GEOPARKS/WORLD HERITAGE in IMPACT STRUCTURES 4:15 P.M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GEOPARKS/WORLD HERITAGE in IMPACT STRUCTURES 4:15 P.M Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution IV (2008) sess204.pdf Tuesday, August 19, 2008 GEOPARKS/WORLD HERITAGE IN IMPACT STRUCTURES 4:15 p.m. Hippo Room Chair: Uwe Reimold 4:15 p.m. Gibson R. L. * Blom M. Geotourism Potential of the Vredefort Dome, South Africa - Challenges, Opportunities, Progess and Recommendations [#3112] The Vredefort Dome is a 90-km-wide geological entity located ~120 km southwest of Johannesburg, South Africa, that represents the eroded central uplift of the world's oldest and possible largest known meteorite impact structure. 4:30 p.m. Stöffler D. Pösges G. * Barfeld R. Development of Geotourism in the National Geopark Ries, Southern Germany [#3070] The Geopark Ries devoted to the Ries impact crater is currently under development. The Geopark covers an area of 1800 km2 comprising a total of 53 communities. The Ries has been certified as a national geopark in May 2006. 4:45 p.m. Barnardo D. J. * The Role of the Geological Society of South Africa in Promoting the Establishment of Africa's First Geopark at the Tswaing Meteorite Impact Crater [#3111] The Geological Society of South Africa (GSSA) has a Conservation and Tourism Committee as part of its activities. Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution IV (2008) sess204.pdf3112.pdf GEOTOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE VREDEFORT DOME, SOUTH AFRICA – CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, PROGRESS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. R.L. Gibson1 and M. Blom2, 1Impact Cratering Research Group, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, P/Bag 3, P O WITS, Johannesburg 2050, South Af- rica, [email protected]; 2Fezile Dabi District Municipality, Box 10, Sasolburg 1947, South Africa. Introduction: The Vredefort Dome is a 90-km-wide features requires lengthy explanation if first-time visi- geological entity located ~120 km southwest of Johan- tors are to build an understanding of the Vredefort nesburg, South Africa, that represents the eroded cen- impact event. Logistically, the fact that 89% of the tral uplift of the world’s oldest (2023 ± 4 Ma) and pos- land in the WHS is privately owned, with many absen- sibly largest known meteorite impact structure. It is a tee owners, creates a challenge for access to key sites, site of unprecedented geological significance not only as well as issues such as accident liability. because of the impact-related effects visible in its Progress: Following the WHS inscription in 2005, rocks, but also because it is one of only a handful of provincial and district and local municipal structures areas around the world that exposes a near-continuous, have embarked on several projects aimed at enhancing >25 km deep, crustal section. the geotourism potential of the VDWHS and the larger The topographic expression of the dome is restricted dome region, including a 3-year roads programme to its northern and western sectors (the remainder be- aimed at upgrading much of the 145 km of gravel road ing covered by younger sedimentary strata), with the in the WHS. A Strategic Environmental Assessment most prominent feature being a crescent of steep ridges (2006) and an Integrated Management Plan (2007) and valleys cut by the Vaal River. The combination of were completed for the North West and Free State the spectacular rugged scenery and the Vaal River has Province governments, respectively. These assess- created a well-established tourism industry that is pri- ments have considered the VDWHS holistically, ex- marily focussed on recreational and adventure tourism amining other resources (archaeological, cultural, bio- and the business market. By contrast, geotourism diversity) and other challenges to development and linked to the spectacular geological features is rela- management of the natural resources, including pollu- tively minor, being restricted to a few information dis- tion, access, communication and socio-economic and plays in resorts and ad hoc tours run by local enthusi- legal aspects. The Free State government has spon- asts and academics. In 2005, a 30000 ha portion of the sored additional projects aimed at addressing some of dome (approximately one-quarter of the exposed area the challenges presented by the geology of the dome. of the dome) was inscribed as a World Heritage Site These include the distribution of information pam- (VDWHS) on the strength of the dome’s internatonal phlets and accompanying posters outlining the geo- geological significance. logical features that are freely available to visitors and Challenges: The most significant challenges to the locals (in English, Afrikaans and Sesotho), and a development of the geotourism potential of the Vrede- summary brochure outlining the main conclusions of fort Dome relate to its immense size and the deep lev- the 2000-page Integrated Management Plan, as well as els of erosion, and to the land ownership profile in the posters for public display. A geological guidebook and dome. In the first instance, the large size presents an audiovisual