DOCSLIB.ORG

REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | Ii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | Ii THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | ii REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN PREPARED BY November December 2019 REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | iii THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | iv placeholder for ARTP adopting resolution REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | v THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK vi | REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND ASSURANCE OF NON-DISCRIMINATION The Atlanta-Region Transit Link Authority (the ATL) would like to thank the ATL Board members, its transportation partners from the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC), the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA), the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Region IV Office, and each of the transit operators, Community Improvement Districts (CIDs), and local agencies within the 13-county ATL area that participated in developing the 2019 ATL Regional Transit Plan (ARTP). Assurance of Non-Discrimination No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance (Title VI of Civil Right Act of 1964 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, and as amended, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 P.I. 100.259). This includes funds received by the ATL through the United State Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA). Further, no otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance (Rehabilitation Act of 1973 29 U.S.C. § 794). The ATL utilizes its Title VI Plan to ensure that its programs and services are conducted in a nondiscriminatory manner, without regard to race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability. For a copy of the ATL’s Title VI Plan, please visit ATL’s website at https://atltransit.ga.gov/accessibility-and-civil-rights/. The ATL is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, its services based on the qualities protected under Title VI, whether or not those programs or activities are federally funded. The Atlanta-Region Transit Link Authority 2019 Charlie Sutlive, Chairman Felicia Franklin-Warner, Vice Chair REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | i THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK ii | REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 The ATL Regional Transit Plan ........................................................................................... 11 The 2019 ARTP Development Process .............................................................................. 15 National Best Practice Review of Transit Plan and Transit Project Evaluation Methods 16 The ARTP Performance Evaluation Framework ............................................................. 18 Project Identification ........................................................................................................ 26 Project Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 29 2019 ARTP Investment Portfolio ........................................................................................ 43 Transit Revenue .............................................................................................................. 43 Plan Evaluation and Outcomes ...................................................................................... 6959 Economic Development and Land Use ....................................................................... 7161 Environmental Sustainability ....................................................................................... 7464 Equity ........................................................................................................................... 7666 Innovation .................................................................................................................... 7969 Mobility and Access ..................................................................................................... 8070 Return on Investment .................................................................................................. 8272 Stakeholder Outreach ...................................................................................................... 8777 Next Steps ......................................................................................................................... 9181 Regional Transportation Plan ...................................................................................... 9181 HB 930 Process ........................................................................................................... 