Marine Ecology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marine Ecology Chapter 12: Marine Ecology URS-EIA-REP-204635 Table of Contents 12 Marine Ecology ......................................................................................... 12-1 12.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 12-1 12.2 Scoping ............................................................................................................ 12-1 12.3 Spatial and Temporal Boundaries ........................................................................ 12-2 12.3.1 Project Phases ..................................................................................... 12-2 12.3.2 Project Boundaries ............................................................................... 12-2 12.3.2.1 Project Area ................................................................................. 12-2 12.3.2.2 Study Area ................................................................................... 12-3 12.3.2.3 Survey Areas ................................................................................ 12-4 12.3.3 Baseline Data ....................................................................................... 12-4 12.3.3.1 Secondary Data ............................................................................ 12-4 12.3.3.2 Data Gaps .................................................................................... 12-5 12.3.3.3 Primary Data / Baseline Surveys .................................................... 12-5 12.3.4 Data Assumptions and Limitations ....................................................... 12-19 12.4 Baseline Characteristics ................................................................................... 12-19 12.4.1 Black Sea Overview ............................................................................ 12-19 12.4.2 Plankton ............................................................................................ 12-22 12.4.2.1 Background ................................................................................ 12-22 12.4.2.2 Plankton Survey.......................................................................... 12-22 12.4.2.3 Summary ................................................................................... 12-31 12.4.3 Benthic communities .......................................................................... 12-32 12.4.3.1 Background and Literature Review ............................................... 12-32 12.4.3.2 Survey ....................................................................................... 12-35 12.4.3.3 Summary ................................................................................... 12-57 12.4.4 Deep Sea Benthic Habitats .................................................................. 12-57 12.4.5 Fish ................................................................................................... 12-58 12.4.5.1 Background and Literature Review ............................................... 12-58 12.4.5.2 Survey ....................................................................................... 12-65 12.4.5.3 Summary ................................................................................... 12-72 12.4.6 Seabirds ............................................................................................ 12-73 12.4.6.1 Background and Literature Review ............................................... 12-73 12.4.6.2 Survey ....................................................................................... 12-75 12.4.6.3 Summary ................................................................................... 12-87 12.4.7 Marine mammals ................................................................................ 12-88 12.4.7.1 Background and Literature Review ............................................... 12-88 12.4.7.2 Survey ........................................................................................ 12-91 12.4.7.3 Summary .................................................................................. 12-100 12.4.8 Protected Areas and Species ............................................................. 12-101 12.4.8.1 Protected Areas ........................................................................ 12-101 12.4.8.2 Protected Species ..................................................................... 12-108 12.4.9 Critical Habitat ................................................................................. 12-109 12.4.9.1 Overview .................................................................................. 12-109 URS-EIA-REP-204635 i Chapter 12 Marine Ecology 12.4.9.2 Critical Habitat for Endangered Species ...................................... 12-110 12.4.9.3 Critical Habitat for Migratory and Congregatory Species .............. 12-110 12.5 Impact Assessment ....................................................................................... 12-111 12.5.1 Impact Assessment Methodology ...................................................... 12-111 12.5.1.1 Impact Assessment Criteria ....................................................... 12-113 12.5.1.2 Modelling Undertaken ............................................................... 12-121 12.5.2 Assessment of Impacts: Construction and Pre-Commissioning ............. 12-121 12.5.2.1 Introduction ............................................................................. 12-121 12.5.2.2 Assessment of Potential Impacts (Pre-Mitigation)........................ 12-123 12.5.2.3 Mitigation and Monitoring .......................................................... 12-135 12.5.2.4 Residual Impacts: Construction and Pre-Commissioning .............. 12-139 12.5.3 Assessment of Impacts: Commissioning and Operational Phase .......... 12-146 12.5.3.1 Introduction ............................................................................. 