DOCSLIB.ORG

David C. Cassidy Wins 2014 Abraham Pais Prize in This Issue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
David C. Cassidy Wins 2014 Abraham Pais Prize in This Issue A FORUM OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY • VOLUME XII • NO. 3 •FALL 2013 News of the Forum: David C. Cassidy Wins 2014 Abraham Pais Prize By Gloria B. Lubkin, Chair, 2014 Selection Committee he 2014 Abraham Pais Prize is awarded to David C. Cassidy “for his foundational studies on the history Tof quantum mechanics and his nuanced examinations of physics in Germany and the United States with special attention to the scientific work, personalities, and dilemmas of Heisenberg and Oppenheimer.” David Cassidy, a professor at Hofstra University in Hemp- stead, NY, has written two scientific biographies of Werner Heisenberg. The first, more scholarly volume, Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg (W. H. Freeman, New York, 1993), grew out of his doctoral dissertation and subse- quent years of research in Germany and other countries. That highly celebrated volume won both the 1993 Pfizer Award of the History of Science Society and the AIP Science Writ- ing Prize. The second volume, Beyond Uncertainty: Heisenberg, Quantum Physics, and the Bomb (Bellevue Literary Press, New York, 2009) was written for a broader audience, and includes fewer details of the development of quantum mechanics. However, the newer book includes information from the “Farm Hall” transcripts, which were only released in 1993. Cassidy also maintains a website on Heisenberg, http://www. aip.org/history/heisenberg/p01.htm. David C. Cassidy, 2014 Pais Prize recipient. Cassidy’s biography of Oppenheimer, J. Robert Oppen- heimer and the American Century (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2009) provides a rich sense of the cultural and historical contexts in which Oppenheimer lived. Cassidy In This Issue also wrote A Short History of Physics in the American Century 2014 Pais Prize Winner 1 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2011). With Gerald Holton and James Rutherford, Cassidy also wrote the under- graduate textbook Understanding Physics (Springer, 2002). Events at 2014 APS Meetings 3 Cassidy’s play, Farm Hall, based on the transcripts made of the captured German nuclear scientists in 1945, received a staged reading at the March 2013 APS meeting. Events at History of Science Society 4 Cassidy received BA and MS degrees from Rutgers and a PhD in physics from Purdue in 1976 in conjunction with the Crowdfunding Effort 4 Department of History of Science at the University of Wiscon- sin in Madison. He did a postdoc with John L. Heilbron at the University of California, Berkeley and then was a Humboldt Maria Goeppert Mayer 5 Fellow with Armin Hermann at the University of Stuttgart. He then became an assistant professor in history of science Pais Prize Lecture 6 at the University of Regensburg. Cassidy was Associate Edi- tor of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Volume I (“The Early Years”) and Volume II (“The Swiss Years: Writings”). He Daniel Kleppner Awarded Medal 12 has been at Hofstra University since 1990, where he is now professor of natural sciences. He has served FHP as secretary- treasurer (1995) and as chair (2008). New Books of Note 13 From the April 2013 APS Meeting FHP Chair Don Howard, Past Chair Peter Pesic, and APS Executive FHP Chair-Elect Brian Schwartz introducing staged reading of Officer President Kate Kirby at the FHP Executive Board meeting. “And the Sun Stood Still,” by Dava Sobel, a play about Nicholaus Copernicus. Forum on History of Physics The Forum on History of Physics OFFICERS & COMMITTEES 2013–2014 of the American Physical Society Forum Officers Program Committee publishes this Newsletter biannually at http://www.aps.org/units/fhp/newsletters/ Chair: Don Howard Chair: Brian Schwartz, Chair Chair-Elect: Brian Schwartz Co-Chair: Catherine Westfall index.cfm. If you wish to receive a Vice Chair: Catherine Westfall printed version of the Newsletter, Appointed: Past Chair: Peter Pesic please contact the editor. Each 3-year Fabio Bevilacqua Secretary-Treasurer: Cameron Reed Clayton Gearheart volume consists of six issues. Denis Weaire Forum Councilor The articles in this issue represent the Adrienne Kolb Michael Riordan views of