FA 33 Zahid Militant Jihad

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FA 33 Zahid Militant Jihad Centre Français de Recherche sur le Renseignement FOREIGN ANALYSIS N°33 INFLUENCES OF ABU ALA MAUDUDI ON ISLAMO-JIHADI THOUGHTS OF ABDULLAH AZZAM THE FATHER OF MODERN JIHAD MOVEMENT Dr Farhan Zahid Ph D, Counter-Terrorism and Security Analyst (Pakistan). Marc Sageman, a prominent terrorism expert, describes Muslims as latecomers to modern terrorism. He further seconded that Islam like all other religions professes peace but like every other religions, Islam also has violent radical sects, voicing violent extremism on the name of religion1. David Rapoport also listed Islamist terrorism as fourth and the current wave in modern history of terrorism. He explained the wave as, “Islam is at the heart of the wave. Islamic groups have conducted the most significant, deadly, and profoundly international attacks. Equally significant, the political events providing the hope for the fourth wave originated in Islam, and the successes achieved apparently influenced terror groups elsewhere2.” Radical Islamist ideologues Abul Ala Maududi, Syed Qutb, Abdul Salam Faraj and Abu Mohammad al-Maqidisi had been producing jihadist texts since the first quarter of twentieth century but their works did not get wide prominence until the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and US involvement in that conflict. Founder of Islamist party Jamaat-e- Islami Pakistan, Abul Ala Maududi may be termed as the most prolific as far as his influence on other ideologues was concerned. Before 1979, there had been incidents involving violent Islamist organizations but their impact was minimal. Now it’s a fait accompli that it was the US role during Afghan War and material support rendered to jihadist organizations that eventually strengthened and boasted them. Four countries could be directly or indirectly involved in allowing the jihadi movement to take its roots, namely : Egypt, where the jihadi movement started during late 1960s after the execution of Syed Qutb by the hands of Jamal Nasir’s military regime; Saudi Arabia, which bankrolled the jihadi movement and granted asylum to most of Egyptian Islamist ideologues; Pakistan, where Islamist military regime of General Zia ul Haq allowed jihadis to receive training at camps in 1 Marc Sageman, Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009, p.28 2 David C Rapoport, “The Four Waves of Modern Terrorism”, Current History, (December 2001), pp. 419- 25. ___________________________________________________________________________ 21 boulevard Haussmann, 75009 Paris - France Tél. : 33 1 53 43 92 44 - Fax : 33 1 53 43 92 92 - www.cf2r.org Association régie par la loi du 1er juillet 1901 - SIRET n° 453 441 602 000 19 2 Pakistan and then fight against the Soviet forces in Afghanistan; and finally the United States, for providing training of trainers and providing necessary equipment for the violent Islamist movement. The CIA-ISI-GID troika was instrumental in training, funding, arming and facilitating not only the Afghan Islamist groups but also Arabs and other radical Muslims who flocked to Pakistan and received training at the camps established during that period.1 During Afghan War period (1979-89), the potential jihadists were provided with the best opportunity to actually implement and execute jihadist agendas. It was during that period that jihadists from Indonesia to North America had flocked to Pakistan and taken advantage to training camps in border areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan and in tribal areas of Pakistan. Islamist officials at the helm of affairs in Pakistan were too generous to include them in training programs and there they received state of art training, indeed taught first to Pakistani instructors by US trainers (training of trainers/ToT Programs). Pakistan had truly become the epicenter of Islamist radicals who flocked to the country for ‘jihad, glory and honor’. It is pertinent to note here that before Afghan War the center for Islamist movements and jihadist ideologues was Egypt, and it was from Egypt that most of stalwart jihadist turned to Pakistan. According to Steve Coll, by 1986 Afghan Cell headed by Brigadier Mohammad Yousaf of Pakistani intelligence had been able to construct a network of training camps for Afghan Islamist guerillas near Afghan border. “Between sixteen thousand and eighteen thousand fresh recruits passed through his camps and training courses each year.2”. According to one Pakistani intelligence source, “some 5,000 Saudis, 3,000 Yemenis, 2,000 Egyptians, 2,800 Algerians, 400 Tunisians, 370 Iraqis, 200 Libyans, and scores of Jordanians were fighting in Afghanistan against the Soviet forces3.”4. Those camps continued to produce fresh graduates even after Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989 and even after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. Saudi Arabia’s General Intelligence Department (GID), headed by Prince Turki al- Faisal, played a pivotal role after the Siege of Mecca incident of 1979.5 After