In August 2012 Our Members Told Us Their Priorities for Rail Services

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In August 2012 Our Members Told Us Their Priorities for Rail Services IN AUGUST 2012 OUR MEMBERS TOLD US THEIR PRIORITIES FOR RAIL SERVICES: 1. More reliable services (services less prone to disruption and breakdown of rolling stock & infrastructure) 2. Later trains along the Arun Valley and West Coastway from London and from Chichester 3. Less overcrowding on trains at peak time 4. Additional direct peak hour trains to/from London Bridge 5. Improved information at stations when there is disruption 6. More frequent services on both lines 7. Improved information on board train when there is disruption 8. An end to station skipping (incl. terminating short of final destination) 9. A Sunday service to London via Dorking and Sutton 9. Ticket machines that are easy to read and which give all fare options 11. A simpler, more understandable fare structure 12. More parking spaces at stations throughout the network 13. Integrated train and bus travel to/from Arun Valley and West Coastway stations 13. Better concessions for school pupils/students 15. Better provision of services for special events (e.g. London Marathon, Glorious Goodwood, Goodwood Revival, Arundel Festival) 16. On board catering and/or outlets at stations e.g. shops, coffee bars www.wsrua.org.uk September 2012 A. Improvements to timetable and destinations served. A1. Express services to London. The service is at best “semi-fast” with long journey times from the coast. We propose that on arrival at Horsham there would be only 2 further stations as call points (e.g. Gatwick and East Croydon). The fastest service from Horsham is once a day (scheduled as 54 minutes) the same time as to Brighton but only half the distance! Quotes: “The current service from Billingshurst takes around 1hr 10mins, quite a long time.” "Need faster trains; Horsham is as big as Hayward’s Heath and would have more passengers than Hayward’s Heath if it had the same or a better service” “Horsham should have a 15 minute interval Victoria service taking no more than 45 minutes. Turn up at the station and guarantee arrive within 1 hour" A2. Trains to London Bridge: The A-V line does not have enough peak hour services to and from London Bridge. Quotes: “The London Bridge services now take longer than when British Rail were in charge.” “ There is only one direct from Barnham to London Bridge in the morning and one back in the evening both extremely well used as people are generally standing from Three Bridges in the morning and to Three Bridges in the evening.” “Currently there is only 1 direct service between Chichester and London Bridge in the morning peak and no direct services in the afternoon/evening peak.” “An earlier direct service (arriving by 8.00) to London Bridge and a later return service (leaving after 18:30) would be a great improvement to the Arun Valley service.” A3. Peak hour services calling at Gatwick in early morning peak (principally for staff and air passengers) and evening peak. Trains stop at Horley (where no-one alights) but not at Gatwick which is a major place of work for West Sussex residents as well as their local airport. If the timetable can only afford one stop it should be Gatwick not Horley. A4. Afternoon services between East Croydon and Chichester prove to be exceedingly over- crowded and prone to lateness. We need longer trains. A5. The Arun-Valley line trains should serve Southampton Airport every day of the week (not just on a Saturday – a nonsense). There is the opportunity here to link two airports – Gatwick and Southampton and to provide residents and business people in West Sussex with access to Southampton airport for business and leisure. A6. West Coastway services via Hove should be extended to Southampton Central (via Eastleigh and Southampton Airport). There are business people in West Sussex working in and beyond Portsmouth for whom current rail journeys are unnecessarily slow and convoluted. Also through services down the Arun Valley line. Quote: “we need restoration of direct no change of train services from Arun Valley stations to Chichester, Portsmouth and stations west. This is my highest priority.” A7. Train splitting: this does allow faster services from Chichester however it would be better to just have faster services for everyone which means: fewer stops after Crawley; using the fast line to East Croydon. A8. Station skipping. When there is any kind of disruption Southern are prone to skip smaller stations to get their service back to timetable. This is a massive inconvenience for people in rural areas for whom there is no other public transport. Quote: “Stop delaying on-time trains just to allow late services through” A9. Several services to Bognor