Vol 29 #2.Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vol 29 #2.Final $5.00 (Free to Members) Vol. 33, No. 3 July 2005 FREMONTIA A JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY IN THIS ISSUE: CHAPTERS OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: INSTALLMENT III 3 THE CNPS CONSERVATION PROGRAM by David Chipping 10 CNPS VEGETATION PROGRAM: A FRESH LOOK BACK AND A NEW LOOK FORWARD by Todd Keeler-Wolf and Julie M. Evens 18 THE CONSERVATION OF TWO SONOMA COUNTY MANZANITAS by Greg Wahlert and Phil Van Soelen 24 IN MEMORIAM: SCOTT SUNDBERG, 1954-2004 by Aaron Liston 31 VOLUME 33:3, JULY 2005 FREMONTIA 1 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF CNPS CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY FREMONTIA CNPS, 2707 K Street, Suite 1; Sacramento, CA 95816-5113 (916) 447-CNPS (2677) Fax: (916) 447-2727 VOL. 33, NO. 3, JULY 2005 [email protected] Copyright © 2005 MEMBERSHIP California Native Plant Society Membership form located on inside back cover; dues include subscriptions to Fremontia and the Bulletin Linda Ann Vorobik, Editor Mariposa Lily . $1,000 Supporting . $75 Bob Hass, Copy Editor Benefactor . $500 Family, Group, International . $45 Beth Hansen-Winter, Designer Patron . $250 Individual or Library . $35 Vivian Parker, Jake Sigg & Plant Lover . $100 Student/Retired/Limited Income . $20 David Tibor, Proofreaders STAFF CHAPTER COUNCIL CALIFORNIA NATIVE CALIFORNIA NATIVE Sacramento Office: Alta Peak (Tulare) . Joan Stewart PLANT SOCIETY Executive Director . Pamela C. Bristlecone (Inyo-Mono) . Sherryl Taylor Muick, PhD Channel Islands . Lynne Kada Dedicated to the Preservation of Development Director . Cari Porter Dorothy King Young (Mendocino/ the California Native Flora Membership Assistant . Christina Sonoma Coast) . Jon Thompson The California Native Plant Society Neifer East Bay . Joe Willingham (CNPS) is a statewide nonprofit orga- Finance Manager . Lois El Dorado . Amy Hoffman nization dedicated to increasing the Cunningham Kern County . Laura Stockton Los Angeles/Santa Monica Mtns . understanding and appreciation of Bookkeeper . Suzanne DaVirro California’s native plants, and to pre- Betsey Landis serving them and their natural habi- At Large: Marin County . Bob Soost Milo Baker (Sonoma County) . tats for future generations. Fremontia Editor . Linda Ann Reny Parker CNPS carries out its mission Vorobik, PhD Mojave Desert . Tim Thomas through science, conservation advo- Senior Conservation Botanist . Monterey Bay . Robert Hale cacy, education, and horticulture at Ileene Anderson Mount Lassen . Jim Bishop the local, state, and federal levels. It Rare Plant Botanist . Misa Ward Napa Valley . Marcie Danner monitors rare and endangered plants North Coast . Larry Levine Senior Vegetation Ecologist . Julie and habitats; acts to save endangered North San Joaquin . Gail Clark areas through publicity, persuasion, Evens Orange County . Sarah Jayne and on occasion, legal action; pro- Vegetation Ecologist . Anne Klein Redbud (Grass Valley/Auburn) . vides expert testimony to government East Bay Conservation Analyst . Marie Bain bodies; supports the establishment of Jessica Jean Olsen Riverside/San Bernardino counties . native plant preserves; sponsors work- Legislative Advocate . Katie Barrows Sacramento Valley . Diana Hickson days to remove invasive plants; and Vern Goehring San Diego . Dave Flietner offers a range of educational activities Legal Advisor . Sandy McCoy including speaker programs, field trips, San Gabriel Mtns . Lyn McAfee Website Coordinator . native plant sales, horticultural work- San Luis Obispo . Charles Blair Sanhedrin (Ukiah) . Chuck Williams shops, and demonstration gardens. John Donaghue Bulletin Editor . vacant Santa Clara Valley . Judy Fenerty Since its founding in 1965, the tra- Santa Cruz County . Casey Stewman ditional strength of CNPS has been BOARD OF DIRECTORS Sequoia (Fresno) . Warren Shaw its dedicated volunteers. CNPS ac- Shasta . Dave DuBose tivities are organized at the local chap- David Diaz, Vern Goehring, Steve Sierra Foothills (Tuolumne, Cala- ter level where members’ varied in- Hartman (Treasurer), Diana Hickson, veras, Mariposa) . Patrick Stone terests influence what is done. Volun- Lynn Houser, Lynne Kada, David L. South Coast (Palos Verdes) . teers from the 32 CNPS chapters an- Magney, Sandy McCoy (Vice Pres- Barbara Sattler nually contribute in excess of 87,000 ident), J. Spence McIntyre, Carol Tahoe . Michael Hogan hours (equivalent to 42 full-time em- Witham (President) Willis L. Jepson (Solano) . ployees). Allison Fleck CNPS membership is open to all. PROGRAM DIRECTORS Yerba Buena (San Francisco) . Mark Heath Members receive the quarterly jour- CNPS Press . Holly Forbes nal, Fremontia, the quarterly statewide and Gail Milliken MATERIALS FOR Bulletin, and newsletters from their Conservation . David Chipping PUBLICATION local CNPS chapter. Horticulture . Peigi Duvall CNPS members and others are wel- Fremontia logo (by L.A. Vorobik) re- Posters . Bertha McKinley come to contribute materials for pub- printed from The Jepson Manual, J. and Wilma Follette lication in Fremontia. See the inside Hickman, Ed., 1993, with permission Rare Plants . Ann Howald back cover for manuscript submission from the Jepson Herbarium, UC. © Re- Vegetation . .Todd Keeler-Wolf instructions. gents of the University of California. Printed by Business Point Impressions, Concord, CA VOLUMEFREMONTIA 33:3, JULY 2005 FREMONTIA 2 CONTENTS GUEST EDITORIAL: TRIAGE AND THE CONSERVATION ETHIC ............... 