DOCSLIB.ORG

Anacostia RI Work Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anacostia RI Work Plan Comment Form Remedial Investigation Work Plan, Anacostia River Sediment Project, Washington DC Commenter/ Section/Table/Figur Page Number Representative Organization Type e Nos. No. Comment Response The discussion of Sources does not seem to treat the re-suspension of in situ legacy sediments as a source of the toxics under The re-suspension and re-deposition of sediments is expected to occur during storm inv estigation. It may well be that a major source of the toxic sediments in any one place is depostion of these resuspended toxic ev ents and is a secondary source of sediment contaminants. The relativ e Anacostia materials af ter they hav e been stirred up by storms , dredging or other ev ents. While the extent of this source and the nature in which it signif icance of this process is dif f icult to quantif y and would v ary f rom storm to Watershed Citizens 1 William Matuszeski Env ironmental Group 3.1.2 24 deliv ers these toxics is dif f icult to determine, it is important to establish its relativ e contribution as a source. storm. Although the concentration distribution in sediments is expected to change in Adv isory response to these processes ov er time, the sampling approach presented in the RI Committee Work Plan will prov ide the data needed to support an ef f ectiv e f easibility study . The discussion of Ongoing Activ ites should include a detailed discussion of the current ef f ort by EPA and DCDOE to develop a new Total DDOE is engaged in an ef f ort to characterize the tributary mass loadings of the key Maximum Daily Load f or toxics in the Anacostia. Some of the monitoring and inv estigativ e ef f orts being carried out as part of the TMDL contaminants that are present in the riv er sediments. Giv en the complexities dev elopment could be usef ul to the RI and the FS. Furthermore, the TMDL should be identif y ing sources of the toxics and the inv olv ed, that ef f ort will be conducted independent of the RI and will consider resuspension of existing sediments bearing toxics may be a pathway . Ultimately , the Wasteload Allocation dev eloped under the TMDL prev ious and ongoing EPA ef f orts to dev elop new TMDLs f or the Anacostia Riv er. should be integrated with the remediation plan resulting f rom this RI/FS, and the desire and commitment to do that should be included here. DDOE believ es that sediment sampling results can help def ine goals f or the TMDL Anacostia program, which is separate and distinct f rom the RI. An appropriate role f or the RI is, Watershed Citizens 2 William Matuszeski Env ironmental Group 2.6 10 theref ore, to make appropriate recommendations regarding TMDL monitoring priorities. Adv isory Since any such recommendations must await the perf ormance of f ield sampling f or Committee the RI and associated analy sis and reporting, the RI report is the appropriate v enue f or indicating any such recommendations. No changes will, theref ore, be made in response to this comment. Anacostia While the dominant transport medium may be downstream migration, as stated in 3.1.5, it is important to understand the extent to which Comment acknowledged. As noted in the response to Comment #1. the sampling Watershed Citizens the tidal Anacostia transport sy stem f or sediment is chronic v ersus ev ent-driv en. A sy stem that is storm-ev ent driv en will obtain a larger approach presented in the RI Work Plan will prov ide the data needed to support an 3 William Matuszeski Env ironmental Group 3.1.5 and 3.1.6 31-32 Adv isory share of its loadings f rom the disturbance of insitu sediments and f rom bank erosion. In contrast, if the movement is ongoing and not ef f ectiv e f easibility study . Committee particularly variable with storm events, it may be easier to evaluate the rates and lev els of material transport. The monitoring being done Theb EPAdiscussion f th of TMDL Sources f suggests l that idthere may well h lf continue i h i to be ttoxic loadings f f i t tentering the thsy stem i bilitf rom upstream b t th t tributar llies, b t As noted in the response to Comment #2, DDOE is engaged in an ef f ort separate including the Northeast and Northwest Branches and Lower Beav erdam Creek. Since these are all in Mary land, it is important to indicate in f rom the RI to characterize the tributary mass loadings of key tributaries including Anacostia the Workplan how and how soon DOE will be engaging coiunty and state of f icials to assure timely consideration of data needs and Northeast Branch, Northwest Branch, and Lower Beav erdam Creek. Section 3.1.2.2 Watershed Citizens 4 William Matuszeski Env ironmental Group 3.1.2 24 ultimately remedies. will be rev ised to indicate that DDOE is in the process of exploring with the Mary land Adv isory Department of the Env ironment and