DOCSLIB.ORG

IBM X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly 2 X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly IBM Security Solutions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IBM X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly 2 X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly IBM Security Solutions IBM Security Solutions May 2011 IBM X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly 2 X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly IBM Security Solutions Contents About the report 2 About the Report The IBM X-Force® Threat Insight Quarterly is designed to highlight some of the most significant threats and challenges 3 Evolution: From Nuisance to Weapon facing security professionals today. This report is a product of IBM Managed Security Services and the IBM X-Force 8 Prolific and Impacting Issues of Q1 2011 research and development team. Each issue focuses on specific challenges and provides a recap of the most significant recent 16 References online threats. IBM Managed Security Services are designed to help an organization improve its information security, by outsourcing security operations or supplementing your existing security teams. The IBM protection on-demand platform helps deliver Managed Security Services and the expertise, knowledge and infrastructure an organization needs to secure its information assets from Internet attacks. The X-Force team provides the foundation for a preemptive approach to Internet security. The X-Force team is one of the best-known commercial security research groups in the world. This group of security experts researches and evaluates vulnerabilities and security issues, develops assessment and countermeasure technology for IBM security products, and educates the public about emerging Internet threats. We welcome your feedback. Questions or comments regarding the content of this report should be addressed to [email protected]. 3 X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly IBM Security Solutions Evolution: From Nuisance to Weapon One of the more notable examples here is Brain3, a boot sector infector which originated in Pakistan and released in 1986, was Creeper, Wabbit, Animal, Elk Cloner, Brain, Vienna, Lehigh, one of the first examples of malware that infected PC’s running Stoned, Jerusalem. These are the names of early examples of MS-DOS. It infected the boot sector of FAT formatted what today we generally simply refer to as malware which removable media (read Floppies) and was actually written as a appeared between 1971 and 1987. means to control software piracy. It was not as such malicious however that did not stop it from infecting victims other than This was the beginning. These examples infected various the intended targets. The authors had even placed their platforms and delivered various payloads, some just a simple contact information in the code which resulted in them having message echoed to a screen. While Sci-Fi writers such as John to get their telephone line disconnected due to the number of Brunner in “Shockwave Rider” wrote conceptually about calls they received from irate victims of Brain. viruses and worms, it was not until 1984 that Fred Cohen1 gave 4 such programs a true mathematical definition. The age of the In December 1987 Christmas Tree Exec appeared on IBM “Computer Virus” was upon us. mainframes causing significant disruption on EARN, BITNET with IBM’s VNET. A user would receive an email which Creeper2 is arguably the first virus, or more accurately, worm, invited them to execute “CHRISTMAS”, which would draw a and infected only DEC PDP-10 computers. While it was Christmas tree on their terminal. It did indeed do this, and also written as a demonstration, it spread through ARPANET in sent itself to other users located through the NAMES and 1971 with a simple payload, a text message which read, “I’m NETLOG files. While this technique for replication might the creeper, catch me if you can!”. The characteristics of self seem very familiar now, it wasn’t then. The author of the replication and spreading via a network are important concepts malware stated the intention of the code was simply to send a in malware which remain with us today. In response to greeting to a few friends but it resulted in his being barred Creeper, came the Reaper, a virus in itself which spread across from access to their system. the same network however it’s goal, was to delete instances of Creeper. It can be argued that Reaper was the first example of Moving forward to 1988, we come to one of the most famous anti-virus software. Its task was to detect and remove malware. items of malware in history and we begin to see the signs of 5 However code that executes on a system or spreads across a sophistication creeping in. The Robert Morris Worm was network without permission is not welcome at all. More unique at the time because it exploited vulnerabilities in recently, the same technique has been used by modern malware sendmail, finger and weak passwords. It also was able to infect used to create botnets attempting to remove instances of other multiple architectures. Its transport was the fledgling Internet. botnet malware so as to take control on the affected system. When it was released into the wild, it began clogging systems and soon resulted in a denial of service condition which directly or indirectly affected most systems attached to the Internet. 