presentation are also planned. The Fezile interpretive challenge as visitors cannot drive or walk Dabi District Municipality has built a Visitor and Geo- up to a single viewpoint from which they can see the logical Interpretation Centre outside Vredefort town entire structure, such as is possible, for instance, at that, once completed in 2009, will address the chal- Tswaing crater. Second, large distances may need to lenges of explaining to visitors the problems of scale be travelled between different geosites, which makes it and erosion depth that characterise the Vredefort im- difficult for the visitor to maintain perspective. The pact structure as well as showcasing other geological deep levels of erosion also create confusion about the features of the dome. This centre will also provide a size of the feature – the crescent of hills defining the hub for the development of local crafts industries, Vredefort Mountainland is commonly confused with thereby allowing economic upliftment through small the crater rim because visitors are looking for a classic enterprise development, and should become a key bowl-shaped crater. Whereas previously the Vredefort tourism site in its own right. Dome was often mistaken as the Vredefort crater, ad- Recommendations: Several key initiatives have al- ditional confusion has arisen recently among visitors ready been set in motion to address the dissemination who equate the WHS area with the Vredefort crater. of information concerning the geological heritage re- The deep levels of erosion, which have completely sources of the Vredefort Dome. One of the acknowl- removed the crater topography and most of the tell-tale edgements of the IMP is that the selection of only a breccias and impact deposits, also mean that any ex- small portion of the dome as a WHS (for historical as planation of the geological significance of particular well as logistical reasons) presents new management Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution IV (2008) sess204.pdf3112.pdf challenges, and the possibility of creating a UNESCO trained museum and field guides and educational offi- Geopark covering the rest of the dome and several key cers) will create additional benefits. geosites presently outside of the VDWHS must receive Aside from the local and international tourism mar- serious consideration. Geotourism also needs to be ket, the Vredefort Dome is ideally placed to align itself managed within the context of the other attractions of as a first-choice destination for field school educa- the area. Specifically, the dome area contains a wide tional activities serving the highly populace Gauteng range of habitats that have promoted a broad floral region. At present, such activities involve a combina- biodiversity, and the re-introduction of large game tion of adventure activities (hiking, rafting, abseiling) animals by the tourism sector is strengthening the fau- with ecological awareness activities. By presenting a nal biodiversity once more. Additionally, the area con- combination of geological and cultural heritage-based tains a highly diverse archaeological and cultural- learning activities in addition to this standard format, a historical heritage, ranging from Stone Age San- more holistic educational programme can be presented Bushman petroglyphs and tool-making sites to exten- that will set it apart from its competition. sive Iron Age settlement ruins, traces of the earliest Conclusions: The Vredefort Dome is an area of su- European settler dwellings, an historic goldfield and perlative geology, rare scenic beauty, rich biodiversity several key sites related to the Anglo-Boer War of and cultural heritage that is located close to South Af- 1899-1900. In contrast to the geology, these resources rica’s major international gateway and largest popula- have received little attention from researchers and re- tion centre. Development and effective management of quire immediate attention so that suitable heritage sites its geological and other heritage resources as a tourism may be identified for tourism purposes. and educational resource has the potential to uplift an The private ownership of much of the land raises is- economically-depressed region and act as a flag-bearer sues of access to key geosites. The Management Au- for the development of other geological heritage re- thority will need to assess a variety of measures, in- sources in South Africa. A joint marketing initiative cluding purchase of land and facilitation of access (re- with the other principal tourist attractions of the Gau- aligning fences, stiles, gates); however, an alternative teng region (Cradle of Humankind, Origins Centre, that may need to be considered is the creation of road- Apartheid Museum) will strengthen its international side stops that allow easy access to visitors and that profile. can be arranged in a story format, with visitors pro- gressing from one stop to the next in a specific order. If placed strategically between proper outcrop geo- sites, these ‘artificial’ sites can allow visitors to learn about the geological aspects of the dome at the same time as enjoying scenic views and information about cultural and heritage resources.
