DOCSLIB.ORG

Measuring Soil Productivity: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Measuring Soil Productivity: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading? Measuring Soil Productivity: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading? Nicole Rabe (Land Resource Specialist) Environmental Management Branch (OMAFRA) November 23, 2017 Agenda • Components of Soil Health • 4W’s of provincial soil map renewal initiatives • Precision ag data on farm & opportunities for site-specific soil health sampling & remediation • Summary Case Study: Linking soil health, mapping to crop productivity Soil Health Physical Chemical Biological Soil Function, Properties & Health Soil Compaction %OM Texture Flora and fauna Aggregate Macro/micro Stability PMN pH Mineral compounds Nutrient level Why are we renewing soil maps in Ontario? Making 21st Century decisions with mid-20th Century information Maps generated over 80 year period. Many have never had any updates or revision 5 Who is doing soil map renewal in Ontario? • Collaborative effort – AAFC (Xiaoyuan Geng) – U of G (Asim Biswas) – OMAFRA • Projects – Lake Erie watershed – Grand River watershed – GLASI Priority Sub-watersheds – Ottawa – Peterborough County • Techniques (using R): – cLHS – Optimization – Predictive modelling – Polygon disaggregation 6 Physical Where are we renewing soil maps in the near term? • Ottawa Urban Fringe • Peterborough County • Cochrane – Hearst • Temiskaming Shores 7 • GRCA • Greater Golden Horseshoe What were the legacy conventions of soil mapping? Clay Example: Soils of the Ottawa Area Loam Sand • Legacy maps were over designed for hard copy readability (e.g. Clay 1”=1mile) Shallow • Conventions were digitized and transcribed into GIS • Now found in an Clay interactive map viewer - Ag Info Atlas: Glacial Till ontario.ca/agmaps Drumlins 8 What are the current day technologies used in soil map Physical renewal? 2 yr LiDAR project • 3 planned capture areas ~ 30,000 sq km • leaf off: fall 2016 and spring 2017 • Open data • Detailed DEM products 9 OMAFRA Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) Projects • Ottawa Soil Survey Project Ottawa – Phase 1 – Urban Fringe: 855 sq. km (85,500 ha) – Phase 2 – Ottawa-Carleton: 1,381 sq. km (138,100 ha) – Ottawa West Pilot: 44 sq. km (4,435 ha) – Ottawa East Pilot: 38 sq. km (3,822 ha) Peterborough • Peterborough Soil Survey Project – 4,211 sq. km (421,100 ha) 6 km – Keene Pilot Area: 120 sq. km (12,000 ha) – South Monaghan Pilot Area: 110 sq. km (11,000 Digital ha) Elevation Model (DEM) 10 10km Physical Topographic Derivatives: Slope Peterborough Ottawa 6 km 10km 11 Physical Topographic Derivatives: Topographic Wetness Index Peterborough Ottawa 6 km 10km 12 Covariates: Surficial Geology Physical Peterborough Ottawa 6 km 10km 13 Physical Covariates - Thorium Ottawa Peterborough 6 km 10 km 14 Site Selection • Conditioned Latin Hypercube (cLHS) • Landscape variability-based • Uses all inputs – LiDAR – Radiometrics – Environmental 15 Optimal # of Site Inspections Peterborough (left) Ottawa (right) • Optimal number of sites = 525 • Optimal at CV = 0.95 16 Horizons Physical Chemical Ap horizon – Plow layer – High in organic matter Ae horizon – Eluviated (bleached) – Lost iron, clay Bg horizon – Mottles (gleyed, waterlogged) Ckg horizon – C(k)arbonates, mottles 17 Provincial to field scale… 18 Field Scale: Soil Health Testing New Physical Chemical Biological 19 Wellington County (74ac) Woodrill Farms : Rainbarrel Soil Health Score (OM x Soil Type – Soil Map) 0 20 25 1 2 3 4 27 9 years of yield Beginning of a predictive digital soil map…..joining layers data in the index Proxy to soil texture = electrical conductivity (proxy to soil tecture) Red = low EC 0-5ms/m Lighter soil / sand Bue = high EC 5-25 ms/m Silts >> loam Courtesy Doug Aspinall (Woodrill Farms) Blues: convex, depressional, high yield Oranges: concave, ridge, low yield 3D Yellows: low yield, level to depression Greens: high yield, nearly level, gentle slope Soil Health & Crop Productivity • Moved sites to be more representative of soil types in 2017 – re-sampled 5 sites • Corn yield in a DRY 2016 growing season Sample ID Soil Type Texture SH Score 2016 Corn Yield 16WRF1 Tuscola Silt Loam 82 208.6 16WRF2 Grandby Sandy Loam 90 84.0 16WRF3 Bookton Sandy Loam 87 197.5 16WRF4 Bookton Sandy Loam 80 169.7 16WRF5 Hillsburg Fine Sandy Loam 85 197.5 16WRF6 Hillsburg Fine Sandy Loam 77 134.2 16WRF7 Fox Sandy Loam 73 57.2 17WR8a Tuscola Silt Loam 100 220.8 16WRF9 Bookton Sandy Loam 88 233.5 17WR10a Bookton Sandy Loam 93 136.8 17WR11a Rainbarrel LFS Loamy Fine Sand 83 158.9 16WRF12 Grandby Sandy Loam 75 196.1 16WRF13 Grandby Sandy Loam 84 127.5 17WR14a Teeswater Silt Loam 80 253.5 16WRF15 Fox Sandy Loam 72 77.9 Best Soil Restoration Management & Remediation Practices Economics · Lobb research showed a 40 to 130% yield increase in dry years and 10 