A Comparison of Life Histories and Ecological

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Comparison of Life Histories and Ecological Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 A comparison of life histories and ecological aspects among snappers (Pisces: Lutjanidae) Fernando Martinez-Andrade Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Martinez-Andrade, Fernando, "A comparison of life histories and ecological aspects among snappers (Pisces: Lutjanidae)" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2271. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2271 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. A COMPARISON OF LIFE HISTORIES AND ECOLOGICAL ASPECTS AMONG SNAPPERS (PISCES: LUTJANIDAE) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State university and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences by Fernando Martinez-Andrade B.S., Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, 1992 M.S., Instituto Tecnologico y de Etudios Superiores de Monterrey, 1997 December 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I express my most sincere appreciation to my major Professor, Dr. Donald M. Baltz, who has directed with a positive and honest attitude all my efforts since the beginning of my doctoral studies. I also wish to recognize the rest of my doctoral committee members, Drs. Charles Wilson, Lawrence Rouse, J. Michael Fitzsimons, and Thomas H. Dietz for participating with valuable suggestions and the review of this manuscript. I thank Dr. John E. Randall for allowing me the unconditional use of his photographic collection of snappers. I express my gratitude to the Louisiana State University Libraries system for the fast and efficient acquisition of the enormous amount of publications needed for this study. FishBase (www.fishbase.org) was also an invaluable source of information and it is cited frequently throughout the manuscript. Financial support to finance my doctoral studies was provided by the Fulbright Foundation, the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) in México, the Louisiana State University Graduate School, the LSU Coastal Fisheries Institute, the U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service, and the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium (LUMCON) Foundation. I thank the LSU School of the Coast and the Environment and the Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences in particular for all the assistance provided and use of facilities during my stay in Baton Rouge. Finally I want to thank my wife, Sabina, for all her support through all these years and other fellow LSU students with whom I have shared so many important events in life. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………...ii LIST OF TABLES…….………………………………………………………..................v LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………………vi ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………….viii GENERAL INTRODUCTION………………………………..………………..….…..….1 CHAPTER 1 A BRIEF REVIEW OF LIFE-HISTORY CONCEPTS RELEVANT TO SNAPPERS…………………………………………………………………....5 2 COMPARISON OF LIFE-HISTORY FACTORS AMONG SNAPPERS…………………………………………………………………..14 Introduction………………………………………………………….…….…14 Methodology…………………………………………………………............19 Results…………………………………………………………………..........24 Discussion……………………………………………………………………48 3 COMPARISON OF SOME DISTRIBUTIONAL FACTORS AMONG SNAPPERS…………………………………………………………………..87 Introduction………………………………………………………………......87 Methodology……………………………………………………………...….91 Results……………………………………………………………………......92 Discussion………………………………………………...……………….....93 4 COMPARISON OF FEEDING HABITS AMONG SNAPPERS………….106 Introduction………………………………………………………………....106 Methodology……………………………………………………………..…107 Results………………………………………………………………………110 Discussion…………………………………………………………………..112 5 AN ANALYSIS OF LIFE-HISTORY, DISTRIBUTION AND PREY AMONG SNAPPERS………………………………………………………130 Introduction…………………………………………………………………130 Methodology………………………………………………………………..130 Results………………………………………………………………………132 Discussion…………………………………………………………………..133 BIBLIOGRAPHY.………………………………………………………………….......141 APPENDIX LENGTH CONVERSION FORMULAS…..…………………………….191 iii VITA……………………………………………………………………………………194 iv LIST OF TABLES 2.1 Mean values (± S D (N)) and range for ten variables reported in literature and overall (estimates included) for the family Lutjanidae …………..……….…………25 2.2 Correlation analysis of ten life-history variables in the initial and expanded databases for the family Lutjanidae……………………………………………….…26 2.3 Loadings, eigenvalues, and variance explained by factor from the Principal Component Analysis of life-history variables in the family Lutjanidae…..28 2.4 Mean values of the life-history variables for species and populations in the four subfamilies of the family Lutjanidae………….………………………………...42 2.5 Life-history variables available in literature and estimations for populations within species of snappers……………………………………………………....….53 3.1 Asymptotic length, vertical and latitudinal distribution, range, habitat selection and reproductive peak months for selected species of snappers………...