County of Council Agenda Wednesday, January 23, 2013 - 9:30 a.m. Council Chamber, County Court House

Page

1. Call To Order 2. Invocation "Most merciful God, we yield Thee our humble and hearty thanks for Thy Fatherly care and preservation of us this day, and for the work which Thou has enabled us to perform.

We pray for Your Guidance and direction in our deliberations during this meeting, so that we may render a service to the Community that we are trying to serve. - Amen" 3. Roll Call 4. Adoption of Agenda Recommendation: That County Council adopts the agenda as circulated. 5. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest 6. Adoption of Minutes 7-18 Recommendation: That the minutes of the County Council meeting of January 9, 2013 be adopted as circulated. 7. Delegations, Petitions and Presentations a. 9:35 a.m. Bryan Weir, Director of Planning Re: Introduction of Sara Chartrand, GIS Technologist Be it resolved that County Council receives the delegation of Bryan Weir, Director of Planning concerning the introduction of Sara Chartrand, GIS Technologist. 19-26 b. 9:40 a.m. Dr. Steven E. Franklin, President, Re: Update on Trent University Be it resolved that County Council receives the delegation from Dr. Steven E. Franklin, President, Trent University concerning an update onTrent University.

Page 1 of 253 County of Peterborough County Council Agenda Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Page

7. Delegations, Petitions and Presentations c. 9:50 a.m. Jeff Leal, MPP – Peterborough Re: New Year’s Greetings Be it resolved that County Council receives the delegation from Jeff Leal, MPP – Peterborough concerning his New Year’s Greetings. 27-54 d. 10:00 a.m. Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services, City of Peterborough and Linda Mitchelson, Social Services Division Manager, City of Peterborough Re: JSSC - Social Services Budget for 2013 Be it resolved that County Council:

1. Receives the delegation from Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services, City of Peterborough and Linda Mitchelson, Social Services Division Manager, City of Peterborough concerning the 2013 Social Services Draft Budget.

2. Refers the financial request to the 2013 County of Peterborough budget deliberations. 55-57 e. 10:10 a.m. Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services and Chris Kawalec, Community Social Plan Coordinator, City of Peterborough Re: Asset Mapping – Social Services in the City and County Be it resolved the County Council receives the delegation from Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services and Chris Kawalec, Community Social Plan Coordinator, City of Peterborough concerning Asset Mapping – Social Services in the City and County. 8. Referrals 9. Staff Reports 59-63 a. Bryan Weir, Director of Planning Re: Proposed Amendment to Growth Plan for the Greater Recommendation: That the County of Peterborough supports the

Page 2 of 253 County of Peterborough County Council Agenda Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Page

9. Staff Reports Proposed Growth Plan Amendment and that the Ministry of Infrastructure be so notified. 65 b. Robert English, Chief of Paramedics Re: Peterborough County Public Access Defibrillator Program (PAD) Recommendation: That County Council authorizes the total number of PAD Sites within the County of Peterborough to be 62. 67-92 c. Ron Gerow, Chair, Waste Management Master Plan Update Steering Committee Re: Process and Introduction (Verbal) Chris Bradley, Director of Public Works Report prepared by: Laurie Westaway, Manager of Environmental Services and Dave Bucholtz, Consultant, Cambium Environmental Inc. Re: Waste Management Master Plan (WMMP) Recommendation: 1. That Council endorses the WMMP in principle with the direction for staff to present phased program implementation as a part of successive future Public Works Environmental Services annual budget presentations.

2. That staff provides ongoing reports on residential promotion and feedback systems, funding and financial strategies, and annual diversion impact monitoring.

Waste Management Master Plan - December 19, 2012 https://peterboroughcounty.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentList.aspx? ID=115190 10. Staff Reports for Information Only 93 a. John Butler, Director of Finance/Treasurer Re: Investment Report By-law 2010-68 Recommendation: Receive for information. 95-99 b. Bryan Weir, Director of Planning Report prepared by: Christine Lang, Secretary-Treasurer, Land Division Committee

Page 3 of 253 County of Peterborough County Council Agenda Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Page

10. Staff Reports for Information Only Re: Land Division Report - January - December, 2012 Recommendation: Receive for information. 101-129 c. Bryan Weir, Director of Planning Re: 2011 Census Information Report Recommendation: Receive for information. 131-144 d. Sally Saunders, Clerk Report prepared by: Lynn Fawn, Deputy Clerk/Office Supervisor Re: Correspondence Report Recommendation: Receive for information. 145-157 e. Gary King, CAO Re: 2012 4th Quarter Summary of Projects and Work Priorities Recommendation: Receive for information. 159-234 f. Gary King, CAO Re: EOWC and EORN Activities Report and Status Update Recommendation: Receive for information. 235 g. Warden J. Murray Jones Re: Meetings Attended during December, 2012 Recommendation: Receive for information. 237 h. Deputy Warden Barry Rand Re: Meetings Attended during December, 2012 Recommendation: Receive for information. 11. Correspondence - Action Items 239-245 a. LLF Lawyers letter dated January 9, 2013 Re: Conveyance of Part 4, Plan 45R-15025 (Water Street, Lakefield) Be it resolved that County Council: 1. Receives the LLF Lawyers' letter dated January 9, 2013, and the November 16, 2010 Township of Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield Manager of Building and Planning Staff Report concerning the conveyance of Part 4, Plan 45R-15025 (Water Street, Lakefield) from the Township of Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield to the County of Peterborough.

2. Directs the Clerk to prepare the necessary by-law authorizing the signing of all documents related to this conveyance.

Page 4 of 253 County of Peterborough County Council Agenda Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Page

12. Committee Reports 247-251 a. Councillor Andy Mitchell Joint Services Steering Committee Re: Minutes of January 10, 2013 Recommendation: That County Council receives and adopts the minutes of the Joint Services Steering Committee with respect to the meeting of January 10, 2013. 13. Accounts 14. Liaison Reports from External Committees, Boards and Agencies a. Affordable Housing Action Committee - Councillor Windover b. Agricultural Advisory Committee - Councillor Nelson c. Fairhaven Committee of Management - Councillor Pearcy d. Peterborough County-City Health Unit - Councillor Sharpe e. Peterborough County Federation of Agriculture - Councillor Crowley f. Trent Conservation Coalition Source Protection Committee - Councillor Smith 15. Resolutions 16. Notices of Motion 17. New Business 18. Closed Session a. Under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, s. 239(2) to discuss: "the security of the property of the municipality or local board", "personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees", "labour relations or employee negotiations", "litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board", "advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose".

Page 5 of 253 County of Peterborough County Council Agenda Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Page

19. Rise from Closed Session With/Without a Report 20. Adoption of Amended Agenda to Add Closed Session Items Being Reported 21. Reading and Passing of By-laws a. A By-law to authorize the Corporation of the County of Peterborough to extend the Banking Services Contract with The Royal Bank of to expire December 31, 2014 and to repeal By-law No. 2007-37. b. (Subject to Council Approval) A By-law relating to the transfer of Part 4, Plan 45R-15025 (Water Street, Lakefield) from the Township of Smith- Ennismore-Lakefield to the County of Peterborough. (refer to item 11.a.) c. A By-law to authorize the County of Peterborough to enter into an Employment Contract with Gary King as Chief Administrative Officer/Deputy Clerk for a 5-year term commencing January 1, 2013. 22. Confirming By-law To confirm the proceedings of the Council of the County of Peterborough held this 23rd day of January, 2013. 23. Future Meeting Schedule 253 a. Future Meeting Schedule January - March, 2013 24. Adjournment

Page 6 of 253 County of Peterborough Meeting of County Council Minutes Wednesday, January 9, 2013

1. Call To Order

A quorum of Council being present, Warden Jones called the meeting to order at 9:38 a.m.

2. Invocation

Warden Jones led Council in prayer.

"Most merciful God, we yield Thee our humble and hearty thanks for Thy Fatherly care and preservation of us this day, and for the work which Thou has enabled us to perform."

"We pray for Your Guidance and direction in our deliberations during this meeting, so that we may render a service to the Community that we are trying to serve. - Amen"

3. Roll Call

The Clerk conducted the roll call.

Present: Warden J. Murray Jones, Deputy Warden Joe Taylor, Councillors Janet Clarkson (left at 1:30 p.m.), Joseph Crowley, John Fallis, Ronald Gerow, Scott McFadden, Andy Mitchell, Karl Moher, David Nelson (left at 12:55 p.m.), Douglas Pearcy (left at 1:30 p.m.), Barry Rand (arrived at 10:51 a.m.), Mary Smith, James Whelan and Ron Windover.

Absent: Councillor Andy Sharpe.

Staff Chris Barry, Deputy Chief of Paramedics; Chris Bradley, Present: Director of Public Works; John Butler, Director of Finance/Treasurer; Sheridan Graham, Director, Procurement, Facilities and Communication; Gary King, Chief Administrative Officer; Patti Kraft, Director of Human Resources; Bill Linnen, Manager of Operations; Iain Mudd, Manager of Planning and Sally Saunders, Clerk.

Page 1

Page 7 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

4. Adoption of Agenda

1-2013 Moved by: Councillor Windover Seconded by: Councillor Fallis

Be it resolved that County Council adopts the agenda as circulated. Carried

5. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest

There were no declarations of pecuniary interest made.

6. Adoption of Minutes

2-2013 Moved by: Councillor Crowley Seconded by: Councillor Gerow

Be it resolved that the minutes of the County Council meeting of December 19, 2012 be adopted as circulated. Carried

7. Delegations, Petitions and Presentations

a. Sally Saunders, Clerk Re: Oath of Office of Deputy Warden Joe Taylor

Warden Jones introduced Councillor Joe Taylor as the Deputy Warden for the County of Peterborough for 2013. Deputy Warden Taylor was officially sworn in as Deputy Warden for the County of Peterborough for the year. He thanked the Warden and County Council for this honour.

3-2013 Moved by: Councillor Nelson Seconded by: Councillor Clarkson

Be it resolved that County Council receives the delegation from Sally Saunders, Clerk concerning the Oath of Office of Deputy Warden Joe Taylor. Carried

Page 2

Page 8 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013 b. Dean Del Mastro, MP - Peterborough and Barry Devolin, MP - Haliburton--Brock Re: Trent Severn Waterway

Warden Jones thanked MPs Del Mastro and Devolin for attending today’s Council meeting in response to Council’s recent invitation to jointly discuss the Trent Severn Waterway issue. MP Barry Devolin – Haliburton- Kawartha Lakes-Brock provided background on this very important aspect of the County and called upon everyone to work together for the benefit of the areas. He referred to the Trent Severn Water Panel Study Report titled “It’s all about the Water” which still has significant value and he referred to the many changes and deficit challenges facing the Federal Government.

MP Del Mastro focused on the primary functions of the Trent Severn Waterway being the supply of water and water management, tourism support and the supply of green energy.

MP’s Devolin and Del Mastro responded to Council questions relating to improved marketing of the Trent Severn Waterway, the recommendations contained in the Trent Severn Water Panel Study Report titled "It's All About the Water”, designation as a national historic site,

MP Devolin advised Council that he recommended through a Private Members Bill that the Trent Severn Waterway not be included under Parks Canada because the Waterway is not a park but is envisioned as a transportation network. He added that a Crown corporation should be created comprised of two separate areas, (water management and navigation/visitor services) and report to the federal Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. He recommended that the Board of Directors be composed of representatives from all levels of government similar to the GTA Airport, that the Corporation be assured of budget certainty and a long-time commitment to the infrastructure focused on safety and health.

Page 3

Page 9 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

4-2013 Moved by: Councillor Whelan Seconded by: Councillor Smith

Be it resolved that County Council receives the delegation from Dean Del Mastro, MP - Peterborough and Barry Devolin, MP - Haliburton-Kawartha Lakes-Brock regarding the Trent Severn Waterway. Carried

8. Referrals

There were no referrals brought forward.

9. Staff Reports

a. Bryan Weir, Director of Planning Report prepared by: Iain Mudd, Manager of Planning Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision Extension Request File No. 15T-96001 - Township of Asphodel-Norwood - Applicant: 1087086 Inc. (former owner: Don Johnston)

The Manager of Planning reviewed his report with County Council advising that in January, 2002, County Council granted the owner draft plan approval for a 12-lot residential plan of subdivision within the Norwood ward and received two 3-year extensions (to January 24, 2013) to the draft plan prior to selling the lands. The applicant has requested an additional extension to finalize engineering plans and to resolve stormwater engineering issues associated with the final plan and the developer is working with the County, Township and ORCA in an effort to develop an overall stormwater management plan which will provide a more suitable arrangement for dealing with stormwater from three developments in the area. Mr. Mudd concluded his report by advising that the Township will only support a six-month extension beyond the January date.

Page 4

Page 10 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

5-2013 Moved by: Councillor Pearcy Seconded by: Councillor Nelson

Be it resolved that the request for extension of draft plan approval submitted on behalf of 1087086 Ontario Inc. (File No. 15T- 96001) be granted and the draft plan approval be extended to July 24, 2013. Carried

b. Chris Bradley, Director of Public Works and Sheridan Graham, Director, Procurement, Facilities & Communication Report prepared by: Bill Linnen, Manager of Operations and Kim Squires, Purchasing Clerk Re: T-19-2012 Tender for one (1) New 60,000lb GVWR Cab & Chassis Trucks with Set Forward Axle, One-Way Front Plow, Wing, and All Season Combination Dump Body/Spreader

The Manager of Operations reviewed the joint report and responded to Council questions.

6-2013 Moved by: Councillor Whelan Seconded by: Councillor Clarkson

Be it resolved that County Council award tender T-19- 2012 to B & I’s Complete Truck Centre in the amount of $217,068.48 including refundable taxes of $21,591.59, as their tender submission was the lowest tender submitted meeting the tender specifications. Carried

10. Staff Reports for Information Only

The Warden asked if any member of Council would like to deal with any staff reports for information only separately.

a. Sheridan Graham, Director, Procurement, Facilities & Communication Re: EORN Backbone Launch (Video Presentation)

The Director, Procurement, Facilities & Communication presented a video available at the following link regarding the recent Regional Network Backbone Launch.

Page 5

Page 11 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-kFvUZPjQ0

7-2013 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Smith

Be it resolved that County Council receives the above noted Staff Report for Information Only. Carried

b. Sheridan Graham, Director, Procurement, Facilities & Communication Report prepared by: Kim Squires, Purchasing Clerk Re: Purchasing Awards - December 2012

c. Sally Saunders, Clerk Report prepared by: Lynn Fawn, Deputy Clerk/Office Supervisor Re: Correspondence Report

8-2013 Moved by: Councillor Pearcy Seconded by: Councillor Whelan

Be it resolved that County Council receives the remaining above noted Staff Reports for Information Only. Carried

11. Correspondence - Action Items

a. 2013 ROMA OGRA Combined Conference Re: Delegation Requests – Deadline January 18, 2013

9-2013 Moved by: Councillor Windover Seconded by: Councillor Fallis

Be it resolved that County Council directs staff to make delegation requests to the Provincial Ministers on the subject matters noted below and should the delegation requests be approved by the Ministry, the Councillors and staff noted below, attend the Ministerial delegation during the OGRA/ROMA Conference being held in in February, 2013:

Page 6

Page 12 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Ministry Subject Delegate Health & Capital Funding Councillor Sharpe* Long-Term Care for Heath Unit

Finance Declining Funding Councillor Gerow*

Natural Conservation Councillors Gerow Resources Authority Funding and Rand*

Community & Cuts to Discretionary Warden J. Murray Social Services Benefits Jones, Councillors Gerow, Mitchell* and Whelan

* Contact Name Carried

b. Habitat for Humanity letter dated November 6, 2012 Re: Development Charges

10-2013 Moved by: Councillor Taylor Seconded by: Councillor Whelan

Be it resolved that County Council supports Habitat for Humanity's letter dated November 6, 2012 requesting the development charges of $4,250 be waived for the 12 Samis Drive, Lakefield build. Carried

c. Regional Municipality of Halton resolution dated December 12, 2012 Re: OMB Costs – Provincial Growth Plan

11-2013 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Clarkson

Be it resolved that County Council supports the Regional Municipality of Halton’s resolution dated December 12, 2012 concerning OMB Costs – Provincial Growth Plan. Carried

Page 7

Page 13 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

12. Committee Reports

a. Warden J. Murray Jones Warden's Committee Re: Minutes of December 14, 2012

12-2013 Moved by: Councillor Smith Seconded by: Councillor Pearcy

Be it resolved that County Council receives and adopts the minutes of the Warden's Committee with respect to the meeting of December 14, 2012. Carried

13. Accounts

There were no accounts presented.

14. Liaison Reports from External Committees, Boards and Agencies

a. Greater Peterborough Area Economic Development Corporation - Gary King, CAO and GPA EDC Board Member reported that no December meeting of the Board was held but that the Board has been advised of Council’s endorsement of John McKnight as the County representative on the Board and that Mr. Elmer Buchanan will be contacted to arrange Council recognition of his services to the County on the Board. Mr. King advised that the next scheduled meeting of the Board is January 28th.

b. Greater Peterborough Chamber of Commerce – Councillor Moher reported that the 2013 Chair is Drew Merrett of Merrett Home Hardware Building Centre, Vice- Chair is Bob Doornenbal of Driving Miss Daisy, Treasurer is Patrick Marren of Glenn Windrem Trucking and the Directors at Large are Jason Becker of BDO Dunwoody and Kamran Qayyum of Siemens Canada. Councillor Moher advised that the Annual General Meeting will be held in March.

Page 8

Page 14 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

c. Peterborough Housing Corporation – Councillor Clarkson reported that an emergency meeting was held to ratify the contract.

d. Shining Waters Railway Board of Directors - Warden Jones did not have a report.

13-2013 Moved by: Councillor Smith Seconded by: Councillor Pearcy

Be it resolved that the Liaison Representative reports and supporting documentation be received for information. Carried

15. Resolutions

a. Canada Post Rural Addressing Committee

14-2013 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Fallis

Be it resolved that the following Councillors be appointed to the Canada Post Rural Addressing Committee recently established by Council and composed of MP Dean Del Mastro, a representative from the GPA EDC and County Council and other potential stakeholders to deal with the changes to rural addresses imposed by Canada Post:

1. Councillor Moher

2. Councillor Clarkson (alternate). Carried

16. Notices of Motion

There were no notices of motion presented.

17. New Business

There were no new business items.

Council recessed from 11:18 a.m. to 11:27 a.m.

Page 9

Page 15 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

18. Closed Session

15-2013 Moved by: Councillor Fallis Seconded by: Councillor Clarkson

Be it resolved under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, s. 239(2) County Council move into closed session at 11:27 a.m. to discuss "the security of the property of the municipality or local board", "personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees", "a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board ", "labour relations or employee negotiations", "litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board", "advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose". Carried

19. Rise from Closed Session With/Without a Report

16-2013 Moved by: Councillor Whelan Seconded by: Councillor Moher

Be it resolved that County Council rise from closed session at 1:32 p.m. without a report. Carried

Councillors Clarkson, Nelson and Pearcy did not return to the meeting.

20. Adoption of Amended Agenda to Add Closed Session Items Being Reported

There were no items being reported.

21. Reading and Passing of By-laws

Due to time constraints, the Warden dispensed with the reading of the by- laws.

a. A By-law to confirm the appointment of Councillor Joe Taylor as Deputy Warden for the County of Peterborough for 2013. (By-law Number 2013-02)

Page 10

Page 16 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

b. A By-law to authorize the borrowing of $2,000,000.00. (By-law Number 2013-01)

17-2013 Moved by: Councillor Fallis Seconded by: Councillor Windover

Be it resolved that by-laws a. and b. be passed, signed by the Warden and the Clerk, sealed with the Seal of the Corporation and Numbered. Carried

22. Confirming By-law

18-2013 Moved by: Councillor Crowley Seconded by: Councillor Moher

Be it resolved that the by-law to confirm the proceedings of the Council of the County of Peterborough held this 9th day of January, 2013 be passed, signed by the Warden and the Clerk, sealed with the Seal of the Corporation and Numbered By-law 2013-03. Carried

23. Future Meeting Schedule

a. January • January 10 - 3:45 p.m. - JSSC Meeting (City Hall, Sutherland Room) • January 16 - 9:30 a.m. - Land Division Committee (Council Chamber) • January 21 - 2:00 p.m. - Waste Management Committee (City Hall, General Committee Room) • January 22 - 9:30 a.m. - Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee and Christmas Lunch (Lang Pioneer Village, MacKelvie Room) • January 23 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council • January 28 - 9:00 a.m. - Transportation Plan Update Steering Committee (310 Armour Road, EMS Training Room) • January 30 - 3:00 p.m. - Accessibility Advisory Committee (Boardroom)

Page 11

Page 17 of 253 Minutes of Peterborough County Council Wednesday, January 9, 2013

February • February 6 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council • February 6 - 12:00 p.m. - County Council Photographs (Main Foyer) • February 19 - 9:30 a.m. - Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee (Lang Pioneer Village, MacKelvie Room) • February 20 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council • February 27- 3:00 p.m. - Accessibility Advisory Committee (S-E-L Lower Level Boardroom) • February 28 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council Special Meeting (2013 Draft Budget)

March • March 4 - 2:00 p.m. - Waste Management Committee (City Hall, General Committee Room) • March 6 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council • March 20 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council • March 26 - 9:30 a.m. - Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee (Lang Pioneer Village, MacKelvie Room) • March 27- 3:00 p.m. - Accessibility Advisory Committee (S-E-L Lower Level Boardroom)

24. Adjournment

19-2013 Moved by: Councillor Gerow Seconded by: Councillor Fallis

Be it resolved that the County Council meeting adjourn at 1:32 p.m. Carried

______J. Murray Jones Warden

______Sally Saunders County Clerk

Page 12

Page 18 of 253 Trent University 1. Building on the Past, Building for the Future 2. Teaching, Research, Community Plans 3. Five-year Goals and New Ideas Page 19 of 253 Trent University - The Numbers • Current students: – 7,621 Undergraduate – 477 Graduate – 700 International, ESL • More than 40,000 alumni • 1,900 Trent employees • 2 campuses •Page 20 of 253 Economic impact $300 million – Annual Budget approx. $100M

Teaching Excellence • Higher than provincial average on all five measures of student satisfaction – 92% happy picking Trent – 94% of grads employed within 6 months • 19 faculty with Distinguished Teaching Awards • New programs

Page 21 of 253 – Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems, Journalism, Media Research

• $20M annual, 13 Canada Research Chairs • Undergraduate and graduate research across many disciplines, interdisciplinary • Strong focus on local issues and solutions – TCCBE, 200 students in the community • Trent Centre for Biomaterials Research • Trent Water Quality Centre (with Fleming) – Just two examples of Trent’s groundbreaking Page 22 of 253 research centres Trent’s Steady Progress

• #1 in Ontario, #5 nationally in Maclean’s – Primarily undergraduate university • Ranked 12th in Canada for research • Record turn out for fall Open House – 2,300 in Peterborough (1,200 in 2011) – 76 students and their families (62 students in 2011) Page 23 of 253 Trent Lands Plan • Launched community consultation process – January 29th, Holiday Inn Peterborough • Building on previous strategic plans • Linking experiential learning, financial sustainability • Potential uses for the Trent Endowment Lands – Sustainable village, research park, community spaces, commercial and residential Page 24 of 253 50th Anniversary, Aug 2014 to June 2015 • Prof. Tom Symons, Honorary Chair • Alumni Homecoming Weekend Aug. 2014 • Milestone Gala – October 17, 2014 • Community celebrations – all year • “50 Years of Trent” – Former Trent student D’Arcy Jenish compiling memories from Trent from alumni, students, staff, Page 25 of 253 faculty and the community – share your story Thank You

Comments and Questions Welcome

Dr. Steven E. Franklin [email protected] 705 748 1090 http://www.trentu.ca Page 26 of 253

Overview By Linda Mitchelson, Social Services Division Manager And Ken Doherty, Director Community Services

Page 27 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 (In Millions) OW/ES Admin and Client ($10.2)

OW Benefits ($32.3)

Homelessness ($2.5)

Community Social Plan ($0.25)

Children's Services ($9.2)

Page 28 of 253 Other ($0.25)

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  Upload of Ontario Works program continues  Discretionary benefit funding from Province reduced as of July 1, 2012  Homelessness programs consolidate into one program (CHPI) beginning January 1, 2013  CSUMB no longer Mandatory benefit, now part of CHPI at reduced provincial subsidy  New provincial OW database to be rolled out in 2013  Move to full day JK/SK continues  New Children’s Services funding model January 1, 2013  Current office lease expires March 31, 2013 – options being

Page 29 of 253 reviewed

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 • Province uploading 100% of costs of mandatory and discretionary benefits*, addictions, hostel per diem, employment admin and client costs by 2018 • 2013 benefit cost share 85.8% province, 14.2% municipal (2012 – 82.8%/17.2%) • Estimated 2013 County savings due to upload $179,000 Page 30 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  2012 County average caseload year end projection is 679 compared to 2012 budgeted average caseload of 700

 County 2013 average caseload budget is projected at 693 (2.0% increase over

Page 31 of 253 2012 actual projection of 679)

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 3500

3400

3300

3200

3100 2011

3000 2012 2013 Budget 2900 Linear (2012)

2800

2700

2600 Page 32 of 253

2500 Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 750

700

2011

650 2012

600 2013 Budget

Linear (2012)

550

500 Page 33 of 253 Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 250

200

150

100

50 2010

0 2011 2012 Page 34 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 Function 2013 Prov. City County % Expend Share Share Share Change County OW/ES Admin 10,230,783 6,218,859 3,315,957 695,967 2.4% OW Benefits 32,328,327 27,554,135 3,910,592 863,600 -17.2% Homelessness 2,451,459 1,739,912 447,547 264,000 55.3% PERC 0 0 0 0 n/a Community 249,323 0 113,329 135,994 1.3% Social Plan Children’s 9,199,550 7,576,816 1,226,206 396,527 7.5% Services Other 230,566 80,266 121,737 28,564 41.4%

