Global Report on Validated Alternatives to the Use of Methyl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Report on Validated Alternatives to the Use of Methyl Global Report on Validated Alternatives to the Use of Methyl Bromide for Soil Fumigation Cover photo Alternative to methyl bromide: Float System (description on pages 17 - 24) Global Report on Validated Alternatives to the Use of Methyl Bromide for Soil Fumigation Edited by R. Labrada and L. Fornasari The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization and the Environment Programme of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers, or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision of the stated policy of the Food and Agriculture Organization and the Environment This publication may be reproduced in whole, or in part and in any form for educational, or non-profit, purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided that acknowledgment of the source is made. FAO and UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale, or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from FAO, or UNEP. ã FAO and UNEP 2001 Contacts: Dr. Ricardo Labrada, Weed Officer Food and Agriculturen Organization of the United Nations - Plant Protection Service Via delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, ITALY Tel. +39-0657054079 Fax. +39-0657056347 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGP/AGPP/IPM/Weeds/Default.htm Website: http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGP/AGPP/IPM/Web_Brom/Default.htm Mr. Rajendra Shende, Chief Energy and OzonAction Unit Division of Technology, Industry and Economics United Nations Environment Programme Tour Mirabeau 39-43 quai André Citroen 75739 Paris Cedex 15, FRANCE Tel. +33 1 44 37 1450 Fax. +33 1 44 37 1474 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.uneptie.org/ozonaction.html This document is available on the FAO website at: http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGP/agpp/IPM/Web_Brom/Default/htm and on the UNEP OzonAction website at: http://www.uneptie.org/ozonaction.html 2 CONTENTS Page Contents iii PREFACE v List of Contributors vii List of Acronyms viii COUNTRY REPORTS Chapter I - LATIN AMERICA 1 Alternatives for the replacement of Methyl Bromide in Argentina L. A. Salles, D. A. Sosa & A. Valeiro 3 Effective alternatives to Methyl Bromide in Brazil 13 L. A. Salles Chapter II - NORTH AMERICA 25 Field validation of Methyl Bromide alternatives in Florida fresh market vegetable production systems D. O. Chellemi 27 Chapter III – EUROPE 31 Alternatives to Methyl Bromide for soil fumigation in Spain A. Bello, J.A. López-Pérez, L. Díaz-Viruliche and J. Tello 33 Available alternatives for Italy M. L. Gullino 47 Chapter IV – ASIA 61 Approaches for the reduction of the use of Methyl Bromide and alternatives in Japan A. Tateya 63 CHAPTER V – AFRICA 71 Validated alternatives used in Kenya and Morocco M. Ammati and B. Nyambo 73 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87 iii iv PREFACE Methyl bromide (MeBr) is a fumigant used to control arthropods, nematodes, pathogens and weed seeds in soil in several crops, such as tomatoes, peppers, eggplants, tobacco, strawberries, ornamentals and other crops. Some years ago it was discovered that this fumigant is a strong chemical depleting the Earth's ozone layer. Its ozone depletion potential is 0.4, i.e. higher than the admissible threshold of 0.2. In addition, it is also known that bromine released by MeBr is 40 times more aggressive than chlorine in breaking down ozone on a per atom basis. Governments and international agencies aware of the problem have agreed to establish a programme for phasing out the use of MeBr. Since the fumigant is used in several high-income crops the established phase out gives times to the countries for the development of new alternatives to replace MeBr. During the last five-seven years some projects and activities have been carried out in several countries which had a high consumption of MeBr as a soil fumigant. The work has been applied field research for the development of new alternatives and demonstrations of those highly effective ones in large plots. As a result of the above work there are available some published materials on new MeBr alternatives, which describe the feasibility and the disadvantage of each new pest control measure. Some of these publications have come out from several workshops and symposia organized in different countries by UNEP, UNIDO and other organizations. The