DOCSLIB.ORG

The Long Term Stabilization of Uranium Mill Tailings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Long Term Stabilization of Uranium Mill Tailings IAEA-TECDOC-1403 The long term stabilization of uranium mill tailings Final report of a co-ordinated research project 2000–2004 August 2004 IAEA-TECDOC-1403 The long term stabilization of uranium mill tailings Final report of a co-ordinated research project 2000–2004 August 2004 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Waste Technology Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria THE LONG TERM STABILIZATION OF URANIUM MILL TAILINGS IAEA, VIENNA, 2004 IAEA-TECDOC-1403. ISBN 92–0–108904–X ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2004 Printed by the IAEA in Austria August 2004 FOREWORD The IAEA attaches great importance to the dissemination of information that can assist Member States with the development, implementation, maintenance and continuous improvement of systems, programmes and activities that support the nuclear fuel cycle and nuclear applications. This includes managing the legacy of accidents and past practices, including that from uranium mining and milling. A comprehensive IAEA programme of work covers multiple aspects of environmental remediation: technical and non-technical factors, including costs, that influence environmental remediation strategies and pertinent decision making; site characterization techniques and strategies; assessment of remediation technologies; techniques and strategies for post-remediation compliance monitoring; special issues such as the remediation of sites with dispersed radioactive contaminations or mixed contamination by hazardous and radioactive substance and of uranium mining and milling sites. In the past, often little or no care was taken to isolate uranium mill tailings from the environment. In order to address the specific problems surrounding the disposal of uranium mill tailings, the IAEA developed a co-ordinated research project (CRP) in this area. CRPs are intended to bring together researchers from different Member States with the view to share and disseminate the experience in solving problems of common interest. The aim of the CRP on the long term stabilization of uranium mill tailings was to contribute to the development of conceptual, technical, and management solutions that: render tailings more inert over prolonged time-spans; render impounded materials and engineered structures stable; over prolonged time spans; minimize the need for active maintenance; can be applied in a remediation context; and support solutions that are technically and economically feasible. The IAEA wishes to express its thanks to all Chief Scientific Investigators and other contributors to the work. Special thanks are due S. Needham, Australia, who under contract provided a seed review of tailings disposal techniques, and to H. Cotzee and R. Gatzweiler, who reviewed an early draft. The IAEA officer responsible for this technical publication was W.E. Falck of the Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Management. EDITORIAL NOTE This publication has been prepared from the original material as submitted by the authors. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the IAEA, the governments of the nominating Member States or the nominating organizations. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. The authors are responsible for having obtained the necessary permission for the IAEA to reproduce, translate or use material from sources already protected by copyrights. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Background......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Objectives ........................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1. Overall objective..................................................................................... 2 1.2.2. Scientific research objectives.................................................................. 3 1.3. The focus of the CRP.......................................................................................... 4 1.4. The structure of the CRP .................................................................................... 5 2. HISTORICAL PRACTICES ............................................................................................ 6 2.1. The ‘ages’ of uranium production ...................................................................... 6 2.2. Age, number, geographic and climatic distribution of uranium mill tailings piles........................................................................................................ 8 2.3. Relationship of tailings piles to mine and mill facilities .................................. 11 2.4. Historical approaches to tailings placements.................................................... 12 2.4.1. No effective containment...................................................................... 12 2.4.2. Low embankments................................................................................ 13 2.4.3. Topographic depressions ...................................................................... 13 2.4.4. Valley fill .............................................................................................. 13 2.4.5. Ring dyke or turkey nest dam............................................................... 13 2.4.6. Mined out pit......................................................................................... 13 2.4.7. Underground mine back-fill.................................................................. 14 2.4.8. Deep lake or river ................................................................................. 14 2.5. Classification of uranium mill tailings ............................................................. 14 2.6. Inappropriate uses of uranium mill tailings...................................................... 15 3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................................................................... 16 3.1. Events that have led to environmental impacts ................................................ 