DOCSLIB.ORG

AJP-3, Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AJP-3, Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations NATO STANDARD AJP-3 ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR THE CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS Edition C Version 1 FEBRUARY 2019 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION ALLIED JOINT PUBLICATION Published by the NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) © NATO/OTAN Intentionally blank Intentionally blank AJP-3 Allied Joint Publication-3 Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations Allied Joint Publication-3 (AJP-3), dated February 2019, is promulgated as directed by the Chiefs of Staff Director Concepts and Doctrine Conditions of release This publication is UK Ministry of Defence Crown copyright. Material and information contained in this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system and transmitted for UK Government and MOD use only, except where authority for use by other organisations or individuals has been authorised by a Patent Officer of the Defence Intellectual Property Rights i Edition C Version 1 AJP-3 Intentionally blank Edition C Version 1 ii AJP-3 RECORD OF RESERVATIONS CHAPTER RECORD OF RESERVATION BY NATIONS Note: The reservations listed on this page include only those that were recorded at time of promulgation and may not be complete. Refer to the NATO Standardization Document Database for the complete list of existing reservations. iii Edition C Version 1 AJP-3 Intentionally blank Edition C Version 1 iv AJP-3 RECORD OF SPECIFIC RESERVATIONS [nation] [detail of reservation] Note: The reservations listed on this page include only those that were recorded at time of promulgation and may not be complete. Refer to the NATO Standardization Document Database for the complete list of existing reservations. v Edition C Version 1 AJP-3 Intentionally blank Edition C Version 1 vi AJP-3 SUMMARY OF CHANGES REVISION OF ALLIED JOINT PUBLICATION AJP 3 Edition C, Version 1 • Restructures complete contents to reflect phases of a mission (preparation – execution – termination). • Reduces redundancies and improves continuity between AJP -01 Allied Joint Doctrine, and AJP-5 Allied Joint Doctrine for the Planning of Operations. • Updates NATO Command Structure and NATO Force structure. • Updates fundamentals to reflect latest policy and doctrine. • Updates principles and considerations to reflect latest policy and doctrine and includes Cyber operations and StratCom. • Changes campaign themes and types of conflict to operations themes and types of operations. • Updates Joint Functions to reflect the use of Information as a joint function. • Updates operations management to reflect latest practice and doctrine. • Updates operations assessment to reflect latest practice and doctrine. • Adds section on information management. • Moves and updates annex for joint staff functions. • Adds annex for related capabilities to the joint functions. • Adds annex for battlespace management which establishes cyber as a separate domain. • Adds annex for risk management • Adds annex for lessons learned. • Updates terms and definitions to reflect latest status of NATOTerm and ongoing terminology changes. vii Edition C Version 1 AJP-3 Intentionally blank Edition C Version 1 viii AJP-3 RELATED DOCUMENTS MC 0319/3 NATO Principles and Policies for Logistics MC 133/4 NATO’s Operations Planning MC 0324/3 The NATO Military Command Structure MC 327/2 NATO Military Policy for Non-Article 5 Crisis Response Operations MC 0343/1 NATO Military Assistance to International Disaster Relief Operations MC 362/1 NATO Rules of Engagement MC 376/3 Naval Cooperation and Guidance for Shipping (NCAGS) MC 0400/3 Military Committee Guidance for the Military Implementation of NATO’s Strategic Concept MC 0402/2 NATO Military Policy on Psychological Operations MC 411/2 NATO Military Policy on Civil-Military Cooperation (CIMIC) and Civil-Military Interaction (CMI) MC 422/5 NATO Military Policy for Information Operations MC 0437/2 Special Operations Policy MC 0472/1 Military Committee Concept for Counterterrorism MC 560/2 Policy for Military Engineering MC 586/1 Allied Forces and their Use for Operations MC 0613 Military Committee Concept for the NATO Integrated Air and Missile Defence System MC 0628 NATO Military