main purpose of the present report is to provide information of successfully used alternatives in some countries or regions, where MeBr phase out is going on. Although the report often shows the lack of already validated alternatives, particularly for a region like Africa, the material provides enough elements of the technical and economical success of the use of several alternatives as well as those, which are nearly to be introduced into the agricultural practice. Agricultural researchers and extensionists could use this information for further studies and / or validation. This material, along with the Manual in preparation by FAO (sponsored by UNEP) (1), can also be a good reference for the training on new (1) R. Braga, R. Labrada, L. Fornasari and N. Fratini. Manual for Training of Extension Workers and Farmers on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide for Soil Fumigation. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper N. (...) In Prep. v alternatives in different countries, particularly for Training of Trainers (TOTs). In addition, FAO / UNEP do hope that such a report and training activities, wich are part of the Farmer Education and Training Programme being carried out by FAO and sponsored by UNEP under the Montreal Protocol’s Multilateral Fund, will also encourage the final validation of several promising alternatives to replace MeBr as soil fumigant. This will help developing countries to meet the MeBr phase-out requirements under the Montreal Protocol. FAO / UNEP would also like to acknowledge and appreciate the contributions kindly given by several specialists from various countries from all over the world, which made possible the preparation of this global report. This publication was prepared by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and sponsored by the United Nations Environment Programme – Division of Technology, Industry and Economics (UNEP-DTIE), as part of its OzonAction Programme under Montreal Protocol’s Multilateral Fund. Ricardo Labrada FAO, Rome (I) Luca Fornasari Montpellier (F) vi List of Contributors Dr. Mohamed Ammati Turin University Department of Plant Pathology Italy Institut Agronomique et Vétérinaire Hassan II Rabat Dr. Ricardo Labrada Morocco Plant Protection Service Plant Production and Protection Division Dr. Dan O. Chellemi Food and Agriculture Organization of the USDA, ARS U.S. Horticultural United Nations Research2001 South Rock Road, Fort Viale delle Terme di Caracalla Pierce, FL 34945 corresponding author: D.O. Rome 00100 Chellemi Italy Dr. Antonio Bello Dr. Brigitte Nyambo Department of. Agroecology Integrated Crop Management Practitioner Center for Environmental Sciences Village Market-Nairobi CSIC Kenya Madrid Spain Dr. Luiz A. Salles Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation Dr. J. A. López-Pérez Agricultural Research Center for Temperate Department of Agroecology Climate (EMBRAPA - CPACT) Center for Environmental Sciences Pelotas CSIC Brazil Madrid Spain Dr. A. Tateya Japanese Association for Fumigation Dr. L. Díaz-Viruliche Technology Department of Agroecology Tokyo Center for Environmental Sciences Japan CSIC Madrid Spain Dr. J. Tello Department of Plant Production ETSIA University of Almeria Spain Dr. M. L. Gullino DI.VA.P.R.A. vii List of Acronyms CPACT Agricultural Research Center for Temperate Climate of EMBRAPA EMBRAPA Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation) EPAGRI EU European Union DIVAPRA (Italy) ICM Integrated Crop Management FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations IGR Increased Growth Response INTA Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria (Argentina) IPM Integrated Pest Management KFC ...................spell out on page 75 !!! LPDE Low-Density Polyethylene Film MAPA Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (Spain) MAFF Ministry of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries - Japan MBOTC Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee MeBr Methyl Bromide MITC Methyl Isothiocyanate MITI Ministry of International Trade and Industry - Japan NPSSS Negative Pressure Soil Steam Sterilization SINDIFUMO TOT Training of Trainers UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization VIF Virtually Impermeable Film viii CHAPTER I: LATIN AMERICA 1 2 ALTERNATIVES FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF METHYL BROMIDE IN ARGENTINA L. A. Salles*, D. A. Sosa** and A. Valeiro** * EMBRAPA - CPACT, Brazil, ** INTA, Argentina Summary. Strawberry is an economically important crop in Argentina. Cropping of strawberry is variable in the regions of the country. Generally methyl bromide (MeBr) is applied as soil fumigant in the crops. Its use allows to protect the crop from the attack of several soil-borne pests. Several experiences have been carried out aiming at validating already tested alternatives and to adapt