12-146 12.5.3.2 Assessment of Potential Impacts (Pre-Mitigation)........................ 12-146 12.5.3.3 Mitigation and Monitoring .......................................................... 12-147 12.5.3.4 Residual Impacts: Commissioning and Operational Phase ............ 12-147 12.5.4 Assessment of Impacts: Decommissioning Phase ............................... 12-149 12.5.4.1 Introduction ............................................................................. 12-149 12.5.4.2 Assessment of Potential Impacts (Pre-Mitigation) ........................ 12-149 12.5.4.3 Mitigation and Monitoring .......................................................... 12-150 12.6 Unplanned Events ......................................................................................... 12-151 12.7 Cumulative Impacts ....................................................................................... 12-152 12.8 Conclusions................................................................................................... 12-152 ii URS-EIA-REP-204635 Tables Table 12.1 Marine Ecology Surveys (2009-2011) ................................................................ 12-6 Table 12.2 Marine Benthic Ecology, Marine Mammal and Seabird Surveys July 2013 ........... 12-11 Table 12.3 Survey Methodologies .................................................................................... 12-14 Table 12.4 Taxonomic Composition of Phytoplankton ....................................................... 12-25 Table 12.5 Abundance of Dominant Phytoplankton Taxa in November 2010 and April 2011 Surveys ......................................................................................................................... 12-26 Table 12.6 Zooplankton Species Observed in 2010 and 2011 ............................................ 12-28 Table 12.7 Macroalgae Species Observed Listed in Red Data Book of Krasnodar Krai (August 2011) ............................................................................................................................ 12-39 Table 12.8 Abundance and Biomass of Dominant Species in May to June 2009 Survey ....... 12-41 Table 12.9 Abundance And Species Richness by Sediment Type in July 2013 Survey Samples ........................................................................................................................ 12-44 Table 12.10 Average Abundance of Species Present in Sand Samples ................................ 12-45 Table 12.11 Average Abundance of Top 10 Species Present in Mixed Sediment Samples ..... 12-46 Table 12.12 Average abundance of Top 10 Species Present in Coarse Sediment Samples ... 12-46 Table 12.13 Average Abundance of Top 10 Species Present in Mud Sediment Samples ....... 12-47 Table 12.14 Marine Habitats Identified During the July 2013 Survey ................................. 12-49 Table 12.15 Species of Conservation Interest Observed in the North Eastern Black Sea Region .................................................................................................................................... 12-60 Table 12.16 Species Composition, Abundance and Weight from Fish Trawls (November 2010) ............................................................................................................................ 12-69 Table 12.17 Fish Species Observed in Trawl and Gillnet Surveys (April - June 2011) ........... 12-71 Table 12.18 Seabird and Coastal Species Groups in North-Eastern Black Sea Region (Ref. 12.1) .................................................................................................................................... 12-73 Table 12.19 Seabird Species Observed
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Aquatic Organisms and Ecosystems
    Ca. 30m Ca.200m TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES No. 172 Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Aquatic Organisms and Ecosystems 0 í J INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1 976 EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION ON AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND ECOSYSTEMS The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES ALBANIA HUNGARY POLAND ALGERIA ICELAND PORTUGAL ARGENTINA INDIA REPUBLIC OF AUSTRALIA INDONESIA SOUTH VIET-NAM AUSTRIA IRAN ROMANIA BANGLADESH IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA BELGIUM IRELAND SENEGAL BOLIVIA ISRAEL SIERRA LEONE BRAZIL ITALY SINGAPORE BULGARIA IVORY COAST SOUTH AFRICA BURMA JAMAICA SPAIN BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET JAPAN SRI LANKA SOCIALIST REPUBLIC JORDAN SUDAN CAMBODIA KENYA SWEDEN CANADA KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SWITZERLAND CHILE KUWAIT SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COLOMBIA LEBANON THAILAND COSTA RICA LIBERIA TUNISIA CUBA LIBYAN ARAB REPUBLIC TURKEY CYPRUS LIECHTENSTEIN UGANDA CZECHOSLOVAKIA LUXEMBOURG UKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S MADAGASCAR REPUBLIC REPUBLIC OF KOREA MALAYSIA UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST DENMARK MALI REPUBLICS DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MAURITIUS UNITED ARAB EMIRATES ECUADOR MEXICO UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT EGYPT MONACO BRITAIN AND NORTHERN EL SALVADOR MONGOLIA IRELAND ETHIOPIA MOROCCO UNITED REPUBLIC OF FINLAND NETHERLANDS CAMEROON FRANCE NEW ZEALAND UNITED REPUBLIC OF GABON NIGER TANZANIA GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC NIGERIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NORWAY URUGUAY GHANA PAKISTAN VENEZUELA GREECE PANAMA YUGOSLAVIA GUATEMALA PARAGUAY ZAIRE HAITI PERU ZAMBIA The Agency's Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957. The Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna. Its principal objective is "to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world".
