Restriction Enzymes and the Boon to Modern Molecular Biology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Restriction Enzymes and the Boon to Modern Molecular Biology PNAS CLASSIC PAPER Danna and Nathans: Restriction enzymes and the boon to modern molecular biology n 1971, a paper published in PNAS proteins and viral RNA. Although he time,’’ said Danna, currently an associ- (1) helped jump-start the era of never obtained a Ph.D., the work gave ate professor at the University of Colo- modern molecular biology and bio- him confidence and experience with bio- rado (Boulder). ‘‘You would try hard to technology, eventually giving rise to chemistry, leading to a faculty position solve a problem and then go to him if Imany of the genetic advances that seem so in the microbiology department at The you needed help.’’ commonplace today. The article, written Johns Hopkins University School of by Academy member Daniel Nathans and Medicine (Baltimore) in 1962. In A Clear Vision his then graduate student, Kathleen Nathans’ own words, he became ‘‘a one- Smith and his postdoctoral student Kelly Danna, exposed the marvelous utility of man ‘Division of Genetics’ ’’ (3), which made rapid progress with their indepen- restriction enzymes. In the accompanying gradually morphed into a sizable group, dent study of the Hemophilus influenzae Perspective highlighting this classic work including graduate student Kathleen restriction enzyme, concluding in 1970 of scientific literature, Rich Roberts pro- Danna, fellow professor Hamilton O. that the enzyme cleaved DNA only at vides a historical account of the scientific Smith, and Smith’s postdoctoral student sites with a specific arrangement of base discoveries leading up to the PNAS paper Thomas Kelly. This combination of tal- pairs. However, after publishing their and the unparalleled scientific advances ents would prove highly fruitful in the findings (4), the scientists abandoned made after its publication. years to come, as Roberts asserts in his the subject of restriction enzymes and Perspective. went on to other research. Leaving Medicine for Research ‘‘I did my nice piece of biochemistry and, for some reason, I wasn’t interested The road to the discovery of restriction A Colossal Understatement in the actual application of the enzyme,’’ enzymes began in 1945, when Nathans After some departmental shuffling, said Smith, an Academy member and cur- enrolled in an undergraduate chemistry Nathans was asked to teach medical stu- rently the scientific director at the Insti- program at the University of Delaware dents about animal viruses. The topic tute for Biological Energy Alternatives (Newark). Lingering in Wilmington, DE, intrigued him, so he switched tracks in (Rockville, MD). ‘‘I just more or less pub- the same town where he was born and his research to study a relatively simple lished my work and put it on the shelf.’’ raised, Nathans initially lived at home tumor virus, simian virus 40 (SV40). To However, Nathans and Danna contin- and commuted to class by hitchhiking. learn how to grow and handle SV40, ued work on the enzyme, with a differ- He was the last of eight children born to Nathans went on sabbatical to The ent spin than that of Smith and Kelly. Russian Jewish immigrant parents, who Weizmann Institute of Science in Reho- ‘‘If you look back on it, it seems like encouraged his natural interest in sci- vot, Israel, in 1969. Roberts chronicles such a simple notion. But the fact is, I ence. Nathans claimed that his father the developments that Smith made dur- think Dan saw the utility of this much saw him as ‘‘the last chance to have a ing Nathan’s absence, noting that Smith more clearly than even those of us who doctor in the family’’ (2). corresponded with Nathans to keep him were very close to the work,’’ said Kelly, ‘‘Becoming a physician also seemed abreast of the research on endonucleases. an Academy member and currently the more attractive to me than any other al- In what proved to be a colossal under- director of Sloan–Kettering Institute ternative I knew about,’’ Nathans noted statement, Nathans wrote in a personal (New York). ‘‘Clearly, he must have had (3), so he applied to medical school and letter to Smith that the finding ‘‘could a vision at the very beginning of this received a scholarship at Washington be useful for many things.’’ Nathans’ that just the simple idea of being able to University (St. Louis). However, an in- research team would begin a few prelim- separate the fragments of viral DNA tense summer session of research con- inary experiments, he noted in the let- into specific pieces would have enor- vinced Nathans that his future lay in ter, ‘‘if everybody is interested to see if mous applications,’’ said Kelly. research and teaching rather than in it looks promising.’’ medical practice. After he received his Upon his return to Johns Hopkins, A Lasting Legacy medical degree in 1954, an internship at Nathans began studying the effect of Throughout his life, Nathans continued to Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in Smith’s enzyme on SV40. Danna soon play an integral part in molecular biology New York, followed by 2 years as a clini- joined the project, and the work became and genetics research. After an extremely cal associate at the National Institutes of the subject of her dissertation. Nathans fruitful career at Johns Hopkins, spanning Health (Bethesda), confirmed Nathans’ sensed Danna was ready for a change— years as the department chair and includ- desire to focus on research. an earlier dissertation project had ended ing a period as university president as well Much to the surprise and dismay of in chaos, with pulverized rat liver spilled as numerous accolades, Nathans suc- his father, Nathans left medicine and across Danna’s laboratory bench. Al- cumbed to leukemia in 1999. However, as began his basic research career at The though Nathans was a rather serious Roberts outlines in the Perspective, the Rockefeller University (New York) in and formal person compared with oth- legacy of Nathans’ 1971 PNAS paper is 1959. However, tired of sitting through ers in the laboratory, the two worked readily visible in almost all areas of mod- endless lectures, Nathans abandoned his well together. ern biotechnology. Ph.D. program at Rockefeller and ‘‘He was always available, but he Christen Brownlee, started laboratory research on bacterial didn’t breathe down your neck all the Freelance Science Writer 1. Danna, K. & Nathans, D. (1971) Proc. Natl. Acad. 3. Odelberg, W., ed. (1979) Les Prix Nobel. The Sci. USA 68, 2913–2917. Nobel Prizes 1978 (Nobel Foundation, Stock- 2. DiMaio, D. (2001) in Biographical Memoirs, ed. holm). Berry, R. S. (Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC), 4. Kelly, T. J. & Smith, H. O. (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 51, Vol. 79, pp. 262–279. 393–409. © 2005 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0502760102 PNAS ͉ April 26, 2005 ͉ vol. 102 ͉ no. 17 ͉ 5909 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021.
Recommended publications
  • Download Ps Nobel Prizes for Site BEE 11.18.16 Revised 11.30.17.Pdf
    Nobel Laureates at the College of Physicians and Surgeons For years, College of Physicians and Surgeons alumni, faculty, and researchers have led groundbreaking clinical and basic scientific studies that have transformed our understanding of human biology and advanced the practice of medicine. On many occasions, this work has been honored with the Nobel Prize. The scope of research led by P&S Nobel laureates is tremendous. Although most of our prizewinners were honored for work in physiology or medicine, a few also received the prize for chemistry. Their research has fundamentally shaped the course of numerous fields, including cardiology, neuroscience, genetics, pharmaceutical development, and more. Our Nobel laureates include: André Cournand and Dickinson Richards (P&S’23), whose work at P&S on cardiac catheterization—a method of inserting a tiny tube into the heart—provided the basis for open-heart surgery and interventional cardiology Baruch Blumberg (P&S’51), who discovered the hepatitis B virus and helped develop a test and a vaccine for the virus Joshua Lederberg, a Columbia College and P&S graduate student who showed that bacteria can exchange genes when they reproduce, creating a way to model and study genetics in higher organisms Harold Varmus (P&S’66), who demonstrated how genes in normal human and animal cells can mutate to cause cancer, leading to a new generation of research on the genetic origins of cancer Eric Kandel, current University Professor, who showed how memories are stored in nerve cells, greatly enhancing
    [Show full text]
  • February 5, 2010, NIH Record, Vol. LXII, No. 3
