Siege Or Celebration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Siege Or Celebration Walls of Jerusalem. (Wikimedia Commons) N the Roman Empire the language During the First Jewish Revolt (66-70 Revolt (132-135 AD) “Jerusalem” in Ithat was most widely understood was AD) the Jews issued silver shekels with Hebrew appears on the obverse of the Greek, not Latin. In Rome educated “Jerusalem the holy” in Hebrew on the silver shekels. (Figure 4) people wrote in Greek. Even the Roman reverse. (Figure 3) In the Second Jewish After the Second Jewish Revolt the emperor Marcus Aurelius (161-180 AD) Revolt, also known as the Bar Kokhba Roman emperor Hadrian changed the wrote his Meditations in Greek. The name of the city to Aelia Capitolina, and Hebrew Scriptures (known to Christians he issued bronze coins bearing this as the Old Testament) were translated name. (Figures 5 and 6) “Aelia” refers from Hebrew into Greek in the 3rd and to Hadrian’s family name “Aelius” while 2nd centuries BC, and the New Testament “Capitolina” refers to the Capitoline Hill was originally written in Greek in the first century AD. Therefore it is surpris- ing that there are only two coins that bear the mint name of Jerusalem in Greek: ‘IEPOCOΛYMA (Hierosoluma). These coins were not issued until the Figure 2 – A reduced follis minted at Jerusalem. Obverse: standing figure of an emperor with reign of Heraclius (610-641 AD) when ONO on the left. Reverse: cursive M with IEPO Jerusalem was in the Byzantine Empire (Jerusalem) on the left. Although not visible in which succeeded the Roman Empire in this image the letters COΛV are said to be on the the east. (Figures 1 and 2) In the New right and MWN in the exergue. These letters add Testament the name of the city also up to IEPOCOΛVMWN, which means “of the people of Jerusalem.” 2.73 grams. (This coin is in the occurs as IEPOYCAΛHM (Ierousalem), Abraham D. Sofaer Collection and is illustrated and this is the form that eventually came in the book “Cultural Change” by David Hendin into English as ‘Jerusalem’. who kindly granted permission to use the image.) Figure 1 – Follis of Heraclius minted at Jerusalem. Obverse: Heraclius holds an eagle-tipped Figure 3 – Silver shekel of the First Jewish sceptre in his left hand. Reverse: large M (40) with ANNO (in the year) to the left and II II (4) to Revolt. The Hebrew words on the reverse mean the right, and IEPOCO’ (Hieroso’) in the exergue. (The sign at the end is sometimes said to be a “Jerusalem the Holy.” Hendin, “Guide to Biblical retrograde S, but it is more likely to be a mark, like an apostrophe, to indicate missing letters.) Coins,” 1358. (Classical Numismatic Group, Auc- 33mms, 14.29 grams. Sear, Byzantine Coins, 852B. (Triton XV, Lot 1591) tion 97, Lot 350) in Rome. On that hill stood the great Jesus was unearthed under the Temple destination for Christian pilgrims eager temple to Jupiter, the chief of the gods in of Aphrodite in 327 and a church built to see the places mentioned in the Bible, the Roman pantheon. Hadrian wanted over the site, the city was still called and when Cyril became the city’s bishop the city to be understood in the future as Aelia. Eusebius, the bishop of Caesarea, in 349 he no longer called it Aelia. Grad- a Roman city, and the Roman emperors from 315 to 340 used the name, New ually the name, Jerusalem, came back continued to issue coins with the mint Jerusalem, only for the church and tomb into use. name, Aelia Capitolina, up to the reign complex. Helena, the mother of Con- In 610 Khusru II, the ruler of the of Trajan Decius (249-251) after which stantine, probably visited the site when Sasanian Empire, which included Persia the city ceased minting coins. The name, it was being excavated and according to and Mesopotamia, invaded the Byzantine Aelia, however, continued to be the name later tradition she discovered the True Empire. (Figure 7) Antioch fell in 611, of the city. Cross, the actual cross on which Jesus Damascus in 613, and on 15th April 614 Interest in the city as a holy place was was crucified. The city soon became the the Sasanian army besieged Jerusalem. revived when the Roman emperor Con- The Patriarch was prepared to surrender stantine (307-337) promoted Christianity the city but a group of young Christians after winning the battle of the Milvian would not allow it. They were convinced Bridge in 312, but even after the tomb of that God would save the city somehow. The siege lasted about three weeks, and when Jerusalem fell in May there were horrible scenes of mass slaughter. Accor- ding to an eyewitness account the soldiers “rushed into the city like wild boars, roaring, hissing, and killing everyone in sight.” Many thousands of Christians were killed and the city was vandalized. The True Cross was carried off to Ctesiphon, the Sasanian capital, and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was set on fire. The whole of Christendom was shocked and the people looked to Heraclius who was only about thirty-six when he was crowned emperor in Constantinople in 610. In 614 it seemed as if the Byzan- tine Empire was disintegrating because the armies of Khusru II were invading from the east and the Slavs and Avars Figure 6 – Bronze coin of Hadrian minted at Aelia Capitolina. 