9181 CIG Process ................................................................................................................ 9181 Plan Update ................................................................................................................. 9383 Appendix A: ATL Regional Transit Plan – Branding .................................................... 9787 Co-Branding ................................................................................................................ 9888 REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | i Discussions with Regional Operators ........................................................................ 10090 Appendix B: 2019 ARTP Project Evaluation Criteria and Weights ........................... 10393 Market Potential ......................................................................................................... 10393 Performance Impacts ................................................................................................ 10696 Deliverability .............................................................................................................. 10797 Cost-Effectiveness ..................................................................................................... 10898 Performance Measure Weights by Project Type ....................................................... 10999 Appendix C: 2019 ARTP Project List, by Project Sponsor ...................................... 113103 Appendix D: District Level Project Maps ................................................................... 147137 Appendix E: Project Fact Sheets ................................................................................ 171161 ii | REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN LIST OF TABLES Table 1. 2019 ARTP Project-Level Performance Evaluation Criteria ........................... 20 Table 2. 2019 ARTP Weights by Project Type and Project-Level Evaluation Criteria .. 21 Table 3. 2019 ARTP Plan-Level Performance Evaluation Metrics ............................... 24 Table 4. Quadrant 1 Results: High Impact / Low Cost Projects .................................... 35 Table 5. Quadrant 2 Results: High Impact / Higher Cost Projects ................................ 37 Table 6. Quadrant 2 Results: Lower Impact / Lower Cost Projects .............................. 39 Table 7. 2019 ARTP Summary Project List (Six-Year, Twenty-Year, and Local/Informational) ......................................................................................... 45 Table 8. Monetized Benefits of the 2019 ARTP ........................................................ 8373 Table 9. Project-Level Performance Measures and Weights .................................. 10999 Table 10. 2019 ARTP Project List ........................................................................... 114104 Table 11. Evaluation Criteria by Governing Principle ............................................. 171161 REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN | iii THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK iv | REGIONAL TRANSIT PLAN LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. ATL District Map ................................................................................................ 4 Figure 2. Current ATL Board Representatives ................................................................. 5 Figure 3. Adopted Governing Principles for the ATL Regional Transit Plan .................. 15 Figure 4. Two Evaluation Tracks within the 2019 ARTP Performance Evaluation Framework (Project Evaluation and Plan Evaluation)..................................... 17 Figure 5. Quadrant Definitions ....................................................................................... 22 Figure 6. 2019 ARTP Project Submissions, by District .................................................. 27 Figure 7. Project Submittals by Project Type ................................................................. 28 Figure 8. 2019 ARTP Projects Not Requesting Federal or State Discretionary Funding ........................................................................................................... 30 Figure 9. 2019 ARTP Projects Seeking Federal or State Discretionary Funding .......... 32 Figure 10. 2019 ARTP Projects Seeking Federal or State Discretionary Funding (Quadrant Results) .......................................................................................... 33 Figure 11. Quadrant 1 Results: High Impact / Low Cost Projects ...................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BANKHEAD STATION Transit Oriented Development
