DOCSLIB.ORG

West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study Consultation Ref No: HT21 (14/15) Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Key Decision: Yes West Sussex County Council response to the Part I or Part II: Network Rail draft Sussex Area Route Study Part I consultation Report by Director of Highways and Transport and Electoral Director of Strategic Planning and Place Divisions: All Executive Summary Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on its draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. This study sets out a 30-year vision for this area of the rail network. It primarily focuses on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this time frame, but also considers growth in demand for rail travel to 2043. Consultation responses are being welcomed on any of the ideas and interventions set out in the study. The study will inform future decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning as well as the capacity of major stations, rather than specific timetable, service quality and station access issues which are concerns for the rail franchisee. Key issues highlighted in the County Council response include: support for investment to expand capacity for the Brighton Main Line; a request for further investment in rail infrastructure away from routes to London to support a balanced economy; support for analysis undertaken within the Study into the Arundel Chord scheme and provision of an improved journey times along the West Coastway route; and requests for greater attention to be made to level crossing and car parking issues within the study. Recommendation The Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport approves West Sussex County Council’s consultation response, contained in Appendix A of the report, for submission to the Network Rail draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. 1. Background and Context 1.1 Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on the draft Sussex Area Route Study. The consultation runs until Tuesday 13 January 2015. Further information and a copy of the draft study can be accessed from: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/long-term-planning-process/south- east-route-sussex-area-route-study-draft-for-consultation/. 1.2 The study sets the strategic vision for the future of the Sussex Area Route network focusing on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this rail industry planning time frame. The study also considers growth in demand over a 30-year timeframe to 2043. 1.3 The study will inform strategic decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning, as well as the capacity of major stations. The study does not address specific timetable issues, service quality or station access matters which are matters for the new rail franchise operator (Govia Thameslink Railway) to address. 1.4 This study is of importance to West Sussex as it includes all of the rail network services operating to or from the County. The study also includes many services across East Sussex, Surrey, west Kent and south Hampshire, and all services on the core routes to and from London Victoria, London Bridge and through the Thameslink Core to London St Pancras International (Fig. 1 Sussex Route Study Geographical Scope, at Appendix B). 1.5 The study is relevant to the objectives of the West Sussex Transport Plan 2011-2026, in particular improving connectivity and access to local labour markets and key centres, and delivering transport improvements to support and facilitate sustainable growth. 1.6 After the consultation closes in January, Network Rail will consider the responses, before preparing its final report which is expected to be published in summer 2015. 1.7 The proposed response to the consultation is included within Appendix A. 2. Consultation 2.1 An informal consultation exercise was undertaken inviting comments from key stakeholder groups, including local planning authorities, neighbouring highway authorities, Gatwick Airport Ltd, Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership, which has informed the consultation response. Respondents were asked to consider the strategic issues set out in Section 3. 2.2 There was a large amount of support for the intended position on these strategic issues. This informal consultation exercise highlighted the priorities of rail service provision across a number of issues, including capacity, service quality and accessibility, and ranked the overall priorities of rail service provision in supporting economic growth and providing additional capacity. 2.3 An early draft of the consultation response was also scrutinised by the Environmental and Community Services Select Committee. The Committee identified a series of issues which have been incorporated into the proposed response in Appendix A. 2.4 The Committee’s comments stressed the importance of the response linking to the economic strategy for West Sussex and highlighted issues related to level crossings, car parking at stations, and the need to stress the importance of capacity and reliability of services alongside journey time improvements. Comments also highlighted the potential to use spare capacity on different routes to address capacity issues on the Brighton Main Line. 3. Proposed response key issues The key issues considered in the response are set out below: 3.1 Capacity issues – the study identifies a set of proposed infrastructure improvements for the