DOCSLIB.ORG

Elk Falls Environmental Effects Monitoring (EEM) Cycle Four Interpretive Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elk Falls Environmental Effects Monitoring (EEM) Cycle Four Interpretive Report Elk Falls Environmental Effects Monitoring (EEM) Cycle Four Interpretive Report Final March 2007 Prepared for: Catalyst Paper Corporation Campbell River, British Columbia Suite 201 – 1571 Bellevue Ave., West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V7V 1A6 • Tel: 1.604.926.3261 • Fax: 1.604.926.5389 • www.hatfi eldgroup.com ELK FALLS ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MONITORING (EEM) CYCLE FOUR INTERPRETIVE REPORT FINAL Prepared for: CATALYST PAPER CORPORATION PO BOX 2000 NORTH ISLAND HIGHWAY CAMPBELL RIVER, BC V9W 5C9 Prepared by: HATFIELD CONSULTANTS SUITE 201 – 1571 BELLEVUE AVENUE WEST VANCOUVER, BC V7V 1A6 MARCH 2007 EF1128.2 Suite 201 – 1571 Bellevue Ave., West Vancouver, BC, Canada V7V 1A6 • Tel: 1.604.926.3261 • Fax: 1.604.926.5389 • www.hatfieldgroup.com TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................ iv LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................ vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................ vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................. viii DISTRIBUTION LIST .................................................................................... vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................. 1 2.0 MILL, STUDY AREA, AND CYCLE FOUR DESIGN UPDATE ........... 3 2.1 MILL OPERATIONS.................................................................................................3 2.1.1 Process Description and Update ........................................................................3 2.1.2 Effluent Quality ...................................................................................................4 2.1.3 Incidents within the Receiving Environment .......................................................6 2.2 STUDY AREA UPDATES......................................................................................... 6 2.3 CYCLE FOUR STUDY DESIGN UPDATE...............................................................7 3.0 PROCESS EFFLUENT SUBLETHAL TOXICOLOGICAL TESTING.............................................................................................. 8 3.1 SUBLETHAL TOXICITY TEST METHODS .............................................................9 3.1.1 General Methods and Definitions .......................................................................9 3.1.2 Test Methods ....................................................................................................10 3.2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Topsmelt (Atherinops affinis) Growth and Survival Test.................................... 11 3.2.2 Echinoderm Fertilization Test............................................................................ 11 3.2.3 Champia parvula Reproduction Test................................................................. 14 3.2.4 Potential Zone of Sublethal Effect ....................................................................14 3.3 CONCLUSIONS.....................................................................................................16 4.0 FISH TISSUE SURVEY ..................................................................... 17 4.1 FISH SURVEY........................................................................................................17 4.2 TISSUE ANALYSES: DIOXINS AND FURANS.................................................... 17 4.3 TAINTING EVALUATION ....................................................................................... 20 5.0 INTERTIDAL INVERTEBRATE SURVEY.......................................... 27 5.1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................27 5.2 METHODS..............................................................................................................28 5.2.1 Modifications to Sampling Design ....................................................................28 5.2.2 Station Selection...............................................................................................28 5.2.3 Field Sampling Procedures ..............................................................................31 5.2.4 Analytical Approach ..........................................................................................33 Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four – Final i Hatfield 5.3 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................37 5.3.1 Density and Community Composition ..............................................................37 5.3.2 Taxonomic Richness.........................................................................................40 5.3.3 Biotic Community Indices .................................................................................40 5.3.4 Supporting Environmental Variables.................................................................43 5.3.5 Statistical Analyses ...........................................................................................46 5.4 DISCUSSION .........................................................................................................51 6.0 CYCLE FOUR CONCLUSIONS ........................................................54 7.