    BANKHEAD STATION Transit Oriented Development AREA PROFILE Area Demographics at 1/2 Mile Population 2012 1,902 % Population Change 2000-2012 -38% % Generation Y (18-34) 28% % Singles 83% Photo: Transformation Alliance 1335 Donald Lee Hollowell Parkway Housing Units 752 Daily Entries: 1,902 Atlanta, GA 30318 Housing Density/ Acre 1.5 Parking Capacity: 11 Spaces Bankhead Station is a heavy rail transit station facility locat- % Renters 74% ed near the geographic center of the City of Atlanta, several Parking % Multifamily Housing 49% Utilization:* N/A miles west of Midtown Atlanta on MARTA’s Green Line. Bankhead provides rapid rail service to major destinations Median Household Income $22,232 Station Type: Elevated including the Buckhead shopping and business district (23 % Use Public Transit 31% minutes), Midtown (11 minutes), Downtown (7 minutes) and Business Demographics Total Land Area +/- 3 acres Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport (23 minutes). Employees 234 Weekly Daily Entries MARTA’s adopted Transit Oriented Development Guidelines Avg. Office Rent Per SF $9.51 1,902 1,907 classify Bankhead as a Town Center station. This classifica- Avg. Retail Rent Per SF N/A tion system reflects both a station’s location and its primary Avg. Apartment Rent (1-mile) $520 function. The Guidelines define two types of Town Center 1,834 stations, one in “…historic town centers, such as Decatur or East Point”, the other as “…focal points for new town center- Sources: Bleakly Advisory Group, 2012. TOD nodes planned and built from the ground up in re- FY13 FY14 FY15 sponse to twenty-first century transit opportunities”. Bank- head station will likely be the latter, particularly with its proximity to the Atlanta BeltLine and the Bellwood Quarry MARTA Research & Analysis 2016 which is planned to be developed into the Westside Reser- *Data is not gathered if below 100 voir Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT
    Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT Estimated Capital Cost (Base Year in Estimated O&M Cost (Base Year in Millions) Millions) Project Description Total Miles Local Federal O&M Cost Over 20 Total Capital Cost Annual O&M Cost Share Share Years Two (2) miles of heavy rail transit (HRT) from HE Holmes station to a I‐20 West Heavy Rail Transit 2 $250.0 $250.0 $500.0 $13.0 $312.0 new station at MLK Jr Dr and I‐285 Seven (7) miles of BRT from the Atlanta Metropolitan State College Northside Drive Bus Rapid Transit (south of I‐20) to a new regional bus system transfer point at I‐75 7 $40.0 N/A $40.0 $7.0 $168.0 north Clifton Light Rail Four (4) miles of grade separated light rail transit (LRT) service from 4 $600.0 $600.0 $1,200.0 $10.0 $240.0 Contingent Multi‐ Transit* Lindbergh station to a new station at Emory Rollins Jurisdicitional Projects I‐20 East Bus Rapid Three (3) miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) service from Five Points to 3 $28.0 $12.0 $40.0 $3.0 $72.0 Transit* Moreland Ave with two (2) new stops and one new station Atlanta BeltLine Twenty‐two (22) miles of bi‐directional at‐grade light rail transit (LRT) 22 $830 $830 $1,660 $44.0 $1,056.0 Central Loop service along the Atlanta BeltLine corridor Over three (3) miles of bi‐directional in‐street running light rail transit Irwin – AUC Line (LRT) service along Fair St/MLK Jr Dr/Luckie St/Auburn 3.4 $153 $153 $306.00 $7.0 $168.0 Ave/Edgewood Ave/Irwin St Over two (2) miles of in‐street bi‐directional running light rail transit Downtown – Capitol
    [Show full text]
  • MARTA Tunnel Construction in Decatur, Georgia
    . 4 I lit. 18.5 . a37 no UOT- f SC- UM TM UMTA-MA-06-002 5-77-1 7 7 -2 4 T NO MARTA TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION IN DECATUR GEORGIA— A Case Study of Impacts Peter C. Wolff and Peter H. Scholnick Abt Associates Inc. 55 Wheeler Street Cambridge MA 02138 of TR4 A( JULY 1977 FINAL REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE U.S. PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U.S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION Office of Technology Development and Deployment Office of Rail Technology Washi ngton DC 20591 . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1 . Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. UMTA-MA-06-0025- 77-14 4. Title and Subti tie 5. Report Date July 1977 iJfYlTfl- MARTA TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION IN DECATUR GEORGIA— A Case Study of Impacts 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing, Organi zation Report No. 7. Authors) DOT-TSC-UMTA-77-24 AAI 77-18 Peter Co Wolff and Peter H. Scholnick 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Abt Associates Inc. UM704/R7706 55 Wheeler Street 11. Contract or Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Decatur's Transportation Network, 2007
