DOCSLIB.ORG

17H30 : Accueil 18H00 : Présentation 19H00 : Apéro / Discussions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
17H30 : Accueil 18H00 : Présentation 19H00 : Apéro / Discussions Les Groupwares Open Source 17h30 : Accueil 18h00 : Présentation 19h00 : Apéro / Discussions RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Sommaire - Présentation Evolix et Actualités - Qu'est-ce qu'un Groupware ? - Les protocoles, les standards - Les "clients" Groupware - Les Groupwares Open Source - Focus sur Zimbra - Témoignage de l'École Centrale de Marseille - Conclusion - Nouvelles offres Evolix RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Présentation et Actualités 1/2 Evolix Infogérance d'infrastructures Open Source Chiffres clés : Créé en 2004 7 personnes + de 200 serveurs infogérés RCP couvrant son métier d©infogérance RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Présentation et Actualités 2/2 News Evolix - Planet Evolix : http://planet.evolix.org/ - Dernières références... - WIP : infra EVOLIX-MNT, EvoLinux, Forge RDV Techno Evolix - 4ème édition - Rencontres clients/amis/prospects autour d'un sujet technique RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Qu'est-ce qu'un Groupware ? Un Groupware est un logiciel favorisant le travail collaboratif. RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Def. Groupware Pour mieux définir un Groupware, parlons des autres technologies que l©on retrouve dans un SI : GED (Gestion Electronique des Documents) : Alfresco, MS Project ERP (Logiciel de Gestion d©Entreprise) : OpenERP, OpenBravo, Dolibarr, SAGE, Ciel CRM (Gestion de la Relation Client) : SugarCRM, vTiger, Salesforce Project Management : Trac, Redmine, MS Project Gestion des identifiants/authentification : annuaires (LDAP,AD), SSO (CAS, Shibboleth, Kerberos) Messagerie : Postfix/Dovecot, Exchange, Lotus Notes ...de plus en plus de ces logiciels couvrent plusieurs domaines. Et ils le font plus ou moins bien. RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Def. Groupware La solution est-elle d©avoir un super logiciel qui gère tout cela ? NON. Nous pensons qu©un SI optimal est constitué de « différentes » briques avec une INTEROPÉRABILITÉ ! Chaque brique se « concentre » sur sa fonctionnalité et se contente de bien la faire (philosophie Unix). RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Def. Groupware Dans cette optique notre définition subjective d©un Groupware est surtout la notion de calendrier, avec partage et synchronisation. En découle les fonctionalités liées : gestion des contacts et gestion des listes de tâches. RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Def. Groupware Intégration avec la messagerie ? Messagerie Contacts Invitations aux agendas Contacts Partage des agendas Messagerie Gestion des notifications d©agenda Donc c©est fortement lié... ... mais pas obligatoire. Surtout que les Groupwares Open Source gèrent mal la messagerie :-( RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Interopératibilité : protocoles, standards Import/export : iCalendar/ICS, VCF Protocoles réseau : REST, SOAP, IMAP Protocoles synchronisation : ActiveSync, CalDAV, SyncML RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Protocoles, standards Les seuls véritables standards sont les formats d©import/export. Le meilleur exemple est iCalendar/ICS décrit dans la RFC2445/5545. - Pour l©import ou l©export d©un calendrier - Accès en HTTP(S) d©un calendrier en read-only - L©envoi d©invitation ou de notifications RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Protocoles, standards BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:Groupware-Open-Source VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VEVENT UID:af294b2f-d149-4d19-b7d0-9d0e39ee2069 SUMMARY:RDV techno Evolix "Groupwares Open Source" LOCATION:Locaux Evolix ORGANIZER;CN=Evolix:mailto:[email protected] STATUS:CONFIRMED DTSTART;TZID="Europe/Paris":20110414T173000 DTEND;TZID="Europe/Paris":20110414T190000 STATUS:CONFIRMED CLASS:PUBLIC RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU BEGIN:VALARM ACTION:DISPLAY TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT59M DESCRIPTION:Reminder END:VALARM END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Protocoles, standards Dans la pratique, cela peut tout de même poser des problèmes ! - Des champs posent problème : RDATE vs RRULE - Des clients respectent mal la norme - Des clients utilisent des champs spécifiques : X-... - Selon les moyens d©accès (SOAP, CalDAV), des serveurs peuvent ne pas les interpréter correctement RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Protocoles, standards Stockage interne des informations ? Aucun standard... Chaque groupware a son schéma SQL ou autre... Il faut faire confiance à l©import/export ou faire du reverse-ingineering RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Protocoles, standards SyncML Langage de synchronisation de données Très présent sous Nokia, mais pas par défaut sur Android et iPhone Implémentation connue : Funambol, Horde RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Protocoles, standards Exchange ActiveSync En décembre 2008, Microsoft annonce « l©ouverture » d©ActiveSync (pour