…………..94 3.2 Mean asymptotic length, minimum depth, maximum depth, and latitudinal range by subfamily…………………………………………………………………..97 3.3 Partial listing of estuarine-dependent and estuarine-independent species of snappers……………………………………………………………………………..102 4.1 Inter-population differences and ontogenetic changes in the feeding habits of snappers and closely related species……………………………………………..113 4.2 Mean values of the diet categories for species of the subfamilies Lutjaninae and Etelinae……………………………………………………………………………..121 4.3 Correlation analysis among prey items found in the diets of snappers of the subfamilies Lutjaninae and Etelinae……………………………………………….123 4.4 Loadings, eigenvalues and variance explained by factor from the Principal Component Analysis of the categories in the diets of snappers of the subfamilies Lutjaninae and Etelinae…………………………………………………………..…123 5.1 Loadings, eigenvalues and variance explained by factor from the Principal Component Analysis of all ecological variables for snappers in all subfamilies……134 v LIST OF FIGURES 2.1 Life-history data for species in the family Lutjanidae……………………………...30 2.2 Life-history data for species in the subfamily Lutjaninae…..……………………...31 2.3 Life-history data for species in the families Paradicichthyinae, Etelinae and Apsilinae…………………………………………….……………………………...32 2.4 Length at maturity vs.asymptotic length in species of the subfamily Lujaninae....................................................................................................................37 2.5 Age at maturity vs. longevity in species of the subfamily Lutjaninae……......…….38 2.6 Growth rate vs. mortality rate in species of the subfamily Lutjaninae……………..39 2.7 Growth model of large, medium, and small species within the subfamily Lutjaninae…………………………………………………………………...……...40 2.8 Growth model of Lutjanus campechanus and L. adetii…………………..………….41 2.9 Length at maturity vs. asymptotic length in species of the subfamilies Paradicichthyinae, Etelinae and Apsilinae…………………………………….…..…49 2.10 Age at maturity vs. longevity in species of the subfamilies Paradicichthyinae, Etelinae and Apsilinae…………..………………………………………………….50 2.11 Growth rate vs. mortality rate in species of the subfamilies Paradicichthyinae, Etelinae and Apsilinae……………………………………...…..51 2.12 Growth model of the subfamilies Paradicichthyinae, Etelinae and Apsilinae….......52 2.12 Principal Component Analysis of the life-history data for species in the subfamilies Paradicichthyinae, Etelinae and Apsilinae…………………………….54 3.1 Maximum depth distribution for adults of most species of snappers in the four subfamilies……………………………………………………………….….98 3.2 Suggested life cycle for medium to large species of snappers……………..………104 4.1 Feeding habits in species of the subfamily Lutjaninae……………………………..124 4.2 Feeding habits in species of the subfamily Etelinae………………………………..125 4.3 Feeding habits of the subfamilies Lutjaninae and Etelinae and the family Haemulidae…………………………………………………………………………126 vi 4.4 Variation of feeding habits among snappers………………………………………..127 5.1 Variation of ecological factors among snappers……………………………………135 vii GENERAL INTRODUCTION Life-history variables influence the economic importance of individual species and are of obvious interest to the management of fisheries and other natural resources because they are fundamental determinants of population dynamics. To achieve a sustainable exploitation of any species, these variables must be considered and fully understood (Stearns 1980, Winemiller and Rose 1992). Studies of life-history variables for a particular population or species usually require direct on-site observation and sampling, which involves a considerable amount of time and effort from the scientists who plan and conduct these studies. The resulting publications of all this research have the primary purpose of serving the scientific community in the future by contributing to the scientific knowledge base. This study reviews most of the extensive information available for a fish family of world-wide importance, the snappers,
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Book (PDF)
    e · ~ e t · aI ' A Field Guide to Grouper and Snapper Fishes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Family: SERRANIDAE, Subfamily: EPINEPHELINAE and Family: LUTJANIDAE) P. T. RAJAN Andaman & Nicobar Regional Station Zoological Survey of India Haddo, Port Blair - 744102 Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Rajan, P. T. 2001. Afield guide to Grouper and Snapper Fishes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. (Published - Director, Z.5.1.) Published : December, 2001 ISBN 81-85874-40-9 Front cover: Roving Coral Grouper (Plectropomus pessuliferus) Back cover : A School of Blue banded Snapper (Lutjanus lcasmira) © Government of India, 2001 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher'S consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incorrect and should be unacceptable. PRICE Indian Rs. 400.00 Foreign $ 25; £ 20 Published at the Publication Division by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, 234/4, AJe Bose Road, 2nd MSO Building, (13th Floor), Nizam Palace, Calcutta-700 020 after laser typesetting by Computech Graphics, Calcutta 700019 and printed at Power Printers, New Delhi - 110002.
