Analysis of Wave Characteristics in Osaka Bay for Three Major Typhoons Using WAVEWATCH III

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysis of Wave Characteristics in Osaka Bay for Three Major Typhoons Using WAVEWATCH III Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering), Vol. 75, No. 2, I_289-I_294, 2019. Analysis of Wave Characteristics in Osaka Bay for Three Major Typhoons Using WAVEWATCH III Chathura MANAWASEKARA1, Yiqing XIA2, Mangala AMUNUGAMA3, Yoji TANAKA4, Katsuyuki SUZUYAMA5 1Member of JSCE, Disaster Prevention Division, Wave Analysis Dept., ECOH CORPORATION (2-6-4, Taito-ku, Tokyo 110-0014, Japan) E-mail:[email protected] 2Disaster Prevention Division, Wave Analysis Dept., ECOH CORPORATION (2-6-4, Taito-ku, Tokyo 110-0014, Japan) E-mail:[email protected] 3Technical Research Institute, ECOH CORPORATION (2-6-4, Taito-ku, Tokyo 110-0014, Japan) 4Member of JSCE, Disaster Prevention Division, Wave Analysis Dept., ECOH CORPORATION (2-6-4, Taito-ku, Tokyo 110-0014, Japan) 5Disaster Prevention Division, Wave Analysis Dept., ECOH CORPORATION (2-6-4, Taito-ku, Tokyo 110-0014, Japan) E-mail:[email protected] Typhoon generated wave behavior in Osaka Bay under recent three major typhoons (T1820, T1821, and T1824) is simulated and discussed in the study. Simulation was conducted using third generation wave model WAVEWATCH III, and results showed that the impact areas for each typhoon can be explained by looking in to the sea wave properties enter into the bay area. Wave energy is represented with significant wave height related to each categorized components of wave frequency, and their contribution to the damages and critical conditions caused by each typhoon are discussed. Analysis shows that the longer period swell enters into the bay area for T1821 than that of for T1820. In contrary, effect of wind waves for T1820 is larger in North and West side of the bay while T1821 affect more in the Eastward side. In addi- tion, wind data from two sources [Local Forecast Model (LFM) and Meso Scale Model (MSM)] by Jap- anese Meteorological Agency (JMA) were used in the study and the simulation effectiveness in related to wind source is also discussed in the study. However, results with newer and finer LFM wind data showed better agreement with observations in comparison to weaker MSM wind data. Key Words : Typhoon Cimaron (1820), Typhoon Jebi (1821), Osaka Bay, WAVEWATCH III , LFM 1. INTRODUCTION are capable of causing variety of damages and poses a serious threat to properties specially in the coastal Extensive damage to coastal structures and facili- region. Therefore, typhoon generated wave heights ties caused by three big typhoons (T1820, T1821, play a major role in determine the design limitations and T1824) passing central Japan (in latter half of of coastal structures in most part of Japan. With year 2018) has drawn great attention, particularly number of economically important sites laying with regards to the reliability of existing safety around (Kobe port, Osaka port, Kansai International measures against typhoon-induced waves. The airport etc.), Osaka bay region plays a central role in large-scale economic loss from the halted operations economy of Western Japan. Moreover, even though in Kansai International Airport due to flooding by recent super-typhoons Cimaron and Jebi both made typhoon Jebi (T1821) has also emphasized the level their initial landfall in the southern part of To- of vulnerability present under passing typhoons. kushima prefecture before crossing Osaka Bay with During the annual typhoon season (generally from slightly varied paths, typhoon induced wave charac- May to October) at least about three typhoons hit the teristics and major damage areas appeared to be have mainland of Japan, and it is evident that typhoons are significant difference from each other. Therefore, it getting stronger in recent years. High waves, sudden is worth studying the typhoon-induced wave distri- rise of water levels and strong winds under typhoons bution in the wide and shallow sea area of the bay I_289 Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering), Vol. 75, No. 2, I_289-I_294, 2019. after entering through Kii-channel, and becomes the aim of the current research. In this study, we employed the third-generation wave model, WAVEWATCH III (WW3) to simulate the wave conditions under typhoon events T1820 (Cimaron), T1821 and T1824 (Trami). The applica- bility of WW3 in extreme wind situations has been addressed and confirmed in several recent studies1)2). LFM wind data provided by JMA were used as the main wind source for the study, and the main wave analysis and comparisons in the paper were con- ducted with wave simulation results using LFM winds. Additionally, a comaparison between results by LFM and MSM wind sources were done in the latter part of the paper. LFM, finer in resolution and the latest of two models, implemented in 