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................56 8.0 GLOSSARY .......................................................................................59 Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four – Final ii Hatfield LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Annual means for process effluent quality variables, Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division, 2004 to 2006. ...................................3 Table 3.1 Maximum potential zone of sublethal effect, Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division, EEM Cycle Four........................................15 Table 5.1 Sampling station characteristics, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four intertidal survey, summer 2006...................................................................29 Table 5.2 Summary of intertidal invertebrate community metrics, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006.......................................................................39 Table 5.3 Most abundant invertebrate taxa (per m2) in the mid-intertidal zone, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006...............................................41 Table 5.4 Physical characteristics and water quality at intertidal survey locations, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006. .......................................45 Table 5.5 Qualitative assessment of macrophyte communities at intertidal survey locations, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006.............................46 Table 5.6 Results of regression analyses (n=13) conducted to test relationships between intertidal community metrics and distance from the pulpmill diffuser, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006................47 Table 5.7 Results of regression analyses conducted to test relationships between water quality, slope, and distance from the pulpmill diffuser, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006...........................................47 Table 5.8 Results of Spearman rank correlations (n=13) conducted among intertidal community metrics, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006............................................................................................................49 Table 5.9 Results of Spearman rank correlations (rs) among water quality variables, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006. .......................................50 Table 5.10 Results of Spearman rank correlations (rs) between intertidal invertebrate community metrics and water quality variables, Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four, June 2006. .............................................................50 Table 5.11 Summary of effects observed during EEM Cycles Three and Four on invertebrate communities in the mid-intertidal zone according to distance from the Elk Falls mill. ..............................................................52 Elk Falls EEM Cycle Four – Final iii Hatfield LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Mean daily production and effluent flows from 1985 to 2006 Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division. ............................................4 Figure 2.2 Location of Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division, on Discovery Passage, British Columbia...........................................................5 Figure 2.3 Mean daily biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and adsorbable organic halides (AOX) in effluent, Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division, 1985 to 2006. .....................7 Figure 3.1 Fish early life stage – topsmelt growth IC25 endpoints for Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division, EEM Cycle Four. ............................12 Figure 3.2 Fish early life stage – topsmelt survival LC50 endpoints for Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division, EEM Cycle Four. ..............12 Figure 3.3 Echinoderm tests - fertilization IC25 endpoints (± 95% confidence limits) for Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division, EEM Cycle Four...................................................................................................13 Figure 3.4 Dose response curves for Winter 2005 and Summer 2005 for Echinoderms, Catalyst Paper Corporation, Elk Falls Division, EEM Cycle Four...................................................................................................13
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylum Nemertea)
    THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Biology Chair: Dr. Qiristopher'Tudge m Dr.David C r. Jon L. Norenburg Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences JuK4£ __________ Date 2004 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 1 1 0 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1421360 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 1421360 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger ABSTRACT Most nemerteans are studied from poorly preserved museum specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylum-Wide Survey Reveals Multiple Independent Gains of Head Regeneration Ability in Nemertea
