DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Table of Contents Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................................i Introduction.........................................................................................................................................1 A. Legal Standards.........................................................................................................8 B. Other Factors Contributing to the Killings..............................................16 C. Summary of Conclusions.................................................................................22 D. Recommendations...............................................................................................25 Chapter One The Rules of Engagement.........................................................................................................29 A. General Operation of the Rules.....................................................................30 B. In Life-Threatening Situations ......................................................................32 C. The Procedures for Apprehending Suspects.......................................34 1. Shooting Persons Wearing Masks............................................36 2. Examples of Killings While Apprehending Suspects...................................................39 D. Plastic Bullets.........................................................................................................44 Chapter Two Official Investigations.................................................................................................................57 A. Introduction...............................................................................................................57 B. The IDF's Mechanisms for Investigating Killings...........................................................................................................64 1. Debriefings and Operational Reports.....................................65 2. Investigators Specially Appointed by Senior Commanders ..................................................... 71 3. Criminal Investigation Division (CID)......................................72 4. After the CID Investigation: Action by the Prosecutor...................................................75 5. Appealing Decisions Not to Prosecute...................................76 6. Courts-Martial and Disciplinary Trials................................................................. 77 C. The CID Investigations: Seven Major Deficiencies...................................................................78 1. Inadequate Efforts to Obtain Palestinian Testimony........................................................79 a. Procedures for Accepting Civilian Complaints ..........................................88 b. The Perception of Palestinians as Liars.........................................91 2. Inadequate Cooperation with Nongovernmental Organizations and Other Intermediaries............................ 93 a. UNRWA and Investigations..........................................97 3. Slow Pace of Investigation .........................................................100 4. Understaffing at the Criminal Investigation Division......................................................108 5. Inadequate Response to Requests for Information About Investigations............................. 111 a. Autopsies.............................................................................117 6. Failure to Seek Medical Evidence When Autopsies Are Not Possible.............................129 7. The Appearance of Partiality...................................................... 137 a. Soldiers Reporting on Other Soldiers....................................................143 b. Greater Independence for the Investigative Process....................................145 D. The Givati Trial.......................................................................................................149 1. The Court-Martial................................................................................151 2. The Verdict............................................................................................152 Chapter Three Independent Human Rights Monitoring ....................................................................... 161 A. Access to Events...................................................................................................164 1. Israelis and Foreigners .................................................................164 2. Palestinians..........................................................................................171 B. Extrajudicial Sanctions against Palestinian Monitors........................................................................... 173 C. Censorship.............................................................................................................. 176 1. Israeli and Foreign Press.............................................................. 176 2. Palestinian Press.............................................................................. 178 D. Members of Knesset ......................................................................................... 179 E. Soldiers as Monitors..........................................................................................180 F. The Yehuda Meir Case.......................................................................................180 Appendix I: Cases........................................................................................................................ 187 Appendix II: IDF Response, Middle East Watch Rebuttal, and Further IDF Response ..........................................213 INTRODUCTION This report examines three aspects of Israeli policy that have contributed to the excessive number of Palestinians killed during the intifada. These policies are reflected in the rules issued to Israeli troops operating in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip on when they can open fire, which Middle East Watch finds to be unduly permissive; the procedures followed by the Israel Defense Force (IDF) to investigate and punish troop misconduct against Palestinians, which Middle East Watch finds to be ineffective; and the restrictions imposed by the IDF on independent bodies attempting to monitor its conduct in the occupied territories, which Middle East Watch finds to be unjustified. Middle East Watch urges immediate modification of these policies to reduce the number of Palestinians killed unjustifiably at the hands of Israeli troops and to ensure that Israeli use of lethal force in the occupied territories is made consistent with internationally recognized standards of necessity and proportionality. During the first 31 months of the intifada, Israeli security forces1 killed over 670 Palestinians and injured many thousands more.2 Israeli 1 We use the term "security forces" to include all Israeli state agents: IDF troops; the Border Police, which is institutionally part of Israel's Police Ministry but operates in the occupied territories under the direction of the IDF; and the General Security Service (Shin Bet). Although a statistical breakdown is not available, the vast majority of killings by security forces in the territories have been inflicted by the IDF. 2 Unless otherwise noted, the statistics used in this report are those reported by the human rights organization B'Tselem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories. 1 authorities lay the blame for these casualties on the Palestinians, arguing that their violent resistance to Israeli troops has necessitated a forceful response to restore and maintain order. Officials claim that, with few exceptions, soldiers have responded to constant dangers and provocations with great restraint and with no more force than appropriate. Our investigation found that, to the contrary, Israeli policies all too often encouraged a lack of restraint by IDF troops. This conclusion was reached after extensive interviews with witnesses to the use of lethal force by Israeli troops; Palestinian and Israeli lawyers who have represented the families of those killed by the IDF; representatives of Palestinian, Israeli and other human rights organizations; five IDF reserve soldiers and officers; and several senior IDF representatives.3 With regard to the number of Palestinians killed by the gunfire of security forces during the intifada, there is not much disparity between official and independent figures. There are wider discrepancies between official and independent tallies of casualties due to causes other than bullets, such as beatings and tear gas. The IDF acknowledges responsibility for very few non- shooting deaths, while B'Tselem counts 34 inflicted by security forces through June 30, 1990. In addition, B'Tselem has counted more than 80 Palestinians who died shortly after exposure to tear gas, although it acknowledges that, from a medical standpoint, it is difficult to determine whether tear gas was the direct cause of death. (B'Tselem press release, July 1, 1990.) The IDF claims that no causal link has been demonstrated between the use of tear gas and a single Palestinian death. (Paul Adams, "Children in the Front Line," Middle East International, May 25, 1990.) 3 The IDF representatives interviewed by Middle East Watch included the Chief Military Prosecutor, the Deputy Judge Advocate-General, the commander of the Criminal Investigation Division (CID), the head of the IDF's International
Recommended publications