their authors and are not necessarily those of the Forum or APS. Ex-officio: At Large Gregory Good on behalf of AIP Robert Crease Diana Kormos Buchwald on behalf of EPP Editor Danian Hu Peter Pesic on behalf of PIP Robert P. Crease Joseph Martin Catherine Westfall both co-chair and ex Department of Philosophy Paul Halpern officio on behalf of HSS FPS Stony Brook University Diana K. Buchwald Richard Staley Stony Brook, NY 11794 Fellowship Committee: [email protected] Director-CHP Chair: Catherine Westfall (631) 632-7570 Gregory Good Fred Goldhaber Michel Janssen David Kaiser Book Review Editor Newsletter Editor Allen Needell Michael Riordan Robert Crease [email protected] American Physical Society, One Physics Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740 2 Volume XII, No. 3 • Fall 2013 • History of Physics Newsletter Upcoming Events at the 2014 APS March and April Meetings APS Meeting, March 3-5, Denver, Colorado: Women and the Manhattan Project Co-sponsored by FHP and CSWP Monday, March 3, 2014 11:15 AM Session Chair: Margaret Murnane, University of Colorado, Bolder and JILA “The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II,” Denise Kiernan, Author, Touchstone/Simon & Schuster “Women and the Hanford Site,” Michele Gerber, Gerber Group Consulting Women at Oak Ridge gaseous diffusion plant “After the War: What Happened to the “The Role of Living History in the “Some problems in the competition of Women Scientists of the Manhattan Communication of Science to the high-temperature superconductivity Project,” Ruth Howes, Professor Emer- Public,” Susan Marie Frontczak, research during the late 1980s,” Bing ® ita of Physics and Astronomy, Ball State Storysmith Liu, Tsinghua University University “The Historical Role of the New York “A brief history of the Institute of Theo- “Preserving the Manhattan Project: Times in the Communication of Science retical Physics in the Chinese Academy Women at Work,” Cindy Kelly, Direc- to the Public,” Dennis Overbye, The of Sciences since 1978,” Jinyan Liu, Chi- tor, Atomic Heritage Foundation New York Times nese Academy of Sciences “On the Ordinary Genius of Laura Fer- Twentieth-Century Chinese Physi- APS Meeting, April 5-8, mi,” Olivia Fermi, On the Neutron Trail cists and Physics Co-sponsored by FHP and FIP Savannah, Georgia: The History of the Communication of Thursday, March 6, 2014 Science to the Public 2:30 PM Co-sponsored by FHP and FOEP The Many Worlds of Leo Szilard Wednesday, March 5, 2014 Session Chair: Danian Hu, The City Co-sponsored by FHP and FPS 8:00 AM College of New York, CUNY “The Many Worlds of Leo Szilard,” Session Chair: Brian Schwartz, Brook- “Chien-Shiung Wu: An Icon of Physi- William Lanouette, author of Genius in lyn College and The Graduate Center, cist and Woman Scientist in China,” the Shadows: A Biography of Leo Szilard, CUNY Yuelin Zhu, Harvard University the Man Behind the Bomb “The Establishment of Science Com- “Chinese physicists educated in the “Leo Szilard in Physics and Informa- munication for the Public at the Royal Great Britain during the first half of the tion,” Richard Garwin, IBM Institution” Frank Burnet, Emeritus 20th century,” Xiaodong Yin, Capital Professor of Science Communication, Normal University “Leo Szilard: Biologist and Peace-Mak- University of West of England er,” Matthew S. Meselson, Harvard “Mao and physics research in China “Displaying Science: The Exhibits Rev- in the 1950s-1960s: the H-bomb project olution in Science and Natural History and the Straton model,” Tian Yu Cao, Museums, 1900-1990,Karen Rader, Vir- Boston University Continues on page 11 ginia Commonwealth University Volume XII, No. 3 • Fall 2013 • History of Physics Newsletter 3 Upcoming Events at the 2013 Crowdfunding History of Science Society Effort for a biography FRIDAY NOVEMBER 22 3:45–5:45 p.m. of Richard Garwin Session F37: Paleontology as an Inter- national Endeavour in the Nineteenth By Tony Fainberg, and Twentieth Centuries Institute for Defense Analyses Session F40: Natural History and Natu- ral Philosophy in the Eighteenth Cen- tury: Two Arts or One? FRIDAY NOVEMBER 22 8:45–10:00 p.m Workshop F4: The Past, Present, and THURSDAY, Future of the Physical Sciences NOVEMBER 21, 2013 3:00–5:00 p.m. SATURDAY NOVEMBER 23 9:00–11: 45 a.m. Session T2: The Materiality of Words in Chemistry and Pharmacy Session