Evidence from Lonar Crater, India P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evidence from Lonar Crater, India P JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 110, B12402, doi:10.1029/2005JB003662, 2005 Structural effects of meteorite impact on basalt: Evidence from Lonar crater, India P. Senthil Kumar National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India Received 31 January 2005; revised 17 August 2005; accepted 26 August 2005; published 8 December 2005. [1] Lonar crater is a simple, bowl-shaped, near-circular impact crater in the 65 Myr old Deccan Volcanic Province in India. As Lonar crater is a rare terrestrial crater formed entirely in basalt, it provides an excellent opportunity to study the impact deformation in target basalt, which is common on the surfaces of other terrestrial planets and their satellites. The present study aims at documenting the impact deformational structures in the massive basalt well exposed on the upper crater wall, where the basalt shows upward turning of the flow sequence, resulting in a circular deformation pattern. Three fracture systems (radial, concentric, and conical fractures) are exposed on the inner crater wall. On the fracture planes, plumose structures are common. Uplift and tilting of the basalt sequence and formation of the fractures inside the crater are clearly related to the impact event and are different from the preimpact structures such as cooling-related columnar joints and fractures of possible tectonic origin, which are observed outside the crater. Slumping is common throughout the inner wall, and listric faulting displaces the flows in the northeastern inner wall. The impact structures of Lonar crater are broadly similar to those at other simple terrestrial craters in granites and clastic sedimentary rocks and even small-scale experimental craters formed in gabbro targets. As Lonar crater is similar to the strength-controlled laboratory craters, impact parameters could be modeled for this crater, provided maximum depth of fracture formation would be known. Citation: Kumar, P. S. (2005), Structural effects of meteorite impact on basalt: Evidence from Lonar crater, India, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B12402, doi:10.1029/2005JB003662. 1. Introduction impact cratering is important, as it addresses how the outer layer of Earth has been modified due to impacts, [2] Impact cratering is one of the important geological and also its effect on the physical, chemical and biolog- processes that have modified the surfaces of all planets and ical systems. The hazard of near-Earth asteroid or comet satellites of our Solar System [Melosh, 1989]. The impact impacts on Earth is to be assessed very carefully [e.g., event produces craters of various sizes and shapes; based on Chapman, 2004]. Impact cratering processes are under- geometry, the craters are classified into simple and complex stood by integrating impact geological information, dril- craters. Simple craters are circular, bowl-shaped depressions ling results, geophysical investigations, laboratory with raised rims and quasi-parabolic profiles, whereas experiments and numerical modeling studies. Of these, complex craters exhibit central structural uplifts, rim syn- numerical modeling has been found to be a powerful tool clines and outer concentric zones of normal faulting. An in understanding the various stages of formation of impact-cratering event may be indicated by geomorphology impact craters [e.g., O’Keefe and Ahrens, 1993, 1999; (crater shape) but is recognized on the basis of shock Melosh and Ivanov, 1999; Wu¨nnemann and Ivanov, 2003; metamorphic signatures in the target rocks [e.g., Melosh, Collins et al., 2004]. Collins et al. [2004] modeled the 1989; Koeberl, 1997] and characteristics of the impact melt impact deformation around a 10-km-diameter crater, products [e.g., Dressler and Reimold, 2001] and the ejecta whose target composition was assumed to be granite. deposits [e.g., Melosh, 1989]. They showed that the stresses, strains, and strain rates [3] Earth has witnessed impact events throughout its geo- are all highest near the impact site and decrease with logical history [e.g., Frey, 1980; Glikson, 1993; Montanari et radial distance. However, as pointed out by these authors, al., 1998]. More than 170 impact structures have been it is very important to validate numerical models based recognized so far, and are listed in the ‘‘Earth Impact on the observational evidence, especially using the quan- Database’’ of Planetary and Space Science Centre, University titative analysis of damage and deformation in the target of New Brunswick, Canada (http://www.unb.ca/passc/ surrounding a natural impact crater. Therefore structural ImpactDatabase/essay.html). An understanding of terrestrial geological studies, which include identification of various impact deformational features, their geometries, kinemat- Copyright 2005 by the American Geophysical Union. ics, and quantification of strain, are required for modeling 0148-0227/05/2005JB003662$09.00 the impact cratering processes. B12402 1of10 B12402 