Magna Metro Township Planning Commission Thursday

Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 • Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Phone: (385) 468-6700 • Fax: (385) 468-6674

Magna Metro Township Planning Commission Public Meeting Agenda Thursday, June 11, 2020 6:30 P.M.

Location Join meeting in WebEx Meeting number (access code): 961 841 420 Join by phone Tap to call in from a mobile device (attendees only) +1-213-306-3065 United States Toll (Los Angeles) +1-602-666-0783 United States Toll (Phoenix) Access code: 961 841 420 Global call-in numbers Join from a video conferencing system or application Dial [email protected] You can also dial 173.243.2.68 and enter your meeting number. If you are the host, you can also enter your host PIN in your video conferencing system or application to start the meeting. Need help? Go to http://help.webex.com

UPON REQUEST, WITH 5 WORKING DAYS NOTICE, REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS MAY BE PROVIDED. PLEASE CONTACT WENDY GURR AT 385-468-6707. TTY USERS SHOULD CALL 711. The Planning Commission Public Meeting is a public forum where, depending on the agenda item, the Planning Commission may receive comment and recommendations from applicants, the public, applicable agencies and County staff regarding land use applications and other items on the Commission’s agenda. In addition, it is where the Planning Commission takes action on these items, which may include: approval, approval with conditions, denial, continuance, or recommendation to other bodies as applicable.

BUSINESS MEETING

1) Approval of the May 14, 2020 meeting minutes (motion/voting) 2) Other Business Items (as needed)

LAND USE APPLICATION(S) 31169- Dinah & Jack Nielsen are requesting Conditional Use approval for an Oversized Accessory Building (3,000 sq. ft. Garage) and approval to exceed the 25% rear yard coverage maximum. Acreage: approximately 0.71 acres. Location: 3330 South 8000 West. Zone: R-2-6.5. Planner: Diana Martinez

31146- Shaun Johnson is requesting Conditional Use approval for an Office/Warehouse use. Acreage: approximately 32.76 acres. Location: 7930 West 4100 South. Zone: M-1. Planner: Diana Martinez

June 11, 2020 Page 1 of 2 AGENDA – MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP

The Planning Commission, in its discretion, may request public input on this application prior to acting on the application. If public input is requested, public comment will be limited to three minutes per person.

PUBLIC HEARING(S) 31170- Spencer Pack is requesting a Rezone from the R-1-6 (Residential Zone) to the R-1-3 (Residential Zone). Acreage: 0.12 acres. Location: 3027 South 9150 West. Planner: Diana Martinez

31173- Scott Braithwaite is requesting a roadway improvements waiver (curb, gutter, and sidewalk). Acreage: approximately 3.85 acres. Location: 2330 South 7200 West. Zone: M-2. Planner: Diana Martinez

The Planning Commission will act on the proposed rezone after taking comments from the public during the public hearing. Public comments will be provided pursuant to the planning commission’s rules of conduct, which are attached to the back of this agenda. Public comments will be limited to three minutes per person.

ADJOURN

June 11, 2020 Page 2 of 2 AGENDA – MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP

Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 • Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Phone: (385) 468-6700 • Fax: (385) 468-6674

MEETING MINUTE SUMMARY MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Thursday, May 14, 2020 6:30 p.m.

Approximate meeting length: 1 hour 2 minutes *NOTE: Staff Reports referenced in this document can be Number of public in attendance: 7 found on the State website, or from Planning & Summary Prepared by: Wendy Gurr Development Services.

Meeting Conducted by: Commissioner Cripps

ATTENDANCE

Commissioners and Staff:

Public Business Commissioners Absent Mtg Mtg Public Business Clare Collard x x Planning Staff / DA Mtg Mtg Dan Cripps x x Ammon Lockwood x Wendy Gurr x x Aaron Weight x x Diana Martinez x x Mickey Sudbury x Travis Hair x x Mark Elieson x x Jim McNulty x x Todd Richards x x

BUSINESS MEETING

Meeting began at – 6:30 p.m. 1) Approval of Minutes from the April 9, 2020 meeting. Motion: To approve minutes from the April 9, 2020 meeting as presented. Motion by: Commissioner Collard 2nd by: Commissioner Elieson Vote: Commissioners voted unanimous in favor (of commissioners present) 2) Other Business Items (as needed) No other business items to discuss.

Commissioner Elieson motioned to close the business meeting and open the public hearing portion of the meeting, Commissioner Richards seconded that motion.

Magna Metro Township Planning Commission – May 14, 2020 – Meeting Summary Page 1 of 5

LAND USE APPLICATION(S) Hearings began at – 6:34 p.m.

31136- Scott Braithwaite is requesting approval of a Conditional Use for Warehouse/Office use. Acreage: 3.85 approx. acres. Location: 2330 South 7200 West. Zone: M-2 (Manufacturing). Planner: Diana Martinez

Greater Salt Lake Municipal Services District Planner Diana Martinez provided an analysis of the Staff Report.

Ms. Martinez said have had discussion with applicant the right to go before the pc for exception to the mayor with an exception and county engineer may not support but may support a delay agreement on sidewalk. Commissioner Cripps said can see a delay on the sidewalk and this is an entryway and may be getting that started. Commissioner Elieson said if putting curb and gutter, may as well put sidewalk in. Ms. Martinez said only discussed preliminary only, discussed delay agreement not waiver.

PUBLIC PORTION OF MEETING OPENED

Speaker # 1: Representative Architect Name: Casey Cooper Address: 909 West South Jordan Parkway Comments: Mr. Cooper read an email currently no storm water access at the street, if finishing curb and gutter whole frontage will discharge on to neighboring properties from the east and west. Doesn’t know if Mr. Braithwaite is on the call and can’t speak for him, but if delay agreement to curb, gutter, and sidewalk with storm water access availability, there are concerns. Other comment the road curb exists from south to north. 1% slope, curb, gutter, and sidewalk required what is the minimum design standards and concerns from the civil engineer.

No one from the public present to speak.

Commissioner Elieson motioned to close the public hearing, Commissioner Weight seconded that motion.