TOTALPage 35 of 253 $54,690,008 $43,169,988 $9,135,368 $2,384,652 -1.3%

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  New funding model began April 1, 2011, combining OW and ES admin and ES client costs  Additional subsidy available – approximately $1,5M but requires 50% Municipal matching funds  Cost share for 2013 of Municipal contribution is 83% City and 17% County (2012 – 82% City, 18% County)  Includes office expenses - Current lease expires March 31, 2013  Includes PERC costs since August 2012 with

Page 36 of 253 termination of MTCU funding– Program to be reviewed following 12 month pilot

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013

 Document presented to JSSC to support need for additional staffing and discretionary benefits

 Additional staff approved in 2012 budget to support increase in caseload continued in 2013 (2 Temporary Case Managers and 1 Permanent Supervisor) – Municipal portion paid for by previous year’s unspent incentive fund

 One of the Additional positions used to pilot Integrated Page 37 of 253 County Worker (GCH)

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013

Function 2013 Prov. City County % Expend Share Share Share Change County

Mandatory 30,557,437 26,218,281 3,583,512 755,644 -21.2% Benefits

Discretionary 1,216,046 848,803 270,812 96,431 36.5% Benefits

Addiction 554,844 487,051 56,268 11,525 -9.6% Services Page 38 of 253 TOTAL $32,328,327 $27,554,135 $3,910,592 $863,600 -17.2%

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  2013 average caseload budgeted to be 693, resulting in a decrease in costs

 Average cost per case for 2013 budgeted to be $639.85, down from $663.81 in 2012 – resulting from removal of CSUMB from mandatory benefits and added to CHPI program

Page 39 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  As of July 1, 2012, province capped benefit subsidy to $10 per case (OW and ODSP) per month, cost shared 85.8% province, 14.2% CMSM, for health and non-health benefits

 Estimate that this new cap leaves shortfall of $1.26M in funding from 2012 budget

Page 40 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013

 Decisions made at City budget sessions: ◦ Continue to offer discretionary benefits status quo to the end of April 2013 to allow lobbying of provincial government to change funding decision ◦ 2012 budget, additional $25,788 of 100% municipal funds required from the County to pay fund to the end of April ◦ Discretionary benefits to be reviewed again in spring of 2013 Page 41 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  January 1, 2013 new 100% provincial funded homelessness program - Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI)  Estimated provincial funding for 2013 falls short of 2012 funding by $1.6M  Council added $350,000 100% municipal funds ($290,000 City, $60,000 County) to homelessness budget to offset projected loss from province to support Housing Stability Benefit  Dec. 27 Province Announced Additional One Time Funding of $1.5 M

Page 42 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013

 County Share of core homeless programs capped at $204,000

 Municipal funds will continue to support emergency hostels, domiciliary hostels, drop-in centre and other municipal programs to support individuals from previous years

 Additional $60,000 County Share of Housing Stability Benefit for a total of $264,000 Page 43 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  2013 budget set at $249,323, cost shared 60% County/40% City (except for community grants and seniors program funded 50/50) at a cost of $135,994 for the County  Key Priorities as defined by Townships including Youth/Seniors/Food and Transportation issues  Coordinate and promote access to services for rural residents through Help Centre, Employment Outreach and community partnerships  50/50 Reserve of $131,815 available for projects

Page 44 of 253 and initiatives e.g. Service Mapping Project

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 2013 Prov. City County % +/- Function Expend Share Share Share County

CS Administration 365,532 165,680 149,889 49,963 15.6% Early Learning 2,797,127 2,797,127 0 0 N/A CD Fee Subsidy 1,975,839 1,580,671 296,376 98,792 4.2% Directly Op Pro 307,375 0 230,531 76,844 18.4% OW Child Care 572,250 457,800 94,993 19,457 -5.6% Wage Subsidy 1,911,121 1,559,293 263,871 87,957 4.2% Special Needs 1,270,306 1,016,245 190,546 63,515 4.2% Resourcing TOTALPage 45 of 253 $9,199,550 $7,576,816 $1,226,206 $396,528 7.5%

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  City/County % cost share will shift from 76/24 in 2012 to 75/25 in 2013  New funding model introduced late December 2012 by Ministry of Education – funding reduced by approximately $94,000  Move to full day JK and SK to be phased in over 5 years beginning Sept 2010 – Some agencies starting to see enrollment decline -  Best Start unconditional grant held in reserve now used to assist local child care system to address Page 46 of 253 impacts of changes ($200,000 budgeted for 2013)

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  CS Admin increase primarily due to movement of Early Learning related salaries to administration program

 DNA Fee Subsidy, Wage Subsidy, Special Needs, Directly Operated Daycares have been budgeted status quo for 2012 Page 47 of 253

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013  MOHLTC program 80/20 province/municipal  Given increased focus/needs of Seniors City Council approved an increase in this program area to $100,000 Gross (Province $80,266, City $15,257, County $4,477)  Will allow for approximately 30 more individuals to receive in home supports  Working with Community Care and PHC to identify low income seniors requiring Page 48 of 253 supports to coordinate referrals

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 For further information please contact:

Linda Mitchelson at 705-748-8830, ext 3770

or [email protected]

or http://www.peterborough.ca/Living/City_Serv

Page 49 of 253 ices/Social_Services.htm

Peterborough County Council January 23, 2013 Page 50 of 253 Page 51 of 253 Page 52 of 253 Page 53 of 253 Page 54 of 253

TO: Members of the Joint Services Steering Committee

FROM: Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services

MEETING DATE: January 10, 2013

SUBJECT: Report CSSSJSSC13-001 Community Service Mapping Project

PURPOSE

A report to inform the Joint Services Steering Committee about the Community Service Mapping Project being developed by the Social Services Division.

RECOMMENDATION

That the Joint Services Steering Committee endorse the recommendation outlined in Report CSSSJSSC13-001 dated January 10, 2013 of the Director of Community Service, as follows:

That the report and a presentation be received for information.

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

There is no direct budget or financial implications arising from this report. This project has been financed through the Community Social Plan 2012 operating budget and been approved by administrative staff.

Page 55 of 253 Report CSSSJSSC13-001 – Community Service Mapping Project Page 2

BACKGROUND

The Social Services Division has been taking steps to improve access and awareness of social and employment services to City and County residents. One of these steps has been through the Community Social Plan (CSP) and the creation of a tool to create Community Service Maps. The goal of the Project is to illustrate the geographic location of services in the City and County of Peterborough through a webpage on the City’s website. This webpage is not currently available to the public but can be found at: http://www.peterborough.ca/CommunityServiceMap

The CSP started the Project as a way of identifying and promoting services being offered in the County of Peterborough. The map would also be used to identify gaps in service, and in turn, lead to strategies for addressing the gaps. The need for information about existing services and gaps is relevant to both the City and the County.

The Map is being built in stages based on different service sectors. The first sector mapped is “Children and Youth Services”. Local services related to children and youth have been divided into eleven categories. Users of the map will be able to filter and display organizations based on the services they provide, such as: Child Care Services, Disability Services, Parenting Services, and Youth Justice Services to name a few.

The database that supports the map and contains all the agency information has been supplied through a partnership with the United Way of Peterborough and District and Fourinfo.com. A consultant was hired to undertake to technical components of creating the mapping tool and framework for staff to maintain the map into the future.

Fourinfo.com is an on-line database that provides information on human services and volunteer opportunities in Peterborough County, Northumberland County, City of Kawartha Lakes and . This is also the database used by the 211 phone service to make community and social service referrals in Peterborough. By using this database for the Map, the need to collect and maintain a duplicate database at the City was eliminated.

One shortfall of the Fourinfo.com database is local agencies that provide services in multiple locations often only have one record in the database. This record is usually for their head office often located in the City. As the project develops and expands, agencies are being asked to create new records that describe their outreach locations so they are included on the Map.

The Community Service Mapping Project is lead by the Social Services Division and guided by a Steering Committee comprised of community partners, including:

Page 56 of 253 Report CSSSJSSC13-001 – Community Service Mapping Project Page 3

 United Way of Peterborough and District/Fourinfo.com  Peterborough County-City Health Unit  Peterborough Family Resource Centre  Peterborough Social Planning Council  Peterborough Drug Strategy Network  City of Peterborough: Arts, Culture and Heritage Division  City of Peterborough: Recreation Division

Future sectors being considered for mapping include: Housing & Homelessness Services, Senior Services, Employment Services, Food Programs, Recreation Services, and Cultural Assets.

Presentations of the Map have been made to local groups who work with children and youth to receive comments and feedback. These groups include:  Planning Table for Children and Youth  Youth Advisory Committee  Health Unit Program Management Team  Child Care Business Partners Committee

The Map will be located on the Social Services website and become public after presentations are made to County and City Councils on January 21st – and 28th respectively.

Submitted by,

Ken Doherty Linda Mitchelson Director of Community Services Social Services Division Manager

Contact Name: Chris Kawalec Community Social Plan Coordinator Phone: 705-748-8830 Ext. 3834 Fax: 705-742-0542 E-Mail: [email protected]

Page 57 of 253 Page 58 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Bryan Weir, Director of Planning

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: Proposed Amendment to Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe

Recommendation: That the County of Peterborough Supports the Proposed Growth Plan Amendment and that the Ministry of Infrastructure be so Notified

Financial Impact: None

Overview:

The current version of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GP) contains Schedule 3. This Schedule displays growth forecasts and projections until the year 2031 for Upper and Single Tier municipalities in the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH). The Growth Plan Act allows the Province to update this Schedule every 5 years.

The forecasts in the Growth Plan were originally developed in the early 2000’s in collaboration with municipalities using Statistics Canada’s 2001 Census data. Census data for 2006 and 2011 is now available and presents an opportunity to verify and update the original forecasts. Consequently, the Province has now undertaken a proposed revision to Schedule 3 and has released it for comment. The revision changes the forecasted population and employment figures to the year 2041. Comments are being accepted until February 8, 2013.

Analysis:

The current version of Schedule 3 shows a population forecast of 61,000 for the County to 2031. The proposed amendment to Schedule 3 to 2041 contains a population forecast of 76,000 which represents a 15,000 person increase. Staff has reviewed the implications of this change and is satisfied with this proposed allocation. This is embraced especially in the face of an apparent decline in permanent population as per the 2011 Census. Staff believes that the 2011

Page 59 of 253 Page 2

decline does in fact represent a temporary situation; one which is reinforced by the allocation for Peterborough County.

The proposed Schedule 3 also contains employment forecasts to 2041 for the County. The Province is projecting an employment base of 24,000 by 2041 as compared to the current forecast of 18,000 to the year 2031.

The proposed change to Schedule 3, if or when approved by the Province, will enable County staff to undertake a more accurate allocation of population and employment to our 8 Townships. Council may recall that the current growth forecasts for population and employment were undertaken on a percentage basis because of a forecasting inaccuracy by the Province when the current numbers were devised. Because the County’s 2006 population was greater than the 2006 forecast, we were faced with going forward using a percentage basis.

Later this year, staff will be commencing a comprehensive update to the County Official Plan. As part of this mandatory 5-year review, new Growth Plan population and employment numbers will be incorporated into the Official Plan and subsequently allocated among our 8 Townships.

Therefore, it is recommended that Council receive this staff report and send comments to the Ministry of Infrastructure in support of the proposed Amendment to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe.

Respectfully submitted,

Original signed by

Bryan Weir Director of Planning

Attachment: Amendment 2 to the Provincial Growth Plan (Note: The first part of the Amendment makes changes to forecast time period. The Second part relates solely to the Simcoe Sub-area. The last part of the Amendment contains the proposed changes to Schedule 3.)

Page 60 of 253 Page 3

“Proposed Amendment 2 to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006

This page is the start of the Proposed Amendment. Text boxes in this section are for explanatory purposes and will not form part of the Amendment, if approved.

1. Introduction

1.1 is amended by replacing “2031” with “2041” in the third paragraph, second sentence.

The second sentence in the third paragraph of section 1.1 would read, “It is a framework for implementing the Government of Ontario’s vision for building stronger, prosperous communities by better managing growth in this region to 2041”.

1.2 is amended by replacing “2031” with “2041” in the title and in the first paragraph, first sentence.

The title of section 1.2 would read, “Vision for 2041”, and the first sentence in the first paragraph would read, “More than anything, the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH) will be a great place to live in 2041”.

1.4 is amended by replacing “2031” with “2041” in the second paragraph, second sentence.

The second sentence in the second paragraph of section 1.4 would read, “It contains a set of policies for managing growth and development to the year 2041”.

6. Simcoe Sub-area

6.2.1 is amended by replacing “be applied instead of Schedule 3” with “be used for planning and managing growth to 2031 after which Schedule 3 will be used”.

Policy 6.2.1 would read, “Notwithstanding policy 5.4.2.2 (a), lower-tier municipalities in the County shall use the population and employment forecasts contained in Schedule 7 for planning and managing growth in the Simcoe Sub-area. In the application of the policies of this Plan, in the Simcoe Sub-area Schedule 7 will be used for planning and managing growth to 2031 after which Schedule 3 will be used”.

6.2.2 is amended by deleting “in Schedule 7”.

Policy 6.2.2 would read, “The employment forecasts include employment located in the strategic settlement employment areas and economic employment districts”.

Page 61 of 253 Page 4

6.3.1.4 is amended by deleting “in Schedule 7”.

Policy 6.3.1.4 would read “The Town of Innisfil, Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury and the Town of New Tecumseh will direct a significant portion of population and employment growth forecasted to the applicable primary settlement areas. The Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury and the Town of Innisfil, in planning to meet their employment forecasts, may direct appropriate employment to the Bradford West Gwillimbury strategic settlement employment area and the Innisfil Heights strategic settlement employment area respectively”.

6.5.3 is amended by adding “where this Plan allocates growth forecasts to the lower-tier municipalities in the County,” after “5.4.2.2(c),”.

Policy 6.5.3 would read, “Notwithstanding policy 5.4.2.2 (b) and 5.4.2.2 (c), where this Plan allocates growth forecasts to the lower-tier municipalities in the County, the Minister of Infrastructure will identify for the County of Simcoe and the lower-tier municipalities in the County intensification targets to achieve the intensification target, and identify density targets to achieve the density target for designated greenfield areas”.

Schedules

8. Schedule 3 is replaced by the following Schedule 3:

SCHEDULE 3

Distribution of Population and Employment for the Greater Golden Horseshoe to 2041

Distribution of Population and Employment for the Greater Golden Horseshoe to 2041 (figures in 000s) POPULATION EMPLOYMENT 2031 2036 2041 2031 2036 2041 Region of Durham 960 1,080 1,190 350 390 430 Region of York 1,500 1,700 1,790 780 840 900 City of Toronto 3,080 3,300 3,400 1,640 1,680 1,720 Region of Peel 1,640 1,870 1,970 870 920 970 Region of Halton 780 910 1,010 390 430 470 City of Hamilton 660 730 780 300 330 350 GTAH TOTAL** 8,620 9,600 10,150 4,330 4,580 4,830 County of 96 105 110 33 37 39 Northumberland County of 61 73 76 18 21 24 Peterborough

Page 62 of 253 Page 5

City of Peterborough 88 109 115 42 54 58 City of Kawartha 100 101 107 27 30 32 Lakes County of Simcoe 416 456 497 132 141 152 City of 210 231 253 101 114 129 City of 41 44 46 21 22 23 County of Dufferin 80 81 85 27 31 32 County of Wellington* 122 126 130 54 54 56 City of * 175 183 191 92 97 101 Region of Waterloo 729 779 815 366 377 393 47 54 59 19 24 27 City of 126 154 169 53 73 82 County of Haldimand 56 61 64 20 24 26 Region of Niagara 511 579 614 218 249 267 OUTER RING 2,880 3,140 3,330 1,240 1,350 1,440 TOTAL** TOTAL GGH** 11,500 12,740 13,480 5,560 5,930 6,270

Note: Numbers rounded off to nearest 10,000 for GTAH municipalities, GTAH Total and Outer Ring Total, and to nearest 1,000 for outer ring municipalities.

* Population growth of 24,000 and employment growth of 12,000 are currently unallocated between the County of Wellington and the City of Guelph for 2031. The unallocated forecast portion is not included in the forecasts for these municipalities for 2031 but is included in the Outer Ring Total and in the GGH Total for 2031.

** Total may not add up due to rounding and unallocated amounts which are included in the totals.”

Page 63 of 253 Page 64 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Bob English, Chief of Paramedics

Date: January 23, 2013.

Subject: Peterborough County Public Access Defibrillator Program (PAD)

Recommendation: That County Council authorizes the total number of PAD Sites within the County of Peterborough to be 62.

Financial Impact: Between $17,400 and $18,200 in the 2013 Paramedic Operating Budget

Overview: At the regular session of County Council held on December 7, 2012, Finance Director John Butler brought forward a report with the following staff recommendation:

It is staff’s recommendation that, if Council agrees to support the H&S AED program, that it be as follows: that it be stipulated as being for a maximum of 60 units at a total annual cost for batteries, pads and unit replacement of $17,400. Further, the program be funded and maintained through the County’s Emergency Paramedic Service at their discretion. Further, that should H&S entertain expanding the program to 80 AED units (or beyond), approval for on-going maintenance is sought from Council before the program expansion is undertaken.

At the time, there were 55 approved PAD Sites within the County of Peterborough and a decision to fulfil the request for 5 additional sites was reviewed. It was determined, through a request for placement of a PAD in one of the local Legions, that none of the 7 Legions in the County were approved PAD Sites.

Analysis: As a result, staff has made the decision to place a PAD in each of the above noted Legions bringing the total number of approved sites to 62. It is intended that the additional 2 sites will not impose any further increase than contained in the December 7th report as outlined above.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert S. English, Chief

Page 65 of 253 Page 66 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Laurie Westaway, Manager of Environmental Services

Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Subject: Waste Management Master Plan (WMMP)

Recommendation: That Council endorse the WMMP in principle with the direction for staff to present phased program implementation as a part of successive future Public Works Environmental Services annual budget presentations. Further, that staff provide ongoing reports on residential promotion and feedback systems, funding and financial strategies, and annual diversion impact monitoring.

Financial Impact: To be determined.

In February of 2011, the County of Peterborough commenced the development of the Waste Management Master Plan (WMMP). The purpose of the plan was to understand the existing diversion and disposal systems in order to improve and analyse current and future waste management services. This final document outlines the options to improve efficacy of waste management and increase the County diversion rate from 39% (2010) to the socially and politically desired goal of 60%. The WMMP also outlines potential disposal options for future consideration in the required Environmental Assessment.

Development of this plan followed the Master Planning Process which included significant opportunities for public and other stakeholder participation. Public input was sought at:  Township Council Meeting presentations (Spring 2011 and Fall 2012)  Public Information Centre’s (Summer 2011 and Fall 2012)  Waste site surveys and events (Summer 2011)  Discussions at Municipal Waste Management Committee (Township Waste Management Staff – November 2011, January and November 2012)  Two online survey forums (Summer 2011 and Fall 2012)

The plan has been developed by a consulting team at Cambium Environmental Inc. working with staff at the County Public Works department. The City, Waste Management Industry representatives, County Planning department, and have worked with the consulting team as part of the Technical Advisory

Page 67 of 253 Page 2

Committee. A Steering Committee, comprised of members of County Council, oversaw the plan progression and provided guidance and direction to staff and consultants.

Included in the plan is: - Current system overview – programs, challenges, and finances - Waste composition, projected waste needs and opportunities over the 20 year planning period for diversion and disposal of materials - Strengths and challenges outlined for options considered - Key recommendations for the short, medium, and long term with an implementation plan, projected diversion impact, and financial estimates

It should also be noted that throughout the document there are several references to the City of Peterborough. Although the City has developed a WMMP separate from the County, both municipalities are committed to working together effectively and efficiently to manage municipal solid waste through formal partnerships, aligned policies, and operational relationships. The County and the City were involved in mutual consultations throughout the development of both WMMPs.

Attached is a copy of the County of Peterborough Waste Management Master Plan.

It is recommended that Council endorse the WMMP in principle with the direction for staff to present phased program implementation as a part of successive future Public Works Environmental Services annual budget presentations. Further, that staff provide ongoing reports on residential promotion and feedback systems, funding and financial strategies, and annual diversion impact monitoring.

Respectfully submitted,

Originally signed by

Laurie Westaway, Manager of Environmental Services

Page 68 of 253 County of Peterborough Waste Management Master Plan

January 23, 2013 Page 69 of 253

Prepared by Cambium Environmental Inc. Waste Management Summary

• 23,700 tonnes of residential waste generated (2010)

• 9,347 tonnes or 39.4% of residential waste diverted including blue box, leaf and yard material composting and MHSW (40.7%*)

• Net cost for the blue box program was $253 per

Page 70 of 253 tonne ($332*)

* Rural Regional Municipal Average Summary continued…

• The County disposed 14,350 tonnes at the PCCWMF, 227 kg per capita (199 kg/cap*).

• Each Township provides varying levels of waste management services. They are responsible for the operation of waste transfer stations and/or landfill sites, garbage collection, and any bag tag/limits/user pay system or policy Page 71 of 253 enforcement.

* Rural Regional Municipal Average 2010 Waste Composition Page 72 of 253 WMMP - Waste Disposal • Bensfort Receives ~ 80,000 tonnes per year from:

7% 18% County City IC&I 47% 28% Cash Residential

Page 73 of 253 • The County (in partnership with the City) is required to complete an Environmental Assessment to determine the long term disposal option WMMP – Waste Disposal

• Plan provides initial information on options for disposal of 15,000 Tonnes by 2030 including: • EFW (i.e. “incineration” & thermal technologies) • Expand/Construct Landfill • Exportation and Alternatives

Page 74 of 253 Since 2010 Page 75 of 253 Environment Days

MHSW

Composting Durable Plastic

Styrofoam Organics

Page 76 of 253 Electronics! More Changes…

• New Township By-Laws • Existing By-Law enforcement • Additional Programs – Construction & Demolition, WEEE, Leaf and Yard • Outreach • Cottage Associations • My Waste App Page 77 of 253 Page 78 of 253 Waste Auditing Page 79 of 253 In the Bag… Page 80 of 253 Waste Opportunities

• Backyard Composting • Leaf and Yard • C&D • Clean Wood • Drywall • Policies • By-Laws • Enforcement

Page 81 of 253 Diversion – Current and Future

Future (darker colour)

Current (lighter colour)

Page 82 of 253 Waste Management Timeline * Residents pay a total of $84/year per household for all County waste diversion programs

*

Garbage

Page 83 of 253 Bensfort Environmental NFA at Goal 25.4% Assessment for Capacity Disposal Outreach / Feedback

• Presentations made to all Township Councils

• Public Information Centres

• Local Media (PSA, Radio, articles)

• Discussions at Municipal Waste Management Committee (Township Waste Management Staff)

• Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and First Nations Page 84 of 253 • Public Survey No. 1 and No. 2 Public Comments – No. 1

• Total Surveys Received: 232 (2011) • Permanent / Seasonal: 65% / 35% • 87% want the County to meet or exceed 60% diversion • Highest interest for reduction 1. increased blue box items 2. large article / appliance pick-up 3. re-use centres / more MHSW events

Page 85 of 253

Public Comments – No. 2

• Total Surveys Received: 448 • Permanent / Seasonal: 30% / 70% • GCH and HBM cottagers (78% total) • Unclear on who is responsible for waste management • Confusion regarding municipal taxes – concern around high taxes for “no services” • Strongly against increasing taxes to pay for Page 86 of 253 additional programs

Local Impact Page 87 of 253 Next 5 years • Backyard Composting – Garbage to Garden

• 2013 Leaf and Yard collection for diversion • Secure capacity for processing • Work with all Townships on Urban curbside and Depot bin locations • 4 months – Spring & Fall  Curbside every other week

Page 88 of 253 over 2 months  Bins on sites for 2 month periods Next 5 years continued… • 2013 Construction and Demolition • County-wide RFP for depot bins and processing • Working with Townships on Approvals/Training as required

• 2013 County-wide Waste Management By-Law • Update Mandatory Recycling and Disposal By- Laws (1989 and 1996 respectively) Page 89 of 253 • Implement Council Direction – 2 bags or less of garbage per household per week (Dec 2011) 10+ years…

• Source Separated Organics (food materials) – Rural Depots and Curbside in strategic urban areas • IC&I Waste Research • Building Permit Waste Plans • Materials Bans and Enforcement Page 90 of 253 2013 Budget

• Landfill - $50,000 (shared) for commencing EA • Ongoing monitoring/research of options

• Environmental Services – WMMP related… • MRF facility assessment ($15,000) • Garbage to Garden (no change from 2012) • Leaf & Yard ($80,000) – added to Organics • Polystyrene Depots ($26,000) Page 91 of 253 • Organics - Reserves Contributions ($33,500)

Questions

Dave Bucholtz, Cambium Environmental Inc. [email protected] 705-742-7900

Page 92 of 253 Laurie Westaway, County of Peterborough [email protected] 705-775-2737

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: John Butler, Director of Finance/Treasurer

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: Investment Report By-law 2010-68

Recommendation: Receive for Information

Financial Impact: Improve interest revenue earned.

Background/Analysis:

As at December 31, 2012 the Corporation of the County of Peterborough had $4,633,056 invested as follows:

1. Investment – Municipality Contribution Agreement to the Eastern Ontario Wardens Caucus (EOWC) $118,057 at an annual flat rate of 5%. Principle to be reduced by annual County EOWC Broadband contributions. 2. Investment – Manulife Securities, Business Advantage Investment Account, $514,999 principal with accrued floating interest (rate for December 2012 – 1.40%) 3. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) – CIBC Wood Gundy - BMO Bond - $3,000,000 at 2.855%, term 5-years. 4. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) – 2 year, guaranteed investment certificate (GIC) - $1,000,000 at 1.84% per annum.

The above investment meets the criteria as established by the Investment By-law.

