Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

ONLINE AUCTION FRAUD AND EBAY RONALD J. BAUERLY, Western Illinois University

EBay claims that users face only a 1 in 10,000 risk of fraud. Evidence from the FBI shows the rate is more like 1 in 100, or one hundred times greater than the company alleges. Despite the usefulness of eBay’s feedback mechanism buyers still face substantial risk of being defrauded. This paper details the level and dimension of online fraud, examines the history of fraud on eBay, followed by a discussion of feedback and its attendant limitations. EBay’s new feedback policies and other fraud reduction efforts are then evaluated. Finally, fraud reduction recommendations are provided for all three auction participant groups: buyers, sellers, and eBay itself. Managing and minimizing online auction fraud is a challenge all three groups must meet. Trust is the antithesis of fraud and achieving trust requires an understanding and appreciation of the actions each participant group must make.

INTRODUCTION Until recently eBay appeared to be unconcerned about fraud. EBay has won legal cases which Fraud is a persistent problem for online auction confirm the fact that they are acting only as a participants, particularly for buyers. EBay venue for auctions (Mangalindan and dominates the online auction world with 100 O‟Connell 2008). This means the seller must be million items on sale (Consumer Reports 2007, held legally responsible for fraud. According to 12). While eBay claims fraud occurs in only 1 the Wall Street Journal, recent reductions in in 10,000 of its auctions, a 2007 Consumer auction growth have impacted eBay Reports Study found almost half of eBay (Mangalindan 2007). Despite revenue growth buyers encountered deceptions. According to of 26 percent in the most recent quarter, eBay the FBI, the actual fraud rate for online auctions experienced a six percent decrease in listings is more like one percent or 100 times the (p. B2). While eBay boasts over 240 million number eBay reports. One reason eBay‟s registered users worldwide, only a third of them reported fraud rate is so low is because it counts (83 million) are active users. As growth has auctions where fraud is claimed. Also, many slowed, eBay‟s response has been to modify a auctions are of low value, averaging under $25 number of dimensions in site architecture, per item, thus, many defrauded buyers consider bidder options, and to add a variety of it not worth the trouble to pursue a claim. Of restrictions on its sellers (Mangalindan 2007). course there are many non-auction transactions Furthermore, eBay claims to have “2,000 staff and the fraud problem is very significant. members policing its site around the clock” Gavish and Tucci (2006) cite a VeriSign study (Consumer Reports 2007). Reducing fraud has (2003) that reports 6.25 percent of e-commerce been a longstanding eBay concern but now transactions in the U.S. were attempts at fraud. appears to have a new urgency. The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) reports it has received its one millionth Fraud will always threaten online auction complaint about online crime (IC3 2007). participants. While auction venue providers can While this paper focuses on online auction increase safety, buyers and sellers must also fraud, a very high threat of general online crime work to manage their risk of experiencing exists for both buyers and sellers. fraud. Since eBay and buyer/seller participants

The Marketing Management Journal act as a type of social entity it is useful to detail Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 134-144 the actions each group can undertake to reduce Copyright © 2009, The Marketing Management Association All rights of reproduction in any form reserved fraud. The paper concludes with