to 33% in wet years · 2 to 20% reduction in removal area · Overall net increase in crop Remediation production None · Cost recovered in 4 to 6 years · Farmer experience - 80% yield increase on the knoll and 10% yield decrease in the removal area 24 Future Steps: “SMART”er Sampling Topography Slope Sample Plan Wetness URL: ontario.ca/soils Soil Health Matters! Comment: ontario.ca/ebr Open Houses: 1. November 22, St. Isidore Recreation Centre, 20 de l'Arena Street, St. Isidore, ON K0C 2B0 (5-9pm) 2. November 27, Woodstock OMAFRA office, Unit 1 - 401 Lakeview Drive, Woodstock, ON. N4T 1W2 (6-9pm) 3. November 28, Chatham area (Country View Golf Course, 25393 St. Clair Road. R. R. #1. Dover Centre, ON. N0P 1L0) (1-4pm and 6-9pm) 4. December 14, Codrington Community Centre, 2992 Rd 30, Codrington, ON, K0K 1R0(3-6pm) 5. December 15, Flesherton KinPlex, 2 Highland Dr., Flesherton N0C 1E0 (3:15-5:30 pm) 26 Questions or Comments? Nicole Rabe (OMAFRA Land Resource Specialist) phone: (226) 979-6271 Email: [email protected] Follow us on Twitter! @ONAgEnviro 27 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capsule Railway History of Peterborough County
    23ae Peterborough County – A Capsule Railway History BACKGROUND Before the Railway Age, travel and the movement of goods in Upper Canada were primarily dependent on wa- terways, and primitive trails that passed for roads. Needless to say, both of these modes of transportation relied very much on the weather of the seasons. Agitation for a more efficient mode of transportation had started to build with the news of the new-fangled railroad, but the economic depression of 1837 and the years following were bad years for Upper Canada and for railway development, especially in view of the unsettled economic and political conditions in England, on whose financial houses the crucial investment in railway ventures de- pended. However, in 1849 the Province of Canada passed the Railway Guarantee Act which guaranteed the interest on loans for the construction of railways not less than 75 miles in length. It was this legislation that trig- gered Canada's railway building boom. While the Grand Trunk Railway of Canada (GTR), incorporated in 1852, busied itself with its trunk line along Lake Ontario, the waterfront towns were busy with their own railway ambitions. They saw themselves as gate- ways to the untapped resources of the "hinterland". Thus emerged a pattern of "development roads" from Whit- by, Port Hope, Cobourg, Trenton, Belleville, Napanee, Kingston, Brockville and Prescott. (Toronto had already led the way with its portage road to Collingwood, and later participated in additional development roads to Owen Sound and Coboconk.) North of Lake Ontario were rich natural resources and a rapidly expanding population as successive waves of immi- grants had to seek land further north from Lake Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Liberty
    2013 ACCESS AND PRIVACY Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada FREEDOM & LIBERTY 2013 STATISTICS In free and open societies, governments must be accessible and transparent to their citizens. TABLE OF CONTENTS Requests by the Public ...................................... 1 Provincial Compliance ..................................... 3 Municipal Compliance ................................... 12 Appeals .............................................................. 26 Privacy Complaints .......................................... 38 Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) .................................. 41 As I look back on the past years of the IPC, I feel that Ontarians can be assured that this office has grown into a first-class agency, known around the world for demonstrating innovation and leadership, in the fields of both access and privacy. STATISTICS 4 1 REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC UNDER FIPPA/MFIPPA There were 55,760 freedom of information (FOI) requests filed across Ontario in 2013, nearly a 6% increase over 2012 where 52,831 were filed TOTAL FOI REQUESTS FILED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,995 17,334 34,329 Provincial 7,029 14,402 21,431 Total 24,024 31,736 55,760 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,726 17,304 34,030 Provincial 6,825 13,996 20,821 Total 23,551 31,300 54,851 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY SOURCE AND JURISDICTION Municipal Provincial Total
    [Show full text]
  • Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project
    Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 1 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project Identifying a Natural Heritage System (NHS) for the Kawartha Region kawarthasnaturally.ca Report CSD12-014 Page 2 of 13 Protecting Your Natural Environmental and Cultural Heritage in the Kawarthas Report CSD12-014 Page 3 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected is a Priority Action for Sustainable Peterborough…………… Natural Assets Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 4 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project Identifying a Natural Heritage System (NHS) Natural Heritage Systems • “…a system made up of natural heritage features and areas linked by natural corridors which are necessary to maintain biodiversity…can include lands that have been restored and areas with potential to be restored…” (Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2005) • A system that maintains the health of the landscape, and the health of our communities. • An essential backbone of sustainability, including economic. • A system of green infrastructure providing critical ecosystem services. Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 5 of 13 Many organizations and agencies are involved in land management but are their activities integrated? Southern Ontario: A Fragmented Landscape Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 6 of 13 What is a Natural Heritage System (NHS)? • Features and areas: – Wetlands – Woodlands – Lakes – Streams – Meadows – Cultural Heritage Features – Plants and animals they contain D. Puric-Mladenovic – Respects cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Agenda Was Developed Simultaneously with the 2013- 2015 Business Plan
    PETERBOROUGH – LAKEFIELD POLICE SERVICES BOARD STRATEGIC AGENDA November 2012 INDEX page Introduction 3 Basic Assumptions 5 Observations and Analysis 6 Police Priorities 11 List of Reference Documents 13 MPM Consulting Hodgson Associates Page 2 Introduction As part of its regular business planning process, the Peterborough Lakefield Police Services Board decided to create a corollary report that would focus on a period much longer than the three year timeframe for the Business Plan. This Strategic Agenda was developed simultaneously with the 2013- 2015 Business Plan. Information gained through review of existing documentation as well as observations and opinions provided during the consultation phase of the business planning process, provided the basis for the recommendations contained in the Strategic Agenda. The Peterborough Lakefield Police Service is considered a leader in the provision of community based policing. By following the principles and priorities contained in the Strategic Agenda, the Board can continue this strong commitment to the communities it represents. The Strategic Agenda depends on projections that have already been developed with respect to the long term changes identified for both communities. By studying these trends, the Board can develop general directions for the Peterborough Lakefield Community Police Service that will direct the planning process and provide guidance for changes that are planned for the operation and administration of the Police Service. Ultimately the Strategic Agenda should provide a basis for fundamental organizational improvements that will occur in the next few decades. It should also assist the Board in determining which financial, and human resource, investments best reflect the realities in these changing communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Mr. Doherty
    Descendants of Mr. Doherty Generation 1 1. MR.1 DOHERTY . He married MRS. DOHERTY. Mr. Doherty and Mrs. Doherty had the following children: 2. i. JAMES2 DOHERTY was born in 1797 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 08 Apr 1856 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Honora O'Donnell in 1834 in Clogheen, Tipperary, Ireland (Marriage of Jacob Doherty and Honora Donnell). She was born in 1811 in Co Tipperary, Ireland. She died on 05 Jan 1888 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. 3. ii. WILLIAM DOHERTY was born in 1799 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 10 Jun 1857 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Catherine Maxy on 16 Feb 1822 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, Tipperary, Ireland. She was born in Tipperary, Ireland. She died before 1847. Generation 2 2. JAMES2 DOHERTY (Mr.1) was born in 1797 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 08 Apr 1856 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Honora O'Donnell in 1834 in Clogheen, Tipperary, Ireland (Marriage of Jacob Doherty and Honora Donnell). She was born in 1811 in Co Tipperary, Ireland. She died on 05 Jan 1888 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. James Doherty and Honora O'Donnell had the following children: 4. i. PATRICK3 DOHERTY was born on 18 Mar 1835 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, Tipperary, Ireland. He died on 06 Sep 1904 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Bridget Sullivan, daughter of Michael Sullivan and Mary Allen, on 16 Feb 1857 in Douro, Ontario, Canada (Witnesses were William Doherty and Bridget Allen).