Respectfully submitted,

Original signed by

John Butler

Page 93 of 253 Page 94 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Chris Lang, Land Division Secretary-Treasurer

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: Land Division Committee Report for 2012 Recommendation: Receive for Information Financial Impact: None Note: Report to come quarterly

2012 LAND DIVISION COMMITTEE ACTIVITY

RECEIVED APPLICATIONS DECISIONS LDC Staff Received Amended Validation Hearing Approved Denied Withdrawn Adjourned Approval

Jan 7 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 5

Feb 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16

Mar 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

Apr 13 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 2

May 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 11

Jun 11 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 8

Jul 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 9

Aug 4 4 0 5 5 0 0 0 8

Sept 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Oct 13 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 20

Nov 4 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 10

Dec 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7

YTD 2012 113 18 0 14 12 0 0 2 102

YTD 2011 124 6 1 25 24 0 0 1 107

Page 95 of 253 Page 2

RECEIVED APPLICATIONS BY MUNICIPALITY

New Lot Addition R-O-W Easement Validation Correct Title Amended Total

Asphodel-Norwood 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

Cavan-Monaghan 10 4 0 0 0 0 5 19

Douro-Dummer 13 7 0 0 0 0 2 22

Galway-Cav & Harvey 21 2 5 1 0 0 2 31

Havelock-Bel-Meth 7 6 0 1 0 0 2 16

North Kawartha 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 6

Oton South Mon 12 2 0 1 0 0 3 18

Smith-Ennis-Lake 4 10 0 0 0 0 3 17

Total 71 34 5 3 0 0 18 131

113

RECEIVED APPLICATIONS BY WARD Correct New Lot Addition R-O-W Easement Validation Title Amended Total

Anstruther 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Asphodel 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

Belmont 7 3 0 0 0 0 2 12

Burleigh 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 5

Cavan 9 4 0 0 0 0 5 18

Cavendish 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Chandos 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Douro 8 3 0 0 0 0 2 13

Dummer 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 9

Ennismore 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

Galway 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Harvey 21 2 5 1 0 0 1 30

Havelock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lakefield 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Methuen 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 4

Millbrook 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

North Monaghan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Norwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Otonabee 12 2 0 1 0 0 3 18

South Monaghan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Smith 4 8 0 0 0 0 3 15

Total 71 34 5 3 0 0 18 131

113

Page 96 of 253 Page 3

2012 Approvals by Planning Director Straight Forward Consent Decisions Jan 17 12 B -80-11 Sidney & Charlotte Bakker Otonabee new lot Jan 17 12 B-83-11 Anna Aubut-Machowska Cavan new lot Jan 17 12 B-93-11 Elm Grove Cottages Inc, Otonabee addition Jan 17 12 B-96-11 481230 Ontario Limited Cavan addition Jan 17 12 B-101-11 Shelley Rafferty Galway ROW Feb 2 12 B-85-11 Melanie Robinson Otonabee new lot Feb 2 12 B-93-10 1715611 Ontario Inc. Harvey addition Feb 2 12 B-102-10 Christopher Trull Otonabee addition Feb 2 12 B-102-11 Robert Stevens Cavan addition Feb 2 12 B-105-11 Wayne & Elsie Tedford Douro new lot Feb 2 12 B-106-11 Wayne & Elsie Tedford Douro new lot Feb 15 12 B-115-11 Hawkshaw Family Trust Galway addition Feb 15 12 B-99-11 Elfrieda Mandeljc Harvey new lot Feb 15 12 B-103-11 Frank & Donna Crump Asphodel new lot Feb 15 12 B-112-11 Gerry O’Grady Douro new lot Feb 15 12 B-117-11 Charles & Allyson Butt Harvey addition Feb 23 12 B-11-08A Joseph & Charlene Deshane Belmont new lot Feb 23 12 B-12-08A Joseph & Charlene Deshane Belmont addition Feb 23 12 B-104-11 R. Kent Young & D. Sharon Suntok Belmont addition Feb 23 12 B-111-11 Scott Wootton & Catherine Kirk Smith new lot Feb 23 12 B-116-11 Rodney & Shari de Wolde Millbrook new lot Mar 21 12 B-75-11 Dewdney Mountain Farms Ltd Harvey new lot Mar 21 12 B-108-11 Greg Driscoll Otonabee easement Mar 21 12 B-113-11 Phyllis & Ivan Trotter Anstruther addition Mar 21 12 B-114-11 Phyllis & Ivan Trotter Anstruther addition Mar 21 12 B-123-11 Maurice & Cathy Hickey Douro new lot Mar 21 12 B-124-11 Maurice & Cathy Hickey Douro new lot Apr 12 12 B-60-11A Joan Gwen Tedford Burleigh new lot Apr 12 12 B-118-11 Jane Darling Smith addition May 7 12 B-2-12 Susan Evely Harvey ROW May 7 12 B-55-11 Mary, Stuart & Doug Mason Belmont addition May 7 12 B-56-11 Mary, Stuart & Doug Mason Belmont addition May 7 12 B-57-11 Mary, Stuart & Doug Mason Belmont addition May 7 12 B-58-11 Drew & Marjorie Ridpath Smith new lot May 7 12 B-98-11 Peter Pearson & Lorie Coleshill Smith addition May 7 12 B-100-11 Francis Spooner Havelock new lot May 15 12 B-9-12 Ronald Hamilton Harvey new lot May 15 12 B-10-12 Ronald Hamilton Harvey new lot May 15 12 B-14-12 John Deshane Belmont addition May 15 12 B-21-12 Nick Flynn Harvey addition Jun 8 12 B-11-12 David & Darlene Weales Cavan addition Jun 8 12 B-12-12 David & Darlene Weales Cavan addition

Page 97 of 253 Page 4

Jun 20 12 B-6-12 Joseph & Dani Gaudreau Douro new lot Jun 20 12 B-7-12 Joan & John Smith Douro new lot Jun 20 12 B-15-12 David John Cole Smith addition Jun 20 12 B-25-12 James & Dianne Cox Belmont new lot Jun 20 12 B-26-12 Ruth & James Hall Otonabee addition Jun 27 12 B-3-12 Vicki Jacobs & Terry McMillan Asphodel new lot Jul 3 12 B-40-12 John Ronald Campbell Estate Dummer addition Jul 4 12 B-110-11 Danny & Judy Payne Dummer new lot Jul 18 12 B-1-12 Archibald Balmer Dummer new lot Jul 18 12 B-22–12 Mike & Lori Cummings Otonabee new lot Jul 18 12 B-27-12 Shirley Wood Otonabee new lot Jul 18 12 B-31-12 Mary & Ronald Frankish Douro addition Harold Leerentveld & Patricia Fach- Jul 18 12 B-32-12 Leerentveld Harvey new lot Harold Leerentveld & Patricia Fach- Jul 18 12 B-33-12 Leerentveld Harvey new lot Jul 18 12 B-87–11A Tom & Sherry Beers Galway addition Aug. 18 12 B-36-12 Shanan Burns & Greg Vaughan Cavan New Lot Aug. 18 12 B-37-12 Shanan Burns & Greg Vaughan Cavan New Lot Aug. 18 12 B-38-12 Marjorie Ann Tanner Smith Addition Aug. 18 12 B-50-12 Nick Flynn Harvey ROW Aug. 18 12 B-59-12 July Douglas Dummer Addition Aug. 18 12 B-80-10A Gregory Clark Douro New Lot Aug. 18 12 B-88-11A Sahyog Investments Belmont New Lot Aug. 18 12 B-89-11A Sahyog Investments Belmont New Lot Oct 1 12 B-44-12 Sahyog Investments Belmont New Lot Oct 1 12 B-45-12 Sahyog Investments Belmont New Lot Oct 1 12 B-46-12 Sahyog Investments Belmont New Lot Oct 1 12 B-65-12 Judy Helen Moon Harvey ROW Oct 1 12 B-68-12 Beesley, Luminaire, Hilsden Burleigh Addition Oct 1 12 B-69-12 Beesley, Luminaire, Hilsden Burleigh Addition Oct 1 12 B-75-12 Walter Janzen Ennismore Addition Oct 1 12 B-76-12 Walter Janzen Ennismore Addition Oct 22 12 B-66-12 George & Jean Spence Harvey ROW Oct 22 12 B-34-12 Rosemary Duncan Burleigh New Lot Oct 22 12 B-47-12 2237044 Ont Inc Harvey New Lot Oct 22 12 B-48-12 2237044 Ont Inc Harvey New Lot Oct 22 12 B-49-12 2237044 Ont Inc Harvey New Lot Oct 22 12 B-51-12 2237044 Ont Inc Harvey New Lot Oct 22 12 B-52-12 2237044 Ont Inc Harvey New Lot Oct 22 12 B-53-12 2237044 Ont Inc Harvey New Lot Oct 22 12 B-54-12 2237044 Ont Inc Harvey New Lot Oct 22 12 B-55-12 2237044 Ont Inc Harvey New Lot Oct 22 12 B-72-12 Terry & Crystal O'Brien Douro New Lot

Page 98 of 253 Page 5

Oct 22 12 B-79-12 John E. & Gail Allen Otonabee ROW Nov 2 12 B-67-12A St. Mary's Cement Smith Addition Nov 2 12 B-93-12 St. Mary's Cement Smith New Lot Nov 16 12 B-4-12A Gregory & Susan Lawson Harvey New Lot Nov 16 12 B-17-12 Lanee Investments Harvey New Lot Nov 16 12 B-18-12 Lanee Investments Harvey New Lot Nov 16 12 B-20-12 Francine Joan Woods Smith New Lot Nov 16 12 B-29-12 Larry Toms Belmont New Lot Nov 16 12 B-30-12 Larry Toms Belmont New Lot Nov 16 12 B-82-12 Stephen & Julie Weir Smith Addition Nov 16 12 B-85-12 Albert Trotter Burleigh New Lot Dec 11 12 B-41-10 A(2) Bradley & Natasha Ferguson Douro New Lot Dec 11 12 B-71-12 Murray & Marilyn Gillis Millbrook New Lot Dec 11 12 B-83-12 Bradley & Natasha Ferguson Douro Addition Dec 11 12 B-86-12 Robert & Margaret McGarrity Douro Addition Dec 20 12 B-98-12 Lynn & Lorrie Belrose Harvey Easement Dec 20 12 B-99-12 Lloyd & Florence Schuknecht Harvey New Lot Dec 20 12 B-100-12 Lloyd & Florence Schuknecht Harvey New Lot

Respectfully submitted,

Originally signed by

Christine Lang

Page 99 of 253 Page 100 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Bryan Weir, Director of Planning

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: 2011 Census Information report

Recommendation: Receive for Information

Financial Impact: None

Overview:

Last year, preliminary 2011 Census information was made available to the public. Council requested that a report be provided when more detailed information became available. Staff of the Planning department has now compiled and analysed certain available data and have presented it in the attached report.

Respectfully submitted,

Original signed by

Bryan Weir

Page 101 of 253 Page 2

Page 102 of 253

County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis: 2011 Census

Page 103 of 253

County of Peterborough Planning Department January 2013 Page 104 of 253

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ...... i Note on Definitions and Geography ...... ii Executive Summary ...... iii 1. Demographic Overview...... 1 1.1. County and Townships 2011 Population ...... 1 1.2. Occupied Households & Household Size ...... 3 1.3. Median Age of the County ...... 5 1.4. Age Structure of the County ...... 6 1.5. Age Structure of the Townships ...... 8 1.6. Population Growth in Ontario ...... 9 1.7. Net Migration by Age Cohort in the County ...... 11 1.8. Population Growth by Township ...... 13 1.9. Population Growth in Population Centres ...... 14 1.10. Population Growth in Adjacent Municipalities ...... 15

Page 105 of 253 Appendix I – Calculation of Population Undercount ...... 18 Appendix II – Calculation of Mortality Rate ...... 19 Appendix III – Ontario Census Division Population Growth ...... 20 Appendix IV – Statistics Canada Population Centres ...... 22

| County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis i

Note on Definitions and Geography

Census Division (CD): Group of neighbouring municipalities joined Areas (CMAs) and Census Divisions (CDs), and are normally together for the purposes of regional planning and managing between the range of 3% and 4%. common services (such as police or ambulance services). In 2006 the undercoverage rate for the Peterborough Census Peterborough Census Division includes the eight Townships of Division was 3.4%. the County of Peterborough as well as the City of Peterborough, and the Hiawatha and Curve Lake First Nations. Census Metropolitan Area (CMA): An area consisting of one or more neighbouring municipalities situated around a core. A census metropolitan area must have a total population of at least 100,000 of which 50,000 or more live in the core. Peterborough CMA includes the City of Peterborough; the Townships of Otonabee-South Monaghan, Cavan-Monaghan, Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield, and Douro-Dummer; and the Hiawatha and Curve Lake First Nations Population Centre: Area with a population of at least 1,000 and no fewer than 400 persons per square kilometre. Population Centres are divided into three categories: • small population centres, with a population between 1,000 and 29,999 • medium population centres, with a population between 30,000 and 99,999 • large urban population centres, with a population Page 106 of 253 of 100,000 or more. Undercoverage Rate: As the Census inevitably misses some members of the population while counting others more than once, this leads to minor discrepancies between the census population and the actual population. Accordingly, Statistics Canada conducts postcensal coverage studies to estimate the true population of an area. These estimates are released at the national and provincial levels, as well as for Census Metropolitan Note on Definitions and Geography | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis ii

Executive Summary

The County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis: 2011 Census has population growth; however, only Lakefield witnessed positive been prepared by the County’s Planning Department to help growth at 1.1%. decision makers understand the population trends within the The population change in the County of Peterborough was not County and how these trends relate to the surrounding areas. consistent among all age cohorts. There was a net out-migration of Accordingly this report is designed to be descriptive rather than individuals 65 and over as well as among individuals between 15 prescriptive in its analysis. and 29, with the largest out-migration among those aged 20-24 Between 2006 and 2011 the population of the County of which witnessed a 29% decline based on the expected 2011 Peterborough declined by approximately 3.1%. However, as a population. portion of this decline is attributable to population change that There was a net in-migration among individuals between the ages of resulted from the 2008 annexation of lands to the City of 5 and 14 and 30 and 64, with those of the latter age bracket Peterborough, the actual loss, based on consistent 2011 municipal accounting for 80% of the net in-migration, or 1,220. Individuals boundaries, was more modest at 2.2%. living in the County born since the last census, 2,390, outnumbered The declining growth rate witnessed in the County of Peterborough the number of individuals that can be anticipated to have died since since the last census is in line with a general slowdown in the rate of the last census, 2,240; however, the larger effect of out-migration growth across Ontario which decreased from 6.6% between 2001 vis-à-vis in-migration resulted in the County’s net decrease in and 2006 to 5.7% between 2006 and 2011. Additionally, over the population. last census, the number of Ontario Census Divisions which With the exception of the City of Peterborough, these population witnessed population decline doubled from 7 to 14. Where the effects, the out-migration of retirement-aged and university-aged population did increase within the Province since 2006, the vast individuals, were also witnessed in the upper and single tier majority, 99%, occurred in the Province’s Census Metropolitan municipalities adjacent to the County of Peterborough. One key Areas (CMAs), including Peterborough CMA, of which 80% was difference, however, is that while there begins to be a net out- located in the ‘large urban’ population centres located within CMAs. migration of individuals over 65 from the County of Peterborough, Within the County of Peterborough, the population decline was this effect is not witnessed until 70 or 75 in the adjacent Page 107 of 253 consistent across the eight Townships, ranging from a high of 4.9% municipalities. (Asphodel-Norwood) to a low of 1.1% (Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield) when based on consistent 2011 boundaries. The County’s four serviced settlement areas of Lakefield, Havelock, Norwood and Millbrook (as delineated by the Statistics Canada Population Centres in which they are located) outperformed the remainder of the Townships in which they are located in terms of

Executive Summary | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis iii

1. Demographic Overview 1.1. County and Townships 2011 Population

The County of Peterborough’s population in 2011 was approximately 56,700. This estimate is based on the 2011 census population of Fig. County of Peterborough 54,870 for the eight townships of the County of Peterborough and 1 Population by Township (2011) adjusted based on the 2006 undercoverage rate. 2,368 Population estimates for the 4% 2011 Census are not The County of Peterborough’s anticipated until September Asphodel- 2013. Accordingly, the 2006 population was approximately Norwood 4,178 undercoverage rates are used 7% 56,700 in 2011. Havelock-Belmont- whenever referring to the Smith-Ennismore- Methuen Lakefield 4,679 2011 population which, for the 17,419 8% Peterborough Census Division, was 3.4%. Unless explicitly stated as 31%

the “census population”, all references to population have been Galway-Cavendish adjusted for the undercoverage rate of the respective Census Division and Harvey 5,279 for the year cited. 9% Within the County of Peterborough, Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield is the

most populated Township (17,419), as shown in Fig. 1, followed by Otonabee-South Cavan-Monaghan (8,893). Taken together, these two Townships Monaghan 6,887 Cavan-Monaghan account for almost half of the County’s population. Douro-Dummer 12% 8,893 16% (7,037) and Otonabee-South Monaghan (6,887) follow with each Douro-Dummer Township accounting for approximately 12% of the County’s 7,037 13%

Page 108 of 253 population. Galway-Cavendish and Harvey (5,279), Havelock- Belmont-Methuen (4,679), and Asphodel-Norwood (4,178) are each in the range of 8% of the County total, while North Kawartha has the

smallest population (2,368), at approximately 4%.

Fig. 2 on the following page shows the Census Population for each township since 1981. As these figures represent the unadjusted census counts, the numbers do not coincide with Fig. 1 (right) which have been adjusted to account for the undercoverage.

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 1

Fig. Census Population (1981-2011)

2 60,000

50,000

40,000 North Kawartha

30,000 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey

20,000 Havelock-Belmont- Methuen

10,000 Douro-Dummer

Smith-Ennismore- Lakefield - 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 Asphodel-Norwood Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield 13,132 14,063 15,836 16,107 16,414 17,413 16,846

Cavan-Monaghan 6,045 6,540 8,068 8,252 8,453 8,828 8,601 - 1981

Page 109 of 253 Douro-Dummer 5,514 5,524 6,269 6,684 6,652 6,954 6,805 - 1986 Otonabee-South Otonabee-South 5,600 5,712 6,627 6,584 6,669 6,934 6,660 - 1991 Monaghan Monaghan - 1996 Galway-Cavendish and Cavan-Monaghan 2,585 2,867 3,873 4,400 4,372 5,284 5,105 Harvey - 2001 Havelock-Belmont- 3,660 3,809 4,073 4,327 4,479 4,637 4,523 - 2006 Methuen - 2011 Asphodel-Norwood 2,990 3,087 3,897 4,080 3,985 4,247 4,041 North Kawartha 1,605 1,763 1,938 2,104 2,144 2,342 2,289 County of Peterborough 41,131 43,365 50,581 52,538 53,168 56,639 54,870

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 2

1.2. Occupied Households & Household Size

In addition to a declining population since the last census, the 2011 Fig. Census also revealed an odd situation whereby the number of ‘total private dwellings’ also declined. Through correspondence with 3 Private Dwellings by Tenure (2011) 100% 1,032 2,240 1,950 2,558 6,660 2,519 1,567 3,097 Statistics Canada staff in the preparation of this report, the anomaly 21,623 was explained as being a result of errors in data collection during the 90% 2006 Census. While population counts were not affected; inconsistent application of the listing procedures for private and 80% collective dwellings in 2006 led to an inflated count of private 70% dwellings for certain areas, including the County of Peterborough, 60% with high concentration of seasonal cottages where collective dwellings were incorrectly classified as private dwellings. The 50% Private Dwellings individual units (recreational trailers, tourist cottages, rooms in 40% rooming houses) in collective dwellings were sometimes counted as occupied by usual both private dwellings and parts of a single collective, and thus the 30% residents error only affected the counts of total private dwellings from the 20% 2,457 3,047 1,797 1,346 9,844 Private Dwellings 2006 Census and it did not affect the count of private dwellings 552 332 189 124 10% occupied by usual residents. As such, 2006 private dwelling data has unoccupied or occupied 0% only by Temporary been omitted. North Kawartha Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Havelock-Belmont-Methuen Douro-Dummer Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield Otonabee-South Monaghan Asphodel-Norwood Cavan-Monaghan Peterborough County of residents Between 2001 and 2011 the number of private dwellings occupied by usual residents as a percent of total private dwellings increased in the County of Peterborough from 65% to 69%. The remainder of these private dwellings (35% in 2001 and 31% in 2011) are either unoccupied or occupied by temporary residents only.

Page 110 of 253 As shown in Fig. 3 the large variation in the extent of cottage residences among the eight Townships is readily apparent as indicated by the percent of unoccupied private dwellings. This ranged from a low of 4% in to a high of 70% in North Kawartha. size for the City of Peterborough, but lower than that of the Province The average household size for the County of Peterborough in 2011 as a whole. This also represented a decrease from the 2006 levels was 2.51 persons per household which is greater than the household which was a decline of approximately 2% for the County, City, and Province. Notabily, the higher rates were witnessed in the Townships

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 3

which form the Peterborough CMA; those of Otonabee-South Monaghan, Cavan-Monaghan, Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield, and Douro-Dummer. The higher persons per household counts are not however the result of fewer unoccupied residences (or residences temporary Persons Per Region Household 2006 2011 County of Peterborough 2.57 2.51 Asphodel-Norwood 2.53 2.50 Cavan-Monaghan 2.86 2.71 Douro-Dummer 2.72 2.64 Galway-Cavendish and Harvey 2.36 2.26 Havelock-Belmont-Methuen 2.35 2.32 North Kawartha 2.21 2.19 Otonabee-South Monaghan 2.69 2.62 Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield 2.57 2.51 City of Peterborough 2.33 2.28 Ontario 2.63 2.59 occupied by temporary residents only) in the Peterborough CMA Township: the number of Persons Per Household is calculated as the total number of persons in private households (a number which excludes the institutional population such as group homes and

Page 111 of 253 prisons) divided by the total private dwellings occupied by usual residents and does not factor in unoccupied dwellings.

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 4

1.3. Median Age of the County

In 2011 the median age of the County of Peterborough was 48.7; in As the chart below illustrates, the rate of increase in median age has contrast the Province as a whole had a median age of 40.4 while the been remarkably consistent across townships over the timeframe City of Peterborough had a median age of 43. As shown in Fig. 4, the analyzed. difference between the Province and County has grown steadily since 2001 when the difference in median age was 5.8 years, to the current Fig. Median Age by Township difference of 8.4 years. In contrast, the City of Peterborough has 5 (2001-2011) maintained a consistent differential of about 2.5 years. 60 Fig. Median Age of County, City, and Province 4 (2001-2011) Asphodel-Norwood 55 50 49 Cavan-Monaghan 46 45 43 County of 50 Douro-Dummer 43 42 Peterborough 40 Galway-Cavendish and 40 City of Harvey 40 Peterborough 39 45 Havelock-Belmont- 37 Methuen 35 Province of Ontario North Kawartha 40 30 Otonabee-South 2001 2006 2011 Monaghan

Smith-Ennismore- Within the County, the Townships with the highest median age are Lakefield

Page 112 of 253 35 North Kawartha (54.6), followed by Galway-Cavendish and Harvey County of Peterborough (54), and Havelock-Belmont-Methuen (46.4). The Townships with the lowest median age are Cavan-Monaghan (45.9), Douro-Dummer (46.2), and Asphodel-Norwood (46.8); while Smith-Ennismore- 30 2001 2006 2011 Lakefield and Otonabee-South Monaghan round out the middle with median ages of 49 and 47.6 respectively (Fig. 5).

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 5

1.4. Age Structure of the County

The County’s high median age is a result of the large proportion of late-career and early-retirement individuals and a low proportion of Fig. Population Pyramid for Ontario and

university-aged individuals as compared to the province as a whole 6 County of Peterborough (2011) (Fig. 6). The largest differences in age distribution between the

Province and the County are amongst individuals near retirement age, 85 years and over 2% 2% in the 60 to 64 and 65 to 69 age brackets. On the flip side of this, the

County is under-represented by age cohorts younger than 45 with the 80 to 84 years 2% 2%

largest differential among university aged and early-career individuals 65 Years and Over 75 to 79 years 4% 3% in the 25 to 29 and 30 to 34 age brackets. Peterborough: 20% 70 to 74 years 5% 3% Ontario: 15% Overall, the percent of working age population (15-64) in the County is only slightly lower than the Province as a whole; whereas the 65 to 69 years 7% 4% County’s working age population represents 66% of the total 60 to 64 years 9% 6% population, the proportion of the Province’s working age population is 68%. However, the small overall difference in working age 55 to 59 years 9% 7% population is the result of a relatively larger proportion of age cohorts 50 to 54 years 9% 8% 35 to 65 Years approaching the end of their career within the County. The relatively 45 to 49 years 8% 8% Peterborough: 46% large difference among late-career individuals compensates for Ontario: 42% relatively lower proportions of individuals in the County that are at 40 to 44 years 6% 7% the early and middle stages of their careers, aged 20 to 39. 35 to 39 years 5% 7%

One of the implications of lower shares of individuals in the 25-29 and 30 to 34 years 4% 6% 30-34 age cohorts is that these age cohorts have the highest birth 20 to 34 Years

rates as shown in Fig. 7 (following page). Accordingly, low 25 to 29 years 4% 6% Peterborough: 13%

proportions of these individuals, and high proportions of individuals Ontario: 19% 20 to 24 years 5% 7% Page 113 of 253 outside of child-bearing age, suggests the County will be more

dependant on migration to replace its ageing population than through 15 to 19 years 6% 7%

natural increase alone. 10 to 14 years 5% 6% 0 to 19 Years Peterborough: 20% As shown in Fig. 8, age cohorts over 45 have made up a consistently 5 to 9 years 4% 6% Ontario: 24% increasing share of the County’s population since 1981, whereas 0 to 4 years 4% 5% individuals younger than 45 have constituted a consistently smaller County of Peterborough share of the County’s population. The largest decrease in the share of 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% Province of Ontario

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 6

the County’s population was among individuals associated with the Fig. highest fertility rates (25-34), declining 6% from 14% in 1981 to 8% in County of Peterborough Age Distribution 2011 – a 45% decline over 1981 levels. This decline was mirrored by a 8 (1981-2011) 2% decline in the 0-4 age cohort, from 7% to 4% - a 36% decline over 100% 1981 levels. 12% 14% 16% 90% 20% Fig. Ontario Age-Specific Fertility Rate (2010) 7 12% 80% 11% 120 106.1 13% 11% 100 70% 18% 84.9 12% 80 65+ 16% 60% 13% 55 to 64 60 54.9 Live Births per 16% 45 to 54 38.6 1,000 Females 17% 40 50% 35 to 44 14% 16% 20 10.5 10.9 25 to 34 0.5 40% 14% 15 to 24 0 10% 5 to 14 15 to 20 to 25 to 30 to 35 to 40 to 45 to 9% 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 16% 30% 8% 0 to 4 12% Source: Statistics Canada, CANSIM Table 102-4505 12% 20% 12% Page 114 of 253 The largest change in the share of the County’s population since 1981 16% in both absolute percentage change, and percent change over 1981 14% 10% 14% levels were amongst age cohorts over 45: individuals 45-54 increased 10% by 6.6% from 11% to 17% (up 62% from 1981 proportions), the share 7% 7% 4% 4% of individuals 55-64 increased by 6.8% from 12% to 18% (up 53% over 0% 1981 proportions); and, individuals over 65 increased 8.8% from 12% 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011

to 20% (up 76% over 1981 proportions).