    [Show full text]
  • May 2002. the Internet Journal
    Vol. 5 / No. 1 Published by Friends of the Monk Seal May 2002 Guest Editorial: The plight of the monk seal Henrique Costa Neves reflects on the monk seal’s remarkable recovery in Madeira after centuries of persecution and near-extinction. International News Hawaiian News Mediterranean News Cover Story: Endgame – the fight for marine protected areas in Turkey by Cem. O. Kiraç and Yalcin Savas. In Focus: Homeward Bound – are monk seals returning to Madeira’s São Lourenço Peninsula? by Alexandros A. Karamanlidis, Rosa Pires, Henrique Costa Neves and Carlos Santos. Guest Editorial: Sun basking seals on Madeira’s Desertas Islands Perspectives: Challenge in the Ionian An interview with Ioannis D. Pantis, President of the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Monachus Science: Bree, P.J.H. van. Notes on the description and the type material of the Hawaiian monk seal or Laysan Seal, Monachus schauinslandi Matschie, 1905. Kiraç, C.O., Y. Savas, H. Güçlüsoy & N.O. Veryeri. Observations on diving behaviour of free ranging Mediterranean monk seals Monachus monachus on Turkish coasts. Monachus Science Posters: Cover Story: MPAs in Turkey – in desperate need of management Androukaki E., E. Fatsea, L. 't Hart, A.D.M.E. Osterhaus, E. Tounta, S. Kotomatas. Growth and development of Mediterranean monk seal pups during rehabilitation. 16th European Cetacean Society Conference, Liège, Belgium, 7-11 April, 2002. Dosi, A., S. Adamantopoulou, P. Dendrinos, S. Kotomatas, E. Tounta, & E. Androukaki. Analysis of heavy metals in blubber and skin of Mediterranean monk seals. 16th European Cetacean Society Conference, Liège, Belgium, 7-11 April, 2002. Letters to the Editor Including – Killing sharks at French Frigate Shoals is unacceptable, by Ian L.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
    A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, Systematics
    A Dissertation Entitled Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) By Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) ____________________________________ Adviser: Dr. Carol A. Stepien ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Christine M. Mayer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Elliot J. Tramer ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. David J. Jude ____________________________________ Committee Member: Dr. Juan L. Bouzat ____________________________________ College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2009 Copyright © 2009 This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. _______________________________________________________________________ An Abstract of Evolution, systematics, and phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian gobies (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei) Matthew E. Neilson Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for The Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology (Ecology) The University of Toledo December 2009 The study of biodiversity, at multiple hierarchical levels, provides insight into the evolutionary history of taxa and provides a framework for understanding patterns in ecology. This is especially poignant in invasion biology, where the prevalence of invasiveness in certain taxonomic groups could
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an Updated Checklist
    1 2 Marine fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an updated checklist 3 4 5 RAFAEL BAÑON1, DAVID VILLEGAS-RÍOS2, ALBERTO SERRANO3, 6 GONZALO MUCIENTES2,4 & JUAN CARLOS ARRONTE3 7 8 9 10 1 Servizo de Planificación, Dirección Xeral de Recursos Mariños, Consellería de Pesca 11 e Asuntos Marítimos, Rúa do Valiño 63-65, 15703 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. E- 12 mail: [email protected] 13 2 CSIC. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas. Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo 14 (Pontevedra), Spain. E-mail: [email protected] (D. V-R); [email protected] 15 (G.M.). 16 3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. de Santander, Santander, Spain. E-mail: 17 [email protected] (A.S); [email protected] (J.-C. A). 18 4Centro Tecnológico del Mar, CETMAR. Eduardo Cabello s.n., 36208. Vigo 19 (Pontevedra), Spain. 20 21 Abstract 22 23 An annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Galician waters is presented. The list 24 is based on historical literature records and new revisions. The ichthyofauna list is 25 composed by 397 species very diversified in 2 superclass, 3 class, 35 orders, 139 1 1 families and 288 genus. The order Perciformes is the most diverse one with 37 families, 2 91 genus and 135 species. Gobiidae (19 species) and Sparidae (19 species) are the 3 richest families. Biogeographically, the Lusitanian group includes 203 species (51.1%), 4 followed by 149 species of the Atlantic (37.5%), then 28 of the Boreal (7.1%), and 17 5 of the African (4.3%) groups. We have recognized 41 new records, and 3 other records 6 have been identified as doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Annelida Polychaeta in Gulf of Oran (Western Algerian Coastline)
