DOCSLIB.ORG

AGENDA Page No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

E-mail: [email protected] Direct line: 01403 215465 SCRUTINY & OVERVIEW COMMITTEE SOUTHERN RAIL’S PERFORMANCE IN SEVERE WEATHER WORKING GROUP THURSDAY 16TH OCTOBER 2014 AT 2:00 P.M. COMMITTEE ROOM 2, PARK NORTH, NORTH STREET, HORSHAM Councillors: Roy Cornell (Chairman) Philip Circus Jim Sanson You are summoned to the meeting to transact the following business. Tom Crowley Chief Executive AGENDA Page No. 1. Apologies for absence 2. To approve as correct the record of the meeting held on 30th May 2013 1 3. To receive any declarations of interest 4. Announcements from the Chairman or the Chief Executive 5. To consider progress on the Working Group’s recommendations and to hear from Southern Rail and Network Rail representatives (i) Initial responses from Network Rail, Southern Rail and 5 West Sussex County Council (ii) Southern Rail Stakeholder Report 2013 7 (iii) Passenger Focus: Rail Passenger Satisfaction Survey: Spring 2014 8 (iv) Draft minutes of the West Sussex Rail Users Association AGM 14 st held on 31 May 2014 Horsham District Council, Park North, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1RL Tel: 01403 215100 (calls may be recorded) www.horsham.gov.uk Chief Executive - Tom Crowley (v) Southern Rail punctuality figures 2010-2014 19 (vi) Southern Rail: Improving Train Punctuality 21 (vii) Network Rail website information: performance by train operator; 23 the impact of severe weather; and Sussex Route Plan (viii) Press articles 33 (ix) Working Group’s Report (December 2012) - enclosed 47 Southern Rail’s Performance in Severe Weather Terms of Reference 1. To examine the problems which occur during icy or severe weather which causes the trains to fail 2. To consider what action Southern Rail and Network Rail have taken since last winter’s delays 3. To consider what safeguards are in place to deal with the disruption, especially at peak times, when trains do fail as a result of the severe weather 4. To identify Southern and Network Rail’s methods of communication to staff and passengers at times of disruption 5. To examine to what extent any action by HDC is appropriate Southern Rail’s Performance in Severe Weather Working Group 30th May 2013 Notes of the Scrutiny and Overview Committee Southern Rail’s Performance in Severe Weather Working Group 30th May 2013 Present: Councillors: Roy Cornell (Chairman) Philip Circus Jim Sanson Also present: Councillor George Cockman Simon Chapman, Route Enhancement Manager (Sussex), Network Rail Martin Grier, Head of Control and Performance, Southern Rail Trudie Mitchell, Chairman of Denne Neighbourhood Council Trevor Tupper, West Sussex Rail Users Association 1. TO APPROVE AS CORRECT THE RECORD OF THE MEETING HELD ON 31st OCTOBER 2012 The notes of the meeting held on 31st October 2012 were approved as a correct record. 2. TO RECEIVE ANY DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest. 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM THE CHAIRMAN OR CHIEF EXECUTIVE There were no announcements. 4. TO CONSIDER THE WORKING GROUP’S RECOMMENDATIONS AND TO HEAR FROM THE REPRESENTATIVES OF SOUTHERN RAIL AND NETWORK RAIL The Chairman welcomed attendees to the meeting and explained the background to the review, how Horsham District Council had no regulatory powers in this area but wished to know how the Working Group’s recommendations were being progressed to enable it to represent the interest of residents of the District and to keep them informed of developments. The Head of Control and Performance at Southern Rail acknowledged that performance during the severe weather in December 2010 had been poor. He tabled a document that outlined how improvements had been introduced and how Southern Rail’s plan for dealing with snow focussed on three key areas: preparedness, plan and delivery. 1 Southern Rail’s Performance in Severe Weather Working Group 30th May 2013 Station audits had been carried out and equipment to clear platforms had been purchased or updated, 4X4 vehicles were available to deliver equipment or to transport staff members, Southern Rail’s Winter Plan had been rewritten, agreement existed with Network Rail about contingency timetables, and there was a clear understanding of who had to do what and by when. The weather forecast reports provided to Southern Rail had, during the winter months of 2012/13, been highly accurate. Timely decisions had therefore been made if changes were required to rail services and that allowed information about a reduced or revised service to be provided to passengers in advance. The Class 313 trains that operated on routes along the south coast did not perform well in severe weather. Those trains were taken out of service during periods of extreme weather. Multiple Purpose Vehicles (MPVs) took preventative action before any snow and ice by laying heated fluid on the conductor rail. Data relating to a week in November / December 2010 was compared to that for a week in January 2013. It showed that 1509 