TR23 J (Creteway Down, Holy Well and the Hope Farm Area)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
以黃豹天蠶蛾屬為例 Evolutionary Plasticity and Functional Diversity of Eyespot Wing Pattern in Loepa Silkmoths
國立中山大學生物科學系 碩士論文 Department of Biological Sciences National Sun Yat-sen University Master Thesis 翅面眼紋之演化可塑性與功能多樣性- 以黃豹天蠶蛾屬為例 Evolutionary plasticity and functional diversity of eyespot wing pattern in Loepa silkmoths 研究生:蘇昱任 Yu-Jen Su 指導教授:顏聖紘 博士 Dr. Shen-Horn Yen 中華民國 106 年 7 月 July 2017 致 謝 非常感謝顏聖紘副教授,不辭辛勞地從我一開始入學對研究毫無頭緒,到制 定研究方向與題目、想法討論、方法的修改與問題指正,以及海報與論文等書面 修正等,一路指導教育我。 感謝小鳥們健康的活著陪我完成研究,沒有因為被我做的假餌嚇到而拒絕進 食或行為異常。 曾經在研究過程中提供給我幫助的朋友們:陳鍾瑋,引發我部份實驗設計的 構想。陳怡潔,提供我鳥類飼養與部分研究基礎認知。韋家軒,提出我實驗設計 上的缺失並點出我思考方向與研究中可能遭遇的問題與癥結。杜士豪、周育霆、 楊昕,協助我飼養鳥隻。非常謝謝你們的幫助。此外還有不少朋友們,在研究以 外的事務上提供我不少協助,使我能有更多心力專注於研究,感謝各位提供的幫 助,雖然無法將你們的名字在此一一列出,但你們的功勞我依然會銘記在心。 另外感謝一些商家與團體所提供無償的協助:中華民國生物奧林匹亞委員會, 借我使用攝影器材與印刷設備。社團法人高雄市野鳥協會,提供部分實驗用的鳥 隻。北站鳥園、五甲鳥藝坊、藍寶石鳥獸寵物大賣場,提供我不同鳥類飼養的技 巧與經驗分享。 最後我要在此鄭重感謝,高雄醫學大學生物醫學暨環境生物學系,謝寶森副 教授,以及國立中山大學生物科學系,黃淑萍助理教授。兩位老師願意抽空擔任 口試委員,並在短時間內閱讀與修改我的論文,提供我論文修訂上莫大的幫助。 iii 摘 要 眼紋(eye spot)是一種近圓形且具有同心圓環的斑紋。眼紋存在於許多動物體 表,目前最廣為人知的功能是防禦天敵。眼紋禦敵的機制包含威嚇天敵或誘導攻 擊失誤。黃豹天蠶蛾(Loepa)是天蠶蛾科(Saturniidae)下的一屬夜行性蛾類,其屬內 所有物種皆具有眼紋,但研究不如日行性的蛺蝶如此豐富透徹。黃豹天蠶蛾的翅 面斑紋變化不像蛺蝶那麼複雜,僅具有弧度或位置上些微差異,眼紋位置也相似, 推斷應有相同的禦敵機制,但卻在尺寸上有劇烈的變化,甚至有少數物種具有其 他斑紋使眼紋醒目程度下降或比眼紋更顯眼。這些變化與誠實訊號(honest signaling) 及威嚇理論有所牴觸,因此我們認為有必要釐清黃豹天蠶蛾眼紋的變化與其功能 性。首先我們分析了黃豹天蠶蛾所有物種的翅面紋路,歸納出翅紋的模式與少數 具其他斑紋的物種。然而因為黃豹天蠶蛾翅面具大面積黃色,鳥類可能會具有先 天色彩偏見,因此利用人工假餌檢測鳥類先天色彩偏見,之後才進行眼紋尺寸的 變化與其功能性差異的檢測。最後檢測部分具有其他斑紋的物種,這些斑紋是否 具有不同禦敵功效。結果顯示,黃豹天蠶蛾的眼紋效果確實與威嚇理論相符,但 是遭遇不同天敵時的效果有所差異。具有其他斑紋的少數物種在特定情況下反而 能呈現隱蔽作用,而比眼紋顯眼的斑紋則也有類似眼紋的威嚇作用。因此我們認 為在探討斑紋功能時,除了檢測現有功能假說外,還要考慮掠食者的認知多樣性 及共域物種的性狀,亦不可忽略其有功能多樣性的可能,如此才能更了解真實的 獵物-獵食者關係。 關鍵字:眼紋(Eye spot)、黃豹天蠶蛾(Loepa)、威嚇作用(Intimidating -
Beiträge Zur Insekteufauna Der DDR: Lepidoptera — Crambidae
j Beitr. Ent. • Bd. 23 • 1973 • H. 1 -4 • S. 4 -5 5 - Berlin Institut für Pflaiizenscliutzforschung (BZA) der Akademie der Landwirtschaftswissenschaften der D D R zu Berlin Zweigstelle Eberswalde Abteilung Taxonomie der Insekten (ehem. DEI) Ebersw alde Gü n t h e r Pe te r se n , Gerrit F r ie se & Gü n th er R in n h o eer Beiträge zur Insekteufauna der DDR: Lepidoptera — Crambidae Mit 42 Figuren und 51 Farbabbildungen1 Inhalt E in le itu n g ......................................................................................................................... 5 Artenbestand ................................................................................................................... 5 Zoogeograpbische A n alyse ......................................................................... ............ 7 Ökologie ............................................................................................................................. s8 Bestimnumgstabelle ................................................................................................. 11 Systeuiatiseh-fannistiscbes Verzeichnis der Gattungen und Arten 2 0 Verzeichnis (Checklist) der Crambxden der D D R .................................. 50 L it e r a t u r .......................................................................................................................... 53 In d ex ................................................................................................................................... 5 4 Einleitung Im Gegensatz zu den meisten anderen -
Species List
1 of 16 Claypits 20/09/2021 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Aceria macrorhyncha 2012 2012 1 acarine Aceria nalepai 2018 2018 1 amphibian Bufo bufo Common Toad 2001 2018 6 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2001 2018 5 amphibian Lissotriton vulgaris Smooth Newt 2001 2001 1 annelid Hirudinea Leech 2011 2011 1 bird Acanthis cabaret Lesser Redpoll 2013 2013 1 bird Acrocephalus schoenobaenus Sedge Warbler 2001 2011 2 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 2011 2014 2 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 2020 2020 1 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 2013 2018 4 bird Anser Goose 2011 2011 1 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 2013 2013 1 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 2013 2014 1 bird Buteo buteo Buzzard 2013 2014 2 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 2011 2014 5 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2011 2014 6 bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull 2014 2014 1 bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw 2011 2013 2 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 2014 2014 1 bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2011 2018 8 bird Corvus corax Raven 2020 2020 1 bird Corvus corone Carrion Crow 2011 2014 5 bird Curruca communis Whitethroat 2011 2014 4 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2011 2014 6 bird Cygnus olor Mute Swan 2013 2014 4 bird Delichon urbicum House Martin 2011 2011 1 bird Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 2013 2014 2 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 2011 2014 7 bird Falco peregrinus Peregrine 2013 2013 1 bird Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 2010 2020 3 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 2011 2014 7 bird Gallinula chloropus Moorhen 2013 -
Working Today for Nature Tomorrow
Report Number 693 Knepp Castle Estate baseline ecological survey English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 693 Knepp Castle Estate baseline ecological survey Theresa E. Greenaway Record Centre Survey Unit Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre Woods Mill, Henfield West Sussex RH14 0UE You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Cover note Project officer Dr Keith Kirby, Terrestrial Wildlife Team e-mail [email protected] Contractor(s) Theresa E. Greenaway Record Centre Survey Unit Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre Woods Mill, Henfield West Sussex RH14 0UE The views in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of English Nature This report should be cited as: GREENAWAY, T.E. 2006. Knepp Castle Estate baseline ecological survey. English Nature Research Reports, No. 693. Preface Using grazing animals as a management tool is widespread across the UK. However allowing a mixture of large herbivores to roam freely with minimal intervention and outside the constraints of livestock production systems in order to replicate a more natural, pre- industrial, ecosystem is not as commonplace. -
Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’ -
Sambia Succinica, a Crown Group Tenthredinid from Eocene Baltic Amber (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae)
Insect Systematics & Evolution 43 (2012) 271–281 brill.com/ise Sambia succinica, a crown group tenthredinid from Eocene Baltic amber (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) Lars Vilhelmsena,* and Michael S. Engelb aNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark bDivision of Entomology (Paleoentomology), Natural History Museum and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, 1501 Crestline Drive, Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence KS 66045, USA *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Published 17 December 2012 Abstract Sambia succinica gen. et sp.n. from Eocene Baltic amber is described and illustrated. It is apparently the first amber fossil that can be definitively assigned to Tenthredininae. It displays two diagnostic forewing characters for this subfamily: having a bend distally in vein R and the junctions of veins M and Rs + M with vein R being some distance from each other. The variance and possible transitions between the anal vein configurations among the genera in Tenthredininae is briefly discussed. Keywords amber inclusion, sawfly, Tertiary, Eocene, taxonomy Introduction Tenthredinidae is the largest family of non-apocritan Hymenoptera by far, comprising more than 5500 described species (Huber 2009; Taeger & Blank 2010). Together with five other families they comprise the Tenthredinoidea or true sawflies. The larvae of the members of the superfamily are all herbivores and most are external feeders on green parts of angiosperms; however, other host plants and feeding modes (e.g., leafrolling, leafmining, or galling in leaves, buds and shoots; see Nyman et al. 1998, 2000) do occur. Recent comprehensive treatments of the phylogeny of the basal hymenopteran lineages, while providing strong support for the Tenthredinoidea, have consistently failed to retrieve the Tenthredinidae as monophyletic (Vilhelmsen 2001; Schulmeister 2003; Ronquist et al. -
Noctuid Moth (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) Communities in Urban Parks of Warsaw
POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES • INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA MEMORABILIA ZOOL. 42 125-148 1986 GRAŻYNA WINIARSKA NOCTUID MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) COMMUNITIES IN URBAN PARKS OF WARSAW ABSTRACT A total of 40 noctuid moth species were recorded in four parks of Warsaw. Respective moth communities consisted of a similar number of species (17—25), but differed in their abundance index (3.5 —7.9). In all the parks, the dominant species were Autographa gamma and Discrestra trifolii. The subdominant species were represented by Acronicta psi, Trachea atriplicis, Mamestra suasa, Mythimna pallens, and Catocala nupta. There were differences in the species composition and dominance structure among noctuid moth communities in urban parks, suburban linden- oak-hornbeam forest, and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forest. In the suburban and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forests, the number of species was higher by 40% and their abundance wao 5 — 9 times higher than in the urban parks. The species predominating in parks occurred in very low numbers in suburban and natural habitats. Only T. atriplicis belonged to the group of most abundant species in all the habitats under study. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the interest of ecologists in urban habitats has been increasing as they proved to be rich in plant and animal species. The vegetation of urban green areas is sufficiently well known since its species composition and spatial structure are shaped by gardening treatment. But the fauna of these areas is poorly known, and regular zoological investigations in urban green areas were started not so long ago, when urban green was recognized as one of the most important factors of the urban “natural” habitat (Ciborowski 1976). -
Moths of Poole Harbour Species List
Moths of Poole Harbour is a project of Birds of Poole Harbour Moths of Poole Harbour Species List Birds of Poole Harbour & Moths of Poole Harbour recording area The Moths of Poole Harbour Project The ‘Moths of Poole Harbour’ project (MoPH) was established in 2017 to gain knowledge of moth species occurring in Poole Harbour, Dorset, their distribution, abundance and to some extent, their habitat requirements. The study area uses the same boundaries as the Birds of Poole Harbour (BoPH) project. Abigail Gibbs and Chris Thain, previous Wardens on Brownsea Island for Dorset Wildlife Trust (DWT), were invited by BoPH to undertake a study of moths in the Poole Harbour recording area. This is an area of some 175 square kilometres stretching from Corfe Castle in the south to Canford Heath in the north of the conurbation and west as far as Wareham. 4 moth traps were purchased for the project; 3 Mercury Vapour (MV) Robinson traps with 50m extension cables and one Actinic, Ultra-violet (UV) portable Heath trap running from a rechargeable battery. This was the capability that was deployed on most of the ensuing 327 nights of trapping. Locations were selected using a number of criteria: Habitat, accessibility, existing knowledge (previously well-recorded sites were generally not included), potential for repeat visits, site security and potential for public engagement. Field work commenced from late July 2017 and continued until October. Generally, in the years 2018 – 2020 trapping field work began in March/ April and ran on until late October or early November, stopping at the first frost. -
SPIXIANA ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;Download
©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;download: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at SPIXIANA ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;download: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at at leaping (haitikos in Greek) for locomotion and escape; thus, the original valid name of the type genus Altica Müller, 1764 (see Fürth, 1981). Many Flea Beetles are among the most affective jumpers in the animal kingdom, sometimes better than their namesakes the true Fleas (Siphonaptera). However, despite some intensive study of the anatomy and function of the metafemoral spring (Barth, 1954; Ker, 1977) the true function of this jumping mechanism remains a mystery. It probably is some sort of voluntary Catch, in- volving build-up of tension from the large muscles that insert on the metafemoral spring (Fig. 1), and theo a quick release of this energy. Ofcourse some Flea Beetles jump better than others, but basically all have this internal metafemoral spring