Sa43: Chemists and Chemistry in the Nineteenth Century: A Session in FRIDAY NOVEMBER 22, 2013 Honor of Alan J. Rocke 7:30–8:45 a.m. he last newsletter announced the Session Sa46: Interrogating the Cosmos preparation of a crowdfunding Physical Science Forum Business with Mathematical Imaginings and Teffort to be launched soon: the Meeting Physical Intuitions, 1880-1965: Bridg- goal is to support a completed, pub- ing Disciplinary and Cultural Practices lished biography of Dr. Richard Gar- FRIDAY NOVEMBER 22, 2013 win, designer of the first thermonucle- 9:00–11: 45 a.m. SATURDAY NOVEMBER 23 ar device and arms control advocate for (includes break from 10:00 to 10:15) 1:30–3:30 p.m. over half a century. Preparations to this end have been made on the indiegogo. Session F6: Rethinking the Cold War Session Sa61: Foundations at the Philo- com site: a 60-day campaign to raise Scientist: Advisers, Activists, and sophical Turning-Points: Chronicling funds to support this project is planned Archetypes from Sputnik to Star Wars Conceptual Turns in Theories of Mod- to “go live” on November 1. Members ern Physics of the Forum on the History of Phys- Session F13: Fields, Waves, and Parti- ics (along with others, of course) are cles: Debates in Modern Physics Session Sa67: Chymistry and Life in encouraged to visit the indiegogo site Early Modern Europe after November 1, to search for the FRIDAY NOVEMBER 22 campaign titled “Richard Garwin Biog- 12:00–1:15 p.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chem 103, Section F0F Unit I
    Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Chem 103, Section F0F Nuclear Model of the Atom Unit I - An Overview of Chemistry Dalton’s theory proposed that atoms were indivisible particles. Lecture 4 • By the late 19th century, this aspect of Dalton’s theory was being challenged. • Work with electricity lead to the discovery of the electron, • Some observations that led to the nuclear model as a particle that carried a negative charge. for the structure of the atom • The modern view of the atomic structure and the elements • Arranging the elements into a (periodic) table 2 Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Nuclear Model of the Atom Nuclear Model of the Atom The cathode ray In 1897, J.J. Thomson (1856-1940) studies how cathode rays • Cathode rays were shown to be electrons are affected by electric and magnetic fields • This allowed him to determine the mass/charge ration of an electron Cathode rays are released by metals at the cathode 3 4 Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Lecture 4 - Observations that Led to the Nuclear Model of the Atom Nuclear Model of the Atom In 1897, J.J. Thomson (1856-1940) studies how cathode rays In 1897, J.J. Thomson (1856-1940) studies how cathode rays are affected by electric and magnetic fields are affected by electric and magnetic fields • Thomson estimated that the mass of an electron was less • Thomson received the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physics for his that 1/1000 the mass of the lightest atom, hydrogen!! work.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science
    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2018 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Appendix E Nobel Prizes in Nuclear Science Many Nobel Prizes have been awarded for nuclear research and instrumentation. The field has spun off: particle physics, nuclear astrophysics, nuclear power reactors, nuclear medicine, and nuclear weapons. Understanding how the nucleus works and applying that knowledge to technology has been one of the most significant accomplishments of twentieth century scientific research. Each prize was awarded for physics unless otherwise noted. Name(s) Discovery Year Henri Becquerel, Pierre Discovered spontaneous radioactivity 1903 Curie, and Marie Curie Ernest Rutherford Work on the disintegration of the elements and 1908 chemistry of radioactive elements (chem) Marie Curie Discovery of radium and polonium 1911 (chem) Frederick Soddy Work on chemistry of radioactive substances 1921 including the origin and nature of radioactive (chem) isotopes Francis Aston Discovery of isotopes in many non-radioactive 1922 elements, also enunciated the whole-number rule of (chem) atomic masses Charles Wilson Development of the cloud chamber for detecting 1927 charged particles Harold Urey Discovery of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) 1934 (chem) Frederic Joliot and Synthesis of several new radioactive elements 1935 Irene Joliot-Curie (chem) James Chadwick Discovery of the neutron 1935 Carl David Anderson Discovery of the positron 1936 Enrico Fermi New radioactive elements produced by neutron 1938 irradiation Ernest Lawrence