out of a total 2100 train services had operated during that period in 2010. In 2013 there had been 1956 trains in operation out of a timetabled 2085. That represented a significant improvement in the provision of train services during severe weather although some of the services were subject to delay. The Public Performance Measure figures (which show the percentage of trains which arrived at their destination on time) indicated a 45.6% performance for Southern Rail in 2010 and a performance of 70.2% in 2013 for the sample weeks during periods of severe weather. That improvement in punctuality was achieved while running 93.8% of the normal train service over the sample week in 2013. The Working Group recognised the improvement in performance since 2010 of Southern Rail during spells of severe weather. The Working Group had emphasised that communication to passengers was a key issue. Members had previously noted that Southern Rail train drivers now possessed Blackberry communication and that Southern Rail was making more frequent announcements to passengers on board trains. Southern Rail and Network Rail accepted the importance of delivering service information to the public by various media and also at railway stations, and stated that improvements were being made. The Head of Control and Performance at Southern Rail explained how changes within the Control Centre would ensure that any train delays were identified early and investigated, consideration given to what actions were required, contact made with the relevant train conductor and information passed to station staff and displayed on the customer information screens where necessary. 2 Southern Rail’s Performance in Severe Weather Working Group 30th May 2013 Resignalling works along the Arun Valley were scheduled for late 2013 and would allow line speed improvements between Christ’s Hospital and Pulborough, and the addition of signalling sections between Billingshurst and Horsham would improve flexibility and performance. On a daily basis an average of 95% of the Southern Rail train fleet was available and in service. Trains received regular servicing but if there was a failure with a train(s) or more maintenance time was required, it could result in some services being cancelled or trains of short formation. Southern Rail was purchasing 140 new train coaches from Bombardier; the first of the coaches would soon be delivered. The life expectancy of current trains was estimated at between 40 and 50 years. The new control operations centre at Three Bridges had been constructed and was being fitted out. It was anticipated that it would be operational around August 2013. Network Rail’s Route Enhancement Manager agreed to forward an article written by the Director of the Network Rail Board which outlined changes to the rail industry, how it had matured and how it was managing the growth in passenger numbers with many more trains running to meet that demand. Members were informed that Southern Rail would soon be commencing the franchise renewal bid process; its current franchise would end in June 2015. The Working Group thanked the representatives and attendees for their comments and contributions. Members welcomed the improvements in the performance of Southern Rail during recent periods of severe weather and acknowledged Southern Rail’s continuing cooperation with Network Rail. Members noted the press articles and a local resident’s representations which highlighted specific disruption to rail services because of snow and ice in early 2013. The Working Group noted West Sussex County Council’s response to the recommendation that it include all access to railway stations on its list of priority routes for gritting. The County Council’s Winter Maintenance Service Plan included provision for the gritting of all A and B roads and roads of local importance including those main roads that pass most of the transport hubs. Its policy was to undertake precautionary salting of access roads to railway stations. The Working Group agreed to request the representatives of Southern Rail and Network Rail to continue to keep the Council informed on a regular basis of their actions to maintain services during times of severe weather. 3 Southern Rail’s Performance in Severe Weather Working Group 30th May 2013 A further meeting might be arranged in May 2014 to allow the Working Group to assess the ongoing improvements by Southern Rail and Network Rail. The meeting ended at 11.35 a.m. having started at 10.25 a.m. CHAIRMAN 4 Initial responses from Network Rail and Southern Rail and WSCC Email from Simon Chapman, Network Rail 23rd January 2013 Thank you. In respect of the first recommendation I can confirm Network Rail is happy to work with the Council to keep them informed and that we are happy to discuss how best this might be done. Regards Simon Email from Yvonne Leslie, Southern Rail 21st January 2013 Dear Raymond, Thank you for the final recommendations.
Recommended publications
  • Govia Thameslink Railway Limited 26Th Supplemental Agreement