Recommended publications
  • The Free State, South Africa
    Higher Education in Regional and City Development Higher Education in Regional and City Higher Education in Regional and City Development Development THE FREE STATE, SOUTH AFRICA The third largest of South Africa’s nine provinces, the Free State suffers from The Free State, unemployment, poverty and low skills. Only one-third of its working age adults are employed. 150 000 unemployed youth are outside of training and education. South Africa Centrally located and landlocked, the Free State lacks obvious regional assets and features a declining economy. Jaana Puukka, Patrick Dubarle, Holly McKiernan, How can the Free State develop a more inclusive labour market and education Jairam Reddy and Philip Wade. system? How can it address the long-term challenges of poverty, inequity and poor health? How can it turn the potential of its universities and FET-colleges into an active asset for regional development? This publication explores a range of helpful policy measures and institutional reforms to mobilise higher education for regional development. It is part of the series of the OECD reviews of Higher Education in Regional and City Development. These reviews help mobilise higher education institutions for economic, social and cultural development of cities and regions. They analyse how the higher education system T impacts upon regional and local development and bring together universities, other he Free State, South Africa higher education institutions and public and private agencies to identify strategic goals and to work towards them. CONTENTS Chapter 1. The Free State in context Chapter 2. Human capital and skills development in the Free State Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Idp Review 2020/21
    IDP REVIEW 2019/20 IDP REVIEW 2020/21 NGWATHE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IDP REVIEW 2020/21 POLITICAL LEADERSHIP CLLR MJ MOCHELA CLLR NP MOPEDI EXECUTIVE MAYOR SPEAKER WARD 1 WARD 2 WARD 3 WARD 4 CLLR MATROOS CLLR P NDAYI CLLR M MOFOKENG CLLR S NTEO WARD 5 WARD 8 WARD 6 WARD 7 CLLR R KGANTSE CLLR M RAPULENG CLLR M MAGASHULE CLLR M GOBIDOLO WARD 9 WARD 10 WARD 11 WARD 12 CLLR M MBELE CLLR M MOFOKENG CLLR N TLHOBELO CLLR A VREY WARD 13 WARD 14 WARD 15 WARD 16 CLLR H FIELAND CLLR R MEHLO CLLR MOFOKENG CLLR SOCHIVA WARD 17 WARD 18 CLLR M TAJE CLLR M TOYI 2 | P a g e NGWATHE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IDP REVIEW 2020/21 PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATIVE COUNCILLORS NAME & SURNAME PR COUNCILLORS POLITICAL PARTY Motlalepule Mochela PR ANC Neheng Mopedi PR ANC Mvulane Sonto PR ANC Matshepiso Mmusi PR ANC Mabatho Miyen PR ANC Maria Serathi PR ANC Victoria De Beer PR ANC Robert Ferendale PR DA Molaphene Polokoestsile PR DA Alfred Sehume PR DA Shirley Vermaack PR DA Carina Serfontein PR DA Arnold Schoonwinkel PR DA Pieter La Cock PR DA Caroline Tete PR EFF Bakwena Thene PR EFF Sylvia Radebe PR EFF Petrus Van Der Merwe PR VF 3 | P a g e NGWATHE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY IDP REVIEW 2020/21 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TOPIC PAGE NO Political Leadership 2-3 Proportional Representative Councillors 3 Table of Contents 4 List of Tables 5-6 Table of Figure 7 Foreword By Executive Mayor 8 Overview By Municipal Manager 9-11 Executive Summary 12-14 SECTION A Introduction and Current Reality 16 Political governance and administration SECTON B Profile of the municipality 20 SECTION C Spatial
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa)