13 mms diameter. On the re- verse a boar walks to the right with COL above and AEL below. The boar, a wild fighting ani- Figure 4 – Silver shekel of the Second Jewish mal, was a symbol of the Tenth Roman Legion Revolt. The Hebrew word on the obverse which was based in Aelia Capitolina. It would means, “Jerusalem.” Hendin, “Guide to Bibli- also be insulting to the Jews for whom pigs cal Coins,” 1387. (Heritage Auctions, Shoshana were unclean (Leviticus 11:7). Meshorer 4. Collection, March 2012, Lot 20261) (Author’s collection) Figure 5 – Bronze coin of Hadrian minted at Aelia Capitolina. On the reverse Hadrian (or a Roman official) is ploughing with two oxen. A vexillum (Roman standard) is in the background. The ab- breviated Latin words, COL AEL KAPIT COND, mean “founding the colony of Aelia Capitolina.” This ceremony was performed whenever a Roman colony was founded. In this case it is the ful- Figure 7 – Silver drachm of Khusru II whose im- filment of the prophecy of Micah, who was a Jewish prophet who lived in Judah in about 700 age is on the obverse. On the reverse attendants BC: “Zion will be ploughed like a field.” (Micah 3:12) Meshorer 2. (Author’s collection) stand beside a fire altar. (Author’s collection) were invading from the north. But II was assassinated in a palace coup. clius entered the city at the head of a Heraclius bided his time and carefully The Sasanians agreed to return the True splendid procession. He carried the True strengthened the empire and built up his Cross and to withdraw from all the Cross himself (Figure 8) and with great military forces. By 622 he was ready to territories that they had taken. The ceremony it was returned to the Church take the offensive. Then for six years he Christians throughout the Byzantine of the Holy Sepulchre. It was a time of campaigned in the east until eventually Empire rejoiced, especially in Jerusalem celebration. he approached Ctesiphon where Khusru where in 630 with much fanfare Hera- With knowledge of the history of this tumultuous period we can now consider the coin shown in Figure 1. Was it issued in 614 during the siege of Jerusalem, or was it issued in 630 when the True Cross was returned to the city? Those who favour a date of 614 argue that the coin was issued to encourage the people dur- ing the siege. They point to a coin struck from the same obverse die that has XC NIKA (Christ conquers) in the exergue (Figure 9) and say that this reflects a time when the people looked to God for salvation. The Greek words can also be translated in the imperative: “Christ, conquer!” Moreover, ANNO II II (year 4) on the reverse has traditionally indicated the length of the emperor’s reign and because Heraclius became emperor in 610 the date would be 614. Another feature in favour of the earlier date is that the emperor on the obverse has a pointed beard which Heraclius did not have. He had been emperor for only four years and apparently the die-en- graver in Jerusalem had no image of him to copy, so he copied the image of the previous emperor, Phocas (602-610), who had a pointed beard and appeared on Figure 8 – Painting, “Heraclius carrying the Cross,” by Pierre Subleyras, 1728. The actual scene would have been different from what this artist has imagined. The Cross would have been only a remnant, not complete, and according to one account it had been sent from Persia in a crate and Heraclius left it so. (Wikimedia Commons) Figure 10 – Follis of Phocas minted at Antioch. The name of the city was changed to Theoupolis Figure 9 – Follis of Heraclius minted at Jerusalem. It is the same as the coin in Figure 1 except (City of God) after an earthquake in 528 AD. Sear, that it has XC NIKA (Christ conquers) in the exergue. Sear, Byzantine Coins, 852C. (Classical Byzantine Coins, 672. (Münzen & Medaillen, Numismatic Group, Auction 102, Lot 1150) Auction 16, Lot 1202) folles minted at Antioch. (Figure 10) True Cross Jerusalem was captured by ures 1 and 9 the die engravers would Moreover, the die engraver has given the Muslims.