133 Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

recommendations for each participant group on fraudulent sellers operate with seeming how to reduce their likelihood of experiencing impunity. Comments are an important means of fraud. examining underlying trust issues. Research has shown that some buyers are misled by The Level of Online Fraud exaggerated claims of quality (Jin and Kato 2006). As a consequence, textual feedback According to the Federal Trade Commission comments are useful in spotting this deception. (FTC), complaints about online fraud are always near the top of the list of complaints Maintaining a consistent aggressive stance received each year (FTC 2006), with nearly 45 against bad sellers should serve eBay‟s percent of all complaints coming from Internet interests. According to Mangalindan, “eBay auction fraud (Internet Fraud Crime Report restricts the selling privileges of lower-rated 2006). The average loss reported was $602.50 sellers or cuts them off entirely” (2007, B1). per auction complaint. The most common eBay has also added more detailed seller ratings complaints concern late shipments, no about such things as timeliness of delivery and shipments, or shipments of products that are not how closely the products matched their the same quality as advertised. Recent descriptions. Mangalindan reports that EBay empirical evidence suggests that the FBI itself says “that 1 percent of sellers are estimate that one percent of online Trades are responsible for 35 percent of the negative fraudulent is actually optimistic. Based upon a buying experiences on the site.” If this is true, study of 1,200 respondents, Gavish and Tucci then one might expect a more rigorous rooting (2006) provide evidence that fraud levels are out of these bad sellers. probably twice the FBI estimate. Many online buyers continue to avoid online purchases due An insidious form of fraud is shill bidding. This to mistrust even with non-auction sellers. takes place when a seller bids on his or her own Online fraud is perpetrated far too often and is item. This practice is well known but difficult clearly a particular threat with online auctions. to detect. Since the victim has no knowledge of who is bidding they perceive the shill bids as History of Fraud and EBay real and escalate their bids accordingly. Nikitkov and Bay (2008) found the level of EBay has long represented its online auction shill bidding alone probably exceeds 15 venue as very safe and nearly free of fraud. percent. Also, since shill bidding is often not However, the eBay user agreement specifies detected, it is only infrequently reported to that they “have no control over the quality, eBay. Arguably, this form of deception might safety or legality of items advertised, the truth be more common than all the other forms of or accuracy of the listings, the ability of sellers fraud such as non-delivery, misdescription, and to sell items or the ability of buyers to pay for counterfeiting. items. We cannot ensure that a buyer or seller will actually complete a transaction.” (eBay Competing auction venues such as Amazon User Agreement 2008). EBay details a list of have long required sellers to provide a credit prohibited practices covering a myriad of issues card in order to list, while it took eBay several and circumstance. Nevertheless, those who more years to begin (FinancialWire 2007). This have brought suits against eBay have lost on the requirement is considered basic to limiting basis of eBay‟s disclaimer. In all fairness, eBay seller fraud. Originally, eBay provided users probably couldn‟t operate without this with a hypertext link to report fraud to the protection. But, without efforts to combat fraud, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) but since has eBay‟s vaunted auction world would become removed that link (Guth, et al. 2007). As a unraveled. Feedback is the basic underpinning consequence, online auction fraud reported to of trust and continues to be a valuable ally of the FTC dropped significantly. By removing both buyer and seller. Despite this, many the link, eBay reduced reported fraud, but this

Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 134 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

doesn‟t mean actual fraud dropped. It was sellers for resolution (which eBay another indication that eBay was less than fully recommends), only 38 percent were successful. committed to combating fraud. According to the study, the best way to deal with dishonesty is to report it to PayPal (owned Legally, the company has successfully by eBay). While only 23 percent of unhappy defended many court challenges. Despite losing respondents took their complaint to PayPal, 66 a recent French counterfeit case, eBay just won percent of those who did so were successful a U.S. counterfeit case against Tiffany & Co. (Mangalindan 2007). (Metz 2008). The court ruled that eBay “can‟t be held liable for trademark infringement based EBay has developed a couple of options to help solely on their generalized knowledge that protect buyers as long as they use PayPal for trademark infringement might be occurring on their purchases. The first option is the dispute their Web sites” (Metz 2008, p.1). Rob Resolution Center of PayPal. You may pursue Chesnut, senior VP and legal counsel at eBay this option if you did not receive the item or if said, “This ruling appropriately established that the item was “significantly different than what protecting trademarks is the primary burden of was described in the listing or „Significantly not rights owners – not marketplaces like eBay” as Described‟ (SNAD)” (eBay 2008a).” EBay (Mangalindan and O‟Connell 2008, B1). defines SNAD with illustrative examples such Consequently, we can expect eBay to maintain as the item is completely different from its a relatively low profile on fraud cases. Limited description. A second example: you receive a resources are more likely to be deployed to picture of an item rather than the item itself. A maintain revenue growth. Any corrective third example is the item is in poor condition measures taken will follow along previous eBay when it was described as “mint in box.” Other positions. To do much more would be examples include receiving fake or knockoffs expensive and could open eBay up to or items were missing. PayPal will then help unacceptable levels of liability. the buyer and seller to resolve the issue. Alternatively, PayPal provides insurance The next section discusses the history of eBay‟s against fraud of from $200 to $2000 provided responses to fraud. The following two sections the buyer purchased the item through a address eBay‟s current feedback framework qualified seller (eBay 2008a). and the new feedback rules and seller requirements that became effective in 2008. Another helpful option for buyers who were not The last sections provide detailed fraud satisfied has been to use eBay‟s Trust & Safety reduction recommendations for auction Discussion Board (eBay 2008b). Many buyers participants. say using this discussion board provides a place to vent, as well as helpful advice you will never EBay’s Historical Fraud Response get from eBay or PayPal concerning dispute resolutions. The many thousands of indexed Tod Marks (Mangalindan 2007) reports that buyer postings provide a useful set of answers eBay has 2,000 employees policing its site, but and attest to the board‟s attraction. with 6.4 million new listings per day, can‟t instantly shut down every questionable auction. FEEDBACK: A fair reporting of buyers‟ experiences shows THE FOUNDATION OF TRUST most are satisfied. According to a recent Consumer Report’s study 70 percent of eBay Trust is necessary in an online auction buyers were highly satisfied overall marketplace and eBay built its business on (Mangalindan 2007). Yet 40 percent of survey trust. Trust can be defined as “the subjective respondents believed eBay‟s help and customer assessment of one party that another will support was either fair or poor. Furthermore, perform a particular transaction according to his when victims of fraud went directly to the or her confident expectations, in an