PUBLIC PORTION OF MEETING CLOSED

Commissioners had a brief discussion regarding fencing and materials. Ms. Martinez advised they will return in July for a conditional use and have to fence much more and appropriate along 7200 with a little side. Commissioner Weight said he would propose that we accept with staff recommendations and a delay on the curb until appropriate storm drain facilities are in place, is ok with standard fencing requirements. Commissioner Cripps said he is still concerned, and what can they do to move that along. Ms. Martinez said do not need to address the waiver right now, they will come back and address the fencing as part of the conditions.

Motion: To approve application #31136 with staff recommendations. Motion by: Commissioner Cripps 2nd by: Commissioner Richards Vote: Commissioners voted unanimous in favor (of commissioners present)

Magna Metro Township Planning Commission – May 14, 2020 – Meeting Summary Page 2 of 5

PUBLIC HEARING(S) 31117 – Miguel Munevar is requesting approval to rezone four existing lots from R-2-6.5 (Medium Density Residential) zone to R-M (High Density Residential) zone. Acreage: approximately .64 acres. Location: 2943 South Dora Street. Planner: Travis Hair

Greater Salt Lake Municipal Services District Planner Travis Hair provided an analysis of the Staff Report.

Commissioners and staff had a brief discussion regarding height and setbacks, plat amendment, and zoning conditions.

PUBLIC PORTION OF HEARING OPENED

Speaker # 1: Representative Southland LLC Name: Miguel Munevar Address: 2530 West Evening Dove Circle Comments: Mr. Munevar said the previous owner bought and none of the services go to the lot. Big investment for all utilities, better to sale the lot. Additionally, water and sewer all the way down 8400 west and bring into the lot to work. Better to add two units. Reason for R-M zone is the upset between dwelling units. Five units on southern and five on the northern, meet all the requirements and middle will be a turn around.

Commissioner Cripps asked if Mr. Munevar had a problem with only ten units. Mr. Munevar said not a problem at all.

Commissioner Weight motioned to open the public hearing, Commissioner Elieson seconded that motion.

Speaker # 2: Citizen Name: Kari Riley Address: 2958 South 8400 West Comments: Ms. Riley asked if these will be up for rent or sold like townhomes. Addressing traffic through dead end road adding another 20 cars to the street.

Speaker # 3: Citizen Name: Roy Christensen Address: 2948 South 8400 West Comments: Mr. Christensen said he is east of the property, other side has four nice brick homes facing 8400, lots are set up for being a duplicate of these. Too much impact on this small area to have 10 dwellings there and what about the parking for the homes, access is not that great, not enough room and will be a disaster only one way out, dead end street, property value will go down putting those in there and safety issue with busy street on 8400 west and add 20 more cars at least, not a wise move. Fine with making four single dwelling homes comparable to the east of them, that would be a good solution, way too much impact on a small area to put in 10 family dwellings on four little lots.

Magna Metro Township Planning Commission – May 14, 2020 – Meeting Summary Page 3 of 5

Mr. Hair said apartments are prohibited, individual owners can’t restrict for long term rentals, whole development rentals cannot be done.

Speaker # 4: Citizen Name: Caralee Riley Address: 2958 South 8400 West Comments: Ms. Riley said she is concerned as well as Mr. Christensen, doesn’t live on Robin Street, not a very wide road. Send a lot of people there trying to find another address and a lot of traffic. Would not mind four single homes mimicking theirs adding 20 cars, problem getting out of their driveway.

Speaker # 5: Citizen Name: Felix Montero Address: 2928 South 8400 West Comments: Mr. Montero said he agrees with Mr. Christensen. Access in and out of the street is already hard and if you add 10 additional households, 20 per say additional cars it will make it even more difficult. As well as the property value comment.

Speaker # 6: Citizen Name: Joaquin Correa Address: 2938 South 8400 West Comments: Mr. Correa said he would propose that we accept with staff recommendations and a delay on the curb until appropriate storm drain facilities are in place. He is okay with standard fencing requirements. Right behind his property and way too crowded, enough with the apartments. Four house, single family.

Commissioner Weight motioned to close the public hearing, Commissioner Elieson seconded that motion.

Speaker # 1: Representative Southland LLC Name: Miguel Munevar Address: 2530 West Evening Dove Circle Comments: Mr. Munevar said eight houses behind their lot for duplexes, could have built eight units with four rooms each, proposing less, only 30 bedrooms as compared to 32. Trying to get smaller families and less units. Lot has been abandoned for a while because of the cost. Parking will be covered garages and driveway with an extra car, around 20 cars. Current houses on 8400 west usually have two to three cars and have one around the corner, want to clean that area of mechanic shop. Three-bedroom condos, instead of four-bedroom duplexes account for less bedrooms.

Mr. Hair said these items are conditional use permits and will address that after along with the approval. Will have to clear county engineering and parking with adequate off-street parking. Mr. Munevar can put a restriction on the number of bedrooms per unit.

PUBLIC PORTION OF HEARING CLOSED

Commissioners and staff had a brief discussion regarding surrounding zoning.

Motion: To recommend application #31117 to the Magna Metro Township Council for approval with staff recommendations and a limit to 10 dwelling units. Motion by: Commissioner Weight 2nd by: Commissioner Elieson

Magna Metro Township Planning Commission – May 14, 2020 – Meeting Summary Page 4 of 5

Vote: Commissioner Richards voted nay, all other commissioners voted in favor (of commissioners present). Motion passed.

Commissioner Elieson motioned to adjourn. MEETING ADJOURNED Time Adjourned – 7:32 p.m.

Magna Metro Township Planning Commission – May 14, 2020 – Meeting Summary Page 5 of 5 Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 • Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Phone: (385) 468-6700 • Fax: (385) 468-6674 www.msd.utah.gov

File # 31169

Conditional Use Summary and Recommendation

Public Body: Magna Township Planning Commission Meeting Date: June 11, 2020 Parcel ID: 14-29-478-018-0000 Current Zone: R-2-6.5 Property Address: 3330 South 8000 West Request: Conditional Use approval for an Oversized Accessory Building at 3,000 square feet -with a total square footage of approximately 5,516 square feet for all accessory buildings on a lot greater than ½ acre. Applicant Name: Dinah and Jack Neilsen

MSD Planner: Diana Martinez MSD Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval with conditions

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicants, Dinah and Jack Neilsen, are requesting Conditional Use approval for an oversized accessory building. The proposed building would be 3,000 square feet in size. However, two existing accessory buildings are located on the property resulting in a total square footage of approximately 5,516 square feet for all accessory buildings on a lot greater than ½ acre. Is approved, the total square footage of accessory buildings will exceed the allowed maximum 25% coverage for the rear yard by approximately 240 square feet.