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 7

1.5. Age Structure of the Townships

As the more populated Townships have a greater effect on County the adult cohorts is more variegated, ranging from 50-54 (OSM, CM, wide averages, the population pyramids for each of the Townships AN) to 60-64 (GCH, HBM, NK), while for two others (DD, SEL) the spike have been separated (Fig. 9) to highlight the circumstances unique to is amongst the 55-59 age cohorts. As each cohort ages into each area. Within every township there appears to be two spikes in retirement, it can be anticipated that these peaks will work their way the population, one of which is consistent among all Townships through each Township at slightly time periods, and with varying representing youth aged 15-19. The second spike, however, amongst intensity, as indicated on the graph below.

Fig. 9

Page 115 of 253

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 8

1.6. Population Growth in Ontario Fig. Census Division Population Growth/Decline 10 (2001-2006 & 2006-2011) Since the last census the County of Peterborough’s population has decreased slightly from, an undercount adjusted, population of 58,569 in 2006 to 56,739 in 2011, a decline of 3.1%. As mentioned above however, some of this decline can be attributed to the annexation of lands to the City of Peterborough in 2008. Based on consistent, post annexation, boundaries the decline since 2006 is more modest at 2.2%. While the slight decline in population within the County of Peterborough, is in part, attributed to the ageing population, the decline is also reflective of a general slowdown in the population growth, and a broadening of population decline, across Ontario since 2006. Ontario’s population growth slowed to 5.7% over the 2006-2011 period as compared to 6.6% over the 2001-2006 period. Additionally, almost a third of Ontario’s Census Divisions (CDs) experienced a decline in population over the 2006-2011 period. Between 2001 and 2006 there were only 7 Census Divisions experiencing population decline, with these areas focused primarily in the Northeast (4 CDs) and Northwest (2 CDs) while only one Census Division experienced population decline in the Southwest. Over the 2006-2011 period the number of Census Divisions experiencing population decline doubled to 14, including all CDs which witnessed decline over the prior period and broadened to include more of the Southwest (4 CDs) and

Page 116 of 253 Northwest (3 CDs), as well as parts of the East (1 CD) and Central (1 CD) areas of the province as shown in Fig. 10 (see Appendix I for complete list). Between 2006 and 2011 the Province’s population increased by approximately 692,000. Almost the entirety of this growth, 683,000 Census Divisions experiencing population decline in 2001-2006 & 2006-2011 (99%), occurred in the Province’s Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs), Census Divisions experiencing population decline in 2006-2011 only Census Divisions experiencing population growth in 2001-2006 & 2006-2011

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 9

including the Peterborough CMA (City of Peterborough, the Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) & townships of Otonabee-South Monaghan, Cavan-Monaghan, Smith- Fig.

Ennismore-Lakefield, and Douro-Dummer, and the Hiawatha and 11 ‘Large Urban’ Population Centres of Ontario Curve Lake First Nations), shown in Fig. 11. However, even among CMAs, the vast majority of this growth was concentrated in the ‘large urban’ population centres, which accounted for 80% of the population growth within the CMAs.

Thunder Bay

‘Large Urban’ Population Centres Population Centres Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) Page 117 of 253

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 10

1.7. Net Migration by Age Cohort in the County

As mentioned above, the County of Peterborough lost about 1,300 out-migration. Accordingly, the extent of migration into the county is permanent residents, or about 2.2% of its population based on marginally under estimated in this analysis while migration out of the consistent 2011 boundaries, or 1,830 based on boundaries as they County is marginally over estimated. existed. Population change since the last census can be broken into its Whereas there were slightly more individuals born than died since the three component parts: births, deaths, and net migration. last census; there was a net out-migration of approximately 2,000 Based on the age structure of the County in 2006 a decline of permanent residents. Broken down by age however; the County approximately 2,240 individuals can be anticipated as a result of age- managed to attract a net in-migration of 1,220 residents aged 30-64. specific mortality rates (Appendix II). Balancing this out, there were This represented a growth rate of 4%, and accounted for 80% of the approximately 2,390 individuals within the County born since the last net in-migration. Of these individuals, the 30 to 34 age cohort had census. The remainder of the population change is the net effect of the highest growth rate at about 7% with a net in-migration of in-migration and out-migration as shown in Fig. 12. approximately 140. Parallel to this trend, there was a net in-migration of individuals aged 5-14 The extent of in-migration and out-migration was not consistent Population Increase & totalling approximately Fig. across age cohorts. Fig. 13 (following page) shows the anticipated 300 or about 6% 12 Decrease by Cause 2011 population (red) for each age cohort based on the number of growth over the (2006-2011) individuals in 2006 census, aged by 5 years, and adjusted for the anticipated population. mortality rate specific to each age cohort. The difference between The two groups, 5-14 Increase Increase Increase 30 to 64; the anticipated population and the observed 2011 population, listed attributed attributed to 1,220; and 30-64 saw to a to births†; in- 80% above the bar chart, shows the extent of migration into (positive migration; 2,390; 5 to 14; total increase of 1,520. 1,520; numbers), or out of (negative numbers), the County for each age 61% 300; 39% cohort. In contrast to the influx 20%

Page 118 of 253 of young and middle It should be noted that some portion of individuals born since the last aged individuals, there

census will have come from outside of the County; however, net Decrease Decrease 15 to 29; was a net out- Decrease migration has not been calculated for the 0-4 age group and is shown attributed to 2,130; migration totalling attributed out- 60% 65 and here as being equal to the 2011 population. Similarly, because the to deaths; migration††; 3,520 amongst age 2,240; over;

3,520; population is based on municipal boundaries as they existed in each 1,390; groups 15-29 and 65 39% 61% period, the population loss from boundary adjustments (525) is not 40% and over. factored into the calculation, and appears here as a component of † - Includes in-migration of individuals aged 0-4 †† - Includes annexed population

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 11

Unsurprisingly, the largest out-migration was amongst university aged increase with age: while there was a slight decrease of 120 amongst individuals: there was a decline of 29% (1,190) amongst those aged those aged 65-69 (3% out-migration), this increased to 390 for those 20-24, and 24% (740) amongst those aged 25-29. Taken together, 80-84 (23% out-migration), and 290 for those 85 and over (22% out- those aged 15-30 accounted for 60% of all out-migration from the migration). County. The other 40% of out-migration came from retirement aged

individuals, those 65 and over. The extent of out-migration tended to

Fig. 13 County of Peterborough Net Migration by Age Cohort (2006-2011) 6,000

200 200 190 5,000 180 Observed2011 Population 2011 Population -120 -1,190 Anticipated 2011 Population (based on 2006 census and 4,000 -200 age-specific mortality rates) 160 140 -740 -260 3,000 160 - 160 -330 -390 -290 140 2,000 -390 -290

1,000 Page 119 of 253

- 0 to 5 to 10 to 15 to 20 to 25 to 30 to 35 to 40 to 45 to 50 to 55 to 60 to 65 to 70 to 75 to 80 to 85 + 4 9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 74 79 84

5-14 15-29 30-64 65 and over 20% of 60% of 80% of 40% of in-migration out-migration in-migration out-migration

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 12

1.8. Population Growth by Township

The extent of population decline within the County was relatively Fig. consistent across the eight townships. Based on consistent 2011 Total Population by Township Township boundaries (ie. using the post-2008 annexation boundaries 15 (1996-2011) for both periods), the extent of population decline since 2006 ranged 20,000 from a high of 4.9% (Asphodel-Norwood) to a low of 1.1% (Smith- Ennismore-Lakefield). This bucks the historic trend of moderate growth within the County of Peterborough. Fig. 14, below, shows the 18,000 population growth rate since 1996 for each of the Townships as well as that of the County as a whole, while Fig. 15 highlights the total Asphodel-Norwood population. 16,000

Cavan-Monaghan Fig. Population Growth by Township 14,000 14 (1996-2011) Douro-Dummer 25% 12,000 County County County Asphodel-Norwood Rate Rate Rate 2.4% 6.0% -2.2% Galway-Cavendish 20% Cavan-Monaghan 10,000 and Harvey Havelock-Belmont- Douro-Dummer Methuen 15% 8,000 North Kawartha Galway-Cavendish and 10% Harvey 6,000 Otonabee-South Havelock-Belmont- Monaghan Methuen Page 120 of 253 5% 4,000 Smith-Ennismore- North Kawartha Lakefield

0% Otonabee-South 2,000 Monaghan Smith-Ennismore- -5% - Lakefield 1996-2001 2001-2006 2006-2011 1996 2001 2006 2011

Note: Population growth for the 2006-2011 period is based on 2011 Township boundaries for both periods. Adjustment associated with the annexation resulted in a census population decline of 122 in OSM (-4.0% total), and 386 in SEL (-3.3% total). Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 13

1.9. Population Growth in Population Centres

Within the County there are four municipally serviced settlement Lakefield reduced the effect of decline in the remainder of the areas which include Lakefield, Millbrook, Havelock, and Norwood. Township. Within these four settlement areas are the County’s delineated built- In the Millbrook and Norwood population centres the population up areas as prescribed by the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden declined, but at a lower rate than the remainder of the townships in Horseshoe. By the year 2015 and for each year thereafter, a which they are located. Havelock, witnessed the same rate of minimum of 40 per cent of all residential development occurring population decline as the remainder of the Township of Havelock- annually within the County must be within these built-up areas.1 Belmont-Methuen at 2.4%. Although detailed data has not been compiled for these settlement Taken as a whole the population centres within the County lost 1.3% areas or the built boundaries within each, Statistics Canada provides of their population as compared to a 2.3% decline in areas of the four data on what it terms “population centres” which are areas with a Townships outside of the population centres, and 2.2% in the County minimum population of 1,000 and a minimum density of 400 persons as a whole. per square kilometre and include each of the County’s serviced settlement areas. Statistics Canada’s population centres roughly Fig. County of Peterborough 'Population Centres' coincide with the boundaries of the settlement areas and for the purposes of this report have been highlighted here to help illustrate 16 Population (1996-2011) the demographic trends acting upon these areas. 3,000 Taken together these four population centres had a total population of 7,144 (Fig. 16), accounting for approximately 13% of the County’s 2,500 population in 2011, and 20% of the population of the four Townships in which the population centres are located. 2,000 Between 2006 and 2011 the Lakefield population centre increased in Lakefield population by 0.7%. In contrast the remainder of the Township 1,500 Millbrook witnessed a decline of 1.4% outside of Lakefield (based on consistent Page 121 of 253 Havelock 2011 boundaries). Note that the decline of 1.4% is larger than the 1,000 1.1% decline cited above for SEL as a whole; population growth in Norwood

500

1 The Minister of Infrastructure may review and permit an alternative minimum intensification target for an upper- or single-tier municipality - located within the outer ring to ensure the intensification target is 1996 2001 2006 2011 appropriate given the size, location and capacity of built-up areas.

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 14

1.10. Population Growth in Adjacent Municipalities

Since the last census, upper and single tier municipalities adjacent to Fig. Population Growth in Adjacent Municipalities the County of Peterborough faced similar population challenges of (1996-2011) low and declining growth rates, and even population decline. 17 Both the City of Kawartha Lakes and the County of Peterborough witnessed a decline in population (Fig. 17) since 2006. Over the period analyzed, the only other municipality to wintess a decline was -0.3% 5.7% 5.4% the County of Haliburton between 1996 and 2001 which decreased by 0.3%. The City of Peterborough and the County of Hastings did however manage to increase the rate of growth since the last census, with the City of Peterborough showing a stable rate of growth. County of Haliburton The County of Haliburton had the highest growth at 5.4%, but magnitude of this increase is in part due the low population base allowing small changes in population to make significant differences 2.0% 0.8% 2.4% in the rate of growth. In absolute growth the number of new 2.4% 6.0% -2.2% County of residents was the lowest of municipalities experiencing growth, at Hastings 902. 3.2% 6.8% -1.8% Excepting the City of Peterborough, the adjacent municipality to witness an increase in the rate of growth was which County of increased from 0.8% growth between 2001 and 2006 to 2.4% Peterborough between 2006 and 2011. Again, with the exception of the City of City of Kawartha Lakes Peterborough, Hastings County is the youngest of adjacent municipalities (average age 47.6) and within that 76% of the population growth occurred in the youngest half of the County’s 5.3% 3.6% 1.5% Page 122 of 253 twelve townships. The net-migration broken down by age cohort for the five adjacent 3.7% 4.3% 4.4% County of municipalities and the County of Peterborough are shown on the Northumberland following pages (Fig. 18) which shows the percent over/under the 1996-2001 City of anticipated 2011 population for that age cohort based on age-specific Peterborough 2001-2006 survival rates, as discussed in Section 1.6. 2006-2011

Note : Population growth for the County of Peterborough and City of Peterborough between 2006 and 2011 is based on consistent 2011 boundaries.

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 15

As is immediately clear, the City of Peterborough stands unique City of Peterborough appears to attract strong levels of in-migration among the municipalities adjacent to the County of Peterborough. In amongst older age cohorts. Some of the highest growth rates for the contrast to the out-migration of 15-19 and 20-24 age cohorts in every City of Peterborough are amongst those individuals in their other region, the City of Peterborough, through the presence of Trent retirmement years; witnessing 8% growth through in-migration University and Flemming College, manages to attract in-migration of amongst the 65-69 age cohort and 7% growth amongst those 75-79. 15% and 24% respectively. Conversely there is an out-migration of In contrast, the County of Peterborough has witnessed a net out- graduating students in age cohorts 25-29 (14% of anticipated migration of individuals of every age cohort over 65, while other population) and to a lesser extent amongst age cohorts 30-34 (1%). adjacent municipalities have witnessed the same out-migration albeit The other key difference between City of Peterborough and the starting at a slightly older age. County of Peterborough and other adjacent municipalities is that the

Percent Migration by Age Cohort – County and Adjacent Municipalities Fig. 18 City of Peterborough County of Peterborough 7,000 6,000 24% 4% 4% -14% 4% 4% 6,000 6% 4% 4% 15% 6% 5,000 -29% -3% 5,000 -1% 4% -5% 6% 4,000 7% 8% 5% 4,000 6% 5% 5% 7% -24% 6% -8% 3% 4% 3,000 7% 3,000 7% -13% 2,000 -23% 2,000 -22% Page 123 of 253 1,000 1,000 - -

2011 Population Anticipated 2011 Population 2011 Population Anticipated 2011 Population

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 16

Percent Migration by Age Cohort – County and Adjacent Municipalities (cont.) County of Haliburton County of Hastings 9% 9% 2,000 27% 27% 4,000 12% 1,800 22% 4% 13% 3,500 1,600 -30% 3,000 -5% 2% 1,400 14% 1% 8% 2,500 10% 1,200 -28% -4% 7% 9% -4% 0% -6% 10% 1,000 14% 2,000 -11% -9% 800 5% -8% 5% 13% 1,500 600 10% -10% -13% -8% 1,000 400 200 500 - -

2011 Population Anticipated 2011 Population 2011 Population Anticipated 2011 Population

City of Kawartha Lakes County of Northumberland

7,000 3% 8,000 6% 4% 15% 2% 8% 5% 9% 6,000 7,000 -5% -25% 7% -25% 5,000 6,000 -1% 12% -15% 1% 1% -2% 5,000 8% 5% 4,000 2% 7% -15% 2% 4% -7% 8% 7% -2% -12% 4,000 7% 3,000 -9% -9% 3,000 -11% 2,000 2,000 Page 124 of 253 1,000 1,000 - -

2011 Population Anticipated 2011 Population 2011 Population Anticipated 2011 Population

Demographic Overview | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 17

Appendix I – Calculation of Population Undercount

Postcensal Census Net Year Population Population Undercoverage Estimate 1996 74,437 76,478 2.7% Northumberland 2001 77,497 80,516 3.9% (Census Division) 2006 80,963 83,523 3.2% 2011 82,126 - 3.2% 1996 67,926 69,748 2.7% Kawartha Lakes 2001 69,179 72,003 4.1% (Census Division) 2006 74,561 76,920 3.2% 2011 73,214 - 3.2% 1996 126,099 130,874 3.8% Hastings 2001 125,915 132,229 5.0% (Census Division) 2006 130,474 136,586 4.7% 2011 134,934 - 4.7% 1996 15,321 15,728 2.7%

Haliburton 2001 15,085 15,682 4.0% (Census Division) 2006 16,147 16,572 2.6% Page 125 of 253 2011 17,026 - 2.6% 1996 123,448 126,817 2.7% Peterborough 2001 125,856 130,852 4.0% (Census Division) 2006 133,080 137,614 3.4% 2011 134,933 - 3.4%

Appendix I – Calculation of Population Undercount | County of Peterborough Demographic 18 Analysis

Appendix II – Calculation of Mortality Rate Average 2006 2007 2008 2009 2006-2009 Canada, place of residence Age-standardized mortality rate per 100,000 population 540.5 539.8 531.3 515.0 531.7 Ontario, place of residence Age-standardized mortality rate per 100,000 population 528.2 525.6 512.7 499.7 516.6 Ontario as % of Canada Wide 97.7% 97.4% 96.5% 97.0% 97.2%

Canada Age- Adjusted Ontario Age Specific Mortality Rate at 97.2% Rate per 100,000

1 to 4 17 17 5 to 9 10 10 10 to 14 12 11 15 to 19 39 38 20 to 24 52 51 25 to 29 56 54 30 to 34 65 63 35 to 39 85 83 40 to 44 130 126 45 to 49 210 204 50 to 54 336 326

Page 126 of 253 55 to 59 504 490 60 to 64 783 761 65 to 69 1,248 1,213 70 to 74 1,989 1,932 75 to 79 3,320 3,226 80 to 84 5,662 5,501 85 to 89 9,613 9,339 90 and over 18,751 18,218 Source: Statistics Canada, Canadian Vital Statistics, Births and Deaths Databases and Appendix II of the publication “Mortality Summary List of Causes”

Appendix II – Calculation of Mortality Rate | County of Peterborough Demographic Analysis 19

Appendix III – Ontario Census Division Population Growth

Population Population Population Population Region & Census Division Change Change Region & Census Division Change Change 2006-11 2001-06 2006-11 2001-06 Central 3.2% 6.4% GTA 10.9% 13.7% Brant 8.7% 5.6% Durham 8.4% 10.7% Dufferin 4.5% 6.7% Halton 14.2% 17.1% Haldimand-Norfolk 1.2% 3.0% Peel 11.9% 17.2% Haliburton 5.4% 7.0% Toronto 4.5% 0.9% Hamilton 3.1% 2.9% York 15.7% 22.4% Kawartha Lakes -1.8% 7.8% Northeast -0.2% -0.5% Muskoka 0.8% 8.4% Algoma -1.4% -0.9% Niagara 0.9% 4.1% Cochrane -1.7% -3.2% Northumberland 1.4% 4.5% 1.6% 1.7% Peterborough 1.4% 5.7% Manitoulin -0.3% 3.2% Simcoe 5.7% 12.0% Nipissing 0.1% 2.1% Waterloo 6.1% 9.0% Parry Sound 3.0% 3.2% Wellington 4.0% 7.0% Sudbury -0.9% -6.6% East 3.3% 3.0% Timiskaming -1.9% -3.4% Frontenac 4.1% 3.8% Northwest -6.0% 0.2% Hastings 3.4% 3.6% Kenora -10.6% 4.2% Lanark 3.0% 2.1% Rainy River -5.5% -2.5% Page 127 of 253 Leeds and Grenville 0.1% 2.7% Thunder Bay -2.0% -1.2% Lennox and Addington 3.2% 2.7% 8.8% 4.9%

Prescott and Russell 6.5% 4.9% Prince Edward -0.9% 2.4% Renfrew 3.9% 2.5% Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry 0.7% 0.8%

Appendix III – Ontario Census Division Population Growth | County of Peterborough 20 Demographic Analysis

Population Population Region & Census Division Change Change 2006-11 2001-06 Southwest 0.4% 2.6% Bruce 1.2% 2.3% Chatham-Kent -4.2% 0.8% Elgin 2.5% 4.7% Essex -1.2% 4.9% Grey 0.2% 3.7% Huron -0.4% -0.6% Lambton -1.6% 1.0% Middlesex 4.0% 4.7% Oxford 2.9% 3.5% Perth 1.0% 0.9%

Page 128 of 253

Appendix III – Ontario Census Division Population Growth | County of Peterborough 21 Demographic Analysis

Appendix IV – Statistics Canada Population Centres Page 129 of 253

Appendix IV – Statistics Canada Population Centres | County of Peterborough Demographic 22 Analysis

Page 130 of 253 The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Lynn Fawn, Deputy Clerk/Office Supervisor

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: Correspondence Report – Information Only

Recommendation: Receive for information.

Financial Impact: None

Overview:

Since the January 9, 2012 meeting of Council, the Information Only Correspondence items listed below have been received. Copies are available upon request from the Clerk’s Office. Copies being provided are indicated by an asterisk (*).

General Correspondence

1. Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) Communications: 1. AMO Watch File dated January 10, 2013.* 2. AMO Watch File dated January 17, 2013.* 3. Email dated January 9, 2013 announcing the “Big City – Small City, 2013 AMO Urban Symposium” taking place April 18 & 19, 2013. For further details and registration information visit www.amo.on.ca 2. Township of Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield letter dated January 15, 2013 announcing its Council has passed a By-law to officially change its Corporate name to Township of Selwyn. 3. Federal Economic Development Agency for News Release dated January 16, 2013 “Government of Canada Supports Expansion of Peterborough Aviation Company”. 4. Ministry of Community and Social Services email dated January 14, 2013 “Launch of the 2013-14 EnAbling Change Program”. The deadline to submit an application is February 4, 2013. Details on the program are available at www.grants.gov.on.ca/GrantsPortal/en/OntarioGrants/GrantOpportunities/PRDR006997.html

Page 131 of 253 Page 2

5. Ministry of Energy email dated January 15, 2013 providing an update on O.Reg. 397/11 and noting 2 upcoming requirements. 1 - By July 1, 2013: Report to Ministry and publicly post organization’s 2011 energy consumption data. 2 - By July 1, 2014: Update annual energy consumption data and develop and post a 5-year energy conservation and demand management plan. Additional information available by visiting: www.energy.gov.on.ca/en/green-energy-act/conservation-for-public-agencies/ 6. Jeff Leal, MPP – Peterborough letter dated January 7, 2013 providing the response from the Minister of Community and Social Services regarding the impact of provincial funding decreases to benefits for individuals in the community.* 7. County of Peterborough and City of Peterborough joint letter dated January 7, 2013 expressing its appreciation for the government announcement of its one-time additional funding for the development and implementation of the Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI).* 8. City of Peterborough Communications: 1. Email dated January 4, 2013 announcing the Community Training and Development Centre has received funding to run training sessions in animal health care. Details about the program will be provided in an information sessions on February 4, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. as well as on February 5, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. at Scout’s Hall, 109 Ware Street, Peterborough. To reserve a seat call 1-877-749-2832. 2. Email dated January 15, 2013 providing the New Canadian Centre’s event calendar “Talking About Canada”. 3. Email dated January 16, 2013 informing the Province created a new funding program to replace the Healthy Communities Program. Details on the new Ontario Sport and Recreation Communities Fund can be viewed at: www.grants.gov.on.ca/GrantsPortal/en/OntarioGrants/GrantOpportunities/PRDR006918 The Statement of Interest deadline for Provincial projects is February 6, 2013 by 12:00 noon and Local/Regional applications are due by March 19, 2013 at 12:00 noon. 9. YMCA Peterborough Victoria & Haliburton Newsletter dated December 2012 “Nourish Update – What is the Nourish Project?” For further information visit www.nourishproject.ca. 10. Learning Disabilities Association of Peterborough (ldap) Poster and Brochure regarding the “Job Fit Program”. The Job Fit program is designed to specifically address the needs and challenges of unemployed individuals with diagnosed or suspected learning disabilities and/or ADHD, who are 18 years or older. For complete details and registration information contact Jenna at 705-748-9455 x 213 or [email protected] 11. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) letter dated December 20, 2013 acknowledging receipt of the Clerk’s letter regarding the 2013 Year-End Requirements.

Page 132 of 253 Page 3

Communications, Minutes and Reports on County-funded Projects

12. n/a

Information Only Correspondence

13. Schulich School of Business announces upcoming sessions. The Schulich Executive Education Centre of Excellence in Municipal Leadership has designed a three-module professional certificate that will enhance your communication, influence and strategic development capabilities. Module 1 will take place April 4 & 5, 2013 at York University. For further details and registration information visit: www.seec.schulich.yorku.ca/short_program.aspx?id=cd8afc9c-7ecd-41a6-b97d-2043405f22d6 14. Transition Town Peterborough email dated January 14, 2013 providing a poster for the Peterborough International Film Festival taking place January 25th through 27th, 2013. Tickets available online at www.reframefilmfestival.ca. 15. Ontario Onsite Wastewater Association Newsletter dated Fall 2012 Volume 13, Issue 3.

Respectfully submitted,

Original signed by

Lynn Fawn Deputy Clerk/Office Supervisor

/ck

Page 133 of 253 Page 134 of 253 AMO Watch File - January 10, 2013

AMO Watch File not displaying correctly? View the online version | Send to a friend Add [email protected] to your safe list

January 10, 2013 In This Issue - Expert recommendations made to Ontario's Seniors Strategy. - Results of the 2011 Annual Energy Conservation Progress Report. - Complying with Regulation 397/11 as Easy as 1, 2, 3. - Career opportunities with AMO, OCWA and the South Nation Conservation Authority.