135 Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

environment characterized by uncertainty,” (Ba The list below summarizes some of the reasons and Pavlou 2002, p.243). Trust is a critical why feedback has been less than a complete dimension because buyers typically don‟t know solution when it comes to trust. the seller‟s reputation and trustworthiness. EBay strongly encourages both buyers and Reasons Why Feedback Doesn’t Work as sellers to rely on feedback as a proxy for trust. Intended *

Experimental evidence supports the proposition 1. Buyers often don‟t know they have been that superior feedback can increase auction defrauded. prices achieved (i.e., Dewally and Ederington 2. Buyers are reluctant to give negative 2006; Jin and Kato 2006; Lucking-Reiley 1999; feedback fearing retaliatory negative Lucking-Reiley, et al.; 2007, Resnick, et al.; feedback. 2006). When buyers‟ perceptions of risk are 3. Sellers are not removed even for large reduced a price premium is gained. There is numbers of negative feedback. support for the assertion that negative feedback 4. Negative feedback provides an insufficient has a greater impact on prices realized than basis for informed judgment. positive feedback. When there is buyer doubt as 5. Sellers can masquerade as an honest one. to the quality of an item then feedback has an 6. Sellers create “shill” feedbacks to build even stronger influence on price premiums. fraudulent positive profiles (Kirsner 2003). Therefore, both buyers and sellers have a strong 7. A seller can leave eBay and quickly return motive for providing positive and avoiding under a different identity. negative feedback. *List from Bauerly and Singh (2004).

When it comes to actual action items, the seller Despite these limitations, much information can is the only one who truly knows whether an be gleaned from the text comments. According item is genuine and accurately described. As a to a study of text comments, the nature and result, there is often a significant difference in quality of text comments can have a significant the knowledge level between buyers and impact on price differentials in eBay auctions sellers. This phenomenon is referred to as (Pavlou and Dimoka 2006). Amazon.com, from information asymmetry. In a normal auction its inception, provided a feedback system in setting the item can be physically inspected to which only the buyers provide feedback. reduce the information asymmetry. In an online Experimental evidence has shown that this auction this option is not available. system provides more trustworthy information Consequently, for the buyer, feedback is one of for buyers (Chwelos and Dhar 2007). the few proxies for establishing trust. Historically, EBay‟s feedback system Interestingly, research shows that most sellers motivated buyers and sellers to engage in a do not use buyer reputation ratings (Dholakia conspiracy of positivity while Amazon buyers 2005). Feedback acts as a form of word of can be completely honest without fear of mouth but provided by anonymous parties. retaliation. Chwelos and Dhar (2007) found Unfortunately, eBay‟s feedback mechanism has that when eBay buyers have a negative a history of problems. Survey evidence shows experience they still either provide mild that a substantial proportion of eBay users have positive feedback or no feedback at all. Based received retaliatory feedback (19 percent) and upon direct seller comparisons on the two sites, been victims of feedback extortion (16 percent) the authors found positive seller ratings on within the last six months (Steiner 2003). eBay had little impact on prices or sales levels Furthermore, evidence shows only about 60 while positive seller feedback on Amazon had percent of sellers provide feedback to buyers significant impact on perceived reputation and (Chwelos and Dhar 2007). prices obtained (Chwelos and Dhar 2007). Because of the limitations of the current

Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 136 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

bilateral feedback system, eBay has unveiled a The first element is a common-sense change. new feedback policy. The next section details Trading partners clearly shouldn‟t be counted the new feedback policy and evaluates its only once (ever). This had the unintended effect impact on buyers and sellers. of trivializing repeat customers. The fear in the original feedback system was that a small EBAY’S NEW FEEDBACK POLICY number of customers could artificially inflate feedback scores. Element two is the most In early 2008, eBay announced new fee important change to the feedback system as it increases, increased seller standards, and a new eliminates sellers from giving negative or feedback policy (eBay 2008c). According to neutral feedback. Buyers will no longer fear new eBay CEO John Donahoe, the increased retaliatory negative feedback from sellers. seller standards combined with the new EBay indicates eliminating buyer fear of feedback policies are designed to increase retaliatory feedback was the reason for this big buyer safety and satisfaction (Holahan 2008). change. The other changes have less impact There are five key elements to the new than element two but are meaningful. Buyers Feedback system being introduced in the first must wait three days before leaving negative or half of 2008 (quoted from eBay 2008c): neutral feedback for sellers with an established 1. Beginning in February, buyers and sellers feedback. This should help protect against will be able to earn up to one Feedback per buyers engaging in bad “knee-jerk” feedback. week from the same trading partner. Today, The shortening of the allowable feedback members may only affect each other‟s period is not unreasonable. Feedback scores one time, regardless of the number of transactions between the parties. In summary, the feedback changes offer mostly This change will both encourage repeat improvements for buyers‟ safety. The transactions and reward good service. Amazon.com study shows (Chwelos and Dhar 2. Sellers will no longer be able to leave 2007) the superiority of a unilateral feedback negative or neutral Feedback for buyers. system. EBay has created a hybrid system This change occurred in May, 2008. protecting buyers but still allowing sellers to 3. Removal of negative and neutral Feedback provide positive feedback. This not only makes left by members who are suspended or who eBay‟s feedback distinctive from Amazon‟s but fail to respond to the Unpaid Item Process arguably superior. While the feedback changes (UPI). do eliminate one of the most troubling 4. Positive Feedback percentage will be based limitations identified by Bauerly and Singh on the past 12 months of Feed back, rather (2004), retaliatory feedback, most of the others than lifetime, since it is most indicative of remain. While eBay asserts the feedback the seller's recent performance. changes benefit both buyers and sellers, sellers 5. Restrictions on when Feedback can be left: have been negative in their reactions (Stewart a. Buyers must wait three days before 2008). Sellers perceive losing the option of leaving negative or neutral Feedback giving negative feedback as an invitation for for sellers with an established track buyer misbehavior. Buyers could blackmail record. sellers into unreasonable concessions in order b. Instead of 90 days, members will be to avoid negative feedback. EBay has made able to leave Feedback for 60 days. provisions for addressing unacceptable buyer c. Buyers will now be able to revise behavior, but sellers are wary of the newly feedback left for sellers. Previously, all empowered buyers. The changes took effect in feedback was permanent though May, 2008. participants could later add comments. (eBay 2008 d). EBay has made a number of changes which impact sellers. Under the new terms for Power Sellers, sellers who maintain high average item

