DOCSLIB.ORG

Benning Road & Bridges Transportation Improvements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benning Road & Bridges Transportation Improvements BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES DRAFT JUNE 2015 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRAFT MAY 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 This page left intentionally blank This page left intentionally blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The District Department of Transportation (DDOT), in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is proposing transportation improvements (the proposed action) along the Benning Road corridor in Washington, DC. The proposed action would improve transportation infrastructure conditions, enhance safety and operations along the corridor and at key intersections, enhance pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and extend streetcar transit service. FHWA is the lead federal agency for the Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental Assessment (EA), with DDOT (the Applicant) as joint lead. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA), National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), and National Park Service (NPS) are cooperating agencies. The proposed improvements are anticipated to be predominantly within DDOT right-of-way (ROW). The proposed action would also include FHWA approval to allow DDOT to use Federal Aid Route ROW on Benning Road for streetcar operations. FHWA concurred with the use of this ROW for mass transit use in a letter to DDOT dated April 18, 2013. The project is included in the adopted National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Financially Constrained Long Range Plan (CLRP). Where noted, the “Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements EA Project Team” as listed includes the technical team members also listed in Chapter 6, List of Preparers. This EA has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508), FHWA’s Environmental Impact and Related Procedures (23 CFR 771 and 774), FHWA’s Technical Advisory Guidance for Preparing and Processing Environmental and Section 4(f) Documents (T6640.8A), and DDOT’s Environmental Process Manual. The project also includes the evaluation of potential effects to cultural resources in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq.). The EA for the Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements project (“the project”) includes the Purpose and Need, Alternatives, Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences and Public and Agency Coordination, as outlined below. ES-1 PURPOSE AND NEED The purpose of the Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements project is to address deficiencies in transportation infrastructure conditions, improve safety conditions and operations for both motorized and non-motorized access, and to provide for increased mobility and accessibility by improving transit operations and options between the intersection of Benning Road, and Oklahoma Avenue and the Benning Road Metrorail Station. The Benning Road corridor is located within the Northeast section of Washington, DC. This area has been part of several studies and plans in the past including the DC Transit Future System Plan, the Benning Road Streetcar Extension Feasibility Study and the Benning Road Corridor Redevelopment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 DRAFT Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental Assessment Framework Plan. The need to improve the Benning Road corridor to safely and efficiently accommodate all modes of transportation is a recurring theme in previous planning studies. The specific needs for this project are the following: • Improve transportation infrastructure conditions; • Enhance safety and operations along the corridor and at key intersections; • Enhance and install pedestrian and bicycle facilities; and • Extend streetcar transit service. The Purpose and Need was vetted through public and agency coordination (refer to Chapter 5, Public and Agency Coordination) and was used to develop and screen alternatives (refer to Chapter 2, Alternatives). ES-2 PROJECT BACKGROUND The Benning Road corridor is approximately two miles long. The study area (the “project study area”) is shown in Figure ES-1. The western terminus for the project is the intersection of Benning Road and Oklahoma Avenue and the eastern terminus is the Benning Road Metrorail Station. This area has been part of several studies and plans in the past including the DC Transit Future System Plan, DDOT Benning Road Streetcar Extension Study and Benning Road Corridor Redevelopment Framework Plan, all of which highlight the need to improve the Benning Road corridor to safely and efficiently accommodate all modes of transportation. As described in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need, the existing bridges over DC-295 (Kenilworth Avenue) and the CSX Railroad are in need of repair or rehabilitation. The existing bridges also lack adequate sidewalks. The current intersection of Benning Road and Minnesota Avenue provides several safety and operational challenges. Pedestrian and vehicular accidents as well as delays at this intersection are commonly observed. The existing corridor shows heavy transit activity and would benefit from additional transit options such as the extension of the existing H/Benning Streetcar Line that currently terminates at the Oklahoma Avenue and Benning Road intersection. ES-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental Assessment Figure ES-1: Study Area Source: DC Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO); Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements EA Project Team, February 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-3 