  • News. in Brief

    \ \ i " • _r' - ..,," • ",,' ;,-,. _, __ 'e" __ .' •• ,1t~.fr~ii":F'~--$*';':f\~~~ ......x. _fA .~ - ~ ~.,,=~. '" ;'-'~"'~")~}.";.;'.--...,,-,,: :-)","".":': ';.:- ...:s_-:)·:~'j·::·~:;-:~~~~-";'~~E:): ,.:\_: :"""<"':"'::-' .t"::' ~,:, ,.... -:.-'':''7'.-."'. -' - , .:: it. ~, ..... ,.1<- . .,," _.'" . c.".,"';", •. , ~ .., '-, -, ',- ,. ~ ....,. 3'- . .- -... .,.. .... , -_ .. - - :-.. ~-".~-. ,..... '? '. ( :~t; .~ • , }~j,i r , . , '. 16 - THE JEWISH POST, n;ursciay. December 14,1978 ,. ..' ' . , .. -.-'" .....:. .; i . " ! '-~--""'-"-'" News., in Brief. , Jerusalem (JCNS) - Israeli security forces using bulldozers knOCked down the homes of two West Bank men, both accused of terrorist ac- tivities, '.. ,.\ , . One of the' houses, in WUwan village, north of Jerusalem,. near , , Ramallah, was owned by Akram Abdulah Rabm!lD, accused of heading ! :. a polltical assassination squad which murdered' prominent West Bank ~.,'. /' " , \ residents. for allegedly co-operating with· Israel. Rahnianwasd!1,~ined .~~t1~~i~t'~ii,<:\;~:'> r/" . I ! ~, some months ago.' ,';·,d" , ._ ..... _, ..... ,., ..: .. 'f /.,.j I The owner o{.the.,9therjlouse, i!!. a '1llagE!near Na,blus,is th9ught to .' " Oli/est and Lsrgiist'i/fnYlo4ewlsh W6Bk~1i1W"stern C~ada ',., .• '. ' Ii'® J v' 'j'; • ~ havefl¢d to' Jo~n' after three .0thEir·iJ!emhers'0( his group Were Candia lighting tlma FrldaYls":1~ p.m;' .Shabbat encis:,5:20 p.m. By mall In Western Canada $10 / ~ , .j arrested. .' ", .. , , .' ... ' ... ' '. '. ' '~.- "'.' '" ,.." Vol. UV No. 47-48 21. 1978 21 Days In Kisiev , .;:;;: " · 'Felicia Langer, the Israeli Communist lawyer, obtained a Supreme WU\~"'IPEG. THURSDAV',I?E~EIIII~ER 'b ". /'. /' Court stay on the demolitions, but by the time she notified the military authorities, the demolitions had already been carried out. , Mter the demolitions, the villagers complained to the Red Cross and . , ~. ,/ :, newspapermen, while women danced and chanted .slligansiri support of i . Yasser Arafat, the Palestine Liberation Organization.Jeader.
  • Joint Alternative Report Submitted by The

