DOCSLIB.ORG

East Midlands Aggregates Working Party: Annual Report 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report of Annual Survey 2011 EAST MIDLANDS AGGREGATES WORKING PARTY REPORT OF ANNUAL SURVEY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2011 CHAIR: Lonek Wojtulewicz, Head of Planning, Historic and Natural Environment, Community Services Department, Leicestershire County Council County Offices, Glenfield, Leicester, LE3 8RJ Tel: 0116 3057040 TECHNICAL SECRETARY: Ian Thomas, Director, assisted by Karen Down, National Stone Centre, Porter Lane, Wirksworth, Derbyshire, DE4 4LS Tel: 01629 824833 The statistics and statements contained in this report are based on information from a large number of third party sources and are compiled to an appropriate level of accuracy and verification. Readers should use corroborative data before making major decisions based on this information. This publications is also available electronically free of charge on www.communities.gov.uk and www.nationalstonecentre.org.uk . E&OE EMAWP2011Report June 25, 2013 2 2011 REPORT CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. Introduction 4 2. National and Regional Aggregates Planning 5 3. Monitoring Landbanks 7 4. Monitoring Planning Decisions 14 5. Development Plans 16 6. Sustainable Aggregate Supplies 18 7. Recycling and Secondary Aggregates 20 8. Marine Sources 21 9. Research 22 TABLES IN TEXT PAGES Table 1a & 1b Assumptions in Guidance about provision 2001-2016 & 2005-2020 5&6 Table 2a Apportionment of Regional Guidelines 2001-2016 7 Table 2b Apportionment of Regional Guidelines 2005-2020 8 Table 3 Sales for Aggregate Purposes 2005-2011 11 Table 4a Landbanks for Crushed Rock Aggregates as at 31 December 2011 12 Table 4b Land banks for Sand & Gravel Aggregates as at 31 December 2011 13 Table 9 Summary of Planning Status of Aggregate Applications Expressed as Tonnages 2011 15 APPENDICES App. 1. Membership of EMAWP 2011 App. 2. Abbreviations App. 3. List of Active and Inactive 2011 Survey sites App. 4. Active Recycled and Secondary Aggregate Producers in 2011 TABLES IN APPENDICES Table 5a Sand and Gravel Sales 2011 Table 5b Subdivision of 5a for Sub Areas 2011 Table 6a Rock Sales 2011 Table 6b Subdivision of Table 6a for Non-Aggregate Sales 2011 Table 7a Sand and Gravel Reserves as at 31 December 2011 Table 7b Subdivision of Table 7a for Sub Areas 2011 Table 8 Rock Reserves as at 31 December 2011 Table 8a Rock Reserves for Aggregate Uses as at 31 December 2011 Table 8b Rock Reserves for Non-Aggregate Uses and Building Stone 2011 Published on behalf of the East Midlands Aggregates Working Party by The National Stone Centre EMAWP2011Report June 25, 2013 3 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The East Midlands Aggregates Working Party (EMAWP) was established in 1974. It is not a policy-making body, but is charged with data collection to facilitate planning by Mineral Planning Authorities (MPAs), national government agencies and the industry, and to inform the general reader. 1.2 In recent years it also informed the work of regional bodies on minerals, including Regional Assembly and its replacement East Midlands Leaders’ Board as well as the East Midlands Development Agency. These bodies were in the process of abolition in 2011 and as part of this a number of private-sector led Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPS) are being established. There are seven LEPs that have key operations within the area and their relationship with the EMAWP will develop as they become fully operational 1.3 The membership of EMAWP comprises officers of each of the MPAs, representatives of three industry trade associations the Mineral Products Association (MPA), the British Aggregates Association (BAA) and the Federation of Demolition Contractors, and officers of the Department of Communities and Local Government (CLG). 1.4 EMAWP's brief covers the East Midlands Planning Cluster, i.e. the counties of Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Northamptonshire, Nottinghamshire and Rutland and the cities of Derby, Leicester and Nottingham. It also includes the whole of the Peak District National Park (which incorporates areas within Sheffield, Barnsley, Kirklees, Oldham, Cheshire East and Staffordshire – historically these areas have previously been assigned to other regions). Each of these is an MPA. 1.5 Within the boundaries of the three city unitary authorities of Derby, Leicester and Nottingham, there are no active aggregate operations. It has therefore been agreed that each should appoint a ‘corresponding member’ who is kept informed of developments and who may wish to attend meetings when items of relevance to their authorities are discussed. 1.6 This report of survey relates to the findings of the 2011 survey. 1.7 Between March 2011 and March 2013 there was no DCLG contract to provide Technical Secretarial services to the EMAWP. During this time Leicestershire County Council voluntarily managed the EMAWP, undertook the collection and collation of sales and other data for 2010 and 2011and prepared a report for 2010. Sincere thanks for the provision of this invaluable service are extended to Leicestershire County Council and the Officers involved in the work. Their commitment means that a full historic series of sales and other data remains available which is particularly important in view of the changing economic conditions during the period. 