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/439497; this version posted October 11, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. A phylum-wide survey reveals multiple independent gains of head regeneration ability in Nemertea Eduardo E. Zattara1,2,5, Fernando A. Fernández-Álvarez3, Terra C. Hiebert4, Alexandra E. Bely2 and Jon L. Norenburg1 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA 2 Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 3 Institut de Ciències del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain 4 Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA 5 INIBIOMA, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Bariloche, RN, Argentina Corresponding author: E.E. Zattara, [email protected] Abstract Animals vary widely in their ability to regenerate, suggesting that regenerative abilities have a rich evolutionary history. However, our understanding of this history remains limited because regeneration ability has only been evaluated in a tiny fraction of species. Available comparative regeneration studies have identified losses of regenerative ability, yet clear documentation of gains is lacking. We surveyed regenerative ability in 34 species spanning the phylum Nemertea, assessing the ability to regenerate heads and tails either through our own experiments or from literature reports. Our sampling included representatives of the 10 most diverse families and all three orders comprising this phylum.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Study on Yininemertes Pratensis
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 852: 31–51 Morphological(2019) and molecular study on Yininemertes pratensis from... 31 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.852.32602 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Morphological and molecular study on Yininemertes pratensis (Nemertea, Pilidiophora, Heteronemertea) from the Han River Estuary, South Korea, and its phylogenetic position within the family Lineidae Taeseo Park1, Sang-Hwa Lee2, Shi-Chun Sun3, Hiroshi Kajihara4 1 National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon, South Korea 2 National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, Secheon, South Korea 3 Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Yushan Road 5, Qingdao 266003, China 4 Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan Corresponding author: Hiroshi Kajihara ([email protected]) Academic editor: Y. Mutafchiev | Received 21 December 2018 | Accepted 5 May 2019 | Published 5 June 2019 http://zoobank.org/542BA27C-9EDC-4A15-9C72-5D84DDFEEF6A Citation: Park T, Lee S-H, Sun S-C, Kajihara H (2019) Morphological and molecular study on Yininemertes pratensis (Nemertea, Pilidiophora, Heteronemertea) from the Han River Estuary, South Korea, and its phylogenetic position within the family Lineidae. ZooKeys 852: 31–51. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.852.32602 Abstract Outbreaks of ribbon worms observed in 2013, 2015, and 2017–2019 in the Han River Estuary, South Korea, have caused damage to local glass-eel fisheries. The Han River ribbon worms have been identified as Yininemertes pratensis (Sun & Lu, 1998) based on not only morphological characteristics compared with the holotype and paratype specimens, but also DNA sequence comparison with topotypes freshly collected near the Yangtze River mouth, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Nemertea (Ribbon Worms)
    ISSN 1174–0043; 118 (Print) ISSN 2463-638X; 118 (Online) Taihoro Nukurc1n,�i COVERPHOTO: Noteonemertes novaezealandiae n.sp., intertidal, Point Jerningham, Wellington Harbour. Photo: Chris Thomas, NIWA. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF WATER AND ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH (NIWA) The Invertebrate Fauna of New Zealand: Nemertea (Ribbon Worms) by RAY GIBSON School of Biological and Earth Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street Liverpool L3 3AF, United Kingdom NIWA Biodiversity Memoir 118 2002 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Cataloguing in publication GIBSON, Ray The invertebrate fauna of New Zealand: Nemertea (Ribbon Worms) by Ray Gibson - Wellington : NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research) 2002 (NIWA Biodiversity memoir: ISSN 0083-7908: 118) ISBN 0-478-23249-7 II. I. Title Series UDC Series Editor: Dennis P. Gordon Typeset by: Rose-Marie C. Thompson National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) (incorporating N.Z. Oceanographic Institute) Wellington Printed and bound for NIWA by Graphic Press and Packaging Levin Received for publication - 20 June 2001 ©NIWA Copyright 2002 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ CONTENTS Page 5 ABSTRACT 6 INTRODUCTION 9 Materials and Methods 9 CLASSIFICATION OF THE NEMERTEA 9 Higher Classification CLASSIFICATION OF NEW ZEALAND NEMERTEANS AND CHECKLIST OF SPECIES .