16 3.2. Impacts on human health.................................................................................. 19 3.3. Potential radiological impacts upon the natural environment .......................... 21 3.4. Toxic and hazardous compounds in tailings and their potential impacts ......... 23 4. REMEDIATION PROGRAMMES TO REDUCE HAZARDS FROM HISTORICAL URANIUM MILL TAILINGS .............................................................. 24 4.1. Driving forces for remedial work ..................................................................... 24 4.2. Remedial work undertaken............................................................................... 25 4.3. Examples from the USA................................................................................... 26 4.4. Examples from France...................................................................................... 26 4.5. Examples from Germany.................................................................................. 26 4.6. Examples form the Czech Republic ................................................................. 26 4.7. Examples from Australia.................................................................................. 27 4.8. Evaluation of the remedial works at historic tailings piles............................... 27 5. PRESENT DAY PRACTICES....................................................................................... 28 5.1. Objectives ......................................................................................................... 28 5.2. Standards for radiological and environmental protection................................. 29 5.3. Member States’ regulations, standards and guidelines..................................... 30 5.4. Current approaches to tailings containment ..................................................... 32 5.4.1. Less-favoured options........................................................................... 32 5.4.2. Above ground disposal ......................................................................... 33 5.4.3. Below ground containment................................................................... 36 5.4.4. Deep lake .............................................................................................. 39 5.4.5. Purpose-built containment .................................................................... 39 5.5. Current approaches to stabilise and isolate uranium mill tailings .................... 40 5.5.1. Design objectives.................................................................................. 40 5.5.2. Containment preparation....................................................................... 40 5.5.3. Tailings preparation .............................................................................. 41 5.5.4. Tailings discharge and deposition......................................................... 43 5.5.5. Tailings consolidation..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State of Utah DIVISION of WASTE MANAGEMENT GARY R
    Department of Environmental Quality L. Scott Baird Executive Director State of Utah DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT GARY R. HERBERT AND RADIATION CONTROL Governor Ty L. Howard SPENCER J. COX Director Lieutenant Governor November 5, 2020 Cassady Kristensen Environmental Business Partner Rio Tinto Kennecott 4700 Daybreak Parkway South Jordan, UT 84009 RE: Kennecott Utah Copper Tailings Impoundment Refuse Class IIIb Landfill Permit Dear Ms. Kristensen: The Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (Division) has completed its review of the application to permit the Rio Tinto Kennecott Utah Copper Tailings Impoundment Refuse Class IIIb Landfill located on the Rio Tinto Kennecott Tailings Impoundment facility in Salt Lake County, Utah. Enclosed with this letter is the approved Permit Number 1905 and applicable attachments from portions of the application. The Permit approval and expiration dates are shown on the permit cover page. Also, the Statement of Basis for this permit (DSHW-2020-014707) is included with the permit. If you have any questions, please call Doug Taylor at (801) 536-0240. Sincerely, Ty L. Howard, Director Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control (Over) DSHW-2020-014711 195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144880 • Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4880 Telephone (801) 536-0200 • Fax (801) 536-0222 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4284 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper TLH/DT/ar Enclosures: Permit (DSHW-2020-004084) Attachment #1 - Landfill Design (DSHW-2020-004510) Attachment #2 – Operation Plan (DSHW- 2020-004512) Attachment #3 – Closure and Post-Closure Plan (DSHW-2020-004514) Statement of Basis (DSHW-2020-014707) c: Gary Edwards, MS, Health Officer, Salt Lake County Health Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Possible Reuse of Extractive Waste Coming from Abandoned Mine Sites: Case Study in Gorno, Italy
    sustainability Article Assessment of the Possible Reuse of Extractive Waste Coming from Abandoned Mine Sites: Case Study in Gorno, Italy Neha Mehta 1,2, Giovanna Antonella Dino 1,*, Iride Passarella 3, Franco Ajmone-Marsan 4, Piergiorgio Rossetti 1 and Domenico Antonio De Luca 1 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Turin, 10125 Torino, Italy; [email protected] (N.M.); [email protected] (P.R.); [email protected] (D.A.D.L.) 2 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5AH, UK 3 Horizon s.r.l., 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-011-6705150 Received: 21 January 2020; Accepted: 17 March 2020; Published: 21 March 2020 Abstract: Supply of resources, a growing population, and environmental pollution are some of the main challenges facing the contemporary world. The rapid development of mining activities has produced huge amounts of waste. This waste, found in abandoned mine sites, provides the potential opportunity of extracting raw material. The current study, therefore, focuses on testing the validation of a shared methodology to recover extractive waste from abandoned mines, and applies this methodology to a case study in Gorno, northwest Italy. The methods focused on: (1) analyzing the impact of tailings and fine fraction of waste rock (<2 mm) on plants (Cress - Lepidium Sativum) to assess usability of both as soil additive, and (2) recovering raw materials from tailings and coarse fraction (>2 mm) of waste rock, by means of dressing methods like wet shaking table and froth flotation.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impacts of Uranium Mining in Australia History, Progress and Current Practice