    [Show full text]
  • CAESIONIDAE Fusiliers by K.E
    click for previous page Perciformes: Percoidei: Caesonidae 2919 CAESIONIDAE Fusiliers by K.E. Carpenter iagnostic characters: Oblong to fusiform, moderately compressed, medium-sized to small (to about D50 cm) lutjanoid fishes; longitudinal axis from tip of snout to middle of caudal fin passing through centre of eye. Eye moderately large, its diameter longer than snout length. Mouth small and highly protrusible; 1 or 2 finger-like postmaxillary processes on dorsoposterior surface of premaxilla (Figs 1 and 2); angle of jaw oblique, about 40° to horizontal. Dentition variously reduced; small or minute conical teeth; premaxillae, vomer, and palatines with or without teeth. Caudal fin deeply forked. Margin of dorsal and anal fins more or less evenly sloping; third or fourth dorsal-fin spines longest; second or third anal-fin spines longest, remaining spines and rays gradually decreasing in length (except in Dipterygonotus with dorsal fin profile not evenly sloping, last IV-V dorsal-fin spines small and nearly separate, connected only at their bases by membrane, and dorsal-fin rays much longer than these spines). Dorsal fin with X to XV slender weak spines and 8 to 22 soft rays; anal fin with III spines and 9 to 13 soft rays;pelvicfins with I spine and 5 soft rays; pectoral fins with 16 to 24 rays; caudal fin distinctly forked, with pointed lobes. Branchiostegal rays 7. Scales moderate to small, weakly ctenoid; lateral-line scales 45 to 88; scale rows on body running horizontally; dorsal and anal fins with scales except for Gymnocaesio gymnoptera and Dipterygonotus balteatus. Ascending premaxillary process a separate ossification from premaxilla; ethmo-maxillary ligament absent; a separate A1’ section of the adductor mandibulae which originates on the subocular shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator-Prey Relations at a Spawning Aggregation Site of Coral Reef Fishes
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 203: 275–288, 2000 Published September 18 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Predator-prey relations at a spawning aggregation site of coral reef fishes Gorka Sancho1,*, Christopher W. Petersen2, Phillip S. Lobel3 1Department of Biology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 2College of the Atlantic, 105 Eden St., Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA 3Boston University Marine Program, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA ABSTRACT: Predation is a selective force hypothesized to influence the spawning behavior of coral reef fishes. This study describes and quantifies the predatory activities of 2 piscivorous (Caranx melampygus and Aphareus furca) and 2 planktivorous (Melichthys niger and M. vidua) fishes at a coral reef fish-spawning aggregation site in Johnston Atoll (Central Pacific). To characterize preda- tor-prey relations, the spawning behavior of prey species was quantified simultaneously with mea- surements of predatory activity, current speed and substrate topography. The activity patterns of pis- civores was typical of neritic, daylight-active fish. Measured both as abundance and attack rates, predatory activity was highest during the daytime, decreased during the late afternoon, and reached a minimum at dusk. The highest diversity of spawning prey species occurred at dusk, when pisci- vores were least abundant and overall abundance of prey fishes was lowest. The abundance and predatory activity of the jack C. melampygus were positively correlated with the abundance of spawning prey, and therefore this predator was considered to have a flexible prey-dependent activ- ity pattern. By contrast, the abundance and activity of the snapper A. furca were generally not corre- lated with changes in abundance of spawning fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Selected Genera of Lutjanidae Inferred from Mitochondrial Regions, with a Note on the Taxonomic Status of Pinjalo Pinjalo