other gov ernmental entities strategies f or Committee ev aluating the loadings of contaminants to the Anacostia Riv er v ia tributary inf lows. It is essential that the schedlule f or the RI /FS be rev ised to ref lect the delay s caused by non-prof essional rev iews within the DC DDOE is taking and will take all reasonably necessary steps to ensure ef f icient Gov ernment. Once that is done, the new schedule should include no time f or such unnecessary rev iews in the f uture and should set out administration of rev iews associated with the Anacostia Riv er sediment project. an achiev able set of dates. Ef f orts should be made to warn potential permit authorities of the anticipated need f or permits as well as the Additionally , DDOE and Tetra Tech are f requently in contact with all permitting importance of ef f icient handling of permit applications. In the past this has been a problem, especially with the National Park Service. authorities to ensure permit approv als are as expedited as possible. Anacostia Watershed Citizens 5 William Matuszeski Env ironmental Group 10 95 Adv isory Committee The Objectiv es are not well-aligned with the purpose of the study as outlined in the DDOE scope of work which is as f ollows: "The purpose Section 1.1 will be rev ised to discuss the alignment of Work Plan objectiv es with the of this statement of work (SOW) is to identif y the existing sources of sediment contamination in the Anacostia Riv er, to ev aluate the objectiv es indicated in the Statement of Work (SOW). The discussion will note the Chesapeake Bay 6 Beth McGee Env ironmental Group Section 1.1 Objectiv es 1 nature and extent of contamination in the sediments in the tidal portion of the Anacostia Riv er and conduct f easibility study to dev elop and SOW objectiv es that are explicitly addressed in the RI v ersus the SOW objectiv es Foundation ev aluate potential remedial actions to eliminate unacceptable risk to human health and the env ironment. " and includes dev eloping that will be addressed in companion ef f orts. monitoring plans f or outf allls and other sources. There is no mention of monitoring in the workplan. The statement that prev ious sampling in the Anacostia Riv er was concentrated near env ironmental areas of concern along the banks of the The ref erenced text indicating that Anacostia sediment inv estigations hav e been Chesapeake Bay riv er is not true. The ANS study and McGee et al 2009 were designed to be representatiav e of riv er conditions. env ironmental areas of limited to the responsible party (RP) sites will be rev ised to state that while most 7 Beth McGee Env ironmental Group Section 4.1 and Table 4.7 and 3 Foundation concern along the banks of the riv er is not true. studies hav e f ocused on the RP sites, sev eral studies hav e ev aluated conditions throughout the tidal riv er. The proposed approach includes sampling porewater, subsurf ace sediments and surf ace water. The rationale f or these analy ses is not Pore water will be collected as a parameter to support the ecological ev aluation of supported. shallow sediment conditions and to prov ide parameters required f or f easibility study . Chesapeake Bay 8 Beth McGee Env ironmental Group Table 4.1. Step 3 39 In addition, the data will support initial screening f or potential zones of groundwater Foundation impact to shallow sediment. Table 4.1 and associated text will be rev ised accordingly . As noted abov e, we don't not think subsurf ace sediment sampling is justif ied broadly in the riv er. There will be v aluable inf ormation f rom The text will be rev ised as noted abov e to expand on the discussion of the rationale site specif ic studies that might help determine where additonal subsurf ace samples should be collected, to tie sources with contamination, f or the collection of deep sediment and pore water samples. As noted abov e, pore but a broad scale assessment is not justif ied and would not be a good use of limited dollars. Porewater is proposed as an indicator of water is essential f or ev aluating benthic env ironmental conditions and f or prov iding Chesapeake Bay exposure f or benthic animals.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Remedial Investigation Report (Draft)