that incident the disgruntled Saudi Wahabi jihadists had started to pose a new and crucial problem for the Kingdom. In this connection, the potentially radical Saudi youth were provided with the opportunity to participate in that war and were given preferential treatment. Keeping in view of the jihadi threat within after the Siege of Mecca incident, the Saudi GID became actively involved in the Afghan War against the Soviets, alongside CIA and ISI. The Saudis dispatched fresh recruits to Pakistan and then to facilitate them to reach at the battlefields required a wide network. In this regard, the Saudis were lucky enough to have Professor Abdullah Azzam by their side. Azzam, a former Muslim Brotherhood activist - and contemporary of Shaikh Omar Abdul Rehman (instigator of Twin Tower Bombings, 1995), Mohammad Qutb (brother of Syed Qutb), Ayman al-Zawahiri and Islambouli Brothers (main conspirators in Anwar Saadat’s assassination in 1981) - 1 Robert D Billard Jr., “Operation Cyclone: How the United States Defeated the Soviet Union”, Undergraduate Research Journal at University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Volume 3.2, October 2010 2 Steve Coll, Ghost War s: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 2001, Penguin Publisher, 2004, p.144 3 Mohammad Amir Rana, Safdar Sial, and Abdul Basit, Dynamics of Taliban Insurgency in FATA, Pakistan Institute of Peace Studies (2010), PIPS Publication, p. 13. 4 Interviews with retired intelligence officers confirmed the figures but requested for anonymity. 5 Khalid Hasan, “The Siege of Mecca”, Khalid Hasan Online, available at : http://www.khalidhasan.net/2008/10/17/the-siege-of-mecca/ 3 became a central figure and in years to come and also to become the strategic founder of Al-Qaeda1. Azzam, a professor of theology at Jeddah University, could truly be called as the father of modern day jihad movement. A Palestinian by descent, Azzam studied at prestigious Al-Azhar University, Cairo, from where he received doctorate in theology. Azzam’s credentials, social background, and zeal, were significant for making him a brand new jihadist ideologue. He moved to Peshawar, Pakistan, in 1981, and opened up Maktab-ul Khidmat (Services Office) for facilitating the arrival of radical Islamist youth in Pakistan from Arab countries. Maktab was their base camp in Peshawar. It was Maktab that later transformed into Al-Qaeda upon Azzam’s death in Peshawar in 1989.2 Azzam’s writings hold the key in painting the fresh picture of militant jihadism. Although many of his ideas were borrowed ones from the writings of earlier Islamist ideologues but Azzam’s influence was unmatched. He was himself there at the ‘base camp’ of jihad, practically professing it to ‘holy warriors’ and preaching ‘virtues’ of militant jihad against ‘infidel’ Soviets elsewhere in the world.3 Azzam’s philosophy was jihadist from the beginning and throughout his stay in Peshawar during Afghan War as facilitator of Arab mujahedeen he focused on no other issue. Altogether he co-founded three Wahabi/Salafist militant organizations during his career as jihadist. First, he was instrumental in setting the stage for Al-Qaeda, which he called Al- Qaeda al-Sulba (the solid base). His plan was to establish a platform of jihadist worldwide or we could say Jihad International. He envisioned Afghan War as the beginning of a worldwide conflict led by Islamist forces with eventual target of liberating Palestine or in simple words global jihad4. Second, he was amongst the founding members of Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas at Gaza in 1987, which he considered as the Middle Eastern wing of his Al-Qaeda al-Sulba. Shaikh Ahmed Yassin and Mahmoud Zahar were former members of Muslim Brotherhood like Azzam and espoused same jihadist tendencies. To this day Azzam’s Islamist jihad ideology is the main driving force for Hamas.5 Third, he provided seed money and laid the foundations of Lashkar-e-Taiba with Hafiz Mohammad Saeed and Professor Zafar Iqbal at Kumar province of Afghanistan in 1987, The LeT is now a formidable Wahabi/Salafist terrorist organization and a major non-state armed actor based in Pakistan6. One thing common amongst these three major terrorist organizations is Saudi financial support. Within short span these small groups have turned into serious regional and global security threats. Azzam’s militant jihadism could be seen in action by examining any Wahabi/Salafist/Deobandi Islamist organization worldwide. Whether its Nigerian Boko 1 Op. cit., Coll, p.156 2 “Profile: Abdullah Azzam”, Global Security, available at : http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/profiles/abdullah_azzam.htm 3 LCDR Youssef Aboul-Enein, “The Late Sheikh Abdullah Azzam’s Books, Part I: Strategic Leverage of the Soviet-Afghan War to Undertake Perpetual Jihad”, Center for Combating Terrorism (CTC) at West Point, 2008, p. 6. 4 LCDR Youssef Aboul-Enein, “The Late Sheikh Abdullah Azzam’s Books: Strategic Leverage of the Soviet- Afghan War to undertake Perpetual Jihad, Part-I”, Combating Terrorism Center, Guest Commentary, p.