l©iPhone selon la légende) Les spécifications sont + ou ± claires. Toujours soumis à licences ! Apparemment implémentations possibles... en dehors des USA ! Implémenté par Apple, Google, Nokia, etc. RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Protocoles, standards CalDAV Extension du protocole WebDAV normalisé dans la RFC3744 Utilisation des Free/busy URL Ne gère « que » le calendrier Implémentations : Thunderbird/Lightning, iCal, Google Calendar, iPhone RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Clients Groupware - MS Outlook - Thunderbird / Lightning - Interface web - Smartphones (iPhone, Android, Windows Phone) RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Clients Groupware MS Outlook - Messagerie : SMTP/POP/IMAP... ou MAPI - Contacts et carnet d©adresses (consultation LDAP possible) - Calendriers - Tâches - Offline Pour un groupware Open Source, il faut ajouter un plugin... dont la qualité varie ! Toltec, Bynari, Zarafa, Zimbra, Funambol, Open-Xchange, etc. RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Clients Groupware Thunderbird / Lightning - Messagerie (SMTP/POP/IMAP) - Contacts (LDAP) - Lightning : plugin pour gestion des calendriers (CalDAV, ICS, etc.) - Offline - Plugins : Funambol, Zindus RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Clients Groupware Interface web - En général, le moyen le plus fiable pour accéder à un Groupware - Evolix utilise eGroupware depuis sa v1.0 (2005), groupware en mode 100% web (ou quasiment) - La qualité et l©ergonomie varient fortement d©un logiciel à un autre... - Pas de offline - Versions HTML / AJAX / mobile - Fonctionnalités « sexy » (Google calendar) : drag&drop, gestion des conflits, multi-calendar, transformer un mail en RDV, etc. RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Clients Groupware Iphone / iOS4 Pour ActiveSync : - multi-calendars (uniquement ses propres calendriers) - peu de bugs remontés - mode PUSH très rapide - Gestion des contacts, accès « contacts entreprise » - Pas de gestion des tâches via ActiveSync RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Clients Groupware RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Clients Groupware RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Clients Groupware Android Ça fonctionne via ActiveSync (ouf!). Mais ce n©est pas parfait : - pas de multi-calendars - PUSH parfois peu réactif (?) - Pas de suppression - Soucis avec l©implémentation d©ActiveSync (exemple : modifier un événement privé le rend public!) RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Groupwares Open Source - OBM - Zimbra - Z-Push (Zarafa, Horde, Kolab) - eGroupWare / phpGroupware - SoGo - Open-Xchange - Tine 2.0 RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Groupwares Open Source egroupWare / phpGroupWare RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Groupwares Open Source Horde RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Groupwares Open Source OBM - Implémentation ActiveSync «en cours de dev » - Plus : Modulaire et basé sur des briques Open Source - Editeur : Linagora Qui ? INSERM RDV Techno Evolix ± Les Groupwares Open Source - 14 Avril 2011 - [email protected] - http://www.evolix.fr/ Groupwares Open Source
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Outlook™ & Insightconnector™ with Mdaemon
    Using Outlook™ & InsightConnector™ with MDaemon 6.0 Alt-N Technologies, Ltd 1179 Corporate Drive West, #103 Arlington, TX 76006 Tel: (817) 652-0204 © 2002 Alt-N Technologies. All rights reserved. Outlook™ is a trademark of Microsoft, Inc. InsightConnector™ is a trademark of Bynari, Inc. Other product and company names mentioned in this document may be trademarks. Contents Abstract................................................................................................................3 Outlook and Exchange Server Sharing.............................................................4 Sharing with InsightConnector™.......................................................................6 Installing, Configuring and Using InsightConnector™....................................7 Configuring MDaemon.....................................................................................7 Installing InsightConnector...............................................................................8 Configuring Outlook .........................................................................................9 Configuring InsightConnector ........................................................................10 Creating, Sharing and Synchronizing Folders................................................11 Creating....................................................................................................11 Sharing and Synchronizing.......................................................................12 InsightConnector™ 2 Alt-N Technologies Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • Insightserver ® 3.5.5 I N S I G H T S E R V E