are lost every week through trains terminating at Barnham. Quote: “An additional issue at Bognor Regis is having to set off at least half an hour earlier than would otherwise be necessary because of the frequency of trains being turned round at Barnham and not going to Bognor.” A10. Not enough peak time trains stop at Amberley. Although this is a small rural station it has a wide catchment in an area with very limited public transport. Quote: “A key train that should stop at Amberley is the 18:02 from Victoria.” A11. The Arun Valley passengers need more reliable connections for their onward journeys. Quote: "Improved or more reliable connections at Redhill for Tonbridge, at Gatwick for Reading, at Horsham for Dorking, and at Ford/Barnham for Worthing and Brighton.” A12. Later trains between Chichester and London. The last train down the Arun Valley leaves Victoria at 22:32. Quote: “Later trains: From Chichester up the Arun Valley, a train at 23.00 for the theatre. This could be the 22.40 retimed. From London, a 23.32 is needed.” A13. There is a need for integrated train and bus timetables so that rail users in rural areas have the option of using a bus rather than a car to access railheads. B. Service on board. B1 The on-board refreshment service should be re-instated particularly as the journey times are up to 2 hours. First class ticket holders should have a rebate until this happens. B2. Improved first class service including: separated seating (doors to 1st class compartments), plus ticket checks to remove squatters. Quotes: Trains are dirty and 1st class needs improving, a headrest cover is the only difference to standard. For over 40% more money to get a seat (not always guaranteed) is a disgrace! “When you purchase a 1st Class ticket you should get preferential seating as you are paying double the fare. The current difference between the 2 classes is almost none. Some of the 1st Class carriages up to London do not even have a charger plug.” B3. Power supply on board – these are long-distance commuter routes with high prices with worse facilities than a metro service. If this is a constraint of the rolling stock then DfT should stop ordering sub-standard trains – indeed DfT should stop interfering with the provision of rolling stock altogether. Quote: “Virgin managed to provide power sockets in all classes, why can’t Southern? C. Information. C1. Passengers want more contact when things do go wrong. We all know and accept that sometimes things don't go as planned but silence or no visible staff adds to the frustration. Just being told what's going on and knowing Southern are trying to fix it helps instil more confidence. Quotes: “I find twitter very helpful when delays occur far better than info on train or at stations as I follow Network Rail” “Travelling by train would be much more pleasant if there was a large reduction in the quantity and length of train announcements that do not convey direct journey information.” C2. We need…”more accurate station screens and announcements at times of disruption." C3. Performance information. The arrival/departure at each stop should be monitored and reported as part of the KPI\'s for service delivery improvement. The current reporting system does not make it clear when stations have been skipped, or when delays occur along the line but the train still arrives at the final destination reasonably on time. D. Rolling stock. D1. The 3&2 seating is uncomfortable and deeply unpopular. The West Coastway and Arun Valley lines to London are not metro services. Quote: “Southern need to address the 3&2 seating in Electrostars. Replacing the 2&2 table seating in the driving coaches of some of the units for 3&2 seating provides no further space for passengers & creates further problems for people passing through. The journey times can be up to three hours.” D2. Arun Valley rolling stock is being taken away to prop up other services. Quotes “The reduction in the number of carriages into London in the morning peak is becoming a big problem. Trains that were 12 cars are now 4 or 8 cars, whilst passenger numbers increase and more housing is built down the Arun Valley.” “Generally we need more comfortable seats” “Get rid of the most uncomfortable metal rimmed seats for cushioned ones “ “The 3&2 layout is cramped and not suitable for journeys of 2+ hours, current rolling stock seating is too narrow and poor quality.” E. Infrastructure. Re-signalling of Arun Valley line is an urgent priority to reduce journey times. This would shorten the length of time the stopping section has to wait at Horsham for joining and splitting. The Arun Valley line has the oldest working signalling system in the country. The boxes should be consigned to the Amberley Industrial Museum forthwith and the Arun Valley brought into the 19th century.