    3 • Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 CHAPTER • 3 Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 othing speaks louder of a city’s transportation system than how its residents use it. A public survey conducted as part of the CTP revealed that sixty-seven N percent of commuters drive alone to get to work or school. Over 20 percent of commuters in Decatur either walk, bike or take transit. Even more interesting, 79 percent of residents reported having walked or ridden a bike to downtown Decatur. Additionally, the majority of residents feel that it is easy to get around the City. These results indicate a system that already provides a lot of choice for travelers. The following sections detail the extent of these choices, i.e. the facilities that make up the existing Decatur transportation network. The CTP uses this snapshot of how Decatur gets around in 2007 to recommend how the City can build upon its existing strengths to realize its vision of a healthy and well-connected community. Existing Street Network Streets are where it all comes together for travel in and through Decatur. The streets and their edges provide places for people to walk, bicycle and travel in buses and other vehicles. Compared with the MARTA rail system and off-road paths and greenways, the street system in Decatur accommodates the majority of travel and is detailed below. Roadway Classification in Decatur In 1974, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the manual Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and forms the basis of this roadway classification inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation Alliance
    The TransFormation Alliance Strengthening Communities Through Transit The TransFormation Alliance is a diverse collaboration of organizations including, community advocates, policy experts, transit providers, and government agencies working toward a common goal to change how transit and community development investments shape the future, to offer all residents the opportunities for a high quality of life, linked by our region’s critically important transit system. Issues Driven People and Creative Placemaking Housing Choice and Transit Innovative Capital Equitable TOD Climate and Job Access Health Why It Matters Housing Cost Jobs Access 48% The percentage of income paid in 3.4% rent by City of Atlanta HH of jobs are accessible by a earning the lowest 20th 45 minute trip on transit. percentile. - Brookings Institute, 2016 Income Mobility 4% A child raised in the bottom fifth income bracket in Atlanta has just 4% chance of reaching the top fifth - Brookings Institute, 2016 MARTA links disparate communities The five highest median The five lowest median household incomes by MARTA household incomes by MARTA stop stop 1) Buckhead Station: 1) West End Station: $19,447 $104,518 2) Ashby Station: $21,895 2) Brookhaven-Oglethorpe 3) Oakland City Station: Station: $104,168 $23,000 3) East Lake Station: $97,037 4) Lakewood-Ft. McPherson 4) Lenox Station: $90, 766 Station: $25,236 5) Medical Center Station: 5) Bankhead Station: $26,168 $89,281 Station Area Typology Type A: • In/near major job centers • Improve job access Low Vulnerability + • Affluent
    [Show full text]
  • MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta
    MARTA Jurisdictional Briefing City of Atlanta October 10, 2018 Jeffrey A. Parker | General Manager/CEO PRESENTATION OVERVIEW • More MARTA Atlanta Program / Approved Plan • State of Service • Ongoing Coordination Issues • Q & A 2 MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM / APPROVED PLAN MORE MARTA ATLANTA PROGRAM • Unanimous Approval by MARTA Board of Directors • $2.7 billion in sales tax over 40 years • Additional public/private funding to be sought • Targeted Investments: 22 Miles - Light Rail Transit (LRT) 14 Miles - Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 26 Miles - Arterial Rapid Transit (ART) 2 New Transit Centers Additional Fixed-Route Bus Service Upgrades to existing Rail Stations • Two Years of Comprehensive Planning and Outreach • Nine Guiding Principles • Opportunities for more transit 4 THE PEOPLE’S PRIORITIES Based on public feedback, MARTA and City leaders refined the program, with emphasis on: Atlanta BeltLine Southeast/Southwest Station Enhancements $570M $600M+ $200M Plan builds out 61% of City‐adopted Includes LRT on Campbellton & SW Includes better access, amenities Atlanta BeltLine Streetcar Plan BeltLine and BRT link to downtown and ADA enhancements Clifton Corridor Downtown/Streetcar Bus System $250M $553M $238M Plus additional $100M contingent Connects BeltLine with downtown Includes more frequent bus on securing other local funding destinations and existing Streetcar service and new circulator routes 5 APPROVED PROGRAM 6 MORE MARTA Program MORE MARTA IMPLEMENTATION TO DATE • MARTA has already responded to public feedback. Since 2017, the