Brighton Main Line needed to meet forecast growth in passengers up to 2043. The improvements include capacity enhancements at London Victoria, Clapham Junction, Windmill Bridge Junction, East Croydon, Stoats Nest Junction, Gatwick Airport, Haywards Heath, Keymer Junction/Wivelsfield and Hove costing in the order of £1bn. The proposals will provide additional capacity benefiting West Sussex rail passengers through less congested travelling conditions and improved service reliability. This will support economic growth in West Sussex including continued growth in airport passengers using Gatwick Airport. It is proposed to support the proposals whilst also requesting further information and consultation on the capacity enhancement schemes at the earliest opportunity to provide greater understanding of their implications. 3.2 Meeting future capacity – the study identifies proposals which will focus investment to alleviate capacity issues on the Brighton Main Line corridor, as this is the where capacity issues are likely to be most prevalent in the future. This may increase the gap between strong economic performance in London and weaker performance outside London where transport connections are poorer. This may fail to support the County Council’s aspirations for a more balanced economy across the South East, including regeneration of the West Sussex coastal towns. Therefore, it is proposed to highlight the economic growth aspirations of local stakeholders and request that greater focus and investment is directed towards locations away from London to support economic uplift in these areas. As opportunities to enhance capacity into London will become increasingly expensive, investing in infrastructure which improves connections between locations outside London, may also be more affordable and represent better value for money. 3.3 Arundel Chord – Network Rail has analysed the costs and operational benefits of an Arundel Chord and concluded the scheme has a low cost- benefit ratio of 0.3 (see Fig. 2 Arundel Chord at Appendix C). The indicative cost estimate for this scheme is £55m. It is proposed to note the conclusions of the analysis, but highlight that economic performance of the West Sussex coastal towns suffers from the slow and unreliable east-west connections provided by the strategic road and rail networks. It is proposed to support further investigation into opportunities which would reduce journey times between main towns along the West Coastway and Arun Valley lines to enhance economic performance and complement planned investment in the strategic and local highway network in this area. 3.4 Brighton and West Coastway to West Country – Network Rail have analysed the potential to reduce journey times for some services along the West Coastway by changing stopping patterns alongside some infrastructure improvements. A limited stop service through West Sussex (Brighton-Worthing-Chichester-Havant) is considered which would potentially reduce journey times between Brighton and Chichester from 49 to 35 minutes and between Brighton and Southampton from 1hr 46min to 1hr 25min (as examples). However, this is likely to be accompanied by increases in average journey times between other local centres, including services between Brighton and Portsmouth and other intermediate stations. It is proposed to request further information and dialogue about the implications for all services along the West Coastway corridor, including connectivity with Arun Valley Line services, and investigation into economic and social impacts of this proposal. 3.5 Other strategic issues – The study does not mention the connectivity, congestion and safety issues associated with level crossings which are a particular problem in some areas of West Sussex. As alleviating these issues typically requires provision of new road bridges on the local highway network, it is proposed to highlight the issues caused by level crossings and request greater collaboration between Network Rail and local highway authorities to identify, develop, fund and implement improvements as opportunities arise. The study also does not highlight the issues associated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South West Main Line Strategic Study 3 MB
    OFFICIAL South West Main Line Strategic Study Phase 1 2021 1 OFFICIAL Network Rail Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2.0 Long-Term Planning Process ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 The South West Main Line Today................................................................................................................. 8 4.0 Strategic Context ..............................................................................................................................................13 5.0 South West Main Line - Demand ................................................................................................................25 6.0 Capacity Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................34 7.0 Intervention Feasibility ...................................................................................................................................59 8.0 Emerging Strategic Advice ............................................................................................................................62 Appendix A – Safety Baseline .....................................................................................................................................74 Appendix B – Development