Recommended publications
  • West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft Sussex Area Route Study Consultation
    Ref No: HT21 (14/15) Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Key Decision: Yes West Sussex County Council response to the Part I or Part II: Network Rail draft Sussex Area Route Study Part I consultation Report by Director of Highways and Transport and Electoral Director of Strategic Planning and Place Divisions: All Executive Summary Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on its draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. This study sets out a 30-year vision for this area of the rail network. It primarily focuses on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this time frame, but also considers growth in demand for rail travel to 2043. Consultation responses are being welcomed on any of the ideas and interventions set out in the study. The study will inform future decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning as well as the capacity of major stations, rather than specific timetable, service quality and station access issues which are concerns for the rail franchisee. Key issues highlighted in the County Council response include: support for investment to expand capacity for the Brighton Main Line; a request for further investment in rail infrastructure away from routes to London to support a balanced economy; support for analysis undertaken within the Study into the Arundel Chord scheme and provision of an improved journey times along the West Coastway route; and requests for greater attention to be made to level crossing and car parking issues within the study. Recommendation The Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport approves West Sussex County Council’s consultation response, contained in Appendix A of the report, for submission to the Network Rail draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Submissions to the Call for Evidence from Organisations
    Submissions to the call for evidence from organisations Ref Organisation RD - 1 Abbey Flyer Users Group (ABFLY) RD - 2 ASLEF RD - 3 C2c RD - 4 Chiltern Railways RD - 5 Clapham Transport Users Group RD - 6 London Borough of Ealing RD - 7 East Surrey Transport Committee RD – 8a East Sussex RD – 8b East Sussex Appendix RD - 9 London Borough of Enfield RD - 10 England’s Economic Heartland RD – 11a Enterprise M3 LEP RD – 11b Enterprise M3 LEP RD - 12 First Great Western RD – 13a Govia Thameslink Railway RD – 13b Govia Thameslink Railway (second submission) RD - 14 Hertfordshire County Council RD - 15 Institute for Public Policy Research RD - 16 Kent County Council RD - 17 London Councils RD - 18 London Travelwatch RD – 19a Mayor and TfL RD – 19b Mayor and TfL RD - 20 Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum RD - 21 Network Rail RD – 22a Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) RD – 22b Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) – Annex RD - 23 London Borough of Redbridge RD - 24 Reigate, Redhill and District Rail Users Association RD - 25 RMT RD - 26 Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association RD - 27 South London Partnership RD - 28 Southeastern RD - 29 Surrey County Council RD - 30 The Railway Consultancy RD - 31 Tonbridge Line Commuters RD - 32 Transport Focus RD - 33 West Midlands ITA RD – 34a West Sussex County Council RD – 34b West Sussex County Council Appendix RD - 1 Dear Mr Berry In responding to your consultation exercise at https://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london- assembly/investigations/how-would-you-run-your-own-railway, I must firstly apologise for slightly missing the 1st July deadline, but nonetheless I hope that these views can still be taken into consideration by the Transport Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Corridor Evidence Base
    Transport Strategy for the South East ___ Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Client: Transport for the South East 10 December 2019 Our ref: 234337 Contents Page 4 Introduction 4 Definitions 5 Sources and Presentation 6 Strategic Corridor maps Appendices SE South East Radial Corridors SC South Central Radial Corridors SW South West Radial Corridors IO Inner Orbital Corridors OO Outer Orbital Corridors 3 | 10 December 2019 Strategic Corridor Evidence Base Introduction Introduction Definitions Table 1 | Strategic Corridor definitions 1 This document presents the evidence base 5 There are 23 Strategic Corridors in South East Area Ref Corridor Name M2/A2/Chatham Main Line underpinning the case for investment in the South England. These corridors were identified by SE1 (Dartford – Dover) East’s Strategic Corridors. It has been prepared for Transport for the South East, its Constituent A299/Chatham Main Line SE2 Transport for the South East (TfSE) – the emerging Authorities, and other stakeholders involved in the South (Faversham – Ramsgate) East M20/A20/High Speed 1/South Eastern Main Line SE3 Sub-National Transport Body for South East England development of the Economic Connectivity Review. (Dover – Sidcup) A21/Hastings Line – in support of its development of a Transport Since this review was published, the corridors have SE5 (Hastings – Sevenoaks) A22/A264/Oxted Line Strategy for South East England. been grouped into five areas. Some of the definitions SC1 (Crawley – Eastbourne) and names of some corridors cited in the Economic South M23/A23/Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • SCRP Annual Review 2018