    Bynari I n s I g h t S e r v e r ® 3.5 InsightServer ® 3.5.5 The Linux Based Mail and Messaging Server As with previous versions, InsightServer 3.5 delivers a Linux based mail services product that provides a functional alternative to Microsoft Exchange and existing enterprise messaging servers. However, InsightServer utilizes open standards and centralized architecture that are superior to other messaging servers. This latest version of InsightServer adds additional ease of management, integrated security, and transparent user interface. Simple Migration Reliable and Cost Efficient Version 3.5.5 eliminates downtime and training InsightServer offers a proven platform for for InsightServer migration. Bynari’s new deploying mission critical messaging solutions at technology, InsightConnector allows Outlook an affordable price. Spiraling costs of proprietary users to utilize facilities across all versions of messaging and collaboration products from Microsoft Outlook. This functionality allows for vendors such as Microsoft have caused many transparent migration for the desktop user and organizations to worry about their infrastructures. complete compatibility with all versions of InsightServer provides significant cost savings for Exchange to allow phased, mixed or total any organization while allowing for network migrations. In addition, companies with IMAP stability. Customers looking for an alternative to servers can use the InsightConnector to allow legacy software will find Bynari, combined with any Outlook user to have email, folders, and Linux, on IBM eServers, a very attractive option calendaring full-functionality. Migration tool using whether it is for a single xSeries Server or for large java is available for transparent migration of user enterprise server consolidation on an IBM zSeries.
    [Show full text]
  • New News About Linux on Z.PRZ
    IBM IT Education Services L02 Klaus Goebel [email protected] New News about Linux on zSeries zSeries Expo November 10 - 14, 2003 | Hilton, Las Vegas, NV © 2003 IBM Corporation 1 Linux on zSeries Linux on zSeries Trademarks The following are trademarks of the International Business Machines Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. DB2* IBM logo* Tivoli Storage Manager DB2 Connect IMS TotalStorage DB2 Universal Database iSeries VSE/ESA DRDA* MQSeries WebSphere* e-business logo* pSeries xSeries HiperSockets S/390* z/OS IBM* SecureWay* z/VM IBM eServer Tivoli* zSeries * Registered trademarks of IBM Corporation The following are trademarks or registered trademarks of other companies. Intel is a trademark of the Intel Corporation in the United States and other countries. Java and all Java-related trademarks and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc., in the United States and other countries. Lotus, Notes, and Domino are trademarks or registered trademarks of Lotus Development Corporation. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. Microsoft, Windows and Windows NT are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. SET and Secure Electronic Transaction are trademarks owned by SET Secure Electronic Transaction LLC. UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group in the United States and other countries. * All other products may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Notes: Performance is in Internal Throughput Rate (ITR) ratio based on measurements and projections using standard IBM benchmarks in a controlled environment. The actual throughput that any user will experience will vary depending upon considerations such as the amount of multiprogramming in the user's job stream, the I/O configuration, the storage configuration, and the workload processed.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Messaging with Exchange Server 2003
    c13619905.fm Page 293 Monday, February 9, 2004 12:39 PM Part IV Client Security c13619905.fm Page 294 Monday, February 9, 2004 12:39 PM c13619905.fm Page 295 Monday, February 9, 2004 12:39 PM 295 Chapter 13 Securing Outlook Technology—like science—is neutral all through, providing only means of control applicable to any purpose, indifferent to all. —John von Neumann E-mail-transmitted malware is an unfortunate fact of life. Malicious code attached to e-mail messages can contain worms or viruses; once one machine becomes infected, highly interconnected e-mail systems allow malware to spread very quickly. How’d we get here? Customers asked for advanced customization features, so Microsoft delivered them as part of the Microsoft Office system. The first really bothersome e-mail viruses were created and spread using the Office macro lan- guage; more recently, the mix of malware has shifted toward attacks that exploit vulnerabilities in Microsoft Internet Explorer. The integration between Microsoft Outlook, other Office applications, and the Microsoft Windows operating system delivers a great set of benefits, but some malicious people have used those features for ill—no different than almost any other technology. Completely disallowing all forms of scripts and executables is a cure worse than the disease; the ideal remedy would be to teach users not to open untrusted attachments. However, that assumes that users will always do what you tell them to do, and we know better. Fortu- nately, a combination of Outlook features and administrative savvy can be applied to minimize, if not eliminate, the vulnerability.