    [Show full text]
  • Govia Thameslink Railway Limited 26Th Supplemental Agreement
    26th SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT between NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED as Network Rail And GOVIA THAMESLINK RAILWAY LIMITED as Train Operator relating to the Track Access Contract (Passenger Services) dated 02 March 2016 380383 CONTENTS 1. INTERPRETATION ....... .. ..... ...... ............ ... ....................... .................. .................. ............ .. 3 2. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM ........ .... ........ ..... ....... .. ....................... ............... ... .. ............. 3 3. AMENDMENTS TO CONTRACT .... ............... ......... ..... ..... ......... .. ... ......... .... .. ...... ... ........... 4 4. GENERAL ..... .... ............ .. .. .. .... ... .. ... ...... ..... ................. ... ............ .. .. .. .... ... ... ..... ........ ....... .... 4 5. THIRD PARTY RIGHTS .... ... .................. .............................. .. ........... ...... ... ...... .. ...... .. .... .... 4 6. LAW ..................... ...... .. .. .. .. ....... .. ... ...... ..................... .... .................. .. .. ... ... ........... ..... ... .... .. 4 7. COUNTERPARTS .... .. .... ........... ..... ........ ............... ......... ... ...................................... ....... .... 4 8. ANNEXA .... ......... .. ........ ... ....... ...... ......... ... ......... ......... .. ... .... .... .. ... ... ................6 2 380383 1 THIS 26 H SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is dated 2018 and made BETWEEN: (1) NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, a company registered in England under number 2904587 having its registered
    [Show full text]
  • North, North Street, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1RL Tel: (01403) 215100 (Calls May Be Recorded) Fax: (01403) 262985 DX 57609 HORSHAM 6
    Park North, North Street, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 1RL Tel: (01403) 215100 (calls may be recorded) Fax: (01403) 262985 DX 57609 HORSHAM 6 www.horsham.gov.uk Chief Executive - Tom Crowley Personal callers and deliveries: please come to Park North E-Mail: [email protected] Direct Line: 01403 215465 Development Control (North) Committee TUESDAY 3RD APRIL 2012 AT 5.30p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBER, PARK NORTH, NORTH STREET, HORSHAM Councillors: Liz Kitchen (Chairman) Roy Cornell (Vice-Chairman) John Bailey Ian Howard Andrew Baldwin David Jenkins Peter Burgess Christian Mitchell John Chidlow Josh Murphy Christine Costin Godfrey Newman Helena Croft Jim Rae Leonard Crosbie Stuart Ritchie Malcolm Curnock David Sheldon Laurence Deakins David Skipp Duncan England Simon Torn Frances Haigh Claire Vickers David Holmes Tricia Youtan You are summoned to the meeting to transact the following business Tom Crowley Chief Executive AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. To approve as correct the minutes of the meetings of the Committee held on 6th March 2012 (attached) 3. To receive any declarations of interest from Members of the Committee – any clarification on whether a Member has an interest should be sought before attending the meeting. 4. To receive any announcements from the Chairman of the Committee or the Chief Executive Paper certified as sustainable by an independent global forest certification organisation 5. To consider the reports of the following officers and to take such action thereon as may be necessary: Head of Planning & Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft Sussex Area Route Study Consultation
    Ref No: HT21 (14/15) Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Key Decision: Yes West Sussex County Council response to the Part I or Part II: Network Rail draft Sussex Area Route Study Part I consultation Report by Director of Highways and Transport and Electoral Director of Strategic Planning and Place Divisions: All Executive Summary Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on its draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. This study sets out a 30-year vision for this area of the rail network. It primarily focuses on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this time frame, but also considers growth in demand for rail travel to 2043. Consultation responses are being welcomed on any of the ideas and interventions set out in the study. The study will inform future decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning as well as the capacity of major stations, rather than specific timetable, service quality and station access issues which are concerns for the rail franchisee. Key issues highlighted in the County Council response include: support for investment to expand capacity for the Brighton Main Line; a request for further investment in rail infrastructure away from routes to London to support a balanced economy; support for analysis undertaken within the Study into the Arundel Chord scheme and provision of an improved journey times along the West Coastway route; and requests for greater attention to be made to level crossing and car parking issues within the study. Recommendation The Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport approves West Sussex County Council’s consultation response, contained in Appendix A of the report, for submission to the Network Rail draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Network Including Cycle Restrictions