Recommended publications
  • Eggplant Integrated Pest Management
    Eggplant Integrated Pest Management AN ECOLOGICAL GUIDE TRAINING RESOURCE TEXT ON CROP DEVELOPMENT, MAJOR AGRONOMIC PRACTICES, DISEASE AND INSECT ECOLOGY, INSECT PESTS, NATURAL ENEMIES AND DISEASES OF EGGPLANT FAO Inter-Country Programme for Integrated Pest Management In Vegetables in South and Southeast Asia June 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WHY THIS GUIDE? .................................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT: BEYOND BUGS….......................................................................... 2 1.2 THE VEGETABLE IPM PROGRAMME .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 DEVELOPING VEGETABLE IPM BASED ON RICE IPM ........................................................................... 3 1.4 EGGPLANT: A BIT OF HISTORY........................................................................................................... 3 2 EGGPLANT CROP DEVELOPMENT..................................................................................................... 4 2.1 EGGPLANT GROWTH STAGES............................................................................................................ 5 2.2 SUSCEPTIBILITY OF EGGPLANT GROWTH STAGES TO PESTS ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Conservation
    Soil conservation Erosion barriers on disturbed slope, Marin County, California Contour plowing in Pennsylvania in 1938. The rows formed slow surface water run-off during rainstorms to prevent soil erosion and allows the water time to infiltrate into the soil. Soil conservation is the prevention of loss of the top most layer of the soil from erosion or prevention of reduced fertility caused by over usage, acidification, salinization or other chemical soil contamination. Slash-and-burn and other unsustainable methods of subsistence farming are practiced in some lesser developed areas. A sequel to the deforestation is typically large scale erosion, loss of soil nutrients and sometimes total desertification. Techniques for improved soil conservation include crop rotation, cover crops, conservation tillage and planted windbreaks, affect both erosion and fertility. When plants die, they decay and become part of the soil. Code 330 defines standard methods recommended by the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Farmers have practiced soil conservation for millennia. In Europe, policies such as the Common Agricultural Policy are targeting the application of best management practices such as reduced tillage, winter cover crops,[1] plant residues and grass margins in order to better address the soil conservation. Political and economic action is further required to solve the erosion problem. A simple governance hurdle concerns how we value the land and this can be changed by cultural adaptation.[2] Contour ploughing Contour ploughing orients furrows following the contour lines of the farmed area. Furrows move left and right to maintain a constant altitude, which reduces runoff. Contour ploughing was practiced by the ancient Phoenicians, and is effective for slopes between two and ten percent.[3] Contour ploughing can increase crop yields from 10 to 50 percent, partially as a result of greater soil retention.[4] Terrace farming Terracing is the practice of creating nearly level areas in a hillside area.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomato Integrated Pest Management : an Ecological Guide