    [Show full text]
  • List Software Pengganti Windows Ke Linux
    Tabel Padanan Aplikasi Windows di Linux Untuk Migrasi Selasa, 18-08-2009 Kesulitan besar dalam melakukan migrasi dari Windows ke Linux adalah mencari software pengganti yang berkesesuaian. Berikut ini adalah tabel padanan aplikasi Windows di Linux yang disusun dalam beberapa kategori. Nama Program Windows Linux 1) Networking. 1) Netscape / Mozilla. 2) Galeon. 3) Konqueror. 4) Opera. [Prop] Internet Explorer, 5) Firefox. Web browser Netscape / Mozilla, Opera 6) Nautilus. [Prop], Firefox, ... 7) Epiphany. 8) Links. (with "-g" key). 9) Dillo. 10) Encompass. 1) Links. 1) Links 2) ELinks. Console web browser 2) Lynx 3) Lynx. 3) Xemacs + w3. 4) w3m. 5) Xemacs + w3. 1) Evolution. 2) Netscape / Mozilla/Thunderbird messenger. 3) Sylpheed / Claws Mail. 4) Kmail. Outlook Express, 5) Gnus. Netscape / Mozilla, 6) Balsa. Thunderbird, The Bat, 7) Bynari Insight GroupWare Suite. Email client Eudora, Becky, Datula, [Prop] Sylpheed / Claws Mail, 8) Arrow. Opera 9) Gnumail. 10) Althea. 11) Liamail. 12) Aethera. 13) MailWarrior. 14) Opera. 1) Evolution. Email client / PIM in MS 2) Bynari Insight GroupWare Suite. Outlook Outlook style [Prop] 3) Aethera. 4) Sylpheed. 5) Claws Mail 1) Sylpheed. 2) Claws Mail Email client in The Bat The Bat 3) Kmail. style 4) Gnus. 5) Balsa. 1) Pine. [NF] 2) Mutt. Mutt [de], Pine, Pegasus, Console email client 3) Gnus. Emacs 4) Elm. 5) Emacs. 1) Knode. 2) Pan. 1) Agent [Prop] 3) NewsReader. 2) Free Agent 4) Netscape / Mozilla Thunderbird. 3) Xnews 5) Opera [Prop] 4) Outlook 6) Sylpheed / Claws Mail. 5) Netscape / Mozilla Console: News reader 6) Opera [Prop] 7) Pine. [NF] 7) Sylpheed / Claws Mail 8) Mutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration from Windows to Linux for a Small Engineering Firm "A&G Associates"
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 2004 Migration from Windows to Linux for a small engineering firm "A&G Associates" Trimbak Vohra Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Vohra, Trimbak, "Migration from Windows to Linux for a small engineering firm A&G" Associates"" (2004). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Migration from Windows to Linux for a Small Engineering Firm "A&G Associates" (H ' _T ^^L. WBBmBmBBBBmb- Windows Linux by Trimbak Vohra Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Information Technology Rochester Institute of Technology B. Thomas Golisano College of Computing and Information Sciences Date: December 2, 2004 12/B2/28B2 14:46 5854752181 RIT INFORMATION TECH PAGE 02 Rochester Institute of Teehnology B. Thomas Golisano College of Computing and Information Sciences Master of Science in Information Technology Thesis Approval Form Student Name: Trimbak Vohra Thesis Title: Migration from Windows to Unux for a Small Engineeriog Firm "A&G Associates" Thesis Committee Name Signature Date Luther Troell luther IrQell, Ph.D ttL ",j7/Uy Chair G. L. Barido Prof. ~~orge Barido ? - Dec:. -cl7' Committee