    [Show full text]
  • Point Loma in 2008 Continued to Low Wave and Current Activity And/Or Physical Show No Spatial Patterns Relative to the Outfall Disturbance
    THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO Annual Receiving Waters Monitoring Report for the Point Loma Ocean Outfall 2008 City of San Diego Ocean Monitoring Program Metropolitan Wastewater Department Environmental Monitoring and Technical Services Division THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO June 30, 2009 Mr. John Robertus Executive Officer Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region 9771 Clairemont Mesa Blvd. Suite B San Diego, CA 92124 Attention: POTW Compliance Unit Dear Sir: Enclosed is the 2008 Annual Receiving Waters Monitoring Report for NPDES Permit No. CA0107409, Order No. R9-2002-0025 for the City of San Diego Point Lorna Wastewater Treatment Plant, Point Lorna Ocean Outfall. This report contains data summaries and statistical analyses for the various portions of the ocean monitoring program, including oceanographic conditions, microbiology, sediment characteristics, benthic macrofauna, demersal fish and megabenthic invertebrate communities, and bioaccumulation of contaminants in fish tissues. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, I certify that the information submitted is, to the best ofmy knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Sincerely, ALAN C. LANGWORTHY Deputy Metropolitan Wastewater Director ACL\ald Enclosures: 1. Annual Receiving Waters Monitoring Report 2. CD containing PDF file of this repo1i cc Depart1nent of Environmental Health, County of San Diego U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Lecithotrophic Pilidium Larva Illustrates Convergent Evolution of Trochophore-Like Morphology Marie K
    Hunt and Maslakova Frontiers in Zoology (2017) 14:7 DOI 10.1186/s12983-017-0189-x RESEARCH Open Access Development of a lecithotrophic pilidium larva illustrates convergent evolution of trochophore-like morphology Marie K. Hunt and Svetlana A. Maslakova* Abstract Background: The pilidium larva is an idiosyncrasy defining one clade of marine invertebrates, the Pilidiophora (Nemertea, Spiralia). Uniquely, in pilidial development, the juvenile worm forms from a series of isolated rudiments called imaginal discs, then erupts through and devours the larval body during catastrophic metamorphosis. A typical pilidium is planktotrophic and looks like a hat with earflaps, but pilidial diversity is much broader and includes several types of non-feeding pilidia. One of the most intriguing recently discovered types is the lecithotrophic pilidium nielseni of an undescribed species, Micrura sp. “dark” (Lineidae, Heteronemertea, Pilidiophora). The egg-shaped pilidium nielseni bears two transverse circumferential ciliary bands evoking the prototroch and telotroch of the trochophore larva found in some other spiralian phyla (e.g. annelids), but undergoes catastrophic metamorphosis similar to that of other pilidia. While it is clear that the resemblance to the trochophore is convergent, it is not clear how pilidium nielseni acquired this striking morphological similarity. Results: Here, using light and confocal microscopy, we describe the development of pilidium nielseni from fertilization to metamorphosis, and demonstrate that fundamental aspects of pilidial development are conserved. The juvenile forms via three pairs of imaginal discs and two unpaired rudiments inside a distinct larval epidermis, which is devoured by the juvenile during rapid metamorphosis. Pilidium nielseni even develops transient, reduced lobes and lappets in early stages, re-creating the hat-like appearance of a typical pilidium.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Interim Receiving Waters Monitoring Report