    Why this guide? About this guide This ecological guide is developed by the FAO Inter-Country Programme for IPM in vegetables in South and Southeast Asia. It is an updated version of the Tomato IPM Ecological Guide dated June 1996. The objective of this ecological guide is to provide general technical background information on tomato production, supplemented with field experiences from the National IPM programmes connected to FAOs Vegetable ICP, and from related organizations active in farmer participatory IPM. Reference is made to exercise protocols developed by Dr. J. Vos of CABI Bioscience (formerly IIBC/CAB International) for FAO. The exercises are described in Vegetable IPM Exercise book, 1998 which contains examples of practical training exercises that complement the technical background information from this guide. Who will use this guide? National IPM programmes, IPM trainers, and others interested in IPM training and farmer participatory research. How to use this guide The ecological guides are technical reference manuals. They give background information and refer to exercises/studies that can be done in the field during training of trainers (TOT), farmers field schools (FFS) and action research to better understand a topic. The information in the guides is not specific for one country. Rather, this guide is an inspirational guide that provides a wealth of technical information and gives ideas of IPM practices from several countries, mainly from the Asian Region, to inspire IPM people world-wide to conduct discovery-based IPM training and to set up experiments to see if such practices would work in their countries and continents of assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Progress on Continuous Cropping Obstacle and Green Control of Strawberry
    E3S Web of Conferences 251, 02044 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125102044 TEES 2021 Research Progress on Continuous Cropping Obstacle and Green Control of Strawberry Zhengwei Xiea, Qianqian Mab*, Wanyun Pengc, Zhide Wangd, Peng Wue, Yexing Sunf Dazhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dazhou, Sichuan, China Abstract. Continuous cropping obstacle is a big problem of Strawberry planting. Continuous cropping obstacle leads to the accumulation of phenolic acids, imbalance of soil microorganism, deterioration of physical and chemical properties, resulting in sharp decline in Strawberry yield and quality. At present, the prevention and cure of continuous cropping obstacle of Strawberry is an urgent problem to be solved. The pathogen does not produce drug resistance, is safe to fresh fruit and does not pollute the environment. 1 Introduction The continuous cropping disease of strawberry was the main factor restricting strawberry production at Strawberry is one of the most widely cultivated fruit present, and the disease was prevalent in strawberry trees in the world. It is known as "the Queen of Berries". producing areas all over the world, the occurrence of the In 2018, the world strawberry planting area is 372,400 disease, the light leading to yield reduction and yield hm2, the annual yield is 8337,100 tons. In 2017, the reduction, heavy or no harvest, serious constraints on the world imported 947,500 tons of strawberries and sustainable development of strawberry. In the past, exported 951,400 tons. China is the largest strawberry chemical bactericides were widely used to disinfect the producing country in the world, and its annual output has soil, but the chemical disinfecting of the soil would been the first in the world since 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Botany and Use of Plants
    SECTION 1: CLASSIFICATION OF BOTANY AND USE OF PLANTS 1. Introduction Botany refers to the scientific study of the plant kingdom. As a branch of biology, it mainly accounts for the science of plants or ‘phytobiology’. The main objective of the this section is for participants, having completed their training, to be able to: 1. Identify and classify various types of herbs 2. Choose the appropriate categories and types of herbs for breeding and planting 1 2. Botany 2.1 Branches – Objectives – Usability Botany covers a wide range of scientific sub-disciplines that study the growth, reproduction, metabolism, morphogenesis, diseases, and evolution of plants. Subsequently, many subordinate fields are to appear, such as: Systematic Botany: its main purpose the classification of plants Plant morphology or phytomorphology, which can be further divided into the distinctive branches of Plant cytology, Plant histology, and Plant and Crop organography Botanical physiology, which examines the functions of the various organs of plants A more modern but equally significant field is Phytogeography, which associates with many complex objects of research and study. Similarly, other branches of applied botany have made their appearance, some of which are Phytopathology, Phytopharmacognosy, Forest Botany, and Agronomy Botany, among others. 2 Like all other life forms in biology, plant life can be studied at different levels, from the molecular, to the genetic and biochemical, through to the study of cellular organelles, cells, tissues, organs, individual plants, populations and communities of plants. At each of these levels a botanist can deal with the classification (taxonomy), structure (anatomy), or function (physiology) of plant life.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungi P1: OTA/XYZ P2: ABC JWST082-FM JWST082-Kavanagh July 11, 2011 19:19 Printer Name: Yet to Come