137 Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

and revenue levels, Detailed Seller Ratings FRAUD REDUCTION (DSRs), will have to be maintained at a high RECOMMENDATIONS level (4.5 out of 5). The DSRs are rated on a five star scale with 5 being highest across four All three auction participants have a role to play categories (communication; shipping time; and in reducing online auction fraud. Buyers want shipping and handling charges). DSRs were to avoid being defrauded; honest sellers want to supposed to improve buyer knowledge and prevent negative outcomes for buyers some of encourage sellers to focus on improvements in which may unintentionally constitute fraud. these four areas. EBay will also reduce fees EBay itself must also work harder to minimize paid on items sold (by 5 percent or by 15 fraud. The following sections provide percent) for power sellers who maintain high recommendations for reducing online auction (4.6 out of 5) or very high (4.8 out of 5) levels fraud for the various participants. Since getting of DSRs respectively. Sellers have voiced their buyers to trust is a key managerial goal for disapproval of new seller requirements for sellers, then understanding how buyers can Power Sellers (Zouhali-Worrall 2008). achieve trust is a relevant and instructive consideration. Frustration over the monopolistic tendencies of eBay is apparent from both buyers and sellers. Recommendations for Buyers This frustration is evident as reflected in the thousands of postings on eBay‟s discussion Buyers need to arm themselves with knowledge board and other user developed sites. Sellers that will not only help them get a good deal but have a number of longstanding complaints reduce the chances they will be defrauded. against the imperious nature of eBay‟s relationships with its sellers. The call for a 1. Examine not only seller feedback ratings strike against eBay February 18-25, 2008 was a (insist on a level of 99 percent positive), reflection of the mounting dissatisfaction sellers but also the detailed comments. Often, the have with eBay. Some sellers have begun to comments both from buyers and seller switch to alternative auction sites such as responses can provide relevant content. OnlineAuction.com and eCrater (Chu 2008). Avoid sellers whose comments berate While alternative auction venues may be buyers who complain. attractive, even Amazon.com has been unable 2. Be wary of sellers who have recent to attract the enormous level of buyers and negative feedback. According to Gregg sellers that eBay commands. and Scot (2006), this information usefully predicts future negative outcomes from As an auction venue EBay straddles a line these sellers. between sellers and buyers that can be most 3. Don‟t pay with cash, money order, or contentious. The safety of online auctions is personal check. Sellers who want to paramount in the eyes of buyers. John defraud know there is little recourse for Donahoe has vowed to make eBay a safer and the buyer when they pay by cash. So more satisfying experience for buyers (Holahan beware of sellers who do not allow 2008). Since the announcement of the changes payment via PayPal or credit card. While in feedback and seller requirements eBay has these sellers may just want to avoid paying been deluged by sellers with mostly negative credit card fees, buyers who pay by cash reactions. Buyers are mostly positive about the methods are the most frequently defrauded feedback changes. The feedback changes (Snyder 2000). should eliminate the fear of retaliatory 4. Carefully read and understand seller‟s feedback, and enhanced seller requirements descriptions of the item and costs/terms of should lead to improved buyer satisfaction. shipping. 5. Remember that most winners are cursed: You have just paid more than any other

Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 138 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

interested party was willing to pay, thus, 10. Consider consulting an online trading you probably paid more than the item was community for more information. There worth. Expert behavioral economist are eBay communities as well as Richard Thaler (1994) found that even independent online communities. sophisticated oil companies overpaid for leases won at auction. Thaler concludes Recommendations for Sellers that almost all winners overpay. This means that often, the best advice is not to While buyers are the focus of much advice on bid at all on a given item. So think it over how to avoid fraud, sellers can increase their before bidding on anything. positive ratings and minimize the chances a 6. Be wary of sellers who make outrageous buyer will feel defrauded. quality claims since these sellers obtain higher prices for what often turns out to be 1. Provide a large actual photograph of the average to lower quality. Research item with an accurate description. Point out suggests these sellers are more likely to flaws that could be considered deal not send the item or send a counterfeit. breakers after the fact. Buyers don‟t like (Jin and Kato 2006). surprises unless they‟re positive ones. 7. In general, avoid three-day auction Misrepresentation of merchandise was the listings. This is a favorite tactic of second most common reason for complaint fraudulent sellers of high cost commodity with non-delivery the most common (Gregg items like computers and cameras. By and Scott 2006). making all transactions quickly the seller 2. Don‟t hide your shipping charges and don‟t can leave the system before buyers find charge unconscionable prices for shipping out they‟ve been defrauded due to non- and handling. shipment. 3. Keep the lines of communication open and 8. Don‟t act in haste. If you are inclined to be solicit unofficial feedback. When buyers risk tolerant and impulsive you may be an are upset they need to contact you first ideal eBay buyer, but you are also subject before leaving negative feedback. to greater fraud and poor outcomes. Remember, sellers no longer fear Research by Stern et al. (2008) suggests retaliatory feedback due to eBay‟s new that individuals who are impatient and risk feedback rules. This means it is incumbent tolerant tend to make speedy decisions. on the seller to be exceptionally responsive Such individuals may need protection. to buyers‟ needs. Also, be sure to provide They further argue that the “Buy It Now” buyers with positive feedback to close the option is dangerous. It reduces the time for loop. risk assessment and can lead to making 4. For commodity type merchandise such as risky and high cost mistakes. music, electronics including computers, 9. Especially for collectibles, you may wish software, and new toys, consider selling to stick with items that are certified by a only items either new in box or guaranteed. third party as to their authenticity and For collectible merchandise consider grade. Things like trading cards, comic selling professionally graded items. books, and coins are typical of this 5. Do not sell counterfeit merchandise. As category. In a study of online non-certified reported in the Wall Street Journal, eBay baseball cards sellers often seriously recently lost a case in a French court and overgraded their cards (Jin and Kato was fined $63.2 million (Passariello and 2006). The authors found this type of Mangalindan 2008). The case was based fraud was far less common in retail upon eBay sellers defrauding buyers with collectibles stores. counterfeit Louis Vuitton and Christian Dior items. Some sellers like to pretend