Policy on Strategic Communications Since Allied Joint Publication-3, Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations is one of the keystone NATO doctrine publications from which level-2 and -3 doctrine is derived, only the capstone and keystone doctrine publications are listed here. References to other doctrine publications are made in the text, where appropriate. AJP-01 Allied Joint Doctrine AJP-2 Allied Joint Doctrine for Intelligence, Counter-Intelligence and Security AJP-4 Allied Joint Doctrine for Logistics AJP-5 Allied Joint Doctrine for the Planning of Operations AJP-6 Allied Joint Doctrine for Communication and Information Systems NATO BI-SC CFAO Conceptual Framework for Alliance Operations, 11 June 2013, as amended on 18 July 2013 ix Edition C Version 1 AJP-3 NATO BI-SC Dir 40-1 Integrating UNSCR 1325 and Gender Perspectives in the NATO Command Structure NATO BI-SC Dir 080-006 Lessons Learned ACO Directive 80-1 Lessons Learned ACO Directive 80-70 Campaign Synchronization and Joint Targeting in NATO ACO Directive 080-104 NATO Force Integration Units dated 09 August 2016 AC35-D1040 REV 6 Supporting Document on Information and Intelligence Sharing with non-NATO Entities ACP 190 NATO Supp-1 Guide to Spectrum Management in Military Operations EAPC(C)D(2014)0019 NATO/EAPC Action Plan for the Implementation of UNSCR 1325 and Related Resolutions 3000 TC-530/Ser: NR 0034//2100/SHPPX/10/05-102978 NATO Response Force Minimum Military Requirements AFS Vol. IX Allied Command Operations Forces Standards, vol. IX Commercial publications International Organization for Standardization Risk management – Principles and guidelines (ISO 31000-2009(E), 2009) Edition C Version 1 x AJP-3 PREFACE Scope 1. Allied joint publication (AJP)-3(C) Allied Joint Doctrine for the Conduct of Operations is the keystone North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) doctrine for the conduct of joint operations from preparation to termination. AJP-3(C) builds on the principles described by AJP-01(E) Allied Joint Doctrine, is adjacent and closely related to AJP-5 Allied Joint Doctrine for the Planning of Operations, and it is the foundational doctrine for the AJP-3 series. Purpose 2. Though every operation is unique their conduct can be approached in the same manner. AJP-3(C) provides joint commanders and staffs with a common framework to command, coordinate and synchronize Alliance operations. Application 3. AJP-3(C) is intended primarily as guidance for joint NATO commanders and staffs. However, the doctrine is instructive to, and provides a useful framework for operations conducted by a coalition of NATO members, partners and non-NATO nations. It also provides a reference for NATO civilian and non-NATO civilian actors. xi Edition C Version 1 AJP-3 Intentionally blank Edition C Version 1 xii AJP-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of changes vii Related documents ix Preface xi Table of contents xiii Chapter 1 – Fundamentals Section 1 – Introduction 1-1 Operations themes 1-2 Requirements 1-3 NATO Command Structure 1-4 NATO force structure 1-6 Linkage between the NATO Command Structure, NATO force structure headquarters and national headquarters 1-8 Section 2 – Principles and operational considerations of joint and multinational operations 1-9 Principles 1-9 Operational considerations 1-12 Section 3 – Contribution to Allied joint and multinational operations 1-16 NATO’s contribution to a comprehensive approach 1-16 Multinational approach 1-17 Component contribution to joint operations 1-17 Stages of a joint operation 1-20 Operations framework 1-21 Joint functions 1-21 Section 4 – Joint action framework 1-27 Section 5 – Types of operations 1-28 Section 6 – Command and control 1-36 Introduction 1-36 Principles of joint and multinational command 1-36 Chapter 2 – Preparation Section 1 – Introduction 2-1 Section 2 – Forming the joint task force 2-1 NATO forces generation, activation and deployment procedure 2-1 xiii Edition C Version 1 AJP-3 Establishing the joint task force headquarters 2-3 Integrating the components 2-4 Challenges of multinational operations 2-6 Training and training responsibilities 2-7 Section 3 – Pre execution activities 2-8 Organizing the joint operations area 2-10 Strategic deployment and reception, staging, onward movement and integration 2-11 Planning and executing