1.8 Although sales data was collected for 2011 it was collated only at MPA level. Following new contracts being let in March 2013 a decision was taken to prepare a brief report of the 2011 survey, comprising mainly primary aggregate sales, reserve and landbank statistics together with a summary of planning applications and decisions made during the year. The reason for this approach was to ensure a rapid collation and publication of this key data. A very brief commentary has been prepared to accompany the tabulated results. 1.9 The annual report for 2012 will include narrative for 2012 on matters such as development plans, production and market influences and recycled and secondary aggregate production and use. EMAWP2011Report June 25, 2013 4 Meetings 1.10 The Working Party did not meet during 2011. EMAWP2011Report June 25, 2013 5 2. NATIONAL AND REGIONAL AGGREGATES PLANNING 2.1 Minerals Planning Statement1 (MPS 1) published in November 2006 set out the current national and regional framework for minerals planning and the provision of aggregates in 2011. This was supplemented by revised National and Regional Guidelines for Aggregates Provision in England 2001-2016 published on 10th June 2003. The levels of provision set out in the Guidelines are summarised in Table 1a. On 29 June 2009 a further revision to the Guidelines was published by DCLG for the period 2005-2020. The levels of provision set out in the latest Guidelines are summarised in Table 1b. Sub-Regional Provision 2.2 Each of the English Aggregates Working Parties was asked to produce regional guidelines indicating how the demand identified in the 2003 Guidelines could be met from sources within each region. The exercise was repeated for the 2009 Guidelines. 2.3 The sub-regional apportionment of the 2003 guidelines, prepared by EMAWP, was agreed by EMRA on 19th February 2004. The details of these sub-regional apportionments are set out in Table 2a. The sub-regional apportionment of the 2009 Guidelines, prepared by EMAWP and set out in Table 2b, was recommended to EMRA in December 2009 and endorsed by EMRA in January 2010 for inclusion into draft replacement Regional Plan Policies. However, owing to significant changes to regional government, including the abolition of EMRA, the closure of the Regional Government Office and the Secretary of State’s announcement of the intention to abolish Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS) it was never incorporated into a published document as part of the Development Plan. Nevertheless, the apportionments carry weight as material considerations and, in the interim, will be taken into account when calculating landbanks by EMAWP and the MPAs TABLE 1a: National and Regional Guidelines for Aggregates Provision in England, 2001 –2016 (Mt) Guidelines for land-won Assumptions production in Region New Regions Land–won Land-won Marine Alternative Net Mt. Sand & Crushed Sand & Materials Imports to Gravel Rock Gravel (a) England South East 212 35 120 118 85 England London 19 0 53 82 6 East of England 256 8 32 110 8 East Midlands 165 523 0 95 0 West Midlands 162 93 0 88 16 South West 106 453 9 121 4 North West 55 167 4 101 50 Yorkshire & the 73 220 3 128 0 Humber North East 20 119 9 76 0 England 1068 1618 230 919 169 EMAWP2011Report June 25, 2013 6 Source: National and Regional Guidelines for Aggregates Provision in England, 2001 – 2016. June 2003 (a) aggregate materials other than land or marine won TABLE 1b: National and Regional Guidelines for Aggregates Provision in England, 2005 –2020 (Mt) Guidelines for land-won Assumptions production in Region New Regions Land–won Land-won Marine Alternative Net Mt. Sand & Crushed Sand & Materials Imports to Gravel Rock Gravel (a) England South East 195 25 121 130 31 England London 18 0 72 95 12 East of England 236 8 14 117 7 East Midlands 174 500 0 110 0 West Midlands 165 82 0 100 23 South West 85 412 12 142 5 North West 52 154 15 117 55 Yorkshire & the 78 212 5 133 3 Humber North East 24 99 20 50 0 England 1028 1492 259 993 136 Source: National and Regional Guidelines for Aggregates Provision in England, 2005 – 2020. June 2009 (a) aggregate materials other than land or marine won EMAWP2011Report June 25, 2013 7 Table 2a: APPORTIONMENT OF EAST MIDLANDS REGIONAL GUIDELINES 2001 – 2016 2001 – 2016 (a) CRUSHED ROCK (c) Mt Annual Provision (b) Limestone & Dolomite Derbys 153.7 9.61 PDNP 66.9 4.18 Leics/Rutland 25.6 1.6 Lincs 27.2 1.7 Northants 6.3 0.39 Notts 4.2 0.26 Sub Total 283.9 17.74 Igneous Rock Derbys/Leics 236.9(d) 14.8 (d) Sub Total 236.9 14.8 Sandstone Derbys/PDNP 2.18 0.136 Sub Total 2.18 0.136 Total Rock 523 32.68 SAND & GRAVEL Derbys 26.5 1.66 PDNP Leics 20.0 1.25 Lincs 49.0 3.06 Northants 15.5 0.97 Notts 54.0 3.37 Total Sand & Gravel 165.0 10.31 TOTAL AGGREGATES 688.0 42.99 (a) Total derived from Guidelines for Aggregates Provision (2003) N.B.
Recommended publications
  • Report of Annual Survey 2013