139 Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

buyers know the items they are acquiring 3. List seller information including a physical are “knock-off merchandise” given the address to which buyers send their unusually low prices the items attract. This payment. This allows buyers to decide if is nonsense and selling counterfeits is the seller is legitimate. (See Gavish and illegal. Tucci 2006). 6. If the buyer believes the item was 4. Make buyer education a priority. misdescribed, refund the buyer‟s money. If Eliminating fraud is not possible, but the buyer is abusive, i.e., threatens to education is an excellent way to limit the blackmail you with unjustified negative number of easily defrauded buyers. feedback, blacklist the buyer from bidding 5. Work to get increased community on your items in the future. involvement and at the same time, commit 7. Own up to your own mistakes, yours or more internal resources to fraud prevention. your employees. Fix the problem quickly See Chua, et al. (2007) for an excellent and without negativity. Lin et al. (2007) qualitative analysis of online trading determined that over 40 percent of buyer communities and the role they play in complaints were resolved at the moment minimizing online auction fraud. they were raised. 6. Continue to motivate sellers to provide 8. Send the merchandise quickly and offer better service. Using fee discounts for insurance, particularly with fragile items. sellers who achieve top service ratings is an This common sense advice is often ignored. excellent move and appears to be paying 9. Insist that buyers purchase via PayPal only. off (Mangalindan 2008). By providing It costs you upfront but protects you and buyers the opportunity to rate individual your customers‟ interests. service elements such as speed of service 10. Work especially hard to improve Detailed and accuracy of descriptions eBay has Seller Ratings. This tends to improve the moved the service ball forward. This buyers‟ sense of safety and can reduce your doesn‟t remove fraudulent sellers in and of selling costs. itself, but is a valuable improvement in the feedback system. Recommendations for EBay 7. Get honest sellers to help identify and remove the fraudulent sellers. Honest By eBay‟s own admission, just one percent of sellers are harmed as is the whole eBay the sellers account for thirty-five percent of community when fraud is allowed to negative feedback (Mangalindan 2007). This proliferate. Sellers in a given merchandise sorry statistic represents a failure to remove the classification are often the most worst of the bad sellers. Historically, eBay has knowledgeable about bad sellers and need done too little about bad sellers including those to be brought into the fold. EBay needs defrauding buyers. Here are a few honest sellers as allies, but they must solicit recommendations for eBay that should help their help and then listen and act. reduce fraud and consumer dissatisfaction. EBay sellers have been angered by the changes 1. Commit to a policy of quickly suspending in fee policy and feedback resulting in a boycott sellers who persistently provide poor by sellers (Stewart 2008). The boycott proved service. If the seller is committing fraud, moderately effective, but the changes have permanently remove the seller. stayed in place. EBay can‟t ignore the sellers or 2. Continue efforts to keep bad sellers and be perceived as unduly favoring buyers. As an sellers of counterfeit merchandise out. auction venue, this is an inherent conflict eBay Recent restrictions on sellers of certain faces. Historically, major auction houses relied items like luxury handbags make a lot of on their expertise and corporate reputations to sense. (See Mangalindan 2007). protect buyers from fraud. Instead, eBay relies upon their feedback system and detailed seller

Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 140 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

ratings to establish seller/buyer reputations. minimize actual fraud but, even more Since sellers can‟t leave negative feedback to importantly, building a strong perception of buyers, sellers view this as a reduction in their fairness in all company communications and ability to fight buyer fraud or simply refusal to actions. As an auction venue, eBay can reduce pay for purchases. Because sellers create buyers fraud best by maintaining vigilance and an and visa versa, eBay‟s dilemma is never ongoing dialogue and collaboration with both ending. buyers and sellers.