the strategic deployment, reception, staging, onward movement and integration process 2-12 Transfer of authority 2-13 Chapter 3 – Execution Section 1 – Introduction 3-1 Section 2 – Command and control factors 3-1 Section 3 – Operations management 3-4 Introduction 3-4 Battlespace management 3-5 Situational awareness 3-6 Section 4 – Information management 3-7 Section 5 – Joint task force headquarters management processes 3-11 Chapter 4 – Operations assessment Section 1 – Purpose 4-1 Section 2 – Stages of operations assessment 4-2 Section 3 – Operations assessment at the strategic, operational and tactical level 4-2 Chapter 5 – Termination Section 1 – Introduction 5-1 Section 2 – Termination 5-1 Section 3 – Transition 5-1 Assessing transition activities 5-3 Effective transition activities 5-4 Transition risks 5-5 Edition C Version 1 xiv AJP-3 Section 4 – Post termination activities 5-6 Annex A – Joint staff functions General A-1 Principal advisors A-1 Staff structure A-2 Other staff functions A-7 Annex B – Related capabilities to the joint functions Annex C – Battlespace management planning and execution Section 1 – Battlespace and enabling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unlocking NATO's Amphibious Potential
    November 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE J.D. WILLIAMS, GENE GERMANOVICH, STEPHEN WEBBER, GABRIELLE TARINI Unlocking NATO’s Amphibious Potential Lessons from the Past, Insights for the Future orth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members maintain amphibious capabilities that provide versatile and responsive forces for crisis response and national defense. These forces are routinely employed in maritime Nsecurity, noncombatant evacuation operations (NEO), counterterrorism, stability operations, and other missions. In addition to U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) and U.S. Navy forces, the Alliance’s amphibious forces include large ships and associated landing forces from five nations: France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK). Each of these European allies—soon to be joined by Turkey—can conduct brigade-level operations, and smaller elements typically are held at high readiness for immediate response.1 These forces have been busy. Recent exercises and operations have spanned the littorals of West and North Africa, the Levant, the Gulf of Aden and Arabian Sea, the Caribbean, and the Pacific. Given NATO’s ongoing concerns over Russia’s military posture and malign behavior, allies with amphibious capabilities have also been exploring how these forces could contribute to deterrence or, if needed, be employed as part of a C O R P O R A T I O N combined and joint force in a conflict against a highly some respects, NATO’s ongoing efforts harken back to the capable nation-state. Since 2018, NATO’s headquarters Cold War, when NATO’s amphibious forces routinely exer- and various commands have undertaken initiatives and cised in the Mediterranean and North Atlantic as part of a convened working groups to advance the political intent broader strategy to deter Soviet aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Da Armada | 540 Sumário
    Revista da Nº 540 • ANO XLVIII • €1,50 MAIO 2019 • MENSAL ARMADA FUZILEIROS MOÇAMBIQUE 2019 NRP CORTE-REAL ALMIRANTE CHENS 2019 GAN19 CANTO E CASTRO LISBOA REVISTA DA ARMADA | 540 SUMÁRIO 02 Programa Dia da Marinha 2019 NRP CORTE REAL GRUPO AERONAVAL 10 04 Strategia (48) CHARLES DE GAULLE 06 Assistência Humanitária a Moçambique 08 NRP Álvares Cabral – Iniciativa Mar Aberto 19.1 12 Treinar Competências: O simulador como campo de treino 21 Academia de Marinha 22 Direito do Mar e Direito Marítimo (22) 24 Notícias 26 Vigia da História (109) ALMIRANTE 14 CANTO E CASTRO 28 Estórias (49) 30 Serviço & Saúde (5) 31 Saúde para Todos (65) 32 Desporto 33 Quarto de Folga 34 Notícias Pessoais / Convívios / Programa Homenagem aos Combatentes 35 Colóquio "O Mar: Tradições e Desafios" – Programa CC Símbolos Heráldicos CHIEFS OF EUROPEAN NAVIES CHENS 2019 – LISBOA 17 Capa Fuzileiros em Missão Humanitária – Moçambique Revista da ARMADA Publicação Oficial da Marinha Diretor Desenho Gráfico E-mail da Revista da Armada Periodicidade mensal CALM Aníbal José Ramos Borges ASS TEC DES Aida Cristina M.P. Faria [email protected] Nº 540 / Ano XLVIII [email protected] Maio 2019 