    Zoodiversity, 55(4): 307–316, 2021 DOI 10.15407/zoo2021.04.307 UDC 595.142(1-15:65) INVENTORY OF ANNELIDA POLYCHAETA IN GULF OF ORAN (WESTERN ALGERIAN COASTLINE) A. Kerfouf1, A. Baaloudj2*, F. Kies1,3, K. Belhadj Tahar1, F. Denis4 1Laboratory of Eco-development of Spaces, University of Djillali Liabes, Sidi Bel Abbes, 22000, Algeria 2Laboratory of Biology, Water and Environment, University of 8 May 1945, Guelma 24000, Algeria 3Earth and Environmental Sciences Department, Università Degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy 4Marine Biology Station (MNHN), UMR 7208 ‘BOREA’, 29182, Concarneau, France *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]; baaloudj.aff [email protected] A. Baaloudj (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6932-0905) Inventory of Annelida Polychaeta in Gulf of Oran (Western Algerian Coastline). Kerfouf, A., Baaloudj, A., Kies, F., Belhadj Tahar, K. Denis, F. — Bionomical research on the continental shelf of the Oran‘s Gulf enabled us to study the Annelida macrofauna. Sampling sites were selected according to the bathymetry, which was divided into eight transects. Collected samples with the Aberdeen grab separated the Polychaeta Annelids from other zoological groups. 1571 Annelida Polychaeta were inventoried and determined by the species, including ten orders (Amphinomida, Capitellida, Eunicida, Flabelligerida, Ophelida, Oweniida, Phyllodocidae, Sabellida, Spionida, Terebellidae), 24 families, 84 genus and 74 species. Th e analyzed taxa highlighted the dominant and main species on the bottom of the Gulf, including Hyalinoecia bilineata, which appeared as the major species, Eunice vittata, Chone duneri, Glycera convoluta, Hyalinocea fauveli, Pista cristata, Lumbrinerris fragilis and Chloeia venusta. Key words: Annelida, Polychaeta, continental shelf, Gulf of Oran., macrofauna, Hyalinoecia bilineata.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Sagittae Otoliths of Mediterranean Sea Gobies
    Manuscript 1 Identifying sagittae otoliths of Mediterranean Sea gobies: 2 variability among phylogenetic lineages 3 4 5 A. LOMBARTE *† , M. MILETIĆ ‡, M. KOVAČIĆ §, J. L. OTERO -F ERRER ∏ AND V. M. TUSET * 6 7 *Institut de Ciències del Mar-CSIC, Passeig Marítim 37-48, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, 8 Spain, 9 ‡ Energy Institute Hrvoje Pozar, Savska cesta 163, 10001 Zagreb, Croatia, 10 §Natural History Museum Rijeka, Lorenzov prolaz 1HR-51000, Rijeka, Croatia, 11 ∏Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Campus Universitario 12 de Vigo, Fonte das Ab elleiras, s/n 36310, Vigo, Gali za, Spain 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 †Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: +34 932309564; email: 25 [email protected] 1 26 Gobiidae is the most species rich teleost family in the Mediterranean Sea, where this family is 27 characterized by high taxonomic complexity. Gobies are also an important but often- 28 underestimated part of coastal marine food webs. In this study, we describe and analyse the 29 morphology of the sagittae, the largest otoliths, of 25 species inhabiting the Adriatic and 30 northwestern Mediterranean seas. Our goal was to test the usefulness and efficiency of 31 sagittae otoliths for species identification. Our analysis of otolith contours was based on 32 mathematical descriptors called wavelets, which are related to multi-scale decompositions of 33 contours. Two methods of classification were used: an iterative system based on 10 wavelets 34 that searches the Anàlisi de Formes d'Otòlits (AFORO) database, and a discriminant method 35 based only on the fifth wavelet.
    [Show full text]
  • Определение Длины, При Которой Наступает Половая Зрелость У Черноморского Калкана (Scophthalmus Maeotica Maeotica)
    71 УДК 597.587.9.36(262.5) ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ДЛИНЫ, ПРИ КОТОРОЙ НАСТУПАЕТ ПОЛОВАЯ ЗРЕЛОСТЬ У ЧЕРНОМОРСКОГО КАЛКАНА (SCOPHTHALMUS MAEOTICA MAEOTICA) М. М. Пятинский, инж. I кат. Керченский филиал («ЮгНИРО») ФГБНУ «АзНИИРХ» e-mail: [email protected] Исследуются особенности полового созревания черноморского калкана Scophthalmus maeotica maeotica (Pallas, 1814). Определена длина, при которой калкан достигает половой зрелости, при помощи пробит-метода на основе функции максимального правдоподобия в программной среде R. Пробит-анализу были подвергнуты две выборки размером 199 и 102 особи. Между выборками не были обнаружены статистические различия, данные были объединены. Длина самок, при которой 50 % особей достигли половой зрелости, составила 39,8 (37,5 ÷ 41,2) см. Самцы созревают раньше самок при длине меньшей, чем 35 см. Полученные результаты статистически значимы (при уровне 2 значимости P = 0,95), проверка выполнена при помощи критерия . Действующая мера промыслового размера (40 см) является адекватной и препятствует вылову неполовозрелых особей. Ключевые слова: черноморский калкан, Scophthalmus maeotica, пробит, статистика, нормальное распределение, длина, созревание, регрессионный анализ, Черное море ВВЕДЕНИЕ Черноморский калкан Scophthalmus maeotica maeotica (Pallas, 1814) [9] является одним из цен- ных видов рыб Черного моря. Этот вид является важным объектом промысла в Черном море и вслед- ствие высокого многолетнего пресса рыболовства [4] нуждается в изучении и регулировании про- мысла. Основная цель данной работы – определение длины, при которой черноморский калкан до- стигает половой зрелости. Зависимость длины и наступления полового созревания у рыб давно вызывает интерес у иссле- дователей ввиду практического и научного интереса. Обычно исследователи принимали за длину созревания минимальную длину половозрелой особи. Однако такая характеристика не является на- дежной, полученные таким способом данные имеют большое расхождение и не обладают статисти- ческой точностью.