    Report of Annual Survey 2013

    DRAFTD Report of Annual Survey 2013 EAST MIDLANDS AGGREGATES WORKING PARTY REPORT OF ANNUAL SURVEY FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2013 CHAIR: Lonek Wojtulewicz, Head of Planning, Historic and Natural Environment, Community Services Department, Leicestershire County Council County Offices, Glenfield, Leicester, LE3 8RJ Tel: 0116 3057040 TECHNICAL SECRETARY: Ian Thomas, assisted by Karen Down, National Stone Centre, Porter Lane, Wirksworth, Derbyshire, DE4 4LS Tel: 01629 824833 The statistics and statements contained in this report are based on information from a large number of third party sources and are compiled to an appropriate level of accuracy and verification. Readers should use corroborative data before making major decisions based on this information. This publications is also available electronically free of charge on www.communities.gov.uk and www.nationalstonecentre.org.uk . E&OE EMAWP2013Report December 3, 2014 2 2013 REPORT CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. Introduction 4 2. National and Local Aggregates Planning 5 3. Monitoring Landbanks 8 4. Monitoring Planning Decisions 20 5. Development Plans 24 6. Production and Market Influences 28 7. Sustainable Aggregate Supplies 31 8. Recycling and Secondary Aggregates 33 9. Marine Sources 38 10. Research 39 TABLES IN TEXT PAGES Table 1 Assumptions in Guidance about provision 2005-2020 6 Table 2 Apportionment of Regional Guidelines 2005-2020 7 Table 3 & 3a Sales for Aggregate Purposes 2004-2013 11&12 Table 4a Landbanks for Crushed Rock Aggregates as at 31 December 2013 16 Table 4b Landbanks for Sand & Gravel Aggregates as at 31 December 2013 17 Table 9 Summary of Planning Status of Aggregate Applications expressed 23 as Tonnages 2013 Preparation of Local Aggregate Assessments 26 Key Milestones for Minerals and Waste Plans in East Midlands, Sept.
  • Derbyshire and Derby Minerals Plan