Chefe de Redação Administração, Redação e Edição CMG Joaquim Manuel de S. Vaz Ferreira Revista da Armada – Edifício das Instalações Paginação eletrónica e produção Revista anotada na ERC Centrais da Marinha – Rua do Arsenal Página Ímpar, Lda. 1149-001 Lisboa – Portugal Depósito Legal nº 55737/92 Redatora Estrada de Benfica, 317 - 1 Fte ISSN 0870-9343 Telef: 21 159 32 54 CTEN TSN-COM Ana Alexandra G. de Brito 1500-074 Lisboa Propriedade Estatuto Editorial Marinha Portuguesa Secretário de Redação www.marinha.pt/pt/Servicos/Paginas/ Tiragem média mensal: NIPC 600012662 SMOR L Mário Jorge Almeida de Carvalho revista-armada.aspx 3800 exemplares MAIO 2019 3 REVISTA DA ARMADA | 540 Str 48 50 ANOS NAS FORÇAS NAVAIS PERMANENTES DA NATO DA GÉNESE ATÉ 1995 “Atuarão como um polícia de turno.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey and Black Sea Security 3
    SIPRI Background Paper December 2018 TURKEY AND SUMMARY w The Black Sea region is BLACK SEA SECURITY experiencing a changing military balance. The six littoral states (Bulgaria, siemon t. wezeman and alexandra kuimova* Georgia, Romania, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine) intensified their efforts to build up their military potential after Russia’s The security environment in the wider Black Sea region—which brings takeover of Crimea and the together the six littoral states (Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, Russia, Turkey start of the internationalized and Ukraine) and a hinterland including the South Caucasus and Moldova— civil war in eastern Ukraine is rapidly changing. It combines protracted conflicts with a significant con- in 2014. ventional military build-up that intensified after the events of 2014: Russia’s Although security in the takeover of Crimea and the start of the internationalized civil war in eastern Black Sea region has always Ukraine.1 Transnational connections between conflicts across the region been and remains important for and between the Black Sea and the Middle East add further dimensions of Turkey, the current Turkish insecurity. As a result, there is a blurring of the conditions of peace, crisis defence policy seems to be and conflict in the region. This has led to an unpredictable and potentially largely directed southwards, high-risk environment in which military forces with advanced weapons, towards the Middle East. including nuclear-capable systems, are increasingly active in close proxim- Russian–Turkish relations have been ambiguous for some years. ity to each other. Turkey has openly expressed In this context, there is an urgent need to develop a clearer understanding concern about perceived of the security dynamics and challenges facing the wider Black Sea region, Russian ambitions in the Black and to explore opportunities for dialogue between the key regional security Sea region and called for a actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 4 2016 Comp Troller
    OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1100 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 -1100 JAN 4 2016 COMP TROLLER MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES DIRECTORS OF THE DOD FIELD ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR, JOINT STAFF COMPTROLLER, UNITED STATES EUROPEAN COMMAND SUBJECT: Updates to Department ofDefense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 11A, Chapter 9, "Support oflnternational Military Activities" This memorandum updates the listing ofNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Force Integration Units and Centers of Excellence, and their assigned administrative agent, as currently published in Table 9-1 ofVolume 11A, Chapter 9. These changes will be incorporated into the next chapter update planned for June 2016. Table 9-1, "International Military Headquarter and Related Agencies and Administrative Agents Responsible for Their Support and for Support to U.S. Elements" is revised to add as A.S.m the Center of Excellence- Energy Security (ESCOE) in Vilnius, Lithuania. This change was requested in Attachment 1. The Air Force will serve as the administrative agent. In addition, Table 9-1 is revised to add six new NATO Force Integration Units (NFIUs) with their associated administrative agents as follows: A.2.g.(1) NFIU Sofia, Bulgaria- Air Force; A.2.g.(2) NFIU Bucharest, Romania-Army; A.4.f.(1) NFIU Tallinn, Estonia-Navy; A.4.f.(2) NFIU Riga, Latvia- Navy; A.4.f.(3) NFIU Vilnius, Lithuania-Air Force; and A.4.f.(4) NFIU Bydgoszcz, Poland-Army. These changes were requested in Attachment 2. A draft update of Table 9-1 reflecting these changes is provided as Attachment 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Maritime Command HQ MARCOM News Release