Recommended publications
  • Jerusalem in Classical Ages: a Critical Review
    Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 14, No 2, pp. 139-154 Copyright © 2014 MAA Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. JERUSALEM IN CLASSICAL AGES: A CRITICAL REVIEW Sultan Abdullah Ma'ani1, Abd alrzaq Al-Maani 2, Mohammed Al-Nasarat2 1Queen Rania Institute of Tourism and Heritage, Hashemite University, Jordan 2Department of History, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Ma’an, Jordan Received: 07/10/2013 Accepted: 06/12/2013 Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT This study is a review and in several cases it sheds light upon the history of Jerusalem City during the Roman and Byzantine epochs through focusing on a) the demography of the city, b) the names which had been mentioned in historical sources, c) ancient inscrip- tions and d) its urban design. The review goes through Jewish sources, particularly those which deal with the reign of the Roman leader, Pompey (Pompey the Great) and the Maccabees (Machabees); the reign of the Roman Emperor, Titus, during which the Jews were tortured; the reign of the Roman king of Jews, Herod (or Herod the Great); the reign of the Roman Emperor, Ha- drian; and the converting of the City from paganism to Christianity. KEYWORDS: Jerusalem, Roman epoch, Byzantine epoch, Hasmonean dynasty, historical sources, inscriptions. 140 MA'ANI et al 1. DEMOGRAPHY OF THE CITY The Jewish historian, Josephus, said that Herod built in the City a sports stadium and Jerusalem is a city fenced with valleys, a horse-racing hippodrome (Al-Fanny, 2007, situated above a mountains range in Central p.15). Palestine. This range extends between the Jerusalem, as the other big cities of Pales- Palestinian coast to the west and the Negev tine and Syria, uses the Latin language as an desert to both the east and south.
    [Show full text]
  • Betar and Aelia Capitolina: Symbols of Jewish Suffering Dr
    Betar and Aelia Capitolina: Symbols of Jewish Suffering Dr. Jill Katz Professor of Archaeology and Anthropology, Yeshiva University Of the five specific tragedies that warrant fasting on Tishah b’Av (Mishnah Taanit 4:6), two are related to the Second Jewish Revolt against Rome. The first is the capture of the city of Betar (135 CE) and the second is the plowing of Jerusalem one year later. At first glance, these calamities do not seem to be of the same scale as the destruction of the First and Second Temples. The Jews were neither forcibly removed en masse to a distant land nor was a standing Temple destroyed. Perhaps one could argue that their inclusion within the list was simply due to their still being fresh in people’s memories. Surely, the rabbis of the Mishnaic period would have encountered eyewitnesses to these events and been moved by their recollections. Yet, if this were so, then the Mishnah really need only include one reference to the rebellion. By including two, the Mishnah is teaching us something about the magnitude of this tragedy and the challenges that lay ahead for the Jewish people. Betar If not for the Bar Kokhba rebellion, it is unlikely many people would be familiar with Betar. The ancient city (Khirbet el-Yahud – “ruin of the Jews”) was a modest settlement southwest of Jerusalem in the Judean Hills. Surveys and brief excavations have demonstrated that Betar was first settled during the period of the Shoftim and became a city of moderate importance by the time of Hizkiyahu.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Staying Neutral the Netherlands in the First World War, 1914-1918
    9 789053 568187 abbenhuis06 11-04-2006 17:29 Pagina 1 THE ART OF STAYING NEUTRAL abbenhuis06 11-04-2006 17:29 Pagina 2 abbenhuis06 11-04-2006 17:29 Pagina 3 The Art of Staying Neutral The Netherlands in the First World War, 1914-1918 Maartje M. Abbenhuis abbenhuis06 11-04-2006 17:29 Pagina 4 Cover illustration: Dutch Border Patrols, © Spaarnestad Fotoarchief Cover design: Mesika Design, Hilversum Layout: PROgrafici, Goes isbn-10 90 5356 818 2 isbn-13 978 90 5356 8187 nur 689 © Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2006 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. abbenhuis06 11-04-2006 17:29 Pagina 5 Table of Contents List of Tables, Maps and Illustrations / 9 Acknowledgements / 11 Preface by Piet de Rooij / 13 Introduction: The War Knocked on Our Door, It Did Not Step Inside: / 17 The Netherlands and the Great War Chapter 1: A Nation Too Small to Commit Great Stupidities: / 23 The Netherlands and Neutrality The Allure of Neutrality / 26 The Cornerstone of Northwest Europe / 30 Dutch Neutrality During the Great War / 35 Chapter 2: A Pack of Lions: The Dutch Armed Forces / 39 Strategies for Defending of the Indefensible / 39 Having to Do One’s Duty: Conscription / 41 Not True Reserves? Landweer and Landstorm Troops / 43 Few