    FREE STATE PROFILE (South Africa) Lochner Marais University of the Free State Bloemfontein, SA OECD Roundtable on Higher Education in Regional and City Development, 16 September 2010 [email protected] 1 Map 4.7: Areas with development potential in the Free State, 2006 Mining SASOLBURG Location PARYS DENEYSVILLE ORANJEVILLE VREDEFORT VILLIERS FREE STATE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT VILJOENSKROON KOPPIES CORNELIA HEILBRON FRANKFORT BOTHAVILLE Legend VREDE Towns EDENVILLE TWEELING Limited Combined Potential KROONSTAD Int PETRUS STEYN MEMEL ALLANRIDGE REITZ Below Average Combined Potential HOOPSTAD WESSELSBRON WARDEN ODENDAALSRUS Agric LINDLEY STEYNSRUST Above Average Combined Potential WELKOM HENNENMAN ARLINGTON VENTERSBURG HERTZOGVILLE VIRGINIA High Combined Potential BETHLEHEM Local municipality BULTFONTEIN HARRISMITH THEUNISSEN PAUL ROUX KESTELL SENEKAL PovertyLimited Combined Potential WINBURG ROSENDAL CLARENS PHUTHADITJHABA BOSHOF Below Average Combined Potential FOURIESBURG DEALESVILLE BRANDFORT MARQUARD nodeAbove Average Combined Potential SOUTPAN VERKEERDEVLEI FICKSBURG High Combined Potential CLOCOLAN EXCELSIOR JACOBSDAL PETRUSBURG BLOEMFONTEIN THABA NCHU LADYBRAND LOCALITY PLAN TWEESPRUIT Economic BOTSHABELO THABA PATSHOA KOFFIEFONTEIN OPPERMANSDORP Power HOBHOUSE DEWETSDORP REDDERSBURG EDENBURG WEPENER LUCKHOFF FAURESMITH houses JAGERSFONTEIN VAN STADENSRUST TROMPSBURG SMITHFIELD DEPARTMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT & HOUSING PHILIPPOLIS SPRINGFONTEIN Arid SPATIAL PLANNING DIRECTORATE ZASTRON SPATIAL INFORMATION SERVICES ROUXVILLE BETHULIE
    [Show full text]
  • Irongate House, Houndsditch EC3 Ruth Siddall Irongate
    Urban Geology in London No. 24 Meteorite Impactites in London: Irongate House, Houndsditch EC3 Ruth Siddall Irongate House (below) was designed by architects Fitzroy, Robinson & Partners and completed in 1978. It is a building that is quite easy to ignore. Situated at the Aldgate end of Houndsditch in the City of London, this is a now rather dated, 1970s office block surrounded, and arguably encroached upon by the sparkling glass slabs and cylinders of new modern blocks nicknamed the ‘Gherkin’ and the ‘Cheesegrater’. Walking past, at pavement level, it could indeed be dismissed as the entrance to an underground car park. But look up! Irongate House is a geological gem with a unique and spectacular decorative stone used for cladding the façade. Eric Robinson corresponded with the architects during the building of Irongate House, whilst he was compiling his urban geological walk from the Royal Exchange to Aldgate (Robinson, 1982) and the second volume of the London: Illustrated Geological Walks (Robinson, 1985). Eric discovered that Fitzroy, Robinson & Partners’ stone contractors had chosen a most exotic, unusual and unexpected rock, newly available on the market. This is an orthogneiss from South Africa called the Parys Gneiss. What makes this rock more interesting is that the town of Parys, where the quarries are located, is positioned close to the centre of a major meteorite impact crater, the Vredefort Dome, and the effects of this event, melts associated with the impact called pseudotachylites, cross-cut the gneiss and can be observed here in the City of London. Both to mine and Eric’s knowledge, Parys Gneiss is used here uniquely in the UK, and as such it also made it into Ashurst & Dimes (1998)’s review of building stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Fracturing and Impact Residue Emplacement: Can Modelling Help to Predict Their Location in Major Craters?
    Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters? Item Type Proceedings; text Authors Kearsley, A.; Graham, G.; McDonnell, T.; Bland, P.; Hough, R.; Helps, P. Citation Kearsley, A., Graham, G., McDonnell, T., Bland, P., Hough, R., & Helps, P. (2004). Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters?. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 39(2), 247-265. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00339.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 23/09/2021 21:19:20 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/655802 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 2, 247–265 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters? Anton KEARSLEY,1* Giles GRAHAM,2 Tony McDONNELL,3 Phil BLAND,4 Rob HOUGH,5 and Paul HELPS6 1Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 2Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, USA 3Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK 4Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK 5Museum of Western Australia, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia 6School of Earth Sciences and Geography, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, KT1 2EE, UK *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 30 June 2003; revision accepted 15 December 2003) Abstract–Understanding the nature and composition of larger extraterrestrial bodies that may collide with the Earth is important.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Analysis of the Collar of the Vredefort Dome, South Africa— Significance for Impact-Related Deformation and Central Uplift Formation
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 40, Nr 9/10, 1537–1554 (2005) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Structural analysis of the collar of the Vredefort Dome, South Africa— Significance for impact-related deformation and central uplift formation Frank WIELAND, Roger L. GIBSON*, and Wolf Uwe REIMOLD Impact Cratering Research Group, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, P.O. Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 25 October 2004; revision accepted 13 July 2005) Abstract–Landsat TM, aerial photograph image analysis, and field mapping of Witwatersrand supergroup meta-sedimentary strata in the collar of the Vredefort Dome reveals a highly heterogeneous internal structure involving folds, faults, fractures, and melt breccias that are interpreted as the product of shock deformation and central uplift formation during the 2.02 Ga Vredefort impact event. Broadly radially oriented symmetric and asymmetric folds with wavelengths ranging from tens of meters to kilometers and conjugate radial to oblique faults with strike-slip displacements of, typically, tens to hundreds of meters accommodated tangential shortening of the collar of the dome that decreased from ∼17% at a radius from the dome center of 21 km to <5% at a radius of 29 km. Ubiquitous shear fractures containing pseudotachylitic breccia, particularly in the metapelitic units, display local slip senses consistent with either tangential shortening or tangential extension; however, it is uncertain whether they formed at the same time as the larger faults or earlier, during the shock pulse. In addition to shatter cones, quartzite units show two fracture types—a cm- spaced rhomboidal to orthogonal type that may be the product of shock-induced deformation and later joints accomplishing tangential and radial extension.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeontological Heritage of the Free State
    SAHRA PALAEOTECHNICAL REPORT PALAEONTOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF THE FREE STATE Brandwag Rock Golden Gate Highlands National Park. Photograpgh: Gideon Groenewald Dr Gideon Groenewald Cell: (082) 339-9202 David Groenewald Cell: (083) 469-4696 Logistical Support: Sue Groenewald Cell: (082) 339 9202 PO Box 360, Clarens, 9707 ([email protected]) (Copyright: March 2014) GENERAL INTRODUCTION The core purpose of this SAHRA palaeotechnical report (PTR) is to briefly but comprehensively document the palaeontological heritage resources in South Africa in an accessible and useful format. Following the request by SAHRA, the report is presented in the form of two sections. The first section outlines the general geological history of South Africa and the second section provides a more detailed, geological history of the Free State, Gauteng, North West, Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces with specific reference to the palaeontological sensitivity of geological formations and their importance to the development of life through 3600 million years of time in Earth history. The first section summarises the geological history of South Africa and gives a very brief description of the six major events that shaped the Earth over time. The known and predicted fossil heritage within all the major fossiliferous stratigraphic units (formations, groups etc) that crop out in South Africa are presented on a map that relates directly to the composite geological map of South Africa where mapping was done on a 1:250 000 scale. The palaeontological sensitivity of geological units