DRAFT Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental Assessment ES-3 ALTERNATIVES Several alternatives for the Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements project were developed in accordance with the project objectives established to meet the project Purpose and Need. The details are provided in Chapter 2, Alternatives. Three alternatives, including the No Build Alternative and two Build Alternatives, are analyzed in detail in this EA. No Build Alternative: The No Build Alternative includes the existing roadway, bridges, median, sidewalks, and transit services as shown in Figure ES-2. It assumes that the currently programmed, committed, and/or funded transportation projects in the project study area would be completed. While the No Build Alternative does not completely meet the Purpose and Need of the proposed action, it provides a baseline for comparing the environmental consequences of the Build Alternatives. Build Alternative 1: Build Alternative 1 would reconstruct portions of the roadway and some structures along Benning Road to enhance safety and operations, enhance and install pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and extend streetcar service along the study corridor. It includes the following infrastructure changes to meet the project Purpose and Need: Improve transportation infrastructure conditions • Replacement of the Benning Road Bridges over DC-295 and CSX tracks with one new bridge; Enhance safety and operations along the corridor and at key intersections • Reconstruction of the intersection of Benning Road and Minnesota Avenue to provide pedestrian safety improvements; • Providing a longer turn lane on eastbound Benning Road towards northbound Minnesota Avenue; • Providing a second left-hand turn lane from northbound Minnesota Avenue to westbound Benning Road, and extending the right-turn pocket lane from southbound Minnesota Avenue to eastbound Benning Road; • Providing ADA compliant sidewalks on both sides of the bridge; • Construction of pedestrian safety improvements at Benning Road and 36th Street; Enhance and install pedestrian and bicycle facilities • Reconstruction of sidewalks and construction of shared-use paths along the corridor; and Extend streetcar service • Construction of shared streetcar lanes and ancillary facilities including platforms and propulsion systems. ES-4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental Assessment Build Alternative 1 would provide a 12-foot, curb-running streetcar shared lane for the length of the Benning Road corridor as shown in Figure ES-3. The shared streetcar lane would be constructed in the outside lane adjacent to the curb and pedestrian facilities. It would include all facilities and structures needed for the streetcar operations including traction power substations (TPSS), catenary poles, and streetcar stops. Build Alternative 1 would place passenger loading platforms at locations about a quarter-mile apart and constructed along the eastbound and westbound directions of Benning Road at six locations as shown in Figure ES-4: • Oklahoma Avenue (western terminus); • Kingman Island; • 34th Street; • 39th Street; • 42nd Street; and • Benning Road Metrorail Station (eastern terminus). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-5 DRAFT Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental Assessment Figure ES-2: Existing/No Build Alternative Roadway Typical Sections A *Grassy buffer area varies and is not shown in sections A and B above ES-6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental Assessment Figure ES-3: Build Alternative 1 Typical Sections (Wired Propulsion System) Details of the overhead propulsion system would be determined during final design. Renderings show only one possible treatment for overhead wiring EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-7 DRAFT Benning Road and Bridges Transportation Improvements Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amazon's HQ2 Decision
    RESEARCH JULY 2019 AMAZON’S HQ2: AN UPDATE ON ITS IMPACT ON THE WASHINGTON COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE MARKET AMAZON HAS ARRIVED PROJECT’S PUBLIC COST AND INCENTIVES More than seven months after announcing its decision to locate one half of its “HQ2” in National Landing, Amazon’s plans for its new campus are • Amazon will receive $550 million in workforce cash grants coming into focus. Amazon has signed leases at four buildings in from the Commonwealth of Virginia for the creation of National Landing totaling approximately 585,000 square feet. Amazon 25,000 new jobs. Additionally, Amazon can receive up to has moved into 47,512 square feet at 2345 Crystal Drive as it quickly $200 million in grants if it delivers on an additional 12,850 begins its hiring process for HQ2, and will occupy 88,000 square feet at jobs beyond the initial requirement. 241 18th Street South, 191,000 square feet at 1800 South Bell Street and 258,000 square feet at 1770 Crystal Drive as renovations at each location • Amazon will receive a cash grant of $23 million from finish. Working with JBG Smith, the largest property owner in National Arlington County for the incremental growth of an existing Landing and Amazon’s development partner, property manager and retail local Transient Occupancy Tax over the next 15 years. leasing agent, Amazon has begun to build out its workforce. Amazon is investing upwards of $95 million in tenant renovations. Notably, 1770 • The Commonwealth of Virginia has pledged $250 million Crystal Drive, where it will occupy the entirety of the 258,000 square foot towards Virginia Tech’s $1 billion investment in a new building, will make up a majority of the renovations, accounting for $80 campus proximate to Amazon’s new headquarters, which million of the total amount.