The applicants have stated that this proposed garage would be used to store cars and other equipment.

SITE & VICINITY DESCRIPTION (see attached map)

The subject property has frontage on 8000 West. This subject property is zoned R-2-6.5 and contains 0.71 acres of land.

Properties to the north, west and east are zoned R-1-6, with the properties to the direct south being zoned R-2- 6.5.

Request: Conditional Use File #: 31169

GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS

The current General Plan for Magna Metro Township was adopted September 2012. The property is located on a mapped General Plan corridor which is labeled as an area of “Stability”. These areas have a limited potential for the absorption of growth and are likely to experience only minor changes over time.

ISSUES OF CONCERN/PROPOSED MITIGATION

Issues of concern for this proposal include the size of the proposed detached garage. The applicant currently has a 1,298 sq.ft. detached garage and a 1,217 sq. ft pool house. Although this property is bigger than many of the surrounding properties, there is a lot of impervious coverage (existing structures) in the rear yard.

The Grading Supervisor is asking that a sediment and erosion control plan be submitted for technical review. The Urban Hydrologist is asking how storm drain water will be accounted for on this property. The applicants will be required to address these items.

NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE

Notice has been sent out to property owners within 300’ of the property. No responses have been received as of the writing of this report.

REVIEWING AGENCIES RESPONSE

All of the agency reviewers have come back with “Conceptual Ok’ed” responses, meaning the proposed conceptual plan is acceptable, but revisions and/or more information may be needed.

PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS

Magna Ordinances:

19.14.030 Conditional Uses In all R-1 zones: Accessory uses and buildings customarily incidental to a conditional use. And accessory building or buildings where the total square footage exceeds eight hundred square feet on lots under on half-acre or one thousand two hundred square feet on lots one-half acre or larger;

19.14.70 Coverage Of Rear Yards No accessory building or group of accessory buildings shall cover more than twenty-five percent of the rear yard.

Conditional Use Summary Page 2 of 3

Request: Conditional Use File #: 31169

PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION

The MSD Planning Staff is recommending to the Planning Commission that this application request for Conditional Use for an Oversized Accessory Building at 3,000 square feet -with a total square footage of 5,516 square feet for all accessory buildings on a lot greater than ½ acre be approved with the following condition: 1. Applicant to comply with all Agency Reviewer recommendations and requirements prior to final land use approval. 2. Obtain a building permit for the construction of the garage.

Conditional Use Summary Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 KEYNOTES

F I V E D E G R E E S D E S I G N 1457 EAST 840 NORTH OREM, UTAH 84097 801.850.4583 A [email protected] DATE: 20 APRIL 2020 PROJECT #: 20-022 DRAWN BY: RDW CHECKED BY: BCH

REVISIONS

1 2 3 4 75'-0"

25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" B D D 10'-0" 10'-0"

C C 20'-0" 20'-0" 40'-0" 40'-0"

B B

OVERHEAD DOOR OVERHEAD DOOR MAN DOOR

10'-0" 14' X 12' 14' X 12' 10'-0"

A A C 12'-6" 12'-6" 12'-6" 12'-6" 12'-6" 12'-6"

75'-0"

i t 1 2 3 4 c PROJECT

\ t C2 i MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

R AE101 OGI SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

\ GENERAL NOTES

n CONSTRUCTION

i w A. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS

AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT

0 \ ANY SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT.

n g B. COORDINATE INSTALLATIONS OF ALL "AFTER

M ADDRESS: CONTRACT" ASSEMBLIES WITH OWNER PRIOR TO

o 3330 SOUTH 8000 WEST

i CONSTRUCTION OF ADJOINING OR RELATED

c u STRUCTURES. MAGNA, UTAH 84044

s n C. PROVIDE 18" MINIMUM CLEAR FLOOR SPACE AT PULL

I SIDE OF ALL DOORS. PROVIDE 12" MINIMUM CLEAR

FLOOR SPACE AT PUSH SIDE OF ALL DOORS.

0 D. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF METAL STUD TO FACE OF

2 METAL STUD.

0 D 2 E. ALL COLORS SELECTIONS AND FINISH MATERIALS AND

t STYLES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER.

e j F. LOCATE DOOR JAMBS 4" FROM WALLS U.N.O.

G. SEE SHEET AE151 FOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN.

: H. SEE SHEET AE171 AND AE172 FOR FINISH INFORMATION. Y I. SEE AE601 FOR DOOR AND WINDOW INFORMATION. J. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVE MAIN LEVEL FLOOR

A ALL APPLIANCES WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PURCHASING PLAN

2 EQUIPMENT AND FABRICATING MILLWORK.

1 K. SEE G1002 FOR WALL TYPES.

2 L. PROVIDE BACKING FOR WALL MOUNTED ITEMS AND

2 / EQUIPMENT.

/ 4 M. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. AE101 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

F I V E D E G R E E S D E S I G N 1457 EAST 840 NORTH OREM, UTAH 84097 801.850.4583 A [email protected] DATE: 20 APRIL 2020 PROJECT #: 20-022 DRAWN BY: RDW CHECKED BY: BCH

REVISIONS

2'-0" SETBACK EXISTING BUILDING

c PROJECT

n EXISTING BUILDING

R OGI

n CONSTRUCTION

M ADDRESS:

o 3330 SOUTH 8000 WEST

c u MAGNA, UTAH 84044

G EXISTING BUILDING

2 2'-0"

\ SETBACK

" D C

Y ARCHITECTURAL SITE

A PLAN

0 D1 SITE PLAN

2 AS101

/ SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" 4 AS101 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 KEYNOTES 1 2 3 4

F I V E D E G R E E S D E S I G N 1457 EAST 840 NORTH OREM, UTAH 84097 801.850.4583 A [email protected]

17'-8" DATE: 12 MAY 2020 PROJECT #: 20-022 TOP OF RIDGE OF TOP DRAWN BY: RDW CHECKED BY: BCH MAIN LEVEL 100' -0" REVISIONS

A2 EAST ELEVATION AE201 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

4 3 2 1

B 17'-8" TOP OF RIDGE OF TOP

MAIN LEVEL 100' -0"

B2 WEST ELEVATION AE201 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

A B C D

C 17'-8" GENERAL NOTES TOP OF RIDGE OF TOP

t v A. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND

r . MAIN LEVEL

V DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY 100' -0"

o i SIGNIFICANT DISCREPANCIES TO THE ARCHITECT.

c PROJECT

u r B. COORDINATE INSTALLATIONS OF ALL "AFTER CONTRACT"

s n ASSEMBLIES WITH OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF

I ADJOINING OR RELATED STRUCTURES.