Provincial Matters AMO offers initial municipal implications of Dr. Samir Sinha’s Seniors Strategy Report, Living Longer, Living Well. The report provides recommendations on how to help seniors stay healthy and live at home longer. No details are provided on how this strategy is to be funded.

Ontario’s Environmental Commissioner Gord Miller released Volume Two of his 2011 Annual Energy Conservation Progress Report. The report reviews the results of some activities that support energy conservation commitments under the Green Energy Act.

LAS Now is the time to get your data and energy reduction opportunities lined up. LAS has several resources, including free expert energy consultants, to help.

Career Opportunities Policy Intern - AMO. Assisting senior advisors and the Director of Policy, the successful candidate will support AMO’s policy development process. Please apply in confidence to [email protected] by February 1, 2013.

Business Development Managers (eight permanent) - Ontario Clean Water Agency (OCWA). Locations: Across the province. Send a resume, outlining your skills and experience that match our requirements, quoting Job ID 49566, to [email protected] by January 22, 2013.

Engineering Services Director - Ontario Clean Water Agency (OCWA). Location: (GTA). Send a resume, outlining your skills and experience that match our requirements, quoting Job ID 49564, to [email protected] by January 22, 2013.

Energy Efficiency Manager - Ontario Clean Water Agency (OCWA). Location: Greater Toronto Area (GTA). Send a resume, outlining your skills and experience that match our requirements, quoting Job ID 49565, to [email protected] by January 22, 2013.

Watershed Planner - South Nation Conservation Authority. Location: Finch, Ontario. Qualified applicants are invited to email their cover letter and resume by January 25, 2013 to: Nathan Farrell, Watershed Planner, email: [email protected].

About AMO AMO is a non-profit organization representing almost all of Ontario's 444 municipal governments. AMO supports strong and effective municipal government in Ontario and promotes the value of municipal government as a vital and essential component of Ontario's and Canada's political system. Follow @AMOPolicy on Twitter!

AMO Contacts AMO Watch File Team Conferences/Events Policy and Funding Programs Page 135 of 253 http://amo.informz.ca/AMO/archives/archive_270721.html[1/10/2013 2:19:56 PM] AMO Watch File - January 10, 2013

LAS Local Authority Services Limited MEPCO Municipal Employer Pension Centre of Ontario OMKN Ontario Municipal Knowledge Network Media Inquiries Tel: 416.729.5425 Municipal Wire, Career/Employment and Council Resolution Distributions

*Disclaimer: The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) is unable to provide any warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness of third-party submissions. Distribution of these items does not imply an endorsement of the views, information or services mentioned.

Association of Municipalities of Ontario Please consider the environment 200 University Ave. Suite 801,Toronto ON Canada M5H 3C6 before printing this. To unsubscribe, please click here

Page 136 of 253 http://amo.informz.ca/AMO/archives/archive_270721.html[1/10/2013 2:19:56 PM] AMO Watch File - January 17, 2013

AMO Watch File not displaying correctly? View the online version | Send to a friend Add [email protected] to your safe list

January 17, 2013 In This Issue - Ontario Government releases Action Plan for Seniors. - Ontario seeking input on proposed changes to the Fire Code and Building Code. - Ontario Government releases Water Sector and Great Lakes Strategies. - Register today for AMO Urban Symposium. - What are your personal responsibilities as a councillor? - Career opportunities with AMO, Conservation Halton and City of Guelph.

Provincial Matters The Ontario Government launched an Action Plan for Seniors which begins to respond to Dr. Samir Sinha's report on long term care. Of importance to municipalities are measures to create more senior friendly communities through best practices and one-time seed grants, and improved safety and security of seniors through fire safety requirements in long term care homes.

The Ontario Government is seeking public input on proposed changes to Ontario’s Fire Code and Building Code, and implementation of other related actions. The government has posted the proposed changes for public comment until February 28, 2013.

The Strategies contain actions to protect the Great Lakes and promote Ontario water technology. Depending on which actions are implemented, municipal operations could be impacted. AMO will continue to monitor.

Eye on AMO Events The AMO Urban Symposium consistently brings leading edge speakers from other jurisdictions, broader perspectives and ideas to draw from. The 2013 Urban Symposium looks at trends and opportunities shaping the new urban landscape, particularly downtowns in urban centres. Explore the theme of "Big City. Small City." and get a handle on the future in 2013 on April 18th and 19th at the Novotel Mississauga.

Citizens across Ontario are increasing their scrutiny of councils and individual members of council behavior. Coupled with a shift in new personal obligations under the Safe Drinking Water Act, it’s time to learn how to protect your reputation, personal finances and political legacy. Sign up today for AMO’s new course on Personal Responsibilities on February 24th at the Fairmont Royal York, Toronto.

Career Opportunities Policy Intern - AMO. Assisting Senior Advisors and the Director of Policy, the successful candidate will support AMO’s policy development process. Please apply in confidence by email to [email protected], by February 1, 2013.

Administrative Assistant, Policy - AMO. Working in a fast-paced policy environment, you have a minimum of five years related administrative work experience, with a basic understanding of municipal and provincial government structures preferred. Please apply in confidence by email to [email protected], by noon, January 28, 2013.

Environmental Planning Technician (Contract - 12 months) - Conservation Halton. Send your résumé, by January 31st, to: Human Resources, Conservation Halton, 2596 Britannia Road West, Burlington, ON L7P 0G3; Email: [email protected] (please include the job title in subject line).

Senior Advisor, Policy and Intergovernmental Affairs - City of Guelph. Candidates are invited to apply by January 27, 2013 to [email protected]. For more information please visit guelph.ca/careers. Page 137 of 253 http://amo.informz.ca/AMO/archives/archive_272590.html[1/17/2013 12:34:48 PM] AMO Watch File - January 17, 2013

About AMO AMO is a non-profit organization representing almost all of Ontario's 444 municipal governments. AMO supports strong and effective municipal government in Ontario and promotes the value of municipal government as a vital and essential component of Ontario's and Canada's political system. Follow @AMOPolicy on Twitter!

AMO Contacts AMO Watch File Team Conferences/Events Policy and Funding Programs LAS Local Authority Services Limited MEPCO Municipal Employer Pension Centre of Ontario OMKN Ontario Municipal Knowledge Network Media Inquiries Tel: 416.729.5425 Municipal Wire, Career/Employment and Council Resolution Distributions

*Disclaimer: The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) is unable to provide any warranty regarding the accuracy or completeness of third-party submissions. Distribution of these items does not imply an endorsement of the views, information or services mentioned.

Association of Municipalities of Ontario Please consider the environment 200 University Ave. Suite 801,Toronto ON Canada M5H 3C6 before printing this. To unsubscribe, please click here

Page 138 of 253 http://amo.informz.ca/AMO/archives/archive_272590.html[1/17/2013 12:34:48 PM] C4tcP5Crre Jeff Leal, M.P.P. p Peterborough. A Ontario Ce-,, January 7, 2013

c’ Warden J. Murray Jones County of Peterborough 470 Water Street Peterborough, Ontario K9H 3M3

Dear Jay:

I have received a response to my letter dated October 23, 2012 to the Minister of Community and Social Services, the Honourable John Milloy regarding impact of provincial funding decreases to provide benefits to individuals in our community.

I have enclosed a copy of the Minister’s response for your review.

I have also included a copy of the news release my office released December 27, 2012 with regards to additional funding for the City of Peterborough to support the delivery of housing and homelessness programs in our riding.

Daryl Bennett City of Peterborough 500 George Street N. Peterborough, ON K9H 3R9 Councillor Ron Gerow County of Peterborough 1 Ottawa Street P.O. Box 10 Havelock, ON KOL 1ZO Councillor Jim Whelan County of Peterborough 280 Burleigh Street P.O. Box 550 Apsley, ON KOL lAO Councillor Andrew Beamer City of Peterborough 500 George Street N. Peterborough, ON K9H 3R9 Councillor Henry Clarke City of Peterborough 500 George Street N. Peterborough, ON K9H 3R9 Councillor Len Vass City of Peterborough 500 George Street N. Peterborough, ONK9H3R9 Stephen Kylie, Chair Peterborough Poverty Reduction Network P.O. Box 1900 Peterborough, ON K9J 7X7 Mr. JoIm Martyn Peterborough Poverty Reduction Network 1219 Bridle Drive Peterborough, ON K9J 7J7 Andy Mitchell, Deputy Reeve, Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield 1310 Centre Line P.O. Box 270 Bridgenorth, ON KOL 1HO Dr. Rosana Pelizzari Medical Officer of Health County-City Health Unit 10 Hospital Drive Peterborough, ON K9J 8M1 160 Bloor Street East. Suite 400, Toronto, ON M7A 2E6 • T - (416) 325-0534 F - (416) 325-0570 F - [email protected]

236 King Street West, Peterborough, ON K9J 7L8 •T - (705) 742-5777 F - (705) 742-1822 E [email protected]

Page 139 of 253 Ministry of Community Ministère des Services and Social Services sociaux et communautaires

Minister’s Office Bureau du Ministre Hepburn Block Edifice Hepburn Queen’s Park Queen’s Park Toronto ON M7A 1E9 Toronto (Ontario) M7A 1E9 Ontario Tel.: (416) 325-5225 Tél.: (416) 325-5225

DC LJE 142012

Mr. Jeff Leal, MPP Pete rborough 236 King Street West Peterborough, Ontario K9J 7L8

Dear Mr. Leal:

Thank you for your letter and for forwarding the reports concerning social assistance. I

appreciate the time you have taken to share this information and I have provided copies to the appropriate staff in my ministry.

Given the scope of the fiscal challenges facing the province, all ministries, including the Ministry of Community and Social Services, need to ensure that programs are fiscally sustainable. This is necessary to help us protect the services that Ontario families rely on and maintain the improvements we have made in health, education and social services.

That is why we took steps to address funding of discretionary benefits now to help make our social services supports sustainable over the long term while ensuring that the system continues to be there for those who need it.

We must act responsibly with taxpayers’ dollars by setting reasonable limits on rQr’rtrr, hncfitc cnnrf inn nntc tnIndpd tn th nrnvinn rr’lk, th --,-- -

In 2010—11, spending on Ontario Works discretionary benefits increased by about six per cent over the previous year. We are making changes to Ontario Works discretionary benefits to make them more accountable by introducing additional spending controls.

There willcontinue to be a range of needs that can be addressed through discretionary benefits. Ontario Works delivery agents willcontinue to set local policies based on the prioritization of their clients’ needs.

Please be assured that we remain committed to uploading the cost of Ontario Works by 2018 to protect municipalities from uncertainty and volatility in program costs, which will save municipalities $425 million by 2018.

/cont’d

Page 140 of 253 -2-

As you know, on October 24, 2012, the Commission for the Review of Social Assistance in Ontario released its final report. We asked the Commission to find ways to make social assistance simpler, easier to understand, and financially sustainable. The Commission’s report makes 108 recommendations for transforming the social assistance system.

The report makes it clear that there are no simple solutions to successfully transform Ontario’s social assistance programs. That is why this government is going to take the time, working with our partners both inside and outside of government, to discuss the implications of transformation, and begin creating a responsible roadmap for success.

As we undertake this work, please be assured that I will remain mindful of the specific issues you have raised on behalf of municipalities.

In the short term we willlook at changes that willmake a positive difference in the lives of clients, such as: • making improvements to existing social assistance employment services for those who are able to work, to help ODSP clients identifytheir employment goals and access the services and supports they need for success; • determining the best ways to simplify and streamline the system by introducing more modern and effective service delivery for clients; • working with the employer community on how to better connect those receiving social assistance, including people with disabilities, to the workforce; and • continuing to involve and inform municipalities and First Nations as we form the basis for a renewed Poverty Reduction Strategy.

Addressing the system’s complex challenges and gaps willcontinue to require the active involvement of our government and our other service delivery partners and business leaders.

Our government is committed to making progress in the coming months toward achieving the objectives outlined in the Commission’s report. Our goal remains ensunng that the soda ãSSiStãflGC System s tIeIG IOi thUSG Whi iiC iL i 00K ioiWaü to meeting with you, local municipal leaders, and other community representatives to discuss these issues later this month.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Page 141 of 253 -4 Orfla,ic, The The funded delivery Ontario N government known supports,” “We QUOTES Municipalities communities “This ensure supports,” CONTACT Ontario Jeff plans.” 705-742-3777 Matt

Transitional EWS Jeff Peterborough McGuinty McGuinty Ministry Leal’s have Stoeckle one-time as Leal, investment security municipalities of Disability Room the listened said said local Office 251 on of with M.P.P. Government Community will government Main grant Community Jeff Minister how and housing Support need additional Legislative to of Leal. the stability 236 will people $246 in King to of funds 2013-14 and work “This Building

Funding Homeless outline Street Program Community Providing is million and flexibility for who homelessness providing in were West, Queens one-time, Social people combination their as have for Peterborough, Vulnerable while used. Park they Prevention Communities to 2013-14. plans Services and voiced Peterborough Toronto, receiving help transitional work municipalities

for Social ON programs. for individuals ON with their K9J to Ontarians M7A the has Initiative 7L8 assistance implement

Peterborough Services existing 1A4 with concerns additional T: announced funding T: 705-742-3777 Riding 416-325-0534 Transitional develop and (CHPI), housing John from the families with will about funding Thursday F: FOR $42 new their provide 705-742-1822 F: Milloy. a $1,513,219 Ontario 416-325-0570 and 100 access Funding IMMEDIATE million in consolidated CHPI and need.” homelessness per “Our Ontario December Works E: report Page 142 of253 to investment cent to [email protected] E: for goal to [email protected] housing qualifying

Riding support the provincially or back RELEASE is program the 27, Most to to 2012 the the Page 143 of 253 Page 144 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Gary King, CAO

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: 2012 4th Quarter Summary of Projects and Work Priorities

Recommendation: Receive for information.

Financial Impact: Nil.

Background/Analysis:

At the end of each fiscal quarter and once annually at year end, the CAO prepares a status report on project activities, Departmental and Corporate achievements and identifies ongoing projects and issues.

This year, a decision has been made by the undersigned to separate the 2012 4th Quarter report from the Year-end report, with the latter to be circulated to Council at the next scheduled Council Meeting in February.

The projects and priorities that will become the focus of our efforts in the forthcoming year (2013) are typically presented in conjunction with the annual budget.

The 4th quarter is always a very busy time as it is the time of year that many important recurring work requirements either wrap up or commence. Examples include the completion of capital road and bridge construction projects, the development of departmental work plans for the next cycle, completion of Performance Appraisals of all individuals (this process includes establishment of performance objectives tied to the workplans), commencement of budget development, commencement of Winter Roads maintenance activities, etc.

2012 was no different with respect to the aforementioned activities being a large component of the workload in the 4th quarter.

Page 145 of 253 Page 2

Administration

Within Administration, the duties and responsibilities attended to during the 4th Quarter were as follows:

Administration – CAO - Provided support and resource function at various meetings as required and/or scheduled: o Council, Management Team, GPA EDC Board Meetings, EOWC Meetings, EORN Board meetings, Regular and Special Meetings of Joint Services Steering Committee, Emergency Management Program Planning Committee, Corporate Awards Committee. - Attended meetings and assisted in negotiating a 4-year renewal of the GPA EDC Agreement for delivery of economic development and tourism services. - Attended Queen’s University Monieson Business Centre Broadband Conferences as Co-lead of EORN. - Attended several meetings with Otonabee Conservation Authority staff in relation to Grist Mill pedestrian bridge and Hopes Mill property. - Attended several meetings with HR and EMS senior management to deal with labour relations issues. - Attended significant number of meetings with Warden, Director of Finance, Director, Procurement, Facilities & Communications and solicitors to deal with law suit issues. - Attended an Aggregate Issues Meeting with City of Kawartha Lakes. The Warden and Director of Public Works also attended.

The work of the Administration – Clerical Unit and the other Departments over the 4th quarter are listed below.

Administration – Clerical Unit

- As Recording Secretary and/or in a resource capacity, prepared/published Agendas and attended all regular and closed session meetings of: o County Council. o Accessibility Advisory Committee. o Lang Pioneer Village Advisory Committee. o Awards and Bursaries Committee. o Nominating Committee. o Warden’s Committee. o Warden’s Investigative Committee. - Participated in: o Management Team Meetings. o Peterborough County Municipal Managers Clerks & Treasurers meetings. o Team Meetings.

Page 146 of 253 Page 3

o Records Management Meetings. o Land Division Committee Meetings. o Departmental HR matters. o Parliamentary Procedure 2 day Workshop. o AMCTO Freedom of Information Workshop. o AMCTO Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation (Part 1 – Creating Multi-Year Plan & Policies). o UPS training for Clerical staff o TOMRMS Workshop. - Meeting with appropriate staff concerning drafting of by-laws and discussions/emails where appropriate with Townships and/or County solicitor. - Finalized appropriate by-laws, completed all follow-up related to County Council decisions and/or Committee recommendations, updated and streamlined appropriate databases. - Conducted Performance Appraisals. - OGRA/ROMA Hotel Bookings - Provided clerical support and assistance to Land Division Committee Secretary and other departments as required. - Ongoing tasks associated with: o Recognition Awards. o TOMRMS. o Warden’s Election. o Bursary Awards. o Policy Review. o ICompass. - Provided commissioning and affidavit services and handled all counter/telephone inquiries or directed to appropriate department.

Human Resources Department

- Recruitment & Selection o Administration - Recruitment for a new Executive Assistant to the CAO & Warden commenced in December with a projected start date of February 4th 2013. o Planning - Recruitment for GIS Technologist Temp backfill position complete. Sara Chartrand was the successful applicant. Start date Jan 7 2013.

Page 147 of 253 Page 4

o EMS - Temp. FT Shift Superintendent successful applicant is Jeff Wilson who commenced supervisor responsibilities on October 29, 2012 and will end on April 29, 2013. - PT Shift Superintendent Recruitment (2 positions open and 13 applications). Successful applicants were Kayella MacKenzie and Brett Dunn who started on October 22, 2012. - Chris O’Connor is the successful applicant for the Full Time Paramedic position that opened starting on November 26, 2012. o Public Works - Donnie Johnson was the successful applicant for Full Time Labourer position on October 22, 2012 (220 applications total). - Retirements/Resignations - Amanda Dibbits, Administration – resigned on December 31, 2012 - Shah Yousuf, GIS – Resigned on November 2, 2012 - Dave Faragher, EMS – resigned on December 31st, 2012 - Special Projects - Conversion to TOMRMS is complete. We are now in the process of waiting for direction on electronic conversions and the destruction of files past their retention dates. - Learning & Development Portal launched on November 14th and 15th with a Lunch & Learn that took place in the Council Chambers. For paramedics, the presentation was given to them at their CME’s. Presentation to Council took place on December 7, 2012. - All employees that work at the County of Peterborough have now been trained on the AODA Customer Services Standards training with documentation in their individual files. - Payroll & Benefits - 3 Short term and 1 Long term disability claim processed. - Participated in several external surveys for other municipalities. - Overtime released rate for Jacobs Time Management (EMS) is still an outstanding issue, but we are in constant communication with Diamond to find a fix. - Canada Savings Bonds campaign completed with 2 new applicants and 2 changes. - Payroll & Accounting Specialist well versed in all payrolls now and doing a fabulous job. - All employees have been contacted re lost time periods to purchase for OMERS. Many have responded and are purchasing, but others have not responded. Reminders will be sent. - Records of employment have been issued for all seasonal terminations. - E-advice pay slip and Pension Reporting programs have been purchased from Diamond and will be implemented in 2013. Both will streamline payroll processes.

Page 148 of 253 Page 5

- October 1st increases for 1306 and non-union management in place for first pay in October - Prepaid Leave participation for non-union employees approved by Council. - Successful year-end for payroll with no problems. - Payroll schedule for Jan-June/13 prepared to provide back-up and training on all payrolls. - All overtime banks cleared for union & non-union staff, excluding management and LPV (whose banking year is May to April). - United Way campaign deductions set up for first pay in January/13. - Completed all prep work for Jan. 1st increases for 4911 paramedics – to process first pay of 2013. - Updated Council per diem rates re approved increase for Jan. 1/13. - Health & Safety/Wellness - Employee Wellness Event/program was held on November 20th, approximately 46 employees participated. - The PCCHU offered free influenza shots for County employees and immediate family members on Nov. 14th - On November 7th, 2 employees participated in Take your kid to work day. - Labour Relations - Several on-going labour relations issues continued this quarter

Public Works – Administration - Hosted Round 2 Public Information Centres (PICs) for the County Transportation Update in Millbrook, Bridgenorth & Norwood to present initial findings and options and solicit input from the public. Continued work on County Transportation Plan Update, including finalizing Steering Committee and TAC meetings prior to the final round of PICs which were held in Lakefield and Keene. - Developed the Request for Proposal for the Consulting Engineering Services for the Detail Design, Contract Administration and Inspection of Airport Road, awarded the contract, and commenced work on the project (Archaeological Study). - Represented the County at the Peterborough Cycling Summit as a speaker, regarding the County’s position and plans related to cycling. - Planned and hosted the mandatory public meeting for the annual review of the County ATV by-law. - Conducted 2012 divisional workplan review and numerous stages of budget meetings with Public Works Managers. - Continued work as a member of the Human Resources Working Committee. - Attended Emergency Management Program Committee meeting for the annual review and update to the County Hazard and Risk Assessment.

Page 149 of 253 Page 6

- Waste Management Committee at City Hall including presentation of report on commencement of EA to develop long term County/City waste disposal strategy.

Public Works - Environmental Services - Promotion and Education o My Waste App (itouch and android) – revamping with new “searchable” version o Schools Program regional delivery working with PGU – 6 visits completed and website www.recyclerangers.ca launched o Environment Day held in partnership with City at Bensfort Landfill (171 cars total) o Ongoing articles, PSA, etc. written for local news o Holiday advertising – website updates etc. completed - Waste Management Master Plan o Presentations made to all Township Councils in November o PIC held and Public Surveying completed (15 attended PIC and 448 surveys received) o Waste Management SC meeting held on Dec 3 o Draft plan finalized and presentation drafted for January 23rd County Council - MHSW, WEEE, and Organics o New County MHSW site (Smith) –CofA amendment submitted to MOE o Research ongoing on mobile MHSW collection and transport – application pending o MHSW/WEEE sites – operations closed Thanksgiving and final shipments complete – car visits up 12% and tonnage up 9%, WEEE up 129% over 2011 o Depot and Curbside Organics 19% increase YTD November 2011 to 2012 o Backyard Composting pilot “Garbage to Garden” 71 visits completed and report finalized (142% of target) – estimated 9.8 tonnes diverted - Monitoring and Measuring o CIF/SO waste audit program Fall Audits completed Oct 2012 – 4 seasons, 100 households o Recycling – YTD Nov. curbside rates up 1.7%, depot rates down -2.8%, overall up 0.3% o Garbage – YTD Nov. down 9% (PCCWMF) - Administration o Ongoing contract compliance and financial review o Bensfort Landfill – detailed financial review – true-up changes requested from City o 2013 workplan and budget preparation - Staff o Special Project Coordinate contract extended to Dec 21 o All Staff Performance Appraisals – completed in November

Page 150 of 253 Page 7

Public Works - Operations - Staffing o Full time Labourer hire (Oct. 22nd) from July vacancy. o Temporary winter Labourers hired (positions phased-in as required). o Temporary winter position postings (night shift and weekend patrollers) and subsequent internal postings to backfill positions. o Return to work program for employee returning from STD. - Training o Fueling and Fuel Management System training (all staff). o Supervisors attended Loyalist Management course (several modules). o The Weather Network RWIS training for supervisors and patrollers. o Salt/snow management workshop. o Snow plow operator training. - Tenders o Seasonal Loader rental. Awarded. o Vacuum trailer. Awarded. o Plow truck (under 2013 budget) closed. Award recommendation for Jan 9th, 2013. o Pick-up tenders (under 2013 budget)(Short-box, long-boxes and Crew- cab). Awarded. - Plow routes maps upgraded. - Insurance/legal liability claims. - Insurance recovery for damaged truck and brush chipper. - Winter Maintenance Agreements. - 2013 Budget preparation. - Douro Depot roof repairs complete. - Millbrook salt shed roof replacement. - Pilot culvert liner program - liners installed. - Asbestos removal at Millbrook and Havelock Depots. - Surplus equipment auction. - Employee performance appraisals completed. - Winter season preparation (depots, equipment, trucks).