    Prepared for: Prepared by: Pepco and Pepco Energy Services AECOM Washington, D.C. Beltsville, Maryland February 2016 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (DRAFT) Benning Road Facility 3400 Benning Road, NE Washington, DC 20019 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT (DRAFT) Benning Road Facility 3400 Benning Road, N.E. Washington, DC 20019 PREPARED FOR: Pepco and Pepco Energy Services 701 9th Street, NW Washington, DC 20068 PREPARED BY: AECOM 8000 Virginia Manor Road, Suite 110 Beltsville, MD 20705 February 2016 AECOM Project Team ________________________________ ________________________________ Robert Kennedy Betsy Ruffle Data Management and Forensics Lead Human Health Risk Assessment Lead ________________________________ ________________________________ Maryann Welsch Helen Jones Ecological Risk Assessment Lead Background Data Evaluation Lead ________________________________ ________________________________ Ben Daniels John Bleiler Field Operations Lead and Report Compiler Senior Technical Reviewer ________________________________ Ravi Damera, P.E., BCEE Project Manager ES-1 Executive Summary This draft Remedial Investigation Report presents the results of recently completed environmental investigation activities at Pepco’s Benning Road facility (the Site), located at 3400 Benning Road NE, Washington, DC. The Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Study Area consists of a “Landside” component focused on the Site itself, and a “Waterside” component focused on the shoreline and sediments in the segment of the Anacostia River adjacent to
    [Show full text]
  • Public Access Points Within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill
    Public Access Points within 50 Miles of Capitol Hill Public Access Point Boat Ramp Fishing Swimming Restrooms Hiking/Trekking Location 2900 Virginia Ave NW, Thompson's Boat Center X X X X Washington, DC 20037 3244 K St NW, Washington, DC Georgetown Waterfront Park X X 20007 George Washington Memorial Theodore Roosevelt Island X X X Pkwy N, Arlington, VA 22209 West Basin Dr SW, Washington, West Potomac Park X X DC 20024 Capital Crescent Trail, Washington Canoe Club X Washington, DC 20007 600 Water St SW, Washington, DC Ganglplank Marina X X X X 20024 George Washington Memorial Columbia Island Marina X X X Parkway, Arlington, VA 22202 99 Potomac Ave. SE. Washington, Diamond Teague Park X X DC 20003 335 Water Street Washington, DC The Yards Park X 20003 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE, Anacostia Boat House X Washington, DC 20003 700-1000 Water St SW, Washington Marina X X X X Washington, DC 20024 Anacostia Park, Section E Anacostia Marina X X X Washington, DC 20003 2001-2099 1st St SW, Washington, Buzzard's Point Marina X X X DC 20003 2038-2068 2nd St SW, James Creek Marina X X X Washington, DC 20593 Anacostia Dr, Washington, DC Anacostia Park X X X 20019 Heritage Island Trail, Washington, Heritage Island X DC 20002 Kingman Island Trail, Washington, Kingman Island X DC 20002 Mt Vernon Trail, Arlington, VA Gravelly Point X X 22202 George Washington Memorial Roaches Run X X X X Pkwy, Arlington, VA 22202 1550 Anacostia Ave NE, Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens/Park X X X Washington, DC 20019 Capital Crescent Trail, Jack's Boat House X X Washington, DC 20007 Daingerfield Island X X X X 1 Marina Dr, Alexandria, VA 22314 67-101 Dale St, Alexandria, VA Four Mile Run Park/Trail X X X 22305 4601 Annapolis Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • The River - Welcome
    Placeholder Image Return to the River - Welcome N Annual Meeting Luncheon & State of the Capitol Riverfront a Thursday, January 17, 2019 m e D a t e Capitol Riverfront “Dashboard” • 500 acres • 37.5M square feet • 65% built-out • 34,000 employees • 9,500 residents • 7 subareas • 2 grocery stores • 2 sports stadiums • 13 acres of parks Why We Are Here… River Connections “Eventually everything connects – people, places, objects. The quality of the connections is the key to quality per se.” Charles Eames “Take me to the river, drop me in the waters…washing me down” Talking Heads We are all Connected… Physically Spiritually Generationally By Place By Social Media By Events And Rivers Connect Us… Anacostia Destinations Arboretum Tidal Basin/ Langston Golf Hains Point Kingman Island Yards Park Kenilworth RFK Stadium Aquatic Gardens Washington Channel Poplar Point Anacostia Park Anacostia Destinations Rivers Have Sustained Us… Early Settlements Shipping/Commerce Manufacturing Agriculture Hydro-Electricity Water Supplies Recreation But We Have Not Always Been Kind… Inspiration 2003 Anacostia Waterfront Initiative Framework Plan “You can’t be unhappy in the middle of a big, beautiful river.” Jim Harrison Framework Plan Themes 15 Years of Implementation “A Plan Is Not Great Unless It Is Put Into Action.” Connections Clean the River Public Parks Community Events Boating Communities Infrastructure Recreation Fields s n o i t c e n n o C s n o i t c e n n o C Partners in the Effort Anacostia River Corridor Anacostia River & Parklands • 8.5 mile river corridor connects 1,800 acres of public parks • Connects to amenities such as: Washington Channel, Hains Point, Yards Park, Anacostia Park, Kingman & Heritage Islands, National Arboretum & Kenilworth Gardens, Nats Park, Audi Field, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2021 Committee Budget Report