\ C. ROOFING TO BE CLASS 'C' MINIMUM. t C2 i NORTH ELEVATION

v e D. PROVIDE METAL FLASHING AND COUNTER FLASHING AS

R AE201 OGI SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 REQUIRED TO PROVIDE WATERPROOF BUILDING. NO PLASTIC

s g FLASHING ALLOWED.

n CONSTRUCTION

i w D C B A E. EXPOSED CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALLS TO RECEIVE

RUBBED FINISH. ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS MAY NOT BE

0 \ SHOWN. REFER TO ENGINEERING SHEETS FOR ALL

n g REQUIRED PENETRATIONS AND DETAILING.

M ADDRESS:

- F. SEE MECHANICAL SHEETS FOR BATHROOM EXHAUSE,

o 3330 SOUTH 8000 WEST i CLOTHES DRYER VENTS, AND OTHER PENETRATIONS IN

c u MAGNA, UTAH 84044 r EXTERIOR WALLS AND ROOF.

s n G. SEE PLUMBING SHEETS FOR GAS METER AND SECONDARY

I ROOF DRAINAGE BRASS SCUPPER LOCATIONS ALONG

EXTERIOR WALLS.

0 H. SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR ELECTRICAL METER, GEAR,

\ AND EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE LOCATIONS. 0 D

0 I. SEE AE601 FOR DOOR AND WINDOW INFORMATION.

2 17'-8"

s t J. PROVIDE PRE-FINISHED CUT ALUMINUM NUMBERS AND

e j LETTERS ON THE FRONT, EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING

o TOP OF RIDGE OF TOP

P INDICATING THE BUILDING ADDRESS ASSIGNED BY THE CITY

: IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT CITY ORDINANCE. COLOR Y MAIN LEVEL 100' -0" OF NUMBERS AND LETTERS TO CONTRAST SIGNIFICANTLY WITH BACKGROUND COLOR OF EXTERIOR WALL. THE M EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

A ADDRESS MUST BE PERMANENTLY FASTENED TO THE

5 EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.

0 K. THE OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE TO OBTAIN A SEPARATE

2 PERMIT FOR ANY EXTERIOR SIGNS IN ACCORDANCE WITH

0 D2 SOUTH ELEVATION

2 / THE CURRENT CITY SIGN ORDINANCE.

1 AE201

/ SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 5 AE201 1 2 3 4 5

Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 • Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Phone: (385) 468-6700 • Fax: (385) 468-6674 www.msd.utah.gov

File # 31146

Conditional Use Summary and Recommendation

Public Body: Magna Metro Township Planning Commission Meeting Date: June 11, 2020 Parcel ID: 14-33-351-004-0000, 14-33-351-008-0000, 14-33-351-010-0000 Current Zone: M-1 (all three parcels) Property Address: 7930 West 4100 South Request: Conditional Use approval for an Office/ Warehouse use Applicant Name: Shaun Johnson

MSD Planner: Diana Martinez MSD Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval with conditions

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant, Shaun Johnson, is requesting Conditional Use approval for an office/warehouse use. The project site is comprised of three parcels with a combined acreage of approximately 32.76 acres. The property is currently vacant. The applicant is intending to create an industrial park area on the three parcels, with additional office warehouse buildings in the future. Currently, the applicant is asking for approval of the first office warehouse building. Additional office warehouse buildings will come back to the Planning Commission for preliminary review and approval.

SITE & VICINITY DESCRIPTION (see attached map)

The subject property is located on the northeast corner of 4100 South and 8000 West. To the north is Universal Forest Products manufacturing plant. To the east is an office warehouse for Northrop Grumman. This property has been annexed into West Valley City. Across 8000 West to the west is the Salt Lake Valley Fire Service area, used for the fire department’s training.

Request: Conditional Use File #: 31146

ZONE CONSIDERATIONS

Chapters 19.68 -Lot Requirements Requirement Zone (M-1) Height None No commercial or industrial building or Front Yard Setback structure shall be located closer than 20 feet to any street. Side Yard Setback None Rear Yard Setback None Lot Width None Lot Area None No building, structure or group of buildings, with their accessory buildings, Lot Coverage shall cover more than 80 percent of the area of the lot.

GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS

The General Plan for Magna Metro Township was adopted September 2012. The property is located on a mapped General Plan corridor which is labeled as an area of “moderate change” and partially labeled “focused change”. Therefore, the development of this land is encouraged. It should be noted that the General Plan for the Magna Metro Township is currently being updated by the MSD Planning Staff.

ISSUES OF CONCERN/PROPOSED MITIGATION

The main Issue of concern for this project is that this property is located in the Overpressure Area.

19.76.270 - Overpressure area. Development in the overpressure area as defined in Section 15.14.010 and shown on the special development standards areas map shall comply with Sections 15.14.030, 15.14.040, 15.14.050 and this section. The special development standards areas map is available in the development services division office during regular office hours.

15.14 - Construction standards in overpressure area

15.14.010 - Definition.