2 CHAPTERS OF THE CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: INSTALLMENT III .................................................................... 3 This third in a series of four articles celebrates members and local chapters which make up our Society, and includes those from the central part of the state: the Tahoe, El Dorado, Marin, Willis Linn Jepson, Yerba Buena, East Bay, Santa Cruz, and Santa Clara Valley chapters. Summaries of the remaining CNPS chapters will appear in the next issue of Fremontia. THE CNPS CONSERVATION PROGRAM by David Chipping.... 10 David Chipping (Professor of Geology at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo) has headed the conservation program since 1997. At the close of his tenure, the author reflects upon the Conservation Program of the Society, including an overview, how it relates to other CNPS programs, and some current challenges. CNPS VEGETATION PROGRAM: A FRESH LOOK BACK AND A NEW LOOK FORWARD by Todd Keeler-Wolf and Julie M. Evens ................................................................................................18 This article highlights the history of the CNPS Vegetation Program from its inception, with a positive look at the present and towards the future. The program has benefited tremen- dously from the work of its committee members and chapter volunteers, and now advances to new projects with paid staff on board. THE CONSERVATION OF TWO SONOMA COUNTY MANZANITAS by Greg Wahlert and Phil Van Soelen ........................... 24 Sonoma County is a hot spot of plant endemism in California, with 18 plant taxa known only from the county, including four species of manzanita. The authors tell the story of two such endemics: Vine Hill manzanita (Arctostaphylos densiflora) and Rincon manzanita (Arctostaphylos stanfordiana ssp. decumbens), and speak to both the challenges to their survival and conservation successes. IN MEMORIAM: SCOTT SUNDBERG, 1954-2004 by Aaron Liston ......................... 31 BOOK REVIEW ................................................................................................... 32 THE COVER: High elevation region in the Mineral King area of Sequoia National Park. The white rock in the background is rich in marble and carbonate-loving endemic species. One of the jobs of the California Native Plant Society Conservation Program is monitoring management actions of federal agencies so that special places like these and the endemic species they harbor enjoy continued protection. Photograph by D. Chipping. VOLUME 33:3, JULY 2005 FREMONTIA 1 GUEST EDITORIAL: TRIAGE AND THE CONSERVATION ETHIC USEFUL WEBSITES AND CONTACT INFORMATION ot enough money, not enough human resources, and not enough N California Native Plant time! This lament is heard from anyone working in conservation. Society (CNPS): As I draw to the end of my tenure as conservation director, I will try to www.cnps.org, with links to conservation issues, chapters, define an ethical basis for making choices about which conservation battles publications, policy, etc. we should join or run from, one that reflects the ethical choices made in the For updates on conservation battlefield triage of the wounded. issues: It is no easy thing to agree on the value of an at-risk plant or habitat. If Audubon Society www.audubon.org Center for Biological Diversity a plant is long-lived (such as a redwood tree), is it more valuable in some way www.sw-center.org than a tree that lives a century, a shrub that lives a few years, or an annual Native Plant Conservation plant? Is a plant of great beauty of greater value than a plant of nondescript Campaign www.plantsocieties.org Natural Resources Defense appearance? Is the last little patch of native vegetation in the center of town Council where it is seen by hundreds of people on a daily basis more valuable than a www.nrdc.org thousand acres of native plant habitat in the distant corner of Modoc Sierra Club www.sierraclub.org County on private ranchland? Is a plant community that contains a CNPS Wilderness Society List 1B plant of greater value than one that does not, and how would the www.wilderness.org richness and health of the other species play a role in the decision? If we For voting
Recommended publications
  • 2004 Vegetation Classification and Mapping of Peoria Wildlife Area