    [Show full text]
  • Dekalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019
    DeKalb County Transit Master Plan Final Report - August 2019 Prepared for Prepared by 1355 Peachtree St. NE Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30309 What is DeKalb County’s Transit Master Plan? The Transit Master Plan’s purpose is to address DeKalb County’s mobility challenges, help to enhance future development opportunities, and improve the quality of life within each of DeKalb County’s cities and unincorporated communities, both north and south. The plan identifies transit service enhancements for today and expansion opportunities for tomorrow to create a 30-year, cost-feasible vision for transit investments in DeKalb County Table of Contents Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Project Goals ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 State of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................. 2-1 History of DeKalb Transit ................................................................................................... 2-1 DeKalb Transit Today .......................................................................................................... 2-2 Current Unmet Rider Needs ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit Contract and Assistance Agreement and Amendments
    RAPID TRANSIT CONTRACT AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENTS Amendment Effective Date Description 1 December 21, 1973 Relocation of Vine City Station, addition of Techwood Station, and changing Tucker-North DeKalb Busway to rapid rail line 2 April 15, 1974 Consolidation of Piedmont Road and Lindbergh Drive Stations into one station 3 August 21,1974 Relocation of Northside Drive Station 4 October 10, 1978 Addition of Airport Station 5 September 1, 1979 Construction Priorities mandated by Legislation 6 May 27, 1980 Permits extension of System into Clayton County and waives “catch-up” payments 7 October 1, 1980 Relocation of Fairburn Road Station 8 June 1, 1983 Construction Priorities 9 May 11, 1987 Realignment of East Line between Avondale Yard and Kensington Station, deletion of North Atlanta busway and addition of North Line, and modification of Proctor Creek Line 10 March 14, 1988 Relocation of Doraville Station 11 August 29, 1990 Extension of the Northeast Line to and within Gwinnett County 12 April 24, 2007 Extended sales tax through June 30, 2047 and added West Line BRT Corridor, I-20 East BRT Corridor, Beltline Rail Corridor and Clifton Corridor rail segment 13 November 5, 2008 Amended I-20 East Corridor from BRT to fixed guideway; added Atlanta Circulation Network; extended fixed guideway segment north along Marietta Blvd; extended the North Line to Windward Parkway; added a fixed guideway segment along the Northern I-285 Corridor in Fulton and DeKalb Counties; extended the Northeast Line to the DeKalb County Line 14 December
    [Show full text]
  • Hollowell/M.L. King Redevelopment Plan and Tax Allocation District
    Hollowell/M.L. King Redevelopment Plan and Tax Allocation District City of Atlanta TAD #8 Prepared by Atlanta Development Authority for City of Atlanta Georgia October 2006 City of Atlanta TAD#8: Hollowell/M.L. King Redevelopment Plan and Tax Allocation District Hollowell/M.L. King Redevelopment Plan & Tax Allocation District Contents NOTE: Headings followed by a (n) denote information required per Georgia Code Title 36, Chapter 44. A. Executive Summary 4 The Vision for Hollowell/M.L. King and Key Objectives of the Hollowell/M.L. King TAD 4 TAD Goals and Objectives 5 Location and Boundaries of Hollowell/M.L. King Tax Allocation District (TAD) 6 Overview of Tax Allocation Districts 12 Legal Basis and Qualifying Conditions for the Hollowell/M.L. King Redevelopment Plan 12 Concept Plan: Activity Nodes 16 Private Redevelopment Program 24 Public Redevelopment/Improvement Projects 25 Financing Potential of the Hollowell/M.L. King TAD 26 Summary Conclusion 27 B. TAD Purpose, Objectives and Boundaries (A) 29 The Vision for Hollowell/M.L. King and Key Objectives of the Hollowell/M.L. King TAD 29 Location and Boundaries of TAD 31 Overview of Tax Allocation Districts 39 C. Key Findings within the Redevelopment Area (B) 40 Legal Basis and Qualifying Conditions for the Hollowell/M.L. King Redevelopment Plan 40 History and Neighborhoods 42 Qualifying Criteria 43 Page 1 City of Atlanta TAD#8: Hollowell/M.L. King Redevelopment Plan and Tax Allocation District Key Findings of Property Conditions within the Hollowell/M.L. King TAD 47 Demographic Findings, Market Conditions and Market Trends 56 D.
