DOCSLIB.ORG

West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft Sussex Area Route Study Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft Sussex Area Route Study Consultation Ref No: HT21 (14/15) Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Key Decision: Yes West Sussex County Council response to the Part I or Part II: Network Rail draft Sussex Area Route Study Part I consultation Report by Director of Highways and Transport and Electoral Director of Strategic Planning and Place Divisions: All Executive Summary Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on its draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. This study sets out a 30-year vision for this area of the rail network. It primarily focuses on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this time frame, but also considers growth in demand for rail travel to 2043. Consultation responses are being welcomed on any of the ideas and interventions set out in the study. The study will inform future decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning as well as the capacity of major stations, rather than specific timetable, service quality and station access issues which are concerns for the rail franchisee. Key issues highlighted in the County Council response include: support for investment to expand capacity for the Brighton Main Line; a request for further investment in rail infrastructure away from routes to London to support a balanced economy; support for analysis undertaken within the Study into the Arundel Chord scheme and provision of an improved journey times along the West Coastway route; and requests for greater attention to be made to level crossing and car parking issues within the study. Recommendation The Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport approves West Sussex County Council’s consultation response, contained in Appendix A of the report, for submission to the Network Rail draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. 1. Background and Context 1.1 Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on the draft Sussex Area Route Study. The consultation runs until Tuesday 13 January 2015. Further information and a copy of the draft study can be accessed from: http://www.networkrail.co.uk/long-term-planning-process/south- east-route-sussex-area-route-study-draft-for-consultation/. 1.2 The study sets the strategic vision for the future of the Sussex Area Route network focusing on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this rail industry planning time frame. The study also considers growth in demand over a 30-year timeframe to 2043. 1.3 The study will inform strategic decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning, as well as the capacity of major stations. The study does not address specific timetable issues, service quality or station access matters which are matters for the new rail franchise operator (Govia Thameslink Railway) to address. 1.4 This study is of importance to West Sussex as it includes all of the rail network services operating to or from the County. The study also includes many services across East Sussex, Surrey, west Kent and south Hampshire, and all services on the core routes to and from London Victoria, London Bridge and through the Thameslink Core to London St Pancras International (Fig. 1 Sussex Route Study Geographical Scope, at Appendix B). 1.5 The study is relevant to the objectives of the West Sussex Transport Plan 2011-2026, in particular improving connectivity and access to local labour markets and key centres, and delivering transport improvements to support and facilitate sustainable growth. 1.6 After the consultation closes in January, Network Rail will consider the responses, before preparing its final report which is expected to be published in summer 2015. 1.7 The proposed response to the consultation is included within Appendix A. 2. Consultation 2.1 An informal consultation exercise was undertaken inviting comments from key stakeholder groups, including local planning authorities, neighbouring highway authorities, Gatwick Airport Ltd, Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership, which has informed the consultation response. Respondents were asked to consider the strategic issues set out in Section 3. 2.2 There was a large amount of support for the intended position on these strategic issues. This informal consultation exercise highlighted the priorities of rail service provision across a number of issues, including capacity, service quality and accessibility, and ranked the overall priorities of rail service provision in supporting economic growth and providing additional capacity. 2.3 An early draft of the consultation response was also scrutinised by the Environmental and Community Services Select Committee. The Committee identified a series of issues which have been incorporated into the proposed response in Appendix A. 2.4 The Committee’s comments stressed the importance of the response linking to the economic strategy for West Sussex and highlighted issues related to level crossings, car parking at stations, and the need to stress the importance of capacity and reliability of services alongside journey time improvements. Comments also highlighted the potential to use spare capacity on different routes to address capacity issues on the Brighton Main Line. 3. Proposed response key issues The key issues considered in the response are set out below: 3.1 Capacity issues – the study identifies a set of proposed infrastructure improvements for the Brighton Main Line needed to meet forecast growth in passengers up to 2043. The improvements include capacity enhancements at London Victoria, Clapham Junction, Windmill Bridge Junction, East Croydon, Stoats Nest Junction, Gatwick Airport, Haywards Heath, Keymer Junction/Wivelsfield and Hove costing in the order of £1bn. The proposals will provide additional capacity benefiting West Sussex rail passengers through less congested travelling conditions and improved service reliability. This will support economic growth in West Sussex including continued growth in airport passengers using Gatwick Airport. It is proposed to support the proposals whilst also requesting further information and consultation on the capacity enhancement schemes at the earliest opportunity to provide greater understanding of their implications. 