The term "overpressure area" means the 0.2 and greater overpressure area surrounding the Hercules Bacchus Works Property located south of 4100 South and west of 6400 West, Salt Lake County as shown on the map entitled "Special Development Standards Areas," located in the development services division office at 2001 South State Street, which map is adopted as part of this chapter and incorporated herein by reference. The boundaries of the special development standards areas approximate the range of overpressure lines acknowledging existing property lines and physical features where possible. The overpressure areas referred to in this section are based on an explosion of twenty thousand pounds of TNT equivalent for areas number one, two and three, and sixty-five thousand pounds of TNT equivalent for area number four. The approximate centers of the overpressure areas are:

Conditional Use Summary Page 2 of 5 Request: Conditional Use File #: 31146

Area #1—2,500 feet west of 7200 West Street, and 1,700 feet south of 4100 South Street.

Area #2—2,000 feet west of 6400 West Street, and 2,400 feet north of 5400 South Street.

Area #3—1,800 feet east of Highway 111, and 2,800 feet north of 5400 South Street.

Area #4—7,000 feet west of Highway 111, and 1,400 feet north of 5400 South Street.

(Ord. 1158 § 2, 1991; Ord. 1024 § 2 (part), 1988: Ord. 1012 § 1 (part), 1987)

15.14.020 - Purpose.

Property within the overpressure area may be subject to significant overpressure waves and fragments in the event of an accidental explosion of energized materials which are manufactured, stored or handled. In order to provide for the health, safety and welfare of residents within the overpressure area, this chapter provides construction standards for all property located within such area.

(Ord. 1024 § 2 (part), 1988: Ord. 1012 § 1(part), 1987)

15.14.030 - Applicability of standards.

The standards in this chapter shall be applicable to all new construction requiring a building permit within the overpressure area as shown on the special development standards areas map. Such construction shall include new buildings and/or modification or additions to existing buildings.

(Ord. 1024 § 2(part), 1988: Ord. 1012 § 1 (part), 1987)

15.14.040 - Standards.

A.Commercial and industrial buildings, where permitted in the 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 PSI overpressure areas, shall:1.Be certified by a licensed structural engineer that the proposed structures are designed to withstand the wind loads of the overpressure area in which they are located on all exterior vertical and horizontal surfaces;2.Conform to the glass standards contained in Section 15.14.050.B.Residential buildings, where permitted in the 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 PSI overpressure areas, shall:1.Be designed, where feasible, with windowless walls or minimum glass surfaces facing towards the center of the overpressure area. Where possible, the garage or carport shall be placed on the side of the building facing the center of the overpressure area;2.Conform to the glass standards contained in Section 15.14.050.

(Ord. 1024 § 2 (part), 1988: Ord. 1012 § 1 (part), 1987)

15.14.050 - Glass requirements.

A.The window pane size requirements in the overpressure areas shall be as follows:

Overpressure Area as Shown on Map (PSI) Maximum Size of Window Pane (sq. ft.)

0.50 9.0

0.30 12.0

0.20 15.0

B.Additional requirements:1.All windows shall be double glazed.2.Each layer of glass shall be a minimum thickness of one-eighth inch.3.The size of pane is measured between mullions.4.Each building

Conditional Use Summary Page 3 of 5 Request: Conditional Use File #: 31146 located in the overpressure area shall be designed, where feasible, to minimize the amount of glass facing the center of the overpressure area.5.Maximum width of any window pane shall be four feet.

(Ord. 1491 § 4, 2002: Ord. 1158 § 3, 1991; Ord. 1024 § 2 (part), 1988: Ord. 1012 § 1 (part), 1987)

The subject property is in the highest PSI range of the Overpressure area, which is 0.5 PSI. The construction of the proposed building will be required to comply with the ordinance. At this level, the property is not allowed to be subdivided and not allowed to be used for residential lots/uses.

Construction of future buildings on the site will require a code/ordinance amendment to allow for the property to be subdivided within the 0.5 PSI Overpressure Area. The MSD Planning Staff and legal counsel are currently working on revising the text for the proposed code/ordinance amendment. This item will be brought to the Planning Commission at a later date for review and consideration.

NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE

Notice has been sent out to property owners within 300’ of this property. No response has been received as of the writing of this report.

REVIEWING AGENCIES RESPONSE

The agency reviewers have come back with “Conceptual Ok’ed” responses, meaning the proposed conceptual plan is acceptable, but revisions and/or more information will be required for technical review.

PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS

19.84.050 Approval/Denial Authority The planning commission has the authority to approve, deny, or approve with conditions conditional use applications.

1. Planning Commission Approval. 1. The planning commission shall review and approve or deny each application during a public meeting. 2. The planning commission's decision shall be based on information presented through the public meeting process, including: the materials submitted by the applicant, the recommendation of the director or director's designee, and input from interested parties and affected entities. 3. If conditions are specified, the director or director's designee shall issue a final approval letter upon satisfaction of the planning commission's conditions of approval. 4. If the applicant fails to meet all conditions of approval within twelve months of the planning commission's decision, the application is deemed denied. A twelve-month extension may be granted upon the payment of an additional filing fee equal to the original filing fee. 5. A planning commission decision shall be made on a complete conditional use application within a reasonable time frame, not to exceed ninety days. The planning commission is authorized to

Conditional Use Summary Page 4 of 5 Request: Conditional Use File #: 31146

review and take action on an application as outlined in Section 19.84.040 after having notified the applicant of the meeting date. 6. Failure by the applicant to provide information that has been requested by the planning commission, the director or director's designee to resolve conflicts with the standards in Section 19.84.060 (above) may result in an application being denied. 2. Decision. Each conditional use application shall be: 1. Approved if the proposed use, including the manner and design in which a property is proposed for development, complies with the standards for approval outlined in Section 19.84.060; or 2. Approved with conditions if the anticipated detrimental effects of the use, including the manner and design in which the property is proposed for development, can be mitigated with the imposition of reasonable conditions to bring about compliance with the standards outlined in Section 19.84.060; or 3. Denied if the anticipated detrimental effects of the proposed use cannot be mitigated with the imposition of reasonable conditions of approval to bring about compliance with the standards outlined in Section 19.84.060.

PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION

The MSD Planning Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission grant Conditional Use approval for the Office/Warehouse use subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all MSD and Outside Agency Reviewer requirements and recommendations prior to final application approval. 2. All bonds for improvements and final fees related to the application be posted and/or paid prior to final approval. 3. Compliance with Ordinance 15.14 for construction standards in overpressure area be met. 4. All three parcels involved in this application must remain under the same ownership. 5. All site plans, building plans and elevations be brought back to the Planning Commission for final land use approval. 6. Preliminary approval is only for this first office warehouse building in the southwest corner of the property owned by Magna 71 LLC. No subdivision of the property is approved with this application.