    POINT LOMA OCEAN OUTFALL MONTHLY RECEIVING WATERS INTERIM RECEIVING WATERS MONITORING REPORT FOR THE POINTM ONITORINGLOMA AND SOUTH R EPORTBAY OCEAN OUTFALLS POINT LOMA 2020 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT NPDES Permit No. CA0107409 SDRWQCB Order No. R9-2017-0007 APRIL 2021 Environmental Monitoring and Technical Services 2392 Kincaid Road x Mail Station 45A x San Diego, CA 92101 Tel (619) 758-2300 Fax (619) 758-2309 INTERIM RECEIVING WATERS MONITORING REPORT FOR THE POINT LOMA AND SOUTH BAY OCEAN OUTFALLS 2020 POINT LOMA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (ORDER NO. R9-2017-0007; NPDES NO. CA0107409) SOUTH BAY WATER RECLAMATION PLANT (ORDER NO. R9-2013-0006 AS AMENDED; NPDES NO. CA0109045) SOUTH BAY INTERNATIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (ORDER NO. R9-2014-0009 AS AMENDED; NPDES NO. CA0108928) Prepared by: City of San Diego Ocean Monitoring Program Environmental Monitoring & Technical Services Division Ryan Kempster, Editor Ami Latker, Editor June 2021 Table of Contents Production Credits and Acknowledgements ...........................................................................ii Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................1 A. Latker, R. Kempster Chapter 1. General Introduction ............................................................................................3 A. Latker, R. Kempster Chapter 2. Water Quality .......................................................................................................15 S. Jaeger, A. Webb, R. Kempster,
    [Show full text]
  • Cerebratulus Marginatus Class: Anopla, Heteronemertea
    Phylum: Nemertea Cerebratulus marginatus Class: Anopla, Heteronemertea A ribbon worm Order: Family: Lineidae Taxonomy: Cerebratulus marginatus was Mouth: Ventral and behind the brain and dis- described by Renier (1804) from Naples, Ita- tinct from proboscis pore (order Heteronemer- ly. This species now has a worldwide distri- tea) (Kozloff 1974). bution and an extensive list of synonyms Proboscis: Eversible (phylum Nemertea) (see Gibson 1995). Thus it is very likely that and, when not everted, coiled inside rhyncho- there are several different species currently coel (cavity). Proboscis of moderately size referred to as C. marginatus from differing with sticky glandular surface is everted less regions. readily than in C. californiensis. Proboscis bears no stylet (class Anopla) (Kozloff 1974). Description Tube/Burrow: An excellent swimmer and Size: Among the largest of local nemerte- strong burrower, C. marginatus does not in- ans, where sizes range from 50 cm to 1 m in habit a permanent tube or burrow. length and up to 15 mm in width (Coe 1901, 1905). Possible Misidentifications Color: Slate brown, dark grey or grayish Eight Cerebratulus species are report- green (Coe 1901). Individuals vary in color; ed from central CA to OR (Roe et al. 2007). locally they can be very dark brown. Some- Species in this genus have firm, non- times more pale ventrally, thin lateral mar- contractile and often ribbon-like bodies. One gins often colorless or white (Coe 1901, species that is easily mistaken for C. margina- 1905). tus is C. californiensis. Both are slate colored General Morphology: Large, thick and and possess thin lateral margins that are col- round worm anteriorly but very flat and rib- orless or white.
    [Show full text]
  • Nemertea: Heteronemertea)
    Tropical Natural History 19(1): 39–42, April 2019 2019 by Chulalongkorn University Short Note Anterior Regeneration in Baseodiscus hemprichii (Nemertea: Heteronemertea) HIROSHI KAJIHARA1* AND NATSUMI HOOKABE2 1Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, JAPAN 2Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, JAPAN * Corresponding Author: Hiroshi Kajihara ([email protected]) Received: 19 September 2018; Accepted: 19 December 2018 Nemerteans are mostly marine, benthic, 19516; the latter is a triploid hybrid between carnivorous invertebrates, chiefly feeding on the former and Lineus lacteus (Rathke, polychaetes, small crustaceans, and 1843)7. Four additional species — mollusks1,2. They comprise the phylum Baseodiscus delineatus (Delle Chiaje, 1825), Nemertea, with about 1,300 species known Cerebratulus lineolatus Coe, 1905, from the world oceans3. It is known for Tubulanus polymorphus Renier, 1804, and many species that nemerteans can Tubulanus sexlineatus (Griffin, 1898) — regenerate posterior end of body after have been reported to possess the head- amputation. However, body fragments regenerative potential8,9. In addition, limited without head usually disintegrate within a anterior regenerative potential was reported few days or a few weeks4. Asexual for Lineus pictifrons Coe, 1904 and Lineus reproduction by fragmentation has been rubescens Coe, 190410,11. The record for the confirmed in Lineus sanguineus (Rathke, freshwater Prostoma12 appears to be 1799)5 and Lineus pseudolacteus Gontcharoff, doubtful8. FIGURE 1. Map showing known localities of Baseodiscus hemprichii. A, Egypt13; B, Sudan14; C, Tanzania15; D, Mozanbique15; E, Coëtivy Island16; F, Mauritius17; G, Pakistan18,19; H, India20,21; I, Thailand22; J, Vietnam23,24; K, Taiwan25; L, Indonesia26; M, Japan27–30; N, Caroline Islands15; O, Australia31; P, Papua New Guinea15; Q, New Caledonia32,33; R, Samoa15; S, Easter Island34 40 TROPICAL NATURAL HISTORY.