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background Prepared by Dr, Robin Chaplin Professor of Power Plant Engineering (Retired) University of New Brunswick
    1 Historical Background prepared by Dr, Robin Chaplin Professor of Power Plant Engineering (retired) University of New Brunswick Summary: A review of the historical background for the development of nuclear energy is given to set the scene for the discussion of CANDU reactors. Table of Contents 1 Growth of Science and Technology......................................................................................... 2 2 Renowned Scientists............................................................................................................... 4 3 Significant Achievements........................................................................................................ 6 3.1 Niels Bohr........................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 James Chadwick .............................................................................................................. 6 3.3 Enrico Fermi .................................................................................................................... 6 4 Nuclear Fission........................................................................................................................ 7 5 Nuclear Energy........................................................................................................................ 7 6 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................... 8 List of Figures Figure 1 Timeline of significant discoveries
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Zero, Absolute Temperature. Absolute Zero Is the Lowest
    Contents Radioactivity: The First Puzzles................................................ 1 The “Uranic Rays” of Henri Becquerel .......................................... 1 The Discovery ............................................................... 2 Is It Really Phosphorescence? .............................................. 4 What Is the Nature of the Radiation?....................................... 5 A Limited Impact on Scientists and the Public ............................ 6 Why 1896? .................................................................. 7 Was Radioactivity Discovered by Chance? ................................ 7 Polonium and Radium............................................................. 9 Marya Skłodowska .......................................................... 9 Pierre Curie .................................................................. 10 Polonium and Radium: Pierre and Marie Curie Invent Radiochemistry.. 11 Enigmas...................................................................... 14 Emanation from Thorium ......................................................... 17 Ernest Rutherford ........................................................... 17 Rutherford Studies Radioactivity: ˛-and ˇ-Rays.......................... 18 ˇ-Rays Are Electrons ....................................................... 19 Rutherford in Montreal: The Radiation of Thorium, the Exponential Decrease........................................... 19 “Induced” and “Excited” Radioactivity .................................... 20 Elster
    [Show full text]
  • Character List