1 Fred Cohen & Associates http://all.net/resume/bio.html 2 25th anniversary of the computer virus? Not so fast http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-9745010-17.html 3 Searching for the first PC virus in Pakistan http://campaigns.f-secure.com/brain/index.html 4 Security Digest Archives http://securitydigest.org/rutgers/mirror/pyrite.rutgers.edu/christmas.exec 5 Morris Worm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_worm 4 X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly IBM Security Solutions The effect of Robert Morris’ worm was significant enough to Deserving of a mention from 1991 is the virus known as lead to the establishment of the CERT Coordination Center6 Michelangelo11. The mention however is not simply for the at Carnegie Mellon University. According to Robert Morris, virus, rather the hype that with it. There were wild and dire the creator of the worm, it was not written with malicious predictions that Michelangelo would wreck havoc. How widely intent rather it was written as a tool to gauge the size of the spread the virus was is not easy to determine. It seemed to Internet. The devastation it caused was an unintended spread globally, but the estimates of the number of computers consequence. Morris was however convicted of violating the that would be affected on March 6 1992, with some reports 1986 United States Computer Fraud and Abuse Act7 (amended quoting up to five million, turned out to be off target. Various since 1986) and was sentenced to three years probation, four experts and pundits made many claims12 regarding the number hundred hours of community work and a fine of $10,000. of infected computers, how the virus spread, and ways in which users could avoid damage by the virus when the trigger date In early 1989 we see Polymorphic encryption in the wild, a was reached. The virus itself was a DOS boot sector infector very notable stage of virus evolution. Predicted by Fred and remained dormant, until the trigger date. Cohen, brought into existence by Mark Washburn8 and the 1260 virus but, arguably most famously seen in the Mutation It is in 1999 that we really begin to see evolution in how we Engine written by the legendary Dark Avenger9. understand viruses today, with Happy9913 and Melissa14 as Polymorphism, simply put is the code’s ability to periodically poignant examples. Happy99 can be considered the first virus modify itself which is done to evade detection. The Dark to be propagated by email as we commonly know it today. Avenger has never been positively identified but a paper Melissa on the other hand was a worm delivered inside a Word written by Sara Gordon10 who interviewed the Dark Avenger document. Once active, one of the tasks of the worm was to (online) and published in 1993 provides a glimpse into the replicate by sending itself to the first fifty users in the victims mind of the author. The viruses created by the Dark Avenger address book. This not only spread the virus quickly, but email were very infectious and damaging. traffic generated started clogging email servers. At the time, Melissa may have been the fastest spreading virus in history. 6 Meet CERT http://www.cert.org/meet_cert/ 7 Unites States Code: TITLE 18, 1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1030.html 8 1260 (computer virus) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1260_(computer_virus) 9 Dark Avenger http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Avenger 10 Inside the Mind of Dark Avenger http://www.research.ibm.com/antivirus/SciPapers/Gordon/Avenger.html 11 Michelangelo (computer virus) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelangelo_%28virus%29 12 Michelangelo Fiasco: a Historical Timeline http://vmyths.com/column/1/1992/6/1/ 13 Email-Worm.Win32.Happy http://www.securelist.com/en/descriptions/old22314 14 Virus:W32/Melissa http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/melissa.shtml 5 X-Force Threat Insight Quarterly IBM Security Solutions In 1988 when the Morris worm went wild, the Internet had IloveYou or the ten or so variants that had also surfaced within around 100,000 systems attached to it. By December 1998, the first 24 hours. It was also reported that18 this worm caused four months prior to Melissa, the Internet had some 148 the Pentagon, CIA, and the British Parliament to shut down million users. It is self evident that the impact of Melissa was their email systems. Estimates of the financial cost of the more widely felt than the impact of the Morris worm. The damage caused by IloveYou and variants range up to $5.5 author of Melissa was apprehended and sentenced15 to 20 billion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Botnets, Cybercrime, and Cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL32114 Botnets, Cybercrime, and Cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress Updated January 29, 2008 Clay