    P1: OTA/XYZ P2: ABC JWST082-FM JWST082-Kavanagh July 11, 2011 19:19 Printer Name: Yet to Come Fungi P1: OTA/XYZ P2: ABC JWST082-FM JWST082-Kavanagh July 11, 2011 19:19 Printer Name: Yet to Come Fungi Biology and Applications Second Edition Editor Kevin Kavanagh Department of Biology National University of Ireland Maynooth Maynooth County Kildare Ireland A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication P1: OTA/XYZ P2: ABC JWST082-FM JWST082-Kavanagh July 11, 2011 19:19 Printer Name: Yet to Come This edition first published 2011 © 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Wiley-Blackwell is an imprint of John Wiley & Sons, formed by the merger of Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical and Medical business with Blackwell Publishing. Registered Office: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial Offices: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/ wiley-blackwell. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of International Conference on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVES TO METHYL BROMIDE LISBON, PORTUGAL, 27-30 SEPTEMBER 2004 1 Title: Proceedings of International Conference on Alternatives to Methyl Bromide Editors: Tom Batchelor and Flávia Alfarroba ISBN: Printed: European Commission, Brussels, Belgium 2 PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVES TO METHYL BROMIDE Editors Tom Batchelor and Flávia Alfarroba 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The organisers are very grateful for the hard work and support from the following people, organisations and commercial enterprises: CONFERENCE ORGANISATION Steering Committee: Mr João Gonçalves (Ministry of Environment); Mme Flávia Alfarroba (Ministry of Agriculture); Mr Ricardo Gomes (Ministry of Agriculture); Prof Manuel Belo Moreira (Technical University of Lisbon); Antonieta Castro (Ministry of Environment); Dr Tom Batchelor (European Commission) Scientific Committee: Dr Tom Batchelor (European Commission); Prof Silva Fernandes (Technical University of Lisbon); Dr Antonio Lavadinho (Ministry of Agriculture) Logistics: Prof Manuel Belo Moreira (Technical University of Lisbon); Mme Antonieta Castro (Ministry of Environment); Mr Luis Morbey (Ministry of Environment); Dr Vidal Abreu (Ministry of Agriculture); Mme Joaquina Fonseca (Ministry of Agriculture) Alternatives Fair: Mr Ricardo Gomes, Mr Joao Sousa Alves, Mr Jorge Moreira (Ministry of Agriculture); Dr Melanie Miller (Consultant); Prof Manuel Belo Moreira (Technical University of Lisbon) MAJOR SPONSORS Instituto do Ambiente (IA, Ministry of Environment), Direcção-Geral de Protecção das Culturas (DGPC, Ministry of Agriculture), Associação para o Desenvolvimento do Instituto Superior de Agronomia (ADISA, Technical University of Lisbon / Faculty of Agronomy), and the European Commission. We are grateful to Dow AgroSciences for a financial contribution towards the cost of travel that allowed some technical experts to attend this conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Five Chromium-Removing Bacteria Isolated from Chromium-Contaminated Soil
    Water Air Soil Pollut (2014) 225:1904 DOI 10.1007/s11270-014-1904-2 Characterization of Five Chromium-Removing Bacteria Isolated from Chromium-Contaminated Soil Zhiguo He & Shuzhen Li & Lisha Wang & Hui Zhong Received: 21 January 2013 /Accepted: 10 February 2014 /Published online: 21 February 2014 # Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Abstract The potential for bioremediation of chromi- Keywords Chromium-removing bacteria . um pollution using bacteria was investigated in this Pseudochrobactrum saccharolyticum . Aerobic process . study. Five chromium-removing bacteria strains were Biotransformations . Bioremediation . Waste treatment successfully isolated from Cr(VI)contaminated soils and identified by their 16S rRNA gene sequences. The optimum growth temperature (30–40 °C) and pH (8.5– 1 Introduction 11) for the five isolates were investigated. The effect of initial Cr(VI) concentrations (0–1,575 mg L−1)onbac- Among heavy-metal pollutants, chromium (Cr) is con- terial growth was also studied. Results showed that sidered