    FISCAL YEAR 2021 COMMITTEE BUDGET REPORT TO: Members of the Council of the District of Columbia FROM: Councilmember Mary M. Cheh Chairperson, Committee on Transportation & the Environment DATE: June 25, 2020 SUBJECT: DRAFT Report and recommendations of the Committee on Transportation & the Environment on the Fiscal Year 2021 budget for agencies under its purview The Committee on Transportation & the Environment (“Committee”), having conducted hearings and received testimony on the Mayor’s proposed operating and capital budgets for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2021 for the agencies under its jurisdiction, reports its recommendations for review and consideration by the Committee of the Whole. The Committee also comments on several sections in the Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Support Act of 2020, as proposed by the Mayor, and proposes several of its own subtitles. Table of Contents Summary ........................................................................................... 3 A. Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 3 B. Operating Budget Summary Table .................................................................................................. 7 C. Full-Time Equivalent Summary Table ............................................................................................. 9 D. Operating & Capital Budget Ledgers ........................................................................................... 11 E. Committee Transfers ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Area Scroll (PDF)
    What will the street look like at this location? Sidewalk Buffer and Travel Lane Travel 11'–12' Lane Travel 4'–8' 11' 1) (Track Travel Lane Travel 10' Median 11' (Track 2) (Track What choices are available for 18'–19' Lane Travel 11' Lane Travel the configuration of the stops? WESTBOUND 10' Travel Lane Travel Grass 11' 4' Track Cycle Buffer 8' IMPROVED BICYCLE/ EASTBOUND Sidewalk 0-2' PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 6' Benning Road Kingman Island Car Barn Training Bridge over Center (CBTC) Kingman Lake – PEPCO Rehabilitation KINGMAN ISLAND 36TH ST 26TH ST LANGSTON GOLF ANACOSTIA AVE 34TH ST COURSE EADS ST ANACOSTIA RIVER RIVER TERRACE Ethel Kennedy OKLAHOMA AVE Bridge – Rehabilitation Kingman Island Locator Map Provides shared-use path, sidewalk, and buffers Allows left turns into Driving Range Travel lane with streetcar tracks Streetcar platform What will the street look like at this location? Grass Sidewalk Travel Lane Travel 6' Lane Travel 4' (Track 1) (Track PARKSIDE Sidewalk What choices are available for 11' Lane Travel 10' Median 11' Lane Travel 7' (Track 1) (Track Travel Lane Travel (Track 2) (Track VARIES Lane Travel 12' the configuration of the stops? Median 12' Lane Turn 11' Lane Travel 5' (Track 2) (Track 10' Lane Travel 11' Lane Travel Grass WESTBOUND 11' 12' WESTBOUND Lane Travel 4' Track Cycle IMPROVED BICYCLE/ Buffer Shared 12' Use Path 8' Sidewalk PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES 0-2' EASTBOUND 10' 6' EASTBOUND Anacostia Avenue to East of 36th Street NE 34th Street NE FORT MAHAN PEPCO 39TH ST PARK MINNESOTA AVE MINNESOTA KINGMAN ISLAND 41ST ST 36TH ST 40TH ST 40TH 42ND ST ANACOSTIA AVE 34TH ST 295 EADS ST ANACOSTIA RIVER Lorraine H.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingman Island Project
    VISITOR STATION, OUTDOOR CLASSROOMS, & TRAILS RIVER TERRACE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION MEETING February 27, 2019 AGENDA 1 Project history 2 Where we left off 3 What DOEE has done since 4 SOW components 5 Contract community engagement timeline 6 Project timeline 7 Interim projects 8 Questions? TAG THIS PRESENTATION: @DOEE_DC PROJECT HISTORY • Kingman & Heritage Island Feasibility Study Act 2016 – Released July 2017 • Hickok Cole and DOEE present plan to RTCO – September 2017 • Mayor Bowser Announces $4.7 Million Investment in Kingman and Heritage Islands – January 12, 2018 • Kingman Island Community Advisory Group (Kingman CAG) First Meeting – July 2018 • DOEE Meets with River Terrace Community at Anacostia Park – August 2018 TAG THIS PRESENTATION: @DOEE_DC DOEE & RIVER TERRACE AT ANACOSTIA PARK Issues Discussed: • Kingman Island Benning Road Access (pedestrian entrance upgrade, wider gate, visible signage, etc.) • East Capital Street sidewalk needs upkeep • Benning Road sidewalk on west side needs repair • Programming on the Islands for the local community • Coordination with local schools for environmental education programming @DOEE_DC WHAT DOEE HAS DONE SINCE 1. Research visits to other parks for relevant features 2. Drafting the SOW a) Kingman and Heritage Island Feasibility Study as basis b) DOEE expertise consulted includes: wildlife management, green building, energy, toxic substances, building permit plan review, stormwater management c) Sister Agencies: DGS, DPR, OCTO, DDOT 3. Market Research 4. Interim Projects 5. Seeking Additional Funding 6. 2nd meeting with Kingman Advisory Group (2/5/19) @DOEE_DC SUMMARY OF PROPOSED PROJECT GOALS & FEATURES A flagship project showcasing state-of-the-art Design a Visitor Center at the Benning sustainability goals for the District of Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • National Capital Planning Commission Ncpc Annual