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: the Case of Chatham-Kent
    Western Public Health Casebooks Volume 2018 2018 Article 19 2018 Case 14 : Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The aC se of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner Western University Stanley Ing Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Laura Zettler Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Gerald McKinley Western University Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/westernpublichealthcases Recommended Citation Turner, T., Ing, S., Zettler, L., McKinley, G. (2018). Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The asC e of Chatham-Kent. in: McKinley, G. & Sibbald, S.L. [eds] Western Public Health Casebook 2018. London, ON: Public Health Casebook Publishing. This Case is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Public Health Casebooks by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health CASE 14 Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The Case of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner, BSc, MPH (MPH Class of 2017) Stanley Ing, MPH, CPHI(c) (Epidemiologist, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Laura Zettler, MSc (Epidemiologist/Program Manager, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Gerald McKinley, PhD (Assistant Professor, Western University) Today’s generation is likely the first to be less healthy and die sooner than their parents’ generation (Heart & Stroke, 2017). This statement should activate the critical and analytical parts of one’s thinking to ask: “Are certain populations more affected than others?”; “What are the social, ethical, medical, and economical implications?”; and ultimately; “Why?” To evaluate a population’s health requires an understanding of the population itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Transportation Master Plan Report
    Active Transportation Master Plan Prepared by: BT Engineering Inc. 100 Craig Henry Drive, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario K2G 5W3 June 2017 County of Peterborough Active Transportation Master Plan Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Tourism ....................................................................................................... 2 Health .......................................................................................................... 3 Safety ........................................................................................................... 4 Environment ................................................................................................ 5 Study Process .............................................................................................. 6 Consultation ................................................................................................ 7 Existing Facilities ......................................................................................... 9 Paddling ..................................................................................................... 10 Generation of Alternatives ........................................................................ 11 Complete Streets ....................................................................................... 13 Policies ...................................................................................................... 14 Programs
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough County/City Paramedic Services
    CLI ENT LOGO APPENDIX I - PETERBOROUGH COUNTY/CITY PARAMEDIC SERVICES REVIEW OF EASTERN ONTARIO PARAMEDIC SERVICES “SITUATIONAL OVERVIEW” APEXPRO CONSULTING INC. NOVEMBER 2019 REVIEW OF EASTERN ONTARIO PARAMEDIC SERVICES: SITUATIONAL OVERVIEW APPENDIX I - PETERBOROUGH COUNTY/CITY PARAMEDIC SERVICES Table of Contents Preface ...................................................................................................... iii 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Service Area ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Service Profile .................................................................................... 1 1.3 Community Paramedicine Program.................................................... 3 1.4 Unique Services & Collaborations ...................................................... 4 2 Service Demand Trends .................................................................. 5 3 Response Time Performance Plan (RTPP) .................................... 7 4 CTAS Priority Distribution ............................................................... 8 5 Pickup Locations .............................................................................. 9 6 Destination Locations .................................................................... 11 7 Resource Utilization ....................................................................... 12 7.1 Time on Task ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Updating Ontario's Soil Maps