3.2 Meeting future capacity – the study identifies proposals which will focus investment to alleviate capacity issues on the Brighton Main Line corridor, as this is the where capacity issues are likely to be most prevalent in the future. This may increase the gap between strong economic performance in London and weaker performance outside London where transport connections are poorer. This may fail to support the County Council’s aspirations for a more balanced economy across the South East, including regeneration of the West Sussex coastal towns. Therefore, it is proposed to highlight the economic growth aspirations of local stakeholders and request that greater focus and investment is directed towards locations away from London to support economic uplift in these areas. As opportunities to enhance capacity into London will become increasingly expensive, investing in infrastructure which improves connections between locations outside London, may also be more affordable and represent better value for money. 3.3 Arundel Chord – Network Rail has analysed the costs and operational benefits of an Arundel Chord and concluded the scheme has a low cost- benefit ratio of 0.3 (see Fig. 2 Arundel Chord at Appendix C). The indicative cost estimate for this scheme is £55m. It is proposed to note the conclusions of the analysis, but highlight that economic performance of the West Sussex coastal towns suffers from the slow and unreliable east-west connections provided by the strategic road and rail networks. It is proposed to support further investigation into opportunities which would reduce journey times between main towns along the West Coastway and Arun Valley lines to enhance economic performance and complement planned investment in the strategic and local highway network in this area. 3.4 Brighton and West Coastway to West Country – Network Rail have analysed the potential to reduce journey times for some services along the West Coastway by changing stopping patterns alongside some infrastructure improvements. A limited stop service through West Sussex (Brighton-Worthing-Chichester-Havant) is considered which would potentially reduce journey times between Brighton and Chichester from 49 to 35 minutes and between Brighton and Southampton from 1hr 46min to 1hr 25min (as examples). However, this is likely to be accompanied by increases in average journey times between other local centres, including services between Brighton and Portsmouth and other intermediate stations. It is proposed to request further information and dialogue about the implications for all services along the West Coastway corridor, including connectivity with Arun Valley Line services, and investigation into economic and social impacts of this proposal. 3.5 Other strategic issues – The study does not mention the connectivity, congestion and safety issues associated with level crossings which are a particular problem in some areas of West Sussex. As alleviating these issues typically requires provision of new road bridges on the local highway network, it is proposed to highlight the issues caused by level crossings and request greater collaboration between Network Rail and local highway authorities to identify, develop, fund and implement improvements as opportunities arise. The study also does not highlight the issues associated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • SCRP Annual Review 2018
    2018 Annual Review WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP connecting communities with places and opportunities SUSSEX COMMUNITY RAIL PARTNERSHIP CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION SCRP IN 2018 Welcome to our Review of 2018 Partnership structure 2018 has been an incredibly busy year for the Sussex Sussex Community Rail Partnership (SCRP) was formed Community Rail Partnership (SCRP), now in its 10th year in 2002 and has operated as a not for profi t Limited as a Limited Company. Company since 2008. SCRP is managed by volunteer A new community line was launched between Hove and directors, who provide local, independent expertise. We Angmering and the North Downs Line was extended to employ eight staff who coordinate project work within Reading. 18 new station partnerships were formed with local their community area. community support. Go-Learn reached over 3,200 children and Active Access We work in partnership with train operators, Network Rail, community groups, supported over 70 young people. The SCRP worked closely with partners to local authorities and local businesses, helping them to achieve their objectives. deliver World War 1 commemorations at 16 stations and launched a new suite SCRP’s Stakeholder Advisory Board meets twice a year and represents an of Line Guides and promotional videos. opportunity to update members on developments, to seek guidance on future The SCRP works with many partners to deliver projects, including individuals, strategy and to hear guest speakers from the rail industry. community groups, businesses, Network Rail and local authorities. We are SCRP now has seven Community Rail Lines, and each has a Development grateful for the support we receive from Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) and Offi cer who arranges four steering group meetings a year to monitor progress Great Western Railway (GWR) and our stakeholders who provide advice and on the annual action plan.
