (4 medicinal, 5 consumed, 11 as bait, 2 as playthings). Completely new was the discovery that the honey stomachs of black-coloured carpenter bees (Xylocopa violacea, X. valga)were consumed. 30 taxa were associated with a proverb or used for weather forecasting, or predicting harvests. Conscious ideas about conserving invertebrates only occurred with a few taxa, but informants would generally refrain from harming firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus), field crickets (Gryllus campestris) and most butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ant Nests in European Ground Squirrel's (Spermophilus
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e38292 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e38292 Short Communications The role of ant nests in European ground squirrel’s (Spermophilus citellus) post-reintroduction adaptation in two Bulgarian mountains Maria Kachamakova‡‡, Vera Antonova , Yordan Koshev‡ ‡ Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research at Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Maria Kachamakova ([email protected]) Academic editor: Ricardo Moratelli Received: 16 Jul 2019 | Accepted: 09 Sep 2019 | Published: 07 Oct 2019 Citation: Kachamakova M, Antonova V, Koshev Y (2019) The role of ant nests in European ground squirrel’s (Spermophilus citellus) post-reintroduction adaptation in two Bulgarian mountains. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e38292. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e38292 Abstract The European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) is a vulnerable species, whose populations are declining throughout its entire range in Central and South-Eastern Europe. To a great extent, its conservation depends on habitat restoration, maintenance and protection. In order to improve the conservation status of the species, reintroductions are increasingly applied. Therefore, researchers focus their attention on factors that facilitate these activities and contribute to their success. In addition to the well-known factors like grass height and exposition, others, related to the underground characteristics, are more difficult to evaluate. The presence of other digging species could help this evaluation. Here, we present two reintroduced ground squirrel colonies, where the vast majority of the burrows are located in the base of anthills, mainly of yellow meadow ant (Lasius flavus). This interspecies relationship offers numerous advantages for the ground squirrel and is mostly neutral for the ants.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts Goettingen O
    Imprint Geschäftstelle der Ge‐ Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft sellschaft für Ökologie für Ökologie, Band 45 Institut für Ökologie Herausgegeben im Auftrag der Gesell‐ Technische Universität schaft für Ökologie von apl. Prof. Dr. Berlin Rothenburgerstr. Michael Bredemeier, Sektion Waldöko‐ 12 systemforschung, Zentrum für Biodiver‐ D‐12165 Berlin sität und nachhaltige Landnutzung (CBL), Tel.: 030‐ Georg‐August‐Universität Göttingen 31471396 Fax.: 030‐31471355 © Gesellschaft für Ökologie Göttingen 2015, ISSN: 0171‐1113 Contact: KCS Kuhlmann Convention Service Universität Göttingen Heike Kuhmann Prof. Dr. Michael Bredemeier, Rue des Chênes Sektion Waldökosystemfor‐ 12 CH‐2800 De‐ schung, Büsgenweg 2 lémont D‐ 37077 Göttingen + 41‐32‐4234384 info@kcs‐convention.com The 45th annual conference of the Ecological Society of Germany, Austria and Switzer‐ land (GfÖ) is taking place from 31st August to 04th September 2015 at the Universi‐ ty of Göttingen. Host of the conference is the Centre for Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use (CBL), University of Göttingen. Local Organizing Committee Chair: Prof. Dr. Christian Ammer, University of Göt‐ tingen Co‐Chairs: Prof. Dr. Teja Tscharntke, Prof. Dr. Kerstin Wie‐ gand, University of Göttingen Proceedings editors: Prof. Dr. Michael Bredemeier, Dr. Juliane Steckel, Ursula Seele, University of Göttingen Field Trip planning: Dr. Simone Pfeiffer, University of Göttingen Scientific Programm Committee Prof. Dr. Christian Ammer, Prof. Dr. Michael Bredemeier, Prof. Dr. Alexander Knohl, Prof. Dr. Holger Kreft, Dr. Simone Pfeiffer, PD Dr. Martin Potthoff, Prof. Dr. Stefan Scheu, Prof. Dr. Teja Tscharntke Dr. G. Wiedey, Prof. Dr. Kerstin Wiegand The book is also available for download as electronic document on the conference web site (www. gfoe‐2015.de) Production: Centre for Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use (CBL), University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077 Göttingen, Germany Editors: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Distribution, Conservation and Functional Relationships
    Irish Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Distribution, Conservation and Functional Relationships Submitted by: Dipl. Biol. Robin Niechoj Supervisor: Prof. John Breen Submitted in accordance with the academic requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Limerick Limerick, April 2011 Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis and that it has not been submitted for any other academic award. References and acknowledgements have been made, where necessary, to the work of others. Signature: Date: Robin Niechoj Department of Life Sciences Faculty of Science and Engineering University of Limerick ii Acknowledgements/Danksagung I wish to thank: Dr. John Breen for his supervision, encouragement and patience throughout the past 5 years. His infectious positive attitude towards both work and life was and always will be appreciated. Dr. Kenneth Byrne and Dr. Mogens Nielsen for accepting to examine this thesis, all the CréBeo team for advice, corrections of the report and Dr. Olaf Schmidt (also) for verification of the earthworm identification, Dr. Siobhán Jordan and her team for elemental analyses, Maria Long and Emma Glanville (NPWS) for advice, Catherine Elder for all her support, including fieldwork and proof reading, Dr. Patricia O’Flaherty and John O’Donovan for help with the proof reading, Robert Hutchinson for his help with the freeze-drying, and last but not least all the staff and postgraduate students of the Department of Life Sciences for their contribution to my work. Ich möchte mich bedanken bei: Katrin Wagner für ihre Hilfe im Labor, sowie ihre Worte der Motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Aceria Pseudoplatani
    Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Aceria pseudoplatani Aceria pseudoplatani acarine (Acari) Alabidocarpus acarine (Acari) Phytoptus avellanae Phytoptus avellanae acarine (Acari) Tetranychidae Tetranychidae acarine (Acari) Tetranychus urticae Tetranychus urticae acarine (Acari) Trombidiidae Trombidiidae acarine (Acari) Bufo bufo Common Toad amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt amphibian Rana Frog amphibian Rana temporaria Common Frog amphibian Triturus Newt amphibian Triturus cristatus Great Crested Newt amphibian Triturus helveticus Palmate Newt amphibian Annelida Worms annelid Eisenia fetida Manure Worm annelid Erpobdella testacea Erpobdella testacea annelid Lumbricus terrestris Common Earthworm annelid Acanthis flammea/cabaret agg. Redpoll (Common\Lesser) agg. bird Accipiter nisus Sparrowhawk bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit bird Alauda arvensis Skylark bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard bird Anthus pratensis Meadow Pipit bird Apodidae Swifts bird Apus apus Swift bird Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Group Ardea cinerea Grey Heron bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck bird Branta canadensis Canada Goose bird Buteo buteo Buzzard bird Caprimulgus europaeus Nightjar bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch bird Certhia familiaris Treecreeper bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull bird Cinclus cinclus Dipper bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw bird Columba Pigeon bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon/Rock Dove
    [Show full text]
  • Ham Hill Country Park
    Survey of species in the HAM HILL COUNTRY PARK for the South Somerset District Council by members and friends of the Yeovil & District Wildlife Recording Group & SSDC Countryside Officers Updated – end December 2017 - 1 - Key: S = Northern Spur; F = Plateau Fields; V = Witcombe Valley (includes Horse’s Wood); W = Pit Wood. - 2 - Survey of species in the HAM HILL COUNTRY PARK for the South Somerset District Council by members and friends of the Yeovil & District Wildlife Recording Group & SSDC Countryside Officers This survey was started in 2004 with the object of recording species found within the Ham Hill Country Park. For the purposes of wildlife recording the area was split into four separate sites: the so-called Northern Spur, that is the area more or less comprising the original Ham Hill Country Park, and the areas added to the country park from 1996 onwards, namely Plateau Fields, Witcombe Valley (including Horse’s Wood) and Pit Wood. Lists have been prepared of: Mammals Reptiles & Amphibians Birds Invertebrates Flowering plants Ferns Fungi Lichens - based on a survey by V. J. Giavarini To be added: Mosses & Liverworts Members are asked to record any species seen within the Park and send that list to the Recording Group so that a continuing up-date of the records can be made. Records will be passed to the SSDC and the Somerset Environmental Records Centre to ensure the best possible use is made of them. Updated – end December 2017 - 3 - Yeovil & District Wildlife Recording Group Records South Somerset District Council Survey HAM HILL COUNTRY PARK Totals of species and forms listed in the Park as of December 2017 Mammals - 12 Reptiles & Amphibians - 2 Birds - 82 Invertebrates - 1066 Flowering plants - 398 Ferns - 12 Mosses - 0 Liverworts - 0 Fungi - 629 Lichens - 87 Total : 2288 Key: S = Northern Spur; F = Plateau Fields; V = Witcombe Valley (includes Horse’s Wood); W = Pit Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Lasius Flavus and L
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Chemical Based Communication and its Role in Decision Making Within the Social Insects Sam Jones A thesis submitted to the University of Sussex, Department of Life Sciences, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2013 Supervisors: Jonathan P. Bacon & Francis L.W. Ratnieks This thesis, whether in the same or different form, has not been previously submitted to this or any other University for a degree ii Abstract This thesis investigates chemical communication and decision making in a stingless bee (Tetragonisca angustula) and two species of ants (Lasius flavus and L. niger). Complex chemical signalling and seemingly elaborate behavioural patterns based upon decisions made by individuals of a colony have facilitated the evolution of social living in these insects. This thesis investigates two important features of social living that involve these features: nest mate recognition and navigation. The first part of this thesis (Chapter 3 and Appendix 3) investigates nestmate recognition and nest defence in the Neotropical stingless bee T.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation and Cross-Amplification of Polymorphic