    FEBRUARY 5, 2010 The Second Best Thing About Payday VOL. LXII, NO. 3 The Revolution Continues Green Offers Tour of Genomic Landscape, Circa 2010 By Rich McManus ABOVE · NIAID’s Alonda LeCounte sacrificed a kidney to benefit her stepfather. See story here is a good reason that Lipsett on p. 7. TAmphitheater was jammed with at- features tendees as NHGRI began its modestly titled Current Topics in Genome Analysis 1 course—an institute staple since 1995— Green Presents Challenges of Genomic Medicine on Jan. 12. The 11-lecture series that ends Mar. 23 was launched by NHGRI di- 3 rector Dr. Eric Green, who in 90 minutes Greider Explains Science Behind Her Nobel Prize surveyed highlights of what mankind has learned of its genetic heritage start- 5 ing before Mendel (1865) to the present. Harvard’s Frenk Lectures on Global Health A postdoctoral fellow at the outset of the Human Genome Project in 1990, NHGRI director Dr. Eric Green 7 Green offered a robust primer of a field NIAID Employee’s Generosity Offers that literally exploded during the “genomic revolution” of the 1990s. Having a front- Stepfather New Life row seat at what is arguably the most significant scientific endeavor of the past century 12 gives Green both authority and a rich fund of metaphor: the 3 billion base pairs NHGRI Fellow Plays with ‘Rock Stars see genome, page 6 Of Science’ Anything Is Possible Nobelist Nirenberg, MIT’s Herr Works to Discoverer of the Make Physical Genetic Code, departments Disabilities a Thing Mourned Of the Past By Alan Schechter Briefs 2 By Valerie Lambros Milestones 9 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Notes on Scientists Involved in the Asilomar Process M.J
    International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering Case Study Series: Asilomar Conference on Laboratory Precautions Appendix D: Biographical Notes on Scientists involved in the Asilomar Process M.J. Peterson Version 1, June 2010 Edward A. Adelberg (1920-2009). PhD Yale 1949. Chair of Yale Department of Microbiology 1961-64 and 1970-72; a founding member of Yale Department of Genetics. Deputy Provost for the Biomedical Sciences, 1983-91. Specialist in plasmid biochemistry of E. coli. Ephraim Anderson (1911-2006). M.D., Durham University. Served in the Royal Army Medical Corps during World War II where he developed interests in Epidemiology. Researcher in Enteric Laboratory of the British Public Health Laboratory Service 1947, Deputy Director 1952, Director 1954-1978. Came to public notice for tracing sources of typhoid outbreaks in Zermatt (1963) and Aberdeen (1964). Built on earlier work by Japanese researchers to demonstrate the plasmid-based pathways by which bacteria could spread antibiotic resistance to others and became the world’s leading expert on antibiotic resistance. Also prominent in efforts to limit use of antibiotics in raising animals. Fellow of the Royal Society 1968; Companion of the Order of the British Empire 1976. Eric Ashby, Baron Ashby (1904-1992). Lecturer in Botany, Imperial College London 1931-35; Reader in Botany Bristol University 1935-37; Professor of Botany University of Sydney 1938-1946; Chair of Botany, University of Manchester 1947-50. Turned to administration as President and Vice-Chancellor of Queen's University, Belfast 1950-59; Master of Clare College in Cambridge University 1959-67 and Vice-Chancellor of Cambridge University 1967-1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Balcomk41251.Pdf (558.9Kb)
    Copyright by Karen Suzanne Balcom 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Karen Suzanne Balcom Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine Committee: E. Glynn Harmon, Supervisor Julie Hallmark Billie Grace Herring James D. Legler Brooke E. Sheldon Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine by Karen Suzanne Balcom, B.A., M.L.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2005 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my first teachers: my father, George Sheldon Balcom, who passed away before this task was begun, and to my mother, Marian Dyer Balcom, who passed away before it was completed. I also dedicate it to my dissertation committee members: Drs. Billie Grace Herring, Brooke Sheldon, Julie Hallmark and to my supervisor, Dr. Glynn Harmon. They were all teachers, mentors, and friends who lifted me up when I was down. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my committee: Julie Hallmark, Billie Grace Herring, Jim Legler, M.D., Brooke E. Sheldon, and Glynn Harmon for their encouragement, patience and support during the nine years that this investigation was a work in progress. I could not have had a better committee. They are my enduring friends and I hope I prove worthy of the faith they have always showed in me. I am grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of Groups Central to the Scientists' Debates About Rdna