KUMAR: IMPACT STRUCTURES IN LONAR CRATER B12402 Figure 1. (a) Geological sketch map of Lonar crater. Boundary of the ejecta is drawn on the basis of the work by Ghosh [2003]. A massive basalt flow is well exposed on the upper crater wall, and the underlying flows are covered by basalt debris, soil, and vegetation. Impact melt fragments and spherules are found in the clayey alteration products of the ejecta materials, and one such occurrence is shown in the map. (b) A sketch map of normal faulting in the northeastern part of the inner wall. [4] Although impact structures have been studied exten- [1980]. Lonar crater is a simple, bowl-shaped crater with sively on Earth [e.g., Ackermann et al., 1975; Grieve and a rim-to-rim diameter of 1.8 km, and a rim-to-floor depth Robertson, 1976; Brandt and Reimold, 1995; Dressler and of 150 m (apparent depth). A continuous blanket of ejecta Sharpton, 1997; Reimold et al., 1998a; Bjørnerud, 1998; extends outward to a distance of 1350 m from the rim crest, Christeson et al., 2001; Lemieux et al., 2003; Sagy et al., and contains basalt fragments of various sizes and shapes, 2004], there is no detailed study available on the structural clays, and glassy impact melt fragments and spherules at a effects of meteorite impact on basalt, forming a simple number of places. The slope of the ejecta blanket is 2°–6° impact crater, like Lonar (Figure 1). As Lonar crater is one away from the crater. Maximum elevation of the crater rim is of the two known rare natural craters formed entirely in 590–600 m above mean sea level, and the elevation of the basalt, the study of its structural geology would throw light central crater floor is 470 m. A shallow alkaline lake on the impact deformation processes that takes place on occupies the crater floor. Drilling carried out in the crater terrestrial planets and their satellites. Therefore, in the floor revealed a 100 m thick lensoidal deposit of crater present study, the structural geology of basalts exposed sediments underlain by intensely fractured basaltic rocks both inside and outside Lonar crater is documented, in [Fredriksson et al., 1973]. The depth of the true crater floor order to resolve the precratering, syncratering, and post- may be >400 m below the rim crest, as calculated from the cratering structures. drilling results. Basalt breccia recovered in the drill cores shows evidence for postimpact hydrothermal alteration [e.g., Hagerty and Newsom, 2003]. 2. Geology [6] Five individual flows of massive, vesicular and [5] Lonar crater was formed in Deccan basalts (Figure 1), amygdaloidal basalts are exposed on the inner wall. The at 19°580N, 76°310E, near Lonar village in Buldhana district basalts are quartz-normative tholeiites of high total iron and of Maharashtra State in India. The 65 Myr old Deccan CaO, and lower Al2O3 and MgO, similar to the composi- basalts overlie the Precambrian rock formations and tions of basaltic Martian meteorites [Hagerty and Newsom, Paleozoic-Mesozoic sedimentary rocks of the southern 2003]. Although Lonar crater was initially thought to be Indian Shield. The regional geology of the Deccan basalts volcanic in origin, La Fond and Dietz [1964] demonstrated has been reviewed by Subbarao [1999], and the geological its impact origin based on geomorphology and documenting setting of Lonar crater was discussed by Fudali et al. shock effects [see also Nayak, 1972; Fredriksson et al., 2of10 B12402 KUMAR: IMPACT STRUCTURES IN LONAR CRATER B12402 dip steeply and have multiple orientations, resulting in circular pole density contours (Figure 2b). The deeply altered underlying flows are rich in laterites and clays, in which columnar joints are absent. [8] Massive basalt without columnar joints is also present but is comparatively rarer. It shows fractures, which are related to tectonic deformation (Figures 2e, 2f, and 2g). Most of them are subvertical and are oriented in NW-SE to NNW-SSE directions, and a few other fractures strike in NE-SW direction. Some fractures occur as conjugate pairs. Although the exact origin of these fractures is unknown as of now, they are broadly similar to the major fracture systems found in other parts of the Deccan Volcanic Province [e.g., Widdowson and Mitchell, 1999]. [9] Thickness and nature of the basaltic sequence in Lonar is unknown. Drilling studies at the 1993 Latur earthquake site, which is located 150 km south of Lonar, suggested that the thickness of the basalt sequence is 350 m, and is underlain by Archaean granites and gneisses [Gupta et al., 1999], which are the common rock types in the southern Indian Shield. In Lonar, the Figure 2. Preimpact structures observed in massive basalt basalt sequence may be thicker, as several studies have outside of Lonar crater. (a) Equal-area plots of poles to the indicated a northward increase of its thickness [e.g., orientation of columnar joints. (b) Pole density contours of Mitchell and Widdowson, 1991]. More geophysical inves- columnar joint orientations, (c) Length-weighted rose tigations and drilling studies are required at Lonar and in diagram for columnar joint orientations.