Conditional Use Summary Page 5 of 5

FFE=4571.50

47,040 S.F. 47,040 BUILDING A BUILDING

FUTURE PHASE

CIR ENGINEERING, L.L.C. KEYNOTES Key Value Keynote Text LEGEND GENERAL NOTES

5/10/2020 2:19:43 PM 2:19:43 5/10/2020 x 1. INTERIOR DIMENSION AT FACE OF STUD. EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS AT FACE OF TILT-UP PANEL. 145-2 = DOOR TAGS = DETAILS CALL-OUTS TAGS 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL COLORS AND MATERIALS. x/x 3. INSTALL ALL MATERIALS PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION. 4. ALL GYP. BOARD SURFACES TO BE TAPED, SANDED, AND PRIMED. 5. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS. A = STOREFRONT WALL TAGS = SECTION CUTS TAGS 6. COORDINATE ALL WINDOWS HEAD HEIGHTS AND SIZES WITH ELEVATIONS AND SCHEDULES. x 7. FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CONTINUOUS BOTH HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY AND SHALL EXTEND FROM RATED x.x ASSEMBLY TO RATED ASSEMBLY. FIRE CAULK ALL PENETRATIONS. xx/xxx = KEYNOTE TAGS 8. FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, SMOKE DETECTORS, OTHER EMERGENCY DEVICE LOCATIONS, AND RATINGS SHALL BE APPROVED BY FIRE MARSHAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 100 = ROOM NUMBER 9. FRAMING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL BLOCKING THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE WALL-MOUNTED FURNISHINGS, ARTWORK, ETC. 10. DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" OFF OF ADJACENT WALL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 11. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE SUBMITTALS AND SHOP DRAWINGS ON ALL KEYNOTED ITEMS FOR APPROVAL FROM C6 = WALL TYPE TAGS; SEE WALL TYPES ON G006 OWNER/ARCHITECT. "C" = WALL TYPE 12. PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY EXTERIOR FINISHES, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL COLORS AND TYPES OF MATERIALS WITH "6" = STUD SIZE OWNER/ARCHITECT 13. ALL ASPECTS OF THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND THE ASSOCIATED DETAILS - SEE G003 AND G004. IF CONFLICTS OCCUR WHICH MAKE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ADA IMPOSSIBLE, NOTIFY ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY BEFORE CONTINUING THE WORK.

5/10/2020 2:19:43 PM

D PERMIT SET

A201

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 336' - 0"

56' - 0" 56' - 0" 56' - 0" 56' - 0" 56' - 0" 56' - 0"

A A ARDERO 800004100 W. S. MAGNA, UT 84044 60'- 0"

C MAGNAWAREHOUSE

B B HESE DRAWINGS OR DESIGN ARESHOWN SUBJECT LEGALTO ACTION.

WAREHOUSE CORE & SHELL

140'- 0" 101

A201 e

a 40'- 0"

A201 A3 D

FIRE RISER & ROOF ACCESS LADDER

103 d

C C T n

i SPECIFIC PROJECT IS PROHOBITED THE WITHOUT PRIOR CONSENT WRITTEN AEOF URBIA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS. PROHIBITEDANY USE T OF

S THIS

M 40'- 0" PROJECT # LEVEL 01 FLOOR PLAN

D D THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AEARCHITECTS URBIA & ENGINEERS AND THEIR CONSULTANTS. REPRODUCTION,ANY COPYING OR USE OTHER THAN FOR

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DATE: PROJECT ISSUE DATE

A201

PROJECT STATUS SHEET #:

4'0 8' 16' 1 LEVEL 1 A101 3/32" = 1'-0" GRAPHIC SCALE A101

NORTH COPYRIGHT A

5/10/2020 2:19:43 PM 2:19:43 5/10/2020 AE URBIA, LLC. C:\Users\gthomas\Desktop\0_Working Folder\AE2019.347 --Magna Folder\AE2019.347 Ardero Warehouse.rvt C:\Users\gthomas\Desktop\0_Working 5 4 3 2 1 THESE ANDDRAWINGS THE DESIGN SHOWN HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR SPECIFIC THIS PROJECT OF AS AN SERVICEINSTRUMENT AND SHALL REMAIN KEYNOTES Key Value Keynote Text LEGEND ROOFING NOTES (TYPICAL): 5/10/2020 2:19:44 PM 2:19:44 5/10/2020 08/011 ROOF ACCESS HATCH x 1. PROVIDE FULL MANUFACTURERS WARRANTY ON MATERIALS AND 5 YEAR 22/002 ROOF DRAIN - SEE DETAILS 145-2 = DOOR TAGS = DETAILS CALL-OUTS TAGS WARRANTY MIN. ON LABOR. UNO x/x 2. ALL COLORS, ASSEMBLIES AND MATERIALS MUST MEET APPROVAL OF OWNER AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. 3. PROVIDE PRODUCT SUBMITTALS FOR PRE APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDERING AND A = STOREFRONT WALL TAGS = SECTION CUTS TAGS INSTALLATION x 4. FOR TYPICAL ROOF/FLASHING DETAILS, SEE SHEET A402 x.x 5. PROVIDE STEP FLASHING COUNTER FLASHING, DRIP EDGES AS REQ'D. CAULK AND xx/xxx = KEYNOTE TAGS SEAL. ROOFING TO EXTEND 18" MIN. UP ADJACENT WALLS AND DISCONTINUITIES TYPICAL. 100 = ROOM NUMBER 6. INSTALL ROOF PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. MANUFACTURER TO INSPECT INSTALLATION AS REQ'D FOR WARRANTEE. PROVIDE 1/4" PER FOOT MIN. SLOPE. 7. FOR ALL PLUMBING PENETRATIONS REFER TO DETAILS ON A402 AND PLUMBING C6 = WALL TYPE TAGS; SEE WALL TYPES ON G006 DRAWINGS. "C" = WALL TYPE 8. FOR MISC. ROOF DETAILS SEE A402 "6" = STUD SIZE 9. TYPICAL MINIMUM ROOF SLOPE @ 1/4" MIN. PER FOOT ALL PLACES. 10. SEE MECHANICAL PLAN FOR ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND CURBS, ET.