    Character List - Bomb ​ Use this chart to help you keep track of the hundreds of names of physicists, freedom fighters, government officials, and others involved in the making of the atomic bomb. Scientists Political/Military Leaders Spies Robert Oppenheimer - Winston Churchill -- Prime Klaus Fuchs - physicist in ​ ​ ​ designed atomic bomb. He was Minister of England Manhattan Project who gave accused of spying. secrets to Russia Franklin D. Roosevelt -- ​ Albert Einstein - convinced President of the United States Harry Gold - spy and Courier ​ ​ U.S. government that they for Russia KGB. Narrator of the needed to research fission. Harry Truman -- President of story ​ the United States Enrico Fermi - created first Ruth Werner - Russian spy ​ ​ chain reaction Joseph Stalin -- dictator of the ​ Tell Hall -- physicist in Soviet Union ​ Igor Korchatov -- Russian Manhattan Project who gave ​ physicist in charge of designing Adolf Hitler -- dictator of secrets to Russia ​ bomb Germany Haakon Chevalier - friend who ​ Werner Reisenberg -- Leslie Groves -- Military approached Oppenheimer about ​ ​ German physicist in charge of leader of the Manhattan Project spying for Russia. He was designing bomb watched by the FBI, but he was not charged. Otto Hahn -- German physicist ​ who discovered fission Other scientists involved in the Manhattan Project: ​ Aage Niels Bohr George Kistiakowsky Joseph W. Kennedy Richard Feynman Arthur C. Wahl Frank Oppenheimer Joseph Rotblat Robert Bacher Arthur H. Compton Hans Bethe Karl T. Compton Robert Serber Charles Critchfield Harold Agnew Kenneth Bainbridge Robert Wilson Charles Thomas Harold Urey Leo James Rainwater Rudolf Pelerls Crawford Greenewalt Harold DeWolf Smyth Leo Szilard Samuel K. Allison Cyril S. Smith Herbert L. Anderson Luis Alvarez Samuel Goudsmit Edward Norris Isidor I.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary & Notes Hans Bethe
    J. Natn.Sci.Foundation Sri Lanka 2005 33(1): 57-58 COMMENTARY & NOTES HANS BETHE (1906-2005) Hans Albrecht Bethe who died on 6 March 2005 within the sun is hydrogen which is available in at the age of 98, was one of the most influential tremendous volume. Near the centre of the sun, and innovative theoretical physicists of our time. hydrogen nuclei can be squeezed under enormous pressure to become the element helium. If the Bethe was born in Strasbourg, Alsace- mass of hydrogen nucleus can be written as 1, Lorraine (then part of Germany) on 2 July 1906. Bethe showed that each time four nuclei of His father was a University physiologist and his hydrogen fused together as helium, their sum was mother Jewish, the daughter of a Strasbourg not equal to 4. The helium nucleus weighs about professor of Medicine. Bethe moved to Kiel and 0.7% less, or just 3.993 units of weight. It is this Frankfurt from where he went to Munich to carry missing 0.7% that comes out as a burst of explosive out research in theoretical physics under Arnold energy. The sun is so powerful that it pumps 4 Sommerfeld, who was not only a great teacher, million tons of hydrogen into pure energy every but an inspiring research supervisor as well. second. Einstein's famous equation, E = mc2, Bethe received his doctorate in 1928, for the work provides a clue to the massive energy that reaches he did on electron diffraction. He then went to the earth from the sun, when 4 million tons of the Cavendish laboratory in Cambridge on a hydrogen are multiplied by the figure c2 (square Rockefeller Fellowship, and Rome, before of the speed of light).
    [Show full text]
  • The Institute for Radium Research in Red Vienna
    Trafficking Materials and Maria Rentetzi Gendered Experimental Practices Chapter 4 The Institute for Radium Research in Red Vienna As this work has now been organized after several years of tentative efforts each collaborator has his or her [emphasis mine] particular share to take in making the practical preparations necessary for an experiment. Besides each has his or her particular theme for research which he pursues and where he can count on the help from one or more of his fellow workers. Such help is freely given certain workers having spent months preparing the means required for another workers theme.1 When Hans Pettersson submitted this description of the work at the Radium 1 Institute in a report to the International Education Board in April 1928, several women physicists were already part of his research team on artificial disintegration. A number of other women explored radiophysics and radiochemistry as collaborators of the institute, formed their own research groups, and worked alongside some of the best-known male physicists in the field. More specifically, between 1919 and 1934, more than one-third of the institute's personnel were women. They were not technicians or members of the laboratory support stuff but experienced researchers or practicum students who published at the same rate as their male counterparts. Marelene Rayner-Canham and Geoffrey Rayner-Canham have already drawn our 2 attention to the fact that women clustered in radioactivity research in the early twentieth century. Identifying three different European research schools on radioactivity—the French, English, and Austro-German—the Rayner-Canhams argue that women "seemed to play a disproportionately large share in the research work in radioactivity compared to many other fields of physical science."2 Through prosopographical studies of important women in these three locations, the authors address the puzzle of why so many women were attracted to this particular field.