    2018 Annual Review WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP connecting communities with places and opportunities SUSSEX COMMUNITY RAIL PARTNERSHIP CHAIRMAN’S INTRODUCTION SCRP IN 2018 Welcome to our Review of 2018 Partnership structure 2018 has been an incredibly busy year for the Sussex Sussex Community Rail Partnership (SCRP) was formed Community Rail Partnership (SCRP), now in its 10th year in 2002 and has operated as a not for profi t Limited as a Limited Company. Company since 2008. SCRP is managed by volunteer A new community line was launched between Hove and directors, who provide local, independent expertise. We Angmering and the North Downs Line was extended to employ eight staff who coordinate project work within Reading. 18 new station partnerships were formed with local their community area. community support. Go-Learn reached over 3,200 children and Active Access We work in partnership with train operators, Network Rail, community groups, supported over 70 young people. The SCRP worked closely with partners to local authorities and local businesses, helping them to achieve their objectives. deliver World War 1 commemorations at 16 stations and launched a new suite SCRP’s Stakeholder Advisory Board meets twice a year and represents an of Line Guides and promotional videos. opportunity to update members on developments, to seek guidance on future The SCRP works with many partners to deliver projects, including individuals, strategy and to hear guest speakers from the rail industry. community groups, businesses, Network Rail and local authorities. We are SCRP now has seven Community Rail Lines, and each has a Development grateful for the support we receive from Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) and Offi cer who arranges four steering group meetings a year to monitor progress Great Western Railway (GWR) and our stakeholders who provide advice and on the annual action plan.
    [Show full text]
  • West Sussex County Council Response to the Network Rail Draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study Consultation
    Ref No: HT21 (14/15) Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Key Decision: Yes West Sussex County Council response to the Part I or Part II: Network Rail draft Sussex Area Route Study Part I consultation Report by Director of Highways and Transport and Electoral Director of Strategic Planning and Place Divisions: All Executive Summary Network Rail is undertaking a consultation to gather views on its draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study. This study sets out a 30-year vision for this area of the rail network. It primarily focuses on rail industry Control Period 6 (2019-2024) to inform Government investment decisions for this time frame, but also considers growth in demand for rail travel to 2043. Consultation responses are being welcomed on any of the ideas and interventions set out in the study. The study will inform future decisions about rail infrastructure and rail service planning as well as the capacity of major stations, rather than specific timetable, service quality and station access issues which are concerns for the rail franchisee. Key issues highlighted in the County Council response include: support for investment to expand capacity for the Brighton Main Line; a request for further investment in rail infrastructure away from routes to London to support a balanced economy; support for analysis undertaken within the Study into the Arundel Chord scheme and provision of an improved journey times along the West Coastway route; and requests for greater attention to be made to level crossing and car parking issues within the study. Recommendation The Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport approves West Sussex County Council’s consultation response, contained in Appendix A of the report, for submission to the Network Rail draft South East Route: Sussex Area Route Study.
    [Show full text]
  • London and South Coast Rail Corridor Study: Terms of Reference
    LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT APRIL 2016 LONDON & SOUTH COAST RAIL CORRIDOR STUDY DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT FINAL Project no: PPRO 4-92-157 / 3511970BN Date: April 2016 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Tel: +44 (0) 20 7314 5000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7314 5111 www.wspgroup.com www.pbworld.com iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................1 2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................2 2.1 STUDY CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 2 2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................. 2 3 PROBLEM DEFINITION ...............................................................5 3.1 ‘DO NOTHING’ DEMAND ASSESSMENT ........................................................ 5 3.2 ‘DO NOTHING’ CAPACITY ASSESSMENT ..................................................... 7 4 REVIEWING THE OPTIONS ...................................................... 13 4.1 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT.................................................................... 13 4.2 RAIL SCHEME PROPOSALS ......................................................................... 13 4.3 PACKAGE DEFINITION .................................................................................. 19 5 THE BML UPGRADE PACKAGE .............................................. 21 5.1 THE PROPOSALS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Journey to Work
