DOCSLIB.ORG

Differences Between the 1991, 1986 and 1996 Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Differences Between the 1991, 1986 and 1996 Data TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 2006 VERSION 1.0 DATA GUIDE TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 2006 A Telephone Interview Survey on Household Travel Behaviour in Greater Toronto and the Surrounding Areas Conducted in the Fall of 2005 and 2006 VERSION 1.0 DATA GUIDE Prepared for the Transportation Information Steering Committee by the Data Management Group Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto October 2008 Participating Agencies: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario • City of Barrie • City of Brantford • City of Guelph City of Hamilton • City of Kawartha Lakes • City of Peterborough • City of Toronto County of Dufferin • County of Peterborough • County of Simcoe • County of Wellington GO Transit • Regional Municipality of Durham • Regional Municipality of Halton Regional Municipality of Niagara • Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of Waterloo • Regional Municipality of York Toronto Transit Commission • Town of Orangeville TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Differences Between the 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001 and 2006 Data ..............................1 2 Data Expansion ............................................................................................................4 3 Planning Districts.........................................................................................................8 4 Traffic Zones ..............................................................................................................14 5 TTS Databases............................................................................................................16 5.1 Household Attributes.....................................................................................................16 5.2 Person Attributes ...........................................................................................................19 5.3 Trip Attributes ...............................................................................................................22 5.4 Transit Attributes ..........................................................................................................25 5.4 Station Codes..................................................................................................................27 5.5 Transit Operator Codes ................................................................................................29 TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: TTS Databases Number of Records .....................................................i Exhibit 2: Interview Language 1986, 1996, 2001, 2006 ........................................3 Exhibit 3: Validation of 2006 TTS Expansion Factors (Version 0).....................5 Exhibit 4: Regions and Planning Districts.............................................................8 Exhibit 5: 2006 TTS Survey Area Planning Districts (City of Toronto) ............11 Exhibit 6: 2006 TTS Survey Area Planning Districts (Eastern Half) .................12 Exhibit 7: 2006 TTS Survey Area Planning Districts (Western Half)................13 Exhibit 8: Survey Areas Zone Numbering ............................................................14 Exhibit 9: External Area Zone Numbering...........................................................15 Exhibit 10: Household Attributes...........................................................................16 Exhibit 11: Person Attributes .................................................................................19 Exhibit 12: Trip Attributes .....................................................................................22 Exhibit 13: Transit Attributes ................................................................................25 Exhibit 14: TTC Subway Station Codes ................................................................27 Exhibit 15: GO Rail Station Codes ........................................................................28 Exhibit 16: Transit Operator Codes ......................................................................29 Exhibit 17: Transit Route Codes ............................................................................31 Exhibit 18: Household Tabulations........................................................................47 Exhibit 19: Person Tabulations ..............................................................................54 Exhibit 20: Trip Tabulations ..................................................................................70 Exhibit 21: Transit Tabulations .............................................................................86 Exhibit 22: 2006 Expanded Municipal Transit Totals .........................................99 Foreword This manual is designed to give potential users of the 1986, 1996, 2001 and 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) data an understanding of the contents of the databases maintained