    Ciencias Marinas (2013), 39(4): 349–361 http://dx.doi.org/10.7773/cm.v39i4.2287 C M Phylogenetic relationships of selected genera of Lutjanidae inferred from mitochondrial regions, with a note on the taxonomic status of Pinjalo pinjalo Relaciones filogenéticas de algunos géneros de la familia Lutjanidae inferidas a partir de regiones mitocondriales, con una nota sobre la taxonomía de Pinjalo pinjalo Cecilia Chu1, Mohammed Rizman-Idid1,2*, Chong Ving Ching1,2 1 Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, 50603 Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2 Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Phylogenetic relationships of 43 species in 11 genera, representing four subfamilies of the family Lutjanidae and two genera of the family Caesionidae, were inferred using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI). Further assessment using the mtDNA control region (CR) was carried out to infer the relationship between the Indian and western Pacific types of Lutjanus russellii collected from the coast of Peninsular Malaysia. A total of 11 and 12 species were sequenced for COI and CR genes, respectively. Clade formation reflects, to some extent, the species groupings based on morphological characteristics and their biogeography. The close phylogenetic relationship between Pinjalo pinjalo and the Lutjanus red snappers (Lutjanus malabaricus and Lutjanus sebae) warrants a taxonomic revision of the former as the two genera are currently separated based on non-exclusive morphological characters. A sequence divergence of 4.2% between the Indian and western Pacific types of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharkcam Fishes
    SharkCam Fishes A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower By Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie 1 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index Trevor Mendelow, designer of SharkCam, on August 31, 2014, the day of the original SharkCam installation. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition by Erin J. Burge, Christopher E. O’Brien, and jon-newbie is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For questions related to this guide or its usage contact Erin Burge. The suggested citation for this guide is: Burge EJ, CE O’Brien and jon-newbie. 2020. SharkCam Fishes. A Guide to Nekton at Frying Pan Tower. 5th edition. Los Angeles: Explore.org Ocean Frontiers. 201 pp. Available online http://explore.org/live-cams/player/shark-cam. Guide version 5.0. 24 February 2020. 2 Table of Contents Identification Images Species Profiles Additional Info Index TABLE OF CONTENTS SILVERY FISHES (23) ........................... 47 African Pompano ......................................... 48 FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION .............. 6 Crevalle Jack ................................................. 49 IDENTIFICATION IMAGES ...................... 10 Permit .......................................................... 50 Sharks and Rays ........................................ 10 Almaco Jack ................................................. 51 Illustrations of SharkCam
    [Show full text]
  • Training Manual Series No.15/2018
    DBTR-H D Indian Council of Agricultural Research Ministry of Science and Technology Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Department of Biotechnology CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual In the frame work of the project: DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals 2015-18 Training Manual This is a limited edition of the CMFRI Training Manual provided to participants of the “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals” organized by the Marine Biotechnology Division of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), from 2nd February 2015 - 31st March 2018. Principal Investigator Dr. P. Vijayagopal Compiled & Edited by Dr. P. Vijayagopal Dr. Reynold Peter Assisted by Aditya Prabhakar Swetha Dhamodharan P V ISBN 978-93-82263-24-1 CMFRI Training Manual Series No.15/2018 Published by Dr A Gopalakrishnan Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI) Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB.No:1603, Ernakulam North P.O, Kochi-682018, India. 2 Foreword Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi along with CIFE, Mumbai and CIFA, Bhubaneswar within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and Department of Biotechnology of Government of India organized a series of training programs entitled “DBT sponsored Three Months National Training in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology for Fisheries Professionals”. The scope of this training is to promote development of trained human resource for application of molecular tools to research problems in fisheries and aquaculture, to help them adapt to such facilities and work programs and to include analyses that comply with worldwide regulatory acts in the field of biotechnology.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Spermonde Archipelago, South Sulawesi