to be toxic and one of the main pollutants Pseudochrobactrum saccharolyticum strain W1 had (Yewalkar et al. 2007). Chromium is widely used in high chromium-removing ability and could grow at − industrial operations such as leather tanning, pigment Cr(VI) concentrations from 0 to 1,225 mg L 1.Toour production, electroplating, paints, steel manufacture, knowledge, this is the first report of chromium removal and automobile production (Wang and Xiao 1995; by a member of the Pseudochrobactrum genus. Pattanapipitpaisal et al. 2001). Intensive industrial ap- Sporosarcina saromensis W5 had the highest − − plications of chromium and releases of associated waste chromium-removing rate of 0.79 mg h 1 mg 1 biomass.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides and Their Applications in Agriculture
    Asian Journal of Applied Science and Technology (AJAST) (Open Access Quarterly International Journal) Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 894-900, April-June 2018 Pesticides and Their Applications in Agriculture Dr. Ishan Y. Pandya* *Ecologist, GEER Foundation, Gandhinagar, Gujarat-India (382007). *Professor and Head, DAPL institute, Jamnagar, Gujarat-India (361006). Email: [email protected] Article Received: 01 March 2018 Article Accepted: 09 April 2018 Article Published: 08 May 2018 ABSTRACT A pest is any organism that causes an economic loss or damage to the physical well-being of human beings. It may destroy crops, cause diseases in them or in human beings. Chemicals used to eradicate or worn-out the unwanted pest’s population from agriculture or experimental field are called as pesticides. Some pesticides are organism-specific and have particular mode of action to remove the pests. Current article is informative about the types of pesticides used in modern agriculture and bio-farming, and its interaction in environmental processes. Keywords: Fungicides, weedicides/herbicides, nematicides, rodenticides, insecticides, algicides, biopesticides and BCA. 1. INTRODUCTION Since before 2000 BC, humans have utilized pesticides to protect their crops. The first known pesticide was elemental sulfur dusting used in ancient Sumer about 4,500 years ago in ancient Mesopotamia. The Rig Veda, which is about 4,000 years old, mentions the use of poisonous plants for pest control. Modern agriculture employs a number of chemicals for enhancing crop yield and protecting the same. Synthetic fertilizers are added to replenish the various nutrients and maintain the soil fertility. These chemical fertilizers are added to the soils in order to overcome the deficiency of minerals and to provide extra chemicals required for proper growth of high yielding varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticides and Their Uses in Minnesota-1966
    Extension Bulletin 263-Revised Insecticides and their uses in Minnesota-1966 FOLLOW THE LABEL J. A. Lofgren and L. K. Cutkomp Agricultural Extension Service • University of Minnesota I nsecticides continue to be an essential part of insect 8. Cover food and water containers when treating control programs. Effective, safe, and economic insect around livestock or pet areas. Do not contami­ control depends upon proper identification of the pest, nate fish ponds. a knowledge of its habits and biology, and an intelli­ 9. Use separate equipment for applying hormone­ gent selection of the best combination of practices and type herbicides in order to avoid accidental in ­ chemicals available. jury to susceptible plants. It is extremely important to store and use all pesti­ 10. Always dispose of empty containers so that they cides properly to avoid injury to: create no hazard to humans, animals, or valu­ 1. The person applying the chemicals ; able plants. 2. Children and others who may come into contact 11. Observe label directions and cautions to keep with improperly stored chemicals or application residues on edible portions of plants within the equipment; limits permitted by law. 3. Treated crops or animals through overtreat­ 12. If symptoms of illness occur during or shortly ment, through selection of the wrong formula­ after spraying or dusting, call a physician or get tion, or because of illegal chemical residues; the patient to a hospital immediately. 4. Adjacent crops and livestock because of drift; 5. Fish, wildlife, and other nontarget organisms in Provide for Safe Disposal of Empty Containers the treated area. For all empty containers of all types: Do not re­ General Precautions for Using Pesticides use the container.