    Vegetation classification and mapping of Peoria Wildlife Area, South of New Melones Lake, Tuolumne County, California By Julie M. Evens, Sau San, and Jeanne Taylor Of California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 In Collaboration with John Menke Of Aerial Information Systems 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 November 2004 Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Vegetation Classification Methods................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Figure 1. Survey area including Peoria Wildlife Area and Table Mountain .................................................. 2 Sampling ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Figure 2. Locations of the field surveys. ....................................................................................................... 4 Existing Literature Review ......................................................................................................................... 5 Cluster Analyses for Vegetation Classification .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terr–3 Special-Status Plant Populations
    TERR–3 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT POPULATIONS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During 2001 and 2002, the review of existing information, agency consultation, vegetation community mapping, and focused special-status plant surveys were completed. Based on California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2001a), CDFG’s Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFG 2003), USDA-FS Regional Forester’s List of Sensitive Plant and Animal Species for Region 5 (USDA-FS 1998), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species List (USFWS 2003), and Sierra National Forest (SNF) Sensitive Plant List (Clines 2002), there were 100 special-status plant species initially identified as potentially occurring within the Study Area. Known occurrences of these species were mapped. Vegetation communities were evaluated to locate areas that could potentially support special-status plant species. Each community was determined to have the potential to support at least one special-status plant species. During the spring and summer of 2002, special-status plant surveys were conducted. For each special-status plant species or population identified, a CNDDB form was completed, and photographs were taken. The locations were mapped and incorporated into a confidential GIS database. Vascular plant species observed during surveys were recorded. No state or federally listed special-status plant species were identified during special- status plant surveys. Seven special-status plant species, totaling 60 populations, were identified during surveys. There were 22 populations of Mono Hot Springs evening-primrose (Camissonia sierrae ssp. alticola) identified. Two populations are located near Mammoth Pool, one at Bear Forebay, and the rest are in the Florence Lake area.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 4-2019 Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Vascular Plants of the Coastal Dunes of Humboldt County, California" (2019). Botanical Studies. 41. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/41 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE COASTAL DUNES OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California Ninth Edition • August 2019 Amaryllidaceae — Onion or Amaryllis Family F E R N S Allium unifolium •One-leaved onion Dennstaedtiaceae — Bracken Fern Family Anacardiaceae — Cashew Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens • Bracken fern Toxicodendron diversilobum • Poison-oak Ophioglossaceae — Adder’s-tongue Family Apocynaceae — Dogbane or Milkweed Family Botrychium multifidum • Leathery
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County
    A PPENDIX II Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX II. Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County Family Scientific Name Common Name FERN AND FERN ALLIES Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken family Pteridium aquilinum var.pubescens Bracken fern Dryopteridaceae Wood fern family Athyrium alpestre var. americanum Alpine lady fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Lady fern Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Cliff sword fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricate sword fern Polystichum kruckebergii Kruckeberg’s hollyfern Polystichum lonchitis Northern hollyfern Polystichum munitum Sword fern Equisetaceae Horsetail family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Scouring rush Equisetum laevigatum Smooth horsetail Isoetaceae Quillwort family Isoetes bolanderi Bolander’s quillwort Isoetes howellii Howell’s quillwort Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort Lycopodiaceae Club-moss family Lycopodiella inundata Bog club-moss Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita ssp. vestita Water clover Pilularia americana American pillwort Ophioglossaceae Adder’s-tongue family Botrychium multifidum Leathery grapefern Polypodiaceae Polypody family Polypodium hesperium Western polypody Pteridaceae Brake family Adiantum aleuticum Five-finger maidenhair Adiantum jordanii Common maidenhair fern Aspidotis densa Indian’s dream Cheilanthes cooperae Cooper’s
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Humboldt Bay's Dunes and Wetlands Published by U.S