at the Data Management Group. Users wishing to obtain information from the databases should contact the Data Management Group or one of the following agencies: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario City of Barrie City of Brantford City of Guelph City of Hamilton City of Kawartha Lakes City of Orillia City of Peterborough City of Toronto County of Dufferin County of Peterborough County of Simcoe County County of Wellington GO Transit Regional Municipality of Durham Regional Municipality of Halton Regional Municipality of Niagara Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of Waterloo Regional Municipality of York Toronto Transit Commission Town of Orangeville Users should be aware of the differences in both the content and the areas covered by the survey in each of the four years. This guide is a compilation of information from the original data guides for the 1986 (Version 3.1), 1996 (Version 2.1), and 2001 (Version 1.0) databases with comparable information for the 2006 survey (Version 1.0). The TTS databases contain the following number of survey records: Exhibit 1: TTS Databases Number of Records 1986 (Version 3.1) 1996 (Version 2.1) 2001 (Version 1.0) 2006 (Version 1.0) Household 61,453 115,193 136,379 149,631 Person 171,086 312,781 374,182 401,653 Non Transit Trips 313,633 587,676 732,649 777,104 Transit Trips 56,615 70,295 85,095 87,244 i 2006 TTS Version 1.0 Data Guide 1 Differences Between the 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001 and 2006 Data Users of TTS data should be aware of the following differences when making comparisons between the 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001 and 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Surveys: Survey Area The 1986 survey covered the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) defined as the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto plus the Regional Municipalities of Durham, York, Peel, Halton and Hamilton. In 1991, the survey area was expanded to cover the municipalities adjacent to the GTA boundary, referred to as the ‘fringe area’. (The 1991 survey data is not included in this report.) Extending well beyond the boundaries of either of the earlier surveys, the 1996 survey includes all of the GTA plus Peterborough County (partial coverage), City of Peterborough, Victoria County, Town of Orangeville, Simcoe County (partial coverage), City of Barrie, Wellington County (partial coverage), City of Guelph, Waterloo Region and Niagara Region. A small portion of Dufferin County adjacent to the town of Orangeville is also included. Northumberland County is partially represented by interviews conducted during the training of interviewers (week 0). In 2001, changes to the survey area relative to the 1996 TTS were the inclusion of the whole of Simcoe County, the addition of the City of Orillia, and the exclusion of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Northumberland County. The 2006 survey area was expanded to include Regional Municipality of Waterloo, City of Brantford and Dufferin County. Interviews were conducted in Brant County during the training of interviewers. Minimum Age In 1986 the minimum age of persons for which trip data was collected was 6. In 1991, 1996, 2001 and 2006 the minimum age was 11. Trip data for persons aged 6 through 10 should be excluded from the 1986 survey before making comparisons with the other surveys. Bicycle Trips In 1986 information on bicycle trips was only collected for trips to or from school or work. In 1991, 1996, 2001 and 2006 information was collected for all bicycle trips. Trip Start Times In 1986, trip start times were not recorded for some school trips made by persons under the age of 14. In the other surveys, trip start time was recorded for all trips. This difference must be allowed for in making comparisons of trip start time distributions, particularly for walk, cycle, school bus and, to a lesser extent, transit trips. 1 2006 TTS Version 1.0 Data Guide Trip Purpose In 1986, shopping, entertainment and personal business trips were recorded as three separate trip purposes. In 1991, these trip purposes were included under the ‘other’ category. In 1996, 2001 and 2006, shopping was again distinguished as a separate trip purpose. In 1991, 1996, 2001 and 2006, daycare was recorded as a separate trip purpose. In 1986, trips to daycare would most likely have been included in the ‘facilitate passenger’ category. Usual Place of Work, Availability of Free Parking at Work, School Location Usual place of work, availability of free parking at work and school location were collected since 1991. In 2001 and 2006, school names were recorded and kept in the final database. Employment and Student Status In 1986 student and employment status information were collected regardless of age but were recorded as a single attribute (i.e. either employed or a student,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ELECTORAL DISTRICTS Proposal for the Province of Ontario Published