    [Show full text]
  • 4.2-Persecution Under Valens (371-373) Copyright 2018 Glen L
    4.2-Persecution under Valens (371-373) Copyright 2018 Glen L. Thompson This document is provided for personal and educational use. It may not be used for commercial purposes without the permission of the copyright holder. Last updated 6/6/18 Socrates Sozomen Theodoret Macedonians seek fellowship with Liberius 4.12.1 But we will have more opportunity to mention 6.10.3 Valens and Eudoxius then directed their both Basil and Gregory again in the course of our history. resentment against the Macedonians, who were more When the maintainers of the homoousian doctrine had been numerous than the above-mentioned Christians in that severely dealt with and put to flight, the persecutors began region, and they persecuted them without measure. The again to harass the Macedonians. Macedonians, in apprehension of further sufferings, sent 4.12.2 Impelled by fear rather than violence, the delegates to various cities, and finally agreed to turn to Macedonians sent messengers to one another from city to Valentinian and to the bishop of Rome rather than share city, declaring the necessity of appealing to the emperor’s in the faith of Eudoxius and Valens and their followers. brother, and to Liberius bishop of Rome, saying that it was far better for them to embrace their faith, than to commune with the party of Eudoxius. 4.12.3 For this purpose they sent Eustathius bishop of 6.10.4 And when it seemed ideal to do this, they Sebastia, who had been deposed several times, Silvanus of selected three of their own number—Eustathius, bishop Tarsus in Cilicia, and Theophilus of Castabala in the same of Sebaste; Silvanus, bishop of Tarsus; and Theophilus, province, charging them to not to disagree with Liberius in bishop of Castabalis—and sent them to the Emperor anything concerning the faith, but to enter into communion Valentinian.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient, British and World Coins War Medals and Decorations Historical Medals Banknotes
    Ancient, British and World Coins War Medals and Decorations Historical Medals Banknotes To be sold by auction at: The Westbury Hotel Bond Street London W1S 2YF Days of Sale: Wednesday 13th November 2002 10.00 am, 11.30 am, 2.30 pm Thursday 14th November 2002 10.00 am Public viewing: 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Monday 11th November 2002 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Tuesday 12th November 2002 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Or by previous appointment Catalogue price £10 Enquiries: James Morton, Tom Eden, Paul Wood or Stephen Lloyd Cover illustrations: Lots 767-786 (front); Lot 522 (back) Front cover photography by Ken Adlard in association with 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Tel.: +44 (0)20 7493 5344 Fax: +44 (0)20 7495 6325 E-mail: [email protected] www.mortonandeden.com Important Information for Buyers All lots are offered subject to Morton & Eden Ltd.’s Conditions of Business and to reserves. Estimates are published as a guide only and are subject to review. The actual hammer price of a lot may well be higher or lower than the range of figures given and there are no fixed “starting prices”. A Buyer’s Premium of 15% is applicable to all lots in this sale. Excepting lots sold under “temporary import” rules which are marked with the symbol ‡ (see below), the Buyer’s Premium is subject to VAT at the standard rate (currently 17½%). Lots are offered for sale under the auctioneer’s margin scheme and VAT on the Buyer’s Premium is payable by all buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient, Islamic, British and World Coins Historical Medals and Banknotes
    Ancient, Islamic, British and World Coins Historical Medals and Banknotes To be sold by auction at: Sotheby’s, in the Upper Grosvenor Gallery The Aeolian Hall, Bloomfield Place New Bond Street London W1 Day of Sale: Thursday 29 November 2007 10.00 am and 2.00 pm Public viewing: 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Friday 23 November 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Monday 26 November 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Tuesday 27 November 10.00 am to 4.30 pm Wednesday 28 November See below Or by previous appointment. Please note that viewing arrangements on Wednesday 28 November will be by appointment only, owing to restricted facilities. For convenience and comfort we strongly recommend that clients wishing to view multiple or bulky lots should plan to do so before 28 November. Catalogue no. 30 Price £10 Enquiries: James Morton, Tom Eden, Paul Wood or Stephen Lloyd Cover illustrations: Lot 172 (front); ex Lot 412 (back); Lot 745 (detail, inside front and back covers) in association with 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Tel.: +44 (0)20 7493 5344 Fax: +44 (0)20 7495 6325 Email: [email protected] Website: www.mortonandeden.com This auction is conducted by Morton & Eden Ltd. in accordance with our Conditions of Business printed at the back of this catalogue. All questions and comments relating to the operation of this sale or to its content should be addressed to Morton & Eden Ltd. and not to Sotheby’s. Important Information for Buyers All lots are offered subject to Morton & Eden Ltd.’s Conditions of Business and to reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Power of the Roman Empire