Recommended publications
  • The Jihadi Threat: ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Beyond
    THE JIHADI THREAT ISIS, AL QAEDA, AND BEYOND The Jihadi Threat ISIS, al- Qaeda, and Beyond Robin Wright William McCants United States Institute of Peace Brookings Institution Woodrow Wilson Center Garrett Nada J. M. Berger United States Institute of Peace International Centre for Counter- Terrorism Jacob Olidort The Hague Washington Institute for Near East Policy William Braniff Alexander Thurston START Consortium, University of Mary land Georgetown University Cole Bunzel Clinton Watts Prince ton University Foreign Policy Research Institute Daniel Byman Frederic Wehrey Brookings Institution and Georgetown University Car ne gie Endowment for International Peace Jennifer Cafarella Craig Whiteside Institute for the Study of War Naval War College Harleen Gambhir Graeme Wood Institute for the Study of War Yale University Daveed Gartenstein- Ross Aaron Y. Zelin Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Washington Institute for Near East Policy Hassan Hassan Katherine Zimmerman Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy American Enterprise Institute Charles Lister Middle East Institute Making Peace Possible December 2016/January 2017 CONTENTS Source: Image by Peter Hermes Furian, www . iStockphoto. com. The West failed to predict the emergence of al- Qaeda in new forms across the Middle East and North Africa. It was blindsided by the ISIS sweep across Syria and Iraq, which at least temporarily changed the map of the Middle East. Both movements have skillfully continued to evolve and proliferate— and surprise. What’s next? Twenty experts from think tanks and universities across the United States explore the world’s deadliest movements, their strate- gies, the future scenarios, and policy considerations. This report reflects their analy sis and diverse views.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcin Styszyński PRESENT TRENDS AMONG JIHADISTS
    XI: 2014 nr 3 Marcin Styszyński PRESENT TRENDS AMONG JIHADISTS AFTER THE ARAB SPRING Post-revolutionary environment The Arab Spring created three main trends in current political Islam. The fi rst fi eld concerns offi cial Muslim parties declaring implementation of some Islamic values in legal, constitutional and social life. They resign from violence and accept politi- cal dialogue and mechanisms such as free elections, referendum or parliamentary activities. The second factor refl ects Salafi preaching and radical ideas preserving conservative traditions from the period of the Prophet Mohammad. Salafi groups are focused on their theological teaching, charity work and popularization of moral values among societies. The third category concerns jihadist organizations that dec- lare violence and fi ght against authorities and societies. They refer to the concept of takfīr (excommunication), which considers the state and the society as a sinful and atheistic group supporting immoral and corrupted governments. Moreover, the idea of takfīr is close to Al-Qaeda activities regarding violent renaissance of historic caliphate and implementation of strict sharia rules. Al-Qaeda also adapts defensive and off ensive sense of jihad to modern political context related to Western policy in the Muslim world. The victory of the Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi groups in parliamentary elections in Egypt and Tunisia in 2011, the presidency of Mohammad Mursi as 26 MARCIN STYSZYŃSKI well as control of main regions in Libya and Syria by extremist militias increased infl uences of radical Islam in post-revolutionary countries.1 However, after three years of the transition process Arab societies have changed their attitude to the crucial values of the Arab revolution such as democra- cy, freedom, liberalism or fi ght against authoritarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Kintail T Msres
    Bangor University MASTERS BY RESEARCH The innovations of radical Islam Kintail, Tessa Award date: 2017 Awarding institution: Bangor University Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 Tessa Kintail The innovations of radical Islam Thesis submitted for the degree of MARes School of Philosophy and Religion Bangor University / Prifysgol Bangor September 2017 2 Summary Islam’s leading contemporary teachers have refuted the theological principles of extremist thinking. Radicalisation experiences are increasingly heard and explored. However, a gap in countering Islamic extremism exists, which this study seeks to identify and address. Requiring authority from the texts for their actions, radical ideologues alter classical ideas to contextualise violent interpretations. This is not an organic religious evolution or adaptation of meaning to address cultural crisis, but the selective goal-based reduction and revision of God’s message.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter-Terrorism Reference Curriculum