    [Show full text]
  • [Title Over Two Lines (Shift+Enter to Break Line)]
    BUS TRANSFORMATION PROJECT White Paper #2: Strategic Considerations October 2018 DRAFT: For discussion purposes 1 1 I• Purpose of White Paper II• Vision & goals for bus as voiced by stakeholders III• Key definitions IV• Strategic considerations Table of V• Deep-dive chapters to support each strategic consideration Contents 1. What is the role of Buses in the region? 2. Level of regional commitment to speeding up Buses? 3. Regional governance / delivery model for bus? 4. What business should Metrobus be in? 5. What services should Metrobus operate? 6. How should Metrobus operate? VI• Appendix: Elasticity of demand for bus 2 DRAFT: For discussion purposes I. Purpose of White Paper 3 DRAFT: For discussion purposes Purpose of White Paper 1. Present a set of strategic 2. Provide supporting analyses 3. Enable the Executive considerations for regional relevant to each consideration Steering Committee (ESC) to bus transformation in a neutral manner set a strategic direction for bus in the region 4 DRAFT: For discussion purposes This paper is a thought piece; it is intended to serve as a starting point for discussion and a means to frame the ensuing debate 1. Present a The strategic considerations in this paper are not an set of strategic exhaustive list of all decisions to be made during this considerations process; they are a set of high-level choices for the Bus Transformation Project to consider at this phase of for regional strategy development bus transformation Decisions on each of these considerations will require trade-offs to be continually assessed throughout this effort 5 DRAFT: For discussion purposes Each strategic consideration in the paper is 2.
    [Show full text]
  • ROUTES LINE NAME Sunday Supplemental Service Note 1A,B Wilson Blvd-Vienna Sunday 1C Fair Oaks-Fairfax Blvd Sunday 2A Washington
    Sunday Supplemental ROUTES LINE NAME Note Service 1A,B Wilson Blvd-Vienna Sunday 1C Fair Oaks-Fairfax Blvd Sunday 2A Washington Blvd-Dunn Loring Sunday 2B Fair Oaks-Jermantown Rd Sunday 3A Annandale Rd Sunday 3T Pimmit Hills No Service 3Y Lee Highway-Farragut Square No Service 4A,B Pershing Drive-Arlington Boulevard Sunday 5A DC-Dulles Sunday 7A,F,Y Lincolnia-North Fairlington Sunday 7C,P Park Center-Pentagon No Service 7M Mark Center-Pentagon Weekday 7W Lincolnia-Pentagon No Service 8S,W,Z Foxchase-Seminary Valley No Service 10A,E,N Alexandria-Pentagon Sunday 10B Hunting Point-Ballston Sunday 11Y Mt Vernon Express No Service 15K Chain Bridge Road No Service 16A,C,E Columbia Pike Sunday 16G,H Columbia Pike-Pentagon City Sunday 16L Annandale-Skyline City-Pentagon No Service 16Y Columbia Pike-Farragut Square No Service 17B,M Kings Park No Service 17G,H,K,L Kings Park Express Saturday Supplemental 17G only 18G,H,J Orange Hunt No Service 18P Burke Centre Weekday 21A,D Landmark-Bren Mar Pk-Pentagon No Service 22A,C,F Barcroft-South Fairlington Sunday 23A,B,T McLean-Crystal City Sunday 25B Landmark-Ballston Sunday 26A Annandale-East Falls Church No Service 28A Leesburg Pike Sunday 28F,G Skyline City No Service 29C,G Annandale No Service 29K,N Alexandria-Fairfax Sunday 29W Braeburn Dr-Pentagon Express No Service 30N,30S Friendship Hghts-Southeast Sunday 31,33 Wisconsin Avenue Sunday 32,34,36 Pennsylvania Avenue Sunday 37 Wisconsin Avenue Limited No Service 38B Ballston-Farragut Square Sunday 39 Pennsylvania Avenue Limited No Service 42,43 Mount
    [Show full text]
  • Anacostia RI Work Plan
    Comment Form Remedial Investigation Work Plan, Anacostia River Sediment Project, Washington DC Commenter/ Section/Table/Figur Page Number Representative Organization Type e Nos. No. Comment Response The discussion of Sources does not seem to treat the re-suspension of in situ legacy sediments as a source of the toxics under The re-suspension and re-deposition of sediments is expected to occur during storm inv estigation. It may well be that a major source of the toxic sediments in any one place is depostion of these resuspended toxic ev ents and is a secondary source of sediment contaminants. The relativ e Anacostia materials af ter they hav e been stirred up by storms , dredging or other ev ents. While the extent of this source and the nature in which it signif icance of this process is dif f icult to quantif y and would v ary f rom storm to Watershed Citizens 1 William Matuszeski Env ironmental Group 3.1.2 24 deliv ers these toxics is dif f icult to determine, it is important to establish its relativ e contribution as a source. storm. Although the concentration distribution in sediments is expected to change in Adv isory response to these processes ov er time, the sampling approach presented in the RI Committee Work Plan will prov ide the data needed to support an ef f ectiv e f easibility study . The discussion of Ongoing Activ ites should include a detailed discussion of the current ef f ort by EPA and DCDOE to develop a new Total DDOE is engaged in an ef f ort to characterize the tributary mass loadings of the key Maximum Daily Load f or toxics in the Anacostia.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget
    Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Serving the National Capital Region Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Serving the National Capital Region Table of Contents Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Approved Fiscal 2008 Annual Budget Serving the National Capital Region Table of Contents Table of Contents General Manager’s Letter......................................................................................3 Chapter 1. Introduction to Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority...............................................................................5 Metro Profile ...............................................................................................5 Metro’s Strategic Plan ................................................................................6 Metro Board of Directors and Agency Oversight ........................................7 Organization Chart .....................................................................................9 How to Contact Metro...............................................................................10 Chapter 2. Budget Summary..............................................................................13 Operating Budget .....................................................................................16 Capital Budget..........................................................................................17 Reimbursable Projects .............................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • DCPLUG ANC 3E Brief 4.11.19 FINAL
    District of Columbia Power Line Undergrounding (DC PLUG) Initiative Presented to: ANC 3E Presented by: Anthony Soriano and Laisha Dougherty April 11, 2019 www.dcpluginfo.com Agenda • Background and History • Biennial Plan Feeder Locations • Feeder 308 Proposed Scope of Work • Customer Outreach • Contact Us 2 Background Background & Timeline Budget Aug 2012 Pepco Portion DC PLUG will provide resiliency The Mayor’s Power Line Undergrounding against major storms and improve the Task Force establishment $250 Million reliability of the electric system May 2013 * Recovered through Pepco The Task Force recommended Pepco and Underground Project Charge DDOTs partnership May 2014 District Portion The Electric Company Infrastructure $187.5 Million Improvement Financing Act became law Multi–year program to underground May 2017 * Recovered through Underground Rider up to 30 of the most vulnerable Council of the District of Columbia overhead distribution lines, spanning amended the law DDOT over 6-8 years with work beginning in July 2017 mid 2019 Pepco and DDOT filed a joint Biennial Plan up to $62.5 Million Nov 2017 DDOT Capital Improvement Funding Received Approval from D.C. Public Service Commission on the First Biennial Plan 3 Biennial Plan • In accordance with the Act, Pepco and DDOT filed a joint Biennial Plan on July 3, 2017 covering the two-year period, 2017-2019. The next Biennial Plan is planned to be filed September 2019. • Under the Biennial Plan, DDOT primarily will construct the underground facilities, and Pepco primarily will install
    [Show full text]
  • Remedial Investigation Report (Draft)
    Prepared for: Prepared by: Pepco and Pepco Energy Services AECOM Washington, D.C. Beltsville, Maryland February 2016 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (DRAFT) Benning Road Facility 3400 Benning Road, NE Washington, DC 20019 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (DRAFT) Benning Road Facility 3400 Benning Road, N.E. Washington, DC 20019 PREPARED FOR: Pepco and Pepco Energy Services 701 9th Street, NW Washington, DC 20068 PREPARED BY: AECOM 8000 Virginia Manor Road, Suite 110 Beltsville, MD 20705 February 2016 AECOM Project Team ________________________________ ________________________________ Robert Kennedy Betsy Ruffle Data Management and Forensics Lead Human Health Risk Assessment Lead ________________________________ ________________________________ Maryann Welsch Helen Jones Ecological Risk Assessment Lead Background Data Evaluation Lead ________________________________ ________________________________ Ben Daniels John Bleiler Field Operations Lead and Report Compiler Senior Technical Reviewer ________________________________ Ravi Damera, P.E., BCEE Project Manager ES-1 Executive Summary This draft Remedial Investigation Report presents the results of recently completed environmental investigation activities at Pepco’s Benning Road facility (the Site), located at 3400 Benning Road NE, Washington, DC. The Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Study Area consists of a “Landside” component focused on the Site itself, and a “Waterside” component focused on the shoreline and sediments in the segment of the Anacostia River adjacent to
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, Dc International Business Guide