was allocated sensitivity ratings on a five point scale: very high sensitivity, high sensitivity, moderate sensitivity, low sensitivity and very low sensitivity (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81928-2 - Perilous Planet Earth: Catastrophes and Catastrophism Through the Ages Trevor Palmer Index More information Index Abbas, Asfar and Samar, 206 Alvarez, Walter, 214–18, 222, 223, 226, 234, 235, Abu Ruwash (Egypt), 325, 326 237, 238, 242, 250, 272, 278, 280, 282, 283, acid rain, 204, 222, 232, 233, 239, 336, 342, 365 350 American Association for the Advancement of acquired characteristics, inheritance of, 29, 33, 61, Science, 124 80, 86–8, 91, 93, 167, 173. American Museum of Natural History, 107, 138, Acraman impact structure (Australia), 257 151, 164, 300 actualism, principle of, 19, 46, 77 amino acids, 92, 235 adaptive evolution, 88–91, 97, 102, 147, 148, 151, ammonites, 215, 229, 265, 269 155–7, 169, 178, 181 ammonoids, 133, 265, 269 adaptive mutations, 175 Amor asteroids, 192 Afar region (Ethiopia), hominid fossils from, 108, 1999 AN10 (asteroid), 200 161, 162, 289 Ancient Mysteries (James and Thorpe), 319, 320, Africa–Eurasia collision, 26, 287, 302 347, 348 Agassiz, Louis, 41, 49, 53, 54, 59, 72 Anders, Mark, 233 Ager, Derek, 30 Anderson, David, 352 age of the Earth, 5, 6, 14, 18, 19, 33, 34, 82, 83, Andromedid meteors, 57 172, 173 Angkor complex (Cambodia), 328, 329 Ahrens, Thomas, 208 Annals of Fulda, 353–8 Akkad civilisation, 340 Annals of St. Bertin, 353–6 Akrotiri (Santorini), 131, 132, 335 Annals of Xanten, 353–7 Al’Amarah Crater (Iraq), 348 anoxia, 256, 257, 259–64, 267, 268, 284–6, 315, Alamo Crater (Nevada), 261 366 Alaska earthquake, 211 Antarctica–Australia separation, 269,
    [Show full text]
  • Pnads295.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Honourable Premier of the Free State 3 Provincial Map, Free State 4 How to use the HIV-911 directory 6 SEARCH BY DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY DC20 Fezile Dabi 9 DC18 Lejweleputswa 15 DC17 Motheo 21 DC19 Thabo Mofutsanyane 31 DC16 Xhariep 39 Acknowledgements 43 Order form 44 Organisational Update Form - Update your organisational details 45 “This directory of HIV-related services in Free State is partially made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the President’s Emergency Plan.The contents are the responsibility of the Centre for HIV/AIDS Networking (through a Sub-Agreement with Foundation for Professional Development) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government” 1 HOW TO USE THE HIV-911 DIRECTORY WHO IS THE DIRECTORY FOR? This directory is for anyone who is seeking information on where to locate HIV/AIDS services and support in Free State. WHAT INFORMATION DOES THE DIRECTORY CONTAIN? Within the directory you will find information on organisations that provide HIV/AIDS-related services and support in each municipality within Free State. We have provided full contact details, an organisational overview and a listing of services for each organisation. Details on a range of HIV-related services are provided, from government clinics that dispense anti-retro- viral drugs (ARVs) and provide Voluntary Counselling and Testing (VCT), to faith-based and non-governmental interventions and Community Home-based Care and food parcel support programmes. HOW DO I USE THE DIRECTORY? There are close to 200 organisations working in HIV/AIDS in Free State.
    [Show full text]
  • 02 Context Analysis
    02 CONTEXT ANALYSIS The purpose of the Context Analysis is to pro- vide a general understanding of the greater context within which the design intervention is proposed. The background, climatic conditions, signifi- cance, vegetation and historical context is discussed to enable a greater insight and com- prehension pertaining to the various design decisions that were taken. Background 2.1 Background 220 000 years ago a blazing meteorite crashed into the of a large meteorite approximately 220 000 years ago earth’s crust. The collision resulted in an impact crater [Reimold et al, 1999:1]. with a diameter of 1,13km and a depth of 200m. This crater is currently known as the Tswaing Crater, previ- It is one of the best preserved impact craters in the ously famous as the Pretoria Saltpan or Zoutpan crater world and the only crater that is accessible by foot [Reimold et al, 1999:1]. right down to its centre. It is the fourth meteorite cra- ter museum in the world, and the only one in Africa The site has strong associations with storytelling and [others being the Meteor Crater in the United States, mythological beliefs sparked by the significant magical Ries Crater in Germany, and some exhibits in the town realm presented by this unique and nearly perfectly of Rochechouart in France] [Reimold et al, 1999:2]. circular structure. Some storytellers profess that a gi- ant snake lives just below the gloomy waters of the Memorandums of Understanding have been conclud- crater lake and that this creature trains sangomas [tra- ed between the NFI [National Flagship Institute] and ditional healers and prophets] in their skills [Reimold the City of Tshwane, and the NFI and GDACE [Gauteng et al, 1999:1].