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Rediscovery of Baseodiscus Hemprichii (Ehrenberg, 1831) (Nemerteam, Anapla, Baseodiscidae) From
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquatic Commons Pakistan Journal of Marine Sciences, Vol.3(1), 79·82, 1994 NOTES AND NEWS ON THE REDISCOVERY OF BASEODISCUS IIEMPRICHII (EHRENBERG, 1831) (NEMERTEA, ANOPLA, BASEODISCIDAE) FROM KARACHI WATERS Quddusi B. Kazmi and Ray Gibson Marine Reference Collection and Resource Centre, University ofKaraclli, Karachi-75270, Pakistan (QBK); School of Biological and Earth Sciences, Liverpool Jolm Moores University, Liverpool, U.K. (RG). During a study of biodiversity on the Pakistan coast several species of nemerteans were encountered. One is uncertainly identified as Lineus ruber (Muller, 1774), the identification of another is Wider way. A third, Baseodiscus hemprichii,. has previously been recorded from Karachi by Puri (1924). He gave a detailed description of his specimens, but no illustrations, and noted that "The external characters of this worm resemble those of Eupolia hemprichi." Baseodiscus edmondsoni Coe, 1934, described from the Hawaiian Islands (Coe, 1934, 1947) may be conspecific with our material. Baseodiscus hemprichii has tJeen collected many times from rocky. areas on the Karachi coast, but on only one occasion was it photographed and then drawn. The specimen illustrated was collected from a rocky beach at Jhopri Point on 14 OCtober, 1985. The species is briefly described here. Base(Jdisctls hemprichii (Ehrenberg, 1831) (Fig. l) Nemerteshemprichii Ehrenberg, 1831:64 Borlasia hemprichii Diesing, 1850: 240, 1862: 249 Eupolia brockii Burger, 1890: 22 Eupolia mediolineata Burger, 1893: 230; 1895a: 603, 1895b: 27 Eupolia hemprichi Burger, 1895a: 603; 1895b: 26; Staub,•l900: 97; Purl; 1.924: 72; Gravely, 1927: 53; Patel et al., 1976: 663.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramphogordius Sanguineus Class: Anopla, Heteronemertea
    Phylum: Nemertea Ramphogordius sanguineus Class: Anopla, Heteronemertea Order: Family: Lineidae Taxonomy: The species now known as 1943; Riser 1994). Ramphogordius sanguineus was originally Trunk: described as Planaria sanguinea in 1799 by Posterior: No caudal cirrus. Rathke. It was transferred to the genus Eyes/Eyespots: Three to eight reddish brown Lineus (L. sanguineus) by McIntosh in 1873 ocelli present within both cephalic grooves, and has been synonymized with several lin- but not necessarily in equal numbers on each eid taxa since then, including L. nigricans, L. side (Coe 1943; Riser 1994; Hayward 1995; socialis, L. ruber, L. vegetus and L. pseudo- Roe et al. 2007; Caplins 2011). lactues (Bierne et al. 1993; Riser 1994). Mouth: Ventral and behind the brain and dis- Riser (1994) designated the genus Myoiso- tinct from proboscis pore (order Heteronemer- phagos for L. lacteus, L. pseudolacteus and tea) (Kozloff 1974). L. sanguineus, a genus name which was lat- Proboscis: Eversible (phylum Nemertea) er determined to be invalid and species and, when not everted, coiled inside rhyncho- were reassigned to the genus Ramphogordi- coel (cavity). Proboscis wraps around prey, us (Riser 1998; Runnels 2013). possibly delivering an immobilizing toxin (Caplins 2011) and is also everted when dis- Description turbed. Size: Individuals 0.5–15 cm in length (Roe Tube/Burrow: None. et al. 2007) and 0.5–2 mm in width (Coe 1943; Riser 1994). Possible Misidentifications Color: Smaller individuals tend to be whitish Ramphogordius sanguineus is the on- grey, while larger ones are variously olive, ly member of this genus known to exist locally red, brown, or green (Coe 1943; Riser (Roe et al.
    [Show full text]