    Updating Ontario’s Soil Maps Measuring Soil Health at Different Landscape Scales Meeting Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs March 8, 2018 1 Purpose Provide an update on the status of planned soil mapping activities • Current activities and data to support mapping • Soil Mapping Efforts – Slope/topography updates – New mapping products 2 2 Initial Planned Mapping Areas Initial 2 year window of funding support from GF2 and Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) to initiate work in: Year 1 – 2016/17 • City of Ottawa area (Ottawa-Carleton) • County of Peterborough • Northeastern Ontario: Cochrane – Hearst Year 2 -2017/18 • City of Ottawa area (Ottawa-Carleton) • County of Peterborough • Upper Grand River - TBD 3 3 Pilot Soil Mapping Areas 2016-18 4 4 Supporting Data Soil map updates are data intensive: • Detailed elevation data • Extensive soil pit data and sampling 5 5 Data to Support Mapping LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) acquisition • Initial project covering 3 areas of Ontario reaching its close • Planned data capture: • leaf off conditions (fall or spring) • Develop detailed surface topography and elevation models. 6 6 Planned LiDAR Acquisition Areas • Hearst Cochran 7 7 LiDAR Specifications • Current project collects 8 elevation points per square meter • Data being collected is suitable for field-scale surveys, however, can be generalized to local and regional scale as required 8 8 LiDAR Data Availability LiDAR point clouds and DEM can be ordered from Land Information Ontario: • Limited data currently available •
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Report
    Stormwater Management Report Stormwater management report is an evaluation prepared by an experienced, qualified professional engineer to address the effects of the proposed development on the natural environment and municipal storm and sewer infrastructure. A stormwater management report provides mitigative measures to reduce the impacts of increased sediment erosion, higher and faster peak flows and pollutant containment loads on the receiving stormwater network. Our well experienced, qualified professional engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario, specializing in Stormwater Management, prepares Stormwater Management Report to support Zoning By-law Applications, Plans of Subdivision and Condominium, Consent to Sever and Site Plan Control Applications and to obtain building permits in Ontario including City of Toronto, Durham Region, Halton Region, Peel Region, York Region, Hamilton (City of Hamilton), Oshawa (City of Oshawa), Pickering (City of Pickering), Clarington (Municipality of Clarington), Ajax (Town of Ajax), Whitby (Town of Whitby), Brock (Township of Brock), Scugog (Township of Scugog), Uxbridge (Township of Uxbridge), Burlington (City of Burlington), Halton Hills (Town of Halton Hills), Milton (Town of Milton), Oakville (Town of Oakville), Brampton (City of Brampton), Mississauga (City of Mississauga), Caledon (Town of Caledon), Vaughan (City of Vaughan), Aurora (Town of Aurora), East Gwillimbury (Town of East Gwillimbury), Georgina (Town of Georgina), Markham (City of Markham), Newmarket (Town of Newmarket), Richmond Hill (City of Richmond Hill), Whitchurch-Stouffville (Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville), Bradford West Gwillimbury (Town of Bradford-West Gwillimbury), King (Township of King) and Conservation Authorities including Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Central Lake Ontario Conservation Authority, Credit Valley Conservation Authority, Conservation Halton, Lake Simcoe Region Conservation Authority, and Hamilton Conservation Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Assessment Report
    HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF THE WESTWOOD BRIDGE HAMLET OF WESTWOOD LOTS 10 & 11, CONCESSION II GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF ASPHODEL TOWNSHIP OF ASPHODEL-NORWOOD COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH, ONTARIO Submitted to: Tyler Clements HP Engineering Ottawa Submitted by: Heather Rielly MCIP RPP CAHP Ainley Group Belleville March, 2019 RequestMARCH for 2019 Proposal AINLEY FILE # 18571-1 45 South Front Street, Belleville, ON, K8N 2Y5 TEL: (613) 966-4243 EMAIL: [email protected] WWW.AINLEYGROUP.COM COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT, March 2019 For the WESTWOOD BRIDGE, Site No. 099021 - Hamlet of WESTWOOD Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Study Purpose and Method .................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Data Collection ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2. THE STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Location and Physical Context ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Historical Context ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]