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Metals and Basic Dyes Sequestration by Utilizing Emerging Cellulosic Low Cost Agricultural Waste As a Potential Bio-Adsorbent
    [VOLUME 6 I ISSUE 1 I JAN. – MARCH 2019] e ISSN 2348 –1269, Print ISSN 2349-5138 http://ijrar.com/ Cosmos Impact Factor 4.236 Heavy metals and basic dyes sequestration by utilizing emerging cellulosic low cost agricultural waste as a potential bio-adsorbent. Aakriti Verma1a & Kushagra Rejendra1b* & Kalpana Singh2 1a,b Amity School of Earth and Environmental Science, Amity University, Haryana. 2Greater Noida Institute of Technology, Uttar Pradesh Received: January 10, 2019 Accepted: February 10, 2019 ABSTRACT: The problem of water pollution is alarming due to various anthropogenic activities. Heavy metals are being released in the water bodies causing heavy metal pollution and also accumulate in the food chain and ultimately affecting human health. Various activities like manufacturing of fertilizers, industrialization, mining, electroplating, smelters etc are responsible for the release of heavy metals in the water bodies. Various heavy metals include Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, Ni, Cr, and metalloids like arsenic in drinking water causes harmful effects on human health like allergies, hyper pigmentation, skin cancer, neurological disorders, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, etc. Therefore, there is a need to develop and focus on methods to remove heavy metals from the waste water using techniques which are environment friendly, cost-effective and easily available in nature. Bioadsorbents have come up as one of the promising substitutes for heavy metal removal because it is readily available in nature and most importantly the waste residues from
    [Show full text]
  • 1455189355674.Pdf
    THE STORYTeller’S THESAURUS FANTASY, HISTORY, AND HORROR JAMES M. WARD AND ANNE K. BROWN Cover by: Peter Bradley LEGAL PAGE: Every effort has been made not to make use of proprietary or copyrighted materi- al. Any mention of actual commercial products in this book does not constitute an endorsement. www.trolllord.com www.chenaultandgraypublishing.com Email:[email protected] Printed in U.S.A © 2013 Chenault & Gray Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Storyteller’s Thesaurus Trademark of Cheanult & Gray Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Chenault & Gray Publishing, Troll Lord Games logos are Trademark of Chenault & Gray Publishing. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS THE STORYTeller’S THESAURUS 1 FANTASY, HISTORY, AND HORROR 1 JAMES M. WARD AND ANNE K. BROWN 1 INTRODUCTION 8 WHAT MAKES THIS BOOK DIFFERENT 8 THE STORYTeller’s RESPONSIBILITY: RESEARCH 9 WHAT THIS BOOK DOES NOT CONTAIN 9 A WHISPER OF ENCOURAGEMENT 10 CHAPTER 1: CHARACTER BUILDING 11 GENDER 11 AGE 11 PHYSICAL AttRIBUTES 11 SIZE AND BODY TYPE 11 FACIAL FEATURES 12 HAIR 13 SPECIES 13 PERSONALITY 14 PHOBIAS 15 OCCUPATIONS 17 ADVENTURERS 17 CIVILIANS 18 ORGANIZATIONS 21 CHAPTER 2: CLOTHING 22 STYLES OF DRESS 22 CLOTHING PIECES 22 CLOTHING CONSTRUCTION 24 CHAPTER 3: ARCHITECTURE AND PROPERTY 25 ARCHITECTURAL STYLES AND ELEMENTS 25 BUILDING MATERIALS 26 PROPERTY TYPES 26 SPECIALTY ANATOMY 29 CHAPTER 4: FURNISHINGS 30 CHAPTER 5: EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 31 ADVENTurer’S GEAR 31 GENERAL EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS 31 2 THE STORYTeller’s Thesaurus KITCHEN EQUIPMENT 35 LINENS 36 MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS
    [Show full text]