    Govia Thameslink Railway Limited 26Th Supplemental Agreement

    26th SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT between NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED as Network Rail And GOVIA THAMESLINK RAILWAY LIMITED as Train Operator relating to the Track Access Contract (Passenger Services) dated 02 March 2016 380383 CONTENTS 1. INTERPRETATION ....... .. ..... ...... ............ ... ....................... .................. .................. ............ .. 3 2. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM ........ .... ........ ..... ....... .. ....................... ............... ... .. ............. 3 3. AMENDMENTS TO CONTRACT .... ............... ......... ..... ..... ......... .. ... ......... .... .. ...... ... ........... 4 4. GENERAL ..... .... ............ .. .. .. .... ... .. ... ...... ..... ................. ... ............ .. .. .. .... ... ... ..... ........ ....... .... 4 5. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS .... ... .................. .............................. .. ........... ...... ... ...... .. ...... .. .... .... 4 6. LAW ..................... ...... .. .. .. .. ....... .. ... ...... ..................... .... .................. .. .. ... ... ........... ..... ... .... .. 4 7. COUNTERPARTS .... .. .... ........... ..... ........ ............... ......... ... ...................................... ....... .... 4 8. ANNEXA .... ......... .. ........ ... ....... ...... ......... ... ......... ......... .. ... .... .... .. ... ... ................6 2 380383 1 THIS 26 H SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is dated 2018 and made BETWEEN: (1) NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, a company registered in England under number 2904587 having its registered
  • North, North Street, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1RL Tel: (01403) 215100 (Calls May Be Recorded) Fax: (01403) 262985 DX 57609 HORSHAM 6

    North, North Street, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1RL Tel: (01403) 215100 (Calls May Be Recorded) Fax: (01403) 262985 DX 57609 HORSHAM 6

    Park North, North Street, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1RL Tel: (01403) 215100 (calls may be recorded) Fax: (01403) 262985 DX 57609 HORSHAM 6 www.horsham.gov.uk Chief Executive - Tom Crowley Personal callers and deliveries: please come to Park North E-Mail: [email protected] Direct Line: 01403 215465 Development Control (North) Committee TUESDAY 3RD APRIL 2012 AT 5.30p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBER, PARK NORTH, NORTH STREET, HORSHAM Councillors: Liz Kitchen (Chairman) Roy Cornell (Vice-Chairman) John Bailey Ian Howard Andrew Baldwin David Jenkins Peter Burgess Christian Mitchell John Chidlow Josh Murphy Christine Costin Godfrey Newman Helena Croft Jim Rae Leonard Crosbie Stuart Ritchie Malcolm Curnock David Sheldon Laurence Deakins David Skipp Duncan England Simon Torn Frances Haigh Claire Vickers David Holmes Tricia Youtan You are summoned to the meeting to transact the following business Tom Crowley Chief Executive AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. To approve as correct the minutes of the meetings of the Committee held on 6th March 2012 (attached) 3. To receive any declarations of interest from Members of the Committee – any clarification on whether a Member has an interest should be sought before attending the meeting. 4. To receive any announcements from the Chairman of the Committee or the Chief Executive Paper certified as sustainable by an independent global forest certification organisation 5. To consider the reports of the following officers and to take such action thereon as may be necessary: Head of Planning & Environmental
  • Railway Network Including Cycle Restrictions