2012 and provides data at every 1-hour interval. Recently, Kawaguchi et al.3) have successfully employed LFM winds in wave modelling under Typhoon Lan. A comparison between two wind sources and their results are discussed in the latter part of the paper. Fig. 1 Computational domains (D1-D4) and data extraction points in D4 2. NUMERICAL MODEL (1) Brief description of wave model In WW3 the generation, evolution and dissipation of ocean surface waves are predicted by solving the balance equation, DN txk ),;,( S = (1) Dt where, k is the wavenumber, is the wave direction, is the intrinsic frequency, x and t represent the space and time coordinates, respectively, = ()txkFN /,;, is the wave action density spec- trum, F is the wavenumber-direction spectrum, and S represents the net effect of source and sink terms for F. The latest version of WW3 (version 5.16) is em- Fig. 2 Typhoon path over mainland of Japan ployed using spherical coordinate system, and more detailed explanation on the numerics and physics of the model is available in the user manual and system documentation of WW34). (2) Model set-up and parameters The input/dissipation source terms proposed by 5) Ardhuin et al. (ST4 in WW3) are applied in the current study with frequency and directional divi- sions of 35 and 36, respectively. Four nested (one-way) computation domains are used in the simulation with increasing resolution (from D1-D4 with grid resolutions 1/4⁰, 1/16⁰, 1/64⁰, 1/256⁰, re- spectively) when converging on the target area. A 0 minimum grid size of around 400m (1/256 ) is se- lected especially in order to represent critical topo- Fig. 3 Temporal variation wave height (above) and period (below) graphical properties effectively in the computation. at NW-Kobe for simulation and observation I_290 Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering), Vol. 75, No. 2, I_289-I_294, 2019. (a) (b) (c) (d) T1820 T1821 T1824 T1820-T1821 Fig. 4 (a-c)Maximum sig. wave height by each typhoon and, (d) difference in maximum wave heights between T1820 and T1821 Wind data were input to WW3 at 20min time-interval and simulation output data were also recorded at the (2) Spectral analysis same time-interval. Graphical representation of each a) Wave spectrum at points domain area shown in Fig. 1 and the path of each In order to look into the composition of sea waves, typhoon over the area are as in Fig. 2. we extracted wave spectrum at points (Pt1-Pt4) in D4 shown in Fig. 1, at the peak time of NW-Kobe. Fig. 5 illustrates the frequency and directional spectrum at 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Pt1 to Pt4 for T1820 and T1821. Even though the directional spectrum at Pt1 and Pt3 have distinct peaks between S-SW for both typhoons, it is evident (1) Validation of simulated wave that T1820 has higher level of energy travelling in Simulation results are compared with the obser- northward direction. The peak frequency lies around vations at NOWPHAS (Nationwide Ocean Wave 0.12Hz (wave period of ~8.3s) for both Pt1 and Pt3. information network for Ports and HArbours) data According to general classification, periods less than collection station located in Kobe (NW-Kobe). In the 8s (equivalently, frequency >0.125Hz) are consid- simulation T1820 reached the peak significant wave ered to be wind waves while rest to be considered height at NW-Kobe 08/24 00:20 while T1821 and swell. Thus, indicating under T1820 wind waves has T1824 reached peak at 09/04 14:40 and 10/01 00:40, been the cause for much of the impacts in the north respectively. Considering peak time as t=0 for each part of the bay. typhoon, temporal variation of wave height and pe- Concurrently, frequency spectrum of Pt4 shows riod for 9-hour period either side of the peak time are similar variations for both T1820 and T1821. How- depicted in . Even though, both T1820 and Fig. 3 ever noticeably swell component (frequency T1821 simulations slightly underestimate the peak <0.125Hz) of appears slightly higher at Pt2 for wave heights, overall, simulation results are in good T1821. Generally, with longer wave length and agreement with observation data. However, this higher wave periods swell tend to carry few times study does not account for the effect of sea level more energy than wind waves with corresponding change due to the storm surge caused by the typhoon. wave height. Therefore, we shed closer attention to Wave height is expected to increase with such rise in energy carried by each wave component through water depth, and can assume to be contributed to the discrepancy observation data. (a) (b) T1820 T1821 In addition, T1820 is slower in retreat in compar- ison to T1821, indicating that wave effect from T1820 last longer for the particular area. At the same time wave periods of 4s-8s are dominant for all ty- phoon events. Fig. 4(a-c) shows the spatial variation of the maximum significant wave height observed during each typhoon.