    [Show full text]
  • West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study Consultation
    Ref No: HT21 (14/15) Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Key Decision: Yes West Sussex County Council response to the Part I or Part II: Network Rail draft Sussex Area Route Study Part I consultation Report by Director of Highways and Transport and Electoral Director of Strategic Planning and Place Divisions: All Executive Summary Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on its draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. This study sets out a 30-year vision for this area of the rail network. It primarily focuses on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this time frame, but also considers growth in demand for rail travel to 2043. Consultation responses are being welcomed on any of the ideas and interventions set out in the study. The study will inform future decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning as well as the capacity of major stations, rather than specific timetable, service quality and station access issues which are concerns for the rail franchisee. Key issues highlighted in the County Council response include: support for investment to expand capacity for the Brighton Main Line; a request for further investment in rail infrastructure away from routes to London to support a balanced economy; support for analysis undertaken within the Study into the Arundel Chord scheme and provision of an improved journey times along the West Coastway route; and requests for greater attention to be made to level crossing and car parking issues within the study. Recommendation The Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport approves West Sussex County Council’s consultation response, contained in Appendix A of the report, for submission to the Network Rail draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study.
    [Show full text]
  • London and South Coast Rail Corridor Study: Terms of Reference
    LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT APRIL 2016 LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT FINAL Project no: PPRO 4-92-157 / 3511970BN Date: April 2016 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Tel: +44 (0) 20 7314 5000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7314 5111 www.wspgroup.com www.pbworld.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................1 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................2 2.1 STUDY CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 2 2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................. 2 3 PROBLEM DEFINITION ...............................................................5 3.1 ‘DO NOTHING’ DEMAND ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 5 3.2 ‘DO NOTHING’ CAPACITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................... 7 4 REVIEWING THE OPTIONS ...................................................... 13 4.1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT.................................................................... 13 4.2 RAIL SCHEME PROPOSALS ......................................................................... 13 4.3 PACKAGE DEFINITION .................................................................................. 19 5 THE BML UPGRADE PACKAGE .............................................. 21 5.1 THE PROPOSALS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Journey to Work
    YOUR JOURNEY TO WORK Staff Travel Plan 2013-2030 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 I have pleasure in introducing the One of the themes identified within ‘Access Gatwick’ is that the airport is a place of work for over 21,000 THE FUTURE OF TRAVEL 4 Airport Staff Travel Plan which will employees in 230 companies. Each year we estimate 1 GATWICK AIRPORT 9 support ‘Access Gatwick’ our Airport that the number of journeys made by staff to and from work is around 10 million; therefore the sustainable 2 GOVERNMENT GUIDANCE AND Surface Access Strategy. Together development of staff travel is a key element of our IMPORTANCE OF TRAVEL 13 they will deliver our commitments plans for the future. 3 GATWICK AREA TRANSPORT FORUM 19 to encourage sustainable journeys In 2012, our Staff Travel Survey showed that 32.2% of to and from the airport. employees were using public transport and sustainable 4 GATWICK TRANSPORT HUB 25 travel methods for their journey to work. Our target 5 MONITORING OUR PERFORMANCE 43 is to increase this figure to 40% of staff travelling on public transport by the time Gatwick is serving 40 million passengers per annum. This Staff Travel Plan, therefore not only supports the ambitions for growth, our ASAS ‘Access Gatwick’, but sets out in detail how we aim to meet our future target for staff travel. The principle aims of the Gatwick Staff Travel Plan are: • Improve the choice of transport options and facilities available to all employees working at Gatwick • Reduce the local, national and global environmental impact of airport staff travel to and from work by raising awareness • Promote more sustainable means of transport I commend this Plan to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Publicity Material List