    YOUR JOURNEY TO WORK Staff Travel Plan 2013-2030 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 I have pleasure in introducing the One of the themes identified within ‘Access Gatwick’ is that the airport is a place of work for over 21,000 THE FUTURE OF TRAVEL 4 Airport Staff Travel Plan which will employees in 230 companies. Each year we estimate 1 GATWICK AIRPORT 9 support ‘Access Gatwick’ our Airport that the number of journeys made by staff to and from work is around 10 million; therefore the sustainable 2 GOVERNMENT GUIDANCE AND Surface Access Strategy. Together development of staff travel is a key element of our IMPORTANCE OF TRAVEL 13 they will deliver our commitments plans for the future. 3 GATWICK AREA TRANSPORT FORUM 19 to encourage sustainable journeys In 2012, our Staff Travel Survey showed that 32.2% of to and from the airport. employees were using public transport and sustainable 4 GATWICK TRANSPORT HUB 25 travel methods for their journey to work. Our target 5 MONITORING OUR PERFORMANCE 43 is to increase this figure to 40% of staff travelling on public transport by the time Gatwick is serving 40 million passengers per annum. This Staff Travel Plan, therefore not only supports the ambitions for growth, our ASAS ‘Access Gatwick’, but sets out in detail how we aim to meet our future target for staff travel. The principle aims of the Gatwick Staff Travel Plan are: • Improve the choice of transport options and facilities available to all employees working at Gatwick • Reduce the local, national and global environmental impact of airport staff travel to and from work by raising awareness • Promote more sustainable means of transport I commend this Plan to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Publicity Material List
    Early Guides and Publicity Material Inventory Type Company Title Author Date Notes Location No. Guidebook Cambrian Railway Tours in Wales c 1900 Front cover not there 2000-7019 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook Furness Railway The English Lakeland 1911 2000-7027 ALS5/49/A/1 Travel Guide Cambrian & Mid-Wales Railway Gossiping Guide to Wales 1870 1999-7701 ALS5/49/A/1 The English Lakeland: the Paradise of Travel Guide Furness Railway 1916 1999-7700 ALS5/49/A/1 Tourists Guidebook Furness Railway Illustrated Guide Golding, F 1905 2000-7032 ALS5/49/A/1 Guidebook North Staffordshire Railway Waterhouses and the Manifold Valley 1906 Card bookmark 2001-7197 ALS5/49/A/1 The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Inscribed "To Aman Mosley"; signature of Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1908 1999-8072 ALS5/29/A/1 Staffordshire Railway chairman of NSR The Official Illustrated Guide to the North Moores, Travel Guide North Staffordshire Railway 1891 1999-8083 ALS5/49/A/1 Staffordshire Railway George Travel Guide Maryport & Carlisle Railway The Borough Guides: No 522 1911 1999-7712 ALS5/29/A/1 Travel Guide London & North Western Railway Programme of Tours in North Wales 1883 1999-7711 ALS5/29/A/1 Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7680 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales, Liverpool & Wirral Railway 1902 Eight page leaflet/ 3 copies 2000-7681 ALS5/49/A/1 Wales Weekend, Ten Days & Tourist Bookings to Guidebook North Wales,
    [Show full text]
  • Arun Valley Line Safer If Travelling Along the Arun Valley Line During and More Reliable
    Back Cover Front Cover Key dates July 2021 M T W T F S S Advanced Notice 1 2 3 4 Line Closures 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Affecting all trains via Horsham 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Saturday 14 – Sunday 22 August 2021 26 27 28 29 30 31 Plus several weekends between August 2021 July and October 2021 M T W T F S S 1 For more information please visit 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 networkrail.co.uk/arunvalley 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 @NetworkRailSE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 September 2021 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 October 2021 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 All lines via Horsham closed HOR 1120/01 What are we doing and why? Leave more time We’re carrying out essential engineering for your journey work to make the Arun Valley line safer If travelling along the Arun Valley line during and more reliable. This will allow for the line closures, you will need to take a future passenger growth and improve replacement bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Rail in the South East