Public Works - Technical Services - Administration o Budget – presentation of preliminary 10 year forecast to Council o Traffic calming – monitoring of installations; donation from St. Martin School Parent Council o Transportation Plan – Steering Committee meetings o Training o OGRA Asset Management o Supervisory Skills for Transportation & Public Works o ASSHTO Highway Safety Manual seminar o Autocad webinar

Page 151 of 253 Page 8

o 2012 traffic counts o Clear Zone study – data collection completed o Bridge inspections – 94 structure inspections completed by County staff o N. Kawartha Parking Bylaw review - Development/Severance Applications o CR 1, CR 4, CR 9, CR 12, CR 20, CR 36 – consent/severance reviews o Municipal consents for utility installations o Various entrance permits - RFP’s Studies o Gifford Causeway . Steering Committee meeting . PIC No. 2 o CR 21 (King St.) – RFP awarded o Lower Buckhorn/Trent Canal Bridges - RFP awarded o Oakdale/Wards/ Bridges - RFP awarded o CR 28/21 – RFP awarded; PIC convened o Airport Road Reconstruction - RFP awarded o CR 29/Concession St signals – RFP awarded; preliminary design commenced - Tenders/Construction o CR 30 – shutdown for winter; completion in 2013 as planned o Hot mix tender – completed (CR 34 cycling lanes deferred to 2013) o Microsurface tender – completed (CR 36 deferred to 2013) o Surface treatment tender – completed o Line painting/pavement marking tender – completed o Crack sealing tender - completed o Keene Bridge rehabilitation – completed o Birdsall Bridge – completed o CR 504 (2011 section) repair –completed o Bensfort Rd – substantial performance issued

EMS - Rebranding of EMS Implemented Locally: o In 2000, our then newly formed association wanted to incorporate the new use of the term EMS (opposed to ambulance services) and the important symbolism of the transition to municipal control. The Association of Municipal Emergency Medical Services of Ontario (AMEMSO) represented this well, and the name was indeed suitable. o The name AMEMSO, while entirely appropriate in 2000 was dated. It needed to change, and the association resolved in 2011 to move forward with that initiative. o The association is the representative association of municipalities and their Chiefs on operational and EMS issues. Internally, AMEMSO was well recognized by stakeholders such as the

Page 152 of 253 Page 9

Emergency Health Services Branch (EHSB) and some quarters of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC), by the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), and by our own members. We needed a name that was truly representative, and current. Once we had ambulance attendant, EMT, EMA, PCP, ACP, CCP, but then we eventually accepted “paramedic”. For the same reason, AMEMSO needed to be rebranded to enhance public recognition of the name and understanding of the role. o Rebranding is extremely important. It is a vector to increase our association’s influence and a way to solidify our presence. To these ends, we have undertaken a new name, developed a new logo, and created a new mission statement with goals because we are evolving, transitioning and positioning the association more strategically. The Ontario Association of Paramedic Chiefs (OAPC) was confirmed as the new name this past May, and received its unveiling at this year’s AGM held at Ottawa in September. o County Council in session on December 19th passed a resolution authorizing the new rebranding initiative to take effect for Peterborough County/City EMS. o As of January 1, 2013 our Service will now be known as Peterborough County/City Paramedics. We have also designed a new logo, and you will begin to notice the new Changes to the identification of vehicles, uniforms, equipment and stationery. I am excited about the new rebranding and name change as our profession now reflects where the core of our services originates…..with our Paramedics!! - Paramedic Promotional Video – “Building Community” o During the past summer and fall months we commissioned a media company to work with our Service to develop a video to be used when providing presentations at the many public awareness and educational events we attend or host annually. The intended theme was not only to showcase our Service but to highlight the involvement our paramedics have within the community away from the workplace. As a result, a 4 minute video was exceptionally well done and does indeed capture our full intend. I know that many of you who recently attended CME had the opportunity to view the video. Feedback received from viewers has been very positive and I would like to thank each of you who agreed to participate in this production and made it a very worthwhile project. - EMS Public Education @ Awareness - 2012 o In 2012, EMS participated and/or hosted over 80 events whereby public education, awareness and training was provided. Target groups such as schools, organizations, groups and the citizens of Peterborough County were able to learn more about EMS and our function within the community. -

Page 153 of 253 Page 10

- Enhanced Communications – Video Message Boards o In December the introduction of video messaging boards were installed at the four ambulance bases and in the ER of PRHC. These message boards will enhance communications regarding operational, administrative and emergency notifications. Notices including severe weather conditions, road/bridge closures, CME and other training dates, policy and procedures, memos and instructional communications to Paramedics can be distributed evenly across our Service and in a very timely manner. The content being viewed is created and monitored by Michelle Walsh at Paramedic HQs.

Procurement, Facilities & Communication

- EORN Broadband Project: o Work on RFP for Fibre to Business Parks o Attendance and reporting to EORN Team and Board meetings o Participation in project team – EORN brainstorming and next steps strategy - County Website/Communications: o Manage the County website – content updates, content review and posting process o Internal website portal project – issues management o Various News Releases o Communication Strategy – Red Brick Communications o County lead on communications in relation to PRHC issue. - Lang Pioneer Village o Meetings re: ORCA Walkway Design o Completed Lang Workshop and IPM Legacy building preliminary drawings - County Forest o Submitted project plan for Student Credit in ecosystems management to Sir Sandford Fleming College. - Insurance/Risk Management o Claims management – dealt with under deductible claims o Various insurance case information dissemination - Corporate Facilities Management o Corporate “facilities” email for issue and request tracking o EMS Lakefield – drainage issues o EMS Digital Communication System - Sustainable Peterborough o Committee member – County representative o Energy Team leader – developed Energy Management Plan Template for all energy team entities to utilize o Climate Change Working Group – member – attended multiple meetings – developed Terms of Reference and applied for two funding streams – Trent University and PCCHU as leads

Page 154 of 253 Page 11

o Economic Development Working Group – member – assisted to develop Greening Business breakfast session to be held January 17th, 2013 - Strategic Planning o Completed annual review of County Strategic Plan Goals and Objectives utilizing Balanced Scorecard approach - Other o Health & Safety Committee member and meetings for Court House and EMS o Contract/agreement reviews for corporation o Township of North Kawartha – meeting and recommendation to Township o Continued work on TOMRMS file management - Purchasing o Continued work with Townships on cooperative opportunities o Continued work with KCPG - Quotations: o Nothing to report - Proposals: o P-14-2012 Rehabilitation of the Lower Buckhorn Bridge and Trent Canal Bridge o P-15-2012 Rehabilitation of the Ward’s Bridge, Crowe River Bridge and the Replacement of the Oakdale Bridge o P-16-2012 Detailed Design and Contract Administration Services for the Construction of Airport Road (CR 11) - Tenders: o T-11-2012 Depot Organics Collection o T-12-2012 Sale of Rear Load Bins o T-13-2012 Demolition & Removal of the Westwood Sand Dome o T-14-2012 Loading, Transportation & Recycling Disposal for Municipal Hazardous or Special Waste (MHSW) o T-15-2012 Supply & Delivery of Emergency Medical Services Uniforms o T-16-2012 Reconstruction of County Road 30 o T-17-2012 Supply & Delivery of One (1) Trailer Mounted Hydro-Vac o T-18-2012 Supply & Delivery of One (1) Seasonal Loader Rental o T-19-2012 Supply & Delivery of One (1) Plow Truck o T-20-2012 Supply & Delivery of One (1) ¾ Ton Crew Cab Pick-Up Truck o T-21-2012 Supply & Delivery of Three (3) New Half Ton Extended Cab Long Box Pick-Up Trucks o T-22-2012 Supply & Delivery of One (1) New Half Ton Extended Cab Short Box Pick-Up Truck

Page 155 of 253 Page 12

Planning

- Ongoing involvement with the following: Source Water Protection, Agricultural Action Committee, Natural Heritage Study, Havelock-Belmont- Methuen OP Update, Cavan-Monaghan OP Update, International Trails Day Committee, Seniors Planning Table, Trans Canada Trails Local Initiatives Committee, Apsley Adult Lifestyle Committee, County Transportation Plan Steering Committee, Gifford Causeway Steering Committee, Waste Management Steering Committee, Housing and Homelessness Committee. - Receipt, processing and approval of numerous OPA and Subdivision Applications; requests for preliminary consultations and meetings with consultants, Township Staff and Township Councils. - On-going involvement with Airport Road closure project and other legal matters. - Participation in review/update of Population Projections (Schedule3) for Provincial Growth Plan (Places to Grow) - Receipt and initial review of draft Provincial Policy Statement - Attend Canadian Institute of Planners conference. - Meeting with MMAH ADM Liz Harding. - Lecture given to 3rd year Trent University Geography class. - Review and report on proposed Provincial Policy Statement. - Attend proposed Growth Plan Amendment information session - Preliminary 2013 Budget discussion with Finance Department - Department staff performance evaluations completed - Continued attendance at Loyalist College Management Training sessions - Total of 186 preliminary reviews completed or underway to the end of 2012 for land owners regarding proposals for lot severances (compared to 193 for same timeframe in 2011)

Planning - Land Division Office

- Total number of applications received to end of 2012 is 131 (compared to total of 124 for 2011) - Decisions made by Planning Director: 102 - Decisions made by Land Division Committee: 12 - Land Division Committee Meetings held October 25 and November 29.

Planning - GIS Section

- County GIS data migrated from MS Access to SQL Server at end of October - Implemented encrypted USB use for secure property data sharing with Townships - OSM annexation property data processed for general & dispatch purposes - Training opportunities included:

Page 156 of 253 Page 13

o In-house SQL Server Integration Services course o Eastern Ontario GIS User Group meeting o Open Data conference (Tammy) o Broadband & Economic Development conference (Matt) o County GIS presentation made to Trent & Fleming students o County Web-GIS training provided to Township of Cavan Monaghan; Peterborough & Kawarthas Area Realtors - EORN contract staff replaced by Matt in acting role for duration (Mar 31/14); temporary County role to be filled from Jan 2013 – Mar 2014 - Still awaiting refresh of the MNR’s information warehouse due back in Q1 2013 (offline since spring 2012) - Map produced for the North Kawartha Historical Society. - Regular parcel, road network, Official Plan & Zoning updates

Respectfully submitted,

Gary King, CAO.

Page 157 of 253 Page 158 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Gary King, CAO

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: EOWC and EORN Activities Report and status update

Recommendation: To be received for information

Background/Analysis:

In January of each year, the Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus holds its annual general meeting. The meeting is held over a two day period and affords an opportunity for both outgoing and incoming Wardens and Mayors (following elections typically held in the member municipalities each December) to discuss and establish project and research priorities for the coming year, as well as to receive updates on projects and/or research that are either complete or on-going.

Recognizing the increasing complexity of the municipal environment vis a vis service delivery and the fiscal, legislative and regulatory relationships between municipalities and the senior levels of government, the task of establishing a limited number of project and research priorities to focus upon each year is becoming a significant challenge. One has only to view the broad range of service delivery responsibilities and recognize that each has its own set of issues, pressures and impacts as well as different and ever-changing rules and regulations, to appreciate the challenge of establishing priorities for an organization that tries to represent the interests of a broad region.

The first day of the two day session is used primarily for review and discussion of many issues and to narrow the focus. In addition, staff present updates on projects that are on-going. During the second day of the annual general meeting (AGM), the Wardens Caucus elects a new Chair and Vice Chair for the forthcoming year and then proceed to formally present their annual Priorities and project status updates to an invited audience of MPPs, MPs, Mayors Caucus representatives, and senior provincial staff.

Page 159 of 253 Page 2

In addition to the foregoing, the EOWC make plans for and decide upon the briefing notes that need to be prepared, and the Ministers to request meetings with at the upcoming OGRA/ROMA Conference.

For 2013, the EOWC elected Warden Rick Phillips of Hastings County as the Chair, and Warden Ron Holman of the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville was elected as Vice Chair.

For purposes of the upcoming OGRA/ROMA Conference, the EOWC has a broad slate of issues for which briefing notes are being prepared, and meetings are being requested with the following Ministries;

Ministry Issue

Infrastructure/MMAH - Roads & Bridge funding - Social Housing

Finance - OMPF formula and reconciliation for 2011 and 2012

OMAFRA - Farm Tax

Ministry of Environment - Waste Management

Community and Social Services - Discretionary Benefits

In relation to the established Priorities for 2013 (see attached), the EOWC has narrowed the focus to two primary issues recognizing that both will have a significant number of component parts – 1) Economic Development Strategy and 2) Financial Sustainability Report updates. This second priority involves research work and updates for the purpose of advocacy with both senior levels of government.

The 2012 Financial Sustainability Report focused upon Asset Management and Roads and Bridge Infrastructure.

The 2013 Financial Sustainability Report (Phase 2) has focused upon sewer, water, waste management and social housing (see highlights attached).

The EOWC were also presented with the most recent EORN Regional Broadband project update – January 2013. For governance purposes, the EOWC has 5 of 9 representatives on the EORN Board of Directors and Warden Bob Sweet of was appointed to the EORN Board to fill a vacancy.

Page 160 of 253 Page 3

The EORN staff team also presented a Draft Strategic Direction document for EOWC consideration and approval. The plan is focused on taking the organization beyond the physical building of the network and focuses on marketing and leveraging to realize regional benefits.

A copy of both the January 2013 EORN update and the EORN business direction (PowerPoint) are attached to this report for your review and information.

Respectfully submitted,

Gary King

Encl: - EOWC 2013 Priorities - Financial Sustainability Update Project – Phase 2 - EORN Project Update – January 2013 - EORN Strategic Direction (PowerPoint)

Page 161 of 253 Page 162 of 253 E9Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus 2013 Priorities

Page 163 of 253 • Priority

EOWC Eastern Economic Ontario e.g. ‘Vardens Caucus #1 Algonquin skills business EORN Development

2013 development retention land

Priorities claim Strategy Page 164 of253 2 2013 Priorities

Priority #2

Financial Sustainability Research/Advocacy e.g. social housing waste management asset management roads and bridges fund

EOWC 3 Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus

Page 165 of 253 • • • •

•

• •

EOWC Eastern

joint/several

Algonquin

farmland

Trent

political

emergency

Marmora Ontario Wardens

Severn CaUCUS

parties

and

Pump

Issue

land

detour

“Parking

/

liability

managed

Rideau

claim/Crown

vision

Storage

routes

Monitoring

for Canal

forest

project

eastern

Lot”

lands

tax

Ontario

program Page 166 of253 4 “Parking Lot” Issue Monitoring

• railway crossings • emergency medical services • seniors health • local distribution companies (electrical) • airports • improved cellular coverage • nuclear industry • international crossings EOWC EasternOntario Wardens’Caucus

Page 167 of 253 “Parking Lot” Issue Monitoring

• other issuesastheyarise

EOWC 6 EasternOntaHoWardens Caucus

Page 168 of 253 FnancaI Sustainability Update Project — Phase 2

Presentation to Eastern Ontario Wardens Caucus ianuary 11, 2013

EOWC Eastern Ontarto Warders’ Caucus

Page 169 of 253 Background to this Update

• 2011-2012: Eastern Ontario Financial Sustainability Update

— 42 variables

— Estimate of overall infrastructure deficit and roads & structures deficit

— Identified need to increase infrastructure investment to maintain assets • EOWCSteering Committee determined a multi-year plan for maintaining key data and extending our understanding of financial sustainability of the region’s local governments

— 38 variables to be updated; 15 variables in 2012; 20 in 2013 and 3 later (census cycle)

— Detailed examination of social housing and environmental services

• “Mining” existing data (FIRs,MOE landfill data, Waste Diversion Ontario)

• Working with EOWCtreasurers and other staff with specialized knowledge

Page 170 of 253 Highlights of 2011 Changes

• Population, households rising slightly in Rural Eastern Ontario • Rural Eastern Ontario has held the line on total operating expenditures (up 0.3%); Total: $1.797 billion • Operating Expenditures have increased in some areas (protection services, environmental services) and declined in other areas (social and family services, transportation services). • Capital Expenditures on Transportation Services declined by $192 million in 2011. • Percentage of assessment that is non-residential declined in 2/3s of Rural Eastern Ontario municipalities • Most municipalities continue to have difficulty maintaining the value of their assets (insufficient capital investment) • Very little change in unemployment in Rural Eastern Ontario; rates continue to be higher than some comparator regions in Ontario

Page 171 of 253 800,000 700,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 200,000 300,000 100000 • • • • Population 0 estimates 60 Overall, Rural cities 356,063 MPAC: -

- 2C002001 -—Rura local Eastern in 370,356 2032 the Esstern governments rural (6.9%) by (706,916); 2003

Population Sub-Region region Ontario • region Ontario 2004 households 2005 but 2006 —A—Separated continues up filed Population 2007 more (2000-2011) 13.5% -- 20C8 different in 2009 slowly Cities Rural to (census) 2013 - grow 2011 2011 than

and Eastern population at or 400,000 350,000 census: 300000 200,000 250,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 City Households a 11.2% modest Ontario; 0 —B—Rural of

Households 2000 ______B- numbers Ottawa 721,475; (FIR) 2001 U Eastern pace, in up 2002 U since Eastern 11.2% 2003 — Ontario than a higher (2000-2011) bit 2004 2000 Ontario appear faster since 2005 than Page 172 of253 2006 —i—Separated 2000; than - FIR/MPAC 2007 in .=1 By the 2008 Sub-Region the census: census 2009 Cities separated 2010 2011 Population Aged 65 and Older

Total Percentage Age By Sub-Region (2011Census) # Age 65-74 # Age 75-84 # Age 85÷ 65 and over Population 65 and over Rural Lastern Ontario l4,54lJ 41,14U 1(,(45 14t,4 (J[,5bb 019 Separated Cities 36330 26330 11,85 74,515 395627 0 19 Ditvof Ottawa 62.6Th 37.5813 16.335 116.590 833.391 0.13 AllEastern Ontario 183,545 111,050 45,935 340,530 2,016,583 016 ONTARIO 1,004,265 627,660 246,400 1,878,325 12,851,820 015

Municipality Percentage • Aging phenomenon continues Source: 2011 Census 65 and over in Rural Eastern Ontario (and in Frontenac 11.4 Haliburton 27.3 separated cities) Hastings Highlands 19.2 Lanark 18.3 • 19% of population is 65+ (2011) Leeds and Grerville 1&1 Lennox and Addington 18.1 • 17% of population in 2006 Northumberland 21.3 Peterborough 14.4 • Ontario’s 65+ age group has Prescott and Russell 14.2 Prince Edward 18.2 increased from 14 to 15% in Renfrew 173 Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry 171 same period ;Kawartha Lakes 21.9 • On county-by-county basis, varies from 14.2% to 27.9%

Page 173 of 253 Total $70.2 in reporting Assessment billion.

Total $120,000,000,000 $100,000,000,000 Sao,ooo,ooo,ooo $40,000,000,000 $20,000,000,000 (FIR). This $0 in apparent

Assessment 2002 Rural 2003 Eastern —i—Rural phenomenon 2004 Total Ontario Ontario 2005 Assessment 2006 should has (2002-2011) —a—Separated - declined — 2007 All be Types

By treated 2008 Cities - by By

Sub-Region Sub-Region 2009 3% with in 2010 the caution 06 City 2009-2011 Page 174 of253 2011 of 079.465 $70,213,524,740 Ottawa 55.200,752,351 due 767024 to period changes to ______9______zzz;______------

Reliance on Residential Assessment Grows Stronger in Rural Eastern Ontario Change in Percentage of Non-Residential Tax Base 2010-2011 Municipalities # Declining # Same # Increasing % Declining % Same % Increasing Rural Ontario 68 12 22 66 12 21 Separated Cities 1 0 10 10 0 100 City of Ottawa 1 0 0 100 0 0 Total 70 12 32 100 100 100

• 66% of all municipalities in Rural Eastern Ontario saw declines in percentage of non-residential tax base (68/103)

• 21% of Rural Eastern Ontario municipalities saw increases in percentage of non-residential tax base (22/103)

• 12% of REO municipalities did not experience any change (12/103) Percentage of Assessment that is Non-Residential (2002-2011) ----—------.------F I 217 ______1

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 -4—RuralEastern Ontario —:Separated Cities City of Ottawa

Page 175 of 253 Total the

Total $200,638 assessment $350,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 Taxable $- per

Assessment —rn--Rural 2002 per household household Assessment 2003 Ontario in 2004 separated is $189,584 2005 Per (2002-2011) —*—Separated cities. 2006 Household in Rural

Per 2007 Cities Eastern 2008

Household - By Ontario, 2009 —.—City Sub-Region Page 176 of253 2010 of slightly Ottawa 2011 285906 less than Change in Total Operating Expenditures

Total Operating Expenditures by Local Governments in Eastern Ontario - By Sub-Region (2000-2011) $2.840 billion (3% increase) $3,000000,000 -

$2500000000 ------

$2000000000 $1.797 billion;(.3%increase)

$1500000000 .————--—

S1,00oMooo00 - — . $1.103 billion; (2% increase)

$500,000,000 .—-— —..-——— ..-

$ 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2000 2007 2008 2000 2010 2011

——Rural Eastern Ontario —*—Separated Cities —S—Cityof Ottawa

Across the region as a whole, total operating expenditures were $4.7 billion in 2011; up 2% from 2010.

Page 177 of 253 Change in Operating and Capital Expenditures — Transportation Services

Total Operating and Capital Expenditures on Transportation Services (2000-2011) (FIR400699 11 and -52 0699 07)

$1,400,000,000 $1.01 billion (20% decrease)

$1,200,000,000

$1,000,000.000

$800,000,000 $556 million (11% decrease) $600,000,000

$400,000,000

$200,000,000 $296 million (18% increase)

$—I - -- - V T I 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

——RiiralEastern Ontario —*--SeparatedCities Cityof Ottawa

Operating budgètslncré b$7i[ITóh arid capital budgets d&lFñ&dhirp[y ($E million) for Rural Eastern Ontario; both operating and capital budgets declined in Ottawa. Operating and capital budgets increased in the separated cities.

Page 178 of 253 Change in Operating Expenditures — Protection Services (2000-2011)

Total Operating Expenditures on Protection Services (2000-2011) (FIR4004997)

$600,000,000 0: $487 million Ssoo,000,000 (16%increase) $400,000,000 REO:$235 million $300,000,000 (12%increase) $200,000,000 sc:$216 million Sioo,ooo,000 (12%increase) $ 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

—— Rural Eastern Ontario Sepa rated Cities Cityof Ottawa

• Total expenditures across region: $939 million

• Includes fire, police, court security, prisoner transportation, conservation authority, protective inspection and control, building permit & inspection, emergency measures, POA

Page 179 of 253 Change in Operating Expenditures: Social and Family Services (2000-2011)

Operating Expenditures on Social and Family Services - By Sub-Region (2000-2011) Source: FIRSIC 40 1299 07 $500,000,000 $450,000,000 $392 million (.1% decrease) $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $345 million (17% decrease) $250,000,000 5200,000,000 $150,000,000 $194 million (9.5% decrease)

$50,000,000 ----

— $0 —.—-——— 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

—÷—RuralEastern Ontario —c—SeparatedCities - City of Ottawa

Total expenditures in the region: $93TmiIIion (2011),down 8.9% from 2010 Includes general assistance, assistance to aged persons, and child care

Page 180 of 253 ______

Change in Operating Expenditures: Health and Emergency Services (2000-2011)

Total Operating Expenditures for Health and Emergency Services (2000-2011) FIRSLC4O 1099 11 0: $146 million (30% increase) $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 REO: million (1% increase) $80,000,000 $136 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 REO:$58 million (4% increase)

$ 1 T 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

——RurI 6at-’rt, Ontario ——Sopr3tc1 Citio •-*- CityfOttw

• Total expenditures across region: $341.7 million (2011) • Includes public health services, hospitals, ambulance services, ambulance dispatch, cemeteries

Page 181 of 253 ______

Post-Recession Unemployment Rate in Rural Eastern Ontario Typically ‘‘2% Above Urban Centres “Eastern Ontario” 8.8% includes Frontenac, Lanark, 10 Leeds and Grenville, Prescott and Russell, Renfrew and 9 J Dundas and Stormont, Glengarry Counties. 8 Ontario: 7.5% 7 “” I— 6 - - 8.6% includes -‘ Bruce, Grey, Simcoe, 5 Muskoka, Victoria Kawartha Ottawa Lakes, part of 4 6% Durham, Haliburton, Peterborough, Hastings, 3 Prince Edward, L&A 2

1

0

•1

-4—Kingston-Pembroke —L-Ottawa —*—EasternOntario —.€—CentralOntario

Source: Labour Market Bulletins — HRSDC,Government of Canada

Page 182 of 253 Source:

‘ :_. .2 0 LLI E 0. E 6,750 6,850 6,800 6,600 6,650 6,700 6,400 6550 6,250 6,350 6,500 6,300 6,450 Labour 3Q2006 - - Market 3Q2007 I IIIIiIiIIIiiiI Employment Bulletin iz

Employment — 3Q2008 Ontario, Employment J I and

FhilI Ontario 11IIIIIiIilLiIII1I Fall 3Q2009 Unemployment 2012 —Unemployment 3Q2010 Rate rate 3Q2011 liii Page 183 of253

I 3Q2012 8.0 4.0 9.0 10.0 6.0 7.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 1.0

I Toronto Economic Ottawa Kingston-Pembroke Hamilton-Niagara Kitchener-Waterloo-Barrie Muskoka-Kai1iarthas Region Windsor-Sarnia London Ontario Stratford-Bruce North’est Northeast at 8.3%. From Ottawa 7.9% 01 In region and the Regions 2011 Peninsula Muskoka-Kawartha’s same Peninsula to rate 03 period, increased 2012, 1st 2011

Employment 10.6 the Q 77 6 3.7 9.8 8.2 7.3 T9 8.2 8.1 8.3 8.4 Ontario’s 6 from 2nd Kingston-Pembroke 2011 7.8 7.9 6 7.1 8.7 5.0 8.9 71 61 8.6 8.8 8.7 rate Q 3 6.6 Unemployment unemployment 3rd dropped 2011 to Q 6.9%. 1.3 4.7 6 7.1 8.6 1.3 1.6 8.9 9.1 1.4 6.5 8.4 3 1st 2012 by Rates 0 16.7 region 3.8% 4.6 71, 6.6 6 7.4 1.3 6.9 8.4 81 6.6 81 1 rate 2nd 2012 (10.6 rate T8 7.4 9.0 6 went 6.6 7.5 6.9 7.9 8.1 6.2 3.9 8.6 0 1 Page 184 of253 to 3rd was 2012 up 6.8%). Q 6.8 7.9 6 L6 6.9 9.4 L5 7.0 5.0 8.2 8.3 from unchanged 9j - QI 032012 The - 7.7 2011 to to -0.5 -1.4 -1.5 -2.3 -0.1 -2.8 0 0 01 3 0 6 1 Maintaining Municipal Assets: Net Book Value of Capital Assets Per Household

at Eastern Ontario 4.5,424L1 Separated Cities ]114,20& 3,069,463,753 058 City ofOttawa 542 10,350,390,740 074

• On average, municipalities in Rural Eastern Ontario have been able to preserve about 56% of the value of capital assets. Roughly $3.8 billion in value has been lost.

• Municipalities in Rural Eastern Ontario continued to lose ground in 2011, down about 1% from the previous year. • On a per-household basis, municipalities in Eastern Ontario hold roughly $13,400 to $14,000 in assets for each household in the jurisdiction. This is about $3,000-$4,000 less per household than in the separated cities and about half of the asset value per household held by the City of Ottawa.