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Cratering – Fundamental Process in Geoscience and Planetary Science
    Impact cratering – fundamental process in geoscience and planetary science JKPati1 and WUReimold2 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Nehru Science Centre, University of Allahabad, Allahabad 211 002, India. e-mail: [email protected] 2Museum f. Natural History (Mineralogy), Humboldt-University in Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany. e-mail: [email protected] Impact cratering is a geological process characterized by ultra-fast strain rates, which generates extreme shock pressure and shock temperature conditions on and just below planetary surfaces. Despite initial skepticism, this catastrophic process has now been widely accepted by geoscientists with respect to its importance in terrestrial – indeed, in planetary – evolution. About 170 impact structures have been discovered on Earth so far, and some more structures are considered to be of possible impact origin. One major extinction event, at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, has been firmly linked with catastrophic impact, but whether other important extinction events in Earth history, including the so-called “Mother of All Mass Extinctions” at the Permian–Triassic boundary, were triggered by huge impact catastrophes is still hotly debated and a subject of ongoing research. There is a beneficial side to impact events as well, as some impact structures worldwide have been shown to contain significant (in some cases, world class) ore deposits, including the gold– uranium province of the Witwatersrand basin in South Africa, the enormous Ni and PGE deposits of the Sudbury structure in Canada, as well as important hydrocarbon resources, especially in North America. Impact cratering is not a process of the past, and it is mandatory to improve knowledge of the past-impact record on Earth to better constrain the probability of such events in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam A. Garde and Martin B. Klausen
    The Vredefort pseudotachylytes – a centennial reappraisal of Shand (1916): shaken, not stirred by meteorite impacting Adam A. Garde1 and Martin B. Klausen2 1Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 2Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa 1 2 3 4 Pseudotachylyte, Salvamento quarry, Photograph of outcrop with arrested Shock-induced dendritic fractures, Distribution of pseudotachylyte, Interpretation of further pseudotachylyte Full-blown pseudotachylyte zone, and coauthor Martin B. Klausen pseudotachylyte formation traced from photograph of outcrop traced from photograph of outcrop formation with continued seismic shaking Leeukop quarry (prior to impact-induced seismic shaking) Pseudotachylyte zone (as mapped Background and objectives by Dressler & Reimold 2004) Conclusions – see also Garde & Klausen (2016) ★ Observations and samples, this study R • Major pseudotachylyte zones constitute a spectacular component of the renowned, c. 2.023 Ga Vredefort LLA • Observations in the host rocks are the key to understand the pseudotachylytes. Their development was CO RT impact structure in South Africa, but it has always been difficult to explain how they were formed. EFO initiated by a shock-induced, dendritic fracture system that penetrated the granitic host rocks and ED VR temporarily loosened individual blocks with sizes from centimetres to metres. • In his famous original account of the pseudotachylytes, S. J. Shand (1916) interpreted them as due to ★Salvamento ★ cataclasis and frictional heating. Shand [v] also pointed out two enigmas which have remained unsolved: ★Leeukop Otavi ★ Vaal river island • After the initial fracturing, intense impact-induced seismic shaking of the now loosened blocks destroyed • 1) Shand realised that the volumes of pseudotachylyte he observed at Vredefort greatly exceeded those of Vaal Parys their margins by cataclasis , whereby the blocks gradually became smaller and smaller and more and more other pseudotachylytes located within faults elsewhere on Earth, rounded.
    [Show full text]