Recommended publications
  • Monday, August 20, 2018 8:30 A.M. EDT Significant Activity – Aug 17-20
    Monday, August 20, 2018 8:30 a.m. EDT Significant Activity – Aug 17-20 Significant Events: Western wildfires Tropical Activity: • Atlantic – No tropical cyclones expected in next 48 hours • Eastern Pacific – No tropical cyclone expected in next 48 hours • Central Pacific – Hurricane Lane (CAT 3) • Western Pacific – Typhoon Cimaron (23W) Significant Weather: • Severe thunderstorms possible – Lower/Middle Mississippi valleys to the Tennessee and Ohio Valleys • Flash flooding possible – Lower Mississippi/Tennessee valleys to Upper Mississippi Valley and Great Lakes • Elevated fire weather – CA, NV, UT, OR & WA • Isolated dry thunderstorms – OR, WA, ID & MT • Red Flag Warnings – UT, OR, WA, & ID Declaration Activity: • Major Disaster Declaration Request – Iowa • Major Disaster Declaration approved – Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation • Amendment No. 1 to FEMA-4382-DR-CA Wildfire Summary Fire Name FMAG Acres Percent Evacuations Structures Fatalities / (County) Number Burned Contained (Residents) Threatened Damaged Destroyed Injuries California (1) Mendocino 389,967 79% Mandatory 1,050 (+25) 38 (+2) 277 (+12) Complex 5262-FM-CA 0 / 2 (+10,247) (+3) 1,988 (+859) (1,025 homes) (13 homes) (157 homes) (Mendocino & Lake) Washington (2) Cougar Creek 37,775 (Chelan) 5270-FM-WA 35% Voluntary only 300 homes 0 0 0 / 3 Final (+1,056) Boyds 43% 162 4 (Ferry) 5273-FM-WA 3,065 Voluntary only 0 0 / 7 (+3) Final (+12) (161 homes) (3 homes) Hurricane Lane – Central Pacific Hurricane Lane – CAT 3 (Advisory #22 as of 5:00 a.m. EDT) • Located 675 miles
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 UTC 19 August 2018 Forecast Discussion Summary Typhoon
    2000 UTC 19 August 2018 Forecast Discussion Summary Typhoon Soulik should maintain its intensity over the next 48 hours and TS Cimaron should intensify despite moderate shear. No other TC genesis is expected in the short term. The transit from Taiwan to the operation are or the location of the Mirai (~13N, 137E) should experience westerly to southwesterly winds which will increase with time and as the Thompson moves south. Strengthening monsoonal flow along the transit region in the NAVGEM shows the possibility of 10-m winds exceeding 30 kt over a large swath covering the transit region. Significant wave heights are expected to also increase with time with the potential for waves of 15-18 ft. Day One (24 hr) Outlook: Typhoon Soulik will maintain its current intensity (95 kts) as it tracks ​ northwest. TS Cimaron will likely intensity steadily in spite of strong shear by ~15 kts (70 kts). No direct threat to operations from either storm. Significant wave heights are expected to increase to 7-9 feet. Scattered convection between southern Taiwan and the northern Philippines will persist along the transit route. 10-m winds between the Luzon strait and just east of the Luzon could reach 20-25 kt. Day Two (48 hr) Outlook: Typhoon Soulik might intensify another 5 kts, but that should bring it ​ to its maximum intensity before interacting with the jet stream south of Korea. TS Cimaron should continue steadily intensifying by another ~10 kts as it passes just north of the northern Mariana islands. Significant wave heights up to 12 feet possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Binary Interaction of Typhoons Soulik and Cimaron in 2018 E Part I: Observational Characteristics and Forecast Error
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Tropical Cyclone Research and Review 10 (2021) 32e42 www.keaipublishing.com/tcrr Binary interaction of typhoons Soulik and Cimaron in 2018 e Part I: Observational characteristics and forecast error Eun-Jeong Cha a, Sug-gyeong Yun a, Il-Ju Moon b,*, Dong-Hoon Kim c a Meso-scale Research Team, Convergence Meteorological Research Department, National Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Korea Meteorological Administration, Seogwipo, Republic of Korea b Typhoon Research Center, Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea c Artificial Intelligence Convergence Research Center, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea Available online 18 March 2021 Abstract To understand structural changes and forecast error, a case study of binary typhoons in the western North Pacific (WNP) of 2018 was investigated using best track and reanalysis data. Soulik was generated on August 16 and Cimaron was generated on August 18, respectively. The 19th typhoon Soulik and 20th typhoon Cimaron co-existed from August 18 to 24 and approached each other. Soulik was located on the western side and Cimaron was located on the eastern side of the WNP. They were located approximately 1300 km from each other at 00 UTC August 22. The Soulik structure began changing around August 22 and became weak and slow, while Cimaron maintained its intensity, size, and moving speed. This observational evidence is likely caused by the binary interaction between two typhoons within a certain distance and environmental steering flow, such as the location of the North Pacific high and strong jet stream of the northern flank of the North Pacific high.