    Railway Network including cycle restrictions Key Regular Limited to Birmingham to Luton and Bedford service service and the North West Brighton Mainline route St. Pancras Milton Keynes International West London route Central London Farringdon Metro route Bletchley Victoria London Charing Cross City Thameslink to Highbury & Islington Oxted route Leighton Shoreditch High Street London London Buzzard London London Redhill route Waterloo East Blackfriars Cannon Whitechapel Tring (Southwark) Street Bridge Mainline Wes troute Battersea Park Shadwell Berkhamsted Watford Wembley Kensington Imperial Mainline East route Junction Central (Olympia) Wharf London Wapping Waterloo Coastway West route South Rotherhithe Hemel Harrow & Shepherd’s West Wandsworth Bermondsey Clapham Elephant Coastway East route Hempstead Wealdstone Bush Brompton Road Canada Water (for Earl’s Court) Junction & Castle Gatwick Express route Queens Surrey Quays Wandsworth Clapham Road Key stations Peckham Common High Street Peckham ( Clapham North) Rye The chart overleaf provides basic information on public transport routes for Other train operator route Balham New Cross Gate Ferry service Loughborough Denmark Hill East Dulwich * Wimbledon Wimbledon Haydons Road Tooting Junction managers. Limited Southern service Faygate Chase Streatham station South Hill Herne Hill Brockley Merton Other train operators provide additional services along some routes served by Southern. Mitcham Junction Mitcham Eastfields Streatham Tulse North Honor Oak Hill Dulwich This map is not to scale and is designed to show the line Morden Streatham West Park of routes rather than the exact position of stations. South Common Norwood Hackbridge The chart enables you to assess practical routes for staff and visitors to get to Forest Hill Norbury Gipsy Hill Cycle restriction St.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • Wimbledon, 1951-53 (And a Few Other Railway Memories)
    Wimbledon, 1951-53 (and a few other railway memories) JDB, August 2013, minor additions and corrections May/August 2015 Neither this nor its companion piece “Derby Day, 1949” lays claim to any particular literary or other merit; they are merely pieces of first-hand reportage which may perhaps be of interest to future transport historians. In September 1951, I started going to school in Wimbledon. This involved a train journey morning and evening, an experience which put me off commuting for life but which also led to an interest in railways that still survives. In particular, one of the ways of walking from the station to school followed a footpath alongside the railway for the first half mile or so. Wimbledon is seven miles out of Waterloo, on what was originally the main line of the London and Southampton Railway. In due course, this became the London and South Western, then it was grouped into the Southern Railway, and by 1951 it had become part of British Railways. The lines from Waterloo divide at Clapham Junction, a line towards Windsor and Reading branching off to the north, and there are several connections between the two. One is at Putney, where a steep climb leads up to East Putney station on the Wimbledon branch of the London Underground District Line, and a Waterloo to Wimbledon suburban service via East Putney used this until 1941. Wimbledon station had been completely rebuilt in 1929, and in 1951 it comprised ten platforms. Four were terminal platforms for the District Line, this side of the station being essentially self-contained though there was a connection from the East Putney line to the main line just outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Govia Thameslink Railway Penalty Fares Scheme
    GOVIA THAMESLINK RAILWAY PENALTY FARES SCHEME CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 PENALTY FARES TRAINS 3 PENALTY FARES STATIONS 4 COMPULSORY TICKETS AREAS 5 TICKET FACILITIES 6 PUBLICITY AND WARNING NOTICES 7 SELECTION AND TRAINING OF AUTHORISED COLLECTORS 8 WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORISED COLLECTORS 9 TICKET FACILITIES AND DISPLAY OF WARNING NOTICES 10 SELLING TICKETS ON BOARD TRAINS 11 ARRANGEMENTS WITH OTHER OPERATORS 12 APPEALS Govia Thameslink Railway 2 1 July 2015 Penalty Fares Scheme 1 Introduction 1.1 We, Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) Ltd, give notice, under rule 3.2 of the Penalty Fares Rules 2002 that we wish to continue to operate a Penalty Fares Scheme across the Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern (TSGN) franchise, with effect from 26th July 2015. This document describes our Penalty Fares Scheme for the purposes of rule 3.2 b. 1.2 We have decided to introduce a Penalty Fares Scheme because the previous operator of the railway passenger services comprised of the Thameslink Great Northern franchise, First Capital Connect and Southern Railways, operated a Penalty Fares Scheme in such franchise area and the experience has proved that it is an efficient means to deter ticketless travel. In addition, once some Southeastern routes and stations are integrated into the TSGN franchise from 14 December 2014 and once the entire current Southern franchise is integrated into the TSGN franchise on 26th July 2015, it is important that there is consistency across all franchise areas (as Southeastern and Southern both also operate a Penalty Fares Scheme); so as to avoid causing confusion for our passengers. This scheme will now include all stations under schemes previously operated by Govia Thameslink Railway Limited and Southern Railway Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • SCRP Annual Review 2018