    26 Potter Chapter 2 Measuring the Power of the Roman Empire David Potter By the age of Cicero – the point at which they began to recognize the fact that they controlled a territorial empire and could raise revenue from it – the Ro- mans were accustomed to measure their power with criteria taken over whole- sale from Greek theory. In the De Legibus, Cicero says simply that senators ought to know the state of the army, the treasury, the allies, friends and tribu- taries of Rome and the nature of the attachment of each to Rome. For Cicero this is what it was to “know the State.”1 In these terms power is a function of income and manpower. Such a measurement, which, as we shall see, would have a long history going forward, was even then being amply employed by Gaius Caesar in his Gallic Wars, and had a long prior history in Greek thought. Caesar famously illustrated the power of the various Gallic and German tribes he subdued or encountered by telling his readers how many of them there were or had been. Good of the Helvetians to have produced a census docu- ment (in Greek no less) attesting to the fact that there were 368,000 of them at the beginning of their migration. There were now a mere 110,000 going home. The Suebi, the most powerful of the Germans were said (a nice concession on Caesar’s part) to have controlled one hundred districts which each furnished 1000 men to fight each year – since the same warriors only fought every other year, this meant that there were at least 200,000 of them, and there were nearly 250,000 Gauls who came to the relief of Vercingetorix (including men from tribes such as the Nervii that Caesar claimed to have annihilated in recent years).2 A conception of state power as a function of demography and money would have been familiar to any Roman aristocrat who knew (as any Roman aristo- crat would have) the works of fifth-century Greek historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Eusebius and Hadrian's Founding of Aelia Capitolina in Jerusalem
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 26 (2019): 119–128 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.19.007.11210 www.ejournals.eu/electrum EUSEBIUS AND HADRIAN’S FOUNDING OF AELIA CAPItoLINA IN JERUSALEM Miriam Ben Zeev Hofman Ben Gurion University of the Negev Abstract: From numismatic findings and recent excavations in the Old City of Jerusalem it emerges that the preparatory work on Aelia Capitolina started at the very beginning of Hadrian’ reign, most probably in the 120s, more than a decade before the Bar Kokhba war. The question then arises as how it happened that Eusebius mentions the founding of this colony as a conse- quence of the war. The answer lies both in the source he depends upon, possibly Ariston of Pella, and also in Eusebius’ own conception of Jewish history. Keywords: Bar Kokhba’s coins, Jerusalem excavations, Ariston of Pella, Eusebius’ view of Jewish history. The military colony of Aelia Capitolina which Hadrian founded in Jerusalem constitutes a traumatic event and a turning point in Jewish history. The holy city of Jerusalem turned into a pagan site inhabited by Roman soldiers, where idolatrous shrines were built and pagan religious rites were held. Jews were prohibited from entering it. The meaning of this event has been variously interpreted in modern scholarship,1 and its very timing within the context of the Bar Kokhba war has long been debated in view of the conflicting testimonies provided by the extant sources. At the beginning of the third century CE, Cassius Dio records the founding of the colony as preceding the Bar 1 For example, scholars are found who consider it usual Roman praxis and attribute it to technical and logistical considerations (Bowersock 1980, 134–135, 138; Mildenberg 1980, 332–334; Schäfer 1981, 92; Schäfer 1990, 287–288, 296; Schäfer 2003, 147; see also Tameanko 1999, 21; Bieberstein 2007, 143–144; Bazzana 2010, 98–99), while others contend that the founding was meant to put an end to Jewish expectations of a Temple by founding a miniature Rome explicitly intended for the settlement of foreign races and for- eign religious rites.