Since there will always be sellers seeking to REFERENCES defraud buyers it is impossible to eliminate them. However, online communities have Ba, Sulin and Paul A. Pavlou (2002), “Evidence proven value in marshalling the knowledge and of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in expertise required to limit online auction fraud. Electronic Markets: Price Premium and In order to be effective, online communities Buyer Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, 26(3), need the resources and the power of formal 243-268. authority that eBay itself can provide. Bauerly, Ronald J. and Mandeep Singh (2004), Commitment to forcefully removing fraudulent “The Winner‟s Curse and the Issue of Trust sellers identified by individual buyers, sellers, on eBay,” Proceedings of the American and members of online communities is the Society for Business and Behavioral Sciences, single biggest action eBay can take to limit the Eleventh Annual Meeting, February 21, 2004, destructive power of fraud. Las Vegas, NV. Chu, Lenora (2008), “EBay Rivals Circle CONCLUSIONS Vulnerable Auctions King,” CNNMoney.com Fortune Small Business. Retrieved August 1, The risks of being defrauded on eBay are 2008, from http://money.cnn.com/ clearly more significant than claimed. EBay can 2008/02/06/smbusiness/ebay_Alternatives.fsb certainly be faulted for not being more Chua, Cecil Eng Huang, Jonathan Wareham aggressive in combating fraud in the past. and Daniel Robey (2007), “The Role of While critics have regularly taken eBay to task Online Trading Communities in Managing for their poor customer service, honest sellers Internet Auction Fraud,” MIS Quarterly, must understand they can play a larger role too. 31(4), 759-782. As an auction venue provider, eBay‟s new Chwelos, Paul and Tirtha Dhar (2007), focus on safety and buyer satisfaction is “Differences in „Truthiness‟ across Online certainly a step in the right direction. These Reputation Mechanisms,” University of efforts alone are unlikely to result in British Columbia Working Paper, 2007. permanently lower levels of fraud or to truly Retrieved August 1, 2008, from alter the risk perceptions that accompany the http://www.Sauder.ubc.ca/AM/Template.cfm problem. ?Section=News_Releases&Template=/CM/ Content Display.cfm&ContentID=11813 Auction participants can greatly reduce their Consumer Reports (2007). “Winning at eBay: risk of fraud by applying common sense and by How to Bid Smart & Play Safe,” 72(8), following the above recommendations. Honest August, 12-14. sellers must also work to minimize buyer Dewally, Michael and Louis Ederington (2006), dissatisfaction and make eBay a safer venue to “Reputation, Certification, Warranties, and do business. EBay‟s feedback changes should Information as Remedies for Seller-Buyer improve the usefulness and trust in seller Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the ratings, but the changes eBay has made will not Online Comic Book Market,” Journal of be a panacea. Sellers must commit to a buyer- Business, 79(21), 693-729. centric focus whose mantra will be trust. Building trust requires not just trying to