    Jurnal Iktiologi Indonesia, 10(1): 83-92, 2010 THE SNAPPER (LUTJANIDAE) OF SPERMONDE ARCHIPELAGO, SOUTH SULAWESI Andi Iqbal Burhanuddin1 and Yukio Iwatsuki2 1 Laboratory of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Hasanuddin University 2 Division of Fisheries Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University, Japan Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Hasanuddin University Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km 10 Makassar 90245 correspondence author e-mail: [email protected] Received: 12 Mei 2010, Accepted: 15 Juni 2010 ABSTRACT Fish diversity monitoring could be used as a basis for formulating management of the fisheries resources. This study was conducted to describe the snapper of the family Lutjanidae from the Spermonde Archipelago, South Sulawesi. Spe- cimens were collected in Rajawali and Paotere Fish Landing Port Makassar, South Sulawesi from November 2005 to August 2009. The result showed that there was 42 species representing eight genera of family Lutjanidae inhabiting the area were examined and identified: Aphareus furca, A. rutilans, Aprion virescens, Etelis carbunculus, E. radiosus, Lut- janus argentimaculatus, L. bengalensis, L. biguttatus, L. bohar, L. boutton, L. carponotatus, L. decussatus, L. fulvus, L. sebae, L. fulviflamma, L. fuscescens. L. johnii, L. kasmira, L. gibbus, L. lemniscatus, L. lunulatus, L. lutjanus, L. mala- baricus, L. monostigma, L. quinquelineatus, L. rivulatus, L. russelli, L. sebae, L. timorensis, L. vitta, Macolor macularis, M. niger, Paracaesio kusakarii, Pristipomoides argyrogrammicus, P. auricilla, P. filamentosus, P. flavipinnis, P. mul- tidens, P. typus, P. zonatus, Symphorichthys spilurus, S. nematophorus. The local name available of each species was given. Key words: Lutjanidae, Snapper, South Sulawesi, Spermonde. INTRODUCTION diversity monitoring and could hopefully be used Spermonde archipelago (Spermonde shelf) as a basic data for formulating management regu- located in the Southern Makassar Strait, south- lation of the fisheries resources for the Spermon- west coast of Sulawesi Island.
    [Show full text]
  • CAES Caes 6 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FAMILY
    click for previous page CAES Caes 6 1983 FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION SHEETS FAMILY : CAESIONIDAE FISHING AREA 51 (W. Indian Ocean) Caesio xanthonotus Bleeker, 1853 OTHER SCIENTIFIC NAMES STILL IN USE: None VERNACULAR NAMES: FAO : En - Yellowfin fusilier Fr - Fusilier aile jaune Sp - Fusilero aleta amarilla NATIONAL: DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERS: An oblong, moderately slender, fusiform, compressed fish (depth 2.8 to 3.4 times in standard length), with an oblique, small mouth and a deeply forked caudal fin. Dorsal profile concave in front of eye; eye moderately large; diameter of orbit greater than snout length; teeth minute, pointed, in 1 or 2 rows in jaws; vomer (on roof of mouth) with a narrow band of minute teeth. Dorsal fin with 10 slender, weak spines and 15 (rarely 14) soft rays; anal fin with 3 slender, weak spines and 12 (rarely 11) soft rays. Scales thin, 52 to 58 in lateral line; basal portion of dorsal and anal fins scaled; supratemporal bands of scales separated in the middle by a narrow scaleless area. Colour: generally sky blue on sides, grading to whitish (pink after death) on ventral region; most of back, upper part of head, dorsal fin, caudal peduncle, and caudal fin yellow; remainder of fins whitish; caudal fin without black tips or dark streaks on lobes; axil of pectoral fin base black. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERS OF SIMILAR SPECIES OCCURRING IN THE AREA: Caesio teres: blue on sides extends to nape and top of head. C. caerulaureus and C. striatus: a black, longitudinal streak present on middle of each caudal fir. lobe; a prominent yellow band from head to caudal fin Jading after death) in C.