Member Thomas Oxford Mr. Thomas OxfocQ \ 2. L~( Q~ Committee Member Thesis Reproduction Permission Form Rochester Institute of Technology B. Thomas Golisano College of Computing and Information Sciences Master of Science in Information Technology Migration from Windows to Linux for a Small Engineering Firm "A&G Associates" I,Trimbak Vohra, hereby grant permission to the Wallace Library of the Rochester Institute of Technology to reproduce my thesis in whole or in part.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalendáře a Plánování Času Pro Linux ... Jde To?
    Kalendáře a plánování času pro Linux ... jde to? Pavel Tuma & Michal Altmann [email protected] [email protected] 12% 34% 22% 32% App Web Plugin Devel Server Žádné kalendářové servery? Ale ano ... Samostatné Platformy Collaboration Služby Apple iCal Server Chandler eGroupware Google Calendar Bedework Zarafa OpenExchange iCloud DAViCal Kolab Horde ownCloud Dingo Bynari BCS Zimbra Fruux Baikal Kerio Connect Oracle Beehive mod_caldav IceWarp Scalix Radicale Synovel CommunigatePro SabreDAV Ale pojďme postupně ... Aplikace desktop Evolution Mozilla KOrganizer Evolution Konzistentní UI Sdílení kalendářů Přílohy Druhy událostí Možnosti pozvánek Nelze řadit seznam Mozilla Thunderbird + Lightning Více platforem Sdílení kalendářů Otočený pohled? UI Přílohy Webové kalendáře Roundcube Zimbra Google Roundcube Existuje a funguje Funkce Není integrováno Zimbra Funkce Přeplácané UI Drobná vylepšení Google Calendar Podpora v aplikacích Systém kalendářů UI A co tedy serverová část ... Přehled Samostatné Platformy Collaboration Služby Apple iCal Server Chandler eGroupware Google Calendar Bedework Zarafa OpenExchange iCloud DAViCal Kolab Horde ownCloud Dingo Bynari BCS Zimbra Fruux Baikal Kerio Connect Oracle Beehive mod_caldav IceWarp Scalix Radicale Synovel CommunigatePro SabreDAV Integrovaná řešení v SMB 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% <100 16% 20% 64% 100-299 28% 35% 37% Používá Plánuje Neplánuje SMB Group, C&C study 2011 CalDav 2003 Draft 2007 RFC4791 CalConnect Google, Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, Nokia, Mozilla iCalendar + iTip +iMip CalDav Scheduling WebDav
    [Show full text]
  • Umzugsplaner Groupware-Migration
    05/2013 Tipps zur Datenmigration bei Groupware Titelthema Umzugsplaner Groupware-Migration 20 Microsofts Produktpolitik treibt kontinuierlich viele Anwender vom Windows Small Business Server auf eine freie Groupware. Aber auch so manche funktionsarme Cloudlösung legt einen Umstieg nahe. Bei der Migration der Daten gibt es jedoch einiges zu sortieren, das über die bloße Technik hinausgeht. Tim Schürmann, Markus Feilner www.linux-magazin.de 25 Prozent Ähnlichkeiten mit früheren Projekten auf“, warnt Michael Kromer (Abbildung 1) vom Groupwarehersteller Zarafa (Abbildung 2, [1]). Er mahnt zur Geduld: „Während der Mi- gration sollten alle Beteiligten Ruhe be- wahren, gerade wenn unvorhergesehene Probleme auftreten. Das Unter- oder gar Abbrechen einer laufenden Migration auf- grund von Ungeduld zählt zu den absolut typischen Migrationsfehlern.