    WASHINGTON, DC INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS GUIDE Contents 1 Welcome Letter — Mayor Muriel Bowser 3 Introduction 5 Why Washington, DC? 6 A Powerful Economy Infographic 8 Awards and Recognition 9 Washington, DC — Demographics 11 Washington, DC — Economy 12 Federal Government 12 Retail and Federal Contractors Real Estate and Construction 13 12 Professional and Business Services 13 Higher Education and Healthcare 12 Technology and Innovation 13 Creative Economy 12 Hospitality and Tourism 15 Washington, DC — An Obvious Choice For International Companies 16 The District — Map 19 Washington, DC — Wards 25 Establishing A Business in Washington, DC 25 Business Registration 27 Office Space 27 Permits And Licenses 27 Business And Professional Services 27 Finding Talent 27 Small Business Services 27 Taxes 27 Employment-related Visas 29 Business Resources 31 Business Incentives and Assistance 32 DC Government by the Letter / Acknowledgements D C C H A M B E R O F C O M M E R C E Dear Investor, Washington, DC, is a thriving, global marketplace. Over the past decade, we have experienced significant growth and transformation. The District of Columbia has one of the most educated workforces in the country, stable economic growth, an established research community, and a business-friendly government. I am proud to present you with the Washington, DC International Business Guide. This book contains relevant information for foreign firms interested in establishing a presence in our nation’s capital. In these pages, you will find background on our strongest business sectors, economic indicators, and foreign direct investment trends. In addition, there are a number of suggested steps as you consider bringing your business to DC.
    [Show full text]
  • AFFORDABLE and SUBSIDIZED HOUSING RESOURCE GUIDE (DC Metropolitan Area)
    AFFORDABLE AND SUBSIDIZED HOUSING RESOURCE GUIDE (DC Metropolitan Area) The District of Columbia Housing Authority has developed this housing resource list for the Washington DC region. It includes affordable and subsidized housing. Most of these buildings and organizations have their own waiting lists. Please contact them directly for updated information on housing availability. These lists were compiled from websites and public documents, and DCHA cannot ensure accuracy of listings. CONTACT PROPERTY PRIVATELY MANAGED PROPERTIES EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 1330 7TH STREET APARTMENTS Phone: 202-387-7558 1330 7TH ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001-3565 Phone: 202-387-7558 WEIL ENTERPRISES 54TH STREET HOUSING Phone: 919-734-1111 431 54th Street, SE [email protected] Washington, DC 20019 EQUITY MANAGEMENT II, LLC ALLEN HOUSE 3760 MINN AVE NE WASHINGTON, DC 20019-2600 Phone: 202-397-1862 FIRST PRIORITY MANAGEMENT ANCHOR HOUSING Phone: 202-635-5900 1609 LAWRENCE ST NE WASHINGTON, DC 20018-3802 Phone: (202) 635-5969 EDGEWOOD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ASBURY DWELLINGS Phone: (202) 745-7334 1616 MARION ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001-3468 Phone: (202)745-7434 WINN MANAGED PROPERTIES, LLC ATLANTIC GARDENS Phone: 202-561-8600 4216 4TH ST SE WASHINGTON, DC 20032-3325 Phone: 202-561-8600 WINN MANAGED PROPERTIES, LLC ATLANTIC TERRACE Phone: 202-561-8600 4319 19th ST S.E. WASHINGTON, DC 20032-3203 Updated 07/2013 1 of 17 AFFORDABLE AND SUBSIDIZED HOUSING RESOURCE GUIDE (DC Metropolitan Area) CONTACT PROPERTY Phone: 202-561-8600 HORNING BROTHERS AZEEZE BATES (Central
    [Show full text]
  • ANC 7E Submission
    Government of the District of Columbia ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 7E Marshall Heights ▪ Benning Ridge ▪ Capitol View ▪ Fort Davis 3939 Benning Rd. NE 7E01 – Veda Rasheed Washington, D.C. 20019 7E02 – Linda S. Green, Vice-Chair [email protected] 7E03 – Ebbon Allen www.anc7e.us 7E04 – Takiyah “TN” Tate Twitter: @ANC7E 7E05 – Victor Horton, 7E06 – Delia Houseal, Chair 7E07 – Yolanda Fields, Secretary/Treasurer Executive Assistant, Jemila James RESOLUTION #: 7E-20-002 Recommendations on the DC Comprehensive Plan January 14, 2020 WHEREAS, Advisory Neighborhood Commissions (ANCs) were created to “advise the Council of the District of Columbia, the Mayor, and each executive agency with respect to all proposed matters of District government policy,” including education; WHEREAS, the government of the District of Columbia by law is required to give “great weight” to comments from ANCs; WHEREAS, the Bowser Administration is committed to ensuring the public’s voices and views are reflected in the update of the Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) 7E has conducted several public engagement activities to gather feedback from residents; THEREFORE BEFORE IT RESOLVED: The Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC) 7E puts forward the following recommendations: FAR SOUTHEAST/NORTHEAST ELEMENT Recommendations After careful review and consideration, ANC7E Recommends that language be added to the Far Northeast/Southeast Element to address the following issues: 1702. Land Use 1702.4. We recommend the following text updates: Commercial uses are clustered in nodes along Minnesota Avenue, East Capitol Street, Naylor Road, Pennsylvania Avenue, Nannie Helen Burroughs Avenue, Division Avenue, Central Avenue SE, H Street SE, and Benning Road (NE and SE).