    Conservation Genet Resour (2011) 3:73–77 DOI 10.1007/s12686-010-9293-3 TECHNICAL NOTE Characterisation and cross-amplification of polymorphic microsatellite loci in ant-associated root-aphids A. B. F. Ivens • D. J. C. Kronauer • J. J. Boomsma Received: 28 June 2010 / Accepted: 20 July 2010 / Published online: 1 August 2010 Ó The Author(s) 2010. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Twenty-six polymorphic microsatellite loci Mutualistic interactions between species are widespread were developed for four species of ant-associated root- and play key roles in ecosystem stability and diversity aphids: Geoica utricularia, Forda marginata, Tetraneura (Stachowicz 2001; Bastolla et al. 2009). In Northwest ulmi and Anoecia corni. We found up to 9 alleles per locus, Europe, the yellow meadow ant Lasius flavus keeps up to with an average of 4.8. We also report polymorphic cross- fourteen species of mutualistic root-aphids in its nests amplification of eleven of these markers between different (Pontin 1978; Heie 1980; Godske 1991). The ants actively pairs of study species. Furthermore, we tested previously tend the aphids, which provide them with honeydew published aphid microsatellites and found one locus (Pontin 1978). The nest mounds are markers of high developed for Pemphigus bursarius to be polymorphic in grassland biodiversity and long-term habitat stability (Dean G. utricularia. These microsatellite markers will be useful et al. 1997; Blomqvist et al. 2000; Lenoir 2009). However, to study the population structure of aphids associated with despite the decline of European temperate grasslands in the ant Lasius flavus and possibly other ants.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant World Instructions
    Designed for children by Nature Experts W O R L D s Kid r Interplay on the Web! o F ! To get all the latest information about s Interplay’s range of products, visit g www.interplayuk.com u w B ho Love Interplay UK Limited Meter House, Fieldhouse Lane, Marlow, Buckinghamshire. SL7 1LW Designed by Interplay UK Limited Made in China ©2012 Interplay UK Limited Manual written by Nick Baker Product Code LW101 v2.0 2012 Please retain our address for future reference. 7958 Ant World Inst 2012.indd 1 16/11/2012 17:55 Designed for children by Explore the wonderful Nature Experts world of ants with naturalist Nick Baker! W O R L D s Kid r o F ! s g u w B ho Love See inside the amazing Discover their amazing abilities, building world of ants! tunnels and moving mountains! www.interplayuk.com 7958 Ant World Inst 2012.indd 2 16/11/2012 17:55 Important Safety About this Kit Information! This kit is a hands-on guide for budding This kit conforms to the following safety naturalists and contains the equipment standards: Europe: CE and EN71 USA: ASTM you need to observe and study the fascinating life of ants. The kit is designed WARNING! to be fun and informative for kids of all ages. However, young children will need the help and For children over 5 years of age only. supervision of an adult. For use under adult supervision. Read This kit can be used all year round. However, the instructions before use. the best results are achieved in the warmer Follow them and keep them months between April and September.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactive Effects of Soil-Dwelling Ants, Ant Mounds and Simulated Grazing on Local Plant Community Composition Veen, G
    University of Groningen Interactive effects of soil-dwelling ants, ant mounds and simulated grazing on local plant community composition Veen, G. F. (Ciska); Olff, H. Published in: Basic and Applied Ecology DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2011.10.001 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2011 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Veen, G. F. C., & Olff, H. (2011). Interactive effects of soil-dwelling ants, ant mounds and simulated grazing on local plant community composition. Basic and Applied Ecology, 12(8), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2011.10.001 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Complexes Under the Influence of Anthropogenic Factors
    Serangga 2020, 25(3): 160-178 Stukalyuk & Goncharenko SHIFT IN THE STRUCTURE OF Lasius flavus (HYMENOPTERA, FORMICIDAE) NEST COMPLEXES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ANTHROPOGENIC FACTORS Stanislav Stukalyuk* & Igor Goncharenko Institute for Evolutionary Ecology National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Acad. Lebedeva str., 37, Kyiv, 03143, Ukraine. *corresponding author: [email protected]. ABSTRACT The structure of five Lasius flavus Fabricius, 1781 (yellow meadow ant) nest complexes with 33 to 211 nest mounds exposed to the anthropogenic impact of varying intensity was studied in 2001 and 2014 from four locations in Crimea. The study areas can be arranged in order of increasing intensity of anthropogenic impact as follows: the Chatyr-Dag Mountain (no impact, two nest complexes), arboretum near Simferopol city (low-intensity impact, moderate grazing, one nest complex), the outskirts of Kurtsy village (high-intensity impact, intensive grazing, ne nest complex), and Gagarinsky Park (critical level of intensity, draining, one nest complex). In 2001, mound measurements were taken from all nest complexes, divided into squares of 20 × 20 m. In 2014, mound measurements were taken from three out of five locations, namely the Chatyr-Dag Mountain (one nest complex), Kurtsy village, and Gagarinsky Park). In 2014, the nest complex in Gagarinsky Park was found to no longer exist. Other nest complexes underwent significant changes. Small nest mounds either disappeared or grew in size. The total nest volume did not change significantly or slightly increased. Therefore, this study concluded that grazing did not affect the ability of nest complexes to grow. The lowering of the groundwater table was found to be a critical factor.
    [Show full text]