    [Show full text]
  • Report for Typhoon
    Country Report ( 2007 ) For the 40th Session of the Typhoon Committee ESCAP/WMO Macao, China 21–26 November 2007 People’s Republic of China 1 I. Overview of Meteorological and Hydrological Conditions 1. Meteorological Assessment From Oct. 1st 2006 to Sep. 30th 2007, altogether 23 tropical cyclones (including tropical storms, severe tropical storms, typhoons, severe typhoons and super typhoons) formed over the Western North Pacific and the South China Sea (Fig. 1.1). Among them, 8 TCs formed from Oct. 1st to Dec. 31st in 2006 and 4 of them affected China’s coastal waters but didn’t land on China’s coastal areas. They were super typhoon Cimaron (0619), super typhoon Chebi 0620), super typhoon Durian (0621) and severe typhoon Utor (0622). In 2007, 15 tropical cyclones formed over the Western North Pacific and the South China Sea. The number was obviously less than the average (19.7) during the corresponding period from 1949 to 2006. And 9 of them developed into typhoons or beyond, which accounted for 60.0% of the total. The percentage was higher than the average (58.6%). During the same period, 4 TCs formed over the South China Sea. The number was slightly less than the average (4.7). Moreover, 6 TCs made landfalls over China coastal areas, all of them exceed tropical storm category. They were tropical storm Toraji (0703), severe tropical storm Pabuk 0706), tropical storm Wupit 0707), super typhoon Sepat (0708), super typhoon Wipha 0712) and tropical storm Francisco (0713). The total landed TC number was slightly less than the average (about 6.79), but the percentage of landed TCs (40.0%) was obviously above the average (30.8%).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2007
    ESCAP/WMO TCAR 2007 Typhoon Committee Over 40 years of InternationalAnnual Cooperation Review Kong-Rey Yutu Toraji Man-Yi Usagi Pabuk Wutip Sepat Fitow Danas Nari Wipha Francisco Lekima Krosa Haiyan Podul Lingling Kajiki Faxai Peipah Tapah Mitag Hagibis ESCAP/ WMO Typhoon Committee 20071 ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee Annual Review 2007 On the Cover: MTSAT-1R VS imagery of SEPAT (0708) at 00UTC, 16 August 2007.(By courtesy of Japan Meteorological Agency) The headquarters of the Typhoon Committee Secretariat. 2 TCAR Contents 2007 CONTENTS ESCAP, WMO and the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee 7 Typhoon Committee (2006 – 2007) 9 ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee Annual Review 2007 Editorial Board 11 Foreword 13 Introduction 15 Chapter 1 Typhoon Committee Activities 2007 1.1 Meteorology 17 1.2 Hydrology 105 1.3 Disaster Prevention and Preparedness (DPP) 153 1.4 Typhoon Committee Secretariat (TCS) 195 Chapter 2 Tropical Cyclones in 2007 2.1 Overview 197 2.2 Report on individual tropical cyclones which affected Members of the Typhoon Committee 2.2.1 Kong-Rey (0701) 204 2.2.2 Yutu (0702) 206 2.2.3 Toraji (0703) 208 2.2.4 Man-Yi (0704) 210 2.2.5 Usagi (0705) 212 2.2.7 Wutip (0707) 216 2.2.8 Sepat (0708) 218 2.2.9 Fitow (0709) 220 2.2.10 Danas (0710) 222 2.2.11 Nari (0711) 224 2.2.12 Wipha (0712) 226 2.2.13 Francisco (0713) 228 2.2.14 Lekima (0714) 230 2.2.15 Krosa (0715) 232 2.2.16 Haiyan (0716) 234 2.2.17 