    Early Guides and Publicity Material Inventory Type Company Title Author Date Notes Location No. Guidebook Cambrian Railway Tours in Wales c 1900 Front cover not there 2000-7019 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook Furness Railway The English Lakeland 1911 2000-7027 ALS5/49/A/1 Travel Guide Cambrian & Mid-Wales Railway Gossiping Guide to Wales 1870 1999-7701 ALS5/49/A/1 The English Lakeland: the Paradise of Travel Guide Furness Railway 1916 1999-7700 ALS5/49/A/1 Tourists Guidebook Furness Railway Illustrated Guide Golding, F 1905 2000-7032 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook North Staffordshire Railway Waterhouses and the Manifold Valley 1906 Card bookmark 2001-7197 ALS5/49/A/1 The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Inscribed "To Aman Mosley"; signature of Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1908 1999-8072 ALS5/29/A/1 Staffordshire Railway chairman of NSR The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Moores, Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1891 1999-8083 ALS5/49/A/1 Staffordshire Railway George Travel Guide Maryport & Carlisle Railway The Borough Guides: No 522 1911 1999-7712 ALS5/29/A/1 Travel Guide London & North Western Railway Programme of Tours in North Wales 1883 1999-7711 ALS5/29/A/1 Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7680 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7681 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales,
    [Show full text]
  • Arun Valley Line Safer If Travelling Along the Arun Valley Line During and More Reliable
    Back Cover Front Cover Key dates July 2021 M T W T F S S Advanced Notice 1 2 3 4 Line Closures 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Affecting all trains via Horsham 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Saturday 14 – Sunday 22 August 2021 26 27 28 29 30 31 Plus several weekends between August 2021 July and October 2021 M T W T F S S 1 For more information please visit 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 networkrail.co.uk/arunvalley 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 @NetworkRailSE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 September 2021 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 October 2021 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 All lines via Horsham closed HOR 1120/01 What are we doing and why? Leave more time We’re carrying out essential engineering for your journey work to make the Arun Valley line safer If travelling along the Arun Valley line during and more reliable. This will allow for the line closures, you will need to take a future passenger growth and improve replacement bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail in the South East
    Community rail in the South East Sponsored by COMMUNITY RAIL IN THE SOUTH EAST Community rail is a unique and “ growing movement comprising Local railways provide vital lifelines more than 70 community rail that are invaluable, and they are a very “sustainable way to travel. partnerships (CRPs) and 1,000 volunteer groups across Britain Tim Barkley, Southeast Communities CRP that help communities get the most from their railways. It is about engaging local people at grassroots level to promote social inclusion, sustainable and healthy travel, wellbeing, economic development, and tourism. This involves working with train operators, local authorities, and other partners to highlight local needs and opportunities, ensuring communities have a voice in rail and transport development. Community rail is evidenced to contribute high levels of social, environmental, and economic value to local areas, and countless stations have been transformed into hubs at the heart of the communities they serve. Evidence also shows community rail delivering life-changing benefits for individuals and families, helping people access new opportunities through sustainable travel by rail. We are passionate about community The movement is currently looking to play a key role rail and putting stations at the heart of “ “ in the recovery of our communities post-COVID, the communities they serve, helping to helping them build back better and greener. promote sustainable and healthy travel, involve diverse groups, and support social and economic development. The South East in numbers: Andy Harrowell, South Western Railway Working along railway lines, with 14 industry partners, to engage local community communities. Partnerships stretch rail from Hertfordshire down to Kent, Sussex, and Hampshire on the Each Year Giving partnerships South Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • SCRP Line Map 2019