    [Show full text]
  • Final PMOC Safetrackreport (June2017)
    Monthly Report SafeTrack Program Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) June 2017 Progress Surge 15 – Building forms for new grout pads between Cheverly and Landover Stations October 25, 2017 PMOC Contract Number: DTFT60-14-D-00011 Task Order Number: 006, Project Number: DC-27-5272, Work Order No. 02 OPs Referenced: 01, 25 Hill International, Inc. One Commerce Square 2005 Market Street, 17th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103 PMOC Lead: Michael E. Radbill, P.E. (215) 309-7926 [email protected] Length of Time PMOC Assigned to Project under current Contract: 3 years, 5 months Length of Time PMOC Lead Assigned to Project: 5 years, 6 months TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 1 A. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 2 B. PROGRAM STATUS ....................................................................................................... 2 C. CORE ACCOUNTABILITY INFORMATION ....................................................................... 3 D. MAJOR PROBLEMS/ISSUES ........................................................................................... 4 MAIN REPORT ....................................................................................................................... 7 1. PROGRAM STATUS ........................................................................................................... 7 2. PROGRAM COST ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Anniversary Invitation List
    DC PSC - CENTENNIAL ANNIVERSARY INVITATION LIST Last Name First Name Affiliation PSC Employees - Current 1 Kane Betty Ann Chairman 2 Fort Joanne Doddy Commissioner 3 Ahern Veronica Office of General Counsel (OGC) 4 Anderson Benita Office of Human Resources (OHR) - Chief 5 Antonio Noel OGC 6 Armstead Kellie Office of Consumer Services (OCS) 7Aylor Aaron OCS 8 Bagayoko Ahmadou Office of Technical & Regulatory Analysis (OTRA) 9 Benati Jason OTRA 10 Berry Craig OGC 11 Beverly Richard General Counsel 12 Bowman Dr. Phylicia Fauntleroy Executive Director 13 Briggs Marvin Office of Commission Secretary (OCMS) 14 Brown, II James OGC 15 Clay, Jr. Jesse Office of Deputy Executive Director for Administrative Matters (ODEDAM) - Director 16 Cleverdon Daniel Office of the Chairman 17 Daves Aminta Office of Executive Director (OED) 18 Davis Carmen OCMS 19 Doe Hazel OCMS 20 Doherty Brian OTRA 21 Durham Stacey OCMS 22 Ford Kenneth OCS 23 Frazier Tiffany OGC 24 Fujihara Dr. Roger OTRA 25 Glick Kenneth OGC 26 Hale LaWanda OCS 27 Harris Alphonzo OCMS 28 Herskovitz Richard OGC 29 Hinton Cary Office of the Chairman 30 Howley John OTRA 31 Hu Dr. Grace OTRA 32 Hughes Kenneth OGC 33 Jackson Donald OTRA 34 Jordan Linda OCS - Director 35 Lee Angela Office of Commissioner 36 Lincoln-Stewart Kim OGC 37 Lipscombe Christopher OGC 38 Martinez Paul ODEDAM 39 Moskowitz Margaret OCS 40 Newkirk Wendy Office of the Chairman 41 Nurse Karen OCS 42 Nwude Dr. Joseph OTRA - Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory Matters 43 Ogbue Udeozo OTRA 44 Ongweso Dr. Edward OTRA 45 Otiji
    [Show full text]