    Vascular Plants of Humboldt Bay's Dunes and Wetlands Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. Leppig and A. Pickart and California Department of Fish Game Release 4.0 June 2014* www.fws.gov/refuge/humboldt_bay/ Habitat- Habitat - Occurs on Species Status Occurs within Synonyms Common name specific broad Lanphere- Jepson Manual (2012) (see codes at end) refuge (see codes at end) (see codes at end) Ma-le'l Units UD PW EW Adoxaceae Sambucus racemosa L. red elderberry RF, CDF, FS X X N X X Aizoaceae Carpobrotus chilensis (Molina) sea fig DM X E X X N.E. Br. Carpobrotus edulis ( L.) N.E. Br. Iceplant DM X E, I X Alismataceae lanceleaf water Alisma lanceolatum With. FM X E plantain northern water Alisma triviale Pursh FM X N plantain Alliaceae three-cornered Allium triquetrum L. FS, FM, DM X X E leek Allium unifolium Kellogg one-leaf onion CDF X N X X Amaryllidaceae Amaryllis belladonna L. belladonna lily DS, AW X X E Narcissus pseudonarcissus L. daffodil AW, DS, SW X X E X Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron diversilobum Torrey poison oak CDF, RF X X N X X & A. Gray (E. Greene) Apiaceae Angelica lucida L. seacoast angelica BM X X N, C X X Anthriscus caucalis M. Bieb bur chevril DM X E Cicuta douglasii (DC.) J. Coulter & western water FM X N Rose hemlock Conium maculatum L. poison hemlock RF, AW X I X Daucus carota L. Queen Anne's lace AW, DM X X I X American wild Daucus pusillus Michaux DM, SW X X N X X carrot Foeniculum vulgare Miller sweet fennel AW, FM, SW X X I X Glehnia littoralis (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ione Buckwheat), and Discussion of the Two Species Proposed RIN 1018±AE25 Eriogonum Apricum Var
    34190 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 1997 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: nutrient-poor conditions of the soil Background which exclude other plant species; the Fish and Wildlife Service climate of the area may be moderated by Arctostaphylos myrtifolia (Ione its position due east of the Golden Gate 50 CFR Part 17 manzanita), Eriogonum apricum var. (Gankin and Major 1964, Roof 1982). apricum (Ione buckwheat), and Discussion of the Two Species Proposed RIN 1018±AE25 Eriogonum apricum var. prostratum (Irish Hill buckwheat) are found for Listing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife primarily in western Amador County, Parry (1887) described Arctostaphylos and Plants; Proposed Endangered about 70 kilometers (km) (40 miles (mi)) myrtifolia based upon material collected Status for the Plant Eriogonum southeast of Sacramento in the central near Ione, California. Subsequent Apricum (Ione Buckwheat) and Sierra Nevada foothills of California. authors variously treated this taxon as Proposed Threatened Status for the Most populations occur at elevations Uva-ursi myrtifolia (Abrams 1914), A. Plant Arctostaphylos Myrtifolia (Ione between 90 and 280 meters (m) (280 to nummularia var. myrtifolia (Jepson Manzanita) 900 feet (ft)). A few isolated occurrences 1922), Schizococcus myrtifolius of A. myrtifolia occur in adjacent (Eastwood 1934), and Arctostaphylos AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, northern Calaveras County. uva-ursi ssp. myrtifolia (Roof 1982). Interior. Both species included in
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Year Review of Menzies' Wallflower
    Menzies’ Wallflower (Erysimum menziesii) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arcata Field Office Arcata, California June 2008 5-YEAR REVIEW Species reviewed: Menzies’ wallflower (Erysimum menziesii) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. General Information A. Methodology B. Reviewers C. Background II. Review Analysis A. Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) Policy B. Recovery Criteria C. Updated Information and Current Species Status 1. Biology and Habitat 2. Five-Factor Analysis D. Synthesis III. Results IV. Recommendations for Future Actions V. References 1 5-YEAR REVIEW Menzies’ wallflower (Erysimum menziesii) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete the review: This review was conducted by David Imper, Ecologist, with the Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS), based on all information contained in files at that office and provided by other agencies. No comments were received from the public or other agencies in response to the Federal Notice. B. Reviewers Lead Region – Region 8, California and Nevada; Diane Elam, Deputy Division Chief for Listing, Recovery, and Habitat Conservation Planning, and Jenness McBride, Fish and Wildlife Biologist; (916)414-6464 Lead Field Office – Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office; Mike Long (707)822-7201 Cooperating Field Office(s) – Ventura, California C. Background 1. FR Notice citation announcing initiation of this review: Federal Register 71(55):14538-14542, March 22, 2006 2. Listing history Original Listing FR notice: 50 Federal Register 27848-27859 Date listed: June 22, 1992 Entity listed: Erysimum menziesii (species) Classification: Endangered Revised Listing, if applicable: NA 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SIEN/NRTR—2010/389 ON THE COVER USGS and NPS joint survey for Tompkins’ sedge (Carex tompkinsii), south side Merced River, El Portal, Mariposa County, California (upper left); Yosemite onion (Allium yosemitense) (upper right); Yosemite lewisia (Lewisia disepala) (lower left); habitat model for mountain lady’s slipper (Cypripedium montanum) in Yosemite National Park, California (lower right). Photographs by: Peggy E. Moore. Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SIEN/NRTR—2010/389 Peggy E. Moore, Alison E. L. Colwell, and Charlotte L. Coulter U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center 5083 Foresta Road El Portal, California 95318 October 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • California Wildflower Collection of Watercolors