    Railway Network Including Cycle Restrictions

    Railway Network including cycle restrictions Key Regular Limited to Birmingham to Luton and Bedford service service and the North West Brighton Mainline route St. Pancras Milton Keynes International West London route Central London Farringdon Metro route Bletchley Victoria London Charing Cross City Thameslink to Highbury & Islington Oxted route Leighton Shoreditch High Street London London Buzzard London London Redhill route Waterloo East Blackfriars Cannon Whitechapel Tring (Southwark) Street Bridge Mainline Wes troute Battersea Park Shadwell Berkhamsted Watford Wembley Kensington Imperial Mainline East route Junction Central (Olympia) Wharf London Wapping Waterloo Coastway West route South Rotherhithe Hemel Harrow & Shepherd’s West Wandsworth Bermondsey Clapham Elephant Coastway East route Hempstead Wealdstone Bush Brompton Road Canada Water (for Earl’s Court) Junction & Castle Gatwick Express route Queens Surrey Quays Wandsworth Clapham Road Key stations Peckham Common High Street Peckham ( Clapham North) Rye The chart overleaf provides basic information on public transport routes for Other train operator route Balham New Cross Gate Ferry service Loughborough Denmark Hill East Dulwich * Wimbledon Wimbledon Haydons Road Tooting Junction managers. Limited Southern service Faygate Chase Streatham station South Hill Herne Hill Brockley Merton Other train operators provide additional services along some routes served by Southern. Mitcham Junction Mitcham Eastfields Streatham Tulse North Honor Oak Hill Dulwich This map is not to scale and is designed to show the line Morden Streatham West Park of routes rather than the exact position of stations. South Common Norwood Hackbridge The chart enables you to assess practical routes for staff and visitors to get to Forest Hill Norbury Gipsy Hill Cycle restriction St.
  • Govia Thameslink Railway Penalty Fares Scheme

    Govia Thameslink Railway Penalty Fares Scheme

    GOVIA THAMESLINK RAILWAY PENALTY FARES SCHEME CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 PENALTY FARES TRAINS 3 PENALTY FARES STATIONS 4 COMPULSORY TICKETS AREAS 5 TICKET FACILITIES 6 PUBLICITY AND WARNING NOTICES 7 SELECTION AND TRAINING OF AUTHORISED COLLECTORS 8 WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORISED COLLECTORS 9 TICKET FACILITIES AND DISPLAY OF WARNING NOTICES 10 SELLING TICKETS ON BOARD TRAINS 11 ARRANGEMENTS WITH OTHER OPERATORS 12 APPEALS Govia Thameslink Railway 2 1 July 2015 Penalty Fares Scheme 1 Introduction 1.1 We, Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) Ltd, give notice, under rule 3.2 of the Penalty Fares Rules 2002 that we wish to continue to operate a Penalty Fares Scheme across the Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern (TSGN) franchise, with effect from 26th July 2015. This document describes our Penalty Fares Scheme for the purposes of rule 3.2 b. 1.2 We have decided to introduce a Penalty Fares Scheme because the previous operator of the railway passenger services comprised of the Thameslink Great Northern franchise, First Capital Connect and Southern Railways, operated a Penalty Fares Scheme in such franchise area and the experience has proved that it is an efficient means to deter ticketless travel. In addition, once some Southeastern routes and stations are integrated into the TSGN franchise from 14 December 2014 and once the entire current Southern franchise is integrated into the TSGN franchise on 26th July 2015, it is important that there is consistency across all franchise areas (as Southeastern and Southern both also operate a Penalty Fares Scheme); so as to avoid causing confusion for our passengers. This scheme will now include all stations under schemes previously operated by Govia Thameslink Railway Limited and Southern Railway Limited.
  • West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study Consultation