    Community rail in the South East Sponsored by COMMUNITY RAIL IN THE SOUTH EAST Community rail is a unique and “ growing movement comprising Local railways provide vital lifelines more than 70 community rail that are invaluable, and they are a very “sustainable way to travel. partnerships (CRPs) and 1,000 volunteer groups across Britain Tim Barkley, Southeast Communities CRP that help communities get the most from their railways. It is about engaging local people at grassroots level to promote social inclusion, sustainable and healthy travel, wellbeing, economic development, and tourism. This involves working with train operators, local authorities, and other partners to highlight local needs and opportunities, ensuring communities have a voice in rail and transport development. Community rail is evidenced to contribute high levels of social, environmental, and economic value to local areas, and countless stations have been transformed into hubs at the heart of the communities they serve. Evidence also shows community rail delivering life-changing benefits for individuals and families, helping people access new opportunities through sustainable travel by rail. We are passionate about community The movement is currently looking to play a key role rail and putting stations at the heart of “ “ in the recovery of our communities post-COVID, the communities they serve, helping to helping them build back better and greener. promote sustainable and healthy travel, involve diverse groups, and support social and economic development. The South East in numbers: Andy Harrowell, South Western Railway Working along railway lines, with 14 industry partners, to engage local community communities. Partnerships stretch rail from Hertfordshire down to Kent, Sussex, and Hampshire on the Each Year Giving partnerships South Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • SCRP Line Map 2019
    Reading Morden South Hackbridge Earley East Croydon Carshalton Wallington Waddon West Croydon Winnersh Triangle St. Helier South Croydon Winnersh Sanderstead Riddlesdown Carshalton Beeches Uckfield to Oxted and Sutton Common Sutton Wokingham West Purley Oaks Upper Warlingham East Grinstead Line Sutton Belmont Crowthorne Coulsdon Purley Woldingham Woodmansterne Town Reedham Kenley Whyteleafe to Sevenoaks Sandhurst Cheam Banstead Oxted and London Whyteleafe Blackwater Ewell East Coulsdon South to London Epsom Downs Chipstead South Ashford Farnborough North Epsom Hurst Green to London International Kingswood Merstham Caterham Tonbridge to Reigate Line North Camp Ashtead Redhill to Dover and Europe to London Tadworth Edenbridge Leigh Tonbridge Ham Street Ash Leatherhead Tattenham to Kent Coast Corner Reigate Earlswood Nutfield Godstone Wanborough London Road Edenbridge Penshurst High Brooms Appledore Guildford (Guildford) Horsley Bookham Town Salfords 231,233 Tunbridge Wells Rye Effingham Lingfield Hever Frant Clandon Box Hill & Westhumble Horley Shalford Junction Wadhurst Winchelsea Dorking Dormans to Portsmouth Gatwick Airport Cowden Stonegate Gomshall Deepdene Dorking Doleham* Three Bridges East Grinstead Ashurst 28,29 Etchingham Robertsbridge Chilworth Dorking West Holmwood Betchworth 281,291,400 Three Oaks North Downs Line Battle 21 Eridge Ockley Crawley Balcombe Crowhurst Ore 279 Crowborough Warnham West St. Leonards Littlehaven Faygate* Ifield Haywards Heath Rail Line Hastings Horsham Buxted Wivelsfield St. Leonards South Downs Christ’s
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information for the Transport Committee's Meeting on 7 March on Crossrail and the Future for Rail in London
    Background information for the Transport Committee’s meeting on 7 March on Crossrail and the future for rail in London This document contains written submissions received for the Transport Committee’s review of Crossrail and the future for rail in London. Contents: Page number: Submissions received from stakeholders: 1. Crossrail 1 2. Network Rail 23 3. Travelwatch 28 4. ORR 35 5. RailFreight 37 6. TfL response to NR business plan 39 Submissions received from rail user groups and members of the public: 7. London Forum of Civic & Amenity Societies 47 8. Brent Council 49 9. Graham Larkbey 50 10. Clapham Transport User Group Submission 50 11. Simon Fisher 62 12. West London Line Group 64 13. James Ayles 67 12. East Surrey Transport Committee 69 Report for the London Assembly Transport Committee Document Number: CR-XRL-Z-RGN-CR001-50004 Document History: Version: Date: Prepared by: Checked by: Authorised by: Reason for Revision: For issue to the London Andrew 1.0 27-02-13 Luke Jouanides Sarah Johnson Assembly Transport Wolstenholme Committee This document contains proprietary information. No part of this document may be reproduced without prior written consent from the chief executive of Crossrail Ltd. Page 1 of 22 © Crossrail Limited 1 Document Title Document Number CR-XRL-Z-RGN-CR001-50004 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 2 Delivery: progress, scope, risk and schedule ........................................................ 3 2.1 Progress
    [Show full text]