    COUNTER-TERRORISM REFERENCE CURRICULUM CTRC Academic Project Leads & Editors Dr. Sajjan M. Gohel, International Security Director Asia Pacific Foundation Visiting Teacher, London School of Economics & Political Science [email protected] & [email protected] Dr. Peter Forster, Associate Professor Penn State University [email protected] PfPC Reference Curriculum Lead Editors: Dr. David C. Emelifeonwu Senior Staff Officer, Educational Engagements Canadian Defence Academy Associate Professor Royal Military College of Canada Department of National Defence [email protected] Dr. Gary Rauchfuss Director, Records Management Training Program National Archives and Records Administration [email protected] Layout Coordinator / Distribution: Gabriella Lurwig-Gendarme NATO International Staff [email protected] Graphics & Printing — ISBN XXXX 2010-19 NATO COUNTER-TERRORISM REFERENCE CURRICULUM Published May 2020 2 FOREWORD “With guns you can kill terrorists, with education you can kill terrorism.” — Malala Yousafzai, Pakistani activist for female education and Nobel Prize laureate NATO’s counter-terrorism efforts have been at the forefront of three consecutive NATO Summits, including the recent 2019 Leaders’ Meeting in London, with the clear political imperative for the Alliance to address a persistent global threat that knows no border, nationality or religion. NATO’s determination and solidarity in fighting the evolving challenge posed by terrorism has constantly increased since the Alliance invoked its collective defence clause for the first time in response to the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 on the United States of America. NATO has gained much experience in countering terrorism from its missions and operations. However, NATO cannot defeat terrorism on its own. Fortunately, we do not stand alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Americans Go Abroad to Fight in Foreign Conflicts?
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 2018-06 WHY DO AMERICANS GO ABROAD TO FIGHT IN FOREIGN CONFLICTS? Harris, Alphonso Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/59679 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS WHY DO AMERICANS GO ABROAD TO FIGHT IN FOREIGN CONFLICTS? by Alphonso Harris June 2018 Thesis Advisor: Mohammed M. Hafez Second Reader: Daniel T. Cunningham Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Form Approved OMB REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED (Leave blank) June 2018 Master's thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS WHY DO AMERICANS GO ABROAD TO FIGHT IN FOREIGN CONFLICTS? 6. AUTHOR(S) Alphonso Harris 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Hizbullah, Al-Qaeda, and IS. Robert Andrew Hodges
    Ideological Foundations of Jihadist Organizations: Hizbullah, al-Qaeda, and IS. Robert Andrew Hodges Thesis submitted to the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Political Science Bettina Koch Ilja Luciak Yannis Stivachtis June 27, 2017 Blacksburg, Virginia Keyword: Jihadist organization, ideology, religion, socio-political, Hizbullah, al- Qaeda, ISIS Copyright 2017, Robert Andrew Hodges Ideological Foundations of Jihadist Organizations: Hizbullah, al-Qaeda, and IS. Robert Andrew Hodges ABSTRACT This thesis explores the ideological foundations of three jihadist organizations, Hizbullah, al- Qaeda, and Islamic State (IS). All three are categorized as international terrorist organizations but their goals differ. Hizbullah seeks to alter the government within Lebanon, al-Qaeda seeks to eliminate Western influences in Muslim inhabited territories, and IS seeks to create a caliphate within a large portion of the Middle East. The similarities and differences of these three organizations will be illuminated through this examination. The primary focus of the examination focuses on their religious teachings and discourse, as this is a critical aspect of their ideologies. Through this examination, the differences in discourse coinciding with the differing goals of each organization is presented. The discourse of each organization facilitates their goals, recruitment of fighters, and explanation of their actions. Self/other identification is a commonality of all three ideologies but the identification of the other is different according to each organizations goals. This thesis will highlight this aspect and allow for further discussion of the three organizations in future research. The conclusion will allow for discussion as to who gains and maintains power and whether religion is a base or merely a tool for this power.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography of Sheikh Abdullah Azzam (Shaheed)