    Derbyshire and Derby Minerals Plan

    CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 4 Background 4 Spatial Context 7 National and Sub-National Aggregate Guidelines 8 2. AGGREGATE RESOURCES 9 Primary Aggregates 9 Secondary and Recycled Aggregates 10 3. ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL RESERVES & PRODUCTION 12 Sand & Gravel Resources & Reserves 12 Recent Production 15 Crushed Rock Resources & Reserves 17 Recent Production 21 Secondary & Recycled Aggregates 23 4. CALCULATING FUTURE PROVISION OF AGGREGATES 25 Future Provision of Sand & Gravel 25 Recent sales 25 Imports and Exports 25 Marine Won Sand and Gravel 27 Supply from adjacent areas 27 Future Economic Growth 28 Conclusions 31 Future Provision of Crushed Rock 33 Recent sales 33 Imports and Exports 33 Supply from adjacent areas 36 Future Economic Growth 36 Progressive Reduction in Quarrying in the Peak Park 37 Conclusions 38 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Permitted sand and gravel quarries in Derbyshire 12 Table 2: Sales of sand and gravel in Derbyshire 2006-2015 15 Table 3: Use of sand and gravel 2015 15 Table 4: Active hard rock quarries in Derbyshire & Peak District 19 Table 5: Permitted but inactive hard rock quarries in Derbyshire & the Peak District 20 Table 6: Sales of aggregate crushed rock 2006-2015 22 Table 7: Use of crushed rock 2015 22 Table 8: Distribution of Sand and Gravel from Derbyshire, 2009 26 Table 9: Distribution of Crushed Rock from Derbyshire and Peak District 34 Quarries, 2009 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Derbyshire, Derby and the Peak District National Park 7 Figure 2: Sand and gravel resources in Derby and Derbyshire 14 Figure 3: Sales of sand and gravel in Derbyshire 2006-2015 against past and current provision rate 16 Figure 4: Limestone resources in Derbyshire & the Peak District 18 Figure 5: Sales of aggregate crushed rock 2006-2015 against past and current provision rate 22 Figure 6: Crushed rock inter-regional flows 2009 35 Cover photos: Tunstead and Old Moor Quarry, Buxton and Swarkestone Quarry, Barrow upon Trent 3 1.
  • Mercian 2013 B.Indd

    Mercian 2013 B.Indd

    Former workings in Jurassic ironstone near Grantham Geoffrey Warrington Abstract: The Lower Jurassic Marlstone Rock Formation was formerly worked for ironstone near Denton (SE Lincolnshire), and the Middle Jurassic Northampton Sand Formation near Hungerton and Colsterworth (SE Lincolnshire) and Saltby (NE Leicestershire), southwest and south of Grantham. Two ammonites from the Northampton Sand Formation at Hungerton are illustrated. Four ironstone quarries near Grantham (Fig. 1) were below the Whitby Mudstone Formation (formerly Upper visited during an excursion from the British Association Lias). The ironstone, a slightly calcareous sideritic ore, meeting in Nottingham in 1966. One, at Denton Park in was greenish-black when unweathered, and whitish or SE Lincolnshire, was worked for the Marlstone Rock grey-brown when weathered. Cross-bedding indicated Formation (Upper Pliensbachian – Toarcian; formerly an easterly transport direction, similar to that recorded the Marlstone Rock Bed). The others, at Colsterworth and Hungerton in SE Lincolnshire and Saltby in NE Leicestershire, were worked for the Northampton Sand Formation (Aalenian; formerly the Northampton Sand Ironstone Formation). The lithostratigraphic nomenclature follows Cox et al. (1999) and Carney et al. (2004), with equivalents used in older literature given in parenthesis at the first mention. The Denton and Hungerton sites are now infilled, but exposures remained at Colsterworth and Saltby in 2008. Photographs taken in 1966 record a once- important extractive industry in its last years. (All grid references cited below are [SK]). Denton Park Pit, in Marlstone Rock The history of working at Denton Park [857317], the most easterly of the quarries in this formation in the Woolsthorpe area, was documented by Tonks (1992).
  • Walk 9 - a Walk to the Past

    Walk 9 - a Walk to the Past

    Woodhall Spa Walks No 9 Walk 9 - A walk to the past Start from Royal Square - Grid Reference: TF 193631 Approx 1 hour This route takes the walker to the ruins of Kirkstead Abbey, (dissolved by Henry VIII over 300 years before Woodhall Spa came into being) and the little 13th Century Church of St Leonards. From Royal Square, take the Witham Road, towards the river, passing shops and houses until fields open out to your left. Soon after, look for the entrance to Abbey Lane (to the left). Follow this narrow lane. You will eventually cross the Beck (see also walks 6 and 7) as it approaches the river; the monks from the Abbey once re-routed it to obtain drinking water. Ahead, on the right, is Kirkstead Old Hall, which dates from the 17th Century. Following the land, you cannot miss the Abbey ruin ahead. All that remains now is part of the Abbey Church, but under the humps and bumps of the field are other remains that have yet to be properly excavated, though a brief exploration before the laqst war revealed some of the magnificence of the Cistercian Abbey. Beyond is the superb little Church of St Leonards ( the patron saint of prisoners), believed to have been built as a Chantry Chapel and used by travellers and local inhabitants. The Cistercians were great agriculturalists and wool from the Abbey lands commanded a high price for its quality. A whole community of craftsmen and labourers would have grown up around the Abbey as iut gained lands and power.
  • Home Farm Duddington Estate Duddington Northamptonshire