    The Santa Barbara Botanic Garden presents the SBBG Blaksley Library “California Wildflower Collection of Watercolors” by Patrick O’Hara 1212 Mission Canyon Road Patrick O’Hara has built a high international reputation in the world of Santa Barbara, botanical art – reaching around the world from the tiny village of Currabinny California 93105 in the south-west of Ireland. The “California Wildflower Collection of (805) 682-4726 Watercolors,” specifically commissioned by the Santa Barbara Botanic www.sbbg.org Garden is the culmination of a lifetime’s deep involvement with plant conservation, and nearly forty years’ experience as an artist. Patrick has studied rare and special wildflowers in wilderness and rugged habitats right around the world and his botanic art has been used to support and highlight conservation projects in many different countries. The extent of his travels around the United States continually surprises Americans, and although, like the first European settlers, it took him a while to reach California, he felt in 1996 that he had finally reached his “land of flowers and honey.” The Santa Barbara Botanic Garden Presents Patrick O’Hara SBBG Patrick O’Hara #1 “The Star Lily and the Iris” Douglas Iris (Iris douglasiana) Star Lily (Zigadenus fremontii) Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) Location studied: cliff top woodland edge at Point Lobos Season: early April 2006 Dimension: 18.5” x 21.5” Framed Artist’s own reference: W/P 620. The story behind “The Star Lily and the Iris” Although I had visited Point Lobos State Reserve in 1996 and 1998, and quite fallen in love with this magical headland a short distance from Monterey, with its profusion of marine and coastal fauna and flora, I had not expected to see a virtual carpet of Douglas irises under the pine trees one morning in early April, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Coulter's Californian Exsiccata
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 37 Issue 1 Issue 1–2 Article 2 2019 Plantae Coulterianae: Thomas Coulter’s Californian Exsiccata Gary D. Wallace California Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Wallace, Gary D. (2020) "Plantae Coulterianae: Thomas Coulter’s Californian Exsiccata," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 37: Iss. 1, Article 2. Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol37/iss1/2 Aliso, 37(1–2), pp. 1–73 ISSN: 0065-6275 (print), 2327-2929 (online) PLANTAE COULTERIANAE: THOMAS COULTER’S CALIFORNIAN EXSICCATA Gary D. Wallace California Botanic Garden [formerly Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden], 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711 ([email protected]) abstract An account of the extent, diversity, and importance of the Californian collections of Thomas Coulter in the herbarium (TCD) of Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, is presented here. It is based on examination of collections in TCD, several other collections available online, and referenced literature. Additional infor- mation on historical context, content of herbarium labels and annotations is included. Coulter’s collections in TCD are less well known than partial duplicate sets at other herbaria. He was the first botanist to cross the desert of southern California to the Colorado River. Coulter’s collections in TCD include not only 60 vascular plant specimens previously unidentified as type material but also among the first moss andmarine algae specimens known to be collected in California. A list of taxa named for Thomas Coulter is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development
    Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development Agreement Draft Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachments April 16, 2021 ATTACHMENT A Existing Site Photographs Existing access road Existing water tank site Existing "house site" on one of the proposed Development Parcels ATTACHMENT B Prepared For: Michelle Irace, Planning Manager Department of Community Development 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482 APNs: 001-040-83, 157- 070-01, 157-070-02, and 003-190-01 Prepared by Jacobszoon & Associates, Inc. Alicia Ives Ringstad Senior Wildlife Biologist [email protected] Date: March 11, 2021 Updated: April 8, 2021 Biological Assessment Report Table of Contents Section 1.0: Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 2.0: Regulations and Descriptions ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Natural Communities and Sensitive Natural Communities .................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Special-Status Species...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]