    Joint Alternative Report Submitted by The

    Joint Alternative Report submitted by the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) and Al-Haq to the Human Rights Committee on the occasion of the consideration of the Third Periodic Report of Israel Israel’s violations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with regard to house demolitions, forced evictions and safe water and sanitation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel Submitted June 2010 COHRE and Al-Haq are independent non-governmental organisations in UN ECOSOC Special Consultative Status Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................3 2. ISRAEL’S LEGAL OBLIGATIONS IN THE OPT........................................4 3. FORCED EVICTIONS AND HOUSE DEMOLITIONS .............................6 3.1 Punitive House Demolitions..................................................................................6 3.1.1 West Bank ......................................................................................................6 3.1.2 Gaza .............................................................................................................11 3.2 Administrative House Demolitions......................................................................16 3.2.1 West Bank...................................................................................................16 3.2.2 Israel: Mixed Cities.....................................................................................24 3.3. Other Forced Evictions......................................................................................25
  • The Audacity of Holiness Orthodox Jewish Women’S Theater עַ זּוּת שֶׁ Israelבִּ קְ Inדוּשָׁ ה

    The Audacity of Holiness Orthodox Jewish Women’S Theater עַ זּוּת שֶׁ Israelבִּ קְ Inדוּשָׁ ה

    ׁׁ ְִֶַָּּּהבשות שעזּ Reina Rutlinger-Reiner The Audacity of Holiness Orthodox Jewish Women’s Theater ַעזּּו ֶׁת ש in Israelִּבְקּדו ָׁשה Translated by Jeffrey M. Green Cover photography: Avigail Reiner Book design: Bethany Wolfe Published with the support of: Dr. Phyllis Hammer The Hadassah-Brandeis Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA Talpiot Academic College, Holon, Israel 2014 Contents Introduction 7 Chapter One: The Uniqueness of the Phenomenon 12 The Complexity of Orthodox Jewish Society in Israel 16 Chapter Two: General Survey of the Theater Groups 21 Theater among ultra-Orthodox Women 22 Born-again1 Actresses and Directors in Ultra-Orthodox Society 26 Theater Groups of National-Religious Women 31 The Settlements: The Forge of Orthodox Women’s Theater 38 Orthodox Women’s Theater Groups in the Cities 73 Orthodox Men’s Theater 79 Summary: “Is there such a thing as Orthodox women’s theater?” 80 Chapter Three: “The Right Hand Draws in, the Left Hand Pushes Away”: The Involvement of Rabbis in the Theater 84 Is Innovation Desirable According to the Torah? 84 Judaism and the Theater–a Fertile Stage in the Culture War 87 The Goal: Creation of a Theater “of Our Own” 88 Differences of Opinion 91 Asking the Rabbi: The Women’s Demand for Rabbinical Involvement 94 “Engaged Theater” or “Emasculated Theater”? 96 Developments in the Relations Between the Rabbis and the Artists 98 1 I use this term, which is laden with Christian connotations, with some trepidation. Here it refers to a large and varied group of people who were not brought up as Orthodox Jews but adopted Orthodoxy, often with great intensity, later in life.
  • Views Or Conclusions