141 Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

Dholakia, Utpal M. (2005), “The Usefulness of Internet Crime Complaint Center IC3 (2007), Bidders‟ Reputation Ratings to Sellers in “The Internet Crime Complaint Center Hits 1 Online Auctions,” Journal of Interactive Million!” Retrieved May 28, 2008, from Marketing, 19(1), 31-40. http://www.ic3.gov/media/2007/070613.htm. EBay. (2008), “User Agreement”. Retrieved Internet Fraud Crime Report (2006), Published May 27, 2008, from http://pages.ebay. by the Internet Crime Complaint Center. com/help/Policies/user-agreement.html. Retrieved June 25, 2008, from EBay. (2008a), “About Buyer Protection www.ic3.gov/media/annualreport/2006_IC3R Programs”. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from eport.pdf. http://ebay.com/help/tp/isgw -buyer - Jin, Ginger Zhe and Andrew Kato (2006), protection-steps.html. “Price, Quality, and Reputation: Evidence EBay. (2008b), “Trust & Safety Discussion from an Online Field Experiment,” The Rand Board”. Retrieved July 11, 2008, from Journal of Economics, (Winter) 37(4), http://forums. 983-1005. Ebay.com/db2/forum.jspa?forumID=107 Kirsner, Scott (2003), “Catch Me if You Can,” EBay (2008c), “Feedback Changes”. Retrieved Fast Company, 73 (August), 72-77. July 11, 2008, from http://pages.ebay.com/ Lin, Zhangxi, Dahui Li, and Wayne W. Huang services/Forum/new.html. (2007), “Traders Beware: An Examination of EBay (2008d), “An Update on Feedback the Distribution of eBay Sellers‟ Online System”. Retrieved July 11, 2008, from Reputation,” International Journal of http://pages. Electronic Business, 5 (5), 499-517. Ebay.com/Services/forum/feedback.html Lucking-Reiley, D. (1999), “Using Field Federal Trade Commission (2006), “Internet Experiments to Test Equivalence between Auction: A Guide for Buyers and Sellers”. Auction Formats: Magic on the Internet,” The Retrieved June 28, 2008, from American Economic Review, 89(5), http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/online/a 1063-1080. uctions.shtm. Lucking-Reiley, David, Doug Bryan, Naghi FinancialWire (2007), “EBay Changes Prasad and Daniel Reeves (2007), “Pennies Merchant Entry Requirements”. Retrieved from eBay: The Determinants of Price in June 27, 2008 from http://proquest.umi. Online Auctions,” Journal of Industrial com/pqdweb?index=16&did=1196125981&S Economics, 55(2), 223-233. rchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD& Mangalindan, Mylene (2007), “EBay Makes a VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&T Bid to Lure Lapsed Buyers,” Wall Street S=1199553147&clientId=3480. Journal, October 12, 2007, B1, B2. Gavish, Bezalel and Christopher L. Tucci Mangalindan, Mylene (2008), “EBay Users Set (2006), “Fraudulent Auctions on the to Question CEO on Changes,” Wall Street Internet,” Electronic Commerce Research, Journal, June 19, 2008, B8. 6(2), 127-140. Mangalindan, Mylene and Vanessa O‟Connell Gregg, Dawn G. and Judy E. Scott (2006), “The (2008), “EBay Wins in Fight Over Tiffany Role of Reputation Systems in Reducing Counterfeits,” Wall Street Journal, July 15, Online Auction Fraud,” International Journal 2008, B1. of Electronic Commerce, 10 (3), 95-120. Metz, Rachel (2008), “EBay Beats Tiffany in Guth, Werner, Friederike Mengel and Axel Court Case Over Trademarks,” Yahoo Ockenfels (2007), “An Evolutionary Finance, Retrieved July 15, 2008, Analysis of Buyer Insurance and Seller http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080714/ap_on Reputation in Online Markets,” Theory and _hi_te/ebay_tiffany (July 14, 2008). Decision, 63(3), 265-282. Nikitkov, Alex and Darlene Bay (2008), Holahan, Catherine (2008), “EBay‟s New “Online Auction Fraud: Ethical Perspective,” Tough Love CEO,” Business Week. Journal of Business Ethics, 79 (3), 235-244. February 4, 58-59.

Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009 142 Online Auction Fraud and EBay Bauerly

Passariello, Christina and Mylene Mangalindan Zouhali-Worrall (2008), “Outraged eBay (2008), “EBay Fined over Selling Sellers Plot Strike Week,” CNNMoney.com Counterfeits,” Wall Street Journal, July 1, Fortune Small Business. Retrieved at May 2008, B1. 17, 2008, from http://money.cnn.com/2008 Pavlou, Paul A. and Angelika Dimoka (2006), /02/07/smbusiness/ebay_Boycott.fsb/index.ht “The Nature and Role of Feedback Text m?source=yahoo_quote. Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation.” Information Systems Research, Linthicum: Dec 2006. 17(4), 392-416. Resnick, Paul, Richard Zeckhauser, John Swanson and Kate Lockwood. (2006), “The Value of Reputation on eBay: A Controlled Experiment,” Experimental Economics, 9(20), 79-101. Snyder, James M. (2000), “Online Auction Fraud: Are the Auction Houses Doing All They Should or Could to Stop Online Fraud?” Federal Communications Law Journal, (March) 52, 2, 453-472. Steiner, David (2003), “Survey: How Do Users Feel About eBay‟s Feedback System?” (Jan. 19.) AuctionBytes.com. Retrieved July 8, 2008 from http://www.auctionbytes. com/cab/abu/y203/m01/abu0087/s02. Stern, Barbara B., Marla B. Royne, Thomas F. Stafford and Carol C. Bienstock (2008), “Consumer Acceptance of Online Auctions: An Extension and Revision of the TAM,” Psychology & Marketing, 25(7), 619-636. Stewart, Brandi (2008), “EBay Boycott Winds Down but Anger Remains,” CNNMoney.com Fortune Small Business. Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://money.cnn.com /2008/02/25/sm business/_ebay_boycott _wraps.fsb/index.htm?postversion+20080226 11 (February 26, 2008). Thaler, Richard (1994), The Winner's Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. Princeton University Press. VeriSign (2003), “Internet Security Intelligence Briefing”, October, 2003. Retrieved June 16, 2008 from http://www.verisign. com/static/005572.pdf

143 Marketing Management Journal, Spring 2009