Podul (0717) 236 2.2.18 Lingling (0718) 238 2.2.19 Kajiki (0719) 240 2.2.20 Faxai (0720) 242 2.2.21 Peipah (0721) 244 2.2.22 Tapah (0722) 246 2.2.23 Mitag (0723) 248 2.2.24 Hagibis (0724) 250 3 ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee Annual Review 2007 Chapter 3 Contributed Papers Zhiyu Liu, Bureau of Hydrology, Ministry of Water Resources of China “Mountainous Torrent Disasters and Approaches to Flash Flood Early Warning in China” 253 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • IAHR Porto 2014
    Proceedings of the 22nd IAHR-APD Congress 2020, Sapporo, Japan HIGH WAVE CONIDITIONS DUE TO TYPHOONS MEASURED AT AN OFFSHORE OBSERVATION TOWER YASUYUKI BABA Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Nishi-muro, Wakayama, Japan, [email protected] TERUHIRO KUBO Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Nishi-muro, Wakayama, Japan NOBUHITO MORI Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, Japan YASUNORI WATANABE Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan TOMOHITO YAMADA Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan AYUMI SARUWATARI Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan JUNICHI OTSUKA Civil Engineering Research Institute for Cold Region, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan YUSUKE UCHIYAMA Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan JUNICHI NINOMIYA Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan TOMOYA SHIMURA Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, Japan ABSTRACT This paper shows some observation results on high wave condition due to typhoons measured at an offshore observation tower. Japan is affected by typhoons every year, and some typhoons cause serious damages in Kii peninsula and its surrounding areas sometimes. In 2018, three typhoons (No.20, 21, 24) approached around the Kii peninsula, and the severe wave conditions caused by the typhoon Jebi (No.21) and the typhoon Trami (No.24) are observed at the observation tower of SOO. During the typhoon Jebi and the typhoon Trami approaching, the maximum significant wave heights reach 9.60m by the typhoon Jebi and 11.09m by the typhoon Trami, respectively. On the other hand, wave condition caused by the typhoon Cimaron (No.20) is relatively milder than the ones by the typhoon Jebi and the typhoon Trami, even though a central atmospheric pressure and the distance between the center of the typhoon and the observation tower are similar to those of the typhoon Jebi and the typhoon Trami.
    [Show full text]
  • 二零一八熱帶氣旋tropical Cyclones in 2018
    Ḵ暞ᶨℓ⸜䘬䅙ⷞ㯋㕳嶗⼹⚾ TRACKS OF TROPICAL CYCLONES IN 2018 㭷㖍⋼婧ᶾ䓴㗪暞㗪ỵ伖(楁㷗㗪攻ᶲ⋰ℓ㗪), ࡁ؍ ⫷ㅖ㲏ѝཞᮨⴞᆇẋ堐娚㚰䘬ᰕ Daily Positions at 00 UTC(08 HKT), '36/2 Є߃0;2 ⽭ډ the number in the symbol represents the date of the month 坤ԃ 154-8+? 95;2/1 㖂ॱ ԝ߃5): ࣭࣭ 㭷ℕ⮷㗪ỵ伖 ҷ߃';- =;154- 9.'49.'4 Intermediate 6-hourly Positions ੼榆⛃ Є߃0;2 棁䓃 ҷ߃';- )/3'854 0+(/ 崭⻟桙桐 Super Typhoon ҷ߃';- Ь߃9+6 ⻟桙桐 Severe Typhoon 䉷২ ؍ࡵࡁ 桙桐 Typhoon 68'6/8554 :8'3/ Є߃0;2 Ь߃9+6 ⻟䁰䅙ⷞ桐㙜 Severe Tropical Storm 䅙ⷞ桐㙜 Tropical Storm ݦ兺 ?'-/ 榆ԃގ 䅙ⷞỶ㯋⡻ Tropical Depression ҷ߃';- 3'2/19/ 湞䛵 ҹ߃0;4 Ỷ⡻⋨ Low Pressure Area 2++6/ ҷ߃';- 曾曓 䇃ࡁ☓ 054-*'8/ 8;3(/' ҷ߃';- ҷ߃';- ۺ૙ұ .+):58 ҷ߃';- 䜨哿☓ ࠀ২ -'+3/ 3'8/' 䒠㍼Ѻ㾎⺷ 䇃ࡁ☓ ҹ߃0;4 Є߃0;2 :* 8;3(/' Є߃0;2 ҷ߃';- ঁٌ 䒠㍼Ѻ㾎⺷ 3'4-1.;: ۺ௚࢔ :* ૙ұ Ь߃9+6 Hong Kong ҷ߃';- 䒠㍼Ѻ㾎⺷ .