    International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering Case Study Series: Asilomar Conference on Laboratory Precautions Appendix C: Members of Groups Central to the Scientists’ Debates about rDNA Research 1973-76 M.J. Peterson Version 1, June 2010 Signers of Singer-Söll Letter 1973 Maxine Singer Dieter Söll Signers of Berg Letter 1974 Paul Berg David Baltimore Herbert Boyer Stanley Cohen Ronald Davis David S. Hogness Daniel Nathans Richard O. Roblin III James Watson Sherman Weissman Norton D. Zinder Organizing Committee for the Asilomar Conference David Baltimore Paul Berg Sydney Brenner Richard O. Roblin III Maxine Singer This case was created by the International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering (IDEESE) Project at the University of Massachusetts Amherst with support from the National Science Foundation under grant number 0734887. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. More information about the IDEESE and copies of its modules can be found at http://www.umass.edu/sts/ethics. This case should be cited as: M.J. Peterson. 2010. “Asilomar Conference on Laboratory Precautions When Conducting Recombinant DNA Research.” International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering. Available www.umass.edu/sts/ethics. © 2010 IDEESE Project Appendix C Working Groups for the Asilomar Conference Plasmids Richard Novick (Chair) Royston C. Clowes (Institute for Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Dallas) Stanley N. Cohen Roy Curtiss III Stanley Falkow Eukaryotes Donald Brown (Chair) Sydney Brenner Robert H. Burris (Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin) Dana Carroll (Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution, Baltimore) Ronald W.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Nathans 1928–1999
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES DANIEL NATHANS 1928–1999 A Biographical Memoir by DANIEL DIMAIO Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 79 PUBLISHED 2001 BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. Photo by Arthur Kravetz, Baltimore, Maryland DANIEL NATHANS October 30, 1928–November 16, 1999 BY DANIEL DIMAIO ANIEL NATHANS, A SCIENTIST whose pioneering use of D restriction endonucleases revolutionized virology and genetics and whose personal qualities had a profound impact on those who knew him, passed away in November 1999 at the age of 71. He was the University Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, where he served on the faculty for 37 years, and a senior investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute since 1982. Dan is survived by his wife, Joanne; three sons, Eli, Jeremy, and Benjamin; and seven grand- children. Dan was born and raised in Wilmington, Delaware, the youngest of eight children of Russian Jewish immigrants. He attended the University of Delaware, initially living at home and commuting by hitchhiking, and graduated with a degree in chemistry in 1950. He then entered medical school at Washington University in St. Louis, largely because, he claimed, his father saw him “as the last chance to have a doctor in the family.” Dan began medical school with the intention of returning to Wilmington as a general practitioner, but a summer job in a local hospital bored him and made him rethink these plans and return early to St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinical Investigator: Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered-- but Still Beloved
    The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered-- but still beloved. J L Goldstein, M S Brown J Clin Invest. 1997;99(12):2803-2812. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI119470. Editorial Find the latest version: https://jci.me/119470/pdf The Clinical Investigator: Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered—But Still Beloved Editorial Joseph L. Goldstein and Michael S. Brown Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9046 Editor’s note: It is a difficult time for “physician-scien- model is threatened. The threat comes not from the basic side. tists.” The increasing specialization of science on one To the contrary, basic research is flourishing as never before. hand and the financial demands of managed care on the Rather, the threat comes from the failure of the cadre of physi- other are forcing a reconsideration of the role and impor- cian-scientists to grow in proportion to the numbers in basic tance of these individuals. Are they a dying breed? Or research. Indeed, this cadre is shrinking as young physicians are they merely being redefined? In this editorial, Joseph are forced to choose between performing research or practic- Goldstein and Michael Brown of the University of Texas ing medicine, but not both. In this article we highlight both the Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas describe their achievements and challenges faced by the physician-scientist, reading of the plight of the physician-scientist, and offer a and we propose steps that may solve some of the problems. suggestion how this beleaguered species might be saved. We begin with a consideration of Shannon’s multifaceted ca- We plan to continue this discussion in the pages of JCI reer, which exemplifies the highest aspirations of his model.