    Home Farm Duddington Estate Duddington Northamptonshire

    HOME FARM DUDDINGTON ESTATE DUDDINGTON NORTHAMPTONSHIRE HOME FARM DUDDINGTON ESTATE DUDDINGTON NORTHAMPTONSHIRE Stamford 5 miles; Peterborough 14 miles; Kettering 18 miles; Leicester 27 miles For Sale as a Whole or in 3 Lots An attractive and substantial block of productive and well-maintained mixed farmland with river frontage within the Welland Valley is offered for sale with entitlements. The disposal of the farmland is part of the complete dispersal sale of the Duddington Estate, which has been developed by the Jackson family for over 400 years. LOT 7 Mixed block of permanent pasture and fertile arable land approximately 125 acres LOT 8 A highly productive block of elevated arable land of approximately 201 acres LOT 9 A single parcel of arable land of 10.69 acres In all about 337 acres (136 ha) Situation The land surrounds the picturesque and historic village of Duddington where the counties of Rutland and north east Northamptonshire converge in the valley of the River Welland. Duddington has excellent road communications, as it is bordered by both the A43 and A47. The historic market town of Stamford is 5 miles to the north and the A1 motorway is only 6 miles to the east, both giving excellent access to London and beyond. Lot 7: A mixed block of valley bottom permanent grazing pasture and fertile arable land totalling approximately 125 acres. The land is accessed off the A43 and is bordered by the River Welland. The pasture land has a mains water feed. Lot 8: A highly productive block of elevated arable land of approximately 201 acres.
  • Rushton Landfill, Oakley Road, Rushton Supporting Statement

    Rushton Landfill, Oakley Road, Rushton Supporting Statement

    Proposed Extension to the Waste Reception Building & Construction of a Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) Facility and Concrete Batching Plant Rushton Landfill, Oakley Road, Rushton Supporting Statement Rev. April 2014 Supporting statement Storefield Lodge April 2014 Contents 1. Proposed site operations .............................................................................................................. 1 2. Design and Access Statement ....................................................................................................... 8 3. Planning Policy Statement .......................................................................................................... 10 Appendices Appendix 1 – Plans R14/13/01b R14/13/02 R14/13/03 Appendix 2 – Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Crestwood Environmental Appendix 3 – Flood Risk Assessment White Young Green i Supporting statement Storefield Lodge April 2014 1. PROPOSED SITE OPERATIONS 1.1. Planning consent for the landfill site at Storefield Lodge, Rushton was originally granted in 1989. In 2008 Mick George Ltd (MGL) acquired an interest in the site and in November 2008 was granted consent to establish a building to undertake waste recycling operations undercover on the site (Consent No 08/00069/WAS). 1.2. Subsequent planning consents have been granted on the site the last being for a northern extension to the landfill facility being granted in November 2011 (Consent No 11/00046/WAS). 1.3. It is now proposed to extend the existing Waste Reception Building close to the site access in a northern direction, to the same height and design (including colour and cladding) as the existing building (c. 10m high to the eaves and c. 12m high to the ridgeline), in order to expand the current waste pre-treatment and sorting operations to meet demand and aid efficiency of operations. A second weighbridge will also be established for greater efficiency of site operations and a new wheel bath facility included.
  • The Welland Valley Partnership River Improvement Plan

    The Welland Valley Partnership River Improvement Plan

    The Welland Valley Partnership Enhancing the River Welland Our invitation to support a new vision for the local environment January 2013 Foreword The Welland Valley Partnership - Working Together for a Better River The River Welland arises above Market Harborough and flows through the gently rolling countryside of Northamptonshire, Leicestershire and Rutland until it reaches Stamford where it is one of the features that makes the town so attractive. Below Stamford the River continues on its way to Market Deeping and Spalding, where its character changes and the water slows down to become one of the four fenland rivers which drain the Fens and finally enter the Wash. People have relied on the Rivers for thousands of years for water, food, transport and energy; as a result the River Welland and its valley have changed enormously. Even the course of the River Welland has moved; it used to flow through the Trinity Bridge in Crowland, but now runs almost a mile away and the bridge is a dry monument in the centre of the town. Figure 1: Trinity Bridge at Crowland. This triangular bridge once provided a crossing place over two channels of the River Welland. (©Dave Hitchborne and licensed for reuse under the Creative Commons Licence) 1: Trinity Bridge at While many of these changes have been beneficial, such as the creation of water meadows which were an important feature of the English countryside, others have had unintended side effects. For example, land drainage and the extensive dredging of the River upstream of Stamford have left us with an over-widened and over-deepened channel with little of its historic character.
  • The Northern Clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Daltazin@Lsu.Edu