    A policy paper commissioned MAY 2017 by the Minerals Council of Australia Environmental impacts of uranium mining in Australia History, progress and current practice Ben Heard POLICY PAPER Environmental impacts of uranium mining in Australia History, progress and current practice Ben Heard is a doctoral researcher at the University of Adelaide, focusing on clean energy systems and the potential role of nuclear technologies. He holds a Masters in Corporate Environmental and Sustainability Management from Monash University and was an environmental sustainability consultant from 2005-2016. He has taught several units of the Masters of Sustainability at the University of Adelaide and is an honourary member of the Leaders Institute of South Australia. His most recent research paper Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems was published in the journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. The Minerals Council of Australia is the peak national body representing Australia’s exploration, mining and minerals processing industry, nationally and internationally, in its contribution to sustainable economic, and social development. This publication is part of the overall program of the MCA, as endorsed by its Board of Directors, but does not necessarily reflect the views of individual members of the Board. Minerals Council of Australia Level 3, 44 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603 (PO Box 4497, Kingston ACT Australia 2604) P. + 61 2 6233 0600 | F. + 61 2 6233 0699 www.minerals.org.au | [email protected] Copyright © 2017 Minerals Council of Australia. All rights reserved. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher and copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Drilling Intersects Uranium Mineralisation Beneath the Historical Nabarlek Open Pit and at U40 Opening up New Discovery Opportunities
    9 September 2019 Exploration Update –West Arnhem-Nabarlek Project, Northern Territory Drilling intersects uranium mineralisation beneath the historical Nabarlek Open Pit and at U40 opening up new discovery opportunities Highlights • Diamond drilling beneath the historical high-grade Nabarlek Uranium Mine intersects anomalous uranium-gold bearing fault breccia beneath the Oenpelli Dolerite with a best intercept of 0.3m @ 525ppm U3O8. • Mineralisation at the base of the breccia bears a strong similarity to that seen within the historical Nabarlek ore zone, suggesting the potential for a Nabarlek- style deposit in the vicinity. • This anomalous breccia is poorly tested beneath the dolerite and open to the south. Several beds of south-east dipping graphitic sediments intersected in the vicinity provide a target for follow-up drilling. • Diamond drilling at U40 intersects open-ended uranium mineralisation on the western flank of the IP anomaly with a best intercept of 0.7m @ 1,059 ppm U3O8. • Next steps include a review of historical EM data to refine targets for possible further drilling. DevEx Resources Limited (ASX: DEV; “the Company”) is pleased to advise that assay results have been received from recent diamond drilling at the Company’s 100%-owned West Arnhem- Nabarlek Project in the Northern Territory, confirming the presence of anomalous uranium mineralisation beneath the historical Nabarlek Mine and on the western side of the U40 Prospect. In addition, the drilling has provided invaluable structural and geological information which
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples
    SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors PREFACE Population growth, rapid urbanisation, more water intense consumption patterns and climate change are intensifying the pressure on freshwater resources. The increasing scarcity of water, combined with other factors such as energy and fertilizers, is driving millions of farmers and other entrepreneurs to make use of wastewater. Wastewater reuse is an excellent example that naturally explains the importance of integrated management of water, soil and waste, which we define as the Nexus While the information in this book are generally believed to be true and accurate at the approach. The process begins in the waste sector, but the selection of date of publication, the editors and the publisher cannot accept any legal responsibility for the correct management model can make it relevant and important to any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, expressed or the water and soil as well. Over 20 million hectares of land are currently implied, with respect to the material contained herein. known to be irrigated with wastewater. This is interesting, but the The opinions expressed in this book are those of the Case Authors. Their inclusion in this alarming fact is that a greater percentage of this practice is not based book does not imply endorsement by the United Nations University. on any scientific criterion that ensures the “safe use” of wastewater. In order to address the technical, institutional, and policy challenges of safe water reuse, developing countries and countries in transition need clear institutional arrangements and more skilled human resources, United Nations University Institute for Integrated with a sound understanding of the opportunities and potential risks of Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources wastewater use.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Bibliography on the Geology of Canadian Deposits and Occurrences of Uranium and Thorium