    [Show full text]
  • Original 1974 Paul Berg Et Al. Call for Caution with Recombinant
    Potential Biohazards of Recombinant DNA Molecules Author(s): Paul Berg, David Baltimore, Herbert W. Boyer, Stanley N. Cohen, Ronald W. Davis, David S. Hogness, Daniel Nathans, Richard Roblin, James D. Watson, Sherman Weissman and Norton D. Zinder Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 185, No. 4148 (Jul. 26, 1974), p. 303 Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1738673 Accessed: 27-08-2015 20:21 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Science. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.163.2.206 on Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:21:36 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LETTERS minimize the spread of such molecules within human and other populations; Potential Biohazards of Sciences give consideration to these and (iii) devising guidelines to be matters. The undersigned members of followed by investigators with Recombinant DNA Molecules working a committee, acting on behalf of and potentially hazardous recombinant with the endorsement of the DNA Recent advances in techniques for Assembly molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • HARRY NOLLER, Ph. D. Harry Noller Was Born in Oakland, California, and Received His Undergraduate Training in Biochemistry at UC, Berkeley
    HARRY NOLLER, Ph. D. Harry Noller was born in Oakland, California, and received his undergraduate training in biochemistry at UC, Berkeley. He did his graduate work on the mechanism of action of serine proteases under Sidney Bernhard in the Institute of Molecular Biology at the University of Oregon, where he received his Ph.D. in Chemistry in 1965. He was an NIH Postdoctoral Fellow at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, where he carried out proteinchemistry in the laboratory of Ieuan Harris in Fred Sanger’s department. In 1966, he joined Alfred Tissières’ laboratory for his second postdoc in the newly formed Dèpartement de Biochimie Genètique in the Institute de Biologie Molèculaire at the University of Geneva, where he began research on ribosomes. In 1968, he joined the faculty of the University of California, Santa Cruz, where he is currently Sinsheimer Professor of Molecular Biology, Professor of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology and Director of the Center for Molecular Biology of RNA. Intending to study the functional roles of the ribosomal proteins by biochemical approaches, experiments in Noller’s lab in the early 1970s pointed unexpectedly to a key functional role for ribosomal RNA. This unanticipated change in direction led to many studies over the following decades directed toward understanding the structure of ribosomal RNA and its functional roles in translation. Among these were the sequencing of the rrnB operon containing the first complete 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA sequences, and, in collaboration with Carl Woese, deducing their secondary structures by comparative sequence analysis. Genetic studies on rRNA in the Noller lab, using vectors based on the rrnB operon, showed that mutations in rRNA could confer severe functional phenotypes such as increased translational error frequencies and defects in tRNA binding.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates in Physiology Or Medicine
    All Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine 1901 Emil A. von Behring Germany ”for his work on serum therapy, especially its application against diphtheria, by which he has opened a new road in the domain of medical science and thereby placed in the hands of the physician a victorious weapon against illness and deaths” 1902 Sir Ronald Ross Great Britain ”for his work on malaria, by which he has shown how it enters the organism and thereby has laid the foundation for successful research on this disease and methods of combating it” 1903 Niels R. Finsen Denmark ”in recognition of his contribution to the treatment of diseases, especially lupus vulgaris, with concentrated light radiation, whereby he has opened a new avenue for medical science” 1904 Ivan P. Pavlov Russia ”in recognition of his work on the physiology of digestion, through which knowledge on vital aspects of the subject has been transformed and enlarged” 1905 Robert Koch Germany ”for his investigations and discoveries in relation to tuberculosis” 1906 Camillo Golgi