    ELECTORAL DISTRICTS Proposal for the Province of Ontario Published pursuant to the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act Table of Contents Preamble ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Process for Electoral Readjustment ................................................................................................ 3 Notice of Sittings for the Hearing of Representations .................................................................... 4 Requirements for Making Submissions During Commission Hearings ......................................... 5 Rules for Making Representations .................................................................................................. 6 Reasons for the Proposed Electoral Boundaries ............................................................................. 8 Schedule A – Electoral District Population Tables....................................................................... 31 Schedule B – Maps, Proposed Boundaries and Names of Electoral Districts .............................. 37 2 FEDERAL ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES COMMISSION FOR THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO PROPOSAL Preamble The number of electoral districts represented in the House of Commons is derived from the formula and rules set out in sections 51 and 51A of the Constitution Act, 1867. This formula takes into account changes to provincial population, as reflected in population estimates in the year of the most recent decennial census. The increase
    [Show full text]
  • Capsule Railway History of Peterborough County
    23ae Peterborough County – A Capsule Railway History BACKGROUND Before the Railway Age, travel and the movement of goods in Upper Canada were primarily dependent on wa- terways, and primitive trails that passed for roads. Needless to say, both of these modes of transportation relied very much on the weather of the seasons. Agitation for a more efficient mode of transportation had started to build with the news of the new-fangled railroad, but the economic depression of 1837 and the years following were bad years for Upper Canada and for railway development, especially in view of the unsettled economic and political conditions in England, on whose financial houses the crucial investment in railway ventures de- pended. However, in 1849 the Province of Canada passed the Railway Guarantee Act which guaranteed the interest on loans for the construction of railways not less than 75 miles in length. It was this legislation that trig- gered Canada's railway building boom. While the Grand Trunk Railway of Canada (GTR), incorporated in 1852, busied itself with its trunk line along Lake Ontario, the waterfront towns were busy with their own railway ambitions. They saw themselves as gate- ways to the untapped resources of the "hinterland". Thus emerged a pattern of "development roads" from Whit- by, Port Hope, Cobourg, Trenton, Belleville, Napanee, Kingston, Brockville and Prescott. (Toronto had already led the way with its portage road to Collingwood, and later participated in additional development roads to Owen Sound and Coboconk.) North of Lake Ontario were rich natural resources and a rapidly expanding population as successive waves of immi- grants had to seek land further north from Lake Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Department Members in Good Standing Addington Highlands Fire
    Fire Department Members in good standing Addington Highlands Fire Adelaide Metcalfe Fire Department Adjala-Tosorontio Fire Department Y Ajax Fire Y Alberton Fire Alfred & Plantagenet Y Algonquin Highlands Fire Alnwick/Haldlmand Fire Y Amherstburg Fire Department Y Arcelor-Mittal Dofasco Argyle Fire Armstrong Fire Arnprior Fire Arran Elderslie (Chelsey) Fire Arran Elderslie (Paisley) Fire Arran Elderslie (Tara) Fire Asphodel-Norwood Fire Assiginack Fire Athens Fire Y Atikokan Fire Augusta Fire Y Aviva Insurance Canada Y Aweres Fire Aylmer Fire Department Y Baldwin Fire Barrie Fire & Emergency Services Y Batchawana Bay Fire Bayfield Fire Bayham Fire & Emergency Services Y Beausoleil Fire Beckwith Twp. Fire Belleville Fire Y Biddulph-Blanshard Fire Billings & Allan Fire Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport Black River Matheson Fire Blandford - Blenheim Fire Blind River Fire Bonfield Volunteer Fire Department Bonnechere Valley Fire Department Bracebridge Fire Department Y Bradford West Gwillinbury Fire & Emergency Services Y Brampton Fire Department Y Brantford Fire Department Y Brighton District Fire Department Britt Fire Department Brock Twp. Fire Department Y Brockton Fire Department Y Brockville Fire Department Y Brooke-Alvinston District Fire Department Y Bruce Mines Bruce Mines Fire Department Y Bruce Power Brucefield Area Fire Department Brudenell, Lyndoch & Raglan Fire Department Burk's Falls & District Fire Department Y Burlington Fire Department Y Burpee & Mills Fire Department Caledon Fire & Emergency Services Y Callander Fire Department
    [Show full text]
  • CRD Guidance for Undertaking Systematic Reviews in Health Care