    Allied Maritime Command HQ MARCOM News Release Nov. 1, 2017 Operation Sea Guardian Patrols the Eastern Mediterranean MEDITERRANEAN SEA - Four NATO ships and one submarine, provided by Bulgaria, Italy, Romania and Turkey, in cooperation with maritime patrol aircraft from Greece and Turkey, conducted focused security patrols in international waters of the eastern Mediterranean Sea as part of NATO’s maritime counter-terrorism operation, Operation Sea Guardian (OSG) October 14 to 30, 2017. The focused security patrol concentrated on gathering pattern-of-life information about maritime activities in the international waters of the eastern Mediterranean Sea from off the coast of Syria to off the coast of Israel and Lebanon in support of the Operation’s Maritime Situational Awareness (MSA) task. While operating in the focus area, the ships identified 900 motor vessels, from large commercial shipping vessels to smaller fishing vessels. The group hailed 39 of those ships and were invited onboard four ships in support of building a better understanding of the activities occurring at sea in the eastern Mediterranean. The group worked in coordination with support from NATO assigned Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA) to cover the area and monitor the maritime activities across the area. This information is relayed back to Allied Maritime Command and added to the NATO Recognized Maritime Picture (RMP), a common picture available to all Allies. In support of the operation, both Greece and Turkey provided tankers, HS Prometheus and TCG Akar respectively,
    [Show full text]
  • Nato Unclassified 1 Nato Unclassified Headquarters
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED HEADQUARTERS, ALLIED MARITIME COMMAND Atlantic Building, Northwood Headquarters, Sandy Lane Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 3HP United Kingdom Our Ref: Tel: +44 (0)1923 956577 NCN: 57+ 56577 Date: 02 July 2019 Email: [email protected] IAW distribution NATO SHIPPING CENTRE NEWSLETTER MAY – JUNE 2019 Allied Maritime Command (MARCOM) conducted a change of command ceremony on 20 May at Northwood Headquarters to mark the change of senior leadership at the command. General Tod D. Wolters, NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, presided over the ceremony as Vice Admiral Keith E. Blount, CB OBE assumed command from Vice Admiral Clive Johnstone, KBE CE who led NATO’s only standing Maritime Component Command since 2015. NATO MARCOM continues its operational activities highlighted by the training activities of NATO’s Standing Naval Forces and Maritime Security Operations. Maritime Security Operations During May and June 2019, 68 and 56 warships respectively, from France, Turkey, Spain, Greece, Canada, Albania, the Netherlands, Denmark, the United Kingdom and Germany took part in Operation SEA GUARDIAN in the Mediterranean, supported by flights of NATO Airborne Early Warning (AEW) and Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA). The AEW flights were provided by NATO’s own assets, while the MPA flights were provided by Greece, Spain, Italy, Turkey, France, Portugal and USA. Submarines under NATO and national operational command have also provided critical support to this Maritime Security Operation. 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED Operation SEA GUARDIAN is an effective way for NATO to maintain maritime situational awareness in the Mediterranean, through the knowledge of the Maritime Pattern of Life and detecting anomalies to fight crime and counter terrorism at sea.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Virtual Maritime Security Regimes Roundtable Report of Proceedings
    Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence 2020 VIRTUAL MARITIME SECURITY REGIMES ROUNDTABLE REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS Disclaimer: The opinions, conclusions and recommendations expressed or implied within are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, NATO or Allied Command Transformation. This product is not a doctrinal publication and is not staffed but is the perception of the author from the Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence (CJOS COE). The intent is to share knowledge, support discussion and impart information in an expeditious manner. Transforming Allied Maritime Potential into Reality 1 This document was prepared by: CDR Jorge Martínez, ESP N. This document was directed by: CAPT Todd Bonnar, MSC, RCN. Enquiries: Please direct enquiries to: Combined Joint Operations from the Sea Centre of Excellence [email protected] or Phone: +1-757-836-2440 Copyright: This paper is copyrighted. Portions of the document may be quoted or reproduced without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Any comprehensive reproduction requires written permission of the publisher. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Background……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Narrative ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Structure / Methodology ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Landpower in NATO Vital for U.S
    Association of the United States Army Voice for the Army—Support for the Soldier October 2014 Strategic Landpower in NATO Vital for U.S. Security Allied Land Command is the leading advocate for soldiers and land forces in NATO, responsible for ensuring their effectiveness and interoperability. Lieutenant General Frederick B. Hodges, USA Commander, NATO Allied Land Command* Introduction Today’s global security environment is defined by its complexity, unpredictability and the increasing momentum of human interaction; it is the essence of the joint and combined force to remain trained and fully ready to meet any challenge. Strategic land- power—the application of land forces (Army, Marine Corps and special operations forces) toward achiev- ing strategic outcomes across the range of military operations—provides a critical hedge against this un- certain future. The role of strategic landpower is to shape and prevail within the human domain, creating conditions that stabilize people’s daily dealings with one another and generate momentum to bring about and combined-arms capabilities to dominate the en- the nation’s strategic objectives. vironment; and winning decisively when called. The Army is sustaining its commitment to maintain strong Even as the Department of Defense (DoD) rebal- relationships and interoperability with its proven ances its posture to the Asia–Pacific region, Europe partners in NATO. A large part of this effort is on- will continue to require a strong commitment from going by means of NATO’s Allied Land Command the United States, including responsive, adaptive and (LANDCOM). Established in 2012, it is the newest regionally engaged forces to maintain security and single-service command of NATO’s military arm and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Joint Doctrine for Air-Maritime Coordination
    NATO STANDARD AJP-3.3.3 ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR AIR-MARITIME COORDINATION Edition A Version 1 DECEMBER 2014 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION ALLIED JOINT PUBLICATION Published by the NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) © NATO/OTAN INTENTIONALLY BLANK NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO) NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) NATO LETTER OF PROMULGATION 2 December 2014 1. The enclosed Allied Joint Publication AJP-3.3.3, Edition A, Version 1, ALLIED JOINT DOCTRINE FOR AIR-MARITIME COORDINATION, approved by the nations in the MCJSB, is promulgated herewith. The agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 3703. 2. AJP-3.3.3, Edition A, Version 1, is effective upon receipt. It supersedes AJP-3.3.3, which shall be destroyed in accordance with the local procedure for destruction of documents. 3. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used commercially, adapted, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. With the exception of commercial sales, this does not apply to member nations and Partnership for Peace countries, or NATO commands and bodies. 