    [Show full text]
  • Story of Judaism - Timeline
    Story of Judaism - Timeline God creates the world by speaking; therefore, Hebrew letters have creative power. God of Jews is Creator of the World – not tribal. Creation of Humanity Year 0 Special place to Humans. Two stories. No original sin. Abraham: God chooses Abraham Covenant – promise and contract: the chosen people Moses: Leads people of Israel out of slavery in Egypt Inscription of Merneptah – first mention of Israel in recorded history (1206 BCE) C C BCE th 12 Moses receives the law on Mt Sinai – ten commandments, sacrificial system, other - th commandments 14 Beginning of Judaism King David: Model of king for Israel Kingdom of Israel C C BCE Temple is built (under his son, Solomon) th Sacrifices at the temple – means of forgiveness 10 Centralized political and religious system Assyrians invade and destroy the northern kingdom of Israel They seem to disappear from history 722 BCE Babylon conquers the southern kingdom of Judah. Temple is destroyed Leaders and others taken into exile in Babylon 586 BCE Development of first synagogues – place of prayer and study Return to Jerusalem – gradual Many stay in Babylon for more than 2000 years there is a Jewish community in that region Ezra and Nehemiah are early leaders 520 BCE Temple is gradually rebuilt: it is smaller but sacrifices begin again Political kingdom never becomes as large and powerful as before Seleucid Greeks conquer Israel Desecrate the temple by sacrificing a pig in temple C C BCE Maccabees revolt and expel the Seleucids nd 2 Re-dedication of temple leads to holiday of Chanukah Story of Judaism - Timeline Roman General, Titus, destroys Jerusalem and the 2nd temple What should we do after destruction of temple and Jerusalem? 4 answers: (Josephus, mourn, die, Rabbinic) Beginning of Rabbinic Judaism 70 CE Redefinition of Judaism – no longer sacrifices at temple Rabbis (teachers), Torah, Talmud, Study and Synagogue replace priests, temple and sacrifices.
    [Show full text]
  • Niketas Choniates Versus Manuel I Komnenos: Disputes Concernig Islam in the Context of the Byzantine Tradition
    Списание ЕПОХИ Издание на Историческия факултет на ВТУ „Св. св. Кирил и Методий” Том / Volume XXIV (2016), Journal EPOHI [EPOCHS] Книжка / Issue 2 Edition of the Department of History of St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Turnovo NIKETAS CHONIATES VERSUS MANUEL I KOMNENOS: DISPUTES CONCERNIG ISLAM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BYZANTINE TRADITION Dimitar Y. DIMITROV НИКИТА ХОНИАТ СРЕЩУ МАНУИЛ I КОМНИН: ПОЛЕМИКА, СВЪРЗАНА С ИСЛЯМА, В КОНТЕКСТА НА ВИЗАНТИЙСКАТА ТРАДИЦИЯ Димитър Й. ДИМИТРОВ Abstract: Byzantine society had very complex relations with the Islamic Eastern neighbors. Islam, to be sure, started and continued to be menace for Byzantium for the all long eighth centuries they used to coexist. However, Byzantine society needed a certain period of time to accept Islam as another religion, standing against Christianity in the East. After the first Byzantine revenge acts against Judaism a long tradition was formed with two main streams. The first of them envisaged Islam as a demoniac pseudo-religion (or anti-religion), the second being milder and ready to accept the Islamic neighbors not as a whole, but rather as different states, culturally not so different from Byzantium, with diplomacy playing role for keeping balance in the East. Thus, the Byzantine Realpolitik appeared as a phenomenon, what provoked crusaders to accuse Byzantium as being traitor to the Christian cause in the East. In that context should we pose the interesting incident at the end of Manuel I Komnenos’ reign (1143 – 1180). Both Church and society were provoked by the decision of the Emperor to lift up the anathemas against Allah from the trivial ritual of denouncing Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Aelia Capitolina’ Through a Review of the Archaeological Data