    2018 Annual Review WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP connecting communities with places and opportunities SUSSEX COMMUNITY RAIL PARTNERSHIP CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION SCRP IN 2018 Welcome to our Review of 2018 Partnership structure 2018 has been an incredibly busy year for the Sussex Sussex Community Rail Partnership (SCRP) was formed Community Rail Partnership (SCRP), now in its 10th year in 2002 and has operated as a not for profi t Limited as a Limited Company. Company since 2008. SCRP is managed by volunteer A new community line was launched between Hove and directors, who provide local, independent expertise. We Angmering and the North Downs Line was extended to employ eight staff who coordinate project work within Reading. 18 new station partnerships were formed with local their community area. community support. Go-Learn reached over 3,200 children and Active Access We work in partnership with train operators, Network Rail, community groups, supported over 70 young people. The SCRP worked closely with partners to local authorities and local businesses, helping them to achieve their objectives. deliver World War 1 commemorations at 16 stations and launched a new suite SCRP’s Stakeholder Advisory Board meets twice a year and represents an of Line Guides and promotional videos. opportunity to update members on developments, to seek guidance on future The SCRP works with many partners to deliver projects, including individuals, strategy and to hear guest speakers from the rail industry. community groups, businesses, Network Rail and local authorities. We are SCRP now has seven Community Rail Lines, and each has a Development grateful for the support we receive from Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) and Offi cer who arranges four steering group meetings a year to monitor progress Great Western Railway (GWR) and our stakeholders who provide advice and on the annual action plan.
    [Show full text]
  • London and South Coast Rail Corridor Study: Terms of Reference
    LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT APRIL 2016 LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT FINAL Project no: PPRO 4-92-157 / 3511970BN Date: April 2016 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Tel: +44 (0) 20 7314 5000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7314 5111 www.wspgroup.com www.pbworld.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................1 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................2 2.1 STUDY CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 2 2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................. 2 3 PROBLEM DEFINITION ...............................................................5 3.1 ‘DO NOTHING’ DEMAND ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 5 3.2 ‘DO NOTHING’ CAPACITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................... 7 4 REVIEWING THE OPTIONS ...................................................... 13 4.1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT.................................................................... 13 4.2 RAIL SCHEME PROPOSALS ......................................................................... 13 4.3 PACKAGE DEFINITION .................................................................................. 19 5 THE BML UPGRADE PACKAGE .............................................. 21 5.1 THE PROPOSALS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Journey to Work
    YOUR JOURNEY TO WORK Staff Travel Plan 2013-2030 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 I have pleasure in introducing the One of the themes identified within ‘Access Gatwick’ is that the airport is a place of work for over 21,000 THE FUTURE OF TRAVEL 4 Airport Staff Travel Plan which will employees in 230 companies. Each year we estimate 1 GATWICK AIRPORT 9 support ‘Access Gatwick’ our Airport that the number of journeys made by staff to and from work is around 10 million; therefore the sustainable 2 GOVERNMENT GUIDANCE AND Surface Access Strategy. Together development of staff travel is a key element of our IMPORTANCE OF TRAVEL 13 they will deliver our commitments plans for the future. 3 GATWICK AREA TRANSPORT FORUM 19 to encourage sustainable journeys In 2012, our Staff Travel Survey showed that 32.2% of to and from the airport. employees were using public transport and sustainable 4 GATWICK TRANSPORT HUB 25 travel methods for their journey to work. Our target 5 MONITORING OUR PERFORMANCE 43 is to increase this figure to 40% of staff travelling on public transport by the time Gatwick is serving 40 million passengers per annum. This Staff Travel Plan, therefore not only supports the ambitions for growth, our ASAS ‘Access Gatwick’, but sets out in detail how we aim to meet our future target for staff travel. The principle aims of the Gatwick Staff Travel Plan are: • Improve the choice of transport options and facilities available to all employees working at Gatwick • Reduce the local, national and global environmental impact of airport staff travel to and from work by raising awareness • Promote more sustainable means of transport I commend this Plan to you.
    [Show full text]