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA COMMISSION GEOLOGIQUE DU CANADA PAPER 75-45 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE GEOLOGY OF CANADIAN DEPOSITS AND OCCURRENCES OF URANIUM AND THORIUM DENYSE M. GARNEAU Energy, Mines and Energie, Mines et Resources Canada Ressources Canada 1976 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PAPEP 75-45 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE GEOLOGY OF CANADIAN DEPOSITS AND OCCURRENCES OF URANIUM AND THORIUM DENYSE M. GARNEAU 1976 © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1976 Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9, from the Geological Survey of Canada 601 Booth St., Ottawa, K1A 0E8 or through your bookseller. r, i . »T .... „,- ... Price: Canada: $2.00 Catalogue No. M44-75-45 Othe_„ r countries:$2. !„ . 4.0„ Price subject to change without notice FOREWORD The only previous bibliography on the occurrence of uranium in Canada was compiled by J. W. Griffith and published by the Geological Survey of Canada nearly 20 years ago, in 1956. Shortly afterward interest in prospecting for uranium faded, to be revived for a brief period 19G6 to 1970, when much literature on Canadian deposits and occurrencesjias published. It appears likely that uranium will play a significant role in meeting Canada's energy needs in the future. To assist those con- cerned with uranium exploration a revision of the previous bibliography has been prepared. Miss Garneau was assigned the task of compilation of the new bibliography, which was based upon a file index built up since 1967 by Eric Smith, T. J. Bottrill, Andre Boyer, and H.W. Little. Miss Garneau has checked these references and added many herself.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS URANIUM CONTAMINATION VALUES and LIMITS Submitted By
    THESIS URANIUM CONTAMINATION VALUES AND LIMITS Submitted by Aaron Paul Miaullis Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2012 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Thomas Johnson Co-Advisor: Alexander Brandl Thomas Borch Copyright by Aaron Paul Miaullis, 2012 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT URANIUM CONTAMINATION VALUES AND LIMITS Hypothesis: Current soil contamination limits for non-enriched uranium are not consistent and are not optimized to allow the beneficial use of uranium while protecting the health of the public. Objective: Assess available health impact data regarding non-enriched uranium ingestion and inhalation as well as past soil contamination recommendations to determine if the regulatory limits for uranium are optimized, as recommended by the ICRP. Provide supporting data for keeping current soil contamination limits for non-enriched uranium, or suggest new limits based upon chemical uptake ratios. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the following persons for their help, guidance, mentoring, and support during the research and compilation of this paper: The Lord God My family: Maureen, Nicholas, Caitlin and Helena Miaullis My parents: J. Bart Miaullis and Laura White The United States Army Dr. Tom Johnson Dr. Alexander Brandl An additional thank you to the following people for providing their time and effort in obtaining and providing much needed reference material: LTC Andrew Scott, PhD, US Army MAJ(R) Carlos Corredor Steve Brown The Armour Archive Finally, thanks to the significant number of other individuals with whom I have conversed and discussed many additional points within this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Progress in Building Confidence and Partnerships with Northern
    WM2011 Conference, February 27 – March 3, 2011, Phoenix, AZ Early Progress in Building Confidence and Partnerships with Northern First Nations and Communities in Low-Level Radioactive Waste Remediation Projects in Canada - 11321 Liliana Benitez*, Julie L. Brown*, Dave McCauley*, Robert L. Zelmer **, * Natural Resources Canada, **Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Office. ABSTRACT In 1982, the Government of Canada established the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Office (LLRWMO) as Canada’s agent for the management of historic low-level radioactive waste. Occurrences of historic waste have been discovered across Canada. The LLRWMO has conducted remediation activities in Port Hope, ON, Toronto (Scarborough), ON, Vancouver (Surrey), BC, Fort McMurray, AB, Tulita, NT, and various other locations across the country. At this time, a key area of focus for the LLRWMO is putting in place a strategy to address sites in Canada’s north that were contaminated, long ago, by the spillage of radioactive ores in transport. The contamination is located along what is known as the Northern Transportation Route, a 2200 km long route of lakes, rivers and portage points beginning at the former Port Radium site on Great Bear Lake, NT and extending to Fort McMurray, AB. To carry out its work in the north, the LLRWMO is adapting methods of community engagement and technical approaches that have led to successful remediation projects in Canada’s southern regions. Adjustments are being made to meet the realities of the north. Those realities include the challenges of Canada’s northern geography and environment and the need for understanding the ways of northern peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 Sewage Sludge Incineration