Recommended publications
  • A Study of the Brushy Creek Feature, Saint Helena Parish, Louisiana Andrew Schedl
    Open-File Series No. 18-01 Fall 2018 A Study of the Brushy Creek Feature, Saint Helena Parish, Louisiana Andrew Schedl Abstract This study was unable to determine the origin of the Brushy Creek feature. New¯ thin sections were made and new and old thin sections were examined using the opti- cal and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Powdered samples from the center of Brushy Creek were examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD). In sample 16SHPA, a half dozen new grains with probable planar deformation features (PDF) were found with orientations of {1012} and {1011}. Preliminary SEM studies of zircons showed no evidence for PDFs or reidite. Only one grain from the center of Brushy Creek structure showed possible rectangular fracture. XRD analysis found no evidence for high-pressure forms of quartz, coesite and stishovite. Suggestions for further study are included. Introduction North-south oriented ridges and ravines dominate the landscape in this part of Louisiana. The Brushy Creek is a “noticeable circular hole” in the ridge/ravine topography (Heinrich, 2003). The feature is about 2 kilometers in diameter and has a relief of 15 meters and Brushy Creek breeches the southeast rim of this feature. Exposed in the rim is the poorly lithified and highly fractured Pliocene Citronelle Formation. Near the Brushy Creek feature, the Citronelle formation consists of cross-bedded, massive, poorly sorted fine to coarse sand 9-12 meters thick underlain by 6 meters of laminated clay and silt. The Kentwood Brick and Tile Company has drilled the center of the feature and have found that the laminated clay and silt is absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Cratering
    6 Impact cratering The dominant surface features of the Moon are approximately circular depressions, which may be designated by the general term craters … Solution of the origin of the lunar craters is fundamental to the unravel- ing of the history of the Moon and may shed much light on the history of the terrestrial planets as well. E. M. Shoemaker (1962) Impact craters are the dominant landform on the surface of the Moon, Mercury, and many satellites of the giant planets in the outer Solar System. The southern hemisphere of Mars is heavily affected by impact cratering. From a planetary perspective, the rarity or absence of impact craters on a planet’s surface is the exceptional state, one that needs further explanation, such as on the Earth, Io, or Europa. The process of impact cratering has touched every aspect of planetary evolution, from planetary accretion out of dust or planetesimals, to the course of biological evolution. The importance of impact cratering has been recognized only recently. E. M. Shoemaker (1928–1997), a geologist, was one of the irst to recognize the importance of this process and a major contributor to its elucidation. A few older geologists still resist the notion that important changes in the Earth’s structure and history are the consequences of extraterres- trial impact events. The decades of lunar and planetary exploration since 1970 have, how- ever, brought a new perspective into view, one in which it is clear that high-velocity impacts have, at one time or another, affected nearly every atom that is part of our planetary system.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Fluvial Reworking of Impact Ejecta—A Case Study from the Ries Crater, Southern Germany
    Multiple fluvial reworking of impact ejecta--A case study from the Ries crater, southern Germany Item Type Article; text Authors Buchner, E.; Schmieder, M. Citation Buchner, E., & Schmieder, M. (2009). Multiple fluvial reworking of impact ejecta—A case study from the Ries crater, southern Germany. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 44(7), 1051-1060. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.tb00787.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 06/10/2021 20:56:07 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/656594 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 44, Nr 7, 1051–1060 (2009) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Multiple fluvial reworking of impact ejecta—A case study from the Ries crater, southern Germany Elmar BUCHNER* and Martin SCHMIEDER Institut für Planetologie, Universität Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 21 July 2008; revision accepted 12 May 2009) Abstract–Impact ejecta eroded and transported by gravity flows, tsunamis, or glaciers have been reported from a number of impact structures on Earth. Impact ejecta reworked by fluvial processes, however, are sparsely mentioned in the literature. This suggests that shocked mineral grains and impact glasses are unstable when eroded and transported in a fluvial system. As a case study, we here present a report of impact ejecta affected by multiple fluvial reworking including rounded quartz grains with planar deformation features and diaplectic quartz and feldspar glass in pebbles of fluvial sandstones from the “Monheimer Höhensande” ~10 km east of the Ries crater in southern Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Fracturing and Impact Residue Emplacement: Can Modelling Help to Predict Their Location in Major Craters?
    Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters? Item Type Proceedings; text Authors Kearsley, A.; Graham, G.; McDonnell, T.; Bland, P.; Hough, R.; Helps, P. Citation Kearsley, A., Graham, G., McDonnell, T., Bland, P., Hough, R., & Helps, P. (2004). Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters?. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 39(2), 247-265. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00339.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 23/09/2021 21:19:20 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/655802 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 2, 247–265 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters? Anton KEARSLEY,1* Giles GRAHAM,2 Tony McDONNELL,3 Phil BLAND,4 Rob HOUGH,5 and Paul HELPS6 1Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 2Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, USA 3Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK 4Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK 5Museum of Western Australia, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia 6School of Earth Sciences and Geography, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, KT1 2EE, UK *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 30 June 2003; revision accepted 15 December 2003) Abstract–Understanding the nature and composition of larger extraterrestrial bodies that may collide with the Earth is important.
    [Show full text]
  • Ages of Large Lunar Impact Craters and Implications for Bombardment During the Moon’S Middle Age ⇑ Michelle R
    Icarus 225 (2013) 325–341 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Ages of large lunar impact craters and implications for bombardment during the Moon’s middle age ⇑ Michelle R. Kirchoff , Clark R. Chapman, Simone Marchi, Kristen M. Curtis, Brian Enke, William F. Bottke Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut Street, Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, United States article info abstract Article history: Standard lunar chronologies, based on combining lunar sample radiometric ages with impact crater den- Received 20 October 2012 sities of inferred associated units, have lately been questioned about the robustness of their interpreta- Revised 28 February 2013 tions of the temporal dependance of the lunar impact flux. In particular, there has been increasing focus Accepted 10 March 2013 on the ‘‘middle age’’ of lunar bombardment, from the end of the Late Heavy Bombardment (3.8 Ga) until Available online 1 April 2013 comparatively recent times (1 Ga). To gain a better understanding of impact flux in this time period, we determined and analyzed the cratering ages of selected terrains on the Moon. We required distinct ter- Keywords: rains with random locations and areas large enough to achieve good statistics for the small, superposed Moon, Surface crater size–frequency distributions to be compiled. Therefore, we selected 40 lunar craters with diameter Cratering Impact processes 90 km and determined the model ages of their floors by measuring the density of superposed craters using the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Wide Angle Camera mosaic. Absolute model ages were computed using the Model Production Function of Marchi et al.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19700032528 2020-03-23T18:39:47+00:00Z General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) X-640-10-365 PREPRINT NASA TM X16 PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY OF THE AOUELLOUL CRATER GLASS JOHN A. O'KEEFE r- oCr j OCTOBER 1970 GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT, MARYLAND A • N (ACCESSION NUM ER (T U) o^c O TM ( G (C DE) C (NASA CR OR TMX OR ADNUMBER) (CATEGORY) PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY OF THE AOUELLOUL CRATER GLASS John A. O'Keefe Laboratory for Space Physics Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland z s - a ^.l i' ABSTRACT Aouelloul crater glass is studied from the point of view of the hypothesis that it is formed by impact on the local (Zli) sandstone. It is noted that the chemical analyses of the two materials do not agree in a satisfactory way even if the most significant discrepancies, namely those in Fe and H 2O are overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subsurface Structure of Oblique Impact Craters
    The subsurface structure of oblique impact craters Dissertation vorgelegt von Dipl.-Geol. Michael H. Poelchau vom Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) Berlin, 2010 The subsurface structure of oblique impact craters Dissertation vorgelegt von Dipl.-Geol. Michael H. Poelchau vom Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) Berlin, 2010 Gutachter: 1. PD Dr. Thomas Kenkmann 2. Prof. Wolf-Uwe Reimold Tag der Disputation: 23.02.2010 Statement regarding the contributions of the author and others to this thesis This thesis is comprised of three published, peer-reviewed articles and one submitted manuscript, which each form separate chapters within this thesis. The chapters “Introduction” and “General Conclusions” were written especially for this thesis. The PhD candidate is the first author of two of these articles, and the second author of the third article. The PhD candidate is also the first author of a manuscript currently submitted to Earth and Planetary Science Letters. Therefore, these four chapters have their own introduction, methodology, discussion, conclusions and references. The articles and manuscripts used in this thesis are the following: Poelchau, M. H., and T. Kenkmann, 2008. Asymmetric signatures in simple craters as an indicator for an oblique impact direction, Meteoritcal and Planetary Science, 43, 2059-2072. Poelchau M. H., Kenkmann T. and Kring D. A., 2009. Rim uplift and crater shape in Meteor Crater: the effects of target heterogeneities and trajectory obliquity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, E01006, doi:10.1029/2008JE003235. Kenkmann, T.