    Roman changes to the hill of Gareb in ‘Aelia Capitolina’ through a review of the archaeological data Roberto Sabelli Dipartimento di Architettura Università degli Studi di Firenze Abstract opposite page Following Jewish revolts, in 114-117 and 132-136 AD, the colony of Iulia Aelia Cap- Fig.1 itolina was founded by Publio Elio Traiano Adriano on the site of Jerusalem – View of the east side Aelia in his honour and Capitolina because it was intended to contain a Capi- of the old walled city from Kidron Valley tol for the Romans – so as to erase Jewish and Christian memories. On the ba- (R. Sabelli 2007) sis of the most recent research it is possible to reconstruct the main phases of transformation by the Romans of a part of the hill of Gareb: from a stone quar- ry (tenth century BC - first century AD) into a place of worship, first pagan with the Hadrianian Temple (second century AD) then Christian with the Costantin- ian Basilica (fourth century AD). Thanks to the material evidence, historical tes- timonies, and information on the architecture of temples in the Hadrianic pe- riod, we attempt to provide a reconstruction of the area where the pagan tem- ple was built, inside the expansion of the Roman town in the second century AD, aimed at the conservation and enhancement of these important traces of the history of Jerusalem. 1 The Gehenna Valley (Wadi er-Rababi to- The hill of Gareb in Jerusalem to the north of Mount Zion, bounded on the day) was for centuries used as city ity 1 dump and for disposing of the unburied south and west by the Valley of Gehenna (Hinnom Valley) , rises to 770 me- corpses of delinquents, which were then ters above sea level; its lowest point is at its junction with the Kidron Valley, burned.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter E. Kaegi ——————————
    oi.uchicago.edu/oi/AR/03-04/03-04_AR_TOC.html INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH Walter E. Kaegi Walter E. Kaegi continued to investigate, expand, and polish the embryo of his book manu- script The Dynamics of Muslim Invasions and Byzantine Resistance in North Africa. His book Heraclius Emperor of Byzantium, which Cambridge University Press published in 2003, contin- ues to sell well, his editor informs him. He published the following papers: “The Earliest Muslim Penetrations of Anatolia,” in Byzantine State and Society in Memory of Nikos Oikonomides, ed- ited by A. Avramea, A. Laiou, E. Chrysos (Athens, 2003), pp. 269–82; and “Les défaites de Byzance en Orient” and “Expansion musulmane. La conquête de l’Ouest” [French translations of “Religious Elements in Muslim Conquests” and “North Africa”] in Le Monde de la Bible (No. 154, November 2003): 14–19, 36–41. Kaegi also published some book reviews: “Review of Byzantium and the Arabs in the Sixth Century, Volume 2, Part 1,” by Irfan Shahid, in Journal of the American Oriental Society 123 (2003): 461–62; “Review of A Cumulative Bibliography of Medieval and Early Modern Military History and Technology, by K. DeVries,” for De Re Militari (2004): http://www.deremilitari.org/RESOURCES/REVIEWS/devries_cb.htm; and “Review of Armies of the Caliphs, by H. Kennedy, in International History Review 16 (2004): 105–07. Regarding publications now at press, Kaegi completed two articles that will appear in Byzantinische Forschungen 28 (2004): “The Interrelationship of Seventh-Century Muslim Raids into Anatolia with the Struggle for North Africa” and “Byzantine Studies Present and Future.” He also completed the following paper, “The Early Muslim Raids into Anatolia and Byzantine Reactions under Emperor Constans II,” which was accepted and will appear in the proceedings of the University of Erfurt (Germany) International Workshop on “The Encounter of Oriental Christianity with Islam in the 7th and 8th Centuries,” under the editorship of Emmanouela Grypeou.
    [Show full text]