    CRD’s original guidance for undertaking systematic reviews was first published in 1996 and revised in 2001. The guidance is widely used, both nationally and internationally. The purpose of this third updated and expanded edition remains to provide practical guidance for undertaking systematic reviews evaluating the effects of health interventions. It presents the different stages of the process and incorporates issues specific to reviews of diagnostic and prognostic tests, public health interventions, adverse effects and economic evaluations. Recognising that health care decision-making often involves complex questions that go beyond ‘does it work’, the guidance also includes information relating to how and why an intervention works. CRD is part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and is a department of the University of York, UK. CRD was established in 1994 and undertakes systematic reviews evaluating the effects of interventions used in health and social care. ISBN 978-1-900991-19-3 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York Heslington SAMPLE York YO10 5DD United Kingdom 9 781900 991193 www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd Systematic Reviews CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care CCRDRD SSystematicystematic RReviews.inddeviews.indd 228383 88/1/09/1/09 009:29:569:29:56 © Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2008 Published by CRD, University of York January 2009 ISBN 978-1-900640-47-3 This publication presents independent guidance produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). The views expressed in this publication are those of CRD and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
    [Show full text]
  • POST-ELECTION REPORT “Ontario Election” by Knehcsg Is Licensed Under 2.0 CC BY-SA
    POST-ELECTION REPORT “Ontario Election” by knehcsg is licensed under 2.0 CC BY-SA METHODOLOGY CONTACT INFORMATION The analysis in this report is based on results of a survey conducted on In Ottawa: June 28th-30th, and July 14-16th 2018 among a sample of 3005 adults, Quito Maggi, President 18 years of age or older, living in the electoral districts of Don Valley East, [email protected] Don Valley West, Etobicoke North, Mississauga-Erin Mills, Mississauga– In Toronto: Malton, Mississauga Centre, Ottawa South, Scarborough–Guildwood, Dr. Joseph Angolano, Vice President Scarborough Centre, and Scarborough Southwest, as well as 1846 Muslims [email protected] in the province. The survey was conducted using automated telephone interviews (Smart IVR). Respondents were interviews on landlines and Find us online at: cellular phones. The survey is intended to represent the voting population • www.mainstreetresearch.ca in these ten ridings. • twitter.com/MainStResearch • facebook.com/mainstreetresearch The margin of error for the poll is +/- 1.78% at the 95% confidence level. Margins of error are higher in each subsample. The Canadian Muslim Vote: Totals may not add up 100% due to rounding. Ali Manek, Executive Director, [email protected] ABOUT MAINSTREET Hussein Allidina, Board Member, With 20 years of political experience in all three levels of government, [email protected] President and CEO Quito Maggi is a respected commentator on international public affairs. Differentiated by its large sample sizes, Mainstreet Research has provided accurate snapshots of public opinion, having predicted a majority NDP government in Alberta, and was the only polling firm to correctly predict a Liberal majority government in the 2015 federal election.
    [Show full text]
  • STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Lake Shore Boulevard West
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Lake Shore Boulevard West - Speed Limit Reduction Date: March 29, 2007 To: Etobicoke York Community Council From: Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District Wards: Ward 6 – Etobicoke-Lakeshore Reference eycc070058-to - 4757 Number: SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to reduce the speed limit on Lake Shore Boulevard West, between Mimico Creek and Palace Pier Court, from 60 km/h to 50 km/h. Given the existence of Toronto Transit Commission’s (TTC) streetcar tracks on the majority of this section of Lake Shore Boulevard West and the curved road alignment east of the F.G. Gardiner Expressway on-ramp/Brookers Lane, a lower (50 km/h) speed limit is justified and recommended. In addition, the proposed 50 km/h speed limit on Lake Shore Boulevard West between Mimico Creek and Palace Pier Court will provide for a consistent speed limit on this road in the Etobicoke York Community. RECOMMENDATIONS Transportation Services recommends that: 1. City Council approve the reduction of the speed limit on Lake Shore Boulevard West between Mimico Creek and Palace Pier Court from 60 km/h to 50 km/h. Financial Impact Type of Funding Source of Funds Amount Available within current budget Transportation Services Operating Budget $700.00 ISSUE BACKGROUND Transportation Services, in meetings with Councillor Mark Grimes and residents of the Humber Bay Shores community, have received requests to determine the appropriateness of the 60 km/h speed limit on Lake Shore Boulevard West between Mimico Creek and Palace Pier Court. A map of the area is Attachment No.