    Views Or Conclusions

    The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 181 THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 181 The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa The American Public and Israel in the Twenty-First Century Eytan Gilboa © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel. 972-3-5318959 Fax. 972-3-5359195 [email protected] www.besacenter.org ISSN 0793-1042 October 2020 Cover image: Sheri Hooley via Unsplash The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is an independent, non-partisan think tank conducting policy-relevant research on Middle Eastern and global strategic affairs, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and regional peace and stability. It is named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace laid the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re-publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Publication of a work by BESA signifies that it is deemed worthy of public consideration but does not imply endorsement of the author’s views or conclusions. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East.
  • Turkish Policy Towards Israel and Palestine : Continuity Change in the Relations of Turkish

    Turkish Policy Towards Israel and Palestine : Continuity Change in the Relations of Turkish

    Palestinian-Israeli triangle under the rule of Justice and Development Party (AKP) (2002-2016) policy towards Israel and Palestine : Continuity change in the relations of Turkish- Turkish The AKP’s material and ideological interests have been used as a ‘goal’ and also as a ‘tool’. This means that whenever the AKP government is threatened and confronted with internal or external troubles, these interests can move from being a ‘goal’ to be used as a ‘means’ to consolidate AKP’s power. In the case of stability, Turkish policy towards Israel and Palestine these interests can be seen in the context of being a ‘goal’, which the AKP is Continuity and change in the relations of the Turkish- looking forward to achieve. This AKP pragmatic policy is called exploitation-via- Palestinian-Israeli triangle under the rule of the Justice and cooperation. Development Party (AKP) (2002-2016) Mohammed Alsaftawi Mohammed Alsaftawi is a researcher at the Ghent Institute for International Studies at the Department of Political Science, Ghent University. Mohammed Alsaftawi Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Supervised by Prof. Dries Lesage Faculty of Political and Social Sciences Department of Political Science Turkish policy towards Israel and Palestine: Continuity and change in the relations of the Turkish- Palestinian-Israeli triangle under the rule of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) (2002-2016) Doctoral dissertation submitted by: Mohammed Alsaftawi in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Supervised by Prof. Dries Lesage Academic Year 2016-2017 January 2017, Ghent Belgium Samenvatting Het Turks buitenlandsbeleid is een beladen onderwerp, bestudeerd door verscheiden academici.
  • Israel and Torture Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Summer, 1977), Pp

    Israel and Torture Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Summer, 1977), Pp

    Israel and Torture Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Summer, 1977), pp. 191-219 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Institute for Palestine Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2535792 Accessed: 09-03-2015 20:14 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Institute for Palestine Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Palestine Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 66.134.128.11 on Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:14:33 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SPECIAL DOCUMENT Israel and Torture [The followingthree documents are takenfrom the leadingquality Sunday newspaper in GreatBritain, the Sunday Times. The firstconsists of theresults of a specialinvestigation by the SundayTimes' "Insight" sectioninto allegationsthat the State of Israel employstorture as a techniqueof interrogationof detainees. The second documentis the replyof the Israeli Embassyin London thefollowing week to theInsight report. The finaldocument constitutes the replyof the SundayTimes Insight team to the Israeli criticisms.] 1. THE "INSIGHT REPORT," going to die," Courvoisier told friends JUNE 19,1977.
  • Mancom Israel Centre