    West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study Consultation

    Ref No: HT21 (14/15) Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Key Decision: Yes West Sussex County Council response to the Part I or Part II: Network Rail draft Sussex Area Route Study Part I consultation Report by Director of Highways and Transport and Electoral Director of Strategic Planning and Place Divisions: All Executive Summary Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on its draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. This study sets out a 30-year vision for this area of the rail network. It primarily focuses on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this time frame, but also considers growth in demand for rail travel to 2043. Consultation responses are being welcomed on any of the ideas and interventions set out in the study. The study will inform future decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning as well as the capacity of major stations, rather than specific timetable, service quality and station access issues which are concerns for the rail franchisee. Key issues highlighted in the County Council response include: support for investment to expand capacity for the Brighton Main Line; a request for further investment in rail infrastructure away from routes to London to support a balanced economy; support for analysis undertaken within the Study into the Arundel Chord scheme and provision of an improved journey times along the West Coastway route; and requests for greater attention to be made to level crossing and car parking issues within the study. Recommendation The Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport approves West Sussex County Council’s consultation response, contained in Appendix A of the report, for submission to the Network Rail draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study.
  • London and South Coast Rail Corridor Study: Terms of Reference

    London and South Coast Rail Corridor Study: Terms of Reference

    LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT APRIL 2016 LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT FINAL Project no: PPRO 4-92-157 / 3511970BN Date: April 2016 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Tel: +44 (0) 20 7314 5000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7314 5111 www.wspgroup.com www.pbworld.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................1 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................2 2.1 STUDY CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 2 2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................. 2 3 PROBLEM DEFINITION ...............................................................5 3.1 ‘DO NOTHING’ DEMAND ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 5 3.2 ‘DO NOTHING’ CAPACITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................... 7 4 REVIEWING THE OPTIONS ...................................................... 13 4.1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT.................................................................... 13 4.2 RAIL SCHEME PROPOSALS ......................................................................... 13 4.3 PACKAGE DEFINITION .................................................................................. 19 5 THE BML UPGRADE PACKAGE .............................................. 21 5.1 THE PROPOSALS ..........................................................................................
  • Willowfield Homes Homes Limited Land South Of

    Willowfield Homes Homes Limited Land South Of

    WILLOWFIELD HOMES HOMES LIMITED LAND SOUTH OF FRENCH GARDENS, RATHAM LANE BOSHAM, WEST SUSSEX Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Project Reference LLD2079-LPL-REP-001 Prepared by: KG / JP Checked By: JP Revision 00 Draft Issue Date: 15.02.2021 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A limited Minor adverse effect on localised field pattern and rural For users of Ratham Lane adjacent to the TPO'd woodland along character would result in the short term, awaiting the reinforcement of the western edge of the Site including local cyclists and vehicular i Introduction and Background boundaries from maturing of proposed vegetation in the mid to long users, (represented by Viewpoints No. 04) there would be a locally Lizard Landscape Design and Ecology has been commissioned by term. A Negligible effect is anticipated on both the wider rural setting perceptible change from the introduction of a publicly accessible Willowfield Homes Limited to undertake a Landscape and Visual of Broadbridge and separation with Fishbourne further to the east, (as access path into the woodland. This is considered to result in a Minor Impact Assessment, (LVIA) for French Gardens, Bosham, West highlighted for consideration within the Bosham Parish Character Area beneficial effect on the pleasantness of the glimpsed view for these Sussex, (Grid Reference: SU 81201 05514). 3: Broadbridge – Fishbourne Coastal Plain, (2013) and Chichester receptors. District Sub-area 91: Broadbridge - Fishbourne Coastal Plain, (2019, For users of Ratham Lane adjacent to the tree belt along the western ii Impact Assessment Terra Firma). edge of the Site the removal of trees required for the proposed Landscape Character The contribution of the western boundary treeline along Ratham Lane vehicular access road would be perceptible.
  • North) Committee TUESDAY 4TH MARCH 2014 at 5.30P.M