    [Show full text]
  • N92-10772 GLACIAL and MARINE CHRONOLOGY of MARS; Robert G
    N92-10772 GLACIAL AND MARINE CHRONOLOGY OF MARS; Robert G. Strom, Jeffrey S. Kargel, Natasha Johnson, and Christine Knight; Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721 A hydrological model involving episodic oceans and ice sheets on Mars has been presented by r_^l ...... ! /1 "_ ¢'N_ Ale *1_ m-i;n .nralrt,_int_e ¢.r_nr,_r_ine¢ thle mc'u_l ic th_ _tor_ _nd enrrwl_tinn nf thw_,_ DC_l_.Vdt, GI t_;. _LI*X_]* %.Jtt_w t,J& UtV *&t_tt W**vva_**mv_ vv*a_w****m*_ _t_ *t*_w ....... O ..................... events. Even more uncertain are their absolute ages. However, based on stratigraphic and cratering evidence, the most recent occurrence of these events was relatively late in Martian history. The cratering record on Mars can be divided into three general periods: 1) the period of late heavy bombardment, 2) a transition period at the end of late heavy bombardment, and 3) the post heavy bombardment era (3). The crater size/frequency distribution represented by the period of late heavy bombardment is characterized by a complex curve with a differential -2 slope (cumulative -1) at diameters less than about 50 km diameter, while the post heavy bombardment size distribution has a differential -3 slope (cumulative -2) over the same diameter range (Fig. 1). On the Martian time-stratigraphic scale, the period of late heavy bombardment occurred during Noachian and Early Hesperian time and came to an end during the Middle Hesperian. The post heavy bombardment era began in Late Hesperian time and extends through the Amazonian Epoch to the present day (3).
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) X-640-10-365 PREPRINT NASA TM X16 PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY OF THE AOUELLOUL CRATER GLASS JOHN A. O'KEEFE r- oCr j OCTOBER 1970 GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT, MARYLAND A • N (ACCESSION NUM ER (T U) o^c O TM ( G (C DE) C (NASA CR OR TMX OR ADNUMBER) (CATEGORY) PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY OF THE AOUELLOUL CRATER GLASS John A. O'Keefe Laboratory for Space Physics Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland z s - a ^.l i' ABSTRACT Aouelloul crater glass is studied from the point of view of the hypothesis that it is formed by impact on the local (Zli) sandstone. It is noted that the chemical analyses of the two materials do not agree in a satisfactory way even if the most significant discrepancies, namely those in Fe and H 2O are overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentary Record of Impact Events in Spain
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 356 2002 Sedimentary record of impact events in Spain Enrique Dı´az-Martı´nez* Enrique Sanz-Rubio Jesu´s Martı´nez-Frı´as Centro de Astrobiologı´a Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas—Instituto Nacional de Te´cnica Aeroespacial, Carretera, Torrejo´n-Ajalvir kilo´metro 4, 28850 Torrejo´n de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain ABSTRACT A review of the evidence of meteorite-impact events in the sedimentary record of Spain reveals that the only proven impact-related bed is the clay layer at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary (at Zumaya and Sopelana in the Bay of Biscay region, and at Caravaca, Agost, and Alamedilla in the Betic Cordilleras). Other deposits previously proposed as impact related can now be rejected, or are dubious and still debated. These include the Pelarda Formation, alleged to represent proximal ejecta from the Azuara structure; the Paleocene-Eocene boundary near Zumaya (western Pyrenees) and Alamedilla (Betic Cordillera); and the Arroyofrı´o Oolite Bed, which has been alleged as distal ejecta of an unknown Callovian-Oxfordian impact event. The scarcity of evidence for meteorite-impact events in the sedimentary record is possibly due to a lack of detailed studies. We propose several sedimentary units that could potentially be related to impact events, and where future research should focus. INTRODUCTION DISTAL RECORD OF IMPACT EVENTS The sedimentary record of Spain presents evidence for at The evidence from sedimentary units to be considered as least one impact event, as well as a number of units of potential distal impact ejecta may consist of geochemical anomalies of impact clastic origin (some of which are currently under inves- elements and isotopes (e.g., Ir, 187Os/188Os), the presence of tigation).