    Mancom Israel Centre

    MANCOM OCTOBER ISRAEL CENTRE ()*+ Members of Knesset visit A delegation of Members of Knesset had an official visit (August) to South Africa. Organized jointly by the Knesset and The Jewish Agency in partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the South African Jewish community, the trip included high-level meetings with leaders from throughout South African society, as well as a series of meetings and visits aimed at deepening the Israeli lawmakers’ familiarity with South African Jewry. During their time in South Africa, the five Members of Knesset— representing both the coalition and the opposition—met with senior political figures from across the political spectrum. While in Johannesburg, the lawmakers met with the leaders of the local Jewish community and with Jewish Agency representatives, as well as with families who are about to immigrate to Israel. They also KDL and met with Jewish students, youth movement leaders, and alumni of Masa Israel Journey. In Cape Town, the MKs visited the South African Jewish Museum, the Holocaust Centre, and the local Herzlia School, and celebrated Shabbat at the Cape Town Hebrew Congregation (Gardens Shul). Throughout their time in South Africa, the delegates were accompanied by representatives of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies, the South African Zionist Federation, IUA-UCF (Keren Hayesod), and the Embassy of Israel in Pretoria, who helped organize the visit. Member of Knesset Dr. Nachman Shai (Zionist Union), who co-chairs the Knesset Caucus for Strengthening the Jewish World and led the delegation, said: “The delegation’s visit and meetings with the Jewish community dealt with the ties that bind the Jewish people worldwide, including Israel and the South African Jewish community.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 Amnesty International's Concerns ..................................................................................... 3 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 5 Arrests and detentions ........................................................................................................ 7 ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES ................................................................ 9 Regulations governing detention ........................................................................................ 9 The Landau Commission and the failure of judicial safeguards ................................. 11 Extending the guidelines or exceptional dispensations? ................................................ 14 Methods of torture ............................................................................................................ 15 Torture and ill-treatment: the practice ............................................................................. 17 THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY .................................................................................... 22 Regulations governing detention ...................................................................................... 22 Arbitrary political detentions in the Gaza Strip ..............................................................
  • Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: the Most Important Events Yasser

    Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: the Most Important Events Yasser

    Palestine 100 Years of Struggle: The Most Important Events Yasser Arafat Foundation 1 Early 20th Century - The total population of Palestine is estimated at 600,000, including approximately 36,000 of the Jewish faith, most of whom immigrated to Palestine for purely religious reasons, the remainder Muslims and Christians, all living and praying side by side. 1901 - The Zionist Organization (later called the World Zionist Organization [WZO]) founded during the First Zionist Congress held in Basel Switzerland in 1897, establishes the “Jewish National Fund” for the purpose of purchasing land in Palestine. 1902 - Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II agrees to receives Theodor Herzl, the founder of the Zionist movement and, despite Herzl’s offer to pay off the debt of the Empire, decisively rejects the idea of Zionist settlement in Palestine. - A majority of the delegates at The Fifth Zionist Congress view with favor the British offer to allocate part of the lands of Uganda for the settlement of Jews. However, the offer was rejected the following year. 2 1904 - A wave of Jewish immigrants, mainly from Russia and Poland, begins to arrive in Palestine, settling in agricultural areas. 1909 Jewish immigrants establish the city of “Tel Aviv” on the outskirts of Jaffa. 1914 - The First World War begins. - - The Jewish population in Palestine grows to 59,000, of a total population of 657,000. 1915- 1916 - In correspondence between Sir Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, and Sharif Hussein of Mecca, wherein Hussein demands the “independence of the Arab States”, specifying the boundaries of the territories within the Ottoman rule at the time, which clearly includes Palestine.
  • ISRAEL's TRUTH-TELLING WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY Inquest Faults

    ISRAEL's TRUTH-TELLING WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY Inquest Faults