5/10/2020 2:19:44 PM

D PERMIT SET

A201

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 336' - 0"

56' - 0" 56' - 0" 56' - 0" 56' - 0" 56' - 0" 56' - 0"

A A

22/002 22/002 22/002 ARDERO 800004100 W. S.

0 MAGNA, UT 84044

C MAGNAWAREHOUSE

B B HESE DRAWINGS OR DESIGN ARESHOWN SUBJECT LEGALTO ACTION.

A201 e

A201 A3 D

22/002 22/002 22/002 e

08/011 c

C C T n

i SPECIFIC PROJECT IS PROHOBITED THE WITHOUT PRIOR CONSENT WRITTEN AEOF URBIA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS. PROHIBITEDANY USE T OF

S THIS

4 PROJECT # ROOF PLAN

D D THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AEARCHITECTS URBIA & ENGINEERS AND THEIR CONSULTANTS. REPRODUCTION,ANY COPYING OR USE OTHER THAN FOR

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DATE: PROJECT ISSUE DATE

A201

PROJECT STATUS SHEET #:

4'0 8' 16' 1 ROOF PLAN A103 3/32" = 1'-0" GRAPHIC SCALE A103

NORTH COPYRIGHT A

5/10/2020 2:19:44 PM 2:19:44 5/10/2020 AE URBIA, LLC. C:\Users\gthomas\Desktop\0_Working Folder\AE2019.347 --Magna Folder\AE2019.347 Ardero Warehouse.rvt C:\Users\gthomas\Desktop\0_Working 5 4 3 2 1 THESE ANDDRAWINGS THE DESIGN SHOWN HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR SPECIFIC THIS PROJECT OF AS AN SERVICEINSTRUMENT AND SHALL REMAIN KEYNOTES Key Value Keynote Text 5/10/2020 2:19:45 PM 2:19:45 5/10/2020

SW 7006 EXTRA WHITE SW 7646 FIRST STAR SW 7067 CITYSCAPE ANODIZED BLACK GRAY GLAZING W/ BLACK STOREFRONT ALUMINUM (SAME AS BUILDING TO THE NORTH)

5/10/2020 2:19:45 PM

T.O. WALL 3 D 140' - 0" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PERMIT SET T.O. WALL 2 138' - 0" T.O. WALL 1 136' - 0" DECK BEARING 134' - 0"

CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0"

LEVEL 2 114' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" B.O. WALL 1 98' - 7 1/2" T.O. FOOTING 1 98' - 6"

B.O. WALL 2 0 8' 16' 24' 94' - 7 1/2" C5 SOUTH ELEVATION T.O. FOOTING 2 A201 3/32" = 1'-0" GRAPHIC SCALE 94' - 6" ARDERO 800004100 W. S. MAGNA, UT 84044

T.O. WALL 3 C 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 140' - 0" T.O. WALL 2 138' - 0" T.O. WALL 1

136' - 0" MAGNAWAREHOUSE DECK BEARING 134' - 0"

CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0"

LEVEL 2 HESE DRAWINGS OR DESIGN ARESHOWN SUBJECT LEGALTO ACTION. 114' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" B.O. WALL 1 98' - 7 1/2"

e T.O. FOOTING 1 t

98' - 6"

B.O. WALL 2 v

94' - 7 1/2" R T.O. FOOTING 2

0 8' 16' 24' e

94' - 6" l B5 NORTH ELEVATION u

A201 3/32" = 1'-0" GRAPHIC SCALE h

i SPECIFIC PROJECT IS PROHOBITED THE WITHOUT PRIOR CONSENT WRITTEN AEOF URBIA ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS. PROHIBITEDANY USE T OF

S THIS

B T.O. WALL 3 T.O. WALL 3 140' - 0" 140' - 0" D C B A A B C D T.O. WALL 2 T.O. WALL 2

138' - 0" R

138' - 0" A T.O. WALL 1 T.O. WALL 1 M 136' - 0" 136' - 0" DECK BEARING DECK BEARING 134' - 0" 134' - 0" PROJECT # CLEAR HEIGHT CLEAR HEIGHT BUIDLING 128' - 0" 128' - 0" ELEVATIONS

LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2 114' - 0" 114' - 0" THE SOLE PROPERTY OF AEARCHITECTS URBIA & ENGINEERS AND THEIR CONSULTANTS. REPRODUCTION,ANY COPYING OR USE OTHER THAN FOR LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" 100' - 0" B.O. WALL 1 DATE: PROJECT ISSUE B.O. WALL 1 DATE 98' - 7 1/2" 98' - 7 1/2" T.O. FOOTING 1 T.O. FOOTING 1 98' - 6" 98' - 6"

PROJECT STATUS SHEET #: B.O. WALL 2 B.O. WALL 2 94' - 7 1/2" 94' - 7 1/2"

T.O. FOOTING 2 T.O. FOOTING 2 94' - 6" 94' - 6" A201 A5 EAST ELEVATION 0 8' 16' 24' A3 WEST ELEVATION 0 8' 16' 24' A201 3/32" = 1'-0" A201 3/32" = 1'-0" GRAPHIC SCALE GRAPHIC SCALE COPYRIGHT A

5/10/2020 2:19:45 PM 2:19:45 5/10/2020 AE URBIA, LLC. C:\Users\gthomas\Desktop\0_Working Folder\AE2019.347 --Magna Folder\AE2019.347 Ardero Warehouse.rvt C:\Users\gthomas\Desktop\0_Working 5 4 3 2 1 THESE ANDDRAWINGS THE DESIGN SHOWN HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR SPECIFIC THIS PROJECT OF AS AN SERVICEINSTRUMENT AND SHALL REMAIN

Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 • Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Phone: (385) 468-6700 • Fax: (385) 468-6674 msd.utah.gov

File #31170

Rezone Summary and Recommendation

Public Body: Magna Metro Township Planning Commission Meeting Date: June 11, 2020 Parcel ID: 14-30-256-035-0000 Current Zone: R-1-6 Proposed Zone: R-1-3 Property Address: 3027 South 9150 West Request: Rezone Applicant Name: Spencer Pack

Planner: Diana Martinez Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval with zoning conditions

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant< Spencer Pack, is proposing to rezone the subject property in order to allow for a single-family dwelling to be built on this lot which is smaller than the current zoning allows.