    2oo5 NCPC ANNUAL REPORT NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING COMMISSION NCPC’S LEGISLATIVE MANDATE The U.S. Congress gave NCPC a broad legislative authority over a range of issues affecting everything from the city’s major monuments and historic treasures to its zoning maps and regulations. Congress established the agency in 1924 as the National Capital Park Commission. In 1952 Congress passed the National Capital Planning Act, renaming the agency and designating it as the cen- tral planning agency for the federal and District government in the National Capital Region (NCR). The Act, amended after D.C. Home Rule and the creation of the District Office of Planning, charges NCPC to provide overall planning guidance for federal land and buildings in the NCR. The Zoning Act of 1938 mandates that NCPC serve on the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment. The Board hears many cases that involve land adjacent to or affected by federal landholdings. Through the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, NCPC serves as a steward of the region’s historic buildings, districts, landscapes, and views. The Commission also operates under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires feder- al agencies to evaluate the environmental impacts of proposed projects. The 1968 International Center Act established a campus for foreign chanceries in Northwest Washington. Development plans for all chanceries in the 47-acre International Center are subject to NCPC’s approval. The Foreign Missions Act of 1982 establishes the criteria and procedures by which foreign mis- sions may locate in the District of Columbia. Under the law, NCPC’s executive director must serve as a member of the Foreign Missions Board of Zoning Adjustment, which considers applications by foreign missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Application
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Regist er Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Kingman Park Historic District________________________________ Other names/site number: ______________________________________ Name of related multip le property listing: Spingarn, Browne, Young, Phelps Educational Campus; Spingarn High School; Langston Golf Course and Langston Dwellings ______________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: Western Boundary Line is 200-800 Blk 19th Street NE; Eastern Boundary Line is the Anacostia River along Oklahoma Avenue NE; Northern Boundary Line is 19th- 22nd Street & Maryland Avenue NE; Southern Boundary Line is East Capitol Street at 19th- 22nd Street NE. City or town: Washington, DC__________ State: ____DC________ County: ____________ Not For Publicatio n: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • DC Citizen Science Water Quality Monitoring Report 2 0 2 0 Table of Contents Dear Friends of the River
    WAter DC Citizen Science Water Quality Monitoring Report 2 0 2 0 Table of Contents Dear Friends of the River, On behalf of Anacostia Riverkeeper, I am pleased to share with you our first Annual DC Citizen Science Volunteer Water Quality Report on Bacteria in District Waters. This report focuses on 2020 water quality results from all three District watersheds: the Anacostia River, Potomac River, and Rock Creek. The water quality data we collected is critical for understanding the health of the Anacostia River and District waters; as it serves as a gauge for safe recreation potential as well as a continuing assessment of efforts in the Methodology District of Columbia to improve the overall health of 7 our streams and waterways. As a volunteer program, we are dependent on those who offer time out of their daily schedule to work 8 Anacostia River with us and care for the water quality. With extreme gratitude, we would like to thank all our volunteers and staff for the dedication, professionalism, and enthusiasm to execute this program and to provide high quality data to the public. Additionally, support 10 Potomac River from our partner organizations was crucial to running this program, so we would like to extend an additional thanks to staff at Audubon Naturalist Society, Potomac Riverkeeper, and Rock Creek 12 Rock Creek Conservancy. We hope you find this annual report a good guide to learning more about our local DC waterways. We believe that clean water is a benefit everyone should experience, one that starts with consistent and 14 Discussion publicly available water quality data.