    September 1991 IIISRAEL'''S TTTRUTH---T-TTTELLING WITHOUT AAACCOUNTABILITY Inquest Faults Police in Killings at Jerusalem HolyHoly Site But Judge Orders No Charges Table of Contents I. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Confrontation: Sequence of Events............................................................................................................................................................ 6 III. Judge Kama's Findings on Police Conduct.................................................................................................................................................... 8 IV. The Case for Prosecution ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 I. Introduction Middle East Watch commends the extensive investigation published by Israeli Magistrate Ezra Kama on July 18 into the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif killings. However, Middle East Watch is disturbed that, in light of evidence establishing criminal conduct by identifiable police officers, none of the officers involved in the incident has been prosecuted or disciplined. Middle East Watch also believes that the police's criminal investigation of the incident last fall was grossly negligent and in effect sabotaged the
  • Two Days in Palestine,’ Was Written in April 1989, Soon After a Brief Trip to the Occupied Territories with Some Colleagues

    Two Days in Palestine,’ Was Written in April 1989, Soon After a Brief Trip to the Occupied Territories with Some Colleagues

    Note The following essay, ‘Two Days in Palestine,’ was written in April 1989, soon after a brief trip to the occupied territories with some colleagues. It was published in two parts in the August 1989 (pp. 11–18) and September 1989 (pp. 21–27, 36) issues of The Message International (New York), the monthly magazine published by the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). The editors, in their wisdom, changed the title to ‘In the Eye of the Intifada, A Muslim’s Journey to the Land of Oppression;’ they also added pictures and inserts of their own. Here is the original text, with some minor corrections. The first Intifada began in December 1987 and is generally considered to have continued till the signing of the Oslo Accords in September 1993. During that time Israeli security forces killed 1070 Palestinians in the Occupied Territories (including East Jerusalem), including 237 minors; in addition 54 Palestinians, including 13 minors were killed by Israeli civilians. The Israeli casualties at the hands of the Palestinians during the same time were 47 civilians, including 3 minors, and 43 army personnel. (Source: B'tSelem, the Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories. <<http://www.btselem.org/english/statistics/first_Intifada_ Tables.asp>> as viewed on 10 April 2009.) (April 2009) 1 C. M. Naim Two Days In Palestine Introduction There were six of us in the group: five academics from the University of Chicago and one lawyer. Five males and one female. One of us was a devout Catholic, three claimed Islam as their religion, while the remaining two identified with Judaism.
  • 7.62×51Mm NATO 1 7.62×51Mm NATO

    7.62×51Mm NATO 1 7.62×51Mm NATO

    7.62×51mm NATO 1 7.62×51mm NATO 7.62×51mm NATO 7.62×51mm NATO rounds compared to AA (LR6) battery. Type Rifle Place of origin United States Service history In service 1954–present Used by United States, NATO, others. Wars Vietnam War, Falklands Conflict, The Troubles, Gulf War, War in Afghanistan, Iraq War, Libyan civil war, among other conflicts Specifications Parent case .308 Winchester (derived from the .300 Savage) Case type Rimless, Bottleneck Bullet diameter 7.82 mm (0.308 in) Neck diameter 8.77 mm (0.345 in) Shoulder diameter 11.53 mm (0.454 in) Base diameter 11.94 mm (0.470 in) Rim diameter 12.01 mm (0.473 in) Rim thickness 1.27 mm (0.050 in) Case length 51.18 mm (2.015 in) Overall length 69.85 mm (2.750 in) Rifling twist 1:12" Primer type Large Rifle Maximum pressure 415 MPa (60,200 psi) Ballistic performance Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy 9.53 g (147 gr) M80 FMJ 833.0 m/s (2,733 ft/s) 3,304 J (2,437 ft·lbf) 11.34 g (175 gr) M118 Long 786.4 m/s (2,580 ft/s) 3,506 J (2,586 ft·lbf) Range BTHP Test barrel length: 24" [1] [2] Source(s): M80: Slickguns, M118 Long Range: US Armorment 7.62×51mm NATO 2 The 7.62×51mm NATO (official NATO nomenclature 7.62 NATO) is a rifle cartridge developed in the 1950s as a standard for small arms among NATO countries. It should not to be confused with the similarly named Russian 7.62×54mmR cartridge.