    2.2 Sewage Sludge Incineration There are approximately 170 sewage sludge incineration (SSI) plants in operation in the United States. Three main types of incinerators are used: multiple hearth, fluidized bed, and electric infrared. Some sludge is co-fired with municipal solid waste in combustors based on refuse combustion technology (see Section 2.1). Refuse co-fired with sludge in combustors based on sludge incinerating technology is limited to multiple hearth incinerators only. Over 80 percent of the identified operating sludge incinerators are of the multiple hearth design. About 15 percent are fluidized bed combustors and 3 percent are electric. The remaining combustors co-fire refuse with sludge. Most sludge incinerators are located in the Eastern United States, though there are a significant number on the West Coast. New York has the largest number of facilities with 33. Pennsylvania and Michigan have the next-largest numbers of facilities with 21 and 19 sites, respectively. Sewage sludge incinerator emissions are currently regulated under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart O and 40 CFR Part 61, Subparts C and E. Subpart O in Part 60 establishes a New Source Performance Standard for particulate matter. Subparts C and E of Part 61--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)--establish emission limits for beryllium and mercury, respectively. In 1989, technical standards for the use and disposal of sewage sludge were proposed as 40 CFR Part 503, under authority of Section 405 of the Clean Water Act. Subpart G of this proposed Part 503 proposes to establish national emission limits for arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and total hydrocarbons from sewage sludge incinerators.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power
    FEBRUARY 28, 2013 | No. 757 NUCLEAR POWER: LOOKING BACK, LOOKING FORWARD (NM757.4292) Last year marked the 20th anniversary of the fi rst edition of the World Nuclear Industry Status Report (WNISR). For two decades the reports have punctu- red the lies of the nuclear industry. Mycle Schneider and Antony Froggatt wrote the 2012 edition and both contributed to the 1992 edition − congratulations Mycle and NUCLEAR POWER: LOOKING Antony! BACK, LOOKING FORWARD 1 FUKUSHIMA PROPAGANDA 4 The predictions made in WNISR-1992 stack up well. After a 20-year period of signi- fi cant growth, the report correctly predicted that nuclear expansion would "slow to a URANIUM MINING ISSUES: trickle". From 1992 to 2012, worldwide nuclear power capacity increased from 326 2012 REVIEW 8 gigawatts (GW) to 374 GW − a 15% increase in 20 years. IN BRIEF 18 The nuclear industry is fi nally catching up with Mycle and Antony. The International Atomic Energy Agency's 'low' estimates have become a more reliable guide over the years, and the Agency's current 'low' estimate of 456 GW capacity in 2030 suggests very slow annual growth of around 1.5% (IAEA, 2012). Nuclear power's proportional contribution to world electricity production will certainly decline. Nuclear's contribution peaked at 17% in 1993, fell to 12.3% in 2011, and the IAEA estimates just 4.7−6.2% in 2030 (IAEA, 2012, p.17). By 2030, a majority of the world's reactors will be nearing the end of their operating lives and the nuclear industry will need to run just to stand still.
    [Show full text]
  • Counterguerrilla Operation
    FM 90-8 counterguerrilla operation/ AUGUST 1986 This publication contains technical or operational information that is for official government use only. Distribution is limited to US Government agencies Requests from outside the US Government for release of this publication under the Freedom of Information Act or the Foreign Military Sales Program must be made to: HO TR ADOC, Fort Monroe, VA 23651 ... HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION- Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. FM 90-8 CHAPTER 6. COMBAT SUPPORT Section I. General ............................................ 6-1 II. Reconnaissance and Surveillance Units ............. 6-2 Ill. Fire Support Units ................................. 6-7 CHAPTER 7. COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT Section I. General ............................................ 7-1 II. Bases ............................................. 7-1 Ill. Use of Assets ...................................... 7-3 APPENDIX A. SUBSURFACE OPERATIONS Section I. General ............................................ A-1 II. Tunneling .......................................... A-2 Ill. Destroying Underground Facilities ................. A-12 APPENDIX B. THE URBAN GUERRILLA Section I. General ............................................ B-1 II. Techniques to Counter the Urban Guerrilla .......... B-2 APPENDIX C. AMBUSH PATROLS Section I. General ............................................ C-1 II. Attack Fundamentals .............................. C-2 Ill. Planning ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides from the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives
    Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides From the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives Isolation of Uranium Mill Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides From the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives By Edward Landa GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 814 A critical review of the literature dealing with uranium mill tailings, with emphasis on the geologic and geochemical processes affecting the long-term containment of radionuclides 1980 United States Department of the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary Geological Survey H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 79-600148 Free on application to Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey 1200 South Eads Street, Arlington, VA 22202 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------­ 1 Acknowledginents ---------_----------------------------------------------- 2 Quantity and location of the tailings --------------------------------------­ 2 Radioactivity in tailings --------------------------------------------------­ 4 Sources of potential human radiation exposure from uranium mill tailings ------ 6 Radon emanation ----------------------------------------------------- 6 VVind transport ------------------------------------------------------- 6 Surface water transport and leaching ----------------------------------- 7 External gamma radiation -------------------------------------------­ 8 Contamination of terrestrial and aquatic vegetation ---------------------- 8 Seepage ----------------------------------------------------~--------
    [Show full text]