    [Show full text]
  • System Map a R 14Th St G D Id S
    CUMMING HWY 143 W W IN IN D D W A W KY R A P D R D D AR P P WINDW KY KY KY DWARD P WIN 185 Windward Park & Ride 141 CUMMING HWY MAYFIELD RD N MAIN ST 141 143 W 143 W IN IN D D W A W KY R A P D R D D AR P P WINDW KY KY KY DWARD P 140 WIN ACADEMY ST 185 GA-400 141 Windward Park & Ride MAYFIELD RD N MAIN ST 141 OLD MILTO N PKY 143 OLD 140 M ACADEMY ST GA-400 ILTON PKY OLD MILTO N PKY 185 OLD M S MAIN ST ILTON PKY H A 185 Y O S MAIN ST L H N D A M Y OL E I N D M North Fulton Hospital LT North Fulton Hospital E ILT S O S ON N B PK B P R Y K ID R Y G I E D ALPHARETTA HWY R G D E STATE BRIDGE RD ALPHARETTA HWY R 185 D STATE BRIDGE RD 185 GA-400 140 E GA-400 CR MANSELL RD North Point Mall OS 140 SV ILL ALPHARETTA HWY E R D Mansell Park & Ride WOODSTOCK RD MANSELL RD H O L 141 T C S OM TA B ET B AR RI H DG E LP E GA-400 A R 140 CR MANSELL RD North Point Mall D 143 OS CANTON ST S M V A IL ALPHARETTA HWY GN L OLIA ST HO E LCOM R T B B S RID D GE R 85 A D Mansell Park & Ride T N A MANSELL RD L WOODSTOCK RD T A HO H L CO O M B 141 MARIETTA HWY L B RIVERSIDE RD R C ATLA ID T O S N G S TA E M S R A T D TT B E B EA DR AR RI AZAL H DG LP E GA-400 A R 140 D 143 CANTON ST ROSWELL RD GA-400 M D A u G nw N oo O ST H 87 d LIA O y P LCOM L T B B S RID GE R 85 A D 85 T N A IDGE RD L NORTHR T A HO PITTS RD LC R O G D M DIN DUNWOODY CLUB DR AL B SP MARIETTA HWY B RIVERSIDE RD R ROBERTS DR L ID S AT AN G T E A ST R 87 D R D G IN 85 LD AZALEA DR SPA RD FERRY JETT D DALRYMPLE R D LE R D ALRYMP 143 D R NON 87 141 VER 140 MT 185 RD NON MT VER Georgia Perimeter College
    [Show full text]
  • Served Proposed Station(S)
    CURRENT PROPOSED ROUTE NAME JURISDICTION PROPOSED MODIFICATION STATION(S) STATION(S) SERVED SERVED Discontinue Service -N ew proposed Routes 21 and 99 would provide service along Jesse Hill Ave., Coca Cola Pl. and Piedmont Ave. segments. New proposed Route 99 would provide service along the Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr. segment. New proposed Routes 32 and 51 would provide service on Marietta St. between Forsyth St. and Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. New proposed Route 12 would provide service on the Howell Mill Rd segment between 10th St. and Marietta Chattahoochee Ave.. New proposed Route 37 would provide service on Chattahoochee Ave. between Hills Ave. and Marietta Blvd and Marietta Blvd City of Atlanta, 1 Boulevard/Centennial between Bolton Dr. and Coronet Way. New proposed Routes 37 and 60 would provide service on Coronet Way between Marietta Blvd and Bolton Rd Georgia State Fulton County Olympic Park segments. Service will no longer be provided on Edgewood Ave. between Piedmont Ave. and Marietta St.; Marietta St. between Edgewood Ave. and Forsyth St.; Marietta St. between Ivan Allen, Jr. Blvd and Howell Mill Rd; Howell Mill Rd between Marietta St. and 10th St.; Huff Rd, Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Marietta Blvd; Chattahoochee Ave. between Ellsworth Industrial Blvd and Hill Ave.; Bolton Pl., Bolton Dr.; Coronet Way between Defoors Ferry Rd and Moores Mill Rd, and Moores Mill Rd between Bolton Rd and Coronet Way. Proposed modification includes Route 2 operate from Inman Park station via Moreland Ave. (currently served by Route 6-Emory) Freedom Parkway and North Avenue, North Avenue City of Atlanta, 2 Ponce De Leon Avenue Ralph McGill Blvd (currently served by Route 16-Noble), continuing via Blvd,and North Ave.
    [Show full text]