“ Auch Cornelius Weiss (Abbildung 3), Entwicklungsleiter bei Metaways, der Firma hinter Tine 2.0 (Abbildung 4, [2]) preist Ruhe, Geduld und Beharr- lichkeit als die obersten Tugenden: „Ich habe kaum eine Migration erlebt, wo es © Jean-Marie Guyon , 123RF.com Guyon © Jean-Marie nicht auch zwischendurch mal Zweifel am Gesamtprojekt gab.“ Sie gehören zu den komplexesten He- durch deren Hersteller – und genau das Und FSFE-Urgestein Georg Greve (Abbil- rausforderungen, die sich in der Unter- geschieht in dieser Branche derzeit: Mehr dung 5), Mitgründer der Kolab Systems nehmens-IT finden: Groupwaremaschi- und mehr wandern Kunden vom lokalen AG (Abbildung 6, [3]) sagt: „Die Technik nen. Meist werkelt Microsofts Exchange Server in die Cloud und – nicht selten ist immer lösbar, das ist nie das wahre auf den kombinierten Mail-, Adressbuch- gleichzeitig – von proprietären Produkten Problem. Aber deutlich leichter tut sich, und Kalenderservern. Zu den ohnehin zu Open-Source- oder zumindest OSS- wer von vornherein auf Open Source und schon ausreichend komplizierten drei Ba- basierten Angeboten.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux Client Migration Cookbook - a Practical Planning and Implementation Guide for Migrating to Desktop Linux
    Front cover Linux Client Migrationration Cookbook A Practical Planning and Implementation Guide for Migrating to Desktop Linux For anyone who is exploring or planning for a Linux desktop migration Provides in-depth detail on the technical and organizational challenges Includes methods for planning and implementation Chris Almond Art Cannon Jeroen van Hoof Oliver Mark Christian Patsch Thomas Schwaller Sekhar Vaddadi ibm.com/redbooks International Technical Support Organization Linux Client Migration Cookbook - A Practical Planning and Implementation Guide for Migrating to Desktop Linux December 2004 SG24-6380-00 Note: Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in “Notices” on page xv. First Edition (December 2004) © Copyright International Business Machines Corporation 2004. All rights reserved. Note to U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights -- Use, duplication or disclosure restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Contents Figures . ix Tables . xiii Notices . xv Trademarks . xvi Preface . xix The team that wrote this redbook. xix Acknowledgements . xxi Become a published author . xxi Comments welcome. xxii Part 1. Choosing Linux. 1 Chapter 1. Introduction. 1 1.1 The migration landscape today . 2 1.2 Identifying suitable environments . 3 1.3 Strategic context . 3 1.4 Client environments. 5 1.5 Why Linux . 5 1.6 Linux overview and distribution choices . 6 1.6.1 Licensing . 7 1.7 The rest of this book . 8 Chapter 2. The case for migration . 11 2.1 Why migrate . 12 2.1.1 Desktop security . 12 2.1.2 Costs related to Linux client . 14 2.1.3 Manageability of the Linux client .