Wilson Specialist in Technology and National Security Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Botnets, Cybercrime, and Cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues for Congress Summary Cybercrime is becoming more organized and established as a transnational business. High technology online skills are now available for rent to a variety of customers, possibly including nation states, or individuals and groups that could secretly represent terrorist groups. The increased use of automated attack tools by cybercriminals has overwhelmed some current methodologies used for tracking Internet cyberattacks, and vulnerabilities of the U.S. critical infrastructure, which are acknowledged openly in publications, could possibly attract cyberattacks to extort money, or damage the U.S. economy to affect national security. In April and May 2007, NATO and the United States sent computer security experts to Estonia to help that nation recover from cyberattacks directed against government computer systems, and to analyze the methods used and determine the source of the attacks.1 Some security experts suspect that political protestors may have rented the services of cybercriminals, possibly a large network of infected PCs, called a “botnet,” to help disrupt the computer systems of the Estonian government. DOD officials have also indicated that similar cyberattacks from individuals and countries targeting economic,
    [Show full text]
  • A the Hacker
    A The Hacker Madame Curie once said “En science, nous devons nous int´eresser aux choses, non aux personnes [In science, we should be interested in things, not in people].” Things, however, have since changed, and today we have to be interested not just in the facts of computer security and crime, but in the people who perpetrate these acts. Hence this discussion of hackers. Over the centuries, the term “hacker” has referred to various activities. We are familiar with usages such as “a carpenter hacking wood with an ax” and “a butcher hacking meat with a cleaver,” but it seems that the modern, computer-related form of this term originated in the many pranks and practi- cal jokes perpetrated by students at MIT in the 1960s. As an example of the many meanings assigned to this term, see [Schneier 04] which, among much other information, explains why Galileo was a hacker but Aristotle wasn’t. A hack is a person lacking talent or ability, as in a “hack writer.” Hack as a verb is used in contexts such as “hack the media,” “hack your brain,” and “hack your reputation.” Recently, it has also come to mean either a kludge, or the opposite of a kludge, as in a clever or elegant solution to a difficult problem. A hack also means a simple but often inelegant solution or technique. The following tentative definitions are quoted from the jargon file ([jargon 04], edited by Eric S. Raymond): 1. A person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems and how to stretch their capabilities, as opposed to most users, who prefer to learn only the minimum necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey Heim, Marcel Hernandez, Maria Nunez,& Matthias Katerna Morris Worm on November 2, 1988, Robert Tappan Morris Releas
    Jeffrey Heim, Marcel Hernandez, Maria Nunez,& Matthias Katerna Morris Worm On November 2, 1988, Robert Tappan Morris released a worm into the internet. The experimental worm was the first of its kind. It replicated itself and programmed itself, so it ended up spreading much faster than Morris expected. It self-programmed and self-replicated at an exponential rate in a manner that had never been seen before. Morris knew this worm was not necessarily ethical, for he released it out of MIT instead of his own Cornell University. In due course, many computers across the United States had crashed because of Morris. Once he discovered how much damage the worm had been causing, he reached out to a friend at Harvard looking for a solution to stop it. They attempted in sending an anonymous message to the network with directions that could kill the worm, but the message came through too late since they system was clogged. Many significant computers at colleges, businesses and the military became infected. The cost to fix each computer ranged from $200 to over $53,000. The worm exploited vulnerabilities in computer systems and in the UNIX email software. Within 24 hours of releasing the worm, thousands of people were aware something was unusual. Eventually, it would infect ten percent of all computers using the internet. The Morris Worm was the largest malware case ever to reach this percentage. However, the percentage was so high due to the fact that the number of computers was much less than today. The computers it impacted included significant systems, such as Stanford’s, Berkley’s and NASA’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Hacks, Cracks, and Crime: an Examination of the Subculture and Social Organization of Computer Hackers Thomas Jeffrey Holt University of Missouri-St