    North) Committee TUESDAY 4TH MARCH 2014 at 5.30P.M

    E-mail: [email protected] Direct line: 01403 215465 Development Control (North) Committee TUESDAY 4TH MARCH 2014 AT 5.30p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBER, PARK NORTH, NORTH STREET, HORSHAM Councillors: Liz Kitchen (Chairman) Roy Cornell (Vice-Chairman) John Bailey Ian Howard Andrew Baldwin David Jenkins Peter Burgess Christian Mitchell John Chidlow Josh Murphy Christine Costin Godfrey Newman Helena Croft Jim Rae Leonard Crosbie Stuart Ritchie Malcolm Curnock David Sheldon Laurence Deakins David Skipp Duncan England Simon Torn Frances Haigh Claire Vickers David Holmes Tricia Youtan You are summoned to the meeting to transact the following business Tom Crowley Chief Executive AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. To approve as correct the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 4th February 2014 (attached) 3. To receive any declarations of interest from Members of the Committee – any clarification on whether a Member has an interest should be sought before attending the meeting 4. To receive any announcements from the Chairman of the Committee or the Chief Executive 5. To consider the reports of the following officers and to take such action thereon as may be necessary: Head of Planning & Environmental Services Appeals Horsham District Council, Park North, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1RL Tel: 01403 215100 (calls may be recorded) www.horsham.gov.uk Chief Executive - Tom Crowley Applications for determination by Committee – Appendix A Item Ward Reference Site No. Number A1 Rudgwick DC/13/2170 Sussex Topiary, Naldretts Lane, Rudgwick A2 Rusper and DC/13/2183 Durrants Drive, Faygate Colgate A2 Rusper and DC/13/2184 Durrants Drive, Faygate Colgate A3 Denne DC/13/1829 53 Guildford Road, Horsham A4 Forest DC/13/1794 112 Brighton Road, Horsham A5 Itchingfield, DC/13/2288 Griffiths and Neilsen, The Business Park, Slinfold and Maydwell Avenue, Slinfold Warnham A6 Rusper and DC/13/2446 Land South of Buchan Hill Reservoir, Buchan Hill, Colgate Pease Pottage A7 Nuthurst DC/13/2451 Land Rear of 21 Woodlands Walk, Mannings Heath 6.
  • James and Susanna Pollard

    James and Susanna Pollard

    James and Susanna Pollard James and Susanna Pollard Benjamin S. Beck Privately printed in 2000 by the author, 72 Milton Court Road, LONDON SE14 6JJ All rights reserved. © Benjamin S. Beck Contents Beginnings ..............................................................7 Early childhood .........................................................11 Schooldays ............................................................. 13 From schooldays to marriage ...............................................23 Marriage, and a new family ................................................29 Horsham ............................................................... 41 In the cold ............................................................. 45 Change of direction ......................................................57 Park Farm .............................................................. 73 Final years .............................................................79 Afterword: What became of James and Susanna’s children and grandchildren ........85 Appendix: Five-generation Outline Pedigree of the Pollard family ................ A1 5 6 Beginnings James Pollard’s paternal grandfather James Pollard, a shopkeeper in Horsham, Sussex, died six years before James was born, but his paternal grandmother, Mary (née Hall), lived well into James’s lifetime, so I will have more to say of her here.1 His maternal grandfather, Thomas Hughesdon, a blacksmith from Deptford, Kent, also died before James was born. Though his maternal grandmother, Grace Hughesdon (her maiden
  • Highgrove Farm Broadbridge, Bosham, Chichester