+):58 -;'ਬ曾ؿ :* ҷ߃ ٌ॔ +=/4/'8 ҷ߃';- 喗ؖ 954:/4. ҹ߃0;4 3'4?/ 㖂ॱ Є߃0;2 ࠀ২ ԝ▲߃45< =;154- -'+3/ घୌⰧ Є߃0;2 ؍ҹ߃0;4 ࡵࡁ :'8/0') 68'6/8554 Ь߃9+6 घୌⰧ ҹ߃0;4 湞䛵 ٌ॔ ('8/0': ߟܞ啠 954:/4. 曾曓 2++6/ Ь߃9+6 0+2'=': -;' ҷ߃᳦ֺ Є߃0;2 054-*'8/ ࡁ ݦ兺 ֚߃'68 ࣭࣭؍ ?;:; Є߃0;2 嶔䬐Ⱗ ?'-/ 9.'49.'4 ԝ▲߃45< '36/2 (+(/4)' 䒠㍼Ѻ㾎⺷ ҷ߃';- 嶔䬐Ⱗ Є߃0;2 ҷ߃';- ҷ߃';- :* (+(/4)' Є߃0;2 榆ԃގ ҷ߃';- 3'2/19/ ҹ߃0;4 䉷২ 坤ԃ :8'3/ 95;2/1 -;'喗 Ь߃9+6 ҷ߃ܞ٢ ٧٢ 6'(;1 (52'<+4 ࠂ吤 ਬ曾ؿ 棁䓃 ▲߃0'4 ▲߃0'4 ੼榆⛃ :58'0/ +=/4/'8 0+(/ ીֺ )/3'854 ঁٌ -;'ԝ▲߃45< ҹ߃0;4 ҷ߃ ;9'-/ ҷ߃';- :;.ԝ▲߃45< 䜨哿☓ 3'4-1 ⡕מ ;9'-/ Ь߃9+6 '/8'3 ⽭ډ ԝ▲߃45< Є߃0;2喗 154-8+?ܞ٢ ࠂ吤 (52'<+4 Ь߃9+6 :58'0/ ▲߃0'4 ࣥ⡕ ԝ▲߃45< 䒠㍼Ѻ㾎⺷ 䒠㍼Ѻ㾎⺷ ?;:; :* :* ԝ߃5): ԝи߃*+) ߟܞ啠 (+*ԝи߃ ٧٢ 0+2'=': Іٞ 1;)'6 І߃3'8 ԝи߃*+) 9'4(' Іٞ и߃,+( 9'4(' и߃,+( 喗ؖ 3'4?/ ԝ▲߃45< 二零一 八 年 熱帶氣旋 TROPICAL CYCLONES IN 2018 2 二零二零年一月出版 Published January 2020 香港天文台編製 香港九龍彌敦道134A Prepared by: Hong Kong Observatory 134A Nathan Road Kowloon, Hong Kong © 版權所有。未經香港天文台台長同意,不得翻印本刊物任何部分內容。 © Copyright reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge-Note-1-Assessing-And
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Learning from Japan’s Experience inIntegratedUrbanFloodRisk Management: fromJapan’s Learning Knowledge Note 1: Assessing and Communicating UrbanFloodRisk andCommunicating Note1:Assessing Knowledge A Series of Knowledge Notes A Series ofKnowledge ©2019 The World Bank International Bank for Reconstruction and Development The World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 USA October 2019 DISCLAIMER This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The report reflects information available up to June 30, 2019. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; e-mail: [email protected]. CITATION Please cite this series of knowledge notes and/or its individual elements as follows: World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • TYPHOON CIMARON 082018 Nd
    Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Office of the Governor HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Honorable Ralph DLG. Torres, Governor Gerald J. Deleon Guerrero, Special Assistant Honorable Victor B. Hocog, Lieutenant Governor COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS Office of the Governor Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 20, 2018 Governor Ralph DLG. Torres Upgrades Alamagan, Pagan & Agrihan to Typhoon Condition I; Saipan & Tinian to Tropical Storm Condition I Because of the anticipated threat of Typhoon Cimaron, Governor Ralph DLG. Torres has upgraded the islands of Saipan & Tinian from Tropical Storm Condition II to Tropical Storm Condition I, and Typhoon Condition II to Typhoon Condition I for the islands of Alamagan, Pagan & Agrihan. Typhoon Cimaron is expected to make its Closest Point of Approach (CPA) to the Marianas this afternoon at 3PM; however, the residents of the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands can expect the worst weather conditions to occur Monday evening into early Tuesday morning for the islands of Saipan, Tinian, Alamagan, Pagan and Agrihan. Although Cimaron has been upgraded from Tropical Storm Cimaron to Typhoon Cimaron, this does not mean the islands of Saipan and Tinian will be experiencing Typhoon-strength winds. This simply means the center of Typhoon Cimaron has been upgraded in strength from Tropical Storm-strength to Typhoon-strength conditions. Weather Outlook As of 1PM CHST, the center of Typhoon Cimaron was located 17.3 N Latitude, 148.5 E Longitude. Typhoon Cimaron is moving toward the West-Northwest at 7 MPH, and is expected to make a slight turn toward the Northwest with an increase in forward speed over the next 24 hours with Maximum sustained winds at 75 MPH.