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Missouri, St. Louis University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 11-22-2005 Hacks, Cracks, and Crime: An Examination of the Subculture and Social Organization of Computer Hackers Thomas Jeffrey Holt University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Holt, Thomas Jeffrey, "Hacks, Cracks, and Crime: An Examination of the Subculture and Social Organization of Computer Hackers" (2005). Dissertations. 616. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/616 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hacks, Cracks, and Crime: An Examination of the Subculture and Social Organization of Computer Hackers by THOMAS J. HOLT M.A., Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Missouri- St. Louis, 2003 B.A., Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Missouri- St. Louis, 2000 A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of the UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI- ST. LOUIS In partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Criminology and Criminal Justice August, 2005 Advisory Committee Jody Miller, Ph. D. Chairperson Scott H. Decker, Ph. D. G. David Curry, Ph. D. Vicki Sauter, Ph. D. Copyright 2005 by Thomas Jeffrey Holt All Rights Reserved Holt, Thomas, 2005, UMSL, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Explorer 9 Features
    m National Institute of Information Technologies NIIT White Paper On “What is New in Internet Explorer 9” Submitted by: Md. Yusuf Hasan Student ID: S093022200027 Year: 1st Quarter: 2nd Program: M.M.S Date - 08 June 2010 Dhaka - Bangladesh Internet Explorer History Abstract: In the early 90s—the dawn of history as far as the World Wide Web is concerned—relatively few users were communicating across this Internet Explorer 9 (abbreviated as IE9) is the upcoming global network. They used an assortment of shareware and other version of the Internet Explorer web browser from software for Microsoft Windows operating system. In 1995, Microsoft Microsoft. It is currently in development, but developer hosted an Internet Strategy Day and announced its commitment to adding Internet capabilities to all its products. In fulfillment of that previews have been released. announcement, Microsoft Internet Explorer arrived as both a graphical Web browser and the name for a set of technologies. IE9 will have complete or nearly complete support for all 1995: Internet Explorer 1.0: In July 1995, Microsoft released the CSS 3 selectors, border-radius CSS 3 property, faster Windows 95 operating system, which included built-in support for JavaScript and embedded ICC v2 or v4 color profiles dial-up networking and TCP/IP (Transmission Control support via Windows Color System. IE9 will feature Protocol/Internet Protocol), key technologies for connecting to the hardware accelerated graphics rendering using Direct2D, Internet. In response to the growing public interest in the Internet, Microsoft created an add-on to the operating system called Internet hardware accelerated text rendering using Direct Write, Explorer 1.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Security CS 426 Lecture 15
    Computer Security CS 426 Lecture 15 Malwares CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 1 Trapdoor • SttitittSecret entry point into a system – Specific user identifier or password that circumvents normal security procedures. • Commonlyyy used by developers – Could be included in a compiler. CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 2 Logic Bomb • Embedded in legitimate programs • Activated when specified conditions met – E.g., presence/absence of some file; Particular date/time or particular user • When triggered, typically damages system – Modify/delete files/disks CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 3 Examppgle of Logic Bomb • In 1982 , the Trans-Siber ian Pipe line inc iden t occurred. A KGB operative was to steal the plans fhititdtltditfor a sophisticated control system and its software from a Canadian firm, for use on their Siberi an pi peli ne. The CIA was tippe d o ff by documents in the Farewell Dossier and had the company itlibbithinsert a logic bomb in the program for sabotage purposes. This eventually resulted in "the most monu mental non-nu clear ex plosion and fire ever seen from space“. CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 4 Trojan Horse • Program with an overt Example: Attacker: (expected) and covert effect Place the following file cp /bin/sh /tmp/.xxsh – Appears normal/expected chmod u+s,o+x /tmp/.xxsh – Covert effect violates security policy rm ./ls • User tricked into executing ls $* Trojan horse as /homes/victim/ls – Expects (and sees) overt behavior – Covert effect performed with • Victim user’s authorization ls CS426 Fall 2010/Lecture 15 5 Virus • Self-replicating
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies of Computer Worms