Page 185 of 253 Preserving Asset Value: Net Book Value of Capital Assets as Percentage of Capital Cost

Net Book Value as Percentage of Capital Costs • Very little change (%of Municipalities in Each Category 2011) Source9RPM 91 991416 over 2010-2011 in municipalities’ ability to maintain value of capital assets • A few municipalities have seen further deterioration; a few have been able to make net investments

I Municipalit,es 50% or less N3VJCCA I Vunicipsli:es Between 50 and 75% N8V/CCA • Q: What will happen

I Murlicipdlilies Buiweeri 75 arid 100% NBV/CCA in an era with limited reinvestment opportunities?

Page 186 of 253 Social Housing Highlights:

• Est. 5,400 units in Rural Eastern Ontario (n/i rent supplements or NFPhousing not owned by municipality; excludes units in separated cities) • Waiting lists are close to 9,000 households in Rural Eastern Ontario plus separated cities (6% of provincial total) • REO:No sign of interest in adding more units; recent emphasis has been on improvements to existing units (e.g. energy efficiency upgrades)

Page 187 of 253 Waiting Lists for Social Housing in Ontario

Number of Households on Municipal Waiting Lists 2004-2011 160,000 5 ,358 012)

141,635 140,000

126,103 124,785 129,2

120,000 121,726

100,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Source: Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association, May 2011

Page 188 of 253 Social housing waiting lists in Ontario’s 47 service manager regions 156,358 active households on waiting lists Prescott and R”’” 1,055 Ottawa Southern Ontario 10,097 IndudingToronto,Central, Southern. \ Southwestern, and Eastern Ontario Hastings Cornwall Kawartha Lakes 860

Grey Co:y ruce enno:

Northumberland Duffer ,,..— 4 Peterborough 285 T’k—. )—\ ) 1,697 Wellington York 1,320 ‘ 8 683 Toronto Peel 69,342 ApproxImate watttime Stratford ranges for families 300 12,853 Halton 3 Lessthan 1 year Huron Niagara 342 LI ito 2 years London mthon 2 to 3 years 3,090 LI3 to 5 years Bran Lambton 5toi0years 3280 899 537 LIYears unreported Oxford Norfolk 670 271 Thesecobuis represent a rangeofpstential St. Thomas it times. Farmatepeci& aeit 123 Survey conducted In 2012 by timeinformation,see the accompanyngtable Chatham-Kent the Ontario Non-Profit Housing 371 Association (CNPHA).Statistics are Windsor current as of D&eniber 31, 2011. 2,019

Page 189 of 253 Service Manager Number on Waiting List Waiting Lists for (at end of 2011) Social Housing in Cornwall 860 Hastings 1,359 Eastern Ontario Kawartha Lakes 531 Kingston 1,156 • Rural Eastern Ontario plus the Lanark 237 Separated Cities account for Leeds 527 6% of the provincial waiting Lennox 304 list. Northumberland 285 Peterborough 1,697 • Ottawa’s waiting list is higher

Prescott & Russell 1,055 than all of the rest of Eastern Renfrew 877 Ontario, representing 6.5% of provincial waiting list. REO+ Sep Cities 8,888 the Ottawa 10,097 Source: Ontario Non-Profit HousingAssociation, May 2012

Page 190 of 253 •

separated

Est. — —

$375-$430

Does

social

Social

not

housing

cities:

include

million

Housing

infrastructure

any

provision

Highlights:

for

deficit

additional Page 191 of253

for

REQ

units + 2 Ways to Calculate S/H Deficit

• A. “Accounting Records”: Initial cost of social housing units was $943 million. On “book” basis, units have lost 40% of value); deficit = $375 million.

NetBook NetBook NetBook Net Value Value Value Gain/Loss in (Start 2009) (End 2010) (End 2011) Value (2009- Social Housing: ($million) ($rnillion) ($million) 2011) Eastern Ontario $ 553.8 $ 555.9 $ 552.9 -$ 0.90 Rural Eastern Ontario and Separated Cities $ 236.2 $ 247.3 $ 258.0 $ 21.80 City of Ottawa 317.6 $ 308.6 $ 294.9 -$ 22.70 • B. “On the Ground”: — Significantvariability in financial approaches municipalities take in social housing (e.g. to valuations, replacement costs, R&M,capitalization)

— Based on capital needs studies at single/upper tier level, social housing infrastructure deficit for REQ+ separated cities is: $400- $430 million

Page 192 of 253 Environmental Services

• Annual Operating Expenditures

— By Major Category • Solid waste • Waste Diversion

Page 193 of 253 ______

Annual Operating Expenditures — Environmental Services Total Operating Expenditures on 0: $280M Environmental Services (2000-2011) REO:$230M (FIR40 0899 7) SC: $163M $300,000,000

5250,000,000

5200,000,000

5150,000,000

Increased op expenditures in Sioo,ooo,ooo Rural Eastern Ontario 550,000,000 2000-2011: 203% Separated Cities: 136%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

——Rural Eastern Ontario —*—Separated Cities City of Ottawa

Page 194 of 253 Separated Rural Ottawa Expenditures Counties, responsibility. services Environmental municipality In Environmental Total lower most Eastern environmental tier are Cities EO env. Annual a Ontaño . 2011 ‘total F-Iastin9s i1Iibut1uti Lanark op. Frontenac Lennox Leeds Prince Prescott Peterborough Northurrtherland Stormont, Kawartha Renfrew Expendthires Environmental exp. Total arid and Edward 22967C,43 132326,919 and i35,36,12 Water — and Lakes Dundas County Operating Grenville Eastern Waste Addington Water Russeli County - 2011 and Services Ontario _____ Total-Water Total 2S,96Q229 23,322,292 6,18,&26 and 135,365,125; Waste Water 24,391,450 15,775,024 17,676,660 19,638474: in 12,825,922 7,241,046 2,3O,607 ,171,953 6,192,338 7,816,711 9,672,541 6,345,297. Waste 2011: 587:02 Solid $693.2 Total 68,138.626 Expenditures 13,331,245 4,944,002 4,214,784 4,750,082 4,058,554 2,002,685 3,513,787; 2,371243 5,459,797 6,243,426 7,075,644 8,268,569 1,904,808 Waste Diversion (major 26,441438 39,164,630 million; 12,696,54 Solid Total S S S S 5 S S S $ S S S S $ Rural Diversion 26,441,438 Total 4,873,719 2,263782 2,957,316 2,585,090 2,873,502 3,270.347 1,126,253 1,206168 1,075,209 1,570,609 772,864 941,244 925,335 Eastern Total $ $ $ categories) 1,593,389 1,576,823 Page 195 of253 Total $ 5 5 $ $ S S 5 5 Ontario S S 5 $ S Other 1,593,389 304,265 194,366 870,272 42,065 44,155 67,203 58,805 Other 3,940 8,318 - is — 33% - - - - 294,7g5,2G 231 166,922,98 Total Types 231,538,571 Total of 35,843,221 26,302,906 30,085,848 19,469,566 32,213,803 12,831,195 12,656,498 12,121,739 14,599,542 15,204,913 ,538,578 Types 4,223,318 6,712,712 9,273,317 total. All All Annual Operating Expenditures — Environmental Services

Environmental Expenditures by Major Category (%)- Rural Eastern Ontario (2011) 0.7

I Water & W/Water I Other

Rural Eastern Ontario spends 58.5% of its environmental services budgets on waste water, storm sewer, water treatment and distribution services.

Page 196 of 253 Annual Operating Expenditures — Environmental Services (by category)

Environmental Expenditures by Type ($)- Rural Eastern Ontario (2011) Source: HR 4006110699 11 1,593,3$9 2,9i0,631 $2,607,756 $26441438\ $17948365

‘Vastewater collection! conveyance

• Wastewater treatment &disposal

Uiban sewer system —I/ • stoim • Ruralstomm sewer system • Water treatment • Water distribution! transniisslon I Solidwaste collection Solid waste disposal $20,610,462 • Waste diversion

Other — Environment

Compared to the separated cities (taken as a group), Rural Eastern Ontario spends: twice as much on total solid waste collection costs. •nearly five times as much on solid waste disposal. more than twice as much on waste diversion.

Page 197 of 253 Highlights of Asset Analysis

• Environmental Services: • “Town/Hamlet” municipalities in REDtend to have higher levels of reserves for water-related assets and lower liabilities for solid waste • “Rural” municipalities in REDtend to have few reserves but substantially higher liabilities for solid waste • 90% of Eastern Ontario’s landfills are in Rural Eastern Ontario; 34% of them are open --- concentrated in rural areas • Legacy costs are a major concern (closure costs, ongoing monitoring, changing regulatory environment, expansions/new sites) • Total liabilities for solid waste disposal in Rural Eastern Ontario may be in the range of $100M.

Page 198 of 253 90% of Region’s Landfills are in Rural Areas...58% of these Landfills are Closed/Not in Use as Landfill Sub-Region Totai Municipal Private Other Open Closed Rural Eastern Ontario 426 49 13 C181282 Sep2rated Cities 37 17 15

City f Offawa I 17 13 4 0 8 9 Total 542 456 68 1 203 314

Summary by Upper/Single Community Tier Municipality Belleville Cornwall Kingston Peterborough Ottawa Total landfills - All Types It St U U It

Frontenac o 0 35 a a 35 Haliburton o a a 51 a 51 Hastings 61 0 1 a a 62 Kawartha lakes o a a 18 a is Lanark o a a a 29 29 Leeds and Grenville o 0 35 a a 35 Lennox and Addington o a 28 a a 28 Northumberland o 0 0 36 0 36 Peterborough o a a 57 a Prince Edward 11 0 0 a a ii Prescott & Russell 29 0 0 a a 29 Renfrew o a a a 53 63 Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry o 34 0 a a

Total - Rural Eastern Ontario Wi 34 99 162 92 488

Page 199 of 253 The Eastern regional REQ Waste diversion All Separated Rural Lanark Hastings Haliburton Frontenac City By is Northumberland Lennox Leeds Stormont, Renfrew Prince Prescott Peterborough Kawartha Eastern Upper!Single also of Eastern Ontario and Ottawa Edward population). and and Lakes Dundas County Cities Grenville Ontario Addington diverting Russell Ontario Diversion County rate Tier and than Glengarry (via 29% in , ‘ ‘ r Blue the of Box) urban the Lower 11,343 18,853’ 4,414 6,535 5,551’ 3,458’ 3,289 7,475 2.750 1.665 6,966 8,260 1,787 regional is areas r significantly (29%). in total 20,680 22,594 26,471 22,484 26,601 52.423 12,394 11,105 56,792 10,272 10,564 5,594 8,829 Rural (REQ lower Page 200 of253 has 12 in Areas 36% 45 38 35 Rural 20 26 34 32 32 32 33 31 36 33 20 15 31

) of the Cost/Tonne for Waste Diversion Much Higher in Rural Eastern Ontario

• Gross cost per tonne for diversion via Blue Box rises as size of community declines and as geographic dispersion increases • Gross revenue per tonne for marketed material declines for smaller communities • Net cost per tonne for diversion via Blue Box rises as size of population and associated material volumes decline and as geographic dispersion increases • Net cost data (2011) from Waste Diversion Ontario, categorized by WDO program:

— Urban regional (6 communities): $155/tonne

— Medium urban (7): $180/tonne

— Small urban (23): $211/tonne

— Rural regional (14): $259/tonne

— Rural collection — south (65): $361/tonne

— Rural depot — south (33): $432/tonne • Rural Eastern Ontario’s costs compare favourably for curbside collection but are challenging for depots. In part, this is due to better revenues in curbside programs.... But gross costs/tonne are above $400/tonne for both groups.

Page 201 of 253 Gross Costs Per Gross Revenue Per Net Cost Per Blue Box Tonne Marketed Tonne Marketed Tonne Marketed Tonnes TotaL Gross (Weighted Total Gross (Weighted Total Net (Weighted Program Name Marketed Costs Average) Revenue Average) Cost Average)

Urban Regional Ottawa 62,961 $18,269,251 $ 290 $ 11,367,909 $ 181 $ 5,901,342 $ 110 SOntarioCommunities 170,910 $53,171,505 $ 311 $ 26,663,459 $ 155 $26,508,047 $ 155 Premium/Efficiency $ 21 $ (25) $ 45

Medium Urban Peterborough (City) 9,037 $ 2,228,185 $ 247 $ 1,459,25] $ 151 $ 758,928 $ 85 7 Ontario Communitie5 51,202 $14,149,565 $ 276 $ 4,922,419 $ 95 $ 9,227,245 S 180 Premium/Efficiency S 29 S 155) S 95

Small Urban 6 Rural EO Communities 2,590 $ 936,619 S 352 $ 223,723 5 85 5 712,895 $ 275 23 Ontario Communities 23,392 $ 5,210,971 S 265 $ 1,282,680 5 55 5 4,928,290 $ 211 (96) S 31) S (64) Premium/Efficiency S ( I Rural Regional 3 Rural EO Communities 16,043 $ 7,878,477 $ 491 $ 2,224,508 S 139 5 5,553,969 ; 352 14 Ontario Communities 98,537 539.306.169 S 399 S 13.825.752 S 140 525.480.417 259 Premium/Efficiency __ S 192) S 1 H (93) Rural Collection - South 30 Rural EO Communities 21,903 $ 9,005,482 5 411 $ 1,862,657 5 85 $ 7,142,825 5 325 65 Ontario Communities 38,937 S16,587,931 S 426 S 2.539.364 S 55 514.042.567 S 361 Premium/Efficiency $ 15 S (20) S 35 Rural Depot - South 25 EO Communities 9,225 $ 4,181,171 $ 453 $ 74,425 $ B $ 4,106,745 $ 445 33OntrioCommunities 10,001 5 4,424,230 $ 440 $ 74,002 5 7 $ 4,349,028 $ 432 Premium/Efficiency S (13) $ (1) $ (13)

Page 202 of 253 Observations on Environmental Services

• Waste management plans becoming more common across Rural Eastern Ontario • Most municipalities are making provisions for landfill closure costs; also signs of forward-thinking re: expansions or new sites • Legacy assets mean ongoing operating costs (monitoring, attenuation zones, compliance with changing regulations) • Policies are changing (e.g. bag types, tag costs) and operators seeking to be innovative.

Page 203 of 253 Concluding Observations on Financial Sustainability

• Overall financial situation has not changed markedly in past year for the region as a whole • Structural nature of challenges in Rural Eastern Ontario puts extra emphasis on need to: a) accelerate economic development.., not a short-term fix b) find new ways to deliver services c) suggest policy changes to reduce unit costs d) take careful look at new ways to increase/generate revenue e) continue targeted discussions on infrastructure funding.

Page 204 of 253 r.

ià ‘ Connecting i!htern Ontario to the World

— ‘L. ., c

Project Update January 2013

EDRN ia EASTERN ONTARID REGIONAL NETWORK

Page 205 of 253 Project

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

The

Regional The largest will

The and

At speed Eastern

bandwidth

close

The competitive In

provincial, project

in-kind

5,500-kilometre

build In businesses quarter

Improved negotiated

addition

2012,

least

reach

Eastern

network bandwidth project

$170

the

local

The Overview The

completion broadband 2012

Mel

Internet

rural

contributions

rises

Ontario.

450,000

of

the

Network

Eastern urban-rural

million project

nearly Campbell

EOWC

rates

capacity.

access

2014. municipal

to

aims

to

for

Ontario

broadband Internet

network will

substantially

expanding

high-speed

to

Chair

services

rural

for

of is

Ontario

and

cover

one

project

to

fibre

ahead

at

the homes (EORN)

networks.

more

improve

Wardens’

packages least

Eastern

million

$70

marketplace. and

made

are

price

optic

Regional

an of

than

project.

featuring

million,

is high-speed

schedule

and

included.

private

area 95 to

Internet

to

being

gap one

substantial

backbone

people

access

These spearhead

Ontario

per

businesses

more

Caucus

Network

for

million of

5,500-kilometre

for

and

built

cent sector

more

10

satellite

services,

Internet

than

networks,

in

to

on

access,

Mbps

residents

residents

will

11

(EOWC)

through

of

the

and

budget,

than

progress,

and

counties

funding.

$260

homes

will

improve

Internet

services download

the

services

backhaul manage

the

of will

50,000

soon

including

which

created

million

the

rural awarding

and

access and

project

be

The

with

and

have

support

Eastern

with

completed

businesses. have

network.

connect

businesses Page 206 of253

square building

and speeds

the to

total

two

when

the

the

high-speed

access

also

higher

of

recent

also

create

Ontario.

single-tier

completion

Eastern

value

22

of

private

kilometres

and

aims

residents

Ontario’s

been

federal,

contracts

by

to

speeds

in

a

of

100G

the

high-

more

to

Ontario

the

sector

cities.

first

of

of

and

and

a to EDRN ASTERN ONTARIO REGIONAL NETWORK Lake Ontario

Timeline EORNZone Names Expected Service Contract EORNawarded contracts through Availability to Households Awarded to an open, competitive bidding SatelliteServices* AvailableNow Xplornet process to Internet service providers • Embrun AvailableNow Xplornet (lSPs)who demonstrated that Quinte-Loyalist AvailableNow Xplornet they would invest in building • local access networks that will I Northumberland AvailableNow Xplornet reach the greatest number of • Highlands Spring2013 BellAliant households. However, all Internet South Nation Spring2013 BellAliant&Xplornet service providers will have equal Haliburton Summer 2013 BellAliant access to the backbone in order to Kawartha Summer 2013 BellAliant,Nexicom&Xplornet expand their services. The project Ottawa ValleyNorth Fall2013 BellAliant will be completed in 2014, with opportunities for future growth. Ottawa ValleySouth Fall2013 BellAliant&Storm Lanark Fall2013 BellAliant&Storm The above map outlines how and I when the network will be built SD&G Fall2013 BellAliant&Xplornet and the lSPswho were awarded I Dorset Fall2013 BellAliant local access contracts. In some Sebright Fall2013 Xplornet

zones, more than one contract HastingsNorth FaIl2013 BellAliant was awarded in order to expand Thousand Islands FaH2013 Xplornet service to the greatest number of * Satelliteservice is currentlyavailableat improvedpricingthroughout the region. Satellitemay households possible. continue to be the technology that best serves remote areas or difficultterrain within allEORN Zones. Exactavailabilitywillbe established through the competitive bidding process.

Project Update January 2013 • EasternPageOntario 207Regional of 253Network 3 4 The of With reached

was Progress economic region, The a This networks scalable on 1) Ontario’s existing of million running length 2) total April EORN access providers backbone An from been The process expand combination private private infrastructure Eastern fibre enabling new schedule open Eastern Backbone Local regional structured critical project input of 2012, awarded. local has optic Ontario of networks construction improving cable sector sector significant fibre. 22 fibre the ensured a and and the (ISPs) growth. Access line awarded to from telecoms contracts piece high-speed Ontario all

largest has backbone, reach and network residents to optic of Regional backbone To transparent satellite from partners in investment of with who

Highlights wired connect spurred industry the get that the launched of the quality of milestones backbone contracts Ottawa three the Regional involved to will a participation region. their Network in will local

rural is coverage. and sense and Internet in a national based 1 network is millions invest 5,000 stakeholders, 5 of series the link main to competitive roughly networks access in wireless EORN businesses. to life •

broadband of build laying Network late of to project. the Project towards on Whitehorse. in of the kilometres components: and access providers 5,500 Internet of was zones 2012. a building contracts fibre of local the new Update technologies. scale, dollars high-capacity 520 supporting using multiple completed ISPs same bidding (EORN) across the kilometres. its As optic access Internet — The kilometres service January the have will goal of a of ranging local in project

network — as $70 a total the has 2013 This the The EORN for encourage have To 3) EORN-funded rates EORN Communications suite high-speed Ontario reached technologies, In represents The and schedule set March

for partners Building construction requirements EORN’s advocates monitoring EORN receives January ensure Internet same Satellite out ensuring goal means network an the for of is has also 31, improved long-term committed Internet Board customers. through satellite option from is in rates and comprehensive negotiated 2012, a an to on 2014. that tracks and the Internet services vendor major these and must create sites, stretching on open providing behalf residential of on network to any services

maintaining wired Internet Xplornet budget. Directors Inc. The subscriber the once the technical buy obligations be leap to This or and performance in access Internet a Page 208 of253 of Satellite improved performance project backbone, an complete level the resell wholesale the or ahead customers. significantly competitive 4G through have at and open services broadband All wireless community. started and for special network playing satellite and access experience. service of is business signed technology areas in are access staff currently services the and customer

the co-locate advanced both until bandwidth with offering connections. met rates services. field feedback private provider network are that is more marketplace operational contracts coverage,

network policy. operational. 2024. during users Xplornet and and responsible for that ahead cannot offers capacity service a on sector for Eastern and better new will will at it that of by be First Nations The EORNproject will help meet the important goal of improving FirstNations’ access to affordable broadband. EORNhas been working collaborativelywith the communities to ensure that the benefits of the network are shared with them.

In November of 2012, AldervilleFirstNation celebrated new fibre connections at key community hubs as part of the EORN project. High-speed Internet connections are now available at Alderville’scommunity centre, health services, student services and administrative offices. With download speeds of up to 10 Mbps, this will greatly enhance the servicesthat are available at these important community hubs, such as video conference capabilityand enhanced health services, learning and economic opportunities.

The Aldervilleaccess points connect to portions of new fibre optic cable that were laid by Bell Aliant and Bellthrough AldervilleFirstNation’s traditional lands and treaty area. Residents of AldervilleFirstNation willfurther benefit from the improved high-speed wireless Internet access being built in Northumberland County as part of EORN’slocal access networks.

This new high-speed connection will improve the quality of services that we can provide to our community members

— linking them to better health care services as well as new educational and economic opportunities.

Chief James Marsden AldervilleFirstNation

Project Update January 2013 • Eastern PageOntario 209Regional of 253Network 5 Local Access

Creating local networks

In order to develop “last mile” access from the fibre optic backbone to homes and businesses,

EORNcreated 15 zones within Eastern Ontario. Contracts for each zone have been signed with lSPsto build these local networks, which use new Internet access points to connect residents and businesses to the fibre optic backbone. A year ago, I started this company — now we have 11 full-time employees and Contracts were awarded based on an open and we’re hiring more every three months. competitive bidding process. Keycriteria included: We’re in Picton and we couldn’t do this • the geographic reach and number of without broadband. households covered by the network; • the speeds and bandwidth that will be achieved; Craig Schoen President and Founder Dealer Plus Inc. • competitive consumer pricing; Picton, Ontario • the financial investment by EORN;and, • the investment to be made by the company.

We now have reliable high-speed access thanks to EORN. This means that we can get our clients up-to-date, time-sensitive information quickly, without worrying that our connection might be down. It is another way that we can stay connected to our clients, improve the health care services we provide and get the word out about our services.

Amelia Drydyn, RM VillageMidwifery Care, Sharbot Lake

Page 210 of 253 4

UNITED COU PRESCOTT AND R Embrun Zone f Bouret ‘V • St. Isidore”• Xplornet Communications Inc. has expanded its fixed - 7 —.---..---- _)1— V_s’ \ Cess&rer wireless networks to reach a 960-square-kilometre area itrim/ • Max 1 .. around Embrun, in the southwest corner of United .,, •EmtjNITEDCOl the \ l Russell ‘TORMONç! Counties of Prescott and Russell.There are more than Avonrnore. GL 8,000 homes and businesses in the zone. Accessspeeds - Chesterville0• Finch ranging from 1.5 Mbps to up to 10 Mbps became Winchester a Long Sa available in December 2011. Mountain Ingleside •

Quinte-Loyalist Zone 2 Xplornet Communications Inc.expanded its fixed wireless network to reach an area of some 7,000 square kilometres LENNOX .r.,,.I V•”’• \ ;: ADDINGYON that includes all of PrinceEdward County, most of the COUNTY •o. southern half of Hastings County and Lennoxand Addington Kna,t - County, and a westerly portion of . Tr.ninn

• PIctQfl —V The largest zone in EORNnow allows nearly80,000 homes P1IINCE EDWARD COUNtY and businesses to connect wirelesslyto high-speed Internet.

The service packages offer speeds ranging from 1.5 Mbps to up to 10Mbps. Access in the zone went livein fall 2012.

No;od,l rboroughHasti Northumberland Zone Xplornet Communications Inc. a / Warkwo completed wireless Bailieboro_.. Roseneath network allowing more than 20,000 homes and — i • Castleton businesses to connect wirelesslyto high-speed Internet GardenHiflNORTHUMBERLAND • Cold Springs COUNTY Brig “ across an area that includes most of Northumberland W&come. • at on Coib County. The network provides much of POrtHope Cobourg the

nville 1,300-square-kilometre region with Internet speeds of Lake Ontario up to 10 Mbps. The servicecommenced in faIl2012.

Project Update January 2013 • Eastern PageOntario 211Regional of Network253 7 • G,,Iden L eiiain,, Highlands Zone BellAliantwillprovide a wired (DSL)solution to expand Foy,ouI. RENFNEW broadband access in this large region spanning some 3,800 Po,ne, COUNTY ‘r •: / square kilometres.The zone covers nearly 14,000 homes and businesses located in southwestern portions of Renfrew County, northwestern parts of Frontenac County and a small LENNOX portion of Lennoxand Addington County. INGTO N COUNTY -— BellAliant’snetwork will relyon nine of the new Internet \ FRONTENAC ‘. - COUNTY access points built within the zone. Itwillprovideservices Ard ‘. No,Sh Bok ranging from 1.5 Mbps to up to 16 Mbps, depending on the customer location and proximityto the access points. The servicewillbe available in early 2013.

Sot. South Nation Zone BellAliantand Xplornet Communications Inc.willexpand the

reach of their networks across this 1,200-square-kilometre area. /Rockland ignal’ . Plantagenet • Alfred • H There are more than 12,000 homes and businesses in the zone, UNITED COUNTIES OF which spans the northern and central portions of the United ,\ PRESCOTT AND RUSSE Counties of Prescott and Russell. Bourçjet • St. Isidore —‘ —- • --- • (DSL) densely Casselman BellAliantwillprovide wired serviceto more • , •Mt mbrun, populated areas, while Xplornet willextend access viawireless UNITED Internet using 17 existingstructures and two newly built ones.