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations Biological Sciences Summer 2016 Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, and the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Linardich, Christi. "Hotspots, Extinction Risk and Conservation Priorities of Greater Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico Marine Bony Shorefishes" (2016). Master of Science (MS), Thesis, Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/hydh-jp82 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/biology_etds/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES by Christi Linardich B.A. December 2006, Florida Gulf Coast University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE BIOLOGY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Kent E. Carpenter (Advisor) Beth Polidoro (Member) Holly Gaff (Member) ABSTRACT HOTSPOTS, EXTINCTION RISK AND CONSERVATION PRIORITIES OF GREATER CARIBBEAN AND GULF OF MEXICO MARINE BONY SHOREFISHES Christi Linardich Old Dominion University, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Kent E. Carpenter Understanding the status of species is important for allocation of resources to redress biodiversity loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Fishes of Wake Atoll1
    Annotated Checklist ofthe Fishes ofWake Atoll 1 Phillip S. Lobel2 and Lisa Kerr Lobel 3 Abstract: This study documents a total of 321 fishes in 64 families occurring at Wake Atoll, a coral atoll located at 19 0 17' N, 1660 36' E. Ten fishes are listed by genus only and one by family; some of these represent undescribed species. The first published account of the fishes of Wake by Fowler and Ball in 192 5 listed 107 species in 31 families. This paper updates 54 synonyms and corrects 20 misidentifications listed in the earlier account. The most recent published account by Myers in 1999 listed 122 fishes in 33 families. Our field surveys add 143 additional species records and 22 new family records for the atoll. Zoogeo­ graphic analysis indicates that the greatest species overlap of Wake Atoll fishes occurs with the Mariana Islands. Several fish species common at Wake Atoll are on the IUCN Red List or are otherwise of concern for conservation. Fish pop­ ulations at Wake Atoll are protected by virtue of it being a U.S. military base and off limits to commercial fishing. WAKE ATOLL IS an isolated atoll in the cen­ and Strategic Defense Command. Conse­ tral Pacific (19 0 17' N, 1660 36' E): It is ap­ quentially, access has been limited due to the proximately 3 km wide by 6.5 km long and military mission, and as a result the aquatic consists of three islands with a land area of fauna of the atoll has not received thorough 2 approximately 6.5 km • Wake is separated investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew David Dorka Cobián Rojas Felicia Drummond Alain García Rodríguez
    CUBA’S MESOPHOTIC CORAL REEFS Fish Photo Identification Guide ANDREW DAVID DORKA COBIÁN ROJAS FELICIA DRUMMOND ALAIN GARCÍA RODRÍGUEZ Edited by: John K. Reed Stephanie Farrington CUBA’S MESOPHOTIC CORAL REEFS Fish Photo Identification Guide ANDREW DAVID DORKA COBIÁN ROJAS FELICIA DRUMMOND ALAIN GARCÍA RODRÍGUEZ Edited by: John K. Reed Stephanie Farrington ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by the NOAA Office of Ocean Exploration and Research under award number NA14OAR4320260 to the Cooperative Institute for Ocean Exploration, Research and Technology (CIOERT) at Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute-Florida Atlantic University (HBOI-FAU), and by the NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory under award number NA150AR4320064 to the Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies (CIMAS) at the University of Miami. This expedition was conducted in support of the Joint Statement between the United States of America and the Republic of Cuba on Cooperation on Environmental Protection (November 24, 2015) and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. National Park Service, and Cuba’s National Center for Protected Areas. We give special thanks to Carlos Díaz Maza (Director of the National Center of Protected Areas) and Ulises Fernández Gomez (International Relations Officer, Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment; CITMA) for assistance in securing the necessary permits to conduct the expedition and for their tremendous hospitality and logistical support in Cuba. We thank the Captain and crew of the University of Miami R/V F.G. Walton Smith and ROV operators Lance Horn and Jason White, University of North Carolina at Wilmington (UNCW-CIOERT), Undersea Vehicle Program for their excellent work at sea during the expedition.
    [Show full text]