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on All Cyclones That Formed in 2018, with Detailed Season Statistics and Records That Were Achieved Worldwide This Year
    A report on all cyclones that formed in 2018, with detailed season statistics and records that were achieved worldwide this year. Compiled by Nathan Foy at Force Thirteen, December 2018, January 2019 E-mail: [email protected] Cover photo: International Space Station image of Hurricane Lane on August 18, 2018 Below photo: GOES-16 Sandwich imagery of Hurricane Michael shortly before its Florida landfall on October 10, 2018. Originally sourced from Force Thirteen’s live stream output. Contents 1. Background 3 1.1 2018 in summary 3 1.2 Pre-season predictions 4 1.3 Historical perspective 6 2. The 2018 Datasheet 9 2.1 Peak Intensities 9 2.2 Amount of Landfalls and Nations Affected 12 2.3 Fatalities, Injuries, and Missing persons 17 2.4 Monetary damages 19 2.5 Buildings damaged and destroyed 21 2.6 Evacuees 22 2.7 Timeline 23 3. 2018 Storm Records 26 3.1 Intensity and Longevity 27 3.2 Activity Records 30 3.3 Landfall Records 32 3.4 Eye and Size Records 33 3.5 Intensification Rate 34 4. Force Thirteen during 2018 35 4.1 Forecasting critique and storm coverage 36 4.2 Viewing statistics 37 5. 2018 Storm Image Gallery 39 6. Ways to contact Force Thirteen 42 2 1.1. 2018 in Summary Activity in 2018 has been well above average, with numbers approaching record levels. Sea Surface temperatures started cooler than average, but warmed relative to average through the year building into a mild El Nino event. The Pacific and North Indian Ocean behaved as expected for the prevailing conditions, all having well above average seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • 二零一八熱帶氣旋tropical Cyclones in 2018
    156 第四節 熱帶氣旋統計表 表4.1是二零一八年在北太平洋西部及南海區域(即由赤道至北緯45度、東 經 100度至180 度所包括的範圍)的熱帶氣旋一覽。表內所列出的日期只說明某熱帶氣旋在上述範圍內 出現的時間,因而不一定包括整個風暴過程。這個限制對表內其他元素亦同樣適用。 表4.2是天文台在二零一八年為船舶發出的熱帶氣旋警告的次數、時段、首個及末個警告 發出的時間。當有熱帶氣旋位於香港責任範圍內時(即由北緯10至30度、東經105至125 度所包括的範圍),天文台會發出這些警告。表內使用的時間為協調世界時。 表4.3是二零一八年熱帶氣旋警告信號發出的次數及其時段的摘要。表內亦提供每次熱帶 氣旋警告信號生效的時間和發出警報的次數。表內使用的時間為香港時間。 表4.4是一九五六至二零一八年間熱帶氣旋警告信號發出的次數及其時段的摘要。 表4.5是一九五六至二零一八年間每年位於香港責任範圍內以及每年引致天文台需要發 出熱帶氣旋警告信號的熱帶氣旋總數。 表4.6是一九五六至二零一八年間天文台發出各種熱帶氣旋警告信號的最長、最短及平均 時段。 表4.7是二零一八年當熱帶氣旋影響香港時本港的氣象觀測摘要。資料包括熱帶氣旋最接 近香港時的位置及時間和當時估計熱帶氣旋中心附近的最低氣壓、京士柏、香港國際機 場及橫瀾島錄得的最高風速、香港天文台錄得的最低平均海平面氣壓以及香港各潮汐測 量站錄得的最大風暴潮(即實際水位高出潮汐表中預計的部分,單位為米)。 表4.8.1是二零一八年位於香港600公里範圍內的熱帶氣旋及其為香港所帶來的雨量。 表4.8.2是一八八四至一九三九年以及一九四七至二零一八年十個為香港帶來最多雨量 的熱帶氣旋和有關的雨量資料。 表4.9是自一九四六年至二零一八年間,天文台發出十號颶風信號時所錄得的氣象資料, 包括熱帶氣旋吹襲香港時的最近距離及方位、天文台錄得的最低平均海平面氣壓、香港 各站錄得的最高60分鐘平均風速和最高陣風。 表4.10是二零一八年熱帶氣旋在香港所造成的損失。資料參考了各政府部門和公共事業 機構所提供的報告及本地報章的報導,當中超強颱風山竹(1822)引致香港直接經濟損失 的估算的詳情載於附件一。 表4.11是一九六零至二零一八年間熱帶氣旋在香港所造成的人命傷亡及破壞。