floating by attachment from large muscles in the relatively enlarged bind femoral capsule (see Fig. 1 ). In fact Flea Beetles can usually be easily separated from other beetles, including chrysomelid subfa- milies, by their greatly swollen bind femora. There are a few genera of Alticinae that have a metafemoral spring and yet do not jump. Actually there are a few genera that are considered to be Alticinae that lack the metafemo- ral spring, e. g. Orthaltica (Scherer, 1974, 1981b - as discussed in this Symposium). Also the tribe Decarthrocerini contains three genera from Africa that Wilcox (1965) con- sidered as Galerucinae, but now thinks to be intermediate between Galerucinae and Alti- cinae; at least one of these genera does have a metafemoral spring (Wilcox, personal communication, and Fürth, unpublished data). -
(Hymenoptera, Symphyta) in the Biotopes of Kopa^Ki Rit
NAT. CROAT. VOL. 15 No 4 189–201 ZAGREB December 31, 2006 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad SAWFLIES (HYMENOPTERA, SYMPHYTA) IN THE BIOTOPES OF KOPA^KI RIT FRANJO PEROVI]1,ENRIH MERDI]2 &GORDANA PEROVI]3 1Hrvatski prirodoslovni muzej, Demetrova 1, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2Odjel za biologiju, Sveu~ili{te J. J. Strossmayera, Trg Lj. Gaja 6, 31000 Osijek, Croatia 3Bra}e Radi}a 21, HR-10360 Sesvete, Croatia Perovi}, F., Merdi}, E. & Perovi}, G.: Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) in the biotopes of Kopa~ki rit. Nat. Croat., Vol. 15, No. 4., 189–201, Zagreb, 2006. During 2003, entomological investigations were carried out into the sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) of Kopa~ki rit Nature Park, supported by the Ministry of Culture, project Insect Re- search, and by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports project Entomofauna of Kopa~ki rit. At three groups of stations: inundated, forest and open ground (a total of 8 stations) a total of 220 individuals were sampled selectively with a net and with sticky tablets. From this material, 73 species of sawfly were determined. There is a clear differentiation of the inundated area at which the presence of only 15 species was recorded, but with great abundance, 7 species being recorded only in such kind of habitat (they were recorded only in the inundated area). This investigation also demonstrated that the borderline area between forest and meadow was the best habitat for the sawfly. At this kind of station in Tikve{, the presence of 35 species was recorded. Key words: sawflies, Kopa~ki rit, biotic diversity Perovi}, F., Merdi}, E. -
Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe. -
Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015 Contents
Wimbledon and Putney Commons Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015 Contents CONTEXT 1 A. SYSTEMATIC RECORDING 3 METHODS 3 OUTCOMES 6 REFLECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 B. BIOBLITZ 19 REFLECTIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT 21 C. REFERENCES 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location of The Plain on Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2 Figure 2 Experimental Reptile Refuge near the Junction of Centre Path and Somerset Ride 5 Figure 3 Contrasting Cut and Uncut Areas in the Conservation Zone of The Plain, Spring 2015 6/7 Figure 4 Notable Plant Species Recorded on The Plain, Summer 2015 8 Figure 5 Meadow Brown and white Admiral Butterflies 14 Figure 6 Hairy Dragonfly and Willow Emerald Damselfly 14 Figure 7 The BioBlitz Route 15 Figure 8 Vestal and European Corn-borer moths 16 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Mowing Dates for the Conservation Area of The Plain 3 Table 2 Dates for General Observational Records of The Plain, 2015 10 Table 3 Birds of The Plain, Spring - Summer 2015 11 Table 4 Summary of Insect Recording in 2015 12/13 Table 5 Rare Beetles Living in the Vicinity of The Plain 15 LIST OF APPENDICES A1 The Wildlife and Conservation Forum and Volunteer Recorders 23 A2 Sward Height Data Spring 2015 24 A3 Floral Records for The Plain : Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2015 26 A4 The Plain Spring and Summer 2015 – John Weir’s General Reports 30 A5 a Birds on The Plain March to September 2015; 41 B Birds on The Plain - summary of frequencies 42 A6 ai Butterflies on The Plain (DW) 43 aii Butterfly long-term transect including The Plain (SR) 44 aiii New woodland butterfly transect