    304543_ch09.qxd 1/7/05 9:05 AM Page 313 CHAPTER 9 Strategies of Computer Worms “Worm: n., A self-replicating program able to propagate itself across network, typically having a detrimental effect.” —Concise Oxford English Dictionary, Revised Tenth Edition 313 304543_ch09.qxd 1/7/05 9:05 AM Page 314 Chapter 9—Strategies of Computer Worms 9.1 Introduction This chapter discusses the generic (or at least “typical”) structure of advanced computer worms and the common strategies that computer worms use to invade new target systems. Computer worms primarily replicate on networks, but they represent a subclass of computer viruses. Interestingly enough, even in security research communities, many people imply that computer worms are dramatically different from computer viruses. In fact, even within CARO (Computer Antivirus Researchers Organization), researchers do not share a common view about what exactly can be classified as a “worm.” We wish to share a common view, but well, at least a few of us agree that all computer worms are ultimately viruses1. Let me explain. The network-oriented infection strategy is indeed a primary difference between viruses and computer worms. Moreover, worms usually do not need to infect files but propagate as standalone programs. Additionally, several worms can take con- trol of remote systems without any help from the users, usually exploiting a vul- nerability or set of vulnerabilities. These usual characteristics of computer worms, however, do not always hold. Table 9.1 shows several well-known threats. Table
    [Show full text]
  • Paradise Lost , Book III, Line 18
    _Paradise Lost_, book III, line 18 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ++++++++++Hacker's Encyclopedia++++++++ ===========by Logik Bomb (FOA)======== <http://www.xmission.com/~ryder/hack.html> ---------------(1997- Revised Second Edition)-------- ##################V2.5################## %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% "[W]atch where you go once you have entered here, and to whom you turn! Do not be misled by that wide and easy passage!" And my Guide [said] to him: "That is not your concern; it is his fate to enter every door. This has been willed where what is willed must be, and is not yours to question. Say no more." -Dante Alighieri _The Inferno_, 1321 Translated by John Ciardi Acknowledgments ---------------------------- Dedicated to all those who disseminate information, forbidden or otherwise. Also, I should note that a few of these entries are taken from "A Complete List of Hacker Slang and Other Things," Version 1C, by Casual, Bloodwing and Crusader; this doc started out as an unofficial update. However, I've updated, altered, expanded, re-written and otherwise torn apart the original document, so I'd be surprised if you could find any vestiges of the original file left. I think the list is very informative; it came out in 1990, though, which makes it somewhat outdated. I also got a lot of information from the works listed in my bibliography, (it's at the end, after all the quotes) as well as many miscellaneous back issues of such e-zines as _Cheap Truth _, _40Hex_, the _LOD/H Technical Journals_ and _Phrack Magazine_; and print magazines such as _Internet Underground_, _Macworld_, _Mondo 2000_, _Newsweek_, _2600: The Hacker Quarterly_, _U.S. News & World Report_, _Time_, and _Wired_; in addition to various people I've consulted.
    [Show full text]
  • Tangled Web : Tales of Digital Crime from the Shadows of Cyberspace
    TANGLED WEB Tales of Digital Crime from the Shadows of Cyberspace RICHARD POWER A Division of Macmillan USA 201 West 103rd Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46290 Tangled Web: Tales of Digital Crime Associate Publisher from the Shadows of Cyberspace Tracy Dunkelberger Copyright 2000 by Que Corporation Acquisitions Editor All rights reserved. No part of this book shall be reproduced, stored in a Kathryn Purdum retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, pho- Development Editor tocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the Hugh Vandivier publisher. No patent liability is assumed with respect to the use of the infor- mation contained herein. Although every precaution has been taken in the Managing Editor preparation of this book, the publisher and author assume no responsibility Thomas Hayes for errors or omissions. Nor is any liability assumed for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. Project Editor International Standard Book Number: 0-7897-2443-x Tonya Simpson Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 00-106209 Copy Editor Printed in the United States of America Michael Dietsch First Printing: September 2000 Indexer 02 01 00 4 3 2 Erika Millen Trademarks Proofreader Benjamin Berg All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or ser- vice marks have been appropriately capitalized. Que Corporation cannot Team Coordinator attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should Vicki Harding not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. Design Manager Warning and Disclaimer Sandra Schroeder Every effort has been made to make this book as complete and as accurate Cover Designer as possible, but no warranty or fitness is implied.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Health Information Technology and Security