    [Show full text]
  • Postal Codes by Federal Ridings (2003 Representation Order) File (PCFRF), 2001 Census (Geography Products: Attribute Information Products), Reference Guide
    Catalogue no. 92F0193GIE Postal Codes by Federal Ridings (2003 Representation Order) File (PCFRF), 2001 Census (geography products: attribute information products), Reference guide June 2003 Statistics Statistique Canada Canada ii How to obtain more information For information on the wide range of data available from Statistics Canada, you can contact us by calling one of our toll-free numbers. You can also contact us by e-mail or by visiting our Web site. National inquiries line 1 800 263-1136 National telecommunications device for the hearing impaired 1 800 363-7629 Depository Services Program inquiries 1 800 700-1033 Fax line for Depository Services Program 1 800 889-9734 E-mail inquiries [email protected] Web site www.statcan.ca Ordering and subscription information This product, Catalogue no. 92F0193GIE, is available on Internet free. Users can obtain single issues at http:// www.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/downpub/freepub.cgi. Standards of service to the public Statistics Canada is committed to serving its clients in a prompt, reliable and courteous manner and in the official language of their choice. To this end, the Agency has developed standards of service which its employees observe in serving its clients. To obtain a copy of these service standards, please contact Statistics Canada toll free at 1 800 263-1136. Statistics Canada Postal Codes by Federal Ridings (2003 Representation Order) File (PCFRF), 2001 Census (geography products: attribute information products), Reference guide June 2003 Published by authority of the Minister responsible for Statistics Canada Minister of Industry, 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior written permission from Licence Services, Marketing Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0T6.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report
    Acknowledgments The site of Exhibition Place has had a long tradition as a gathering place. Given its location on the water, these lands would have attracted Indigenous populations before recorded history. We acknowledge that the land occupied by Exhibition Place is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Figure 1. Moccasin Identifier engraving at Toronto Trillium Park The study team would like to thank City Planning Division Study Team Exhibition Place Lynda Macdonald, Director Don Boyle, Chief Executive Officer Nasim Adab Gilles Bouchard Tamara Anson-Cartwright Catherine de Nobriga Juliana Azem Ribeiro de Almeida Mark Goss Bryan Bowen Hardat Persaud David Brutto Tony Porter Brent Fairbairn Laura Purdy Christian Giles Debbie Sanderson Kevin Lee Kelvin Seow Liz McFarland Svetlana Lavrentieva Board of Governors Melanie Melnyk Tenants, Clients and Operators Dan Nicholson James Parakh David Stonehouse Brad Sunderland Nigel Tahair Alison Torrie-Lapaire 4 - PHASE 1 PROPOSALS REPORT FOR EXHIBITION PLACE Local Advisory Committee Technical Advisory Committee Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Association Michelle Berquist - Transportation Planning The Bentway Swinzle Chauhan – Transportation Services
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Transit Service Options to Major Music Festivals
    Attachment 1 For Action Improving Transit Service to Major Music Festivals Date: May 8, 2018 To: TTC Board From: Chief Operating Officer Summary The purpose of this report is to respond to the Board’s request to report on how the TTC plans and co-ordinates service to special events, including major music festivals. Recommendations It is recommended that the Board: 1. Receive the report for information; and 2. Direct staff to forward this report to Councillor Mike Layton, City of Toronto Transportation Services, Toronto Music Advisory Council, Exhibition Place, Ontario Place and Metrolinx for information. Financial Summary This report has no financial impact. The Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information. Equity/Accessibility