    [Show full text]
  • Download and Streaming), and Products (Analytics and Indexes)
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 53RD EUROPEAN MARINE BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM OOSTENDE, BELGIUM 17-21 SEPTEMBER 2018 This publication should be quoted as follows: Mees, J.; Seys, J. (Eds.) (2018). Book of abstracts – 53rd European Marine Biology Symposium. Oostende, Belgium, 17-21 September 2018. VLIZ Special Publication, 82. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee - Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ): Oostende. 199 pp. Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee (VLIZ) – Flanders Marine Institute InnovOcean site, Wandelaarkaai 7, 8400 Oostende, Belgium Tel. +32-(0)59-34 21 30 – Fax +32-(0)59-34 21 31 E-mail: [email protected] – Website: http://www.vliz.be The abstracts in this book are published on the basis of the information submitted by the respective authors. The publisher and editors cannot be held responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in this book of abstracts. Reproduction is authorized, provided that appropriate mention is made of the source. ISSN 1377-0950 Table of Contents Keynote presentations Engelhard Georg - Science from a historical perspective: 175 years of change in the North Sea ............ 11 Pirlet Ruth - The history of marine science in Belgium ............................................................................... 12 Lindeboom Han - Title of the keynote presentation ................................................................................... 13 Obst Matthias - Title of the keynote presentation ...................................................................................... 14 Delaney Jane - Title
    [Show full text]
  • Lütfiye ERYILMAZ* and Cem DALYAN
    ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2015) 45 (2): 181–188 DOI: 10.3750/AIP2015.45.2.08 AGE, GROWTH, AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF TURBOT, SCOPHTHALMUS MAXIMUS (ACTINOPTERYGII: PLEURONECTIFORMES: SCOPHTHALMIDAE), FROM THE SOUTH-WESTERN COASTS OF BLACK SEA, TURKEY Lütfi ye ERYILMAZ* and Cem DALYAN Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey Eryilmaz L., Dalyan C. 2015. Age, growth, and reproductive biology of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (Actinopterygii: Pleuronectiformes: Scophthalmidae), from the south-western coasts of Black Sea, Turkey. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 45 (2): 181–188. Background. The turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (Linnaeus, 1758), is of high economical value in Turkey and its biological characteristics have hitherto not been studied in the South-western Black Sea. The purpose of this study was to determine the age and growth, length–weight relation, condition factor, sex ratio, age and length at fi rst maturity, and reproduction period of the turbot in the south-western Black Sea coast of Turkey. Materials and methods. Turbots were collected monthly in the south-western Black Sea coast of Turkey using bottom trawl and turbot gillnets. The fi sh samples were obtained between October 2004 and September 2005. Results. A total of 264 turbots were sampled and the age groups ranged from I to X (no individuals found at age group IX). Total lengths were between 14.0 and 70.0 cm, while weights varied from 34 to 5550 g. The length–we- ight relation for combined sexes was determined as W = 0.0085L3.1581. The von Bertalanffy growth equation para- –1 meters were: L = 73.55 cm, k = 0.17 year , t0 = –0.12 year.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Structure and Habitat Preferences of Intertidal Fishes of the Eastern Canary Islands: Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1996 Community Structure and Habitat Preferences of Intertidal Fishes of the Eastern Canary Islands: Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, and Lanzarote, With a Behavioral Description of Mauligobius Maderensis (Osteichthyes: Gobiidae). Richard Patrick Cody Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Cody, Richard Patrick, "Community Structure and Habitat Preferences of Intertidal Fishes of the Eastern Canary Islands: Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, and Lanzarote, With a Behavioral Description of Mauligobius Maderensis (Osteichthyes: Gobiidae)." (1996). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6180. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6180 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]