The combined solution willprovide access speeds of up to 16 Mbps. The servicewillbe availableby spring 2013.

• Haliburton Zone BellAliantwillprovide a wired (DSL)solution that willexpand broadband access in the 2,700-square-kilometre area, which includes portions of HaliburtonCounty and a northern part of Peterborough County. Itwillcover more than 24,000 homes and businesses.

BellAliantwilllay 121 kilometresof new fibre optic cable and relyon eight new Internet access point within the region. The

service,ranging from 1.5 Mbps to up to 10 Mbps, willbe availableby summer 2013.

S Eastern Ontario Regional Network • Project Update January 2013 Page 212 of 253 U Kawarthas Zone BellAliant,Xplornet Communications Inc.and Nexicomwill • Aputoy improve high-speed access to 70,000 homes and businesses across / ht,rr • K.kf,rIt this 6,100-square-kilometre zone. The region includes portions of Peterborough County, Kawartha Lakes,as well as the northeastern corner of Northumberland County.

BellAliantwillprovidewired (DSL)serviceto more densely populated areas, while Xplornet willextend access viawireless Internet by upgrading more than 30 existingstructures and buildingthree new sites. It is anticipated that servicesfrom Bell Aliantand Xplornet willbe availableby summer 2013.

Nexicom,a well-established regional telecommunications company, upgraded 27 of their existingsites in order to extend the reach of their wireless Internet services.Thisservice,with speeds of up to 10 Mbps or more, became availableby fall 2012. ORr r Ottawa Valley North Zone BellAliantwillprovide a wired solution that willexpand broadband access in this large region spanning about 4,000 square kilometres nuN: r,,• and 31,000 homes and businesses. The region stretches through the —. RENFIIEW I..., C’ . COUNTY .,,f,,.,,• northern Ottawa Valleyand covers much of eastern RenfrewCounty. A‘ •.:5z1!r •1 The network willrelyon 65 kilometresof new fibre optic cable and two dozen remote access points. Itwilloffer speeds ranging from

1.5 Mbps to up to 16 Mbps, depending on the customer location and proximityto access points. Servicewillbe availablebyfaIl2013.

U Ottawa Valley South Zone .4. BellAliantand Storm Internet willprovide nearly40,000 homes and Hull • A Irrer businesses with improved access to high-speed Internet acrossthe rnprlor ‘. •—_ Ott .r r:r southern portion of Ottawa Valley.The area includes a smallpart • A ‘• of Frontenac County, eastern LanarkCounty, northern parts of the United Counties of Leedsand Grenvilleand a northwestern corner F of the United Counties of Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry.

BellAliantwillprovide servicein more densely populated areas “ UNITED COUNTIES 7”OF LEEDS AND GRENVILLE AD around Portland, Smith Fallsand Kemptvillewith 76 kilometres ir. r •. •.. It • AtIuNrs r of new fibre optic cable and new access points. Storm Internet, a Bron.rll regional Internet service provider,willadd 40 new sites and upgrade .2 r ‘P/.Ihrt! existingsites to expand the reach and speed of their existing wireless network across the area. The network willoffer speeds of up to 10 Mbps. The servicewillbe availableby fall 2013.

Project Update january 2013 • Eastern PageOntario 213Regional of 253Network 9 • Lanark Zone BellAliantand Storm Internet willimprove high-speed Internet access to more than 12,000 homes and businesses across the western portion of LanarkCounty.The area also includesa small part of Frontenac County.

BellAliantwillprovide servicein more densely populated areas around Perth, Lanark, MacDonald’sCorners and Maberlywith 44 kilometresof new fibre optic cable and 11 new access points. Storm Internet, a regional Internet serviceproviderwith a base in Perth, willadd 13 new sites and upgrade 66 existingsites to expand the reach and speed of their existingwireless network across the area. Accessspeeds of up to 16 Mbps willbe offered. The servicewillbe availableby fall 2013.

Stormont, • Stormont, Dundas and Glengarry Zone ,,.‘ r I • “ “ UNITED COUNTIES OF . • Bell PRESCOTT Aliantand Xplornet Communications Inc.willextend AND RUS5EI :0, broadband access across a zone of 29,000 households located ‘icc across much of the United Counties of Stormont, Dundas and UNITED COUNTIES OF ‘“STORMONT. DUNDAS Glengarry,and an eastern portion of the United Counties of GLENGARRY • F,,, I, S.yd.O Prescott and Russell. r • C

I.. • • Corn oII BellAliantwillexpand their wired (DSL)serviceto more densely populated areas with 53 kilometresof new fibre, while Xplornet willextend its existingwirelessservicesby buildingthree new sites and upgrading or rebuilding27 existingsites. The service,with speeds of up to 16 Mbps, willbe availableby fall 2013.

• Dorset Zone BellAliantwillprovide a wired solution that willimprove access to high-speed Internet for 1,800 homes and businessesin the area surrounding Dorset, inthe northeast of HaliburtonCounty.

The network willrelyon 16 kilometresof new fibre optic cable and a new Internet access point in this small, predominantlycottage community.Accessspeeds willrange from 2 Mbpsto up to 16 Mbps, depending on the customer locationand proximityto the access point. The servicewillbe availablebyfall 2013.

10 Eastern Ontario Regional Network • Project Update January 2013 Page 214 of 253 B Sebright Zone Gravenhurst Xplornet Communications Inc.willbuild a wireless network to improve high-speed access to about 800 homes and businesses in a 250-square- / kilometre area surrounding Sebright, located in the •Sebright northwestern corner of Kawartha Lakes.The service, Orillia I •c&co . which willoffer speeds of up to 10 Mbps, willbe • Kirkfiold availableby fall 2013. Bobca _\—;; eaverton AW

B Hastings North Zone BellAliantwillprovide a wired (DSL)solution that will expand broadband access to about 9,000 homes and businesses in the northern part of HastingsCounty. More than 40 per cent are seasonal properties.

The network willinclude 77 kilometresof new fibre optic cable and five new Internet access points. Servicewill range from 2 Mbps to up to 16 Mbps, depending on the customer location and proximityto the access points. Servicewillbe availableby faIl2013.

B Thousand Islands Zone

- 4 “ Xplornet Communications Inc.willbuild a wireless network ..ANARK Snth FIIs J PIh • to reach 33,000 homes in this 3,200-square-kilometre > J(JNITED COUNTIES .4 - / OFjEEDS AND OHENVILLE region. The area includessouthern parts of the United ‘Proscott F,,t,J Nord,A:g.t. Counties of Leedsand Grenvilleand Frontenac County. \EIg,. Mh*fl. • Br,ckvII .‘-:: The network willleverage existingstructures and more than a dozen new sites to provide access speeds of up to 10 Mbps. Servicewillbe availableby fall 2013.

Project update January 2013 • EasternPageOntario 215Regional of 253Network 11 EDRN 0 EASTERN DNTARID REGIDNAL NETWDRK

For more information, contact: LisaSeverson

Communications & Stakeholder Relations Officer Eastern Ontario Regional Network Phone: 613-925-7010 Email:[email protected] www.eorn.ca

Page 216 of 253

4

REGIDNAL NETWDRK

EASTERN D DNTARI January 2013 10, ED RN

Page 217 of 253

EOWC Update

Network__

Eastern Ontario Regional

3. Affordable rates: Affordable Pricing

Page 218 of 253

households/businesses

2. Higher Speeds: Up tolO Mbps for 85% of

households & businesses

1. Access: 95% of the

bandwidth demands

A Network Superhighway built to grow with

REGIONAL

NETWORK

What

is EORN?

EASTERN ONTARIO f% EDRN

Page 219 of 253

REGIONAL NETWORK

How Big Is It?

EASTERN DNTARID EDRN 4’ EDRN What is EORN? EASTERN ONTARIO REGIONAL NETWORK

It’s a model of public-private collaboration and joint investment;

• It’s multi-government endeavour working towards a shared goal;

• It’s the vision of the Eastern Ontario Wardens’

Page 220 of253 Caucus

• It’s a game changer; EDRN EORN Funding FormuIa EASTERN ONTARIO REGIONAL NETWORK

Canada $55m I>

Ontario $55m I>

Private Sector I> $50m Page 221 of253

EOWC Inc. $lOm FORN Investment EDRN EASTERN DNTARID Leveraging RESIDNAL NETWDRK

What Does This Mean For Eastern Ontario?

Provincial 3tol Federal 3tol Private 3 to 1

Page 222 of253 Municipal 20 to 1

• EOWC never will operate the network

first 7 years Page 223 of 253

• EOWC/EORN owns 51% of network the for

government until 2024

sector partners and the upper of levels

• EOWC contractually bound to both the private

partners

• Network operated be by will private sector

REGIDNAL NETWORK

EORN Operation

EASTERN DNTARID 1% EDRN ZE

Dz bJOH

• 0 za)

(‘3 -c - U (3 cci U) U) a) a) U) U c CL) U 0 a) u a) U) cI. w U) 0 a) U - (‘3 a) (‘3 (‘3 U) -J CO iU-0I- Page 224 of 253

Page 225 of 253

$90 million

B) Access to Residents and Businesses

$7OmUhon (budgeted)

A) Ethernet Backbone Transport

Two Major Phases (Concurrently)

REGIONAL NETWORK

Construction Phases

EASTERN LJNTARID aa EDRN

—-

I

I

-r t1

Page 226 of 253

/1/’

1

p-u,

-

IIb

Bell E9

Construction

REGDNAL NETWDRK

EASTERN DNTARID :

EDRN Backhaul Fibre Page 227 of 253 of 227 Page

(D (‘I

I

(D N 0

;ij P1 Gi C z r za mz Hz

• Significant savings to customers

anywhere

Canada in

Page 228 of 253

customer on any new pricing offered

• “Best in price” discount any for EOWC

customers

solutions become available to satellite

• Special opt out provision where terrestrial

capacities for

users

• New satellites mean higher speeds and

Highlights

REL3IDNAL NETWDRK

EASTERN DNTARID J’,

EDRN Satellite Service

released shortly a with budget of $9-15m

LI to RFP connect business parks fibre with be will

of 4 Li Nations First 6 participating -Alderville complete

access. mile

Li $11 million savings in Backbone transferred to

last Page 229 of 253

in-service POP’s months four of ahead schedule —

Backbone Li 5,500 of kms fibre connecting the 160

residents satellite a with service up of to 5Mb.

are providing access for 95% over of all EOWC

U new Two satellites launched by XCI in 2011/20 12

89% vs. (+450,000 85% homes and businesses)

Will U beat coverage our targets lOMb/lMb/lOOGb for

$93 U million contributed in assets $250m project =

$58 Over U million in private sector cash contributions

.

REGIDNALNETWDRK

How are doing? we EASTERN

Promote U EORN worldwide Page 230 of 253

LI Monitor contracts

adoption, health education, and better govt services

LI year 10 to plan promote economic development,

released shortly a with budget $9-15m of

LI Connecting 50+ business parks with fibre be will

REGIDNAL

NETWDRK

What’s

Next?

EASTERN ONTARID IS EDRN

I

2010

CA Signed h

2010

-2014 Page 231 of 253

construction

2014 -2024

Reporting

2014 Beyond + Monitoring &

Development ontract

Econ & Social

Leveraging

REGIDNAL

NETWDRK

Timelines

EASTERN DNTARID •1ED RN Page 232 of 253 E9Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus www.eowc.org

NEWS RELEASE

EOWC elects new Chair and Vice-Chair, sets 2013 priorities

January 14, 2013 NEWS

The Eastern Ontario Wardens’ Caucus Inc. has elected RickPhillips, Warden of Hastings County as its new Chair for the coming year. Ron Holman, Warden of the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville was elected Vice-Chair.

BACKGROUND

Each January the 13 members of the EOWCalso review their activities from the previous year and set their priorities for the coming year. Last week the members met in Kingston for two days to conduct this important task and shared these issues with M.P.s and M.P.P.s from around the region.

QUOTES

“I am honoured to have been elected Chair by my colleagues. We have a great team and

I look forward to working as hard as Ican with them over the course of the coming year,” said Phillips. “Iam equally delighted that Warden Holman will be our Vice-Chair. He brings a tremendous amount of insight and leadership to the Caucus having served previously on the EOWC,”added Phillips.

“Aswe do each year early in January the EOWCmeets in Kingston to set the priorities and directions for the Caucus as we continue to work to make Eastern Ontario’s economy grow which assists people in finding work,” said Phillips.

“Thisyear we are focusing on two key priorities,” noted Vice-Chair Holman. “They are economic development and the strategies needed to support new growth, and continuing our financial sustainability research and analysis on key sectors like water and wastewater, waste management and social housing” that support our advocacy efforts.

I

Page 233 of 253 “We believe we can make some significant strides forward by zeroing in on the two key priorities, while being prepared to deal with other issues that might arise,” said Peterborough County Warden J. Murray Jones.

2013 Priorities:

Priority #1: Economic Development

The primary objective to foster growth and development for the region will be to create an Eastern Ontario Economic Development Strategy. This means working with the EOWCpartners in the cities, including Ottawa, the federal and provincial governments, agencies like Community Futures Development Corporations, local economic development groups, First Nation leaders and health and education institutions.

Strategy components will include areas like:

• business retention • skills development • completion of the building of the EORNproject • Algonquin land claim

Priority #2: Financial Sustainability

In the past year the EOWChas commissioned significant research on key topics that relate to the challenges and opportunities of keeping municipalities financially sustainable. Last year’s efforts focused on determining the kinds of investments that are needed to address for example the capital improvements for the nearly 88,000 kilometers of the region’s roads and 8,600 bridges. In the case of roads and bridges the data has exposed a growing deficit of nearly $3 billion in needed capital investments.

In 2013 the EOWCis expanding its research into other key municipal service including:

• social housing • waste management • asset management • roads and bridges fund

-30- For more information contact:

Rick Phillips, Chair or Ron Holman, Vice-Chair (613) 966-1319 (613) 342-3840

2

Page 234 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: J. Murray Jones, Warden

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: Meetings attended during December 2012

Recommendation: Receive for information

The following is a list of meetings and functions I attended as Warden of Peterborough County during the month of December. The time spent preparing for the follow-up of these meetings and the time spent on behalf of the Township of Douro-Dummer is not documented.

December 1 ● Lang Volunteer Awards ● Peterborough Santa Clause Parade December 3 ● Meeting with Canoe Museum ● Special JSSC Meeting December 4 ● Meeting with Humane Society December 5 ● Special County Council (Warden’s Election) December 6 ● Warden’s Committee ● Nominating Committee December 7 ● County Council December 8 ● Community Alternative Funeral Home Grand Opening December 10 ● Staff Meeting ● Management Team December 14 ● Aggregate Meeting – Lindsay ● Warden’s Committee December 17 ● Minister Chiarelli Announcement December 18 ● HR Screening Meeting December 19 ● County Council December 20 ● MEDI Greetings at GPA EDC

Respectfully submitted,

Original signed by

J. Murray Jones, Warden

Page 235 of 253 Page 236 of 253

The County of Peterborough County Council

To: Warden and Members of Council

From: Barry Rand, Deputy Warden

Date: January 23, 2013

Subject: Meetings attended during December 2012

Recommendation: Receive for Information

The following is a list of meetings and functions I attended as Deputy Warden of Peterborough County during the month of December. The time spent preparing for the follow-up of these meetings and the time spent on behalf of the Township of North Kawartha is not documented.

December 3 ● Waste Management Master Plan Update Steering Committee December 5 ● Warden’s Lunch and Special County Council (Warden’s Election) December 6 ● Warden’s Committee ● Community Care Kilometres for Care December 7 ● County Council December 10 ● Management Team December 14 ● Warden’s Committee December 19 ● County Council

Respectfully submitted,

Original signed by

Barry Rand, Deputy Warden

Page 237 of 253 Page 238 of 253 Page 239 of 253 Page 240 of 253 Page 241 of 253 Page 242 of 253 4. d) Corporation of the Township of SSmith-Ennismore-Lakefieldd

Date: November 16, 2010 To: Reeve Millen & Members of Council From: Robert Lamarre, Manager of Building and Planning Subject: Stop Up and Close – Surplus Sections of Road Allowance Water Street – Lakefield Ward

Status: For Endorsement

Recommendation

That the report of the Manager of Building and Planning with respect to the stop up and closure of surplus sections of the Water Street road allowance be received for information; and

That Council deem those lands described as part of the road allowance known as Water Street and further described as Parts 1, 2 and 3 of Plan 45R-15025 to be surplus to our needs; and further that a By-law be brought forward for Council’s consideration at a future meeting to authorize the execution of any necessary documents required to finalize the transaction.

Information

Council will recall that two very significant projects took place on Water Street this year. The Township expanded its Main Sewage Pumping Station and constructed force mains within the road allowance leading to the treatment lagoon and the County reconstructed Water Street from Block Road to Bridge Street.

It is customary to requisition a survey of the road allowance limits prior to undertaking projects of the scope and nature of those noted above to ensure that we have a thorough understanding of the limits of our ownership. The survey commissioned as a result of these projects revealed that a significant stretch of Water Street from Nichols Street south approx. 210 metres was noted as having been quit claimed to the Village of Lakefield. Although this section of road has been maintained by the County of Peterborough for a prolonged period (over 50 years) it did not appear to be in their ownership. Further investigation into the title history of this parcel of land revealed further ambiguity in terms of ownership. Our solicitor has managed to have the property placed in the Land Titles Qualified system with the Township as the owner. Our goal is to convey the road allowance to the County of Peterborough once we’ve completed a few adjustments as described below.

Another peculiarity established by the surveyor was the shape of the road allowance wherein the road allowance unexpectedly widens significantly (see attached excerpt of Plan 45R-15025). The widened portion described as Parts 1, 2 and 3 on the Plan are surplus to our and the County’s needs. Our intention is to convey these three parts to the abutting land owners and to convey Part 4 to the Page 243 of 253 4. d) County for continued use as a public thoroughfare. I have discussed this scenario with each of the benefiting property owners as well as the County and have received unanimous approval to move forward.

We are in receipt of two applications to purchase the surplus portions described as Parts 1 and 3. Part 2 is to be conveyed to the Township and will be added to the lands which currently house our main sewage pumping station.

In accordance with our procedure for closure and disposal of road allowances, Township Council must first deem the road allowance to be surplus to our needs.

Following such a resolution, we would proceed to bring forward a by-law to stop up and close Parts 1, 2 and 3 of the Plan in accordance with Municipal Act requirements which prescribe that notice of our intention be provided and that a public meeting be held to consider input. Following the closure, deeds would be created and Parts 1, 2 and 3 would be conveyed to abutting land owners and Part 4 would be conveyed to the County.

Financial Impact

In accordance with our policy, we have collected the prescribed $10.00 per foot purchase fee and the $2,100.00 deposit from both benefitting land owners (Part 1, Napa Auto Parts and Part 3 Savage Arms). The advertising, survey and legal costs associated with the process will be shared equally amongst the three benefitting lands owners (Napa, Savage and the Township). The $2,100.00 deposit should be sufficient to cover each of the participant’s share of the expenses.

Strategic Plan Reference

Infrastructure Support: To strategically manage, enhance and renew the Township’s physical, social and technological infrastructure to meet the demands of a thriving community.

Attachments

Excerpt form Plan 45R-15025 which depicts the section of Water Street in question.

Robert Lamarre ______Prepared By: Robert Lamarre, Manager of Building and Planning

Janice Lavalley ______Reviewed By: Janice Lavalley, CAO

Page 244 of 253 4. d) Attch 1 Page 245 of 253 Page 246 of 253

Minutes Of Joint Services Steering Committee January 10, 2013 Sutherland Room City Hall

Draft Minutes Not Approved

The meeting was called to order at 3:45 p.m. by Councillor Gerow in the Sutherland Room, City Hall.

Present: Councillor Ron Gerow, County of Peterborough Councillor Andy Mitchell, County of Peterborough Councillor Jim Whelan, County of Peterborough Mayor Daryl Bennett, City of Peterborough Councillor Len Vass, City of Peterborough

Regrets: Warden J. Murray Jones, County of Peterborough Councillor Andrew Beamer, City of Peterborough Councillor Henry Clarke, City of Peterborough

Staff: John Butler, Director of Finance/Treasurer, County of Peterborough Brian Horton, Chief Administrative Officer, City of Peterborough Malcolm Hunt, Director of Planning and Development Services, City of Peterborough Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services, City of Peterborough Patricia Lester, City Solicitor and Director of Legal Services, City of Peterborough Dorothy Olver, Manager, Homelessness/Addictions, Social Services Division, City of Peterborough (4:05 p.m.) Susan Bacque, Manager of Housing, City of Peterborough (4:05 p.m.) Linda Mitchelson, Manager, Social Services Division, City of Peterborough Natalie Garnett, Deputy City Clerk, City of Peterborough Mike Gannon, Employment Services Program Manager, City of Peterborough (4:05 p.m.)

Disclosure of Interest

There were no Disclosures of Interest.

Appointment of Chair and Vice-Chair

Mayor Bennett nominated Councillor Gerow as Chair, and Councillor Gerow respectfully declined.

Page 247 of 253 Joint Services Steering Committee Meeting Of Thursday, January 10, 2013 Page 2

Moved by Councillor Whelan, seconded by Mayor Bennett

That Councillor Mitchell be appointed as Chair of the Joint Services Steering Committee for 2013.

“CARRIED”

Councillor Vass nominated Mayor Bennett as Vice Chair, and Mayor Bennett respectfully declined.

Moved by Mayor Bennett, seconded by Councillor Vass

That Councillor Beamer be appointed as Vice Chair of the Joint Services Steering Committee for 2013.

“CARRIED”

Resolution to Meet in Closed Session

Moved by Councillor Whelan, seconded by Councillor Vass

That Committee move into closed session at 3:49 p.m., to discuss one item under Section 239(2)(a) The security of the property of the Municipality or Local Board.

“CARRIED”

Moved by Councillor Whelan, seconded by Councillor Vass

That Committee rise from closed session at 4:05 p.m.

“CARRIED”

Minutes of the Meetings of October 11, 2012 and December 3, 2012

Moved by Mayor Bennett, seconded by Councillor Gerow

That the minutes of the meetings of October 11, 2012 and December 3, 2012, be approved.

"CARRIED"

Page 248 of 253 Joint Services Steering Committee Meeting Of Thursday, January 10, 2013 Page 3

Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest

There were no disclosures of Pecuniary Interest.

Minutes for Information

Moved by Councillor Whelan, seconded by Councillor Vass

That the AHAC (Affordable Housing Action Committee) minutes of September 13, October 11, and November 8, 2012 be received for information.

"CARRIED"

Report CSSSJSSC13-001 Community Service Mapping Project Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services, City of Peterborough

Moved by Councillor Whelan, seconded by Mayor Bennett

That Report CSSSJSSC13-001 be deferred.

“CARRIED”

Report CSSSSJSSC13-002 Peterborough Employment Resource Centre (PERC) Update Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services, City of Peterborough

Moved by Councillor Whelan, seconded by Mayor Bennett

That the Joint Services Steering Committee endorses the recommendation outlined in Report CSSSJSSC13-002 dated January 10, 2013, of the Director of Community Services, as follows:

That the Committee receive the report for information.

Committee at its meeting of January 10, 2013 added the following:

That the provision of PERC services be ended following the current extension to August 2013, subject to a report at the June 13th meeting providing details on the provision of employment services.

“CARRIED”

Page 249 of 253 Joint Services Steering Committee Meeting Of Thursday, January 10, 2013 Page 4

Report PLHDJSSC13-001 10-year Housing and Homelessness Plan Update – Information Report Malcolm Hunt, Director of Planning and Development Services, City of Peterborough Ken Doherty, Director of Community Services, City of Peterborough

A presentation was provided by Tim Welch, Tim Welch Consulting.

Moved by Councillor Whelan, seconded by Mayor Bennett

That Joint Services Steering Committee endorse the recommendation outlined in Report PLHDJSSC13-001 dated January 10, 2013, of the Director of Planning and Development Services, as follows:

That the 10-year Housing and Homelessness Plan Update report and presentation be received for information.

“CARRIED”

CORRESPONDENCE

Other Business

Ms. Mitchelson spoke to a letter dated December 27, 2012 from the Ministry of Community and Social Services regarding one-time grant funding to support the Transition to the Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI).

Moved by Councillor Gerow, seconded by Councillor Vass

That the verbal report on a one-time grant to support the transition to the Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI) be received for information.

“CARRIED”

Next Meeting

The next regular meeting is scheduled for June 13, 2013.

Page 250 of 253 Joint Services Steering Committee Meeting Of Thursday, January 10, 2013 Page 5

Adjournment

Moved by Mayor Bennett, seconded by Councillor Vass

That the Joint Services Steering Committee adjourn at 4:56 p.m.

"CARRIED"

Natalie Garnett Deputy City Clerk

Councillor Mitchell Chair

Page 251 of 253 Page 252 of 253 Future Meeting Schedule Council Authorized Meetings

January . January 22 - 9:30 a.m. - Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee (Lang Pioneer Village, MacKelvie Room) . January 23 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council . January 28 - 9:00 a.m. - Transportation Plan Update Steering Committee (310 Armour Road, EMS Training Room) . January 30 - 3:00 p.m. - Accessibility Advisory Committee (Boardroom)

February . February 6 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council . February 6 - 12:00 p.m. - County Council Photographs (Main Foyer) . February 19 - 9:30 a.m. - Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee and Christmas Lunch (Lang Pioneer Village, MacKelvie Room) . February 20 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council . February 27- 3:00 p.m. - Accessibility Advisory Committee (S-E-L Lower Level Boardroom) . February 28 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council Special Meeting (2013 Draft Budget)

March . March 4 - 2:00 p.m. - Waste Management Committee (City Hall, General Committee Room) . March 6 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council . March 20 - 9:30 a.m. - County Council . March 26 - 9:30 a.m. - Lang Pioneer Village Museum Advisory Committee (Lang Pioneer Village, MacKelvie Room) . March 27- 3:00 p.m. - Accessibility Advisory Committee (S-E-L Lower Level Boardroom) . March 28 - 9:30 a.m. - Land Division Committee (Council Chamber)

Other Meetings/Events – For Your Information

Page 253 of 253