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactivity Redux Marjorie C
    Metascience DOI 10.1007/s11016-012-9697-7 SURVEY REVIEW Radioactivity redux Marjorie C. Malley: Radioactivity: A history of a mysterious science. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011, xxi+267pp, $21.95 HB Lauren Redniss: Radioactive: Marie & Pierre Curie, a tale of love and fallout. New York: itbooks, HarperCollins Publishers, 2011, iv+205pp, $29.99 HB Naomi Pasachoff Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 As readers of Metascience probably know, just as 2005 was the International Year of Physics, commemorating the centennial of Einstein’s annus mirabilis, and 2009 was the International Year of Astronomy, commemorating the 400th anniversaries of Galileo’s telescope and of Kepler’s Astronomia Nova, 2011 was the International Year of Chemistry, commemorating the 100th anniversary of Marie Curie’s Nobel Prize for Chemistry, ‘‘in recognition of her services to the advancement of chemistry by the discovery of the elements, radium and polonium, by the isolation of radium and the study of the nature and compounds of this remarkable element.’’ In 1898, Curie coined the term radioactivity to describe the properties of radium and polonium and similar substances. Neither of the two books under consideration in this review calls attention to the IYC, but, because of their link to Curie, it is perfectly appropriate that they were both published in 2011. Each book garnered more than a measure of praise, with Malley’s selected by the editors at Amazon.com and the staff of the Christian Science Monitor as one of the ‘‘nine best books of August’’ 2011, and Redniss’s becoming a finalist for the 2011 National Book Award for nonfiction.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Development of Atomic Theory READINGS.Pdf
    Collaborative Learning Activity – How is it we have come to understand the inner workings of the atom? You will be split between several Groups, dependent on class size. In each group you will be responsible for a specific volume of the material. As “experts” you must be able to teach your part of the information regarding the historical development of the present-day model of the atom to others in each group. You will create a timeline of historical figures and brief sketches of each model of the atom as it evolved into what science now understands regarding the atom. The biographical information presented is important, but your main focus should be on the scientific contributions and experimentation that have guided physicists to present day understanding of the nature of the atom. Home Groups 1-6 Select Experts A - F rotate between Home Groups, Experts stay put. Activity: Step one day one. As a group, identify and illustrate the historical developments relevant to the structure of the atom as it came to be known during the period assigned to your group. Devise a plan to present to various Home Groups the following day. We will explore and highlight key developments from the ancient Greeks till now. Step two – Preparation: Finalize any of your research and Expert Graphic Organizer for presenting to Home Groups. Step three day two. Selected experts will rotate around the room and present their findings. Complete Timeline and sketches of the various models. Step four - Preparation: Complete / finalize any notes you miss. https://www.slideshare.net/mrtangextrahelp/02-a-bohr-rutherford-diagrams-and-lewis-dot-diagrams 1 Group 1 - Group 1 - Group 1 - Group 1 - Group 1 - Group 1 Do atoms exist? One of the most remarkable features of atomic theory is that even today, after hundreds of years of research, no one has yet “seen” a single atom.