    The Northern Clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The northern clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Altazin, Keith, "The northern clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 543. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/543 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE NORTHERN CLERGY AND THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Keith Altazin B.S., Louisiana State University, 1978 M.A., Southeastern Louisiana University, 2003 August 2011 Acknowledgments The completion of this dissertation would have not been possible without the support, assistance, and encouragement of a number of people. First, I would like to thank the members of my doctoral committee who offered me great encouragement and support throughout the six years I spent in the graduate program. I would especially like thank Dr. Victor Stater for his support throughout my journey in the PhD program at LSU. From the moment I approached him with my ideas on the Pilgrimage of Grace, he has offered extremely helpful advice and constructive criticism.
  • Welland Valley Route Market Harborough to Peterborough Feasibility Study

    Welland Valley Route Market Harborough to Peterborough Feasibility Study

    Welland Valley Route Market Harborough to Peterborough feasibility study Draft March 2014 Table of contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction and Background Sustrans makes smarter travel choices possible, desirable and inevitable. We’re 2 Route Description a leading UK charity enabling people to travel by foot, bike or public transport for 3 Alternative Route more of the journeys we make every day. We work with families, communities, policy- 4 Route Design makers and partner organisations so that people are able to choose healthier, cleaner 5 Ecology and cheaper journeys, with better places 6 Summary and spaces to move through and live in. It’s time we all began making smarter travel choices. Make your move and support Appendix A – Land Ownership Sustrans today. www.sustrans.org.uk Head Office Sustrans 2 Cathedral Square College Green Bristol - Binding Margin - BS1 5DD Registered Charity No. 326550 (England and Wales) SC039263 (Scotland) VAT Registration No. 416740656 Contains map data (c) www.openstreetmap.org (and) contributors, licence CC-BY-SA (www.creativecommons.org) REPORT INTENDED TO BE PRINTED IN FULL COLOUR ON A3 SIZE PAPER Page 2 l Welland Valley Route, Market Harborough to Peterborough Feasibility Study Welland Valley Railway Path Exisinting National Cycle Network minor road routes Executive summary the key constraint along most of the route. The exception to this is where the line of the railway This report represents the findings of a study to has been broken by the removal of bridges at examine proposals to introduce a cycle route crossing points of roads or water courses. A along the line of the former London Midland final physical constraint (two locations) occurs Scottish Railway from Market Harborough to where the track bed under road bridges has Peterborough.
  • Derbyshire and Derby Minerals Plan

    Derbyshire and Derby Minerals Plan

    DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL, DERBY CITY COUNCIL AND THE PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK LOCAL AGGREGATES ASSESSMENT DRAFT MARCH 2013 CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 4 Background 4 Spatial Context 6 National and Sub-National Aggregate Guidelines 7 2. AGGREGATE RESOURCES 8 Primary Aggregates 8 Secondary and Recycled Aggregates 9 3. ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL RESERVES & PRODUCTION 11 Sand & Gravel Resources & Reserves 11 Recent Production 13 Crushed Rock Resources & Reserves 14 Recent Production 17 4. CALCULATING FUTURE PROVISION OF AGGREGATES 19 Future Provision of Sand & Gravel 19 Recent sales 19 National and Sub National Guidelines 19 Imports and Exports 20 Marine Won Sand and Gravel 21 Secondary and Recycled Aggregates 21 Future Economic Growth 23 Conclusions 24 Future Provision of Crushed Rock 26 Recent sales 26 National and Sub National Guidelines 26 Imports and Exports 27 Secondary & Recycled Aggregates 29 Future Economic Growth 31 Progressive Reduction in Quarrying in the Peak Park 32 Conclusions 33 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Permitted sand and gravel quarries in Derbyshire 11 Table 2: Sales of sand and gravel in Derbyshire 2002-2011 13 Table 3: Active hard rock quarries in Derbyshire & Peak District 16 Table 4: Permitted but inactive hard rock quarries in Derbyshire & Peak District 16 Table 5: Sales of aggregate crushed rock 2002-2011 18 Table 6: Distribution of Sand and Gravel from Derbyshire, 2009 20 Table 7: Distribution of Crushed Rock from Derbyshire and Peak District 28 Quarries, 2009 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Derbyshire, Derby and the Peak District National Park 6 Figure 2: Sand and gravel resources in Derby and Derbyshire 12 Figure 3: Sales of sand and gravel in Derbyshire 2002-2011 against past and current apportionment level 14 Figure 4: Limestone resources in Derbyshire & Peak District 15 Figure 5: Sales of aggregate crushed rock 2002-2011 against past and current apportionment level 18 Figure 6: Crushed rock inter-regional flows 2009 27 Cover photo: Tunstead and Old Moor Quarry, Buxton 3 1.
  • Northamptonshire Archaeology