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Groupware Am Beispiel Kolab
    FOM Fachhochschule für Oekonomie & Management Essen / Neuss Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades des Diplom-Informatikers Open Source Groupware am Beispiel Kolab Betreuer: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Torsten Finke Autor: Magnus Stoermer Kontakt: [email protected] Veröffentlichung unter der Creative Commons Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/de/ Inhaltsverzeichnis Abbildungsverzeichnis V Tabellenverzeichnis VI Abkürzungsverzeichnis VII 1 Einführung 1 1.1 Motivation ................................ 1 1.2 Zielgruppe und Umfeld ......................... 1 1.3 Struktur dieser Arbeit .......................... 1 1.4 Konventionen .............................. 2 1.5 Einführung von Begriffen ........................ 3 2 Groupware 4 2.1 Definition Groupware und CSCW ................... 4 2.1.1 Klassifikation von CSCW-Systemen .............. 5 2.1.1.1 Klassifikation nach Art und Grad der Unterstützung 5 2.1.1.2 Klassifikation nach räumlicher und zeitlicher Tren- nung ......................... 7 2.1.1.3 Klassifikation unter Berücksichtigung der Vorherse- hbarkeit ....................... 8 2.2 Betrieblicher Nutzen von Groupware .................. 8 2.3 Funktionen von Groupware und bekannte Vertreter .......... 10 2.4 Ansätze von Open Source Groupware ................. 11 3 Informationen zu Kolab 14 3.1 Entstehung ............................... 14 3.2 Der Kolab-Server ............................ 15 3.3 Protokolle und Standards ........................ 16 Inhaltsverzeichnis II 3.3.1 SSL/TLS ............................ 18 3.3.2 IMAP
    [Show full text]
  • Intricacies and Aiding Software Tools Based on Expected Characteristics
    Article No.12 CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH: INTRICACIES AND AIDING SOFTWARE TOOLS BASED ON EXPECTED CHARACTERISTICS Dr. Munish Sabharwal Executive Director & Professor, KITE Group of Institutions, Meerut (U.P.) Abstract: The research work was conducted with the objectives to find the intricacies faced by students, research practitioners and professionalsduring their research and to suggest the best software alternatives for each category of problems faced by them, based on expected characteristics. Thestudy is intended to help researchersfrom diverse fields, especially those not belonging to information technology and its allied background. This study was pursued by the researcher collecting firsthand information for primary data through a face- to face interview of students, research practitioners and professionals from diverse fields using a structured open ended questionnaire querying about the intricacies faced by them during their research and the characteristics expected by them in the software aiding in research. The analysis is performed in three stages; at the first stage the researcher performs thematic textual analysis on the responses to the questionnaire, short listing the intricacies faced by researchers during their research and the characteristics expected by them in the software aiding in research. Secondly, a keyword search is performed on the shortlisted intricaciesto find the categories of software required to aid the researchers for each type of problem faced by them and then find software alternatives for each category of software along with a brief functional minutiae. Finally theresearcher conducts a thorough study of the related literature, websites, brochure of software companies as well as their products and services and also appliesobservation and application method examining the various short listed software alternatives for each category based on expected characteristics to suggests the best software alternatives for each category of intricacies faced by researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux Strategies and Solutions Linux Server Suppliers Contend for Leadership
    Linux Strategies and Solutions Linux Server Suppliers Contend for Leadership Pierre Fricke, Executive Vice President, Web Application and PLM Infrastructure EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Linux has become a mainstream operating environment for infrastructure solutions, “edge of network” applications, development platforms, and technical computing. Nearly all platform suppliers across the industry have embraced Linux and have been enhancing and tuning their strategies to meet their customer requirements. However, a few leading system suppliers view Linux as disruptive, developed by the iconoclastic open source process. The danger they see is that the proprietary nature of the server industry will disappear, opening wide new choices to customers. But the open source arena can also open new horizons. Some see Linux as an open enabler of and entrée to new markets such as pervasive computing devices. All of the vendors studied maintain hybrid strategies, offering choice to their customers. With the continued significant investment by all of these major vendors, Linux’s evolution and maturity is proceeding at a rapid pace. Indeed, Linux offers the opportunity to drive commodity Intel-based technology server building blocks into the mainstream enterprise IT application space. For example, early adopters are already building significant SAP R/3 and Oracle deployments on Linux. This report reviews the strategies of five leading Linux system suppliers: Compaq, Dell, HP, IBM, and Sun Microsystems. POSITIONING AND STRATEGIES Reversing recent history, all of these leading suppliers hold aggressive positions on Linux. Each has built relationships with the leading Linux distribution suppliers or at least the Linux community in the case of Sun Cobalt. Since Linux has enjoyed much of its success in the Internet and networking community, all of the suppliers positioned their Linux offerings initially to address the Internet infrastructure segment, which has grown into the “edge of the network” segment.
    [Show full text]