    [Show full text]
  • Anacostia-River-Trail-Webinar
    THE ANACOSTIA RIVER TRAIL (ART) What you will learn • Overview of the Anacostia River Trail (ART) • Accessing the ART via Metro and Bridges • Amenities/Facilities along the trail • Highlights of the Anacostia Neighborhood (which shares its name) Overview of the Anacostia River Trail About the ART? • The ART consists of Two Parts - The East Bank Trail and The West Bank Trail, which runs along both sides of the Anacostia River About the ART Cont • Connects Two National Parks - Anacostia Park and Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens • Offers Alternative Transportation Routes (About 16 Miles of Off-Street Trails that includes Protected Bike Lanes) • Access to Sports, Recreational, Educational, Art and Entertainment facilities as well as Restaurants and Shopping • DC Portion of the ART ends right after Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens at US-50 How the trail looks Sharrow & Protected Lanes Where Does the ART Go? • East Bank Trail (Starts at the base of Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge (at Anacostia Park) and goes to Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens) • West Bank Trail (Starts at National Park and goes to Kingman Island then meets the East Bank Trail at Benning Road in the River Terrace Neighborhood Different Types of Signage on the ART Directional Signs Loaded with Information • Tells you what Street/Bridge you are near • How near/far Metro & what lines • What neighborhood you are near/far and if there’s a bike route • How near/far the other trail is Art Work with Area Information Information Signs * Capital Bikeshare Map • CaBi Stations are located throughout the ART, and each Station has an Area Map loaded with information Bike Routes to Local Neighborhoods Accessing the ART • Walking/Biking/Jogging • Metro • Bridges Walking/Biking/Jogging • The ART goes though many neighborhoods allowing easy access by walking, biking or jogging.
    [Show full text]
  • Anacostia Great Outdoors Factsheet (PDF)
    Anacostia’s Great Outdoors: Fact Sheet Connecting People and the Anacostia removal of more than 20 acres of landfill. Additionally, the In partnership with the federal government, the District of project included: planting 85,000 wetland plants, reforesting Columbia and State of Maryland are working to restore the 14 acres of land, creating 20 acres of tidal wetland, and Anacostia River and provide safe and convenient means for preserving four acres of habitat along the Anacostia River. people to access the Anacostia River and enjoy the outdoors. Connecting DC and Maryland The Anacostia Riverwalk Trails will link together hundreds of Maryland, the District, and the U.S. Department of miles of regional trails; including the Fort Circle Trail (DC), the Transportation are working to design and build the critical Bladensburg Trail (MD), the Rock Creek Trail (DC and MD), the Kenilworth Gardens Section, which will connect the Maryland Mount Vernon Trail (VA) and the C&O Canal Trail (DC and and District Anacostia Riverwalk Trail Networks. Design is 65 MD). These connections will also provide access to the East percent complete and construction will begin in 2012. Coast Greenway, a network of trails linking Maine to Florida. Maryland is providing an additional $1 million from the Cycle Maryland Bikeways Program to build this critical connection. Anacostia Riverwalk Trail - DC With 12 miles already in place and a total of 20 miles planned, New Cycle Maryland Bicycle Funding Programs the Anacostia Riverwalk trail in Washington, DC will connect Today, Governor O’Malley announced two new bicycle sixteen waterfront neighborhoods to Anacostia Park and the funding programs to move forward his Cycle Maryland Anacostia River.
    [Show full text]
  • South Capitol Street Urban Design Study
    South Capitol Street Urban Design Study The National Capital Planning Commission The District of Columbia Office of Planning January 2003 2 South Capitol Street Urban Design Study The National Capital Planning Commission The District of Columbia Office of Planning Chan Krieger & Associates Architecture & Urban Design Economic Research Associates (ERA) Economic Development January 2003 South Capitol Street Urban Design Study 1 2 Dear Friends and Colleagues: Great city streets are the very measure of urbanity. They are the stage for city life, the place of public contact, and the intersection where com- mercial enterprise and civic aspiration combine. The Champs Elysees in Paris, Commonwealth Avenue in Boston, and Unter den Linden in Berlin all demonstrate how cohesive and dynamic streets define and animate the life of their cities. South Capitol Street can be such a place. This one-mile stretch from the U.S. Capitol to a magnificent waterfront terminus on the Anacostia River has all the potential to rival the great urban boulevards of the world. With bold vision and creative leadership, South Capitol can be reborn as a vibrant city street for Washington residents and as a National Capital destination for all Americans. We envision the Corridor as a bustling mix of shops, offices, hotels, apartments, civic art, and open space. Where the street meets the river could be the site of a major civic feature such as a museum or memorial and offer additional attractions such as restau- rants, concerts, marinas and waterfront entertainment. This South Capitol Street and Urban Design Study was a cooperative effort between the District’s Office of Planning and the National Capital Planning Commission.
    [Show full text]