Matters The TTC has made significant progress in providing barrier-free, accessible transit services for all customers. Presently, all TTC bus services are operated using accessible, low-floor buses. New low-floor streetcars are currently being deployed and all routes will have accessible streetcars by 2019. All subway stations will be accessible by 2025. By providing public transit services to special events the TTC encourages and supports more spontaneous trip-making, which is an important part of making the conventional system attractive to potential new customers, such as Wheel-Trans registrants who are taking advantage of the TTC’s Family of Services, and to all travellers in Toronto. This Improving Transit Service to Major Music Festivals Page 1 of 5 supports the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) objectives of more- spontaneous travel options for customers with disabilities, and the City’s Poverty Reduction Strategy of making transit more accessible and attractive to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Census 2018 25-Wards
    Etobicoke North City of Toronto Ward Profiles Population Highlights 2016 Census 2018 25-Wards Ward Population 118,040 Population by Age Group 18% Population Growth 0-14 (2011–2016) 0.4% 15% 15% 15-24 Median Age 36.5 12% 27% 25-44 31% Population Growth (2011–2016) 26% 45-64 0.4% 27% Etobicoke North 14% 4.5% 65+ Toronto 16% Bar Chart showing the rate of population growth between the years 2006 and 2016 for the Ward compared to the City of Toronto based on the 2006 and 2016 Census data. For more information, please contact Michael Wright at 416-392-7558 or [email protected] Bar Chart of showing population by age for the Ward compared to the City of Toronto for the year 2016 based on Census data. For more information, please contact Michael Wright at 416-392-7558 or [email protected] Population Growth (2006–2016) Dependency Ratio 3.1% senior and youth dependents Etobicoke North 65.8 for every 100 working age 9.1% persons Toronto Bar Chart showing the rate of population growth between the years 2011 and 2016 for the Ward compared to the City of Toronto based on the 2011 and 2016 Census data. For more information, please contact Michael Wright at 416-392-7558 or [email protected] Density 24 people/hectare 42.3 23.6 34.2 Etobicoke North Etobicoke North 43 people/hectare 30.9 24.2 44.9 Toronto Toronto Bar Chart showing the density (the number of people per hectare) for the Ward compared to the City of Toronto in 2016 based on Census data.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the 1925-1927 Legislative Assembly of the Province
    GENERAL INDEX TO THE Journals and Sessional Papers OF THE Legislative Assembly, Ontario 1925-1926-1927 15 GEORGE V to 17 GEORGE V. Together with an Index to Debates and Speeches and List of Appendixes to the Journals for the same period. COMPILED AND EDITED BY ALEX. C. LEWIS, Clerk of the House ONTARIO TORONTO Printed and Published by the Printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty 1927 NOTE. This index is prepared for the purpose of facilitating reference to the record, in the journals of the Legislative Assembly, of any proceedings of the House at any one or more of the sessions from 1925 to 1927, inclusive. Similar indexes have been published from time to time dealing with the sessions from 1867 to 1888, from 1889 to 1900, from 1901 to 1912, from 1913 to 1920, and from 1921 to 1924, so that the publication of the present volume completes a set of indexes of the journals of the Legislature from Confederation to date. The page numbers given refer to the pages in the volume of the journals for the year indicated in the preceding bracket. An index to sessional papers, and an index to the debates and speeches for the sessions 1925 to 1927 are also in- cluded. ALEX. C. LEWIS, INDEX PAGE Index to Journals 5 Index to Sessional Papers 141 Index to Debates and Speeches 151 [4] GENERAL INDEX TO THE Journals and Sessional Papers OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE Province of Ontario FOR THE SESSIONS OF 1925, 1926 AND 1927. 15 GEORGE V TO 17 GEORGE V.
    [Show full text]