    DEFENCE OF THE MUSLIM LANDS The First Obligation After Iman Biography of Sheikh Abdullah Azzam (Shaheed) Abdullah Yusuf Azzam was born in a village in the North of Palestine named Selat AI Harithia in Genine District in the year 1941. His father's name was Mustafa Azzam who died a year after his son was assassinated. His mother was Zakia Saleh who died one year before the Sheikh was killed. She was buried in Pabi camp. The Azzam family is a well-known family, one of its members being Sheikh Abdullah Azzam, distinguished as a child, who started making Da'wah at an early age. He was already showing signs of excellence and was recognised by his teachers while he was in elementary school. His peers knew him as a pious child. Since he was a small boy he was known for his determination and serious dispositions. Before he had even come of age, he joined the Muslim Brotherhood. Sheikh Abdullah Azzam received his early elementary and secondary school education in his village, and continued his education at the agricultural Khadorri College where he obtained a Diploma. Although he was the youngest amongst his colleagues, he was the brigbtest and most astute. After he graduated from Khadorri College, he worked as a teacher in a village named Adder in the South of Jordan. Later he joined Shariah College in Damascus University where he obtained a B.A. Degree in Shariah in 1966. After the Jews captured the West Bank in 1967, Sheikh Abdullah Azzam decided to migrate to Jordan, because he could not live under the Jewish occupation of Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Radical Islam and Effectiveness of Counter-Terrorism in a Global Age Written by Zaki Mehta
    The Rise of Radical Islam and Effectiveness of Counter-Terrorism in a Global Age Written by Zaki Mehta This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. The Rise of Radical Islam and Effectiveness of Counter- Terrorism in a Global Age https://www.e-ir.info/2011/09/20/the-rise-of-radical-islam-and-effectiveness-of-counter-terrorism-in-a-global-age/ ZAKI MEHTA, SEP 20 2011 Terrorism, one may argue, has existed for as long as man himself. Regardless of its aims, terrorism has throughout time continually changed in form due to ever changing factors such as; the perpetrators, means, motivation and the victims. Subsequently so have the methods with which to counter terrorism. Since the beginning of the twenty-first century there has been a stark shift in the global perception of terrorism and its cause. As a consequence of such a shift it is fair to say that there has been a direct change in the measures taken in order to halt terrorism. This dissertation seeks to discuss the origins and rise of radical Islam as the new so called ‘terror’ and the subsequent development and transition of counter-terrorism in the post September 11th 2001 period. Specifically, this essay seeks to discuss the development of counter-terrorism in relation to the pivotal concept of radical Islam. Rightly or wrongly radical Islam is perceived as the modern day global ‘terror’ and it will be used in this dissertation in order to assess the evolution of counter-terrorism in the twenty first century.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Willthesisfinaldraft3.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTIONS OF AL QAEDA AND ISIS: UNDERSTANDING THE RISE OF RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM ISAAC WILL SPRING 2019 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in History and Political Science with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: David Atwill Professor of History Thesis Supervisor Cathleen Cahill Professor of History Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Having emerged only in the last century, radical Islamic terrorism is a relatively new phenomenon. This especially holds true in the world of academia where the study is far too often emotionally driven, sensationalistic, reliant on secondary sources, or focused on organizations only at their operational peak. As a result, radical Islamic terrorism has remained difficult to genuinely understand. This work seeks to further a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon through an analysis of the origins and evolutions of both Al Qaeda and ISIS – two of the most salient terror organizations to arise in the modern era. Specific attention is paid to the development of each organization’s operational objectives throughout their foundational years. After examining the environments in which they arose, the various leaders who oriented them, and the circumstances that shaped their enemies and objectives, a number of findings come to light. Radical Islamic terror organizations are not monolithic. They often vary in the most fundamental ways, a fact exemplified well through a dual analysis of Al Qaeda and ISIS. Nonetheless, a number of overarching trends can be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Bachelor Thesis: Peace and Development Studies