    Reading Morden South Hackbridge Earley East Croydon Carshalton Wallington Waddon West Croydon Winnersh Triangle St. Helier South Croydon Winnersh Sanderstead Riddlesdown Carshalton Beeches Uckfield to Oxted and Sutton Common Sutton Wokingham West Purley Oaks Upper Warlingham East Grinstead Line Sutton Belmont Crowthorne Coulsdon Purley Woldingham Woodmansterne Town Reedham Kenley Whyteleafe to Sevenoaks Sandhurst Cheam Banstead Oxted and London Whyteleafe Blackwater Ewell East Coulsdon South to London Epsom Downs Chipstead South Ashford Farnborough North Epsom Hurst Green to London International Kingswood Merstham Caterham Tonbridge to Reigate Line North Camp Ashtead Redhill to Dover and Europe to London Tadworth Edenbridge Leigh Tonbridge Ham Street Ash Leatherhead Tattenham to Kent Coast Corner Reigate Earlswood Nutfield Godstone Wanborough London Road Edenbridge Penshurst High Brooms Appledore Guildford (Guildford) Horsley Bookham Town Salfords 231,233 Tunbridge Wells Rye Effingham Lingfield Hever Frant Clandon Box Hill & Westhumble Horley Shalford Junction Wadhurst Winchelsea Dorking Dormans to Portsmouth Gatwick Airport Cowden Stonegate Gomshall Deepdene Dorking Doleham* Three Bridges East Grinstead Ashurst 28,29 Etchingham Robertsbridge Chilworth Dorking West Holmwood Betchworth 281,291,400 Three Oaks North Downs Line Battle 21 Eridge Ockley Crawley Balcombe Crowhurst Ore 279 Crowborough Warnham West St. Leonards Littlehaven Faygate* Ifield Haywards Heath Rail Line Hastings Horsham Buxted Wivelsfield St. Leonards South Downs Christ’s
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information for the Transport Committee's Meeting on 7 March on Crossrail and the Future for Rail in London
    Background information for the Transport Committee’s meeting on 7 March on Crossrail and the future for rail in London This document contains written submissions received for the Transport Committee’s review of Crossrail and the future for rail in London. Contents: Page number: Submissions received from stakeholders: 1. Crossrail 1 2. Network Rail 23 3. Travelwatch 28 4. ORR 35 5. RailFreight 37 6. TfL response to NR business plan 39 Submissions received from rail user groups and members of the public: 7. London Forum of Civic & Amenity Societies 47 8. Brent Council 49 9. Graham Larkbey 50 10. Clapham Transport User Group Submission 50 11. Simon Fisher 62 12. West London Line Group 64 13. James Ayles 67 12. East Surrey Transport Committee 69 Report for the London Assembly Transport Committee Document Number: CR-XRL-Z-RGN-CR001-50004 Document History: Version: Date: Prepared by: Checked by: Authorised by: Reason for Revision: For issue to the London Andrew 1.0 27-02-13 Luke Jouanides Sarah Johnson Assembly Transport Wolstenholme Committee This document contains proprietary information. No part of this document may be reproduced without prior written consent from the chief executive of Crossrail Ltd. Page 1 of 22 © Crossrail Limited 1 Document Title Document Number CR-XRL-Z-RGN-CR001-50004 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 2 Delivery: progress, scope, risk and schedule ........................................................ 3 2.1 Progress
    [Show full text]
  • Out with Old and in with the New Community Rail Awards
    December 2020 OUT WITH OLD AND IN WITH THE NEW Earlier this year we decided it was time for a change of name to one that better reflects the counties, rail lines and communities we work with, after some discussion we became the Southeast Communities Rail Partnership. Formed in 2003 SCRP worked only on the Uckfield line with one member of staff. In those early years we were working under the umbrella of Action in Rural Sussex. Since being incorporated as a Company in 2008, SCRP has been spread the community rail message far and wide, now working with five train companies; GTR, Southern, SWR, GWR, Cross Country on eight lines throughout a huge part of the South East ; in Kent, East Sussex, West Sussex, Surrey, Berkshire and Hampshire. We are supported by the members of the Steering Groups, countless volunteers, Station Partners, Parish, Town, District, County Councils, stakeholders, community groups, tourist organisations, visitor attractions, voluntary associations, the list is endless, and we thank each and everyone of you. The launch of our new identity has included updating our website to www.southeastcrp.org , staff contact emails are now [email protected] the change is also reflected on our other social media. COMMUNITY RAIL AWARDS We were pleased to learn that several of our 2020 projects were recognised as deserving to be shortlisted for the annual 2020 Community Rail Network Awards: GTR, SCRP, County Care, Aldingbourne Trust Good to talk – Even better to share Sussex Community Rail Partnership/ Culture Shift – Get Into Trains Sussex CRP – Horsham Station Pianimal We won a third place in the ‘working with diverse groups’ category for our joint project working with GTR and the two station partner groups.
    [Show full text]