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-81928-2 - Perilous Planet Earth: Catastrophes and Catastrophism Through the Ages Trevor Palmer Index More information Index Abbas, Asfar and Samar, 206 Alvarez, Walter, 214–18, 222, 223, 226, 234, 235, Abu Ruwash (Egypt), 325, 326 237, 238, 242, 250, 272, 278, 280, 282, 283, acid rain, 204, 222, 232, 233, 239, 336, 342, 365 350 American Association for the Advancement of acquired characteristics, inheritance of, 29, 33, 61, Science, 124 80, 86–8, 91, 93, 167, 173. American Museum of Natural History, 107, 138, Acraman impact structure (Australia), 257 151, 164, 300 actualism, principle of, 19, 46, 77 amino acids, 92, 235 adaptive evolution, 88–91, 97, 102, 147, 148, 151, ammonites, 215, 229, 265, 269 155–7, 169, 178, 181 ammonoids, 133, 265, 269 adaptive mutations, 175 Amor asteroids, 192 Afar region (Ethiopia), hominid fossils from, 108, 1999 AN10 (asteroid), 200 161, 162, 289 Ancient Mysteries (James and Thorpe), 319, 320, Africa–Eurasia collision, 26, 287, 302 347, 348 Agassiz, Louis, 41, 49, 53, 54, 59, 72 Anders, Mark, 233 Ager, Derek, 30 Anderson, David, 352 age of the Earth, 5, 6, 14, 18, 19, 33, 34, 82, 83, Andromedid meteors, 57 172, 173 Angkor complex (Cambodia), 328, 329 Ahrens, Thomas, 208 Annals of Fulda, 353–8 Akkad civilisation, 340 Annals of St. Bertin, 353–6 Akrotiri (Santorini), 131, 132, 335 Annals of Xanten, 353–7 Al’Amarah Crater (Iraq), 348 anoxia, 256, 257, 259–64, 267, 268, 284–6, 315, Alamo Crater (Nevada), 261 366 Alaska earthquake, 211 Antarctica–Australia separation, 269,
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorite Impacts, Earth, and the Solar System
    Traces of Catastrophe A Handbook of Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Structures Bevan M. French Research Collaborator Department of Mineral Sciences, MRC-119 Smithsonian Institution Washington DC 20560 LPI Contribution No. 954 i Copyright © 1998 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any portion thereof requires the written permission of the Insti- tute as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. Figures 3.1, 3.2, and 3.5 used by permission of the publisher, Oxford University Press, Inc. Figures 3.13, 4.16, 4.28, 4.32, and 4.33 used by permission of the publisher, Springer-Verlag. Figure 4.25 used by permission of the publisher, Yale University. Figure 5.1 used by permission of the publisher, Geological Society of America. See individual captions for reference citations. This volume may be cited as French B. M. (1998) Traces of Catastrophe:A Handbook of Shock-Metamorphic Effects in Terrestrial Meteorite Impact Structures. LPI Contribution No. 954, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 120 pp. This volume is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113, USA Phone:281-486-2172 Fax:281-486-2186 E-mail:[email protected] Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling. Cover Art.“One Minute After the End of the Cretaceous.” This artist’s view shows the ancestral Gulf of Mexico near the present Yucatán peninsula as it was 65 m.y.
    [Show full text]