    Bachelor thesis: Peace and Development Studies The rise of militancy in the Muslim youth Discourse analysis of recruitment tactics of militant groups in Pakistan for inciting youth to violence after 9/11. Student: Abdul Sayed Tutor: Manuela Nilsson (Ph.D.) Course code: 2FU31E Semester: Fall, 2016. Dept.: Peace and Development Studies Faculty: Social Studies University: Linnaeus University, Växjö. Date: 2017-01-09. Abstract This study is focused on the spreading wave of militancy in the Muslim youth after 9/11 era. The role Al Qaeda is researched in understanding this problem in the case study of Pakistan. Al Qaeda is considered as the nursery for the rising of militancy in the Muslims while Pakistan is the birthplace of Al Qaeda. The problem of militancy rose to the alarming level in Pakistan after 9/11 when the Pakistani state started to support the US in the war against terror which Al Qaeda and other Islamists consider as the war against Islam. The recruitment strategies of Al Qaeda and other Pakistani militant groups like Tihreak Taliban Pakistan (TTP or Pakistani Taliban movement) are studied through the discourse analysis. The primary data from the militant sources like the speeches, books and interviews of their leadership and ideologues, their official magazines and press releases are selected for this research. All this data is available in Urdu language which is translated to the English for this research. The theoretical framework of this research is based on the “Soft theory” of Josef Nye (2006) and the “three dimensions of Power” theory of Steven Lukes (2005). The results of this research show that the militants mostly use different types of arguments in their messages to the youth in their efforts for recruiting them to the path of militancy which include mostly the religious arguments.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENCE of the MUSLIM LANDS the First Obligation After Iman by Sheikh Abdullah Azzam (Shaheed)
    DEFENCE OF THE MUSLIM LANDS The First Obligation After Iman by Sheikh Abdullah Azzam (Shaheed) Table of Contents Biography of Sheikh Abdullah Azzam (Shaheed). Introduction Chapter 1 Defence of the Muslim Lands. The First Obligation After Iman. Jihad Against the Kuffar is of Two Types. Opinions of the Mathhabs. Evidence for the General March and its Justi!cation. Chapter 2 The Ruling of Fighting in Palestine and Afghanistan. Jihad in Afghanistan. Chapter 3 Fard Ayn and Fard Kifaya Permission from Parents, Husband and Creditor . An Example ofFard Ayn and Fard Kifaya. Permission from the Sheikh and Tutor. Jihad with One's Wealth. Summary. Chapter 4 Important Questions. Can we ful!l this Fatwa? About Permission. First Question: How can we apply the General March practically in our time? Second Question: Can we !ght Jihad while we haven't an Amir? Third Question: Can we !ght in Afghanistan while the leaders are separated? Fourth Question: Does one !ght alone if the rest stay behind? Fifth Question: Do we !ght alongside Muslims that are below acceptable levels of Islamic education? Sixth Question: Can we seek help from the Mushrikun if we are weak? The Revelation of the Order to Fight. Conditions for Making Peace Treaties with Kuffar . Final Word. Letters of Acknowledgement. Translators Note and Hadith References. Go to: Table of contents --- this page Biography of Abdullah Azzam and Introduction Chapter 1 Defence of the Muslims Lands Chapter 2 The Ruling of Fighting in Palestine and Afghanistan Chapter 3 Fard Ayn and Fard Kifaya Chapter 4 Important questions Final Word Letters of Acknowledgement and Translators Note [top] ©2002 Religioscope unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Al-Qaeda After the Death of Bin Laden
    THE FUTURE OF AL-QAEDA AFTER THE DEATH OF BIN LADEN: FIGHTING TERRORISM By Roman Kalina Submitted to Central European University Department of Public Policy in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Public Policy Supervisor: Professor Evelyne Patrizia Hübscher CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2012 Abstract Death of the leader of terrorist group al-Qaeda Osama bin Laden on May 2, 2011, was celebrated by the Americans as a final defeat of the terrorism and al-Qaeda. In fact al-Qaeda is a group with the flexible structure, where the core leadership nowadays has only a symbolic value, and therefore death of bin Laden will not cause the damage to the group. More dangerous are the second and third elements of al-Qaeda hierarchy, which act upon the ideology, which was set by Osama bin Laden and his close associates. The main aim for the United States’ counterterrorist strategy therefore would be to not target the leader of the group, but to target the ideology of al-Qaeda as a whole. By discrediting the ideology of the group, al-Qaeda will lose the support of the public, which is the core strength of the group. The loss of support will lead to the defeat of al-Qaeda. CEU eTD Collection i Acknowledgments I am thankful to my supervisor Professor Evelyne Patrizia Hübscher, who had given me valuable advices on how to structure my paper and which direction should my project go. I would also like to thank Professor Nikolai Sitter for inspiration, providing sources, and for introducing me to the interesting subject of terrorism.
    [Show full text]