    DICTIONARY OF HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SECURITY Dr. David Edward Marcinko, MBA , CFP© Certifi ed Medical Planner© Editor-in-Chief Hope Rachel Hetico, RN, MSHA, CPHQ Certifi ed Medical Planner© Managing Editor NEW YORK 33021009_FM1.indd021009_FM1.indd i 003/17/20073/17/2007 116:48:506:48:50 Copyright © 2007 Springer Publishing Company, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmit- ted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Springer Publishing Company, LLC. Springer Publishing Company, LLC 11 West 42nd Street New York, NY 10036 www.springerpub.com Acquisitions Editor: Sheri W. Sussman Production Editor: Carol Cain Cover design: Mimi Flow Composition: Apex Publishing, LLC 07 08 09 10/ 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dictionary of health information technology and security / David Edward Marcinko, editor-in-chief, Hope Rachel Hetico, managing editor. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-8261-4995-4 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8261-4995-2 (alk. paper) 1. Medical informatics—Dictionaries. 2. Medicine—Information technology—Dictionaries. 3. Medical informatics—Security measures— Dictionaries. I. Marcinko, David E. (David Edward) II. Hetico, Hope R. [DNLM: 1. Informatics—Dictionary—English. 2. Medical Informatics— Dictionary—English. 3. Computer Communication Networks—Dictionary— English. 4. Computer Security—Dictionary—English. W 13 D557165 2007] R858.D53 2007 610.3—dc22 2007005879 Printed in the United States of America by RR Donnelley. 33021009_FM1.indd021009_FM1.indd iiii 003/17/20073/17/2007 116:48:516:48:51 Th e Dictionary of Health Information Technology and Security is dedicated to Edward Anthony Marcinko Sr., and Edward Anthony Marcinko Jr., of Fell’s Point, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Flexible Infections: Computer Viruses, Human Bodies, Nation-States, Evolutionary Capitalism
    Science,Helmreich Technology, / Flexible Infections& Human Values Flexible Infections: Computer Viruses, Human Bodies, Nation-States, Evolutionary Capitalism Stefan Helmreich New York University This article analyzes computer security rhetoric, particularly in the United States, argu- ing that dominant cultural understandings of immunology, sexuality, legality, citizen- ship, and capitalism powerfully shape the way computer viruses are construed and com- bated. Drawing on popular and technical handbooks, articles, and Web sites, as well as on e-mail interviews with security professionals, the author explores how discussions of computer viruses lean on analogies from immunology and in the process often encode popular anxieties about AIDS. Computer security rhetoric about compromised networks also uses language reminiscent of that used to describe the “bodies” of nation-states under military threat from without and within. Such language portrays viruses using images of foreignness, illegality, and otherness. The security response to viruses advo- cates the virtues of the flexible and adaptive response—a rhetoric that depends on evolu- tionary language but also on the ideological idiom of advanced capitalism. As networked computing becomes increasingly essential to the operations of corporations, banks, government, the military, and academia, worries about computer security and about computer viruses are intensifying among the people who manage and use these networks. The end of the 1990s saw the emergence of a small industry dedicated to antivirus protection software, and one can now find on the World Wide Web a great deal of information about how viruses work, how they can be combated, and how computer users might keep up with ever-changing inventories and taxonomies of the latest viruses.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Viruses, Worms, and Blended Threats
    Chapter 3 Chapter 3: Viruses, Worms, and Blended Threats.........................................................................46 Evolution of Viruses and Countermeasures...................................................................................46 The Early Days of Viruses.................................................................................................47 Beyond Annoyance: The Proliferation of Destructive Viruses .........................................48 Wiping Out Hard Drives—CIH Virus ...................................................................48 Virus Programming for the Masses 1: Macro Viruses...........................................48 Virus Programming for the Masses 2: Virus Generators.......................................50 Evolving Threats, Evolving Countermeasures ..................................................................51 Detecting Viruses...................................................................................................51 Radical Evolution—Polymorphic and Metamorphic Viruses ...............................53 Detecting Complex Viruses ...................................................................................55 State of Virus Detection.........................................................................................55 Trends in Virus Evolution..................................................................................................56 Worms and Vulnerabilities ............................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]