It is believed that this lot was divided illegally and is the reason for the non-complying property size.

If this application for a rezone from the R-1-6 zone change to R-1-3 zone is approved, the applicant will need to go through the subdivision process to make this lot a legal lot of record prior to a building permit being issued.

SITE & VICINITY DESCRIPTION (see attached map)

The property is in the neighborhood of existing R-1-6 zoning located to the West of Cyprus High School. To the north, closer to Magna Main, the zoning changes to R-2-6.5.

Request: Rezone File #: 31170

GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS

The property is located in a stable area on the General Plan Map. These areas have a limited potential for the absorption of growth and are likely to experience only minor changes in overall character over time. The level of stability of the Blue area is defined as follows: 1) Subtle changes in land use may occur. Overall, land uses in the area/corridor will exhibit less diversity and less intensity. Changes will be limited to a small number of dispersed sites, leaving the majority of the area/corridor unchanged. 2) Improvements may occur which subtly alter the appearance, economics, or sustainability of the area/corridor. Most improvements will consist of individual projects and may not require coordination with parcels beyond their immediate vicinity. 3) Mobility networks are less formalized and will remain largely as built, but minor changes may occur. Public transit typically will have no dedicated right-of-way.

Goal 5 of the General Plan discusses housing choices, and the following objective is pertinent to the proposed rezoning of this property:

Objective 5.4: Encourage residential development that establishes a variety of lot sizes, dwelling types, densities, and price points, as well as an appropriate balance of owner occupied and rental units.

ZONE CONSIDERATIONS

Requirement Existing Zone R-1-6 Proposed Zone R-1-3 Height 35 feet 35 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 20 feet Side Yard Setback 5 feet and 11 feet or 8 feet each side. 5 feet each side (unless attached) Rear Yard Setback 30 feet (15 feet with garage) 20 feet (15 feet with garage) 25 feet at a distance 20’ from front lot Lot Width 60 feet min. line Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 3,000 sq. ft.

Compatibility with existing buildings in terms of size, scale and height. yes Compliance with Landscaping Requirements Verified. n/a Compliance with the General Plan. yes

ISSUES OF CONCERN/PROPOSED MITIGATION

No issues of concern have been identified for the proposed rezone.

Rezone Page 2 of 3 Request: Rezone File #: 31170

NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE

Notices were sent to the property owners within 300’ of the subject property. No responses have been received as of the writing of this report.

PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS

19.90.060 Conditions to Zoning Map Amendment

1. In order to provide more specific land use designations and land development suitability; to insure that proposed development is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; and to provide notice to property owners of limitations and requirements for development of property, conditions may be attached to any zoning map amendment which limit or restrict the following: 1. Uses; 2. Dwelling unit density; 3. Building square footage; 4. Height of structures. 2. A zoning map amendment attaching any conditions set forth in subsection A shall be designated ZC after the zoning classification on the zoning map and any such conditions shall be placed on record with the planning commission and recorded with the county recorder. 3. In the event any zoning condition is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, then the entire zoning map amendment shall be void. Any deletion in or change to zoning condition shall be considered an amendment to the zoning ordinance and shall be subject to the requirements of this chapter.

HISTORY Adopted by Ord. 17-01-03 on 1/17/2017

PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION

The MSD Planning Staff recommends that the Magna Metro Township Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the Magna Metro Township Council for approval of the rezone with the following zoning conditions: 1. The following permitted uses are prohibited from being placed on the property: 1. Residential facility for persons with a disability. 2. The following conditional uses are prohibited from being placed on the property: 1. Cemetery 2. Day care/preschool center 3. Golf course 4. Planned Unit Development 5. Private educational institutions 6. Private nonprofit recreational grounds and facilities 7. Public and quasi-public uses 8. Residential Facility for elderly persons

Rezone Page 3 of 3

Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 • Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Phone: (385) 468-6700 • Fax: (385) 468-6674 slco.org/development-services

File # 31173

Exception Request Summary and Recommendation

Public Body: Magna Township Planning Commission Meeting Date: June 11, 2020 Parcel ID: 14-21-200-017-0000, 14-21-200-012-0000, 14-21-200-021-0000 Current Zone: M-2 Property Address: 2330 South 7200 West Request: Exception Request for exception to roadway improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) Applicant Name: Scott Braithwaite

Planner: Diana Martinez Planning Staff Recommendation: Denial

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant, Scott Braithwaite, is requesting a waiver from roadway improvements for curb, gutter and sidewalk along this property frontage at 2330 South 7200 West.

The applicant came to the Planning Commission on May 14, 2020 for a Conditional Use approval of an office/warehouse use. Preliminary approval was granted for the project. At this time, the applicant is back seeking a waiver of required roadway improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk)

SITE & VICINITY DESCRIPTION (see attached map)

The subject property is located on 7200 West, just off Highway U201. The property across 7200 West to the east is in West Valley City’s jurisdiction. The property to the south is a vacant parcel that came before the Planning Commission last month for consideration of a zone change to M-2 (Basmenji #31132). The property to the north is an existing trucking and equipment storage yard.

Request: Exception Request File #: 31173

PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS

Although this property is on the north side of U201 Highway in the industrial area of Magna, Staff believes that these required roadway improvements should be installed to start the process of getting appropriate roadway improvements in this area.

This area is part of the proposed Utah Inland Port Authority dry port; therefore, Staff believes that roadways improvements will be a necessity for this area as the inland port is developed.

A recommendation will be following this packet from the County Engineer.

PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION

The MSD Planning staff recommends that the Magna Metro Township Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation to the Magna Metro Mayor (or his designee) that the Exception Request for Roadway Improvements be denied, and that the roadway improvements be installed as required.

Exception Request Summary Page 2 of 2