資料參考 了各政府部門和公共事業機構所提供的報告及本地報章的報導。 表4.12是二零一八年天文台發出的熱帶氣旋路徑預測驗証。 157 Section 4 TROPICAL CYCLONE STATISTICS AND TABLES TABLE 4.1 is a list of tropical cyclones in 2018 in the western North Pacific and the South China Sea (i.e. the area bounded by the Equator, 45°N, 100°E and 180°). The dates cited are the residence times of each tropical cyclone within the above-mentioned region and as such might not cover the full life- span. This limitation applies to all other elements in the table. TABLE 4.2 gives the number of tropical cyclone warnings for shipping issued by the Hong Kong Observatory in 2018, the durations of these warnings and the times of issue of the first and last warnings for all tropical cyclones in Hong Kong's area of responsibility (i.e. the area bounded by 10°N, 30°N, 105°E and 125°E). Times are given in hours and minutes in UTC. TABLE 4.3 presents a summary of the occasions/durations of the issuing of tropical cyclone warning signals in 2018. The sequence of the signals displayed and the number of tropical cyclone warning bulletins issued for each tropical cyclone are also given.
    [Show full text]
  • El Niño Watch Highlights for Hawaii and the U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands
    Hawaii and U.S. Quarterly Climate Impacts and Outlook Affiliated Pacific Islands November 2018 Significant Events – For August 2018-October 2018 Hurricane Lane and Tropical Storm Olivia affected the Hawaiian Four typhoons Islands. affected Guam and Very wet CNMI this quarter. conditions across northern RMI. Abnormally dry conditions developing in Yap and Palau. Mass coral bleaching in parts of the Central Pacifc. Above normal rains in American Samoa. Shading indicates each Island’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). El Niño Watch Highlights for Hawaii and the U.S. Affiliated Pacific Islands • Super Typhoon Yutu made a direct hit on Tinian and Saipan in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana’s this quarter with maximum sustained winds over 180 mph; highest winds to affect any U.S. territory since 1935. • Super Typhoon Jebi made a direct hit the northernmost islands in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana’s this quarter. • Typhoon Mangkhut brought torrential rains to Guam as it passed over Rota in the CNMI. • Hurricane Lane, a Category 5 storm at its peak, came within 40 miles of Honolulu, Hawaii this quarter. All islands received above normal rainfall, especially the Big Island. • Significant rainfall has also fallen across the Republic of the Marshall Islands this quarter while abnormally dry conditions have developed in the western parts of the Federated States of Micronesia. • Sea-levels in parts of the Federated States of Micronesia, Yap, and Guam have fallen dramatically this quarter in response to the developing El Niño. • “Taimasa”, a Samoan word meaning stinky low tides, were observed in American Samoa. John Marra ([email protected]) Michael Kruk ([email protected]) http://apdrc.soest.hawaii.edu/Hawaii_USAPI_Climate_Summary/dashboard Climate Overview – For August 2018–October 2018 The 1 November Niño 3.4 region anomaly was +1.1°C, but the overall coupled ocean-atmosphere system reflects ENSO neutral.
    [Show full text]