    Highgrove Farm Broadbridge, Bosham, Chichester

    Highgrove Farm Broadbridge, Bosham, Chichester Design and Access Statement February 2021 Revision Date Revision Notes Prepared by Authorised by * 2020-12-18 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev B 2020-12-22 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev C 2021-01-04 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev D 2021-01-06 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev E 2021-01-29 VTS/IDP KD/SR Rev F 2021-02-02 VTS/IDP KD/SR \\IDPSVR01\Projects\N81-2818 Bosham, BDW S'ton\Documents\D&A\Bosham Design and Access Statement.indd [INDD Modified 2021-02-02 10:49], [PDF Output 2021-02-02 10:55] 2 Contents Section 1: Introduction Section 4: Access Proposals 1.1 Introduction 6 4.1 Connections, Movement and Street Hierarchy 38 1.2 Summary of Proposals 7 4.2 Parking 39 Section 5: BHL Assessment Section 2: The Site 5.1 Building for a Healthy Life Assessment 42 2.1 Site Location 10 2.2 Site Description 11 2.3 Site Photographs 12 2.4 Site Context 13 2.5 Constraints and Opportunities 15 2.6 Parish Council Consultation 16 2.7 Layout Analysis 17 2.8 Design Concept 18 Section 3: Design Proposals 3.1 Layout 20 3.2 Accommodation 22 3.3 Affordable Homes 23 3.4 Community / Village Hall 24 3.5 Spatial Syntax 25 3.6 Scale 26 3.7 Materials 27 3.8 Landscape 28 3.9 Streetscenes 30 3.10 Visualisations 32 3 4 Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction This Design and Access Statement has been prepared by IDPartnership on behalf of Barratt David Wilson Homes Southampton to accompany a detailed planning submission for a residential development on land at Highgrove Farm, Bosham, Chichester.
  • The Gibb Report – an Assessment

    The Gibb Report – an Assessment

    UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM PRESTIGE LECTURE 3rd October 2017 The Gibb Report – An Assessment by Piers Connor1 Background to the Gibb Report In September 2014, a new company, Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR), was given the contract to run train services operated over the Thameslink, Great Northern, Gatwick Express and Southern Railway. In the year leading up to the summer of 2016, the performance of the Southern Railway, the part of the Govia Thameslink Railway covering the suburban and south coast services between London and a large section of the southern coast of England, deteriorated to a level where passenger dissatisfaction was leading to public demonstrations and persistent media criticism. Eventually, the government was forced to act and they decided to commission a review of Southern and its service performance. The result was the Gibb Report2. to the West Midlands, North West and Scotland to Bedford Milton Keynes Central Bletchley Leighton Buzzard Tring SERVICES AND FACILITIES Berkhamsted London Cannon Street Hemel Hempstead This is a general guide to the basic daily services. Not all trains stop at all stations on each coloured line, so please check the timetable. Watford Junction RIVER THAMES Routes are shown in different colours to help identify the Harrow & Wealdstone London Bridge general pattern. Wembley Central South Bermondsey London Victoria to Highbury & Islington Shepherd’s Bush Queens Road Peckham Gatwick Express Kensington (Olympia) REGULAR ROUTE West Brompton Battersea Park SERVICE IDENTITY Peckham Rye New Cross Gate
  • South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study September 2015 Contents September 2015 South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study 02

    South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study September 2015 Contents September 2015 South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study 02

    Long Term Planning Process South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study September 2015 Contents September 2015 South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study 02 Foreword 03 Executive Summary 04 Chapter 1 – Background 16 Chapter 2 – Baseline 21 Chapter 3 – Future demand & resulting conditional outputs 34 Chapter 4 – Consultation responses 55 Chapter 5 – Control Period 6 priorities 63 Chapter 6 – Accommodating conditional outputs in 2043 101 Appendices 114 Glossary 182 Foreword September 2015 South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study 03 I am delighted to present the Sussex Route Study, which sets out the horizon to 2043, allowing sets of long term interventions to be strategic vision for the future of this vital part of the rail network presented alongside and consistent with a prioritised set of options over the next 30 years. for Control Period 6 (2019 – 2024). Each day this railway carries more than 60,000 people in the high On this route, developing options that can make a particular peak hour alone into Central London, with many thousands more contribution long term to improving performance as well as accessing key interchange points at East Croydon and Clapham meeting the capacity challenge is particularly important. Alongside Junction and travelling between regional centres on the route. this, the study has also considered the growing challenges of peak passenger volumes at stations, with a view to setting priorities and Working closely with industry stakeholders, Network Rail and train options for investment in CP6. operators have delivered significantly expanded capacity for passengers in recent years on the route, with Control Period 4 (2009 This study was published for Consultation in October 2014.