    Northamptonshire Archaeology

    Northamptonshire Archaeology An archaeological desk-based assessment of land at the Buccleuch Academy Kettering, Northamptonshire Northamptonshire Archaeology 2 Bolton House Wootton Hall Park Northampton NN4 8BE t. 01604 700493 f. 01604 702822 e. [email protected] Charlotte Walker w. www.northantsarchaeology.co.uk Report 10/161 October 2010 WEEKLEY GLEBE ROAD, KETTERING STAFF Project Manager Stephen Parry MA FSA MIfA Text Charlotte Walker BSc AIfA Illustrations Charlotte Walker QUALITY CONTROL Print name Signed Date Checked by P Chapman Verified and approved by A Chapman Northamptonshire Archaeology 10/161 WEEKLEY GLEBE ROAD, KETTERING OASIS REPORT FORM PROJECT DETAILS Project title Archaeological desk-based assessment of land at the Buccleuch Academy, Kettering, Northamptonshire Short description Northamptonshire Archaeology conducted an archaeological desk-based assessment of land at Weekley Glebe Road, Kettering, Northamptonshire. The site is currently occupied by the former Montagu School, now known as the Buccleuch Academy. Many of the current buildings will be demolished and a new academy built to the east of the current school site.The Roman town of Kettering lies just to the west of the site. Much of the town has been destroyed by quarrying and modern housing developments and little is known about the form of the town. Ironworking appears to have been a principal part of the economy and there are numerous quarry pits and ironworking sites, some of which lie adjacent to the current development area. The south-western corner of the site has been identified as having potentially national archaeological importance. The town is not thought to extend much further westwards into the remainder of the site.The Cytringan Saxon Charter Boundary lies to the south of the site and may extend into it; the boundary may have been formed by a double ditch and central bank.
  • Peak District National Park Visitor Survey 2005

    Peak District National Park Visitor Survey 2005

    PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK VISITOR SURVEY 2005 Performance Review and Research Service www.peakdistrict.gov.uk Peak District National Park Authority Visitor Survey 2005 Member of the Association of National Park Authorities (ANPA) Aldern House Baslow Road Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1AE Tel: (01629) 816 200 Text: (01629) 816 319 Fax: (01629) 816 310 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.peakdistrict.gov.uk Your comments and views on this Report are welcomed. Comments and enquiries can be directed to Sonia Davies, Research Officer on 01629 816 242. This report is accessible from our website, located under ‘publications’. We are happy to provide this information in alternative formats on request where reasonable. ii Acknowledgements Grateful thanks to Chatsworth House Estate for allowing us to survey within their grounds; Moors for the Future Project for their contribution towards this survey; and all the casual staff, rangers and office based staff in the Peak District National Park Authority who have helped towards the collection and collation of the information used for this report. iii Contents Page 1. Introduction 1.1 The Peak District National Park 1 1.2 Background to the survey 1 2. Methodology 2.1 Background to methodology 2 2.2 Location 2 2.3 Dates 3 2.4 Logistics 3 3. Results: 3.1 Number of people 4 3.2 Response rate and confidence limits 4 3.3 Age 7 3.4 Gender 8 3.5 Ethnicity 9 3.6 Economic Activity 11 3.7 Mobility 13 3.8 Group Size 14 3.9 Group Type 14 3.10 Groups with children 16 3.11 Groups with disability 17 3.12