    [Show full text]
  • APS Membership Boosted by Student Sign-Ups Physics Newsmakers of 2013
    February 2014 • Vol. 23, No. 2 Profiles in Versatility: A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY Olympics Special Edition WWW.APS.ORG/PUBLICATIONS/APSNEWS See Page 3 APS Membership Boosted by Student Sign-ups The American Physical Society up for a free year of student mem- Physics Newsmakers of 2013 hit a new membership record in bership in the Society. APS Membership 2011-2014 2013 with students making up the In addition, the Society added 50,578 50,600 bulk of the growth. After complet- nearly 100 new early-career mem- Total ing its annual count, the APS mem- bers after a change in policy that Members The Envelope Please . bership department announced that extended membership discounts for 49,950 By Michael Lucibella the Society had reached 50,578 early-career members from three 49,300 members, an increase of 925 over to five years. “The change to five- Each year, APS News looks back last year, following a general five- year eligibility in the early career 48,650 at the headlines around the world year trend. “When we were able to category definitely helped.” Lettieri to see which physics news stories get up over 50,000 again, that was said. “That’s where a lot of our fo- 48,000 grabbed the most attention. They’re good news. That keeps us moving cus is going to be now, with stu- stories that the wider public paid in the right direction,” said Trish dents and early-career members.” 15,747 attention to and news that made a 16,000 Total Lettieri, the director of APS Mem- Student big splash.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic-Scientists.Pdf
    Table of Contents Becquerel, Henri Blumgart, Herman Bohr, Niels Chadwick, James Compton, Arthur Coolidge, William Curie, Marie Curie, Pierre Dalton, John de Hevesy, George Einstein, Albert Evans, Robely Failla, Gioacchino Fermi, Enrico Frisch, Otto Geiger, Hans Goeppert-Mayer, Maria Hahn, Otto Heisenberg, Werner Hess, Victor Francis Joliet-Curie, Frederic Joliet-Curie, Irene Klaproth, Martin Langevin, Paul Lawrence, Ernest Meitner, Lise Millikan, Robert Moseley, Henry Muller, Hermann Noddack, Ida Parker, Herbert Peierls, Rudolf Quimby, Edith Ray, Dixie Lee Roentgen, Wilhelm Rutherford, Ernest Seaborg, Glenn Soddy, Frederick Strassman, Fritz Szilard, Leo Teller, Edward Thomson, Joseph Villard, Paul Yalow, Rosalyn Antoine Henri Becquerel 1852 - 1908 French physicist who was an expert on fluorescence. He discovered the rays emitted from the uranium salts in pitchblende, called Becquerel rays, which led to the isolation of radium and to the beginning of modern nuclear physics. He shared the 1903 Nobel Prize for Physics with Pierre and Marie Curie for the discovery of radioactivity.1 Early Life Antoine Henri Becquerel was born in Paris, France on December 15, 1852.3 He was born into a family of scientists and scholars. His grandfather, Antoine Cesar Bequerel, invented an electrolytic method for extracting metals from their ores. His father, Alexander Edmond Becquerel, a Professor of Applied Physics, was known for his research on solar radiation and on phosphorescence.2, 3 Becquerel not only inherited their interest in science, but he also inherited the minerals and compounds studied by his father, which gave him a ready source of fluorescent materials in which to pursue his own investigations into the mysterious ways of Wilhelm Roentgen’s newly discovered phenomenon, X-rays.2 Henri received his formal, scientific education at Ecole Polytechnique in 1872 and attended the Ecole des Ponts at Chaussees from 1874-77 for his engineering training.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of the Nuclear Age
    The Beginning of the Nuclear Age M. SHIFMAN 1 Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota 1 Introduction A few years ago I delivered a lecture course for pre-med freshmen students. It was a required calculus-based introductory course, with a huge class of nearly 200. The problem was that the majority of students had a limited exposure to physics, and, what was even worse, low interest in this subject. They had an impression that a physics course was a formal requirement and they would never need physics in their future lives. Besides, by the end of the week they were apparently tired. To remedy this problem I decided that each Friday I would break the standard succession of topics, and tell them of something physics-related but { simultaneously { entertaining. Three or four Friday lectures were devoted to why certain Hollywood movies contradict laws of Nature. After looking through fragments we discussed which particular laws were grossly violated and why. I remember that during one Friday lecture I captivated students with TV sci-fi miniseries on a catastrophic earthquake entitled 10.5, and then we talked about real-life earthquakes. Humans have been recording earthquakes for nearly 4,000 years. The deadliest one happened in China in 1556 A.D. On January 23 of that year, a powerful quake killed an estimated 830,000 people. By today's estimate its Richter scale magnitude was about 8.3. The strongest earthquake ever recorded was the 9.5-magnitude Valdivia earthquake in Chile which occurred in 1960. My remark that in passing from 9.5.
    [Show full text]