Italy "in recognition of their work on the structure of the nervous system" Santiago Ramon y Cajal Spain 1907 Charles L. A. Laveran France "in recognition of his work on the role played by protozoa in causing diseases" 1908 Paul Ehrlich Germany "in recognition of their work on immunity" Elie Metchniko France 1909 Emil Theodor Kocher Switzerland "for his work on the physiology, pathology and surgery of the thyroid gland" 1910 Albrecht Kossel Germany "in recognition of the contributions to our knowledge of cell chemistry made through his work on proteins, including the nucleic substances" 1911 Allvar Gullstrand Sweden "for his work on the dioptrics of the eye" 1912 Alexis Carrel France "in recognition of his work on vascular suture and the transplantation of blood vessels and organs" 1913 Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society Vol. 120, Num
    Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society Vol. 120, Num. 1. Año 1976 Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful Knowledge Fred L. Whipple. “Comet Kohoutek in Retrospect” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 120, Num. 1. Año 1976; pagina 1-6 Myron P. Gilmore. “The Berensons and Villa I Tatti” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 120, Num. 1. Año 1976; pagina 7-12 Helen B. Taussig. “The Development of the Blalock-Taussing Operation and Its Results Twenty Years Later” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 120, Num. 1. Año 1976; pagina 13-20 Ward H. Goodenough. “On the Origin of Matrilineal Clans: A “Just So” Story” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 120, Num. 1. Año 1976; pagina 21-36 Leon N. Cooper. “How Possible Becomes Actual in the Quantum Theory” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 120, Num. 1. Año 1976; pagina 37-45 John Owen King. “Labors of the Estranged Personality: Josiah Royce on “The Case of John Bunyan”” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 120, Num. 1. Año 1976; pagina 46-58 Stanley A. Czarnik. “The Theory of the Mesolithic in European Archaeology” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 120, Num. 1. Año 1976; pagina 59-66 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society Vol. 120, Num. 2. Año 1976 Held at Philadelphia for Promoting Useful Knowledge Jonathan E. Rhoads. “New Approaches in the Study of Neoplasia: Preliminary Remarks for the Symposium” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 120, Num. 2. Año 1976; pagina 67-68 Sol Spiegelman. “The Search for Viruses in Human Cancer” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Norton Zinder] Judith N
    Rockefeller University Digital Commons @ RU Rockefeller University Research Profiles Campus Publications Winter 1987 A Fine Playground: [Dr. Norton Zinder] Judith N. Schwartz Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/research_profiles Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Schwartz, Judith N., "A Fine Playground: [Dr. Norton Zinder]" (1987). Rockefeller University Research Profiles. Book 27. http://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/research_profiles/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Campus Publications at Digital Commons @ RU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rockefeller University Research Profiles by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ RU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY "Al! depends on keeping the eye steadily fixed on the facts of nature, and so receiving their images as they are. For God forbid that we should give out a dream ofour own imagination RESEARCH for a pattern ofthe world. " FRANCIS BACON PROFILES WINTER 1987-88 A Fine Playground Bacteriophages - "bacteria eaters" - are tiny viruses that make their living by infecting bacteria. The late Max Delbriick, one of the pioneers of molecular biology, described bacterio­ phage research as "a fine playground for serious children who ask ambitious questions." In 1952 Norton Zinder, a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin, reported in his doctoral dissertation that bac­ teriophages can pick up genes from one bacterium and deposit them in another. Molecular biology was in its infancy. The identification ofDNA as the genetic material had been reported only eight years earlier and was still being debated. Watson and Crick had yet to build a model ofthe double helix structure of DNA.
    [Show full text]