4. This publication shall be handled in accordance with C-M(2002)60. , Edvardas MAZEIKIS Major General, LTUAF Director, NATO Standardization Office INTENTIONALLY BLANK AJP-3.3.3 Allied Joint Publication-3.3.3 Allied Joint Doctrine for Air-Maritime Coordination Edition A Version 1 Allied Joint Publication-3.3.3 (AJP-3.3.3), dated December 2014, is promulgated as directed by the Chiefs of Staff Director Concepts and Doctrine I Edition A, Version 1 AJP-3.3.3 INTENTIONALLY BLANK II Edition A, Version 1 AJP-3.3.3 RECORD OF RESERVATIONS CHAPTER RECORD OF RESERVATION BY NATIONS General DEU, USA Note: The reservations listed on this page include only those that were recorded at time of promulgation and may not be complete.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-Cutting-The-Bow-Wave.Pdf
    TRANSFORMING ALLIED MARITIME POTENTIAL INTO REALITY Disclaimer: The opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, CJOS COE, NATO, ACT or any other government agency. This product is not a doctrinal publication and is not staffed but is the perception of those individuals involved in military exercises, activities and real-world events. The intent is to share knowledge, support discus- sion and impart information in an expeditious manner. Front Cover: F-35C prepares to make landing on USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72). Source: MCSN Amber Smalley Back Cover: F-35s onboard HMS Queen Elizabeth. Source: UK Defence Journal 2 www.cjoscoe.org Publisher’s Note Message from the Director Development of the NATO VADM Bruce H. Lindsey, USN 38 Amphibious Task Force utting the Bow Wave is 4 CDR Jose Conde, PRTM LTCOL Jos Schooneman, RNLM an annual publication Message from the Deputy Director Anti-Satellite Capabilities and Military by Combined Joint C CDRE Tom Guy, RN 41 Operations Operations from the Sea Centre 6 CDR Neculai Grigore, RON of Excellence, United States “Red Storm Rising” Basics of Space Support to NATO Fleet Forces Command, Building CAPT Todd Bonnar, MSC, RCN 45 Operations NH-39 in Norfolk, Virginia. For 9 CDR Robert Waggoner, USN publication purposes, all articles NATO’s Return to the North Atlantic Air Defense in the North and materials submitted become Mr. Stephen J. Flanagan LTCOL Roberto Patti, ITAF the sole property of CJOS COE.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Selective Sea Blindness—Assessing the Alliance's New
    Naval War College Review Volume 72 Article 4 Number 3 Summer 2019 2019 NATO’s Selective Sea Blindness—Assessing the Alliance’s New Navies Thomas-Durell Young Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Young, Thomas-Durell (2019) "NATO’s Selective Sea Blindness—Assessing the Alliance’s New Navies," Naval War College Review: Vol. 72 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Young: NATO’s Selective Sea Blindness—Assessing the Alliance’s New Navie NATO’S SELECTIVE SEA BLINDNESS Assessing the Alliance’s New Navies Thomas-Durell Young overnments of the countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are guilty of inattention to, and sea blindness in, modernizing their Gnavies� While among “old” NATO navies this reality is understood and docu- mented widely, the state of development and readiness of those navies considered “new” receives considerably less attention�1 On examination, these new navies are deficient in building integrated capabilities, ensuring common operating proce- dures, projecting battlespace awareness, and accomplishing interoperability in all maritime combat domains� This is because of a combination
    [Show full text]
  • Command and Control of a Multibrigade Alliance Task Force
    NATO’s Amphibious Forces Command and Control of a Multibrigade Alliance Task Force Gene Germanovich, J.D. Williams, Stacie L. Pettyjohn, David A. Shlapak, Anthony Atler, Bradley Martin C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2928 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0236-3 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Photo by Robert L. Kunzig , NATOChannel. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface In 2017 and 2018, the RAND Corporation designed and facilitated a series of wargames and seminars on behalf of the Amphibious Leaders Expeditionary Symposium (ALES), a forum for general and flag officers to discuss opportunities for improved interoper- ability, command and control (C2), and utilization of amphibious forces within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
    [Show full text]